Presenter: The next question is from Sprinter:
"Valeriy Viktorovich, what is the fate of the Fed, the ECB, other central banks and the banking system in general in the plans of the GP?
Are the GP connected somehow with the foundation of the FED in 1913? If they are, then what was their purpose?
If the GP in the XIX century already perceived the bourgeois capitalism as a threat to the GP themselves,
and that it was necessary to replace it with something else (for that reason they started propagating Marxism),
then why was it necessary to support the development of all these Central Banks?
Or were it state "elites" who did it, but the GP simply fit this process into their plans
and brought the banking system as well as the whole bourgeois capitalism to the point of absurdity?"
Valeriy Pyakin: The Fed is exceptionally the creation of the GP.
State "elites" are interested to possess their own state banks.
You are not interested in things you don't control within another state.
You are interested to seize control.
When you set a goal to take some foreign Central Bank under control, it means that you acquire supranational functions, and expand your influence.
The global financial credit system is exceptionally the diocese of GP with no strangers allowed.
Everyone who wants to enter this system as a subject (the one who is planning to govern) is immediately eliminated,
even through a world war if needed.
Anyway, the US Central Bank was created through the civil war in the US (so called war of North and South).
And it was the foundation of the united CB, the main goal of the civil war in the US,
but not some other minor interests like industrial ones, slave liberation or something else.
Nothing of the kind! The main goal was the united Central Bank for the whole America.
Why does the whole world need the united Central Bank?
Because the global financial credit system is the blood of the economy.
What is Globalization?
It is an objective process concentrating the governance of productive forces on Earth.
But if the globalisation is an objective process, it can be governed subjectively.
So the advantage goes to the one who sets the task of governing this objective process first.
The Global Predictor has set a target of controlling this objective process earlier, being aware that as soon as…
Here let us take the two systems that exist - Russia and Japan.
Until they lived not knowing about each other, they had not influenced each other.
As soon as they got in contact, a mutual influence started.
In this influence, a more powerful system suppresses a weaker system in one way or another.
Thus, globalization goes on around the world.
Therefore, states that are more powerful are encroaching weaker states;
unions of states that are more powerful are overwhelming standalone states and less powerful unions.
In this way an overwhelming globalization goes on.
Therefore, the world financial credit system is a leverage of controlling all the processes on planet Earth.
When somebody says about a political decision (whether in Russia, Japan or in Germany – although in any other country),
it is necessary to consider not only the own opportunities and resources, but also the way one is integrated within the world financial credit system.
In this regard, the principal importance has the status of the Central Bank inside the country.
We used to have a State Bank in the Soviet Union that focused on the state and national interests.
Therefore the country was developing: the interest rate did not exceed three percent, and the energy availability growth was five percent.
That is to say that those three percent were easy to master.
However, it's not possible to handle the interest rate above five percent (what the world energy availability trend allows) –
– you will always be in debts, and your monetary system will be eroding.
What did our Central Bank do?
Our Central Bank purposely deprived our economy of the domestic credit and made it dependent on the West.
Completely. The West drives our economy.
That is why we have the "best head of the Central Bank", according to the world media publications rating of the banking institutions.
Why? Because the Fed that prescribes to all what to do, took a decision to lower our Ruble – Nabiullina immediately lowered it and reported.
Of course, she is "the best", as she does not care at all about the interests of Russia.
It would be even better, if after her activity in Russia only ruins remain – she works on this.
This is her target – to destroy Russia's population, starve the people and introduce destruction,
because the target of hers is aligned to the interests of her western masters.
They have put her in to fulfil this task.
The Central Bank in another country fulfills a different task.
Nevertheless, they all are working according to the same scheme.
Because if domestic policy serves the ruling layer interests inside the state and the foreign policy provides
the policy of the ruling layer (of this state) externally, then the global policy defines the role and place of every state in the world.
That is why there are countries that live comfortably being tourist attraction centers, others – being financial centers,
third countries host dirty production facilities, forth are solely producers of products, fifths – provide natural resources.
Therefore, everyone has its own task. This is like in the house – every room has its functionality.
This is what the global policy defines.
To prevent people from sorting this out, a dummy-term was introduced - "geopolitics".
Moreover, our polit-dollies run around crazy with this term, even grateful to the "white sahib" from London:
"Oh, thank you that you put us up to it – told us that there geopolitics exists!"
Being put in the sandbox and given a toy. Therefore, they are playing.
Anyways, instead of fighting for all the countries one can simply govern them.
But to do so, they had to subdue these countries to their financial credit system.
They had to consolidate the industrial (production) capacity of these countries
(and the economic capacity overall, including scientific, educational and cultural potential) into a single governance system.
And this is what the two world wars (that in fact were just one world war held in two stages) seeked to achieve.
The 1913 marked the creation of the Federal Reserve System: the non-state banks that started financing the US.
The US entered the world war with a $6 billion debt to Europe.
By the end of this war it was Europe who owed the USA $10 billion. That's it, the problem was solved.
But the whole segment fell out of this war - Europe and Russia.
And this means, another war should have been held.
This was achieved and in 1944 the world financial credit system was created - Bretton Woods system.
The Soviet Union participated in this process.
It's a different story, however, that the Soviet Union did not agree to the terms of this system.
Those who agreed to these terms got enslaved by the USA, which is the instrument of the Global Predictor.
They had to wait a long time until Stalin's policy for the construction of socialism and communism in one country and the socialist commonwealth completely faded away.
It took them a while to get rid of the Soviet Union and get back to the plan of creating a world financial credit system.
Now we are part of this system and, whether you want it or not, we have to take it into consideration.
Every political decision within the country is now to be coordinated with the possible effect on the whole economy.
Because our economy can be "switched off" from abroad.
Stalin's legacy system, Soviet system, was above all that.
The two segments of the economy cooperated and interrelated with their goals.
Post-Stalin Soviet government did A LOT to bring its economy to the feet of the Global Predictor.
The surrender was signed in the January of 1968 - agreement with Lena Goldfields, we spoke about it previously.
Presenter: By the way, you can find out more about this question in the analytical note by the Foundation for Conceptual Technologies
"RF Central Bank Law and the Sovereignty of Russia" that is also an integrated part of the book "On the World of Crooked Mirrors".
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét