Hello and welcome to This Week in Social Justice
I'm Daisy Cousens and I'll be discussing all the biggest and baddest social
justice fails of the past seven days. This week we have why Katy Perry is in
the SJW bad books again why so-called thin privilege is suddenly
a thing and depending on how long I feel like talking about the first two topics
we may even get time for a bonus topic. So let's get started. But while I have
your attention hit that subscribe button if you haven't
already it really, really helps me out when you do that and I would love it if
you did. Ok here we go.
Singer and occasional feminist Katy Perry is the latest celebrity to slide
onto the social justice blacklist. Why? Well apparently the latest release in
her line of designer shoes is racist. Following the February 2019 of racism
being the new misogyny and white privilege being the new toxic
masculinity -- Katy has been accused of promoting blackface on her new pumps and
sandals. This would seem particularly rich considering she also released a
beige and a gold version of the shoes which closely resemble an Anglo face. But
clearly blackface is in vogue at the moment amongst the sjw's squadrons
because hey they've gone through everything else and are looking for a
fresh take on how to be offended by trivia. After the usual outrage brigade
took to Twitter to voice their displeasure, Katy released a statement
"The Rue and The Ora were part of a collection that was released last summer
in nine different colorways and envisioned as a nod to modern art and
surrealism. I was saddened when it was brought to my attention that it was
being compared to painful images reminiscent of blackface. Our intention
was never to inflict any pain. We have immediately removed them from Katy Perry
collections dot com." And so Katy Perry's design branch has become yet another
company who has mistaken what happens on Twitter as an accurate reflection of
public opinion, capitulated to the cry bullies and pulled a product that by
anyone else's standards really is just a shoe. This incident follows a sweater
released by Gucci which drew Iowan the same Twitter crowd projected their
blackface fantasy onto it even though it only covers half
face and just like Katy Perry, Gucci released a groveling apology and pulled
the otherwise innocuous sweater from the shelves. "Gucci deeply apologizes for the
offence caused by the wool balaclava jumper. We can confirm that the item has
been immediately removed from our online store and all physical stores. We
consider diversity to be a fundamental value to be fully upheld, respected and
at the forefront of every decision we make. We are fully committed to
increasing diversity throughout our organization and turning this incident
into a powerful learning moment for the Gucci team and beyond." Look poor Katy
this isn't the first time she's been in the firing line of the race fantasy
militia. In 2013 she was accused of cultural appropriation after dressing as
a Geisha during her performance at the American Music Awards the same year she
was harangued for dressing her backup dancers as mummies with heavily padded
bodies varying accentuated breasts, full red lips and cartoonishly large rear
ends on her prismatic world tour. While this was quite obviously intended to be
a statement about plastic surgery it didn't escape the screeches. Callie
Beusman of Jezebel stated that the consensus was that the end result looked
like hyper sexualized caricatures of black women's bodies. " A co-worker pointed
out to me that it's possible that this was meant to be a statement about
plastic surgery -- women bandaged up after getting implants
and lip injections, etc. That just reads very wrong regardless of intent though
these get-ups really do look like yet another attempt to commodify stereotyped
black female sexuality." Okay here's the thing public figures and companies need
to stop taking Twitter so seriously it is not real life it is a regressive
lefty safe space and consists of a comparatively small amount of very noisy
people who tweet 90 times or more a day about how terrible so-called oppressed
groups should think their lives are. They are so miserable that they want to
project that onto everyone else because they hate fun and they can't stand to
see other people enjoying themselves. Most people are not like that most
people couldn't care less about a shoe with eyes and a mouth on it or an ugly
sweater with a mouth design or a pop star dressed as a Geisha. I mean I didn't
even know Katy Perry made shoes until I made this video. I am waiting in
joyful anticipation for the day someone in Katy Perry's position stands up to
these noisy Twitter battalions and tells them where to stick it.
And while there would be much noisy outrage as a result I guarantee their
sales would go through the roof because of the majority of ordinary people
silently cheering them on from the sidelines. Enormous social justice fail
on this issue. The fat positivity movement has raged its way through the
intersectionality Oppression Olympics for a number of years now it's even
prompted its own label for larger ladies. However there is a certain complacency
to the movement that most people find quite perplexing. That is the total
acceptance of obesity and the insistence that you can be healthy at any size.
Which is just false. Nevertheless the fat acceptance movement continues to bubble
away in the halls of social justice rearing its head occasionally. This time
it's in a video by the BBC which was circulated on social media. "Thin
privilege now it's not a mythical creature or something made up if you're
thin you have a certain privilege. To everyday tasks but a thinner person can
take for granted they can leave a plus sized person like myself feeling full of
anxiety, burden and upset. Feeling as though they don't belong and don't deserve a place on the Earth.
So, public transport. What a nightmare for plus sized people. Just think, can you sit in a seat and not be met with sighs. Shopping, can you go to
99.9% of the high street and shop try on and take an outfit away that very same
day and not actually be able to go and enjoy the experience of shopping.
Grabbing something to eat just things can you pop into a bakery pick up a
doughnut and sit them and then enjoy it and not
feel that you're met with stares or comment. I cannot do that. Going to the
doctors. Are you able to go be seen and diagnose what is actually wrong with you
or the appointment turns into a weigh-in session. Okay I'm sure most of you are
expecting me to say what rubbish I think thin privilege is and how this girl
should just lose weight etc etc. However she's actually correct in her
assumptions just not in the way she outlines it in the video. What she
describes are less the results of thin privilege and more the results of fat
consequences. There also struggles that are not universal to fat people I mean
I'm a reasonably thin person and I don't always necessarily enjoy the experience
of shopping because clothes don't always fit or look good no matter what size you
are. But she's not mistaken in her assertion that thin privilege exists. It
does. But it's more bound up in what I like to call hot privilege. There is
plenty of evidence to suggest that conventionally attractive people have on
average easier lives than those who are less conventionally attractive
especially in the case of women. And while it's unfair it's totally primal.
Our brains perceive beautiful people as healthier and in the case of women more
fertile which makes it somewhat easier for beautiful women to attract a mate.
Pretty people are also beneficiaries of the halo effect. That is their
aesthetically pleasing veneer influences people around them to perceive them as
funnier, more likeable and more interesting. They also tend to be more
confident, they perform better in job interviews and a seen as more persuasive.
In the case of being fat or thin specifically fat people are most
definitely at a disadvantage. Fat people especially women are perceived as lazy,
incompetent, unattractive, lacking in willpower and to blame for their excess
weight and also they're considered a genetic risk for anyone searching for a
mate. They are also less likely to get promoted at work and they are even on
average paid less than thin people. For example in 2016, researchers at the
University of Exeter found that a woman who was a stone heavier would on average
earn 1500 pounds less a year than a comparable woman of the
height. Overweight people also work longer hours, are considered less
qualified for leadership positions and are expected to be less successful. Now
I'm not saying that all pretty people have wonderful lives or that all fat and
unattractive people have terrible lives but on average it's clear that thin and
pretty people have a distinct advantage in all levels of society and as I have
said before hot privilege is the only privilege that matters because it is
proven to be able to give you a leg up both professionally and personally and
it also masks a whole lot of personality flaws. So this actually isn't as much of
a social justice fail as usual, just simply the BBC went around explaining
themselves the wrong way. Unfortunately I have talked so long about the first two
topics that we can't fit in a bonus topic otherwise we would be here all day.
But tune in next time because who knows you might get lucky. If you like that
video please remember to like, subscribe, share leave me a comment and if you
really really liked it then check out the video description for my Subscribe Star
link and other ways you can support me.


For more infomation >> Climate Change Is A Real National Emergency | Velshi & Ruhle | MSNBC - Duration: 5:23. 

For more infomation >> Lindsey Graham Is About To Throw It All Away In Order To Protect Trump From Russia Probe - Duration: 1:06. 





Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét