Presenter: The next question is the most popular one, you might say. Everyone is interested in another presidential candidate.
I will read [questions] from two users of our site.
In particular, Fyakhar Alexsov writes: "Recently I began to notice on the Internet, and now also on television,
that Pavel Grudinin is being promoted more and more into big politics.
Now there is even information that he has been elected already as the presidential candidate from the Communist Party instead of Zyuganov,
although he is not the party member.
A cloudy character. It seems to me that he is getting to be more prepared for the elections of 2024,
as a candidate for allegedly patriotic forces, and in fact for the next coup in Russia".
And Marat Gimadiev also asks: "His promoting is going on, (meaning Grudinin's),
there are videos with information about the "Lenin State Farm", which he manages.
The cost of building a children's park, for example, is 250 million [rubles], a kindergarten - 540 million [rubles], a school - 2 billion rubles.
It's hard to believe that an ordinary state farm can have such revenue, which makes it possible to implement such projects,
because besides this there are still salaries, taxes, maintenance costs, and so on.
And how Zyuganov supports him. This is very suspicious.
Intuitively you feel some kind of dirty trick. In fact, there are no worthy candidates now, except Putin. Or am I wrong?"
Valeriy Pyakin: Absolutely right. And here we must understand the deep essence of the nomination of Grudinin.
You must not use intuition, it is necessary to approach with knowledge of the matter and understand what the point is:
where Grudinin came from, why this is happening.
And how it became possible that in all cities and towns of our vast country,
in one way or another, people engaged in agriculture faced very big problems.
And, naturally, people [have the question]: how come [Grudinin] is engaged in agriculture and suddenly he is so successful, and he is the only one?
But here it is necessary to understand several things: "Lenin State Farm" is not a regular state farm.
It works for Moscow, and Moscow is a very capacious market.
But the market is a market, and production must be a production.
But the "Lenin State Farm" has a very serious advantage - [it can] lease its land for the construction of shopping centers at the entrance to Moscow.
Shopping centers do not occupy a lot of space, but bring good profits.
It is possible to terminate the contract with some [tenants] and not terminate such agreements with others,
but conditions can be changed to make more profit.
But there is still a small aspect to this: how does it turn out
that some state farms [and] all the agriculture in the country cannot effectively exist, and the "Lenin State Farm" is very effective?
And the nomination of Grudinin is a specific indicator of the relationship between the global predictor and Putin.
Many people have fallen into such a fallacy:
when I constantly was saying that the global predictor, because of necessity, is forced to support Putin,
then [some might think that] everything Putin does is in the interests of the global predictor, and Global predictor unconditionally supports [Putin].
Actually, it's not like that.
The global predictor supports Putin exactly in the volume in which Putin's activities meet the interests of the Global predictor.
But this does not mean that the global predictor
supports all of Putin's activities and would not want to compensate it.
We have always said that the Global predictor always uses the moment to push a knife into the back or
put a spoke in the wheel in order to slow down the development of the country and gain its full sovereignty.
So, Grudinin's nomination is the realization of a deep-seated, long-term global project
to change the direction of Russia's development away from gaining its full sovereignty and growing its power.
[For example] there is a simple thing:
in one way or another, all entrepreneurs associated with agriculture, are faced with one simple [situation]
when the bandits came to the entrepreneur.
In regards to the "Lenin State Farm", there is fragmentary information about how the bandits were trying to muscle the "Lenin's State Farm".
And [that information shows] that it always resulted either in no one hearing about these bandits anymore, or they got other problems,
which had to be solved, and [there was no time] to harass the "Lenin's State Farm".
Luzhkov
respectfully kept himself aloof. If there was any conflict with the "State Farm", he apologized and stepped aside.
Sobyanin had a conflict with Grudinin about two years ago, [but he] also apologized and stepped aside.
But what forces stand behind this ordinary entrepreneur, the chairman of the state farm, if such people [give way to him]?
Besides Luzhkov is indeed a project of Global predictor, and a very serious project.
And here the American lackeys basically outplayed the globalists with Luzhkov's resignation,
when Medvedev, while in in China, sacked Luzhkov under the influence of the American lackeys to solve this problem.
[Grudini] is a profound project.
And this project shows: "Capitalism, allegedly, can also have a human face, if it is socialism, if it is properly managed."
And we have already seen something [alike] with the chairman of the collective farm – and it is Belorussia.
There also was kind of a successful chairman of the collective farm is there too, who became a successful president.
After all, nobody cares that the economic success of Belorussia, the success of its social programs depends solely on subsidies from the Russian budget.
It was always like this - in the 90s and 2000s [years], Belorussia was supported at the expense of Russia.
But the hurray-patriotic propaganda prefers not to notice it.
It's possible to create one more,
so to speak,
agitation point, but presented not by a separate state [Belorussia], which should consolidate
all the post-Soviet republics in a united country, as planned,
what Lukashenko was assigned for.
But Lukashenko thought or thinks that he was assigned to be the "emperor" of All Russia, and [because of it] he is raising the heir to the throne - Kolya.
In fact, he had to only consolidate [post-Soviet countries], because Belorussia is an agitation point.
When, after the shooting, Perestroika and bloody economic reforms, people want the bright past again,
then Belorussia presents [them] a Marxist project [and] consolidates [all of them together].
But Lukashenko is powerless,
and not everyone seems fine with him.
Here you are, the director of the Lenin State Farm.
Although [now] it is simply an ordinary enterprise, a closed joint-stock company.
He was able to cope; he also demonstrates the effectiveness.
Let's elect him the president of the united state.
In principle, Lukashenko with all [his] ambitions, had to pull chestnuts out of the fire for a completely different person.
And the fact, that Grudinin was nominated now, shows that globalists do not like it at all,
do not accept the very idea that Russia would gain sovereignty and economic development.
It is fundamentally important now for them to change the leadership to any, absolutely any person, just to stop Putin.
Putin suits them as a person who is solving global problems. They are fine with [Putin] only in this regard.
But what happens?
They planned the Customs Union as creation of center for the concentration of Turkic-speaking peoples [in] Kazakhstan - the "format of Astana."
Putin took the Customs Union and made [it] an integration project for the entire post-Soviet space with a center of concentration of government in Moscow, Russia.
He turned the tables and outplayed them.
They planned the "Silk Road" program for China,
[but] the last [events], especially the participation [of the countries at the APEC summit in Danang], show that Putin actually outplayed it as well.
Russia is becoming an even larger center of concentration of government, without which it is impossible to cope.
For example, what about the call of the King of Saudi Arabia, who survived [after the shellfire]?
And where does the King of Saudi Arabia have to go, if the rocket fell on his palace?
Where should he go? Whom should he appeal to?
To China and Iran, which actually gave this rocket to the Houthis?
Or to the United States, which let down Saudi Arabia everywhere,
and whose Patriot defense systems cannot intercept the old missiles that the Houthis are armed with? No.
[Saudi Arabia] has only one opportunity to preserve its cultural identity, to preserve its statehood, (let it not be the state, but at least statehood),
to remain in the future - if globalization takes place the Russian way.
Hence the interest of the royal family of Saudi Arabia towards Russia.
They are looking for a defender of their cultural identity, and development in this regard.
Saudi Arabia does not like what the development under the auspices of the British crown has led to;
at least by the fact that the result of this development is the complete elimination of the kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
They do not want to die; they want to live [somehow] differently.
Therefore, naturally, Russia becomes the center of concentration of government.
And you cannot get away from it; all rolled into it.
But if Russia becomes the center of concentration of government on a different, alternative conceptual basis, [different from] conducted by globalists,
then globalists cannot do anything. They need to stop Russia.
Therefore, they've got to remove or maximally incapacitate the person
who manages the restoration of Russia's sovereignty and economic and political power.
In this regard, the plans of global leaders and the country's "elite" of the United States to delegitimize the presidential elections coincide.
Globalists need not remove Putin completely now, but need to delegitimize him as much as possible.
So that Putin in order to maintain peace and order in Russia, to prevent a civil war in Russia,
which is planned by (the US) country elite for the summer of 2018, was more compliant and submissive.
So that he would surrender Russia's interests in gaining sovereignty so that Russia does not have a civil war, so that Russia continues its way to development.
Putin must have the least legitimacy, so that it could be demonstrated [to him]: "You have the worst rating;
you need to negotiate with the clan-corporate groupings."
Therefore, they need to introduce [for the elections] a very serious figure, the figure that will be put after Putin,
and they need to show: "He is a voting for the future. He is the future leader of the country.
Yes, he will not win this elections, but he will win the next. And that's why [now] we need to vote for him as much as possible, because Putin will win anyway so far".
This is a treacherous logic.
This is a wrong logic.
The more votes Grudinin takes, the lower will be legitimacy of Putin's management,
the stronger will be the dictate of clan-corporate groupings inside the country and the pressure from outside, the less Putin will be able to do for gaining sovereignty.
And look how all the "patriotic" movements suddenly rushed:
"I used to think that I would vote for Putin, and now [there is] Grudinin. [To vote for him] is to vote for the future".
For what future?
For what future are you going to vote?
Grudinin is directed as a spoiler
for maximum de-legitimization of Putin's management, so that Putin does not succeed in making Russia a centre of governance concentration.
In order to give control over the Customs Union to Astana, to return control over the "Silk Road" back to China.
[They] need to stop Putin now.
In fact, how how do they put it?
"Look, [Grudinin] coped with the collective farm". [He] did cope with the collective farm, [especially] in such hothouse conditions, when everything is provided for him.
Investors come themselves, never ask anything; put no pressure, not making him surrender his interests.
They just get their profit and stand aside.
And he has very wide "Moscow" opportunities.
Shopping centers alone can bring a lot of money, let alone very, very serious Moscow market.
But the most important thing is, what do they say?
"Look, [Grudinin] is fine. And Putin is [not]". Putin has something weighing him down.
Putin cannot fully deal with all the clan-corporate groupings that make Russia dependent on foreign centers of supranational governance.
Gorbachev's Perestroika and Yeltsin's reforms were being prepared since 1953, when the "right" personnel were placed everywhere.
And we have patriots living in a world of simple solutions, when they have a president, and he is like Santa Claus, who can replace anyone at any moment.
Putin tried to deal with the "elites" more drastically – so he has got a catastrophe at the Sayano-Shushenskaya hydropower plant.
Putin cares about people.
[He] is forced to maneuver and to negotiate with clan-corporate groupings.
But he is constantly worsening the conditions for them, and as the result they are put into prisons in mass,
the fight with corruption has been started.
But the patriots didn't get enough; they just want everything right away.
And everything does not happen at once.
And the global predictor understands: the more Putin succeeds [to do] in his next term, the harder it will be to win [everything] back.
Yes, they plan to put Grudinin [as the president] in 2024.
But with what tasks?
How much will it be necessary to surrender Russian sovereignty, so that a global plan for the world order, conceived by the global predictor, takes place?
[This] depends on how much Putin can do in his last term.
And so that he could do less, they released Grudinin.
Not only to test him. If they succeed, they will make Grudinin president.
Ok, legitimacy will be minimal, but it's already something.
The main thing is that Putin has solved very many problems now:
stabilized the situation in the world in terms of terrorism, and in the Middle East, Central Asia, and Europe.
Generally speaking time for ISIS is over.
This does not mean that it is all over with ISIS at all. But in Iraq ISIS simply disappeared, and the staged a "victory parade". Well done!
And why should it not dissolve, if, I repeat, ISIS is an irregular army of the United States.
Today they wear a beard and some kind of incomprehensible camouflage,
and tomorrow they will have shaved off their beards and wear the United States army soldier uniform.
Where have 44,000 of US's military personnel got lost?
Grudinin's task is to tear Putin's electorate away from Putin as much as possible.
Ordinary people support Putin.
They see that Putin restores Russia's sovereignty, restores its economic and political power, that he makes life easier for ordinary people.
And people vote for him. This is not a pure Communist Party club.
Pure Communist Party club voted for Kharitonov, for Zyuganov, and this is no more than 20% at most.
And the task [of Grudinin] – to tear more;
to make Putin depend on oligarchic clan-corporate structures.
That's the task of Grudinin.
So that Putin could not bring Russia to full sovereignty.
And then Grudinin will come and work as [global predictor] needs.
And Russian guys will die in all parts of the world for the interests of supra-state administration.
Not for the interests of Russia, as it was in Syria,
but for the interests of supra-state administration.
Therefore, they released Grudinin.
It is necessary to understand a simple thing:
to vote for Grudinin is to vote against Russia, against gaining its sovereignty.
Because it is fully correlated with the plans of the global predictor and (the US) country elite.
Now, by releasing Grudinin, the globalists expect to pass between Scylla and Charybdis:
to maximally delegitimize Putin and to prevent civil war
that the US country "elite" plans to unleash in Russia, which also conducts supranational governance over Russia.
Therefore, Putin will be reproached for everything: he is to blame for this; he is to blame for that. He says wrong to the Central Bank.
He says wrong here and there. Putin will be diligently led to a conflict
in which Putin will definitely lose. If Putin loses - Russia loses!
Putin has already been weighed down.
Putin is accused of having, for example, Siluanov [as being appointed a Minister of Finance], forgetting that Ulyukayev was arrested for corruption.
And Siluanov's position, as recent events show, also is being in question. He can find himself next to his friend.
Not yet. But whether Siluanov will be there or not, depends on how powerful support for Grudinin will be.
If there is a strong support for Grudinin - Siluanov has more chances to remain at liberty,
[as well as] all corrupt officials and clan-oligarchic structures for governing Russia.
Grudinin is a brake on gaining the sovereignty of Russia. This must be understood.
This is an external project, it is a global project, and he was specially grown to distort the very movement of Russia to gain sovereignty.
And make no mistake here.
I often [heard] [from] the Communist Party club such conversations:
"We must unite with Americans, overthrow Putin, and then [engage] in a clash with Americans." You ask them a question:
- Do you expect any success in the clash with Americans?
- No, what are you talking about! It's such a power! They are simply ripping Russia off.
- Putin does not meet the interests of Americans? - No. He doesn't.
- Maybe it's better to support Putin so that he can solve the problem in confrontation with the Americans, and then you would have won?"
- No. Putin is more evil than American external governance. [Let us] be under American rule, but Putin must be removed.
This is the basic ideology of the entire Communist Party club in its purest form.
Whoever I speak with – whether they are party functionaries or simple followers of the Communist Party.
For them, Putin, who is leading Russia to gain sovereignty, is more evil than the Americans carrying out supranational governance.
And now they nominate a candidate Grudinin, who is supposedly a successful entrepreneur, who stands for socialist ideology,
and who actually hits now where it hurts. He actually hits now where it hurts.
Putin cannot, and indeed no one can deal with these clan-corporate groupings overnight.
I repeat, in order to plunge the country into perestroika, shooting and reforms of Gorbachev and Yeltsin, it took 25 years.
And they demand it from Putin, who alone fights against all these clan-oligarchic structures, to change all this overnight. They say:
"And he's been running the country for 20 years!" But has he been at the head of the country for 20 years?
I constantly say: there is no one Putin can rely on. There is simply no one to rely on! He constantly has to maneuver.
In this respect, he is largely similar to Stalin.
Stalin passed away in 1953. And already in 1956 Stalin's comrades-in-arms held the 20th congress and began de-Stalinization.
Putin is in worse conditions, in much worse conditions!
And when someone blames [Putin] that he has [governed the country for] 20 years and has not been able to do anything,
[then] that person is either a fool or a traitor. I cannot use another word here.
We need to understand [the situation]! There is history.
Look at what happened in the past. It is necessary to study management, to not speak such nonsense.
It is necessary to see how everything is linked! I repeat,
Putin wanted to deal with clan-oligarchic structures more resolutely. Clan-oligarchic structures showed:
"This is you who is interested in the people of Russia.
This is just you, who cares about Russia. For us - nothing [terrible] happens, if Russia would be ruins and the people would die out".
And they made a catastrophe at the Sayano-Shushenskaya HPP.
Seven times was given the command from Moscow to launch a turbine, and seven times it was stopped. [It was] a damaged turbine put out for repair!
The fact that it would break, it was clear. The command was given from Moscow seven times, to start and stop the turbine, to start and stop, until it disrupted.
Is this an accident? Of course not. This is purposeful wrecking.
Putin just got the opportunity to punish the perpetrators of such crimes,
[and then] all joined together to ensure that Putin wouldn't be elected, and if he would, then with minimal legitimization. With the minimum!
Therefore, there are so many people who want to participate in the elections.
[They want] to take percent here, half-percent there, and some hundredths of percent there.
The more Putin's votes are taken, the more Putin will be illegitimate.
And most importantly, they instill a provocative and hostile thought:
"Putin will win anyway. Therefore, we must vote for the future, we vote for Grudinin. We must say "no" to Putin, we vote for Sobchak".
The main thing is to rip off [a part of Putin's electorate from him]. Anyone who follows this logic is like a mule following a carrot on a stick.
It is necessary to understand clearly: all the other candidates [except] Putin, the entire coalition of candidates are aimed at ensuring that Putin,
if he passes the first round [of presidential elections], that he has the minimal legitimacy of his power. That he has minimum capacities
in terms of gaining sovereignty of Russia. For that Putin was forced to continue to negotiate with clan-corporate groupings.
And Grudinin is the greatest danger here. This must be understood.
Grudinin is aimed at taking Putin's electorate away from Putin, with the help of unfounded demagogic statements.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét