Thứ Hai, 4 tháng 2, 2019

Waching daily Feb 4 2019

(Adrian Monte) Skydivers and wingsuit flyers

may call what they do free-falling,

but as you may have noticed by now, in physics,

words mean something a little more specific.

So let's explore what freefall is all about

in this segment of "Physics in Motion".

♪♪

Freefall is what an object does

when it is under the influence of only one force, gravity.

We have to go way back in history

to get a handle on why this matters,

but we'll keep it short.

For thousands of years,

scientists thought that how fast something fell

depended on how heavy it was.

Seemed only logical.

But in the 16th century,

one of the all-time science hall of fame geniuses,

Galileo, had an idea.

He suspected that all objects, regardless of their mass,

fell at the same rate of acceleration.

If he were to take two objects,

one light and the other heavy, and drop them from a height,

they would both hit the ground at the same time.

This showed that acceleration is independent of mass.

Let's go try this ourselves.

So, between this watermelon and this cantaloupe,

which do you think will hit the ground first?

Both hit at the same time.

The watermelon made a bigger mess,

but as far as acceleration goes,

we verified Galileo's point.

It even works on the moon.

Take a look at this clip from Apollo 15.

The gravity on the moon,

even though it's less than that of Earth,

still made the feather and hammer drop

at the same rate of acceleration.

Gravity, in fact,

is one of the most important forces in the universe.

So back to the 16th century.

When people realized that objects behaved this way,

it was a major turning point in understanding

how the universe works,

and being able to predict how things will move.

Galileo, using the instruments available to him,

measured the acceleration that was due to gravity on Earth,

no matter what the object,

at about 10 meters per second squared.

We now know it is 9.8 meters per second squared

near the surface of the Earth.

So he wasn't far off, which is impressive,

considering he used his heart rate as a timer.

That is the constant rate on Earth

that the force of gravity accelerates everything.

All objects, regardless of their mass,

fall at the same rate.

9.8 meters per second squared.

But, you say, what about air resistance?

And you're right.

But let's put other factors aside for right now,

since we're only concerned with how things work in freefall.

We'll get to those in another video.

Now, let's look at a freefall problem together.

Let's say that we throw a ball upwards.

What is the ball's maximum height,

and why is that a freefall problem?

Because, technically, an object is in freefall

even when moving upwards,

or instantaneously at rest at the top of its motion.

Because, remember,

freefall means that gravity is the only force

acting on an object.

We can use some of the variables we know

to plug into an equation to solve the problem.

The origin is the place the ball left our hand,

and the positive direction is up.

Let's say I throw the ball at 10 meters per second

up in the positive direction.

I want to find out what my ball's maximum height will be

before it starts falling down.

There are steps we can follow

any time we solve problems that involve kinematic equations.

Step 1 is to write down your variables.

The ball's initial velocity

would be positive 10 meters per second,

because it's traveling up in the positive direction.

But when the ball leaves my hand,

it immediately starts to decelerate,

because it is only under the influence

of the force of gravity.

The ball's acceleration, A sub G,

is negative 9.8 meters per second squared,

because when it is decelerating,

its initial velocity and acceleration

have opposite signs,

we are slowing down in the positive direction.

It decelerates until it reaches a velocity of zero,

at its maximum height in its travel.

And that's V sub TOP.

We now have values for our initial velocity,

final velocity, and acceleration.

Our unknown is our maximum height,

which we represent as d, displacement.

The next step is find one of the four equations

you can see here that has the three variables that we know,

and has our unknown variable, all within the same equation.

We should use equation number 2.

Final velocity squared equals initial velocity squared

plus two times our acceleration times displacement.

Now, let's do step 3,

plugging in all of the variables that we know,

along with the symbol D,

representing the thing we are solving for, displacement.

Our final velocity is 0 meters per second,

and it is squared.

This is equal to 10 meters per second squared

plus 2 times negative 9.8 times the displacement.

In the final step, step 4, we solve for the unknown,

displacement.

We get rid of the exponents by squaring the numbers

and units within parentheses.

0 squared is 0, and 10 squared is 100.

Then, subtract 100 from both sides.

Which leaves us with the equation

negative 100 meters squared per second squared

equals negative 19.6 meters per second squared

times our displacement.

We need to get displacement alone,

so we divide both sides by 19.6.

This gives us a displacement of 5.1 meters.

That's how far my throw traveled in freefall

before it reached its maximum height of 5.1 meters.

Here's a bonus question for you.

At what velocity will it reach my hand

when it falls back down?

It will be the same speed that it left my hand

to begin with, 10 meters per second.

Except, this time,

the velocity will be negative 10 meters per second,

because the ball is going in the opposite direction.

The rate gravity slows the ball going up

is the same rate it speeds it up going down.

So now you know that freefall in physics

is when an object is only under the influence of one force,

gravity.

That's all for this segment of "Physics in Motion".

We'll see you next time.

For more practice problems, lab activities,

and note-taking guides,

check out the "Physics in Motion" Toolkit.

For more infomation >> What is Free Fall? | Physics in Motion - Duration: 6:32.

-------------------------------------------

Man facing 3 murder charges is captured in trash can after escape - Duration: 0:24.

For more infomation >> Man facing 3 murder charges is captured in trash can after escape - Duration: 0:24.

-------------------------------------------

Teal CEO #14 - Radosław Kmita: Is financial transparency a recipe for involved co-workers? - Duration: 39:28.

People who I worked with,they really cared only about their own work. They

didn't care about the work of the whole company or the whole team or my work so

I had to go to my boss to get feedback, if I'm doing the work correctly or not

and the other people were like "okay you're doing fine" but they really didn't

care they didn't want to really get involved. Everybody has a

hidden agenda: I like some goal or I want to have this customer because

this customer pays a lot and I don't have to do anything, or I was this guy

that really didn't care: I just wanted to get money and experience to get

somewhere else and the goals of the company were probably to get money and

you know get big and so on. When I was starting an organization I thought

I wouldn't like, you know, I like, I would like to have guys who are involved but

also think about the goal of the whole organization how can I do it? So I

decided that I want to build a good organization in the maximum extent of

the sport. My friends were telling me like "man you're just doing some crazy

stuff there" but I felt really great when I found out that there are, there were,

more companies like that.

So guys, Adam just presented to you some theory how it looks and some examples

how he implemented it in his company and I just had different presentation

for today but I figured that I'll change it for today and basically

just copy-paste the solutions that I have and how we do it internally because

it's really a lot of work, sorry - just a lot of work to build it, and it really,

it really works differently in my opinion and I think examples can really

explain the whole concept much better and it turned out that I kind of built this

kind of organization but I didn't know about it.

In the beginning I was just a guy that really likes data you know, thinks

about how to improve things, how to change things, how to build processes and

my experience in the past was focused more on things related to the Internet

and to traffic to Google Ads, Facebook Ads

SEO and in general the whole concept of all of the traffic that comes to the

website and what happens with it and I was valid because I could come up with

some ideas how to change things and make them work better and when it came to the

decision that I want to build my own team. I just kind of decided that I want

to have the same approach - agile approach, the same as in software

development you have agile so you will improve things all the time

so today, yeah so it turns out that after like around two years ago, I think, or one

year and a half somebody told me that it's called teal organization and there

is a book about it and it's becoming, you know, a buzzword and so I

was like okay let's read it and that kind of I really got inspired by that and

I continued into that direction and I cannot tell that it's like 100%

the organization because in even in the book they say that you

continuously go towards this goal that you want to become till more till

and more till so I say that it's like 70% or 50% teal.

So Adam explained what is teal but I will just give examples and what processes

what things we I got and together with the other guys because with time people

came and joined, some people left but the people who stayed really got

involved in that, you know, improvement and agile approach to the changes inside

of the team and how we work and you know started to run experiments on ourselves

basically. So and yeah, as Adam said there were there were many companies at the

same time that's in, you know, in the time span of 20, 30 years or even more they

thought that these companies are alone and they just came up with some

stupid idea, with crazy idea and people were thinking "oh this is it, this crazy

you know different, ideas different company that they manage themselves

differently" and I thought the same about me and my friends were telling me like "man

you are just doing some crazy stuff there and for me I was I

thought really that its, it was really strange and and but and but I felt

really great when I found out that there are, there were more companies like that

so what I've missed when I had to build, start building

organization I decided I will do it better so I missed that in the

previous place of work I had only one area of expertise so I had I was this

guy, but actually I wanted to try bits and pieces of different technologies

different things, different roles, different responsibilities so I'm a guy

that likes to be all around and try different things and then I'm motivated

and not everything is black and white and many many entrepreneurs just

think you're good or bad at your work but actually it's never like that. You

are like good in 7, you're like out of 10good things that out of ten

things that you do at work you're good at 7 and really bad at 3 so

let's cut out these 3 and just let's focus on the seven for example so it's

always something in the middle between black and white.

So there was no instant honest feedback: like people who I worked with they

really cared only about their own work they didn't care about the work of the

whole company or the whole team or my work, so I had to go to my boss to get

feedback if I'm doing the work correctly or not and the other people were like

"okay you're doing fine" but they really didn't care they didn't want to really

get in, they were involved and the 4 was unknown or irrelevant organization

goes to me so I really, when I worked I was this guy that really didn't care I

just wanted to get money and experience to get somewhere else, you know be

better at what I'm doing and the goals of the company was probably get

money and you know big get and so on and when I was starting an organization

I thought I wouldn't like you know I like I would like to have guys who are

involved but also think about the goal of the whole organization. How can I do

it? And hidden goals of colleagues, project managers, bosses everybody has a

hidden agenda I like some goal or I can, I want to have this customer because

this customer pays a lot and I don't have to do anything or you know many

many different things and everybody has some agenda behind so I decided that I

want to build a good organization in the maximum extent of this word. In my

opinion, so in my opinion it was very related to my values so it was focused

on self-realization so achieving my own goals or allowing other people to allow

to achieve their goals, so how can they build organization that will allow other

people to do it focusing on trust so that everybody could trust each other.

Happiness and fair results division so how to build this, how can I like

focus on this kind of task. So to put it in a more business sense after like

three or four years now I can like tell that back then, of course I had to focus

on high quality sales and profitability like every company, so first was high and

higher quality, growing sales, increasing profitability these are like normal

classic goals of a company. But in the same time almost on

the same level I wanted to focus on the trust, engagement, comfort of work,

self-management of entire team as well as of every team member so

that was the goal. And I think that I kind of succeeded and I even started to

kind of mentally divide it from the things that we do and how we name each

other and we kind of started to name it "performance teams". Performance

because we sell performance services, so based on the results, so as much as we

can get as a service we get that much money from a customer but also we are

internally built in a performance way. And in comparison to Adam and many

teal organizations we are kind of extreme. Because I think I exaggerated a little

bit the optimization and transparency and everything, when probably you will think

the same but I will just explain it in a second just to give you ideas. We have

like 50-70 % growth of income a year to year, it's four years and over 20 people

and I didn't have any capital at the beginning so we are just investing and

growing slowly and maybe it's not a rocket and it's not a startup but I

think we are doing pretty well and from my side and from management side the

benefits of this kind of new system that I can share with you at the moment is

that we have automated financial controlling so there doesn't have to be

a person that controls finance because everybody controls funds and finance.

Because everybody controls these are their own finance and if the finance of

this one person is okay and then times 20, then everybody, the whole company's

finance is okay to put it simple. And spend like 16 to 22 hours monthly on

just management so I think it's pretty good number that I don't have to spend

that much time on just management and we have kind of fixed to it to any percent.

But it goes down because of unpaid invoices and so on some you know typical

problems in Polish market or even international markets but we call it

even. We don't even code margin or income

which is called "safety net" because just we reuse this money to invest into

new people that we hire and even if really we have a really bad situation

project, is not profitable, we still have this margin because it's percentage

based of every project and I believe, like Adam, that these teal models,

because I kind of build my own, I kind of start to name it but there are also

other like holacracy, like different types are described in the book but I believe

that it's the future of organizations. Why ? because today we work

in highly complex, dynamic environment and if everything changes so fast, if we

have organization that can also change very fast without, you know, centralized

decision-making, I can feel it even on my skin that I have to really keep up with

the changes that are happening in just such small environment as twenty people.

And I don't know about it, I come the office, I don't know, one week and I

find out that they just implemented something that I had no clue about it and

this is a direct response to a need, to a market so if they can even start to sell

it as a separate service, so the team comes up with new things all the time

And also you know it may also seem that this kind of organizations can be

chaotic, because as Adam said in the previous part it's focused a lot of self

management so everybody has to decide on their own what they want to work

on and this can create chaos but in fact there is no chaos: it's really, it's really

dynamically adjusted and you don't feel that it's chaotic at all. And also

there are no experts in this field, this is very new thing and basically I

see that we are teal but like 75%, but nobody really can measure that basically.

So my goal for today is I would like to inspire you to experiment with

your organizations to produce more efficient and happy workers, our

co-workers, and I plan, I will describe my pitfalls the model the one that I told

you about. The one that exists in our team and also

theory versus reality: how you can, kind of, these cool things that you say in the

slides put in the reality. Okay, so this is a

classical organization the one that everybody is part of always so you've

got, you know, relationships, ex, affairs sells drugs to, jealous secret deals so

so many things. And everybody there is such crazy network and when you extend

it to the partners of the company and also customers that you have

relationship with this is becoming like crazy. And the goal is to get there. Like

to really build a net of different relationships of you know positions that

are built dynamically as an organism, like Adam said, my goal in the beginning

before I read about it was to create many CEOs of, you know, many small bosses

that takes care of different areas teams projects and of course like I am, I can

be a part of somebody else's team and there is another boss but I am boss of

my own projects, let's say so this is like I can be in like many many

different projects areas and teams and whatever I take, whatever responsibility

I take, I put 100%, so maximum engagement and also clarity what I have to deliver

and this is extremely difficult: the pitfalls, I will start with that because

to do it to really move into the direction that Adam mentioned you have

to know that you have to like there are many, many errors you can make the first

one was recruitment. You have to focus on people who really really are self-aware

they know their goals, their values and I would say this kind of engaged part it's

easier to start with them but later they can by example bring others and

also engage them to trust of course in this book and in teal organization and

management they are talking a lot about giving trust like I can I give you the

full authority to do whatever you want, to deliver that goal yeah but you have

to control. Especially in the beginning and also

second thing is, which is extremely difficult you have to start measure

distrust how we each other for example trust each other if you work together

after some time people, I can clearly say that the team stuff stops trusting this

person because he failed in this task, in that task, in this project in

that project, and they stopped giving them tasks after after some time this is

a clearing process let's say internally, but you have to

measure it to see in the numbers and then make decisions based on the

numbers and conflicts. This is really important to know yourself how to solve

conflicts in the beginning and also teach other people how to solve

conflict,s because if you can imagine in such dynamic environment when you know

many people can pick whatever project they want and it's very open and

transparent many conflicts may arise and then you have to know how to solve them.

Usually by just explaining ok so the 3 pillars that Adam mentioned so when we

destroy the pyramid so I'm not the boss anymore we are all together directing to

one direction, we want to achieve: I don't know - we want to be the best in analytics

of web services and then few people immediately start to feel that they need

to have the answers to these questions like similar to what Adam said who can

make what decisions there has to be one person. How can I make decision when this

person is not available? who is responsible for what? who can spend

money of the company? how the results are measured and discussed? what stops us

what stops us from being lazy? and who gets what salary? imagine that there are

companies and also in our case we design the salaries that we get and also in

other companies it also exists like that so probably you think that people would

pick the best the biggest higher salary and just take it but it's not the

case. So what what are the processes to answer these questions?

like also Adam said: This is advisory process one of the most

important things whatever role you take and whatever responsibilities you take

just have to think who this decision that you want to make in this role will

affect so if I am, for example, responsive or the website of the company I have to

just ask marketing department if I can change it the way I just thought that it

would be good so this is you just have to ask this person that may be

boss because he really pays a lot of attention to the website but if he

doesn't, you will tell it then you just have to ask the marketing department for

example that you know that is really, really correlated with this area and

each areas are really correlated really close to each other

and you just have to go through this advisory process and ask these people

information sharing, rows divisions so you have to divide the roles in the

proper way. Project division so you have to also

keep up who gets what project in the very dynamic way written down rules so

whatever problem conflict arise and you solve it then write it down so that

other people would know how to solve this kind of situations and fair work

results division process so you have to come up with some algorithm some some

process of dividing the invoices that come from the customer for example we

earn 10000 euros so how can we divide it in the simplest way? for example is to

check Toggle how much time we tracked and for example divide equally by the

time spent of the team members that were involved in that project for example.

This is one of the ways. Financial transparency - this also creates a lot of

information how much we can spend on different areas but it's not about

giving all the information but also how much project budget, each project has

budget, each team has budget, each area has budget left - for in for some

investments or from for some costs and how it works internally in the team so I

call it a hybrid between a being enterpreneur and also an employee.

Because in the beginning when a person comes, we evaluate their skills based on

also the matrix of skills and this person that if this person

joins the team gets evaluated in every skill: so for example this is a web

analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Ads, SEO, i don't know, web development, PHP or so on and so

on and each of these skills have had a technical leader that can evaluate and

have this his own way how to evaluate these skills and he gives a grade and

based on these grades we evaluate the the minimum amount of money that

this person will get and with time this person starts to collect different

projects and basically this is like an open marketplace of, you know

different projects that are people involved in and based on the

interactions in the office, in the in the hangouts, in the chat that people ask

each other "hey I've got a lead, I've just have this customer is there anybody free

to help me is? it anybody available to help me? and then people just connect

each other they start to work together and it's kind of creating a portfolio of

different projects so over here you can see that this is a training for Google

Apps for domain numbe. Sne domain is the name of the project implementation of

UPC domain number two, implementation strategies here on our domain number

three, so each of that is a different customer and implementations Google Ads for

domain number four, so these are customers and over here we have internal

roles that are also projects but internal not for the customer but

for the benefit of the team and over here we have for example scripts and

optimization Google Ads quality control and Google new tools tester, Google Ads and

all of that brings I'd say some value to Thomas who is a Google Ad specialist and

based on that in the beginning as I said he gets the minimum this is the

break-even point as I said evaluated based on his levels in different skill

areas and technical areas but with time based on this portfolio that he's

collecting different projects and also so based on the trust of the team

members that people start to trust him because they can see that he's a

reliable co-worker, he delivers awesome value for the customer, the customer

wants to even gets better and better results and

they even want to pay us more because it's going great and there are

no problems with the delivery of anything then he is just collecting more

and more tasks then even there is a need sometimes to have a role that will

control if he's not taking too many projects and we have to also control

that. And with time he basically becomes an enterpreneur, internal

entrepreneur who has a portfolio of projects and he gets a performance-based

salary but in the beginning when he starts, he gets the minimum number

minimum salary based on his skills that he has.

So this is a kind of hybrid and main features of the solution of the whole

this whole model is transparency and this is kind of also connected

with time because in the beginning we I just decided that I want this company to

be transparent so I will share all the information about all of the project

about the profitability, then the next came quality control. At the beginning I

was controlling the quality, later on I have to come up with ways how people

would control each other for work results division so if everything

was transparent then I have to come up with different ways how to share the

results of different projects to divide the money that is coming from the

customer in the righteous way according to the team members so that they

wouldn't, you know, there wouldn't be any conflict between each other and of

course sometimes it happens that they argue because I did that, you did that

but it's like really almost once a year seriously and even though we have

this situation that we have to divide the money coming from the customer, if we

I don't know have 100 customers then we have to do it at least 100, 250 times a

month and you can multiply it by 2 or 3 because there are at least two or three

people involved in each project so you can see how big the matrix is and how

much data we have to calculate, you know to really give out the output of how much

each person gets at the end. Dynamic, yeah dynamic responsibilities division so we

have to keep up also who is involved in what projects all the time and also in

which internal role, because if you if I would

let everybody do whatever they want they connect, we connect each other in

different project groups and nobody can really keep up who is with who and who

is responsible for what and you have to create a process how to write it down in

a really dynamic way equal rules so this is also related to this written down

processes so we have to create one, like in country law that will abide everybody

inside of the company, so there is nobody above so I cannot like break the rules

because everybody would get demotivated because you created the company, you

created the rules and now you are just you know, breaking everything. Self-

regulation - so this is another thing we have to come up with ways how to

actually I will just discuss in a second elastic rolls and self-motivation so

these are all like the main features of this model, so transparency generates

higher trust and also better and quicker decisions like Adam said that when we

have all of the information regarding customer you know partners of the

customers how the relationship went the whole history and the performance then

you can get really, you can really make better decisions and also people start

to trust each other especially they trust the CEO or the team leader however

you call it they start to trust him more because they know that he's not about

the money, they did they don't think that he makes millions out of this company

that they really see that in the really bad months or something he

doesn't really he can may not get the money that he because he's at

the end, let's say he may not get the money because if there is a bad month

for example, but but there was not. And controlling roles, plus project control:

so if we have for example projects and each project is is just two people

together working on for each customer then we have to have like controlling

roles like in the beginning I was controlling each project but with time

my time was not unlimited and I had to like switch, so I kind of distributed

this role and for example there are like 5-6 best people

we're controlling other people and we and they're controlling each other so we

just have to have a spreadsheet who controls what in both time and there is

one person responsible for like you know making it happening ,profit yeah this for

fair work without division it's about profit sharing and consuming and also

what is important: that we have to divide the costs of the company so it's not

like the cost of the company are not only for the of the whole company but

also for each project, also for each team because one team's uses this tool but

the other two team doesn't use this tool they use different one and they all want

to use this the first one so so you have to kind of have really internal system

to divide the costs and also they have to know how much they pay for each task,

for each cost, and thanks to that at the end that you can also up to optimize the

cost on themselves so that's why I said that it's regulated and they make micro

division of responsibilities and this generates natural delegation of

decision making authority and accountability. Yeah rules gives

scalability and equality scalability is very important because I had time to

like explain everything for like eight person that joined the team but I didn't

have time for the twenty, for example, and thanks to the fact that we have a lot of

workshops recorded like this one for example and also a lot of rules written

down and look one document or few documents they can just read it and just

find out about the things that we discovered in the past and just they can

just catch up with all the things how the things work and thanks to that it's

scalable. The quality and time tracking gives us financial self-regulation and

project self-regulation, financial is thank due to the fact that we know how

much customer pays and thanks to that we can know how much time we should invest

so that the project could be profitable and in the same time, project the

self-regulation works that people can change projects between each other so I

don't have to say that you should work on this project only and that's it, he

can decide whatever time he wants to switch with somebody else for example

if he's boy like if he's like tired of a customer because he has really tough

time communicating this customer he can to ask a colleague let's just switch

because you have a bad one maybe if we switch it will work better.

And this is also like a project optimization because you know thanks to

that he can know that they know how much was the profitability of the project and

again they can know and optimize themselves who works on what elastic

roles. Also each person and each team can create roles on their own so

basically if we have for example a SEO team, a SEO team for example came up I

know one year ago that they will divide the each project to two roles instead of

this one and in when they did it the productivity roles

but like 20 or 30% just by the fact that people

started to specialize in just one area of in inside of one service, that we sell

to a customer and they just came up with them without division themselves like I

didn't have to do it ultimately they didn't have to do it just it just came

out with naturally and thanks to that it's very elastic because

instead of a project you can also divide the project into different areas you

just have to write down everything and just put a name who is responsible for

what and people remember that and this gives us new methodologies, processes and

services and this has a lot of hybrid I already talked about it but to let you

know this is a lot of motivation especially to people who take care of

money quite a lot but not only, because this gives you a lot of value for

yourself that you know that you work and the hard work that you provide and your

awesome ideas that you give out they pay out because the customers really see

that, the value of this project goes up with time and you

start making more and more money and you didn't have to jump from one company to

another just negotiating with new bosses how much you want to get because you

know that your worth is quite high because how this how usually people do:

just leave company or just negotiate with the boss to get more over here the

if you are doing awesome job and the customers see that it

directly affects your salary and also it affects self-realization because

if this is a very important goal to you then people just you know achieve and

also it's really related to the fact that people look for challenges with

time and the more challenges they get and they really can transform into a

higher salary with time so coming back to the previous slide with the answers

to the questions I kind of put it together the rules that exist inside of

my model to connect it like: advisory process is part of the rules,

information sharing, is just the transparency role, division processes

this is the dynamic responsibility division, and so on so now I'll just show

you how it looks inside so to compare traditional company we've got their

organization scheme, fixed position, responsibilities fixed, titles, promotions

superiors and employees so in the old organization scheme is

replaced by dynamic map changing organization so it looks more or less

like that if I would have to imagine that but I don't have a software to

visualize it but how I visualize it I just have spreadsheets and basically

this spreadsheets are visited by everyone every day, almost every day because they

come and visit that and we who have designed roles in for example over here

these are the names of roles that are internal for the team over here we put

their names here, each person who is responsible for what usually it is one

person first is responsible for that, second is helping this person in

this problem, we have a wage of this of this role because if we treat it as a

marketplace their roles internal roles are also they also have

hourly rate assigned to it so basically it's all calculated later on

based on toggle how much people spend on each roll and over here we have projects

and we have different domains of different customers and over here we

have also division of people who are involved in this project so you have

five columns basically and this is how we split: 100%, 20%

stays in the company 80 % almost is divided between people and also over

here we can put different percentage we also have a methodology how to share the

percentage in a different way than just based on time but also based

on the impact in the project so because one person can come come up with a

strategy it will take this person two hours and the other can implement it for

eight hours by the value of the guy that came up with the strategy is much higher

than the guidance of the person that implemented it yeah and in the

traditional organizations we have fixed positions and responsibilities a new

version we have full responsibilities and authority in the chosen roles so how

it looks over here for example we have workplace by Facebook and over here

every role which is around 40 to 50 has a report by the person that takes care

of this role posted to everybody it's extremely transparent and they state

what is the role of the project how much time they spend what they achieved

in this month and what they are planning to do and achieve in the next month and

they also can get some comments and like, shares is whatever the same is on

Facebook and over here we have also the time how much time was spent this is an

example of auditing role of so the one that I talked about that we added each

other words so that we could bring more and higher and higher quality of the

work and also we've got Asana connected with this task and this person

who's responsible for that takes care of you know taking care of these tasks to

deliver whatever is inside of this role: for example this is a role office so

whoever is responsible for the office whatever is related to office and yeah

and fixed titles: so we've got precise roles in a project

or in a team, defined by team members themselves, so when I become a for

example responsible for the office I can ask some people to help me out and we

basically create really precise roles who is responsible for what inside of

this role so there is a lot of roles a lot of dividing responsibilities inside

of them. The same applies to project for the customers but it happens

automatically by the people themselves. But what is it really important to write

it down in the, in the process and the reality is of a here for example this is

a division of the responsibilities inside of analytics project for a

customer so the customers also knows who is responsible for what on our side also

it happens dynamically because people are, all of the people, connected on the

in the project from our side and also also from the customer side are in

at one channel so that they can connect, talk and it happens really really fast

that I for example can be a substitute of a person that is sick today and we

can jump in and I can see on the chat, thanks to do you know all the new

technologies and be you know instantly from a guy that's responsible for

analytics become Facebook Ads guy because there is nobody to you

know fill this space because somebody's sick for example, but usually team

members just do it between each other and this happens really

automatically this is a part of the matrix about the skills and that I

talked about in the few slides ago over here we have just technical skills,

certificates, responsibilities so we try to measure responsibilities if they take

responsibilities or not if we can trust them or not and also critical

skills. Yeah in the old system we've got promotions over here we have higher

responsibility and trust so this is also related to hybrid salary that we talked

about and that with time they, when they get when they receive higher and higher

trust inside of an organization people start to really come to these people and

just ask them to do projects together because they know that if they will work

together the project will be safe and it will

be delivered in the time and also they will achieve the goals of the customer.

And it'll be done in the best way possible and this is like an invisible

currency but trust plays a huge role in that and I don't know like we I have

some measure some way to measure that but basically it happens like

without seeing it and I can see that by by the

salaries that people get and just people some people are just so good at the work

that people just get around them and they really want to give them the best

projects. And also another way is to build internal project because some

people to sell to achieve self-realization one of the goals is for

example to fund their own company, their own agency and for example a case is

that the guys just decided to focus and build separate brand focusing only on

analytics so they and when you build this kind of internal team then you get

49% of sure and 51 is this let's say the whole company's sure because we want to

maintain that financial control and also they can take the project that were

developed already inside of other teams and we have already like four or five

teams like that three of three other teams in the last two years failed,

because of the lack of the right leadership but four are doing quite okay

at the moment so it's not only one team which is called MTA Digital, this is

the one that I found it but there are already some other teams internal teams

inside of these 20 people and we also treat it as a role in one role we are in

one team in another role we are in another team, and we just switch by

emails. Yeah in old version we had superiors and employees now we have team

leader and team members and over here you can see that it's a lot of

doing dailies and meetings over here, it's a lot of workshops and a lot of

one-on-ones to deliver this value and deliver and we really find out who is

motivated by what and how can i connect who is motivated by what to with

whatever we can do inside of the company to achieve you know their

own personal goals. And that will be all. Thank you!

Sorry for breaking little bit up but I'm not used to public speaking that much so

thanks!

For more infomation >> Teal CEO #14 - Radosław Kmita: Is financial transparency a recipe for involved co-workers? - Duration: 39:28.

-------------------------------------------

This museum is rich with local African American history - Duration: 5:17.

For more infomation >> This museum is rich with local African American history - Duration: 5:17.

-------------------------------------------

Arsenal news: Emery is the right man in charge but he must make these changes - Ince - Duration: 1:53.

That is the view of Paul Ince who said on Match of the Day that Arsenal have an ageing squad that can't deal with absentees.

That coupled with a leaky defence and a goalkeeper whom they don't seem to trust.

The Gunners lost 3-1 at Manchester City on Sunday afternoon with the champions opening the scoring in under 60 seconds.

Unai Emery tried in vain to recruit over the January transfer window with midfielder Denis Suarez the only arrival.

Ince was asked what Arsenal have to do to in order to put themselves back in the mix for the top four and challenge for the title.

He replied: "They've got to spend some money. That's the first thing they've got to do.

"Wrighty's (Ian Wright) just mentioned about their goalkeeper - they don't seem to have a lot of confidence in him.

"But I look at the back four and they're an ageing team, for me, the back four.

"They've got a few injuries out, but they're an ageing team.

"So if you're going to get close to those Liverpools, Man Citys, even Man United and Tottenham. They're so far away they'll have to spend money to compete."

Liverpool's title challenge this term has come off the back of considerable investment in the summer on the likes of Alisson and Fabinho.

Whilst Tottenham's failure to realise their potential has been put down to a lack of funds available to Mauricio Pochettino.

Ince feels Emery is the right man to lead the Gunners but the Spaniard will need backing if he is to lessen the gulf between them and the league's elite.

He continued: "I think they've got the right manager in charge, I really, really believe that.

"They stated the season so well, unbeaten in 22 matches, but they've got to spend a lot of money if they're going to bridge that gap."

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét