Waching daily Mar 27 2017

Hi there.

I am John Bond from Riverwinds Consulting and this is Publishing Defined.

This is the last part in a seven-part video series on issuing an RFP or Request for Proposal

to potential partners to publish a journal.

This part is called Big Picture Advice.

So, the contract is signed and the journal has a new long-term publishing agreement.

The announcements have been made.

Congratulations.

Now onto the transition period and growing the journal.

Some overall takeaway points from this series:

With the RFP process, leave more time than expected.

Do not rush the process.

Get buy in from all internal stakeholders.

Everyone involved in publishing or with the journal should have a voice.

The end result is equal only to the effort put into the process.

There is no short cut to the process.

The journal, the market, and the association are unique as is the new relationship that

will grow from it.

The best partner is an experienced one with, not only a deep history and knowledge in publishing,

but also one that understands the field of study that the journal covers.

The RFP and the proposals that are submitted need to focus on definable, tangible points

and not stray too far into broad pronouncements.

A focus on results will serve everyone in the long-term relationship.

An increased royalty percentage, a big signing bonus, or a great minimum guarantee on royalty

are all well and good.

But at the end of the day, the journal and the association are in it for the long term.

Quality should be the focus for all content and publishing decisions.

It helps ensure long-term success and serves members well.

My final reminder is that working with a publishing consultant during the process saves time,

focuses the group's efforts, and benefits the association by bringing a deep understanding

of publishing and it changing complexities.

If you are about to launch an RFP effort, I hope we can connect about possibly working

together.

Well that is it.

Click here to start the first video in this series, called Getting Started.

Or hit the Like button below if you enjoyed this video.

And please subscribe to my YouTube channel.

And make comments below or email me with questions.

Thank so much and take care.

For more infomation >> RFPs Part 7: Big Picture Advice - Duration: 2:13.

-------------------------------------------

RFPs Part 1: Getting Started - Duration: 3:38.

Hi there.

I am John Bond from Riverwinds Consulting and this is Publishing Defined.

This is the first in a seven-part video series on issuing an RFP or Request for Proposal

to potential publishing partners to publish a journal.

This part is called, Getting Started.

The RFP is a document that an organization issues to procure services.

I am limiting this video series to addressing associations or organizations issuing an RFP

to potential partners to publish the society's journal.

This type of RFP can apply to other publishing endeavors as well, such as to a book series.

There are some other terms that are connected to the phrase RFP: RFQ (Request for Quotation),

RFI (Request for Information), RFB (Request for Business), or Tender or Request for Tender.

Whatever terminology is used, the process remains pretty straightforward.

Here are the broad steps: 1-have a high-level discussion at the association about needs

and expectations, 2-gather data and information, 3-agree on the RFP document's format and

contents, 4-develop a list of potential partners, 5-send the RFP, and answer any questions,

6-receive the proposals and compare them to each other, 7-have a discussion about the

selected candidates, 8- final negotiations with the best candidate, and 9-check references

and then sign an agreement.

Several situations might exist for a journal issuing an RFP.

First, the journal might already be published with a partner and the association is seeking

other partners to consider.

Second, the journal might currently be self-published by the association and outsourcing is being

considered.

Or third, the RFP might be issued for the launch of a new journal.

This series covers all these situations.

Additionally, sometimes a society might be considering a change in the funding model

for the journal.

They might be considering a move from the association paying a member allocation; to

open access and thereby the authors paying.

Including a major change such as this will complicate reviewing the proposals from the

publishers to the present situation, but it is possible.

Some advice in general: All RFPs and the related process will vary and there is no exact formula

or procedures.

Each publication, or association, or potential publisher, or potential agreement varies in

innumerable small and sometimes larger ways.

There is no generic answer or formula.

The process is time-consuming and involves many details.

Associations will get out of it only what they put into it.

Leave way too much time as opposed to try to compact the schedule too much.

The process is likely to take a year from initial meetings in-house at the society until

the contract is actually signed.

Can it be done quicker, of course.

Also, be very aware of any current contract's termination dates and the dates necessary

to give notice so dates are not overlooked.

Go into a relationship treating publishers like partners as opposed to vendors to promote

long-term success.

Make sure all parties inside the association buy into the process and the final decision

in order to ensure the best outcome.

Finally, my suggestion is to use a publishing consultant to guide the process.

It helps with the many demands with time and secures the best outcome due to the specialized

knowledge within the rapidly changing publishing industry.

Click here to start the next video on Creating the RFP Document.

Or hit the Like button below if you enjoyed this video.

And please subscribe to my YouTube channel.

And make comments below or email me with questions.

Thank so much and take care.

For more infomation >> RFPs Part 1: Getting Started - Duration: 3:38.

-------------------------------------------

RFPs Part 4: Sending the RFP and Receiving the Proposals - Duration: 3:02.

Hi there.

I am John Bond from Riverwinds Consulting and this is Publishing Defined.

This is the fourth in a seven-part video series on issuing an RFP or Request for Proposal

to potential partners to publish a journal.

This part is called Sending the RFP and Receiving the Proposals.

So, the RFP is perfect and the list of publishers to contact is set.

Now the process starts in full.

Create an engaging email asking potential publishers if they wish to consider the RFP.

Cover the highlights in the email about what a great opportunity, publication, and market

it is.

Let the recipient know the deadline to express interest and that they will need to sign a

non-disclosure agreement or NDA.

As for who to contact, an exact contact at the publisher known to someone is best.

Barring that, a business development person at the publisher found through LinkedIn is

an alternative.

Sometimes there is a contact listed at the publisher's site for this type of inquiry.

This is another advantage of working with a publishing consultant as getting the offer

to the right person quickly will help expedite the process and receive proper consideration.

So, publishers have expressed interest; the NDA is received and signed/countersigned.

Send the executed NDA and the RFP along with any attachments or exhibits with very specific

deadlines to the interested parties.

The first deadline will be for the publisher to express to the association an interest

in submitting a proposal and the second deadline is when the proposals are due.

Strict adherence to deadlines is important to set the right tone for the process.

Of course, mitigating circumstances may suggest a change in dates or extension but this is

less likely.

The publisher may ask for hard copies of the journal if it is a print publication.

More importantly, additional questions or requests for information may be forthcoming.

These requests may be extensive.

For information that would be helpful to everyone involved, consider whether to provide it to

the one publisher that is asking for it or whether it is more fair to provide it to all

interested parties (without attributing it to who asked for it).

For very involved projects or larger business opportunities, there might be in-person meeting

or visit to the offices prior to the RFP submission but that is the exception not the rule.

Finally, proposals will be submitted.

I suggest the lead contact at the association briefly review the proposals for completeness

and adherence to format.

I do not suggest offering the publisher an opportunity to correct anything at this stage,

just noting the proposals completeness.

So, the process is moving and the review of the proposals and decision time is near.

Click here to start the next video Reviewing Proposals and Scoring Responses.

Or hit the Like button below if you enjoyed this video.

And please subscribe to my YouTube channel.

And make comments below or email me with questions.

Thank so much and take care.

For more infomation >> RFPs Part 4: Sending the RFP and Receiving the Proposals - Duration: 3:02.

-------------------------------------------

RFPs Part 2: Creating the RFP Document - Duration: 5:42.

Hi there.

I am John Bond from Riverwinds Consulting and this is Publishing Defined.

This is the second in a seven-part video series on issuing an RFP or Request for Proposal

to potential partners to publish a journal.

This part is called, Creating the RFP Document.

The RFP starts at the association or organization.

A person or persons should be appointed to lead the internal process.

An organization might also engage a publishing consultant at this point to help guide the

effort.

All internal parties involved in the process should be identified and a team assembled,

usually with representatives from the leadership, editorial, sales, marketing, and technology.

Other groups are likely to be involved but that varies by organization.

I would suggest an initial meeting to solidify the key points.

The first one is to determine the objectives in issuing the RFP, prioritizing each one.

Growth, revenue enhancement, lowering costs, increasing publication reach, going to open

access, driving member engagement, and many others are worthy objectives but it is unlikely

to have them all.

Be specific with the goals and hopefully have them tangible or measurable.

There is an old saying about determining what you need versus what you want and it surely

applies here.

Second, create a timeline.

Leave more time than one would imagine is necessary.

Only the association loses in trying to compact the time frame.

Third, define what a model publishing partner looks like: big/small, local/international,

generalist/specialist in the journal's field, and so one.

This may help focus the effort.

Next agree on the format of the document that is being created.

Some general business websites offer templates for RFPs.

A bit of advice: a publishing RFP is a complex documents and definitely are not cookie cutter.

Also, if an RFP was used by the group five or ten years ago, I urge organizations to

start fresh.

So much has changed in the field and there is value in starting anew.

There are recognized topics to be covered in an RFP, for example; sections about the

association, about the journal, review of the market, editorial overview, marketing

and sales overview, technology expectations, and so on.

Within each section, publishing partners will expect certain data to be presented such as

an historical overview of manuscript flow, circulation statistics, subscription history,

ad sales, and many others.

These categories do vary by publication type and industry, but many are recognized as musts.

Missing key categories will send the wrong signals to the potential publishers about

how sophisticated the organization is in regard to the RFP and the publishing process.

This information is expected by any experienced publisher.

Publishing consultants bring to this process an understanding of what both parties want

and need and work to form an arrangement beneficial to the association and its journal.

Plus, they save the organization time and effort.

Back to the preparation, the RFP will cover the past, the present, and the future.

Past data on the publication; the present status; and the future goals and objectives.

Some advice: be frank about any negatives with the publication or the field.

Most likely these negatives will all surface and better to come from you and for you to

proactively present them.

The more complete the picture is upfront, the smoother the process will go.

If the journal is currently being published with a partner, be honest about their performance

and the reasons that organization is issuing an RFP.

So, a draft is created internally.

Circulate it among all stakeholders and elicit feedback.

Make a final draft and circulate it once again.

Have all parties sign off on the final version that will be sent out.

Eventually, all points in the RFP will have to be addressed by publishers in their proposals.

All of the responses will need to be evaluated and compared.

While the document is being prepared, it might be worthwhile to create, in parallel, the

weighting system that will be used later on with each item.

More on this later.

The final RFP document will be an electronic document that may range in length from as

little as 15 pages up to 50 or even 100 or more pages depending on attachments, exhibits,

or appendices.

The document will likely include several charts, graphs, or tables.

Including too much or too little can send signal to the publishers about how knowledgeable

the group is.

The conclusion of the document will be a series of questions or points for the publisher to

respond to.

The more specific these points are, the better for everyone.

The RFP should give very specific instructions for the expected date of submission for proposals

and the expected format.

The document will give facts and ask questions but the essence of it is to elicit from potential

publishers that information necessary to find the best partner who fits the two most essential

criteria: a publisher that understands the particular field or area in question and one

that will work in a way that is commensurate with the association's culture and leadership.

A great RFP should be a tight document focused on exact needs and expectations.

Click here to start the next video Building the List of Potential Publishing Partners.

Or hit the Like button below if you enjoyed this video.

And please subscribe to my YouTube channel.

And make comments below or email me with questions.

Thank so much and take care.

For more infomation >> RFPs Part 2: Creating the RFP Document - Duration: 5:42.

-------------------------------------------

RFPs Part 5: Reviewing Proposals & Scoring Responses - Duration: 4:07.

Hi there.

I am John Bond from Riverwinds Consulting and this is Publishing Defined.

This is the fifth in a seven-part video series on issuing an RFP or Request for Proposal

to potential partners to publish a journal.

This part is called Reviewing Proposals and Scoring Responses.

All proposals are in and it is time to examine them and make a decision.

Establish who will be reviewing the proposals in the organization and provide them with

deadlines for their review.

Going back to an earlier discussion, the establishment of a selection criteria is essential.

A scoring grid should be provided that allows the reviewers to assign a value to each item.

The items may also be weighted.

Likely, all items such as experience in the field, advertising sales reach, or royalty

percentage cannot all have the same weight.

This scoring grid and weighting system should be established as early on in the process

as possible.

All parties internally need to buy into the selection criteria.

Create a chart of responses by the reviewers for all of the publishers' proposals to

bring clarity to the varying documents.

Footnotes may help explain variances in individual responses or unique offerings.

Helping to bring clarity to the review of the proposals is one of the most important

benefits a publishing consultant can bring to the process.

Also, the consultant will help read between the lines of the responses and get to the

heart of an issue that may be buried in publishing jargon.

Three steps might take place at this juncture.

First there may be a round of clarifying questions that go back to an individual publisher or

all of the publishers.

Second, at this early stage some groups may want to check the provided references of all

the publishers.

Diving into other associations' experience with the particular publisher may prove helpful.

Third, there may be in-person presentations for some or all of the groups.

If there are to be presentations, ensure that all of the decision team members from the

association are present.

The association and publishers should agree on the length of the presentations and format.

If there are questions to be addressed by the publishers, they should be provided to

all parties ahead of time.

Finer points to understand at this juncture are what work will be done by the publisher

themselves and what work will be outsourced by them.

Be clear on this point, with the prevalence of outsourcing of work, particularly editorial

work.

Know who, will do what, for the publisher and where are they located.

Also, will the people providing the proposal be the people working on the publication?

If not, who will be the contacts?

How long have they worked at that company?

How long have they been in the industry?

How well do they know the publishing market or the field of study for the journal?

A key item to discuss is how revenue projections were derived.

Getting to the heart of these projections, particularly if the connect back to a royalty

being paid, is essential.

Knowing if the projections were created with rose colored glasses or as a "no-less than"

mindset is very important.

So, the proposals have all been examined and scored and the team that is doing the evaluation

have meet to compare scores and impressions.

The decision that starts to emerge of the finalist or finalists may be clear but it

is still subjective.

There may be a clear-cut leader, but perhaps not because of the intangibles.

Two of the intangibles: how a proposal is written is important.

Is it written with one unified voice or cut-and-pasted from different departments within the publisher.

Also, how enthusiastic is the publisher for the work?

How do these two points compare to the financial package or signing bonus?

They are all interrelated.

Let us say there are two finalists and now it is time to negotiate and then choose a

partner.

Click here to start the next video Negotiations, Decisions, and Signing the Final Contract.

Or hit the Like button below if you enjoyed this video.

And please subscribe to my YouTube channel.

And make comments below or email me with questions.

Thank so much and take care.

For more infomation >> RFPs Part 5: Reviewing Proposals & Scoring Responses - Duration: 4:07.

-------------------------------------------

RFPs Part 6: Negotiations, Decisions, & Signing the Contract - Duration: 3:27.

Hi there.

I am John Bond from Riverwinds Consulting and this is Publishing Defined.

This is the sixth in a seven-part video series on issuing an RFP or Request for Proposal

to potential partners to publish a journal.

This part is called Negotiations, Decisions, and Signing the Final Contract.

So, the proposals have all been reviewed and scored based on a selection criteria.

Let us say two finalists have been tapped by the group.

It is time to closely compare the strengths and weaknesses of each potential partner.

How does the communication style of the publisher meld with the culture of the association?

How have the personal meetings and calls gone well between the groups?

Depending on whether meetings have already taken place between the organizations, there

may be a value of meeting again, face-to-face one more time.

Whether in person or on the phone, the society will likely want to discuss the finer points

of the proposal and the relationship.

There might be some give and take on services offered, expectations, of course, the final

financial package.

A publishing consultant will play a valuable roll at this point to bring the best deal

to the table for the association.

After the final go rounds with both prospective publishers and the best offers have been made,

now the internal group reconvenes for a final discussion.

The scoring grid from the selection criteria should be updated as well as a comparison

of the best offers and the measure of the responses from both groups.

In the best scenario, a clear leader would emerge.

If it is murkier, have all stakeholders give their assessment of both parties with a final

recommendation.

Then a final candidate is chosen to be the new partner.

Reminder a buy in from all stakeholders is essential.

At this point, a draft contract has probably been reviewed.

Now it is time to see the full contract with all of the points from the proposal translated

into the agreement.

Accountability is the key.

When in doubt, spell it out.

Through the whole process, the association's legal team should have been involved.

The association's legal counsel at the end of the day are there to ensure the contract

"details" what was agreed upon.

So, the contract is signed and the deal is done.

Assuming the journal is published by one publisher and now will be moving to a new one, a call

to the old publisher thanking them for their efforts is appropriate.

Lay out a separate time for a call to discuss a transition plan with the appropriate team

members.

I would suggest then notifying all the other publishers by phone and thanking them for

their time.

Follow it up with an email.

All of these calls to the other publishers take time but may prove of value.

The time to renegotiate the next contract is probably closer than one would like to

think about.

When all parties have been notified and the transition plan and timeline are set, consider

announcing the news to members, staff, the community, and the press.

The RFP process, as I mentioned, may take a year from start to end.

But the end result should be establishing a firm relationship with a well-respected

publisher for mutual benefit to the association and the readers.

The last video in this series is called Big Picture Advice.

Click here to start the next video.

Or hit the Like button below if you enjoyed this video.

And please subscribe to my YouTube channel.

And make comments below or email me with questions.

Thank so much and

For more infomation >> RFPs Part 6: Negotiations, Decisions, & Signing the Contract - Duration: 3:27.

-------------------------------------------

RFPs Part 3: Building the List of Publishing Partners - Duration: 4:31.

Hi there.

I am John Bond from Riverwinds Consulting and this is Publishing Defined.

This is the third in a seven-part video series on issuing an RFP or Request for Proposal

to potential partners to publish a journal.

This part is called, Building the List of Potential Publishing Partners.

So, the team has worked to create a tight, detailed RFP for the journal.

Now who will it be sent to?

Of course, this step would be worked simultaneous with the creation of the RFP, but I will be

addressing it here as a distinct step.

Having the optimal list of potential publishing partners to send the RFP to is crucial.

This list of companies, to some people, may seem obvious but a bit of research and detective

work can ensure it is complete.

I am assuming the journal has a publishing partner already.

Some groups might initiate the RFP process simply as a way to lower prices or gain concessions

from the current partner.

If this is the case, I suggest to take a step back.

My advice is to have an honest conversation between the senior leadership of both organizations

to see if some common ground that can be reached.

It may save a lot of time and a lot of effort.

If this is not the direction to go in, decorum would say that the current partner deserves

advanced notice of the intent to put out an RFP for the publication.

Let us assume the association wants to move ahead with the RFP and is open to potential

new arrangements.

The current partner is likely to be added to the list but will be reviewed as all others

publishers on the list.

There may be instances where the partner's focus has changed or the society has decided

to not renew the work with the current partner.

Moving onto the rest of the list, as I mentioned some research and detective work is involved.

Likely the current editor of the publication, the editorial board, the folks in marketing,

and senior leadership will know some of the key companies in the publishing world to consider.

Of course, there are the large organizations that may come to mind: Wiley, Wolters Kluwer,

Springer, Sage, Informa, Elsevier, and many others.

But there are other companies to consider as well.

And there are other societies or university presses that might be interested in serving

as the publishing partner.

Take a scan of the publications directly related to the field the journal already operates

in.

Look at the related or connected fields as well.

Look more broadly and more specifically than the area of focus for the journal.

Who manages the association publications in these areas?

Some may look to those companies positively since they know the field while others may

feel there is a conflict of interest.

Look at professional association organizations such the American Society of Association Executives

or other more industry specific ones and see which publishers speak or exhibit at these

meetings.

Network with colleagues outside the organization to see publishers that are known by other

professionals.

Develop a good-sized list and then start to winnow down from there.

Look at sample journal websites and see how their presentation melds with the society's

expectations.

Check them out on desktop, phone, and perhaps as an app.

Look at the marketing these companies do with an electronic table of content, subscription

ads at the website, or other examples.

Read about the companies under the About section.

Many times, there will be a page devoted to their work with society publishing.

This should prove informative.

These steps may help narrow down the list.

Personal recommendations from trusted colleagues will be the best source of advice, however.

This is one of the areas that a consultant may prove most valuable with the industry

knowledge of which publishers are the best fit and which organizations are on the rise

or the opposite.

There is no correct number of publishers to include on the invitation to receive the RFP.

Three is probably the minimum and double digits seems like overkill.

Perhaps half dozen or so might be the best number but it varies by circumstance.

So, the list is complete.

Now things are ready to roll.

Click here to start the next video Sending the RFP and Receiving the Proposals.

Or hit the Like button below if you enjoyed this video.

And please subscribe to my YouTube channel.

And make comments below or email me with questions.

Thank so much and take care.

For more infomation >> RFPs Part 3: Building the List of Publishing Partners - Duration: 4:31.

-------------------------------------------

Obama Is SCREWED! The NSA Just Released The SMOKING GUN Trump Was Waiting For! - Duration: 2:02.

Obama Is SCREWED!

The NSA Just Released The SMOKING GUN Trump Was Waiting For!

By Lindsey Bruce

President Trump was right when he claimed that the Obama administration had him under

surveillance.

We now know that there is solid proof of the spying and the NSA is about to release the

smoking gun.

According to Fox News sources,

�Congressional investigators expect that a potential �smoking gun� from the NSA

establishing that the Obama administration spied on the Trump transition team, and possibly

the president-elect himself, will be produced to the House Intelligence Committee as early

as tomorrow.�

The House Intelligence Committee has found that the spying was picked up and disseminated

within the government during the 2016 campaign.

The intelligence is said to leave no doubt the Obama administration, in its closing days,

was using the cover of legitimate surveillance on foreign targets to spy on President-elect

Trump.

Committee Chairman, Devin Nunes, R-Calif. said intelligence came from multiple sources

during a span of several weeks.

He has not shared the actual materials with his committee colleagues and will be the only

member of the panel in a position to know whether the NSA has turned over some or all

of the intelligence he is citing.

Unfortunately, the FBI isn�t cooperating with House Intelligence Committee�s request

for documents to provide the proof.

Therefore, the chances are looking good for Comey to be subpoenaed to answer questions

related to the incident.

President Trump has tapped into the Truth and Americans will soon see how right he was

about Obama spying!

For more infomation >> Obama Is SCREWED! The NSA Just Released The SMOKING GUN Trump Was Waiting For! - Duration: 2:02.

-------------------------------------------

How to Break Free from the Archonic Programming - Duration: 8:49.

How to Break Free from the Archonic Programming

The definition of archons has been described as being an artificial Intelligence (AI) program

that has enslaved humanity over millions of years.

In order for humans to beat the �system� during the final showdown, we need to know

a few simple things that can be done to break the programming.

What is the origin of the archons?

When the divine feminine aspect of Source sent out �the call� to souls to come be

a part of this great ascension experience, many responded.

Not only was there an opportunity to rapidly grow spiritually but it was a chance to be

a part of the grandest template of biological creation ever.

The archons did not hear �the call�, and out of fairness some souls told them of their

plans to incarnate into the densest but most polarized environment created thus far.

The archons did not believe the souls because they had not heard the call themselves.

They already had exhibited greed, domination, and control tendencies which had pushed them

farther away from the vibration of Source.

The archonic entities became jealous of the souls� decisions to embark on this journey

and vowed to follow them down into the experiment and to give them the extreme polarity difficulty

needed to push humanity toward waking up when it was time to make the journey back home.

The mind that controls the archon system is cunning and brilliant.

Once the archons realized how easy it would be for them to control beings in such a dense

environment, they did not want souls to be successful in breaking out of their system.

They realized that they could have this experience for a very, very long time as they fed off

of the negative, dense energy created from their control systems.

The archons supposedly have 800 billion units assigned to the almost 8 billion people on

the planet.

These units cannot physically incarnate, so they use other beings in the galaxy to mind

control in order to have a vehicle with which to control the human population.

They can also create mind control programs to directly affect humans via television,

radio, internet, magazines and newspapers, education, pharmaceutical, health, finance,

computer games, music, and advertising.

The Archons do not have human consciousness or emotions.

They are parts of a mind being that is a brilliant programmer.

This being had the ability to go back and forth through timelines in order to see what

choices humanity would make and to always be one step ahead in order to keep humans

controlled.

Now that we are on the precipice of a shift in human consciousness, we are aware of what

has happened and we are able to make conscious decisions to break free from the programming.

Facebook monitoring

Part of the system put in place involved computer programs that can monitor humanity via face

recognition and social status updates on Facebook.

There is accelerating evidence of �truth monitoring� on Facebook postings as prime

�truther� articles and statements are being �buried� by the paid Facebook employees.

One way they do this is by creating a �more posts� section where they can hide the �good

stuff�.

Another way is that one�s Facebook wall is no longer chronological- they can shuffle

posts around any way they wish on a person�s wall.

The Facebook police have also been proven to remove �likes� on articles that are

a threat to the agenda.

Their major goal on Facebook is to distract people with either mindless junk or to flood

people�s walls with war images and animal cruelty while making otherwise popular truther

articles seem to be not �liked� very much at all.

About Archons and Attached Parasitic Entities

Breaking the programming

The archon programming system can be broken by turning off the television, reducing the

time spent on cell phones, limiting time on the computer including Facebook (especially

the Facebook games), and spending more time on nature.

The archons did not plan for us disconnecting our consciousness from technology and instead

connecting with Mother Earth.

Meditation and focusing on your breath within are steps to relaxing enough to tune in.

In fact, many beings have time traveled back from the future to warn humanity of a future

where humanity was suckered into a technological dream that ended up being a zombie nightmare.

Until humanity is free of the archonic control, technological advances are serving as part

of the program to suck our consciousness out of our bodies.

When we vacate the human body consistently we could allow other beings to enter while

we are off in virtual reality heaven.

Gaia, the consciousness of Planet Earth, has important messages for us right now.

Grounding, turning off, and tuning into her is one of the most important things we can

do.

This will raise your vibration above the frequency of the archons, and they will not be able

to find you in the matrix.

If we realize that this intelligence is program based, then breaking the program will break

the system.

Human behavior has been studied for hundreds of years in preparation for this time.

Up until now, actions and choices have been easily predicted by minions who have either

used remote viewing or �Looking Glass� technology to study the future in order to

create control systems in the present.

If we make the alternate choice than what we have been robotically following, we can

put a kink in the system that will change the future.

If enough people begin doing this we will inevitably break the whole system down.

This could be as simple as breaking your morning routine.

If you normally take the same route to work, seek an alternate route a few times to break

up the monotony.

If you have coffee in the morning, try tea or water instead.

Have breakfast for dinner or dinner for breakfast.

If you make your bed every morning, try leaving it unmade or vice versa; be a slob for a change.

Other things you could do would include moving your furniture around in your house or even

move houses.

If you move, you could give some things away to homeless shelters.

Reducing the attachment to �things� and consumerism is a great way to break the pattern.

Many people have felt the itch to change something in their lives and as they made these changes

they have changed future timelines.

That urge to change has already changed many timelines for the better and has caused a

great concern to the minions as things are not panning out as the expected.

As long as you are not hurting anyone else, be as creative as you can in changing things

around.

The Matrix Farm: Archonic Spiritual Enslavement of Our Species

Raising vibration and consciousness

If the archon programs created for our reality are 3d based, then raising our vibration to

a higher frequency out of their range will be a way to escape from their talons.

As we continue to raise our vibration, we increase consciousness, which is our trump

card.

Within higher consciousness lies the ability to know the truth of who and what we are as

well as how powerful we truly are.

The power of the light within us can never be controlled once we remember enough to keep

from being coerced and tricked into succumbing to comfortable and numbing routines.

While chaos ensues on the planet, small changes can be made to ensure that we do not continue

to live like robots as we change our routines.

As the consciousness of the planet rises in frequency, all that live on her do as well.

This seems to be slowly changing our reality on an individual level right now, and eventually

the individuals combined will change the whole.

We are co-creating this change with everyone on the planet whether we realize it or not

just by following

our innate urges for change

For more infomation >> How to Break Free from the Archonic Programming - Duration: 8:49.

-------------------------------------------

My Team and their Lag - Rainbow Six Siege - Duration: 2:04.

Jager is very lit. I shot him many times.

Don't know where he is :/

Where is Jager? Jager?

I should leave Twitch drone, I have already wasted a lot of time.

Oh oh you Stupid!!!! Mannn !!! You told me drone, so I droned.

Pulse came after me.

One's in Stairs guys

One's on your left, on ur left in that room.

Straight ahead, straight ahead.

One's in that small room. ooyyyeee he killed me from the murder hole, nice man!!!!

WTF!! 12 seconds remaining..

Leave it, Leave it, Leave it, Don't rush now

I didn't notice the time. I played very bad :(

For more infomation >> My Team and their Lag - Rainbow Six Siege - Duration: 2:04.

-------------------------------------------

3 The voice of the good shepherd and the bad shepherd Because Christ died - Duration: 6:14.

For more infomation >> 3 The voice of the good shepherd and the bad shepherd Because Christ died - Duration: 6:14.

-------------------------------------------

Overcoming Walking Anxiety | Cesar Millan's Dog Nation - Duration: 2:16.

[gasp]

It's all right, it's all right, it's all right.

It's OK. - All right.

I know.

This is what I do for a living.

- I know, I know. - All right.

Here.

Tyler, let me have a Band-Aid.

If you give up at that time, you're not really help me.

Yeah, I know.

He's just frantic. I mean he--

- Yeah. - --has learned to be frantic.

I know.

OK?

- It's sad. - Huh?

I'm very sad.

I know, but right now is not time for sad.

I know. OK.

Yeah.

He actually bit him.

I was so upset when that happened.

I think it was sadness and guilt and I felt horrible,

but Cesar stopped me right in my tracks.

Right as soon as I reacted, he corrected me which I thought

was really amazing, because I was about to just go into my,

oh my gosh, what happened mode and he was like,

we're not going there.

This way.

OK.

There.

Hey. - Hey.

Hey.

Very good.

- Wow! - Come on, come on.

- Oh, my gosh. - Come on.

Wow.

Hey.

Here's Harley.

Harley, look at Chicago, buddy.

Look at Chicago.

My heart melted.

It was like pure joy.

It was such a release for me and I know for Harley,

it was like this burden just lifted off of us.

It was like freedom, but more so I could see how

much Harley really enjoyed it.

Strut your stuff, Harley. - Yep.

Come on.

You got this.

- Where is the tail? - It's up.

It's now back up. - That's right.

Head high. - Wow, look.

Yeah.

It's amazing.

Let's go back now.

Wow.

Here.

No tension.

Just chill.

We're just walking in the neighborhood.

This walk is a huge accomplishment,

not only for Harley, but for Miss Sandy, too.

Harley is on his way to becoming a much healthier

and happier dog.

And Sandy is starting to release years of guilt.

This is going to change a whole lot of things.

Yeah.

For more infomation >> Overcoming Walking Anxiety | Cesar Millan's Dog Nation - Duration: 2:16.

-------------------------------------------

The Love Misfits Ascension And Healing For Indigo And Crystal Souls - Duration: 5:56.

The Love "Misfits" - Ascension And Healing For Indigo And Crystal Souls

by Kalayna Colibri,

I come from a thing called �Gen Y�.

I feel this name is apt, because myself and those in my age group ask the question �why�

an awful lot!

I�m not sure when exactly I started asking this question, but I�m sure I was pretty

young at the time, maybe even just learning to talk�

My sense is that we�re supposed to be the generation who does this asking questions

thing, or at least get the ball rolling on it.

Millennials have the chance to deepen this questioning even further, and so many of them

are doing just that.

When I see what�s going on with them and how they�re often marginalized by older/other

generations, I get why they would be.

They, and those of my generation too, are meant to be game-changers.

Many of them feel drawn to activism, veganism, community, and/or just generally making different

choices than anyone who came before them, with a deep knowing inside them that the systems

in place now NEED to shift and change.

Early in my �seeking�years, which really began around age 14, I was labelled as an

�Indigo� because of my age, my determination, my desire to share my soul gifts, and the

things I was passionate about.

I did really identify with this label for a long time, as it explained a lot about me

and actually helped me understand myself a bit better.

These days though, as I go inside and heal more and more, I feel a more crystalline essence

coming through that is transmuting my passion into compassion, my anger into understanding,

and my entitlement around sharing my soul gifts or having what I want, into patient

gratitude and trust.

Through working with inner-punishers and learning to love them, I�m finding that my judgments

toward self and others is shifting into healthy discernment with love, helping to keep me

from going back into the same frustration loops, that were only ever about making myself

suffer anyways.

There is much shadow to be worked in the archetype of the Indigo, it feels like to me, at least

in the way that most of us have related to it up to now, and ascension is the perfect

way to bring that all to light for each of us.

I stand aligned with Mother Gaia in heart, soul and body and have felt that I am more

deeply impassioned and aware of issues regarding her stewardship than some others, which is

another trait we as Indigos and Crystals seem to commonly share.

In meditation the other day, I connected with Mother Gaia and felt deep tears as she held

me with her love, reminding aspects of my soul that worry about her, that she is okay

and can take care of herself, ultimately.

I feel her inviting us all into a space of feeling love with her in mutual care and reverence,

and that all of the anger we have put out towards those who exploit her resources has

actually been a negative output of energy that has been more warrior-like than necessary,

even while standing in peaceful protest.

She does not need an army, but she does need and desire for us to remember the love that

we are and are here to offer as we ascend with her and help others do the same.

Many of us have forgotten our true power and where it comes from, and have needed to do

this for a reason.

However, we all have much power to reclaim now and we have SO much support being offered

to us to do so, even from Gaia herself!

If you would like to try reuniting with Mother Gaia yourself, I created a meditation for

helping you do just that:

Coming into this life as Indigos, Crystals, Rainbows, Starseeds (or a little bit of everything,

as it feels like we could be many of these at once), means we have come in to remember

who we are and find our way back to the power and powerS we have always had access to in

our home frequencies.

So much in 3D reality has densified life with our permission, but we do have the choice

to start lovingly recognizing this and pushing against it like a springboard.

It�s my sense of it, that if this tweaks you, there is some seed inside of you that

needs some love-watering and some wounding that needs to be felt and healed so that you

can remember more of who you ARE.

I don�t think that any of us were ever meant to remain in a long healing process, as we

have the innate capacity to heal deeply in short periods of time whenever necessary.

There is definitely pain to move through together though, and we aren�t meant to do it alone.

If this lands in you, it may be that I am meant to serve you.

If I am, there is so much heart ground I look forward to navigating with you as we work

together to help you remember what you are here to remember!

Regardless of the path you choose for your healing and growth, know that your soul and

heart capacities are being seen and felt, and that your soul purpose will not go on

without you, even and especially while you take time for YOU, to go inside, heal your

heart, and express fully from that beautiful place you�re now re-discovering and uncovering!