Waching daily May 29 2018

WANG: Hello, and welcome to this YouTube live event sponsored by the Acoustical Society of America

or the ASA. My name is Lily Wang and I'm a professor in the

Durham School of Architectural Engineering Construction and an

associate dean in the college of Engineering at the University of

Nebraska-Lincoln. I'm also the current ASA a

president-elect and I am excited to be the moderator for today's event. It is

April 25th 2018 and we are here to support International Noise Awareness

Day or INAD 2018. INAD was founded in 1996 by the Center of Hearing and Communication

with a goal to raise awareness of the effects of noise on the

health and welfare of individuals and populations worldwide and this year ASA

is excited to be engaging in INAD for the first time. We've been campaigning

over the past month through our website exploresound.org and social media

outlets to grow support for INAD, encouraging people to measure noise at

restaurants with the free iOS app SoundPrint, to watch the recently released

film "In Pursuit of Silence," and to submit questions about noise that we are happy

to address today during this two-hour long YouTube live event. I'm thrilled to

introduce our panel of five experts who will be discussing all things related to

noise today. First let me welcome Dr. Arlene Bronzaft, who is a Professor

Emeritus of the City University of New York and serves on the board of GrowNYC

overseeing its noise activities. Dr. Bronzaft is a researcher, writer and

consultant on the adverse effects of noise on mental and physical health.

Arlene thanks for joining us today. BRONZAFT: Thanks for hosting us today. I am very pleased

to be here today. I was at the first INAD when Nancy and I work to put this together at

the Center for hearing and Communications and so it's delightful

that we're still pursuing the need for a lower decibel level

in our world. I don't know if I should have said "delightful" maybe we should

have accomplished it, but at least we're moving in the right direction. So I am, I

do research, I write, I lecture on the effects of noise, particularly on the

effects of noise on children's learning. WANG: Excellent, Thank you so much. Next we have

Bennett Brooks who is president of Brooks Acoustics Corporation, a

consulting firm that has provided engineering, design, and testing services

in the fields of environmental and industrial noise control, architectural

acoustics, and quiet product design. Welcome Bennett.

BROOKS: Thank you Lily. Glad to be here at this International Noise Awareness Day video conference. Welcome to everyone who's here.

WANG: Thanks. I'm also pleased to introduce William Murphy, a Captain in the United States Public Health Service

Commissioned Corps and Coordinator for the hearing loss prevention cross-sector

for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. He's an

active member of the National Hearing Conservation Association and currently

the chair of the ASA's Technical Committee for Noise so thanks for being

here Bill. MURPHY: thanks for having me I'm broadcasting from my car for those who

are wondering why he's sitting in his car it's because I'm at an Air Force

Base attending a meeting for the Hearing Center of Excellence talking about noise

issues for auditory and vestibular research that's being conducted within

the Department of Defense. I work at NIOSH in Cincinnati at

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base today and it's really a pleasure to be a part

of this and to participate in this activity. WANG: Thanks Bob. the next panelist is

Dr. Peggy Nelson, a professor of audiology and the Department of

Speech-Language Hearing Sciences at the University of Minnesota. She's currently

the founding director of the University of Minnesota's new Center for Applied and

Translational Sensory Science where she oversees interdisciplinary research and

vision, hearing, balance, and tinnitus. Welcome, Peggy. NELSON: Thanks, it's really

exciting to be here today. This is very 21st century, very fun and it's good to

be on the panel with all of you. Thanks very much. WANG: Thank you, and our fifth

finalist is Dr. Brigitta Schulte-Fortkamp, a professor at the Technical

University of Berlin in Germany. Her research focuses on supportive acoustic

environments and sound scapes and currently she is serving as Vice

President of the European Acoustics Association and as project leader in

establishing an international standard on measurements of soundscape so thanks

for being here being here Brigitta. SCHULTE-FORTKAMP: Hi Lily, thank you so much to invite

me to this panel and I'm very happy to join this panel and I would like to say

that I introduced the Noise Awareness Day to Germany twenty years ago and so

we are celebrating together with you, with us here, the Noise Awareness Day in

Germany. WANG: Wonderful, thank you very much. So for the next two hours we're going to try

to address many of the questions that have been submitted by the public over

the past month and all of you who are tuned in to this live event you are also

welcome to submit questions and comments through the chat box on our YouTube page

and we'll do our best to accommodate as many of those as possible. The course of

our discussion is expected to follow this outlines. So we're planning to try

to cover a little bit on each of these topics. First what is noise? Talking about

noise sources, causes noise, etc. Secondly, why is noise bad, why can it be bad, and

what are some of the adverse impacts of noise that we know about. Third, what have

we been doing about noise? Like to hear about some of the successful actions

that have been taken to lessen impacts of noise and Fourthly, we'd like to talk about

noise and technology. So, to start with the first question, which is what is

noise, what are some noise sources and causes of noise that all of us in communities

should become more aware of. I'd like to ask each of our panelists to share their

own perspectives on this question. And we didn't plan on who was going to answer

first so, who would like to start us off? BRONZAFT: I'll start. WANG: Thank you. BRONZAFT: I used to define noise, I'm a psychologist, as

unwanted, uncontrollable, unpredictable sound, but I'm changing that definition

thanks to my 12 year old grandson, who lives near aircraft noise and it is

wakened by aircraft noise early in the morning practically every day. When I

asked him what is noise, he said harmful sounds and that's the point which I

think we should define noise, "noise, while it is unpredictable, uncontrollable, an

unpredictable sound, I think in 2018 we now know that that sound can be harmful

to our ears, to our body, and to our mind. WANG: Thank You Arlene. Somebody else be

willing to share their perspectives on what noise is, and maybe the sources of

noise that you are most familiar with and that you've had an opportunity to

study. BROOKS: sure I can jump in. Thank You Lily. The classical legal definition of noise

is unwanted sound. So that brings up the question as to who wants it or who

doesn't want it and so that that can broaden it out quite a bit.

Perhaps we should include the broader definition that Arlene just mentioned

which is a harmful sound. Again, who is it harming? There are many examples of

sounds that we don't like in most cases, but it may depend on the context

whether we would think of it as something like noise which would be a

waste of the energy that's in the sound or it might be something useful to us. A

quick example would be car horns and traffic in in a city. People beeping

horns. Most people don't like car horns most of the time however if if you

happen to be a person who's crossing the street and looking the other way when a

car is coming and the car horn beeps at you, it might save your life so that

in that sense that sound might be noise to some people who aren't

involved in that situation, but to you, it may be a

lifesaver. It may be a very useful resource ,so I think it depends on the

context. We need to be very careful about the context and that I know Brigitta can

weigh in on that because that is part of the sound scape technique and

concept. If we look at sound in the context, certainly if it's causing harm,

if it's causing hearing damage, if it's causing health effects, yes that is

harmful. We call that noise without question.

In other cases, something happening in an urban environment from, you know a

situational context then it may be considered happy by some people. People

like to go out to cafes in the evening. That may be noise to someone. It could be

harming them even and so as it's noise to them certainly, but is it noise to the

other people who are enjoying it and then the sounds of nature that could be

very soothing and very serene for people. Other times it might not be so it, I

think it depends very much on the context. SCHULTE-FORTKAMP: Can I step in and continue here?

Thank you very much Bennett for all this perspective you gave and I think it's, to

me it's very important what you said and also was Arlene was saying because there

is one thing we have to consider that we have to see the noise, the reaction to

say, sound pressure level, or let us call noise or sound, unwanted sound it's very

much related to the person itself. It's kind of the context, it's kind of the

situation the person was educated, it's kind of the situation a person is living

in, and it's kind of also when we only think about the sounds or that we will be

noises, it's related to their functions. This is really what you said before. It's

always depending on context and if you go to consider this,

eventually by research. So we have always to define what kind of, you know, focus we

are setting to discuss this very important issue. NELSON: If I could jump in.

I just would want people to remember for people who have hearing loss or for people who

are unfamiliar with a language or for children who are basically learning

everything, there's more noise than the rest of us think in the environment so

noise is more intrusive at lower levels, any any background sounds whether

it's wanted or unwanted are more intrusive at lower levels than for the

general adult population working in our own language. So I hope everyone

remembers that any time we're dealing with someone with hearing loss or other

special needs, we should expect that the noise is having double the effect

that it's having on those of us with normal hearing and with good language skills.

MURPHY: The work that I do in noise and occupational noise exposure research

and hearing conservation, hearing loss prevention with regards to occupational

exposures, we look at things we don't really get too worried until the noise

levels exceed 85 decibels sound pressure level for an eight-hour time-weighted

average. What I do in terms of some of my areas of research, it involves impulse

noise and so we're looking at levels of anything over 140,

upwards of 170. Those are for gun fire noise and the like. I'm at a conference

here today at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and we had a presentation on

the noise produced by a howitzer when it's being fired and the levels for that

can be 180-185 dB. These can make for a very

bad day very quickly for someone's ears and cause permanent hearing loss. It can

definitely cause temporary hearing loss to a person and those are the kinds of

noises that I worry about. Then we also have to worry about

things from what causes sleep disruption and that's what Arlene brought up. You

know the noise levels that it takes to wake me from sleep is very low, you

know, 45, 50, 60 decibels can wake me up. That disrupts your sleep. That can affect

adversely your cardiovascular effects. So that's another aspect of of where noise

comes into play and perhaps the hazardous issues and then there's other

things when you go into the psychology of hearing and how we do, you know our

auditory mp3 personal stereos. Those have noise that's interjected at very low low

levels at the lowest levels to improve the auditory sound of your mp3 player,

your iPod, or your Android device. WANG: Thanks to all of you for sharing

your initial perspectives on it. We as a group, you know when we're planning this

YouTube live event we actually brainstormed about a number of different

kinds of sources that are apparent in everyday life and I did see that there

was a comment from the public that was also asking, like you know, when will

awareness of noise and noise pollution become as common as nowadays how we feel

about smoking and smoking cessation. So I'd like to maybe have you all talk

about some of the sources of noise that you've worked with most commonly or that

you're aware of and maybe say some things about that. So Bennett, would you

like to start answering with that one. BROOKS: Sure, thanks Lily. We, in our work, we do a lot of work in the practical realm

where we build things. I'm an engineer so we build stuff.

And to Peggy's point, over the last decade we've built about 60 or 70 schools and

one of the primary things that is important is the low level of noise in

the classroom and that would be the unwanted

sound from the from the mechanical system, primarily it could be

transportation outside as Arlene mentioned from airplanes or trains or

highways. But we want to keep the level of sound in the classroom very low

below 35 A-weighted decibels or lower, which is the standard ANSI S12.60

People can get a free copy of that from the acoustical society's website, if

you go to the Standards tab and again if you have a very low levels of sound they

will interfere with speech communication which is so important in our schools and

particularly more so as Peggy mentioned for those with any hearing impairment or

English as a Second Language, for example, in our school. This can be something

that we work on and we work on it very diligently so that the schools that we

build can meet the acoustical standards for our kids. WANG: Let me follow up on what

you're saying though, Bennett, what are the sources of noise that might impact

people in classrooms and like what are those sources, rather, you know I want to

try to keep this at this first part talking about growing awareness of types

of noise sources that are impacting communities. BENNETT: Anyone who might go stand in a school for example

might notice that if they have the old style window ventilators, that have a fan

in them and have perhaps an air conditioning compressor in them. That can

be very loud. I measured one, one time that was 70 DBA and the kid was sitting

three feet away from it and I'm trying to figure out how this kid in fourth

grade is engaged at all. I mean it was, that's a problem. So it's

the HVAC, heating ventilating air conditioning systems or we call them

mechanical systems in buildings, which cause a lot of noise and people will

notice that in public spaces also restaurants schools auditoria and then

you have transportation which is a primary source outside.

Planes, trains, automobiles, but also it can get inside the building if the

building envelope is not properly insulated from outside sounds and noise.

I could thank you would you like to add it to any of that yes it's a 40 we're

having a little bit of a hard time hearing you Arlene let's see the train

was intruding on classroom time the train went by every four and a half

minutes and it was over 80 decibels in the classroom the teacher had to stop

teaching so teaching can't go on she lost 11 percent of classroom time and

when we did our study and we compared children exposed to the sound levels of

the trains compared to the children on the white side of the building by the

sixth grade they were nearly a year behind in learning and yes we had to

turn to acoustical improvement to lessen the decibel level the Transit Authority

quieted the tracks adjacent to the school the Board of Ed put in acoustical

ceilings and then when we came back a few years later when it was less noisy

the children on both sides of the building were reading at the same level

so it's not just the learning that I've got intruded upon it was also the

teaching and then I looked at the acoustics within the classroom I agree

in terms of the ventilation as was just stated but even the doors when children

were passing from one classroom to another and one class was still in

session you could still hear the children going back and forth so the

things are getting better the FAA has spent several hundred million dollars to

quiet schools that are exposed to aircraft noise so they're much more

cognizant of it now than we were and please to note that we are talking about

it doing something about it particularly when you the first study

was done 40 years ago so thank you thank you for bein sure Brigitta can you speak

more on other noise sources that are and this sort of soundscapes that you have

studied yeah I like to to mention the road traffic noise this is one thing and

at the same time perhaps the way what noise which which may bother people it's

the same in the same area and the issue is now not only to to measure the sound

level or the noise level but to find something that people give a bit better

life quality in that kind of areas and this is a kind of our research that we

try to find solutions related to places where we do the research for instance so

meaning please let us collect what people think about an area what they

think about the noise in this area and also what they think about which are the

good sounds in this area and how do they want to tell you to manage their daily

life living in this area and so we have done lots of research in

this regard and also when you mentioned soundscape and soundscape let me say

this for the first moment only from this point of you saying the major issue in

soundscape is to lets people participate in changings that are foreseen by this

community or etc even if to do measurements together with people at one

place collecting data are collecting the sound level this is one major important

thing but on the other hand to also to get their impression and perception of

what is happening this is also very important in finding out in a in joint

say communication say having a platform for communication on these topics

absolute to change areas and give some inputs also in urban planning this is

this would be another topic what you should consider concerning that quality

sure bill can you comment about as you know having been technical

chair of the Technical Committee on noise in the acoustical Society of

America I know that we've had many sessions on assorted sources of noise

can you comment more broadly on other sources of noise that we should be aware

of this bill muted he may not be connected right at this moment

sorry there's a recent book that has a very short answer to your question by

Gary Keizer it's called the unwanted sound of everything we want all the

things that we want we want easy transportation we want comfortable

buildings we want all kinds of mechanized things we want we want

entertainment for ourselves we want to carry it along in our phones all these

things can be considered noise they can be harmful to us they can be harmful to

the people around us depending on the context of course so a lot of it is part

of modern society so when you think of any type of thing that is convenient for

you it could be causing noise so the question is how do you use it how do the

people around you react to it and try to

use it in a more friendly or useful way thanks Bennett for that Peggy I'd also

like to ask you for your insights on different sources of noise that you have

either personally experienced or had a lot of research involving that I listen

to lots of clients with hearing loss talk about their noisy environments it's

difficult for communication in vehicles in traffic and it's difficult in in

public places noisy restaurants and all and I think consume

are having some positive effect now on the future of those things restaurants

are getting raided we have this this app that we're all using and mapping out the

noise e places and consumers have been asking for that and they're really

responding positively to that so I think we all have the public has some say in

the fact that we value quiet we value ease of communication and even

though yes I totally agree Bennett we want those things that make me want all

that stuff we want the toys that make noise and we love music and sound we

want to be able to be more in control of it as some have mentioned from the

beginning it's that sense of not not being able to control it there's one

other new area that I've just gotten in and that's that the noise surrounding

sustainable energy and wind turbines and that's a really fascinating and

complicated area because of course we want clean energy and we're trying to

figure out what what we can do about the the sound environment and the sensation

of sound and infrasound around wind turbines so I'm new in that region but

I'm it's a fascinating area that we're studying and I'd be curious to hear if

there are people in the public who have comments about that as well thank you so

much yes I mean please and a grandmother I think you start with children and I

want people to realize that we now have a sound and noise module on the New York

City Department of Environmental Protection's website which teaches

children from the lower grades through high school to appreciate the good

sounds in our world and to be aware of the dangerous sounds and we won't be

able to appreciate the good sounds if the dangerous ones drown them out and I

have written a children's book listen to the raindrops which speaks about

beautiful sounds in our environment then asks everyone to lessen the noise

so that we can one and all forever hear the raindrops fall thank you for that

all right lane so now we want to transition to this topic of why can nose

be bad

For more infomation >> INAD - What is Noise? - Duration: 27:05.

-------------------------------------------

Sofia The First - Sofia is Kidnapped - Best Cartoon For Kids & Children - Chip Studio - Duration: 11:09.

Please LIKE, SHARE, COMMENT And SUBCRIBE Videos! Thank you!

For more infomation >> Sofia The First - Sofia is Kidnapped - Best Cartoon For Kids & Children - Chip Studio - Duration: 11:09.

-------------------------------------------

Jon Hamm Is Definitely Not to Blame for Jeremy Renner's Broken Arms - Duration: 2:47.

So you were here not too long talking

about it with the whole cast.

Tag, it's based on a real thing that happened.

It's a true series of events.

Basically, a real group of real adults with real jobs

take one month out of the year to play tag and try

to tag one another for no money, for seriously just the pride

in not being the last one tagged.

And again, these are adults with jobs

that they leave to go find their friends and tag them.

It's a little bit of a bigger group of guys, the real guys,

who we've met now.

And they're fascinating.

And what it has kind of shown us,

and actually what the movie is-- the larger theme in the movie

is that it's such a great way to maintain friendship with people

who you think are important in your life and also have fun

and stay loose and--

And hurt yourself.

--And really, really hurt yourself with a chair.

There were some injuries, right?

We had several on-set injuries, the most notable being--

I was not there that day.

So it's impossible to blame this on me--

Jeremy Renner, who broke both of his arms

at the same time, day three of production.

We had 40 more days to go with a guy in two--

Now, keep in mind, this is a man who's done 100 Avengers movies

and been fine.

And he does a movie about playing tag, both arms.

[LAUGHTER]

Yeah.

Like firewood, just snapped like a matchstick.

And I got back, because I had to go

to London for the premiere of Baby Driver

and then come right back.

So I was literally in London for like four hours,

and then I flew right back.

And I got back, and I was like, how's it going?

And everyone was like, not great.

What happened?

Well, Renner broke both his arms.

I was like, welp, OK, I guess.

Did you all shut down production for a while?

No, he wore green screen casts that we eventually

painted out in the edit.

Wow.

That's crazy.

Yeah, he is a hard working--

Did you get hurt at all?

Other than my pride when I realized that running

around for longer than 30 seconds

would feel like I was having a heart attack, that was pretty

much the extent of my injuries.

Lucky.

Yeah, lucky, no joke.

I didn't do all my stunts.

I was hit in the face by a foam rubber chair there,

but that didn't hurt that bad.

No, it's foam rubber.

It's foam rubber.

It's fine.

Movie magic, you guys.

Yeah.

Good luck on the rafting trip, because we will be looking out

to see if you're OK.

Keep your eyes to the internet.

And we will be sending our prayers.

And hopefully you're going to be OK.

The movie is called Tag.

It opens in theaters everywhere on June 15.

For more infomation >> Jon Hamm Is Definitely Not to Blame for Jeremy Renner's Broken Arms - Duration: 2:47.

-------------------------------------------

When CBSE Topper Is Your Friend || ft. Bhavesh Saini || PAPU ZHAPU || Episode #13 - Duration: 3:48.

When CBSE Topper Is Your Friend

Episode #13

PAPU ZHAPU

Written & Directed By :- Bhavesh Saini

For more infomation >> When CBSE Topper Is Your Friend || ft. Bhavesh Saini || PAPU ZHAPU || Episode #13 - Duration: 3:48.

-------------------------------------------

Monaco Grand Prix is here to stay – with or without grid girls - Duration: 6:42.

Monaco Grand Prix is here to stay – with or without grid girls Before the weekend a representative from Formula One management had been insistent that the race would not host the return of grid girls.

In January when they were dropped the commercial director, Sean Bratches, said grid girls were "at odds with modern day societal norms" and "not appropriate or relevant to F1". Monaco's "female sponsorship representatives" would not be standing in front of grid slots nor holding boards identifying drivers, therefore they were not, F1 avowed, grid girls. Which on Sunday transpired to be arrant nonsense.

Monaco most definitely had grid girls. Standing in front of grid slots and holding boards with the drivers' names on, albeit ones also displaying a message from a fan and with a 'grid boy' alongside them. They were dressed in revealing, sheer outfits and had the sponsor's logo painted on their shoulder blades. An object lesson in objectification if ever there was one.

F1's lofty ideal to move the sport into the 21st century had been summarily dismissed and its denials of the reality on Sunday were made to look almost laughable.

Six races in there has not been one without incident for Max Verstappen. What is of most concern, though, is that the young Dutchman does not seem to be learning from his mistakes. Most damning, the crash in FP3 that meant he missed qualifying was almost identical to the one he suffered in 2016.

He is young and plenty of other drivers have had their fair share of scrapes while learning their craft but Verstappen is in his fourth season and more is expected of him.

The team principal, Christian Horner, administered his sternest rebuke yet. "He needs to learn from it and stop making these errors. He knows that more than anybody," Horner said. He was joined by Red Bull's motorsport boss Helmut Marko.

"I think he is not patient enough," he said. "He wants always to be who he is, the fastest but the result is only when you cross the line." His recovery drive to ninth was well-handled but the damage had already been done.

Daniel Ricciardo had his redemption in Monaco and, according to Horner, in doing so he most definitely proved he had the right stuff, while across the pond his fellow Australian Will Power secured his first win at the Indy 500 for Penske.

The race in Monte Carlo was no thriller but it was at least tense as Ricciardo had to juggle his MGU-K failure with staying out of the walls, managing his car and not giving any incentive to Sebastian Vettel.

"He could have been in Apollo 13, the way he was dealing with the issues," said Horner, in reference to the 1970 lunar mission that famously encountered trouble. Horner admitted the team had suggested they should retire the car but he wanted to run it until the engine gave out and he proved right to do so.

The 37-year old Power made it a down under double at Indianapolis and the 2014 IndyCar champion admitted he was screaming with joy throughout his final lap as he became the first Aussie to win the prestigious race at the Brickyard.

A procession in Monaco is nothing new but that so many senior drivers were so critical of it is less usual. Many fans have long decried the event and called for it to be dropped, which is highly unlikely.

Regardless of the fact that the race often presents a less than thrilling spectacle, it is still highly valued as the one that attracts attention across the world. Equally the drivers do generally still rate the challenge it presents and it is where the teams do a huge amount of business in sponsorship and hospitality. The principality does not pay to host the race and F1 will not drop it. But it could be changed.

Hamilton has suggested changing the layout, the format and the rules to mandate tyre stops. These would be huge changes across a season but since Monaco is a unique meeting, race-specific adjustments for it seem entirely reasonable.

It would require some bold action but, if the result was racing that actually lived up to the interest the meeting attracts, its position as F1's shop window to a global audience would be truly justified.

Both Hamilton and Mercedes' team principal, Toto Wolff, had warned that Monaco was likely to be a struggle for the team and once there they formally conceded that their car had again been optimised to run on the medium and high-speed circuits.

With Hamilton third on the grid it was the best they expected. "The drivers extracted the pace of the car," Wolff said. "All of us believe that this is the pace of the car around Monaco. You have to be realistic.

We're trying to achieve the best car for 21 races to come out with the most points, and therefore you have to compromise with some of the circuits." Hamilton confirmed this after the race and that the team's long game was similar to last season.

"We know that here and Singapore will be our toughest races but hopefully our car will be better at the majority of races," he said. Which made dropping only three points to Vettel here an absolute boon.

"I am grateful that I only lost three points," he added. "Would l like to have won the Monaco GP? Hell, yes. Would l like to win the world championship? Hell, yes.

For more infomation >> Monaco Grand Prix is here to stay – with or without grid girls - Duration: 6:42.

-------------------------------------------

Lexus IS 300H F SPORT LINE Schuifdak Navi Keyless Go camera F1 A.s. zondag open! - Duration: 1:10.

For more infomation >> Lexus IS 300H F SPORT LINE Schuifdak Navi Keyless Go camera F1 A.s. zondag open! - Duration: 1:10.

-------------------------------------------

Did You Know Why Bottled Water Bad For Health | Plastic is Dangerous to Your Health for many Reasons - Duration: 4:53.

why bottled water bad for health plastic is dangerous to your health for

many reasons BPA a component often found in plastic is a hormone disruptor that

can have a wide range of impacts on the human body including hardman imbalance

toxicity inflammation and even cancer here are 5 top most health problems

which attack by using plastic water bottles one hormone disruption and

fertility harness of the most critical component infertility in both men and

women while anatomical problems can also lead to infertility hormone problems and

other related conditions like endometriosis or most commonly

implicated in impaired fertility plastics are known hormone disruptors

that can send mixed signals causing some reproductive hormones to be

produced excessively and leading to deficiencies in others women and men

both are suspect able to this and in both cases excess estrogens can be the

culprit in reducing ability to conceive to placental and prepubescent

development while endocrine disruptors can significantly alter the ability to

consume many are able to get pregnant and have children in spite of the

presence of these chemical hormones the impact does not end there hvala fertile

development in utero along with the critical early years of a child's life

along with the critical early years of the child's life can be dramatically

altered by the communication from these hormone messengers voices seem to be the

most at risk for severe alternations before entering puberty and while

testicular development itself does not rely on hormones every other aspect of

male puberty and subsequent fertility and reproductive ability does three

cancer cancer impacts to any gender at any age and various organs tissues and

cells but researchers continue to report that the increase in estrogen II

chemicals like BPA and other plastic materials has contributed not only to

breast cancer but also testicular cancer and prostate cancer for toxicity burden

BPA and other plastic toxins have been found in blood and urine widely so

relating throughout the body the toxicity burden that accumulates over

years of exposure can impact all organs and body systems but the liver is the

primary detox organ that filters the blood and the kidneys filter the urine

when you drink a beverage that is housed in a plastic bottle you are also

drinking what the bottle is made of even water can leach particles from the

bottles especially if it has been exposed to heat or stored for a longer

amount of time reusable plastic bottles are subject to the same problems if they

are washed or dried in hot temperatures fiber weight gain and fatty tissue

storage obesity has reached epidemic proportions in recent decades and why

the definition of obesity might seem narrow

greater than 25 percent body fat in men or 30 percent in women the reality is

that many adults weigh more than they should with over 30 percent of adults in

the u.s. categorized as a base even the obesity rate in children and the 19 has

tripled in the last 50 years healthier alternatives to bottled water glass

water bottles glass water bottles tend to be the most inexpensive non plastic

alternative but they are also the easiest to break many companies sell

silicone sleeves for glass bottles that help to prevent breakage and as someone

who has personally used them that he's drop with them they are quite effective

the bonus of glass bottle is that they are easy to clean and certain eyes and

don't retain flavors of beverages the downside is that they tend to be a

little heavier and for that reason or not super child friendly to strangers

steel water bottles stainless steel water bottles are also quite popular

plastic alternatives and in contrast to glass or not breakable they come in

different shapes and sizes on door easily the most trail friendly option

unless your child is prone to throwing their bottles strainer steal bottles are

also better for keeping beverages cool or hot they are typically dishwasher

friendly although painted stainless steel may chip if exposed to repeated

washings in a dishwasher bottles are typically labeled if they

are safe or dishwasher you Strahler steel also does not retain

flavors of beverages like a plastic can thank you for watching this video like

and subscribe for more videos