Thứ Bảy, 19 tháng 5, 2018

Waching daily May 19 2018

POTUS: Obama Surveillance Of 2016 Campaign Is Bigger Than WATERGATE

new developments again tonight on the deep state spying on the Trump campaign

James clapper Barack Obama's former Director of National Intelligence is

actually today saying it was a good thing that the Trump campaign had a spy

for the FBI in their campaign during an election I can't believe it watch it

they may had someone who was talking to them in in the campaign but you know the

focus here and as it was with the intelligent is not on the campaign per

se but what the Russians were doing to try to to instantiate themselves in the

campaign or to influence or leverage it so if there was someone that was

observing that sort of thing well that's a good thing yeah where was the spy in

the Hillary campaign where she did pay for Russian lies clappers so pompous so

arrogant this is so illegal he's actually bragging about surveilling an

opposition party during a presidential election year if that's the case this is

not America we don't have a constitution this is something you'd expect from the

former Soviet Union Venezuela then again you got clappers buddy John Brennan

who's also up to his eyeballs in the scandal probably knows a lot about it

since remember he's the guy that voted for a communist for president last night

we had the great one Mark Levin reacting to all of this his analysis dead spot on

take a look we have a cabal of FBI agents who took it upon themselves to

investigate a candidate and his campaign and then we have of course actual spies

one or more in the Trump campaign what the hell is this the Soviet Union

Venezuela it's the United States of America I want to know what Brennan did

I want to know what clapper did I want to know what Comey did not because I'm

gonna punish them you'll make determinations about this

right something something is terribly wrong we need to fix this we cannot have

an another election where the federal government our United State

government is fair interfering with an election the great ones right we've been

right everyone on this program has have been right we need to fix it because

this is about the Constitution of the United States and it's literally hanging

in the balance at this hour you have unelected deep state actors

shredding our Fourth Amendment rights your right to privacy protection against

unreasonable search and seizure this is as I've been telling you one of the

darkest chapters in American history the Trump campaign is targeted but there's

people like clapper Brennan Comey and others they think that they knew better

than you did the American people about who should be the president they've

weaponized the powerful tools of intelligence turned it on us and they

are now politicizing differences political differences by the way clapper

since you're so concerned about Russian influence in the election did you have a

spy in the Clinton campaign now we know for a fact her campaign was colluding

had a foreign agent Christopher Steele paying for Russian lies and propaganda

to lie to the American people and Clinton in the DNC remember they paid

over what 12 million dollars for the Russian dossier full of Russian lies

where's the FBI where's the CIA were the spies of course there weren't any

instead of investigating it well they used former spy Christopher Steele who

they fired as a trusted source and they used falls completely unverified never

corroborated a dossier he put together to get a warrant and then spy on the

Trump campaign never tell the judges she paid for it and in the process lying to

FISA Court judges on four separate occasions never revealing Hillary paid

for all this this is the biggest abuse of power corruption scandal we have seen

in the history of this country talk about Watergate this is Watergate

on steroids and human growth hormone mortar gate what a third-rate break-in

that eventually forced the President to resign you may remember this

what is playing out right now is nothing compared to Watergate spying on an

opposition party during an election it makes Watergate look like stealing a

candy bar from a candy store now here's why now the details of this abuse of

power are so far worse the New York Times now confirming this week

everything we have been telling you The Times didn't all of a sudden decide

oh we want to tell people the truth this is about actively now assisting the deep

state and what the Times is doing is they're helping these bad actors get in

front of this scandal because they know it's all coming out so they're twisting

and spinning the facts and crafting their own narrative now to steal a page

from the FBI's playbook well they now know crossfire hurricane is coming now

here's why the deep state is about to be exposed it's all happening now a portion

of the DOJ IG report is set to come out now in a couple of weeks Congress well

they'll eventually get the documents that led up to the IG report we'll see

it all the DOJ is now slowly leaking this information to friendly news

outlets like The Washington Post in new york times here's the thing what they're

now reporting is now corroborating everything we have been uncovering let's

run through the details starting with this quote the FBI obtained phone

records other documents using National Security Letters a secret type of

subpoena officials said and at least one government informant ie spy met several

times with mr. Page and mr. Papadopoulos and current and former officials say

that confirms the FBI had a spy and informant that infiltrated the Trump

campaign where's the warrant and in addition to lying to the four FISA

judges four times to get the FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign the

FBI is using secret spies was there another secret subpoena now it sounds

like the deep state was using every single option available to go after the

Trump campaign and by the way after they of course rigged the Hillary

investigation here's another significant quote that matches our reporting days

after they closed their esta Gatien into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email

server agents began scrutinizing the campaign of her Republican rival now The

Times adds that both these investigations were made up of a small

group of the same top officials so the same officials that rigged the Clinton

email investigation even though we know she broke laws and obstructed justice

while then they went after Donald Trump and set their sights on him now next now

is this shocking part that directly implicates here John Kerry and Barack

Obama nobody's picked up on this top o Australian officials broke with

diplomatic protocol allowed the Ambassador Alexander Downer to sit for

an FBI interview to describe his meeting with campaign adviser George papadopolis

all right diplomatic protocol broken that means John Kerry from the get-go

this is the beginning the Obama State Department and I'm sure the president

that means Obama all involved that means they knew about the spying from the

start and as we have been saying for months John Kerry Barack Obama need to

answer two simple questions what did you both know and when did you both know it

now these are there are other disturbing details in this now these deep state

sources revealed to the New York Times that for Trump campaign associates were

being investigated by the FBI wasn't just Carter Page and George papadopolis

whoever he is the FBI was also going after General

Michael Flynn and Paul Manafort from the get-go this was a major intelligence

operation and finally these unnamed sources also tried to spin that Peter

struck Lisa page text messages you know what they were talking about who we now

think is Andrew McCabe about their so-called insurance policy in case the

unthinkable happened and Donald Trump won they're actually claiming now quote

they said that anything the FBI did publicly would only give fodder to mr.

Trump's campaigns and claims that the election was rigged

mr. struck countered that even if mr. Trump's chances of victory were low like

dying before you're 40 the stakes are too high to justify inaction

well that's laughable and it proves our point the deeps

these top players not rank-and-file desperately trying to spend all of this

damning all of this incriminating evidence now another new breaking story

to tell you about tonight anonymous government sources have been repeatedly

leaking to the media details about the FBI informant who did spy on the Trump

campaign and at the same time they're accusing the president Republicans even

people like me of putting this informants life in danger

I've known the guys name for the full week here's the latest example from the

Washington Post bigger than Watergate Trump joins push by allies to expose the

role of an FBI source they are falsely smearing not only the president and

congressional Republicans and yours truly no we're trying to conduct an

investigation Congress is they have constitutional oversight authority

they're supposed to do this in the process Washington Post as biased as

they are is revealing key details about who the person is for example quote the

source is a US citizen and it's provided information over the years to both the

FBI and the CIA as the post previously reported and aided the Russia

investigation both before and after Muller's appointment in May of 2017

according to people familiar with his activities okay on the face of this it's

ridiculous and for the record the person's name has been out there in the

media I've known it for over a week and by the way it's not some closely held

state secret what is withholding now or unfolding before our eyes is utter

insanity and the total hypocrisy on display for the cold country to see you

got the DOJ FBI are accusing the president Republicans people like me of

endangering a source at the same time anonymous law enforcement intelligence

they're the ones leaking the details about who the informant is that is what

we call a deliberative smear now here's point number two this is really

important these unnamed federal officials have leaked more information

to the New York Times of Washington Post then they've given to Congress because

they're trying to get a friendly audience and remember

Rosenstein has been slow walking obstructing stonewalling every

congressional attempt to do their constitutional authority of oversight

every chance he gets and when Rosenstein does actually comply while he turned

over what heavily redacted information in the claims of national security but

we've seen that's just a lie it's not true

look at these leaks about the FBI informant you know what would they

really be doing all this if it was a national security threat this is about

getting out in front of Congress in front of the IG in front of what they

know is coming they're trying to control the narrative slowly bleed it out has

nothing to do with national security just like Rosenstein weird acting the

fact that James Comey didn't think that general Flynn lied to the FBI neither

did anyone else in the FBI that had nothing to do with national security

that was a cya and Rosenstein protecting his corrupt friends he and Jeff Sessions

they either need to go or do their job action our top story Fox News

contributor Sarah Carter Judicial Watch president tom Fitton

and author attorney David Limbaugh full disclosure david has negotiated every

single radio and TV contract and book contract in my career and I usually pay

for dinner look Sarah this has been a huge week here what James clapper said

okay is basically we don't have a country we're not about the rule of law

there's no constitutional protections anymore in this country pretty much what

he's saying is and remember clapper is being investigated for leaking by

Congress so they believe James clapper was the one that actually delivered the

information to CNN after the president was briefed on the dossier by Comey at

Trump Tower so clapper has a lot to answer for

but basically what clapper is saying is like look we weaponized the intelligence

community to spy on a campaign because we were concerned about the Russians but

Sean what about the $500,000 that Bill Clinton got in 2000

ten for a speech he gave to Renaissance capital which by the way is very well

connected to the KGB FSB Russian FSB by this Bank

did they have spies with with Bill Clinton at the time were people

investigating the Clintons and the Clinton Foundation during that time I

don't think so this is a very well orchestrated it

appears planned to spy on a presidential campaign and it was very well partisan

it involved Brennan it involved clapper it involved foreign assets it involved

US assets and I think we are only seeing the top of this iceberg I'd like to see

this unravel and I have a lot of questions about what was going on in

England at the time in the United Kingdom well you have a lot of reporting

that I know is coming as you've been telling me look David let's look at this

from the legal side this is a politically targeted you did we didn't

have spies in the Hillary campaign we didn't have FISA warrants based on a

trump dossier against Hillary lies to FISA warrant weaponizing the powerful

tools of intelligence lies in applying to FISA Court judges to target a one

political candidate in favor one political candidate who did commit

crimes who ditched paper Russian propaganda it is the biggest most

twisted boomerang I've ever seen in my life yes Shawn and and if what clapper

says is true that it was an innocuous investigation to find out what

involvement Russia had then why would they have bent over backwards as Andy

McCarthy says to avoid investigating Hillary and indicted her and bend over

forward to indict and implicate and and inject residences for the why would they

have deceived why yes why would they have deceived the FISA Court if it was

an innocent investigation and why would it have presented flimsy evidence that

paid for by by a Clinton sponsored group and and funneled through the law firm if

it was necessary if it wasn't was an innocent investigation why can't

they just present real evidence instead they deceived them as to the source as

to the fact that steel had been fired by the FBI and as to the fact that Sid

Blumenthal and others had provided information and it was a circular

bootstrapping a warrant application based on a report that that seal have

given to a news agency it was also incestuous and also corrupt

and why would Kohli have lied it's such a good point and go ahead and Tom you

can't have a dual system of justice or you know the hillary standard and the

rest of us standard and then for the DOJ to slow-walk obstruct lie about national

security as a reason for redactions and clappers comments blow me away

that means the rule of law does not exist in America what they did here that

means they think they have unfettered power to do anything they want if they

don't like a candidate well that's true and going back to the investigation

itself you were they were going all out against President Trump or than

candidate Trump with this spy operation and recall from the last IG report which

confirmed that the Obama Justice Department at the same time was telling

the FBI to stand down on any investigation into the Clinton

Foundation which we now know that the FBI and DOJ knew full well was the

recipient of monies from Russia in order to influence the positive outcome on the

uranium one investigation and just quickly let's get to the heart of this

this is the Moller operation this was a counterintelligence investigation that

began in 2016 that is being continued right now by mr. Muller

let's give a preview of what's coming next week

Sarah Carter what's coming next week oh yeah well I think we're gonna have a lot

more information on the inspector general's report we're going to have

more direction on that and also have a lot of stories coming on what was

happening in London at the time all right guys thanks great analysis we

appreciate it thank you god bless you and God bless america

For more infomation >> POTUS: Obama Surveillance Of 2016 Campaign Is Bigger Than WATERGATE(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 17:52.

-------------------------------------------

Who is Sheku Kanneh-Mason? Royal Wedding cellist from Britain's Got Talent - Duration: 3:20.

Who is Sheku Kanneh-Mason? Royal Wedding cellist from Britain's Got Talent

Sheku Kanneh-Mason is a British cellist who won the BBC Young Musician of the Year award in 2016. PRINCE Harry and Meghan Markles wedding featured a series of magnificent musical performances.

Heres what you need to know about cellist Sheku Kanneh-Mason, who gave three poignant pieces as the newlyweds signed the register. Who is Sheku Kanneh-Mason?.

Sheku Kanneh-Mason, 19, is a British cellist who won the BBC Young Musician of the Year in 2016. He was the first black musician to win since the awards launch 38 years earlier.

Sheku grew up in Nottingham and began playing the cello when he was just six. Prior to this, he had briefly played the violin.

He is the third of seven children and, in 2015, the siblings were all competitors on Britains Got Talent - where they performed as The Kanneh-Masons.

What did Sheku Kanneh-Mason play at the Royal Wedding?Sheku said he was excited and honoured when Meghan rang him up to ask if he would perform ahead of the wedding.

He wrote on Twitter: I was bowled over when Ms Markle called me to ask if I would play during the ceremony, and of course I immediately said yes!!! What a privilege. During the signing of the register, the talented cellist played:.

Sicilienne Maria Theresia von Paradis (1759-1824) arr. Chris Hazell (b.1948)Apres un reve Gabriel Faure (1845-1924) arr. Chris HazellAve Maria Franz Schubert (1797-1828) arr.

When did Sheku Kanneh-Mason perform at the Baftas?He performed at the 2017 British Academy Film Awards, at Londons Royal Albert Hall.

Already in 2018, Sheku has broken a UK chart record - scoring the biggest-selling British debut of the year to date with his classical album, Inspiration.

The cellist became the first musician to perform at the Baftas twice as he took to he stage on February 18, 2018. He was joined on stage by his equally talented siblings.

For more infomation >> Who is Sheku Kanneh-Mason? Royal Wedding cellist from Britain's Got Talent - Duration: 3:20.

-------------------------------------------

The 'Saturday Night Live' Season 44 Cast Is Sure To Be A Standout - Duration: 14:30.

The 'Saturday Night Live' Season 44 Cast Is Sure To Be A Standout

Believe it or not, its that time again.

Season 43 of Saturday Night Live is coming to an end, and its been one hell of a ride.

The increasingly outrageous political climate that first gave life to Alec Baldwins Donald Trump impersonation in Season 42 led to the creation of characters for his cohort — Cecily Strong as Melania Trump, Kate McKinnon as Jeff Sessions, the list goes on — and they have starred in the bulk of this seasons politically-charged sketches that are sure to go down in the shows history.

With such a legendary season on the books, fans can only wonder, who will remain in the cast of SNL Season 44?.

From seasoned veterans to comedic newbies, the show is known to feature a variety of them all.

After the abrupt departures of Vanessa Bayer, Sasheer Zamata, and Bobby Moynihan last season, casting brought on three new featured players, Heidi Gardner, Luke Null, and Chris Redd.

The three have a mixed bag of experiences — Gardner made the cross-country move from L.A. to join the cast, Null was born and raised in Cincinnati but did improv performances in Chicago, and Redd is a known and experienced actor and comedian.

NBC has yet to release an official lineup for the season to come, and its hard to make a 100 percent accurate forecast based on past casting decisions because so many different variables play a part, and there are often some big surprises.

Nonetheless, fans of the show have already begun to conspire and make predictions about what to expect in Season 44 based on the current cast, so lets start there.

Colin Jost & Michael Che

This pair of Weekend Update anchors seem to be going strong, and needless to say, there definitely isnt a lack of current events for them to cover and razz on week after week.

It would be silly for them not to continue the hilarious dynamic they have built throughout Season 43.

Beck Bennett

The SNL enthusiasts of Reddit have spoken, and they seem to agree that although his roles were a bit more subdued than usual toward the end of this season, Bennett isnt going anywhere.

Aidy Bryant

Bryant is finishing her sixth season as a member of the SNL cast, and she continues to master the characters she is given with hilarity.

Although the show would probably do good to keep her on, her career elsewhere is flourishing (read: her featured roles in recent films The Big Sick and I Feel Pretty) so its possible that she could be ready to move on.

Pete Davidson

After spending part of Season 42 in rehab for his addiction and mental health issues, Davidson was welcomed back to the SNL set with open arms.

Heres hoping his recovery has only made him stronger.

Leslie Jones

People speculated that Jones wouldnt return to Season 43 in anticipation of her breakout movie career via her starring role in the Ghostbusters reboot, but she still came back.

It seems as though Jones will be sticking around at SNL, whether thats on set, in the writers room, or both.

Kate McKinnon

I dont know about you, but after Season 43, I cant picture Saturday nights without seeing McKinnon playing Jeff Sessions.

Shes definitely a staple cast member right now, and I dont think SNL is ready to let her go.

Kyle Mooney

Although hes only been a part of the SNL family for five years, his movie career is taking off after the release of his film Brigsby Bear last year.

It may just be time for him to move on.

Cecily Strong

Strong has been an incredible female lead since joining the cast of SNL in 2012.

Now that she portrays FLOTUS Melania, she needs to stick around for at least the next three years.

Kenan Thompson

Its no secret that Thompson has made history in his role on SNL.

After breaking the record for longest standing cast member with a 15-season tenure, it may finally be time for him to pass down his comedic staff.

Mikey Day

Day is still relatively new to the SNL stage, and has succeeded in his satirical portrayal of both Donald Trump Jr. and Secretary of State Paul Ryan.

He could very well find himself in the seat of a repertory player next season.

Heidi Gardner

New to SNL on Season 43, Gardner has not failed to impress audiences with performances driven by her stark humor.

I can definitely see her rising to the top as more veteran women of the show begin moving on to next steps in their careers.

Alex Moffat

Redditors also seem to agree that Moffat had a knockout Season 43, and many are sure hes bound to be promoted to the repertory cast.

Luke Null

Null seemed to achieve the opposite of standing out this season, lacking memorable roles and sketches, which could mean that producers dont trust him with them.

He could be on the chopping block at this seasons end.

Chris Redd

Redd came into SNL as a successful comedian already, and it shows.

Now that he has a strong first season under his belt, theres no telling how much more of a factor hell be he will become in future episodes.

Melissa Villaseñor

As of right now, writers havent given her much opportunity to show audiences what shes got.

Hopefully its not too late and Villaseñor is given another chance to shine on Season 44.

Of course, whether or not Saturday Night Live welcomes any fresh faces depends on if they decide to cut anyone or if anyone ultimately parts ways with the show.

Only time will tell everyones fate, but regardless, fans can still look forward to more laughter-filled Saturday nights come this fall.

For more infomation >> The 'Saturday Night Live' Season 44 Cast Is Sure To Be A Standout - Duration: 14:30.

-------------------------------------------

Sarah Sanders on Hannity : Trump is way out of Jim Acosta's league - Duration: 7:25.

I fake news CNN's credibility continues to be called into question today during

an interview on the liberal network president Trump's attorney Rudy Giuliani

called out the entire network for their blatant bias what's this does the

president never get here any benefit of the doubt was Eucharist ever Rudy or on

this network which is disgusting actually I would tell you something I

think he gets the benefit of the doubt much more often you know they know your

credit for you know that most people think that I'm crazy to come on here

unfair to the president do you think this interview has been unfair yeah I do

you think this interview has been unfair absolutely why because I don't think it

given me a chance to explain how injustice in this case is I don't think

you've given me a chance to explain the basis of it with the FBI report that was

faulty the FBI report that came to the conclusion can be prosecuted when you

come to a conclusion do anything wrong I mean how can you investigate a man who

will you come to include anything wrong you guys never never you didn't play up

that part of the report that Rudy Giuliani's right fake no CNN basically

never gives this president a fair shake they never will there not even honest

about it now for example earlier this week CNN Trump hater official Trump

hater supposedly a reporter supposedly objective Jim Acosta he goes on Jimmy

Kimmel Live and he said he was just as tough on Obama as he is on President

Trump it's not a joke take a look are you their least favorite of all

probably yeah you know as FDR once said I welcome their hatred I do and you know

listen when I covered Barack Obama I was just as tough on him people might not

believe you weren't dating like you either they don't like me adversely

disliked I am so how acosta can actually say that with

a straight face is beyond me because the tapes don't lie and our friends at the

Media Research Center they found this gem of Jim Acosta

covering President Obama's inauguration in 2013 the only thing missing from the

so-called reporter are the pom-poms take a look and obviously this is this is the

moment that everybody is waiting for on inauguration day when the president

would first ladies step out of their mo and walk down Pennsylvania Avenue

you know I feel I feel like I should pitch myself right now wolf I can't

believe I have this this vantage point of history in the making but you're

literally what about 15 20 feet away for the president I'm probably a good I

would say 50 feet away from the president right now

yeah with Obama needs to pinch himself and he says he's a reporter says he's a

journalist no he's a liberal activist be honest about it now earlier I spoke with

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders about this and so much more all

right Sarah thank you for joining us you know you look at all of what I'm

pointing out here I don't think there's ever been a more hostile news media in

the country then there's been the president Trump I think it's obvious

it's it's it's so bad that there is 91% negative coverage according to the media

Research Center it's unreal the amount of negative coverage that comes from the

media covering this White House not just because it's so one-sided but because

there's so many good things that they could be talking about the economy's

booming Isis is on the run remaking of the judiciary getting rid of the

individual mandate the foreign policy and the relationships that this

president has built every single day there's a good news story to tell and

yet 90% of the coverage is negative Sean one of the clips that I hope that you'll

go back and watch that I think Jim Acosta also said from that interview was

that he'd love to go one-on-one with President Trump I just a little note to

Jim I think he should stick with going one-on-one with me because President

Trump is way out of his League and I don't think he wants to take on that

challenge because he's definitely not going to win I I think that the media

bias is out of control and he's certainly one of the leaders of the pack

look if he wants to be an opinion person I'm a talk show host and as a talk show

sometimes I do straight news interviews sometimes I give opinion

other times I moderate debates sometimes I debate it's all encompassing but I am

I tell everybody I'm a conservative we still do a lot of we break frankly we

break more stories than most of them in a in a week than they do in a year in my

opinion and they've been wrong so often what why why does this continue in this

sense every day I watch you I don't know how you do your job

I couldn't is not enough money on this earth to pay me to do what you do and

it's actually gotten personal and abusive and

I have we gotten to the point where maybe they should submit their questions

in writing hand back written answers because while they're really trying to

do is get a moment so they can show their audiences how tough they are and

it's really just a It's Showtime for them it's not about getting answers look

I do my job because I love this country and I love getting to come to work every

day and work for President Trump who also loves this country and wants to do

good things you can block out the critics and focus on the people across

the country that love the president love what he's doing and we try to spend our

energy focused on those comments and the people and the voices coming from

outside of DC and outside of New York and outside of the Talking Heads because

those are the people that really matter and those are certainly overwhelmingly

supporting President Trump and what he's done and that makes it pretty easy to

come to work every day you know look at this week the president was answering

answering a question about the violent violent gang known as ms-13 it was

obvious the media ran with it and then they ended up almost all of them having

to retract it there's a lot of retracting that they really need to do

though it's it's incredible and a lot of times you see the media just

automatically assume the worst out of this president which is really sad

because again I think they're missing out on some of the most amazing things

that are happening he's had an incredible first year and a half and

they're missing it because they're so focused on being negative and attacking

not just the president but everyone around him and I think that's a real

disservice to the country he clearly was talking about ms-13 when he referenced

the animals and I said it yesterday I'll say it again I think he could have gone

even further these are some of the most despicable people that have ever walked

this planet the things that they do the type of activity they engage in animal

is the nicest thing I think that the president could have called them and I

hope he'll continue to call them out and continue to put pressure on every law

enforcement agency and official in this country to bring them down and protect

people across all all over the country and certainly I think he's done a great

job doing that all right sir great job I don't know how

you do it every day amazing and we appreciate you being with us

you

For more infomation >> Sarah Sanders on Hannity : Trump is way out of Jim Acosta's league - Duration: 7:25.

-------------------------------------------

It's Official – AG Jeff Sessions in California Presser Divulges He is a Part of the Deep State - Duration: 10:36.

It's Official – AG Jeff Sessions in California Presser Divulges He

is a Part of the Deep State

On Monday the US Attorney General Jeff Sessions held a press conference at the San Diego border.

During the presser Sessions replied to a question surreptitiously admitting he is part of the

Deep State.

This is why Congress wants him held in contempt.

This weekend US House representative Devin Nunes dropped a bomb on FOX News as reported

by Sara Carter –

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes revealed Sunday that Congress will hold

Department of Justice Attorney General Jeff Sessions in contempt for refusing to turn

over classified information the committee has requested, he stated in a phone interview

with Fox and Friends.

The Department of Justice also shot back on Sunday, releasing the letter sent to Nunes

on May 3, which addressed the classified information Nunes had requested.

It appears from the letter Nunes had asked for information on a specific individual,

not yet named and considered by DOJ to be a very valuable person for a counterintelligence

operation.

A day later on Monday, sleepy and corrupt AG Sessions held a press conference at the

US border.

During a question and answer period Sessions responded to a query about Congressman's

Devin Nunez's statements on Sunday.

Sessions responded –

The Department of Justice has written him a letter and to responded appropriate to him.

Ah.

The request he's made is one that the intelligence communities and the Department of Justice

feels is not grant-able.

We explained that we liked, that we'd be willing to talk to him about it before the

details about which I've written to him can be discussed.

As Sean Hannity later states in the above video, if thesed guys don't do their job

and stop the redacting and start providing documents requested by Congress, it is time

for Sessions and Rosenstein to be held in contempt.

It is now time and it has been time for many months.

Sessions' FBI and DOJ redact documents to cover for their crimes and corruption.

They created the phony and unconstitutional investigation into President Trump and the

non-existent collusion with Russia.

This is not a crime and after many months of investigation, there is no proof of this

non-existent crime even occurring.

Based on Sessions actions to date and his now more outward stance above, it is clear

he is part of the Deep State.

Sessions must be held in contempt.

Sessions must go.

For more infomation >> It's Official – AG Jeff Sessions in California Presser Divulges He is a Part of the Deep State - Duration: 10:36.

-------------------------------------------

Princess Charlotte Is Just Adorable at the Royal Wedding - Duration: 3:30.

Princess Charlotte Is Just Adorable at the Royal Wedding

One of the youngest royals made a huge impact at Saturdays wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

Three-year-old Princess Charlotte, who first captured hearts with her sweet wave when she was seen heading in to meet her newest sibling, Prince Louis, last month, again showcased her adorable wave a couple of times at the now Duke and Duchess of Sussexs ceremony.

Along with Charlotte, nine other children, including 6-year-old brother Prince George, served as bridesmaids and page boys at the nuptials.

Charlotte first served up her cute wave when she arrived with her mother, Kate Middleton.

Following the ceremony at St. Georges Chapel at Windsor Castle, Charlotte continued to win over the crowd with yet another friendly hand gesture.

Prince George, meanwhile, was seen hiding behind the legs of his and Charlottes father, Prince William.

The royal wedding seemed to go off without a hitch.

The 36-year-old bride stunned in a Givenchy dress, Queen Mary tiara and Cartier jewelry.

Harry, 36, wore the frockcoat uniform of the Blues and Royals.

The bride was escorted down the aisle by Prince Charles.

The ceremony was followed by the couples first kiss and a carriage ride to greet their well-wishers.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét