Thứ Bảy, 27 tháng 1, 2018

Waching daily Jan 27 2018

Our days topic is cryptocurrency

So the first questions comes in our mind is what is cryptocurrency?

Cryptocurrency is a medium of exchange like normal currencies such as USD but designed for the purpose of

exchanging digital information through a process made possible by certain principles of

cryptography

It is a currency

associated with the internet that uses

cryptography the process of converting legible information into an almost

uncracked able code to track purchases and transfers

Cryptography was born out of the need for secure communication in the Second World War

It has evolved in the digital era with elements of

Mathematical theory and computer science to become a way to secure

communications information and money online

How cryptocurrency is different from banking system?

Now let's see how cryptocurrency is different from regular banking system

unlike centralized banking like the Federal Reserve System

Where government's control the value of a currency like US dollar through the process of printing fiat money?

Government has no control over

Cryptocurrencies as they are fully decentralized

Decentralized means

no central authority controls, but coin or its network of transactions a

Community of Bitcoin miners make up a network

processing the transactions if any changes are made to get coined by a

Developer or developers using github a 51 majority of the miners hashing power must agree upon it

This ensures that in theory no individual can steal your bitcoins or print create more

What is cryptocurrencies and market?

capitalization

That coin is the largest cryptocurrency in both market

Capitalization volume acceptance and notoriety, but it's not the most valuable coin

Nem stake while only having a market cap of 1 million one hundred

Sixteen thousand seven hundred twenty dollars trades at one thousand one hundred seventeen dollars a coin

Looking at the market cap like coin takes second place after Bitcoin with ripple close behind

Important feature of cryptocurrency is crypto mining

Mining is the process by which

Transactions are verified

And added to the public ledger known as the blockchain and also the means through which new Bitcoin are released

What is cryptocurrency hash?

Cryptocurrency mining power is rated on a scale of hashes per seconds a

rig with a computing power of 1 KH s is mining at a rate of

1,000 hashes a second one MH

Second is a million hashes per second and a GH

Second is 1 billion hashes per second

every time a miner

successfully solves a block a new hash is critted a

Hash algorithm turns this large amount of data into a fixed-length hash

For more infomation >> What is Cryptocurrency + Crypto mining + Crypto Hash - Duration: 3:56.

-------------------------------------------

The End of the F***king World is, Weirdly British (or, why it's so fun to watch) - Duration: 5:17.

"The End of the F***ing World" is one of those shows that strikes a perfect balance

between being all too familiar, and yet strangely new.

Based on the comic of the same name, it follows James, a teenage psychopath looking for a chance

to kill a person, and Alyssa, a girl with a fierce temper looking to escape from

her mundane life, as they run away from their small hometown and go on an

adventure to find a new place to start their lives . . .

or at least, that's what Alyssa's doing . . .

It's a fun show with a lot of interesting characters that

blends all the tropes of a typical American roadtrip movie with the

self-deprecating nature of a British comedy, which, while on paper looks like

an incompatible mix, on screen, just works. And today I want to talk about why

this makes "The End of the F***ing World" so much fun to watch . . .

and yes, potential spoilers ahead . . .

The first thing that stands out about the show is its sense of humour.

Like a lot of British comedies, it loves to make fun of itself, from

poking fun at the many tropes and clichés of British and American film and TV,

to pointing out just how utterly deranged or mildly pathetic many of the

situations the show puts its characters through are. And it does so in the most

brilliantly blunt of ways and with the most deadpan of deliveries, which is

something I quite enjoyed. But the show isn't afraid to get ridiculous as it

also more than happily delves into the occasional bit of dumb humour, which

contrasts so heavily with the show's typical jokes that it makes these ones

hit even harder. The show likes to use both dry and dumb wit to make you laugh,

either out of appreciation for the cleverly crafted punchlines, or simply

because you can relate to the awkwardness and hilarity of many of its situations.

F***in' hell!

Likewise the characters and their interactions with each other are not

only smartly written, but also feel genuine. The series is filled with a

variety of quirky characters all with their own weird way of interacting with

the world around them and the people in it, and the various struggles they all

have to go through. Whether it be the happy-go-lucky dad who constantly makes

jokes to trick himself into being happy, the friendly detective who has an

awkward relationship with her partner in crime, or the posh mother with the

perfect life who, doesn't know how to feel about her daughter. Its characters

are exaggerated, but relatable and their relationships with each other help to

amplify the best and worst aspects of their respective personalities.

This is especially apparent with James and Alyssa. They bounce off each other

surprisingly well, with James's blank expression and quiet temperament

emphasizing Alyssa's standoffish nature and blunt deliveries, while Alyssa's

impulsivity and brashness amplify the cold, calculated, and socially inept

aspects of James's character. They, along with everyone else, interact with and

reflect each other naturally, without ever feeling forced, as if these

characters were real people you get to know. Of course, the quirkiness of its

humour and characters are only amplified by the show's stylized presentation.

From the West Anderson like direction that makes every scene and shot look

impossibly symmetrical and strangely picturesque, to the music, which

emphasizes the coming-of-age nature of the story. There are so many little

things that are used to give its presentation a unique flair. Even things

as subtle as the use of a 4:3 aspect ratio for flashbacks and the

specific font and color uses for its text add to its distinct vibe. The show's

style not only makes it stand out from a crowd, but also helps to emphasize its

many quirks. But, like anything else, it has its problems. Specifically in regards

to how it deals with James' psychopathy. Now, there's very little I can talk

about in detail here without spoiling the series, but, to speak in broad terms,

about halfway through the show James's psychopathic tendencies just,

kind of disappear.

And while I'm sure it does serve a role thematically, on a basic story level,

it just makes it feel like a gimmick more than anything else.

And even worse, one that, looking back on the show as a whole, feels kind of pointless.

The show could have easily painted James as simply being a quiet antisocial kid and

everything'd play out more or less the same. And, arguably, it could have made us

more sympathetic towards James and what he goes through, having us see him from the

start as just a kid with problems, rather than seeing him as an emotionless psychopath.

It almost feels like the show wanted to have its cake and eat it too,

by making its main character psychopath to get people's attention, but not having

the courage to fully commit to that idea. And of course, there are many other

structural problems with the show, especially in regards to the way many

plot points in the series seem to happen, just because, and the way many lines,

quite literally, come out of nowhere.

I don't wanna have sex with you.

Wait, what?!

However, for as many problems as I have with it, it's still

incredibly fun to watch. With its quirky humor and unique style, "The End of the F***ing World"

manages to blend together an old formula we've seen done to death, with

various different elements in a way that makes it feel new, and not only keeps you

laughing, but also gets your heart racing as you fear what will happen to its cast

of relatably strange characters. And, though the world doesn't actually end,

It leaves you with a distinct impression of what it's like when the world, as these characters know it,

does.

And yeah, those are my thoughts. If you enjoyed this and

want to see more, check out my last video, where I compare and contrast the

different ways "Doki Doki Literature Club" and "OneShot" break the fourth wall.

Or, watch my video on "Devilman: Crybaby", and why its gore, sex and violence make it so

fun to watch. And don't forget to like, comment, share, and of course, subscribe,

To Come Fly With Me!

You can also follow me on Twitter for updates about this channel

and other stuff, and hopefully, I'll see yous later!

For more infomation >> The End of the F***king World is, Weirdly British (or, why it's so fun to watch) - Duration: 5:17.

-------------------------------------------

Dennis Prager: "I Was Wrong. Donald Trump Is a 'Great President' |MK Today - Duration: 4:02.

Dennis Prager: "I Was Wrong.

Donald Trump Is a 'Great President'.

"My opposition to Donald Trump was wrong," said Dennis Prager, describing Donald Trump

as a "great president" whose political successes are connected to a disregard for

the left-wing and partisan Democrat news media narratives.

Prager's comments came during Thursday's episode of his eponymous radio show.

While Prager has said that Trump was his last choice during the Republican primaries, he

supported him vigorously in the general election against Hillary Clinton.

"The only way to govern [while advancing] the principles of conservatism," said Prager,

was to disregard left-wing and partisan Democrat agitation pushed across the news media landscape.

Prager said:

I was wrong.

My opposition to Donald Trump was wrong, in retrospect.

I was wrong.

I had friends who supported him, and I didn't understand them.

I said, "Are you not aware of what he said about John McCain?

Isn't that enough to disqualify the guy?"

They perceived in him what I did not perceive in him, that these over-the-top statements

– as objectionable as the statements themselves may be, and none of them defended the statements

– nevertheless, what they perceived was accurate: a man who doesn't give a damn

about what the press says about him.

That is the only way to govern.

It is the only way to advance the principles of conservatism in the United States is to

not give a damn.

"[Donald Trump] is so much better a president than Mitt Romney would've made," said

Prager, describing Romney as "tepid" and concerned with appealing to news media outlets

such as The New York Times.

A president's actions are a more important metric of presidential success than a president's

demeanor, said Prager:

Would I like Donald Trump to have Mitt Romney's temperament, or for that matter Barack Obama's

temperament?

Yeah.

So what?

I would like a whole host of things.

People are packages.

What a president does is more important to me than a president's demeanor.

He is so much better a president than Mitt Romney would've made.

Mitt Romney would've awakened every day to read The New York Timeseditorial page to

see how he's covered.

Mitt Romney gave us Romneycare in Massachusetts.

I campaigned for Mitt Romney, he would've been a better president [than Barack Obama].

Any Republican is better than any Democrat, that's just the way it is.

Having said that, Romney would've been a tepid president.

Nothing comparably conservative compared to Donald Trump.

Concerns with a president's demeanor should be secondary to broader analyses of a president's

impact, said Prager.

"He has turned out to be a great president with big communication flaws, in the way he

tweets and some of the things he says and his temperament," said Prager.

"My temperament is the opposite.

I love dignity.

I love understatement.

Okay, so be it.

So what?

I'm not sure I'd be as good a president as he.

How do you like that?

That's how good he's been."

In April of 2017, Prager invited ostensibly conservative NeverTrump news media figures

to celebrate Trump's presidency.

"Do conservatives — or non-leftists, for that matter — appreciate just how terrific

Donald Trump has been as president?" he asked.

"And how lucky we are that he won the presidency?"

"What I do know is that they ought to be deeply appreciative of him, and deeply grateful

for luck or providence, and certainly for Trump himself, that he was elected president,"

continued Prager.

"First, it is unlikely that any other Republican would have defeated Hillary Clinton.

Second, he has not only surpassed many of our expectations but also thus far governed

in a manner more consistent with conservative principles than any president since Ronald

Reagan, and arguably Calvin Coolidge."

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét