TY: Welcome back to "The Truth About Vaccines."
This is episode number 5.
Are you familiar with the HPV vaccine?
How about Hepatitis B, that's given to newborns on day one of life?
Are you familiar with the terms SIDS and Shaken Baby Syndrome?
All of these topics and many more will be addressed in tonight's episode.
I hope you enjoy it.
HPV is short for Human Papilloma Virus.
According to the CDC, HPV is a group of more than 150 related viruses, each of which is
given a number which is called its HPV type.
HPV is the name for the warts, the papillomas, that some HPV types can cause.
Approximately 26 percent of girls and women aged 14-59 have a strain of HPV.
In over 90 percent of these cases, the HPV goes away on its own within two years, and
does not cause any health issues.
The CDC recommends 11 to 12-year-olds get two doses of the HPV vaccine, with the second
dose given 6-12 months after the first dose.
There are two vaccines for HPV: Cervarix and Gardasil, both of which contain aluminum in
one form or another, along with other ingredients that you can see on the screen.
Cervarix is bivalent vaccine developed to protect against infection from HPV types 16
and 18, which are reported to be responsible for 70 percent of all cervical cancer.
Approximately 2 percent of girls and women have been exposed to these two strains.
Gardasil is a quadrivalent vaccine intended to guard against HPV types 6, 11, 16, and
18.
Types 6 and 11 are reported to be responsible for 90 percent of all genital warts.
The CDC recommends the HPV vaccine for girls and for boys.
Here's Dr. Judy Mikovits, a 20-year veteran of the National Cancer Institute, discussing
the HPV vaccine.
DR.
MIKOVITS: The Gardasil, or the Human Papilloma Virus vaccines, are against a virus of which
there are more than 100 strains.
A handful, two or three of those strains, have been associated with cervical cancer,
associated, not causative.
The vaccines, Gardasil, had those two strains in pieces and parts along with various adjuvants
like aluminum to stimulate the immune system to respond to those pieces and parts and protect
against the development of warts, genital warts.
If those genital warts aren't detected early as we would do with a colonoscopy in a polyp—it's
the same thing, it's a general, what a polyp is.
You take those off and start the process over again.
A pap smear, an identification of the genital warts and removal, will stop the cancer, the
tumorigenic process.
What the vaccines were intended to do was stop cancer, cervical cancer.
The big push is on to vaccinate the entire population and prevent the spread of a few
strains of Human Papilloma Virus out of hundreds and theoretically prevent these cancers.
But what we've seen—and it's a good idea.
I mean it's something I worked for, if we could develop an anti-cancer vaccine that
would be great.
To mandate it on an entire population and just not families who were susceptible, or
who had had loses from cervical cancer and had that run in their families, would be the
more appropriate thing to do.
NEIL MILLER: What they did with HPV vaccine, they said—they initially came out with the
HPV vaccine that, they said, "Okay, we know there's 15 different strains of HPV, human
papilloma virus, that can cause cervical cancer, but we're gonna target the two that are causing
the most cases."
They also added two for sexually transmitted warts.
So, you had HPV-16 and HPV-18.
Those are the names that they gave to these two oncogenic strains.
When you target only a handful of strains, when there's multiple strains, the vaccine
is pretty doggone effective at reducing the incidence of disease caused by those particular
strains.
But that's the same—let me give you an analogy.
When a big military, like the United States, goes overseas into Iraq or Iran or Syria,
and we start combatting ISIS or the Taliban, and we take them out, or we lower their ability
to inflict harm, that's the same thing—that's an analogy as to what happens when we have
a vaccine against HPV-16 or HPV-18.
What happens is you create a vacuum.
And now the other strains are gonna come and take their place.
There's evidence that this is happening with HPV as well.
That when they're targeting a handful of strains, new strains are coming that are taking their
place, and these new strains are more prevalent and more virulent.
TY: The HPV vaccine may have reduced the incidence of the particular HPV strains, but new virulent
strains are being created by the vaccine, according to researcher Neil Miller.
This assertion is supported by an article published in February 2016, in the journal
Pediatrics.
The journal indicates the rates of HPV have dropped since the vaccine was introduced in
2006, but the decrease came in on only the four strains included in the vaccine.
However, and I quote, "Any HPV type prevalence was similar in the pre-vaccine era, 54.4 percent,
and the vaccine era, 58.1 percent."
In other words, this study found that although the four types of HPV in the vaccine have
decreased, the prevalence of HPV infection has actually increased 3.7 percent.
Evidence that the vaccine is causing other strains to take the place of those eliminated
through vaccination.
This is exactly what Neil Miller pointed out.
In previous episodes, we covered the fact that many vaccines are actually not tested
against a true placebo control group.
According to the following experts, the HPV vaccine is no different.
BARBARA LOE FISHER: Gardasil vaccine was licensed after only having studied about 1,100 girls
under the age of 16 before it was recommended for all 11 and 12-year-old girls.
1,100 girls followed-up for 2 years.
That is not a database.
That's not a scientific proof that that vaccine is safe for all 11 and 12-year-old
girls.
And now it's being given to 11 and 12-year-old boys as well.
That vaccine was fast-tracked.
Gardasil was fast-tracked.
It was a genetically engineered vaccine using virus-like protein particles, the first time
that it had been done, and they used an aluminum placebo.
DR.
TENPENNY: When they brought the Gardasil vaccine to market, Gardasil has the highest concentration
of aluminum of any vaccine.
And in the safety study, what they used as the placebo was a shot of aluminum.
When they looked at the information at the end and they looked at the side effects, they
said the side effects were the same for the shot of Gardasil as they were for the shot
of aluminum.
So therefore, the vaccine was as safe as the placebo.
DR.
BARK: They had one arm of their placebo.
They had many different groupings.
Let's say they tested this on a few thousand people.
Some got the vaccine and some got placebo.
Let's say 2,000 got the placebo.
Two hundred of those people actually got saline.
TY: Really?
DR.
BARK: The rest got the aluminum adjuvant.
In some cases, they got multiple doses of the aluminum adjuvant.
In some cases, they got three doses of the aluminum adjuvant, while the vaccine group
only got one or two doses of the vaccine.
We know aluminum is neurotoxic.
Chris Exley out of Exeter University in London in England just has published—I mean, many
people have published, but there's a—
I'm saying this because Nature just published it, the journal Nature, who's not been favorable
to vaccines by the way.
They've been quite pro-industry.
They did just publish a paper written by Dr. Exley on specifically aluminum adjuvants and
the neurotoxicity which ensues.
Yehuda Shoenfeld and Tomljenovic have published a textbook on Yehuda's and Tomljenovic's
research on autoimmunity secondary specifically to aluminum adjuvants.
We know that aluminum is not benign.
TY: We've heard the term "placebo" many times in "The Truth About Vaccines," but
what exactly is a placebo?
One definition describes a placebo as "an innocuous or inert medication given as a pacifier
or to the control group in experiments on the efficacy of a drug or vaccine."
But as we just heard, in four of the five trials, Gardasil placebos contained aluminum,
which is a known neurotoxin.
MIKE ADAMS: If you open up a Gardasil package and you read the insert, it says, "Beware.
The person you're injecting may lose consciousness and fall down and hurt themselves and be injured
from loss of consciousness."
Wait a minute.
If a vaccine doesn't affect the brain, how can it cause loss of consciousness?
To so many people that they have to print it on the label?
DR.
BARK: We know from a Canadian study that 10 percent of the people who get Gardasil wind
up in an ER visit, and then I think it's 3 percent of those wind up in a hospitalization
stay.
TY: Really?
DR.
BARK: Yes.
TY: Okay.
DR.
BARK: Yes.
We know that from a published Canadian study.
SAYER JI: When you inject these vaccines, along with all of these proteins, your immune
system's reacting to literally thousands of proteins, producing antibodies, which then
can produce self-antigens or self-antibodies, which then attack the body.
That may explain why, of all the vaccines that have ever been produced, the HPV vaccine
seems to have the most adverse events reports including emergency room visits associated
with it, as well as reports of deaths.
DR.
TENPENNY: The Gardasil vaccine causes so many debilitating things.
In terms of autoimmune conditions, like something called POTS syndrome.
I think there's something upwards to 180 confirmed deaths from that vaccine.
I'd say that's a pretty serious side effect.
TY: Dr. Tenpenny mentioned 180 confirmed deaths from Gardasil.
That was the tally as of 2014.
Using the Med Alert search engine, as of December 31, 2016, there were a total of 43,532 vaccine
reaction reports made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System associated
with Gardasil vaccinations, including 250 deaths.
HPV vaccines account for 25 percent, an entire quarter, of all VAERS reports.
In an April 4, 2016 article published in the journal Vaccine, relating to adverse events
in Alberta, Canada, we see that 195,270 girls tracked after receiving the HPV vaccine injections,
19,351, which is 9.9 percent, ended up in the emergency room within 42 days of being
vaccinated.
Dr. Tenpenny also mentioned an adverse event called POTS, post-orthostatic tachycardia
syndrome, which has been associated with the HPV vaccine, and oftentimes affects teenage
girls and young women.
Robert Krakow is an attorney in New York City that deals with vaccine injury.
Here he is discussing POTS syndrome.
ROBERT KRAKOW: I continued to, recently in the last year or two, receive calls from parents
about their daughters, 15, 16, 17, who had those symptoms that I had heard about earlier.
But now something changed.
I saw first of all, we've been seeing the same thing in other parts of the world.
Denmark, New Zealand, Spain, Colombia, Japan.
What's going on?
Similar syndromes.
Teenage girls who are perfectly healthy in wheelchairs.
Often very athletic.
In other words, they had robust immune systems.
What's happening?
Then we saw a couple of papers in the medical literature describing this syndrome and strongly
associating it with the HPV vaccine.
That told me something is going on here that we have to look at.
Now that is strongly denied by the authorities.
It's being resisted.
We have cases pending like that being resisted in the vaccine court.
In fact, some of the leading experts on the other side, who formulated the whole idea
of this syndrome, POTS, are denying that it occurs.
There is an autoimmune component.
And when we can identify markers of autoimmunity that coincide with the symptoms that are temporally
related to the administration of the vaccine, there's a case there.
TY: In an article published in the May 21, 2015 journal Vaccine, of 35 women that participated
in a study that had been vaccinated with HPV vaccine, 21 of them, 60 percent, were diagnosed
with POTS.
Dr. Sin Hang Lee is a Chinese-American medical doctor and pathologist who received his formal
medical education and training in China.
Dr. Lee has practiced diagnostic cancer pathology in North America for more than 50 years, with
extensive experience in testing HPV DNA in patient samples, and the HPV vaccine, Gardasil.
Here's his story of how he got involved with Gardasil research.
DR.
LEE: Well, I came into the Gardasil vaccine just by accident.
My main purpose in pathology is to find why people get sick, why people die, and how they
die and how they get sick.
So, I developed methods to diagnose HPV accurately.
Based on that publication, some of the women who felt their daughters might be hurt, injured,
by the HPV vaccination, they contact me and say, "Dr. Lee, you can find something in
the vaccine?"
So, it was—
TY: So, they came to you asking you?
They knew that you were an expert at HPV.
They wanted to see if maybe the vaccine had injured their daughter?
DR. LEE: Right.
Nobody else wanted to listen to what their opinions are.
TY: Right.
DR. LEE: They just found my reputation in terms of publication.
And they said, "Could you help?"
Initially I didn't want to get involved in it, because I thought it was unlikely to
find anything in a vaccine in terms of HPV DNA, because the manufacturing and FDA, all
these say, "DNA has been removed."
And it should not have any residual viral DNA left.
But one of the mothers showed me a report, actually from Toronto, and said, "Look,
my daughter's blood had HPV DNA in it."
And the report came from a Toronto independent lab.
"And my daughter was 13 years old, and she was sexually not active.
There was no way for her to get HPV infection."
TY: Except for the vaccine.
DR.
LEE: Except for the vaccine.
So, I saw the report.
I talked to the PhD who did the test in Toronto, and he convinced me that he did find HPV DNA
in it.
So, the first thing, "Okay, in that case I have to test the vaccine first and see whether
the HPV vaccine indeed contained any HPV DNA in it."
If it didn't contain any HPV DNA, there's no point for me to look for anything else.
TY: So, you tested the vaccine then?
DR.
LEE: Right.
I tested the vaccine.
TY: What did you find?
DR.
LEE: Many mothers, in New Zealand, in Australia—I don't know about Australia, but in New Zealand,
in America, in I think some European countries.
So, they send the specimen to me to test it.
I tested every one of them for HPV DNA.
TY: All of them had HPV DNA in them?
DR.
LEE: Yeah, the ones I tested.
TY: Okay.
And this is after the FDA said that they don't contain any DNA?
DR.
LEE: Right.
When you have free viral DNA in a vaccine, and that contains aluminum, and the one HPV
DNA molecules bound to the aluminum.
And that new complex may be potentially risky when you inject into a human being.
So, that's why.
And also, at the same time, one of the girls died in New Zealand.
And they got a court order to send the postmortem specimen to me to analyze.
Then I found the HPV-16 viral DNA left in the blood of the postmortem material, and
in the spleen as well.
TY: So, the autopsy showed HPV DNA?
DR.
LEE: Right.
TY: What does that mean?
Does that mean that it's likely that they died from the vaccine?
What is the conclusion?
DR.
LEE: I think most likely from the vaccine.
And usually, the vaccine DNA, when it binds with aluminum, they change the conformation
to so-called non-B conformation.
And the HPV DNA left in the autopsy material was in non-B conformation.
The DNA I found in the postmortem material was not a natural DNA from the virus.
So, it's most likely from the vaccine.
TY: Just to summarize, Dr. Lee found free viral DNA in the HPV vaccine with every sample
that he tested, despite FDA claims that the vaccine does not contain free viral DNA.
Dr. Lee found HPV viral DNA in the blood of a New Zealand girl who had died, and concluded
that the vaccine had killed the girl.
Dr. Lee is well-known for his involvement in the Joel Gomez case.
Joel was just 14 years old.
Medical records show that he was a healthy boy who made all his checkups at his pediatrician's
office.
He had no pre-existing health issues.
He had no cardiac abnormalities, psychological disorders, substance abuse, or any other issues.
But he had the HPV vaccine the day before he died.
DR.
LEE: The boy was training for football, playing in high school.
TY: So, he was in good shape.
DR.
LEE: He was in good shape.
The boy was followed by the pediatrician from birth.
There's no question about the health problems.
No health issue at all.
Regularly followed by the pediatricians and documented.
And he was injected with one dose of Gardasil in June or something.
No problem.
And then continued to play football.
Two months later and the boy was injected with a second dose of Gardasil and then went
home.
He told his mother that he was not feeling well.
Went to sleep.
The next morning, dead.
TY: He never woke up?
DR.
LEE: They found him dead.
Never woke up.
So, the lawyers told me to review the case.
I read, I saw it.
And I think this is a potentially—I think it's most likely due to Gardasil vaccination
on the second part.
The first injection probably induced a silent heart attack.
And the boy was physically good enough—not feeling it.
Maybe some discomfort.
But he continued to be active in sports.
But the second Gardasil, in the afternoon in the few hours, and that may have caused
the problem.
The second part.
TY: Wow.
DR. LEE: In an already physically damaged heart.
TY: So, the first Gardasil vaccine damaged his heart most likely, the second one killed
him?
DR.
LEE: Right.
TY: The parents of Joel Gomez have filed a lawsuit in the federal vaccine court, based
largely upon the autopsy findings of Dr. Lee.
"Gardasil did cause or contributed to a myocardial infarction in the decedent, and
that the second dose of Gardasil finally caused a fatal hypotension in this case on the day
of vaccination.
There was no other plausible cause for the death of Joel Gomez."
In an ABC News interview in September of 2009, Dr. Diane Harper, who is one of the scientists
that developed the HPV vaccine, admitted that "The rate of serious adverse events is greater
than the incidence rate of cervical cancer.
The incidence of cervical cancer in the U.S. is so low that if we get the vaccine and continue
Pap screening, we will not lower the rate of cervical cancer in the US.
If you vaccinate a child, she won't keep immunity in puberty, and you do nothing to
prevent cervical cancer."
I've heard that this is a public health concern.
My question is why are we vaccinating boys for a virus that causes cervical cancer?
DR.
MIKOVITS: Cancer is not a public health concern.
Public health officials should not be mandating or recommending or spending tremendous amounts
of taxpayer money.
Because they're taxpayer funded programs to vaccinate everyone; to vaccinate everyone.
What we're finding now, is where we are seeing a huge, almost 10 percent, one in 10
people who are injected, inoculated with these vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, is the other
one, are developing neurological diseases, Chronic Lyme disease, reactivated infections,
serious narcolepsy, as we found with the Swine flu vaccine of a few years ago.
Serious, serious damage to the point where teenagers can't return to high school when
they were award-winning students and in the gifted and talented programs.
I know a few in my church there in Carlsbad, and 15-year-old boys.
I mean why are we doing this?
TY: According to the CDC, every year in the United States, around 11,000 men get cancers
caused by HPV infections.
When it comes to cancer in females, like cervical cancer, our experts indicated that there are
better methods of detection and prevention than the HPV vaccine.
DR. MIKOVITS: Cervical cancer is not a communicable disease.
In fact, those vaccines have never been shown to prevent a single case of cervical center.
They prevent genital warts, but we can fix that.
It's pretty easy.
We do it once a year.
If you're a woman, you go and get your pap smear and fix that problem.
DR. LEE: From the very beginning, as a pathologist, I've been reading pap smear for cervical
cancer prevention all my life.
I don't think there is a need for a vaccine to prevent HPV infection at all.
There's no need to it because the pap smear, the cervical cancer screening program by the
gynecologists are adequate to prevent cervical cancer in American women.
TY: Mario Lamo-Jimenez is a journalist from Columbia.
I had the privilege of interviewing him at the Autism One conference in Chicago last
year.
Mario, you were one of the first ones, or the first one in Colombia, where you're
from, to write an article about Gardasil, correct?
MARIO LAMO-JIMENEZ: Yes, that's right.
That was in 2013.
I saw an article in the newspaper.
It was a paper that I was writing for a blog, and they say the Ministry of Health is going
to vaccinate 3 and a half million girls against the HPV virus with the Gardasil vaccine.
I was living in California for 20 years and I have some information about vaccines.
So, when I saw the headlines in the newspaper, I wrote an article for the same newspaper.
All the dangers of the vaccine, because it was known that it had side effects, all over
the world where it was applied.
I wrote the article.
It was the first article known about the vaccine, and also, they hadn't started the vaccination
campaign officially at that point.
The reaction of the paper was, "Can you prove what you're saying there?"
And they said I had to submit another article with more quotes, with sources.
So, I submitted a 50-page article that was supporting what I had said in the 3-page article
but they said, "No, we cannot publish this because we are going to be sued by Merck,
and you're going to be sued by Merck."
So, they censored the article and they closed the blog.
In Colombia, there is a town called Carmen de Bolivar.
And Carmen de Bolivar is a very interesting town because it's a very close, ethnic population.
It is like native population that hasn't mixed very much with whites or blacks.
It's like the original population.
And they went to that town and they had a massive vaccination at the schools.
And then the girls started to faint, the vaccinated girls, and the numbers grew every day.
When I started writing, it was 70, then 125, then 400, until there were 700 girls affected
by the vaccine.
What happened to them is they started to faint and that's part of the effects of the vaccine
and that's been documented.
There's not enough blood circulation and they lose consciousness, and they were taken
to the hospital.
And the government response was "This is not related to the vaccine.
This is the case of mass hysteria."
That's the first answer, without having conducted any tests, without anything.
It was like something that they had ready in their script.
And then they said—well, the parents had a big demonstration.
I think it's one of the first demonstrations in the world where people were demonstrating
against a vaccine.
They carried signs, they took up to the streets.
So, the government had to send representatives from the Ministry of Health to talk to them,
and they made many promises.
"Yes, we're going to tell you what's going on.
We'll offer you whatever help you need."
They commissioned a study about Carmen de Bolivar through the National Institute of
Health, and they had like three months to produce the study.
And after three months, instead of producing the study, they started filtering to the press,
like headlines from the study.
"No connection with the vaccine.
This is a case of mass hysteria."
But they didn't publish the story, so I had to write a letter to that National Institute
of Health and have what's called a right of petition and tell them I need to see this
study, because it wasn't published anywhere.
One week later, I got a response, I got the study, and they put the study in their website.
The story was a whitewash.
It didn't contain any substance, it has just statistics that didn't prove anything.
They didn't interview the girls, they didn't conduct any tests, they didn't talk to outside
experts.
It was like it was pre-planned.
That's the story that they put to the public.
The vaccine is perfectly right and the girls are crazy.
Many started receiving psychiatric drugs, for example.
The clip that I've shown you is one of the girls that they said—from Carmen de Bolivar,
they said "You're crazy, we're going to take you to a psychiatric hospital,"
and then she tries to kill herself.
TY: Many young women in Columbia who were damaged by the HPV vaccine, tried to kill
themselves, and some succeeded.
Why did they try to kill themselves?
Because they were told that they were being hysterical and there was nothing wrong with
them.
Here's the video to which Mario was referring.
This was taken in the town of Carmen de Bolivar, where 700 young women and girls were damaged
by the HPV vaccine.
VIDEO IN SPANISH
TY: It's so sad that
these girls are blamed rather than given assistance.
It reminds me of the people that died of lung cancer after smoking cigarettes that the medical
world told them were healthy, back in the 1950s.
DR.
THOMAS: There's a glaring example of sort of tobacco science, I'll call it, when we
look at the HPV vaccine.
That's my least favorite vaccine and I'll tell you why.
When it first came up, the HPV-4, how did doctors learn about new things?
I've been in practice 30 years, so obviously, this was brand new, and I might go to a conference
on something and learn something new or I might have—well they call them drug reps.
I actually let them in my practice because I just want to know what's going on out there.
There are practices that say, "We're not going to talk to drug reps," and I honor
that as well.
I see the value of just trying to keep it pure, but I want all of the information I
can get and then I'll go and do my own research and try to figure out what's really going
on.
So, a drug rep comes into my office with the new HPV information, and they're touting this
great vaccine.
In fact, I'm invited to a dinner that's put on by a professor at the university, OHSU,
one of the infectious disease professors.
I don't drink, but my colleagues start drinking wine and we're getting served wonderful food
and we're hearing this wonderful talk about HPV and how wonderful it is, it's going to
prevent cancer.
"Look at these studies showing decreased cancer."
And we walked out of there thinking this is a really great vaccine.
In fact, I ordered some for my office, so that's why you shouldn't have drug reps in
your office.
I just answered my own question.
But I learned real quick.
So, I'm looking at the studies that were done by the company that makes this vaccine, and
there was something that bothered me.
In vaccine studies, if you're really going to compare the side effects for the vaccine
compared to not, you need to do placebo.
And placebo, if you're injecting a vaccine, should be injecting saline.
That's the placebo.
Well they injected the same huge dose of aluminum as was in the vaccine.
I'm already aware that aluminum's a huge toxin.
There's studies associating aluminum with Gulf War syndrome, with all sorts of neurological
problems.
So, that's not a valid study but it was accepted.
They actually stopped their research early because they saw a slight decrease in cervical
dysplasia.
It has never prevented a single case of cancer, but they got what they wanted.
They found some decreased cervical dysplasia in their study group and they stopped the
study.
"This is our wonderful vaccine.
We're going to prevent cancer."
And it went to the market.
Down the road, they come up with the HPV-9, the new Gardasil.
And guess what they used for that placebo?
HPV-4.
So instead of injecting that one with saline, they used their own vaccine that never had
a proper placebo as the placebo, and they just compare those two and say, "Look at
these side effects.
They're the same, so it's safe."
Well if you look at the actual deaths, just look at deaths.
There will be more deaths from that vaccine than there will ever be cervical cancer.
You just look at the number of studied and the number of deaths and it's horrendous.
And yet it got fast tracked.
Approved by the FDA, fast tracked, and now it's being pushed big-time in the US.
I see commercials on TV.
"I wish I had known, I wish my parents had told me."
It's just pulling at the heartstrings.
It's just marketing.
So, they've got a faulty product and they want to make money on it, so what do they
do?
They do marketing.
TY: When we lived in Panama, Central America, our youngest child Charity was born.
After she was a few days old, we went to the local register to apply for a birth certificate.
They told us that we needed to show proof of Hepatitis B vaccine before they'd give
us a birth certificate.
Since Hepatitis B is a disease primarily in intravenous drug users and sexually active
individuals, neither of which was three-day-old Charity, we didn't understand why.
Now Charlene was and is Hepatitis B negative.
So, according to the medical literature, Charity had zero risk of having Hepatitis B or contracting
it.
We're about to dive a bit deeper into Hepatitis B vaccine, which is given to babies in the
United States and in Panama on day one of life.
DR.
MARGULIS: I had a baby and in the hospital, I had a really difficult labor and delivery.
And in the hospital, right after the baby was born the nurse said to me, "Okay, it's
time for your Hepatitis B vaccine."
And I was in graduate school at the time.
I have a PhD from Emory University.
I was very educated and I knew that I was Hepatitis B negative because I had had excellent
prenatal care and I have had this really difficult birth and I had this little baby in my arms,
and I said to the nurse, "I'm not sure that I want to do that.
I feel a little uncomfortable.
I want to talk to my pediatrician."
The nurse got really angry at me and there was just this huge like look on her face like
that I was saying something like I was trying to kill my child.
And all I wanted was to protect this child and I had just said "I just want to talk
to my doctor about it."
And that really stayed with me.
That kind of put up a red flag and I had never thought about questioning vaccines.
I've been very vaccinated, I have lived and worked in West Africa, both in the 1990s,
and then later in 2006, I brought my family back.
And I've always felt like vaccines were a really important tool in the medical toolbox.
But I didn't know why a tiny newborn, born to Hepatitis B negative parents, would need
to have a Hepatitis B vaccine.
Then something really unbelievable happened.
Two weeks later when we went back to the pediatrician, I was so worried that I had said no to this
vaccine because I wanted to do what the doctors told me.
I knew that they had our best interests in mind and my husband and I were these Nervous
Nellie new parents.
And we said, "Gosh we didn't do that because we were both Hepatitis B negative and we didn't
think it was a necessary vaccine," and the doctor completely casually she says, "Oh,
it's a good thing you didn't do that, that vaccine has been counter indicated in newborns."
My husband and I looked at each other with white faces, like the blood just drained from
my face, because we thought "What if we had said yes to this vaccine?
And now she's telling me it's been counter indicated."
This was a very strange thing and it took me 10 years to figure out what had actually
happened.
Which is that in 1999, the CDC realized that they had never counted up the cumulative exposure
to mercury that was being given in the infant vaccine schedule.
It just so happened my daughter was born in July of 1999.
It just so happened that it was at that moment that they had issued—a statement had gone
out to every pediatrician in the country saying, "In the interest of caution, let's not do
the Hepatitis B at birth because of the worry about mercury exposure."
So, it wasn't technically true that it had been counter indicated, and as you know we
still give the Hepatitis B vaccine to newborns.
It no longer contains thimerosal.
It's still a completely problematic and probably completely unnecessary vaccine.
But at that time, it was the best thing that could have ever happened to us because it
made me realize that we needed to really do the research for ourselves.
TY: Are you enjoying Episode 5 thus far?
Are you learning a lot of great and valuable information?
Do you want to join our movement and support our mission to educate the world on the truth
about vaccines?
Then please consider supporting our mission by owning the complete series today.
Your support allows us to continue to spread the truth for free.
Plus, a portion of each and every sale is donated to charities that are doing real research
to help our kids be healthier and safer.
Simply click the banner below to join our movement and support our mission.
Thanks in advance.
Now, let's go back to Episode 5 for more valuable information on vaccines.
BARBARA LOE FISHER: I remember in 1991 when the CDC said, "every newborn baby in the
newborn nursery must get a Hepatitis B shot before leaving that nursery."
Hepatitis B vaccine was a vaccine for a disease that had a very low incidence in the United
States.
Hepatitis B has been endemic in certain parts of Asia and Africa, but it's never been
a problem in the United States, Europe, or Canada.
However, they said, "Oh, got to give all these babies the Hepatitis B shot at birth,
even though the high-risk groups are adult groups."
IV drug users being the leading group.
Eighty percent of IV drug users have Hepatitis B. But there was almost—in 1991, less than
one half of 1 percent of mothers had Hepatitis B who could possibly give their newborns Hepatitis
B.
And when that policy came out, I remembered going to a meeting in the 1980s at the CDC.
I was there with the mother reporting the death of her son from DPT vaccine.
And as we waited to talk, there was a presentation on Hepatitis B vaccine by a manufacturer who
said, "Look, if you can't get the high-risk groups in this country, the IV drug users,
people with multiple sexual partners, to use this vaccine, you're going to just have
to pass laws to shoot it into the arms of every high school kid in this country because
we're not going to have an orphan drug on our hands."
And instead of shooting it into every high school kid, although they're doing that
too, they decided to get the babies.
The little babies at 12 hours of age in the newborn nursery when you have absolutely no
idea the immune status of that child, the neurological status of that child, when that
baby has just emerged from the womb and you are going to stick a Hepatitis B shot in that
child, when most mothers, 99.99 percent of mothers are not Hepatitis B positive and there's
no risk to that baby for Hepatitis B?
And then you know that the Hepatitis B antibodies wear off and when the child becomes a teenager
and may become a drug user or sexually active or multiple partners, may not be protected?
This was a policy that had absolutely no science behind it.
DR.
LEVATIN: Early in my practice, I did do some vaccinations, but I didn't do them under
six months of age, because I knew the main window of SIDS was six months of age and under.
And I would offer them an elective procedure to people, like "You can choose this or
not choose it."
We would do one at a time, spread them out, do the ones parents wanted, not the ones they
didn't want.
That was my approach to it, because I always viewed it as an elective procedure.
I mean subsequently, as it came around, when they introduced the Hepatitis B vaccine for
one-day-old infants, and then the chicken pox vaccine, I just said to myself "I'm
never going to give those vaccines as a routine."
And I don't really agree with the whole vaccination schedule as it is.
So, I just at a certain point decided to stop vaccinating in my practice.
TY: They mandate it in many states.
On the first day of birth you get a Hep-B vaccine.
DR.
CENTERS: So, why would they do that?
Do you know why they would do that?
TY: I have no idea.
I don't know any one-day-olds that are sexually active or that use drugs.
DR.
CENTERS: Well, the thing is that there is a concept in Western medicine called epidemiology.
And the epidemiological idea is to vaccinate for the most severe condition with the total
population.
When you sign up for your child to have a vaccine, that doesn't guarantee that the
vaccine is working, and it doesn't guarantee, or it doesn't mean that that vaccine is
going to work with your individual child.
If you read the disclaimer very closely, it says that you are signing up for a vaccine
program.
That vaccine program is going to protect supposedly the mass population.
So, you take Hepatitis B. Where did Hepatitis B come from?
Well, they initially did those studies in the Bronx, in New York, back in the 80s and
90s.
At that time, there was this disproven theory that Hepatitis B and HIV were related.
One of their primary study groups were teenagers, adolescents, who had become infected with
HIV.
The question was, was this vaccine safe and effective?
Well, so you have this HIV clinic of teenagers.
What teenager is going to sign up for an experimental vaccine?
Even though they were paying these kids like $100 to get the vaccine.
Well, the kids that signed up, which is a very small percentage.
So, when it came to the ACIP meeting, which is American Academy of Infectious Disease
Practices, which makes the decisions on which vaccine needs to be in the schedule, the company
had written in their paper, "The only way to completely protect the children in the
Bronx is to vaccinate these children at day one."
So, they came and they gave them a piece of paper, and the little piece of paper was yellow
and highlighted so they would see "day one."
And that's how the vaccine schedule came to be.
So, yeah, if you think that your child is going to be fooling around with the kid in
the next bassinet, you might want to give them the Hepatitis B vaccine.
But if that's not your child, then I think you want to be careful in considering these
vaccines.
DR.
THOMAS: In 2001, at least here in Oregon, we had this huge push, and I think it happened
nationwide for pediatricians to move the Hepatitis B vaccine from teenagers to newborns.
And I remember when they made that push and I'm going, "This makes no sense."
So, you catch Hepatitis B from sex and IV drug use.
Babies don't do that.
Well, you can catch it from the mother.
That's true, that's the only way a baby can get Hepatitis B is if their mother has Hepatitis
B. And the babies in my practice, to this day, I haven't had a single mom with Hepatitis
B. That's how rare it is.
You go to the CDC website and they say it's 1 in 100 moms have Hepatitis B. But even that,
I think it's less than that.
Depending where you work, I suppose.
But even that, we're injecting a huge toxic dose of aluminum to a newborn on day one of
life for a vaccine they don't need.
You might ask, how did they talk you into doing that.
Because I remember walking down the halls of the hospital, talking to a couple of fellow
pediatricians, "Can you believe this, we're supposed to give Hepatitis B to newborns?"
And they said, "Well, they're saying we might develop a population immune to Hepatitis
B.
We can eradicate it."
Sounded good.
TY: The herd immunity concept.
DR.
THOMAS: Yes, and I couldn't argue with it.
It hadn't been tried.
So, I'm a pro-vaccine pediatrician, vaccines are the best thing we can do to protect children.
And so, we did it.
In 2002 in our office, we made this huge shift and we started—not only were we giving all
the newborns their first Hep-B in the hospital, at 2 months, get your second dose, and at
six months, your third dose.
On top of the already fairly busy schedule.
And we were catching up the other kids.
So, my own kids were in that sort of catchup phase.
They were past the infant stage but they weren't teenagers.
So, a lot of Hepatitis B vaccine being done at that point.
And that was the same time we took thimerosal out of the vaccines.
And I think about that, because when people talk about the autism rates that have continued
to go up.
Some of the studies have said, well there was no change in the autism rate when they
stopped the thimerosal, so therefore it wasn't the thimerosal.
Yeah, but we added the Hepatitis B, a huge, huge increased dose of that neurotoxin right
at the same time.
TY: Aluminum?
DR.
THOMAS: Aluminum.
TY: Again, we have a vaccine that contains massive doses of aluminum, which is a known
neurotoxin.
In this next segment, Dr. Paul Thomas, a board-certified pediatrician, runs through the calculation
of exactly how much aluminum a newborn baby is getting in the Hepatitis B vaccine.
DR.
THOMAS: It is vital that we start looking at the aluminum content of vaccines the same
way we did for mercury.
Thimerosal.
Because we are far exceeding the safe doses.
Just use the newborn Hepatitis B dose as an example.
It has 250 micrograms of aluminum.
Remember we're not supposed to exceed five micrograms per kilogram.
What does a baby weigh?
At the most, five kilos.
I mean that's an eleven-pound baby, practically.
So, five times five, a five-kilo baby don't exceed five micrograms per kilogram.
25 micrograms of aluminum is what is supposedly the safe limit.
With any toxin, we've learned, like what we did with lead, there's no safe dose.
But even if you go with that dose, we know if you exceed that, it's not safe, and we're
injecting 250 micrograms.
Ten times the possibly safe dose.
Known toxin injected into every baby born in America.
This is what bugged me since 2001, when they moved that Hep-B to newborns and nobody cared.
Nobody made a fuss.
Nobody looked into it.
It was like, "All right, we got a problem."
And the magnitude of the problem is just growing.
DR.
TENPENNY: The Hepatitis B vaccine has a very, very long list of neurological complications
from blindness to Guillain-Barre to all kinds of—a very long list of neurological complications.
There really isn't any reason to even give that vaccine at birth.
DR.
MARGULIS: Doctors in America do not give their children the Hepatitis B vaccine at birth
because they know it's not safe and they know it's not necessary and even though they recommend
it for their patients, they don't do it for their own families.
POLLY TOMMEY: And here's the scary thing, that I had no idea about, is that when you
take your child in and you say to your doctor, "Is it safe?" or you're assuming it's
safe, and he goes "Yeah, yeah, yeah."
Because no one takes responsibility if your child's damaged.
So, that's what I want to get across to these parents today.
They can say "Yes, it's safe" all they like.
They're protected.
They can do whatever they like because they're not responsible for what is about to happen
to your child.
DEL BIGTREE: And the pharmaceutical industry's protected.
I don't know if people realize it, but in 1986 they passed the Vaccine Injury Compensation
Act.
What this did was basically, the pharmaceutical industry said "We're getting so many lawsuits,
we have so many kids getting injured, and we're tired of getting sued.
So, we're going to stop making vaccines unless the government protects us."
They blackmailed our government, saying "You have to protect us from liability."
And so, Ronald Reagan signed the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act, which ultimately says "You
cannot sue a vaccine manufacturer if their product injures your child."
And then right after that, right after that, that's when you see—we all got maybe 7,
maybe 10 vaccines as kids.
And we're healthy, right?
It's working.
I want to ask parents why would you change something that's working?
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Well, you can see right after the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act, we go from 10 to
69 vaccines all of a sudden, all these brand-new.
More than 270 vaccines are in the pipeline right now.
This is a perfect business model, they can't be sued by a product—it's like putting
out cars that don't have brakes.
"What do I care?
You can't sue me.
What difference does it make?"
So, you injure the child.
Now they have to use the hospitals and medicines and medications the rest of their life.
A lot of these autistic children are on like 18-20 different medications.
POLLY TOMMEY: Hardcore psychiatric drugs, mindless drugs, is what they put these poor
kids on.
And then they wonder why they've got—the ones that are high functioning, terrible suicidal
tendencies, do crazy things, and it's because they're drugged up.
And the parents.
They might as well just drug the parents as well, because parents are so tired, they're
so exhausted, and they end up at the doctor for whatever reason.
I've been there, to the doctor, not for anything to do with me, to do with my child,
and they say "Oh my gosh, you look really tired.
I'm going to give you something to sleep.
I'm going to give you something to wake up.
I'm going to give you something to deal with your depression, your anxiety, your sadness,
everything.
Here's a pile of drugs for you.
Oh, and your kids, your other kids they look sad.
The siblings look sad.
Let's give them something as well."
TY: Wow.
POLLY TOMMEY: We've got a drug for everything, everything now.
You go to your doctor with the tiniest comment, and you will be given a piece of paper, a
prescription for that.
DEL BIGTREE: Which leads to really what people need to understand, is the future of the pharmaceutical
industry is vaccines.
It's getting harder and harder for them to be able to make money off of drugs for
several reasons.
Too much competition, there's five or six different versions of the drug going at the
same disease from different companies competing with each other.
But even more so, one of the biggest problems you have is in order to test a drug, which
has to go through very rigorous, long-term safety studies, that vaccines do not, in order
to do that, you have to find people that aren't already on a drug.
In a test group, they have to not already be on a drug.
And we're now at a place in America where 1 in 2 are on drugs, on one drug or another.
So, just finding a test group is getting extremely expensive.
Now, on the other hand, you have vaccines which don't have to go through long-term
safety studies.
You don't have to find test groups.
You can just—the Hep-B vaccine that we put into a day-one-old baby spent four days being
tested before it was put on the market.
I just found out five or six days ago, CBS just reported we have more infants die on
the first day of life in the United States than all of the other industrial nations combined.
TY: Wow.
DEL BIGTREE: And then you ask yourself, why would that be?
Well, we're one of the only countries that, on the very first day of life, "Hello, welcome
to the world.
You're gasping for your first breath and we're injecting you with a sexually transmitted
disease.
Welcome to the United States of America."
I mean and then the injection not only is a sexually transmitted disease that you will
not come in contact with until you are actually sexually active or you're sharing needles,
but it's also packed with aluminum, a neurotoxin, in a baby that is literally gasping for its
first breaths on this earth.
TY: Del Bigtree just mentioned that Hepatitis B vaccine was tested four days before it was
put on the market.
Merck stated in their 1993 product insert that "In a group of studies, 1,636 doses
of the Hepatitis B vaccine were administered to 653 healthy infants and children up to
10 years of age, who were monitored for five days after each dose."
Del also just mentioned that the USA has more infant deaths than any other country.
A study by Neil Miller and Dr. Gary Goldman supports this assertion.
Here is Neil Miller discussing that study.
NEIL MILLER: He and I worked on a study together, and we looked at the Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System, which is a jointly owned database, jointly owned by the CDC and the
FDA.
It's a federal database, where people, doctors and parents, can report adverse reactions
to vaccines.
If they get a vaccine and they think that that vaccine caused the problem, they can
report it.
And we, as independent researchers, were able to download the entire Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System.
We were able to extract, out of that, all the infants that had reports.
We had 38,000 reports of infants that had adverse reactions to vaccines.
And then we looked at—Dr. Gary Goldman is a computer scientist as well, and created
a program that was able to stratify these babies, these infants, by the number of doses
that they received.
So, we had 38,000 infants that had adverse reactions reported to the Vaccine Adverse
Event Reporting System, and then we were able to stratify these infants that they received
two doses of vaccines, three doses, four doses, five doses, six doses, seven doses, or eight
doses before they had their adverse reaction.
And then we were—we only were interested in looking at "Did these children end up with
a serious adverse reaction?"
We weren't interested in babies that just had a mild reaction.
Maybe they had a little pain at the injection site, or maybe they had a fever after they
received a vaccine.
We only wanted to look at "Were these babies hospitalized?
Was their adverse event serious enough that it required them to be hospitalized, and/or
did they die after receiving that vaccine?"
And what we found was that babies that received eight vaccines were statistically significantly
more likely to be hospitalized or die than babies that received seven, six, five, four,
three, or two vaccines at the same time.
Babies that received seven vaccines at the same time were statistically significantly
more likely to be hospitalized or die than babies that received six, five, four, three,
or two vaccines at the same time.
So, what we documented was that the more vaccines that a baby receives simultaneously, the more
dangerous it is.
The more likely that baby is to be hospitalized or die.
DR.
LEVATIN: Early in my career I saw three babies die of SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome,
within 24 hours of being vaccinated.
It wasn't like everybody who was getting vaccinated had SIDS, but every SIDS case that
I ever encountered had—the baby had just been vaccinated within the last 24 hours.
And I just knew in my heart that something was wrong.
TY: Is it possible that some SIDS deaths are actually vaccine injury that's misclassified?
DR.
THOMAS: I think it's absolutely possible.
As a pediatrician, I was trained that vaccines are safe and effective, and of course they
have nothing to do with SIDS.
SIDS is Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.
Whenever you hear "syndrome" at the end of something, it means we don't know.
These kids just died.
In fact, I just saw an article this morning.
I was looking over some things, and I think it was from 2007, but there was somewhere
overseas, there were twins who died within hours of getting their vaccine.
Within the next day.
Both of them.
And it's like, boy when you read that, it was presented as a case report of you can
have—I forget how they named the study but twins who die of SIDS.
So, this unknown death of unknown cause.
Hmm, they incidentally both got vaccinated the day before.
To me, that's not a coincidence.
TY: The CDC's official position is that SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, is not
caused by vaccines and that there is no connection.
Any relationship is purely coincidental.
Perhaps due to the fact that the peak age for SIDS is 2-4 months, which coincides with
the introduction of 11 shots containing 16 vaccines within the U.S. vaccination schedule
has led to the CDCs official statement on SIDS, found at CDC.gov.
Here's the statement.
"Babies receive many vaccines when they are between 2-4 months old.
This age range is also the peak age for sudden infant death syndrome, or SIDS, or infant
death that cannot be explained.
The timing of the 2-month and the 4-month shots and SIDS has led some people to question
whether they might be related.
However, studies have found that vaccines do not cause and are not linked to SIDS."
However, in 2011, there was a study was published in Statistics in Medicine that reviewed 300
unexplained deaths.
Here's what they found.
They found "A 16-fold risk increase after the 4th dose of a quadrivalent vaccine."
That's with four different viruses, and they could detect that with at least 90 percent
accuracy.
They also found "A general two-fold increase after vaccination could be detected with a
power of 80 percent."
DR.
SAHNI: So, there is a study.
I'm actually going to quote from that study, but it was in the Journal of Medicine and
Chemistry, and it was this year, 2017 actually.
And in a 2017 study published in the current Journal of Medicine and Chemistry concluded
that "There exists a need that deaths occurring in a short space of time," in other words,
shortly after, "a hexavalent vaccination are appropriately investigated and submitted
to a postmortem," which basically is an autopsy "examination, particularly of the
autonomic nervous system," a specific part of your nervous system, "by an expert pathologist."
We're talking about taking tissue and looking at it under a microscope, "to objectively
evaluate the possible causative role of a vaccine in SIDS."
So, I don't know that it's definitive.
It certainly doesn't sound like it's definitive.
But this study concluded that, in other words, "If I hit you in the toe with a hammer,
and you have pain one second later, I wonder what caused your toe pain?"
Probably the hammer.
So, if I give you an injection, and shortly after that you become extremely ill and die,
I think there probably needs to be an investigation as to why that child died.
SIDS is an enigma.
There's probably lots of causes of it, but there obviously are cases where a child received
a hexavalent vaccination and died in a very short period of time from the time that the
vaccination was given.
And that's what that study concluded.
So, do vaccines cause SIDS?
I don't know.
But it looks to be possible.
If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck.
I hit you in the toe with the hammer and it hurt right at the second after I hit you.
It probably wasn't something you did yesterday.
It's probably the hammer that I just hit you with.
If you get hit with a vaccine, you die, it probably needs to be looked at.
TY: We definitely need to investigate this further.
I know that there are many parents who are currently serving prison sentences for killing
their baby by shaking them to death.
This is called Shaken Baby Syndrome.
DR.
O'SHEA: Doesn't it seem weird that all of a sudden after all this time thousands
of people are deciding to kill their babies by shaking them to death, doesn't that seem
odd, doesn't that seem unreasonable?
And then the more I researched it, then I realized that it was a cover up for vaccine
injury.
And that's really what you find when you research this topic shaken baby syndrome.
JACK WOLFSON: When a good doctor takes a good history on someone, they find out when their
condition started.
We want to find out what the issues were at that time.
Oftentimes when I take that history on people we do see that there was a vaccine that just
preceded the onset of their symptoms.
I look back and if someone has a thyroid condition that started a couple of weeks, a couple of
months after a round of vaccines or even something just like the flu shot, they start developing
symptoms, we have to think that there's some correlation between that vaccination
and the onset of thyroid disease.
TY: According to Dr. Jack Wolfson, doctors should try to determine when a condition started.
And then once that happens, they can determine if it was or was not vaccine-related.
I know that this has happened several times in the course over the last few years, that
parents have actually been exonerated and released from prison after autopsies showed
that they could not possibly have injured their baby, but that there must have been
another cause of death.
Back to the Gardasil vaccine.
On May 18, 2016, the FDA held a meeting of the "Vaccines and Related Biological Products
Advisory Committee" (VRBPAC).
I found the summary document on FDA.gov, and at the bottom of page 13, I discovered some
important data.
The Gardasil vaccine appears to increase cancer risk by 44.6 percent in people who are already
carriers of the same HPV strains, which are 16 or 18, used in the vaccine.
In other words, it appears that if the vaccine is given to a young woman who already carries
HPV in a harmless state, it may activate the infection and directly cause precancerous
lesions to appear.
The vaccine, in other words, may accelerate the development of cancer.
This is exactly what happened to Erin Crawford.
TY: So, Erin, share with us if you could, a little bit about your experience when you
were at the University of Louisville.
ERIN CRAWFORD: Yeah.
I worked in a student health center and they approached me and said, "Hey, there's
this new vaccine that prevents cancer.
It'll stop you for getting cervical cancer.
Would you like that?"
And as one who had just buried three family members in about a year and a half prior to
that from cancer, I said, "Sure, whatever it takes."
And so, I just followed.
I got up from my desk and followed the nurse into the exam room and got a shot and went
back to work for the rest of the day, and probably some classes in through there, and
went back to my dorm that night.
Went to bed, woke up middle of the night that night vomiting.
And that continued for a few days and then extreme fatigue, muscle pain.
My limbs felt like they weighed a million pounds and that they were too heavy to move.
And it was just I couldn't get out of bed and then I had tonsillitis out of nowhere.
I never had tonsillitis before, which is where my tonsils swelled up and closed my airway
shut.
I had to go to the hospital.
And I think I was given a steroid injection and some antibiotics and all of this stuff.
And then couple of weeks later, it happened again.
And the vomiting and the tiredness and the fatigue, it just never stopped after that
point.
TY: And so, then this was directly immediately after the vaccine?
ERIN CRAWFORD: It was within about 12 hours.
Yeah.
TY: So, it didn't stop and continued.
When you went to the physician what did they tell you what was causing this?
ERIN CRAWFORD: Ah, just some virus.
"You've just got some virus, you know."
No connection to the fact that I had just some viruses injected unto me.
TY: Did you let them know that you just been injected with the vaccine?
ERIN CRAWFORD: They asked if there anything different?
And I said, "No, well I got this shot.
"Oh, that's not it.
That's not it."
TY: Okay.
They just kind of blew it off?
ERIN CRAWFORD: Yeah.
Completely blew it off.
About six months later my menstrual cycle completely stopped.
And I knew I wasn't pregnant, and so I went for some tests and I found out that I had
neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix, Stage 3.
So, Stage 3 cervical cancer.
TY: And that's the disease that the vaccine's supposed to prevent.
ERIN CRAWFORD: That's the disease the vaccine is supposed to prevent.
My tonsils would swell.
I mean you could see them out here.
The lymph nodes at the back of my head were swollen.
Look like I just, like some sort of dinosaur bumps at the back of my head.
And so, it definitely—whatever was going on was affecting my lymph system.
I just continued being sick, being sick, being sick.
And finally, the tonsillitis, at one point got so bad, I went crying—I mean, I was
just a mess and in the emergency room and they brought in an ear, nose, throat doctor
and he took one look and he said "These need to be removed now."
I ended up having an emergency tonsillectomy, which I did at that time request that the
tonsils be saved.
And so, saved and sent to a pathologist, which is where they tested positive for the three
strains of HPV that are in Gardasil.
When I had the last part of my cervix removed, I saved that, just like I did with my tonsils,
and had it tested and it tested positive for HPV16 and 18, which I had actually tested
negative to prior to getting the vaccine.
And HPV 16 and 18 are in the vaccine.
I don't know how you can deny that—
TY: There's no other way you got that except through the vaccine.
ERIN CRAWFORD: Right.
Yeah.
I couldn't get out of bed.
I almost failed out of school and almost lost my job just because I couldn't make it to
class.
Walking to class—and U of L campus isn't that big.
But, walking to class, I would just get sick.
I can't tell you how many times I threw up walking across the campus.
You know, it was embarrassing.
It just continued, just the overall sickness, fatigue.
And then when at this point I was going in every 3 months to my OB-GYN for check-ups.
Tested positive again.
TY: Okay.
ERIN CRAWFORD: At this point, the rest of my cervix was removed and I was told that
I wouldn't have children or I wouldn't be able to carry a child.
They said, "You might be able to get pregnant but carrying it without a cervix is very questionable."
TY: So, where were you at emotionally at that point, were you—?
ERIN CRAWFORD: I was devastated.
I've always wanted to be a mom.
And not when, you know, when I'm twenty, but you know I wanted that one day.
I wanted a family one day.
Then probably four or five months later, without even having a cervix, I tested positive again.
And it was at this point that, and they said, "Okay, we've got to do radiation, we've
got to do chemo, we've got to do this."
And the one thing I did learn from when my family members had cancer was that they went
downhill fast with radiation and chemo.
They didn't get better.
TY: So, you didn't want that.
ERIN CRAWFORD: I didn't want that.
And at this point, I'd been following everything the doctors had said.
And at this point, I was only getting sicker.
TY: Right.
ERIN CRAWFORD: So, I said, "No more."
And my oncologist looked at me and said, "You will die."
TY: Really?
ERIN CRAWFORD: Yeah.
TY: If you don't get these treatments, you will die.
ERIN CRAWFORD: Yeah. And I said, "So be it.
If that's the plan, then I guess that's the plan."
And I left.
That was a very hard time.
My family wasn't very understanding.
I come from like a very conventional family, "You do what the doctors say."
You know.
And, so, I didn't really have a support system.
So, I just started studying.
And started researching and studying and researching.
And I came across the Gerson protocol, and I did my own version of that.
I'm not going to say I did it exactly how it's set up to do.
I did a 42-day juice fast.
I started doing the coffee enemas, the infrared saunas, float tanks, Methyl B12 injections.
And I started feeling better, I started feeling better, I started feeling better.
And six months later, I went back to the OB-GYN for tests and I tested negative for cervical
cancer.
TY: Wow, I'll bet that was a great feeling?
ERIN CRAWFORD: That was the best feeling in the world!
All of this started right at 11 years ago.
Well, I got the Gardasil 11 years ago.
Got the first diagnosis 10 years ago, and I'm going on almost 9 years' cancer-free
now.
TY: Oh, that's awesome.
ERIN CRAWFORD: Yeah.
TY: Congratulations.
ERIN CRAWFORD: Thank you. I appreciate it.
TY: What a powerful story.
I'm happy to tell you that Erin is doing really well today.
DR. MERCOLA: Their intention is to use this for the greater good, is their working philosophical
premise.
That it's okay to have a few people die and suffer, because most people are going
to be protected.
I guess if that were true, you could question the justification for that.
It may be potentially justifiable, but the problem is, it's not true.
Because it isn't for the greater good.
They don't have any screening systems in place to identify all the damaged individuals.
When we look at it and carefully examine objectively the number of individuals who are damaged,
it far exceeds any potential benefit that they're possibly imagining from receiving
these vaccines.
There are some terrible ones.
Like Hepatitis B vaccines and Gardasil vaccines.
They're just destroying so many people, girls and young children.
It's devastating.
SAYER JI: Unless we also truly become aware of what's going on and the intrinsic, just
disease-promoting properties of vaccines, we will never be able to have a world that's
truly safe for our children.
TY: Regardless of your position on vaccines, I think we can all agree with Sayer Ji, we
all want to have is a world that's safe for our children.
JEFFEREY JAXEN: I've been covering globally the HPV vaccine.
And the interesting aspect of the HPV vaccine is with children and infants that are injured,
the infant or the child can't talk and tell people, "I felt great until I had my vaccine."
The daughters are doing that because they were 12 and 13.
They said, "I was fine and then I collapsed after the vaccine."
So not only do you have the parents and the medical records and the doctors saying it
was a vaccine, but you actually have the vaccine-injured coming forward and telling their stories.
So, this is a story that's repeating, unfortunately, globally.
Colombia, France, Italy, Greece, Denmark, Japan, on and on and on.
It's the same story.
And each culture is handling that story differently, but every one of them is pushing back.
There's a little different flavor in each culture and that has to do, I believe, with
their lineage and the DNA memory of that cultures revolting spirit.
I have to say in Ireland they're kicking some major butt.
When I talk to each of these families, sometimes through Google Translate translating their
words, I talked to the Irish mothers and there's a lot of profanity that comes out of their
mouth.
They're fiery and they've actually gotten the mainstream media to cover it.
They're keeping it bouncing on the mainstream media's radar and they won't let it go.
It's a harder pushback.
So, it's fascinating to see that.
So, I do see that.
The second thing I'm seeing is, as a journalist, I usually stay in the background a little
bit.
People that are seeing me here are coming up to me and telling me things.
I've had a thought for a very long time.
In Compton, Sheila Ealey was the first person to start talking about this that I've seen.
What she said was this idea of medical civil disobedience in America.
This is where we are at right now.
I believe this is the answer.
As a journalist, I've researched the civil rights movement.
I've researched the fall of the Soviet Union intimately and how it happened.
For the first time in history, we're going to witness—we are witnessing now, but we're
going to witness it very rapidly in mainstream media, medical civil disobedience on a wide
scale.
Civil disobedience by nature is to oppose a morally unjust law or a government or a
vaccine mandate.
The civil rights movement was bubbling underneath the surface for a very, very long time.
A very long time.
Around the time of—you had Malcom X, you had Martin Luther King, you had the Vietnam
War.
You had all these things coming together.
That's when it hit the streets.
That's when a million-man match.
So, I'm seeing those same factors happening right now against pharmaceutical companies
in the vaccine push.
What I'm hearing from doctors, they're telling me about their medical civil disobedience
without labeling it that.
That word "civil disobedience" has been lost from our vocabulary.
People forgot that spirit.
For example, a pediatrician came up to me and said off the record, now it's on record
but I'm not going to say his name, "We have more oranges in our office that have
shots in them than we have children."
I have many nurses saying, "We have an entire ward of nurses that all get together and we
have our head physician sign off that we all had the flu shot."
And what I'm seeing there is a parallel.
That's the American constitution.
That's a bunch of people getting together knowing what they're up against and saying
instead of going up against this singly, we're all going to sign a piece of paper and hang
together if this goes down.
MICHAEL HUGO: The medical establishment has got to stop trying to protect the manufacturers.
It starts with a free pen.
Nowadays it's a free iPad when you're in medical school, and the next thing you
know you've sold your soul to the devil.
They've got to stop doing that.
That system has to stop allowing that to happen.
TY: I hope you've enjoyed this episode and hope you learned a lot.
Please tell your friends and family about this and join us for the next episode.
Thanks, and God bless you.
Join the movement, support the mission, save lives.
We're a small company that's dedicated to the truth and dedicated to helping humanity.
When you support our mission by owning the complete series today, it allows us to continue
to research, interview, expose and share the truth absolutely free, just like we're doing
right now.
If you've learned something today, if you've been inspired, if you want to help save lives,
or you just love how it makes you feel when you donate to a worthy cause, then please
consider owning "The Truth About Vaccines" today.
As always, a portion of each sale is donated to charities that are doing real research
to help our children be healthier and safer.
Simply click the banner below to join the movement and support the mission. Thanks in advance.
For more infomation >> Police: Man arrested for string of robberies in metro connected with gun-store heist - Duration: 1:14. 
For more infomation >> Funeral Arrangements For Deputy Heath Gumm Announced - Duration: 0:25. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét