Frankly, if he doesn't obtain nuclear weapons, his regime is in danger.
It is danger, not only from a revolt from his people, but more likely from a revolt
from the army which are still determined to see North Korea rise.
And their one way of doing that is through the obtaining of a nuclear arsenal.
The most logical response for me in regards to Kim Jong-un is the fact that he looks at
the last two despots who gave up their weapons of mass destruction, that would be Libya and
Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
And the consequences for them was they were both killed by Western forces.
It's very logical to believe that if he doesn't obtain nuclear weapons, his hand is incredibly
weakened, and as I said, either by his own generals or the prospect of an attack by the
United States.
As we have seen on numerous occasions over the course of the last six months, President
Trump has had no problem with implying that an invasion is not only likely, but in some
cases inevitable.
That contradicts the words of Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson.
But we'll talk about that in a second.
What I'm alluding to is that the concerns of Kim Jong-Un are
that without a nuclear strike force, without that deterrent, that his regime is under threat
from both domestic and international sources.
Therefore, in his opinion the attainment of nuclear weapons is a must.
In my opinion, it is likely to happen.
And I don't see any way, personally, that this is going to be able to be stopped.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét