Waching daily Feb 16 2019

This is an exciting day!

Not only because the watch time of this channel sky rocketed last weekend.

But also because it's Nanook's third birthday!

This is A Kind of Adventurous Life.

Hi! My name is Kirikou, and who are you?

My name is Nanook!

Yes, he is. But where is Nanook?

That is one of the most asked questions on this channel.

I'm in Hungary.

And where's Kirikou? - Kirikou is in Finland as always.

Yes. Unfortunately I can't be in Hungary to celebrate Nanook's third birthday -

but we can all celebrate it through this video.

Hi! My name is Nanook!

How old are you Nanook? - One, two, three... Three!

Happy Birthday dear Nanook, -

Happy Birthday to you!

Well done!

My name is Nanook.

This video is my birthday video.

Here's a flower picture.

Two flowers.

I put these on the table too.

Big. - What is it?

Device.

More flowers.

A flower.

Flowers.

How many there are?

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6. Six.

N - A - N - O - O - K

Nanook!

One, two, three. Three!

Number three. Because I turn three.

Tiger suitcase.

We're going together to Finland.

When do we go to Finland? - At 10 time.

This one's sick.

This one's not sick.

This one's not sick.

This one's not sick.

Now we'll go to Finland!

The other interesting this week is -

the sudden rise in our subscriber count.

It has doubled and now we have more than 13000 subscribers!

Thank you every single one of you!

In our next video Nanook will travel to Finland, -

and we'll play in the snow together.

With you, and him, and me.

And my dad. He won't play. He's too old for that.

He says...

Thank you for watching! Remember to brush your teeth, -

celebrate your favourite brother's birthday, and not trip over when playing volleyball.

Yeah. If you were wondering, that's why I had the crutches.

Thank you for watching!

See you soon again!

For more infomation >> Nanook is THREE YEARS OLD - Duration: 4:21.

-------------------------------------------

[烏克蘭什麼,What Is Ukraine]亞細亞的孤兒 - Duration: 2:00.

For more infomation >> [烏克蘭什麼,What Is Ukraine]亞細亞的孤兒 - Duration: 2:00.

-------------------------------------------

Californias bullet train is down, and readers are still kicking it Los Angeles Times - Duration: 4:17.

Californias bullet train is down, and readers are still kicking it Los Angeles Times

Among our letter writers who like to use California as a political punching bag and there are more than a few , nothing has better reflected what they see as the states total dysfunction than the serially delayed, budget exploding high speed rail system. Now, with Gov. Gavin Newsom in his first State of the State address that the bullet train, at least for the moment, will be dramatically scaled back from the long envisioned link between Los Angeles and San Francisco to the 110 mile Central Valley segment already under construction, readers are not letting up with their criticism.

While the idea of a north south bullet train has its defenders, as does the truncated Central Valley version, most of the few dozen readers who have written to us on this topic since Newsom made his announcement have either praised the governor or wondered why he did not completely halt construction.

The fate of high speed rail in California may be uncertain, but this is not: With so much ink having already been spilled about this project since Proposition 1A passed in 2008, this will not be the last well hear from readers about the bullet train.

James Regan of Carlsbad sums up the standard arguments against high speed rail in California:

Bravo to Newsom for getting real about this project. For three reasons, the proposed high speed rail system in California could never be successful.

First, the distance between Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay Area is too great; second, the geological barriers are too severe; and third, the customer base is too small.

The revised proposal, to stick with a shorter line between Merced and Bakersfield, avoids the first two problems. But its pretty obvious there will never be enough paying customers to justify spending billions on that small Central Valley segment.

The entire boondoggle needs to be halted.

Los Alamitos residents Dan Schechter and Felice Sussman dont want to throw good money after bad:

Newsom said that if we do not finish the bullet train, we will have wasted billions of dollars with nothing but broken promises.

This is a classic example of a sunk cost fallacy: a possibly irrational decision to pursue a wasteful project, simply to avoid stranding the sunk costs.

The real issue is whether the anticipated expenditures are justified by the anticipated benefits, without factoring in unrecoverable past expenditures. When will we see that analysis?

Hal Dale of Malibu believes the infrastructure does not exist to make a bullet train work:

Yes, the mass use of a bullet train in California could ease global warming, but it wont appeal to potential riders until we build European style city infrastructure. Compare a Parisian going to the Bundestag in Berlin with me going to a meeting in San Francisco.

The Parisian walks a quarter mile to his Metro stop, then for less than 2 Euros reaches the East Paris train station, which has multiple fast trains to Berlin, whereupon another underground line takes him to his destination.

I, on the other hand, must drive at least 45 minutes to Union Station, pay at least dollar 8 per day to park, hope that I can find one of the trips that fits my schedule, and then take a cab to my meeting in San Francisco.

Good infrastructure must exist before mass use of train travel can help us with climate change.

Raymond Johnson of Santa Monica wants a freeway upgrade:

Actually, there is a fast, reliable way to San Francisco, but it has been neglected. It was built in the 1970s but is now outdated. It is named the Interstate 5.

Even on the 5, a driver can get from San Francisco to Los Angeles in less than six hours. If the 5 is expanded from its current two lanes in each direction to four, it would have two lanes for cars and two for trucks.

Plus, we already own the land.

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter and

For more infomation >> Californias bullet train is down, and readers are still kicking it Los Angeles Times - Duration: 4:17.

-------------------------------------------

[리뷰IS] '전참시' 정우성·이영자, 1세기 뛰어넘은 인연 그리고 떨림 - Duration: 2:57.

정우성과 이영자가 '전지적 참견시점 을 통해 1세기를 뛰어넘는 만남이 사됐다. 먹음직스 운 먹방과 함께 분 좋은 떨림을 해준 순간이었다. 16일 방송된 M C '전지적 참견 점'에는 정우성이 이영자와 송성호 니저를 영화 '증 ' 시사회에 초대 모습이 그려졌다 시사회에 가기 이영자는 눈 화 에 신경을 썼다. 평소 정우성이 눈 마주치면서 인사 고 대화하기에 눈 화장에 각별한 신 을 기울인 것.  디어 만남이 이뤄 다. 정우성은 " 세기 만에 만나는 것이다. 20세기 때 보고 21세기 보게 됐다"면서 반갑게 인사했다. 그리곤 정우성이 영자에게 식사를 께하자고 제안했다  낙지 가게를 찾 다. '먹교수'답 이영자는 자신의 먹는 비법을 가득 담은 낙지 비빔밥 로 정우성의 마음 훔쳤다. 정우성 연신 "맛있다" "어떻게 낙지가 직 살아 있냐" 달다"면서 감탄사 쏟아냈다.  정 성은 "함께 식사 고 싶어하는 사람 많을 것 같다. 새치기를 받아줘서 감사하다"고 인사 다. 보는 내내 윗한 모습으로 이 자를 배려했고, 영자는 그런 정우 을 바라보며 설렘 떨림을 감추지 했다. 여기에 정 성의 배려심 깊은 모습이 매니저의 언을 통해 하나둘 공개되며 훈훈함을 배가시켰다. "누 가가 바라는 정우 이 되기보다 내가 원하는 정우성이 기 위해 끊임없이 노력하고 있다"는 발언에 이영자는 생각하는 대로 사 사람이 바로 정 성"이라고 치켜세 다. 1세기를 뛰 넘은 인연이 기분 좋은 떨림으로 주 안방극장을 물들 다. 황소영 기자 hwang.soy ung@jtbc. o.kr 

For more infomation >> [리뷰IS] '전참시' 정우성·이영자, 1세기 뛰어넘은 인연 그리고 떨림 - Duration: 2:57.

-------------------------------------------

I Just Wanna Date Someone, Anyone Is Fine! [SSB Parody PV] - Duration: 1:06.

I just wanna date someone, anyone is fine

I just wanna date someone, anyone is fine

Somebody, anybody's alright!

Talking with the guys, it's as easy as can be

But then I get too nervous if a girl should talk to me

I've always had to carry this traumatic history...

And even just to think about it - how embarrassing!

God, I'm such a loser, I can't even get a date...

"But I don't understand, your personality is great!"

I always get my hopes up and I ask them out at once-

"I don't think that's a good idea..." I'm really such a dunce!

I just wanna date someone, anyone is fine

Somebody, anybody's alright!

I just wanna date someone, anyone is fine...

all he needs is love, love

love is all he needs

help him

how can u resist that pure face. give him a call

For more infomation >> I Just Wanna Date Someone, Anyone Is Fine! [SSB Parody PV] - Duration: 1:06.

-------------------------------------------

Elms College is hosting an "Innovation Challenge" to determine solutions for bullying - Duration: 1:53.

For more infomation >> Elms College is hosting an "Innovation Challenge" to determine solutions for bullying - Duration: 1:53.

-------------------------------------------

Californias bullet train is down, and readers are still kicking it Los Angeles Times - Duration: 3:47.

Californias bullet train is down, and readers are still kicking it Los Angeles Times

Among our letter writers who like to use California as a political punching bag and there are more than a few , nothing has better reflected what they see as the states total dysfunction than the serially delayed, budget exploding high speed rail system. Now, with Gov. Gavin Newsom in his first State of the State address that the bullet train, at least for the moment, will be dramatically scaled back from the long envisioned link between Los Angeles and San Francisco to the 110 mile Central Valley segment already under construction, readers are not letting up with their criticism.

While the idea of a north south bullet train has its defenders, as does the truncated Central Valley version, most of the few dozen readers who have written to us on this topic since Newsom made his announcement have either praised the governor or wondered why he did not completely halt construction.

The fate of high speed rail in California may be uncertain, but this is not: With so much ink having already been spilled about this project since Proposition 1A passed in 2008, this will not be the last well hear from readers about the bullet train.

James Regan of Carlsbad sums up the standard arguments against high speed rail in California:

Bravo to Newsom for getting real about this project. For three reasons, the proposed high speed rail system in California could never be successful.

First, the distance between Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay Area is too great; second, the geological barriers are too severe; and third, the customer base is too small.

The revised proposal, to stick with a shorter line between Merced and Bakersfield, avoids the first two problems. But its pretty obvious there will never be enough paying customers to justify spending billions on that small Central Valley segment.

The entire boondoggle needs to be halted.

Los Alamitos residents Dan Schechter and Felice Sussman dont want to throw good money after bad:

Newsom said that if we do not finish the bullet train, we will have wasted billions of dollars with nothing but broken promises.

This is a classic example of a sunk cost fallacy: a possibly irrational decision to pursue a wasteful project, simply to avoid stranding the sunk costs.

The real issue is whether the anticipated expenditures are justified by the anticipated benefits, without factoring in unrecoverable past expenditures. When will we see that analysis?

Hal Dale of Malibu believes the infrastructure does not exist to make a bullet train work:

Yes, the mass use of a bullet train in California could ease global warming, but it wont appeal to potential riders until we build European style city infrastructure. Compare a Parisian going to the Bundestag in Berlin with me going to a meeting in San Francisco.

The Parisian walks a quarter mile to his Metro stop, then for less than 2 Euros reaches the East Paris train station, which has multiple fast trains to Berlin, whereupon another underground line takes him to his destination.

I, on the other hand, must drive at least 45 minutes to Union Station, pay at least dollar 8 per day to park, hope that I can find one of the trips that fits my schedule, and then take a cab to my meeting in San Francisco.

Good infrastructure must exist before mass use of train travel can help us with climate change.

Raymond Johnson of Santa Monica wants a freeway upgrade:

Actually, there is a fast, reliable way to San Francisco, but it has been neglected. It was built in the 1970s but is now outdated. It is named the Interstate 5.

Even on the 5, a driver can get from San Francisco to Los Angeles in less than six hours. If the 5 is expanded from its current two lanes in each direction to four, it would have two lanes for cars and two for trucks.

Plus, we already own the land.

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter and

For more infomation >> Californias bullet train is down, and readers are still kicking it Los Angeles Times - Duration: 3:47.

-------------------------------------------

Cute is not enough ❤️ Cute and Funny English Bulldogs doing funny things # 2 (2019)| Animal Lovers - Duration: 11:19.

Thank you for watching

We hop you will enjoy every moment watching this video

Please LIKE, SHARE and SUBSCRIBE

Just tell us what you want to see, we will try to made it available. Hope to receive more comment from you all!