Thứ Hai, 2 tháng 7, 2018

Waching daily Jul 2 2018

MICHELLE OBAMA.

WE GOT THE FORMER FIRST LADY

DOING THE ULTIMATE POWER LUNCH

AT THE ULTIMATE POWER LUNCH

LOCATION.

HARVEY: I LOVE THAT SHE WENT TO

SPAGO.

CHARLES: AND SHE WAS LUNCHING AT

SPAGO WITH KERRY WNBA.

HARVEY: THEY'RE FRIENDS.

MICHELLE SHOWED UP TO THE

"SCANDAL" SETS FROM TIME TO TIME

AND THE BIG SOMETHING THAT

MICHELLE AND BARACK OBAMA HAVE

SIGNED THIS DEAL WITH NETFLIX TO

PRODUCE CONTENT.

KERRY WASHINGTON IS NOW

AVAILABLE BECAUSE "SCANDAL" IS

OVER.

CHARLES: WE GOT A SHOT OF THE

FORMER FIRST LADY WALKING OUT.

SHE DIDN'T HAVE MUCH TO SAY.

SHE'S FLANKED BY SECRET SERVICE,

OF COURSE, BUT SHE WENT OUT THE

FRONT DOOR.

INTERESTINGLY, KERRY SNUCK OUT

THE BACK DOOR BUT WE GOT HER

THERE AND ASKED HER WHAT WAS

GOING ON AT THIS LUNCH.

WAS IT A DEAL?

>> HEY, KERRY.

>> HI.

>> ARE YOU GUYS WORKING ON A NET

FLICKS PROJECT TOGETHER?

>> OH, HOW ARE YOU TODAY?

>> I GOT TO ASK, WHO PAID?

>> HAVE A GOOD DAY.

>> WHO PICKED UP THE BILL?

WAS IT YOU?

CHARLES: HAVE A GOOD DAY.

YES, WE MADE A DEAL AND WE CAN'T

TALK ABOUT IT.

HARVEY: IT WAS MICHELLE OBAMA.

THIS WAS A BUSINESS DEAL.

>> THEY TOTALLY TALKED BUSINESS.

IT WAS HEY, I'M IN TOWN, I'M

MEETING WITH THE EXECUTIVES, I

WANT YOU TO BE A PART OF THIS.

THERE'S ALL IT WAS.

HARVEY: WILL YOU REPLAY THAT?

MAYBE ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE IS NOT

WITH SECURITY.

MAYBE ONE IS WITH A STUDIO AND

WE COULD TELL --

CHARLES: YOU THOUGHT YOU MIGHT

RECOGNIZE THEM?

HARVEY: NO, BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS

A GOOD GAME.

THIS IS THEM NOT MAKING A DEAL

AND NOT PRODUCING.

CHARLES: THEY'RE TRYING TO GET

STUFF OFF THE GROUND.

HARVEY: AND KERRY WASHINGTON

MAKES A WHOLE LOT OF SENSE ON A

BUNCH OF LEVELS.

SHE IS GRADE-A, AVAILABLE, AND

THEY'RE TIGHT.

IT MAKES A LOT SENSE.

CALLER: HI, I APPLAUD THE SPIRIT

OF VOLUNTEERISM, THE COMMUNITIES

SERVICE AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE

THAT THE OBAHAMAS HAVE EXUDED.

I CAN'T THINK OF A BETTER

REPRESENTATIVE THAN TO USE

MICHELLE OBAMA WITH HER

ANNOUNCEMENT STANDING GRACE AND

CLASS AND ARE THEABILITY THAT

SHE EXULEDS.

I THINK SHE'S AN EXCELLENT

CHOICE AND ALSO KERRY WASHINGTON

ON OUR TV WITH NETFLIX AS THE

SOUNDING BOARD FOR THAT,

PRODUCING THE FILMS AND TV

SERIES.

IMAGE THAT'S AN EXCELLENT

CHOICE.

HARVEY: YEP.

REAL QUICK, ON SCANDAL, BOTH

TONY GOLD WIN AND HIS WIFE WERE

PRESIDENT ON "HOUSE OF

QUARLEDSKFMENTS ON HOUSE OF

CARDS, BOTH ROBIN WRIGHT AND

KEVIN SPACEY WERE PRESIDENT,

RIGHT?

IF MICHELLE OBAMA DECIDED SHE

WANTED TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT, SHE

WOULD ABSOLUTELY GET THE

NOMINATION.

I'M JUST SAYING THAT.

CHARLES: OK, GREAT POINT.

I DON'T DISAGREE.

HARVEY: SHE'S THE MOST

FORMIDABLE CANDIDATE.

CHARLES: BUT IT'S NOT HAPPENING.

HARVEY: NOT HAPPENING.

For more infomation >> Michelle Obama: This Is How I Do Lunch | TMZ Live - Duration: 3:50.

-------------------------------------------

There Is One Unverified File The FBI Refuses To Release Because Of Whose Name Is On It - Duration: 4:57.

For more infomation >> There Is One Unverified File The FBI Refuses To Release Because Of Whose Name Is On It - Duration: 4:57.

-------------------------------------------

Neymar: Brazil star is PATHETIC and a top-quality ACTOR - Martin O'Neill - Duration: 1:44.

Neymar scored one and assisted another as Brazil beat Mexico 2-0 in the World Cup last-16

However, it was his reaction to being trod on that angered Martin O'Neill, who was working as a pundit for ITV

Mexico defender Miguel Layun stood on Neymar's ankle when the forward was lying on the floor

Neymar writhed around the floor in agony but managed to get up and complete the game

And O'Neill believes his reaction was far too over the top."It's pathetic. It's absolutely pathetic

Honestly," the Republic of Ireland boss said."It's a red card nowadays because they've spotted somebody stand on his foot, but the pain threshold of Neymar is just incredibly low I must admit

"I wouldn't like to see him coming out of the doctor's surgery after getting a flu injection

He's a top-quality player and he's a top-quality actor."He hasn't really hit it yet (at the tournament) and part of our thinking is exactly to do with all of this play-acting

"He's been down dozens and dozens of times, he gets up again."He's played all four games and hasn't done too badly out of it

"

For more infomation >> Neymar: Brazil star is PATHETIC and a top-quality ACTOR - Martin O'Neill - Duration: 1:44.

-------------------------------------------

Why Twitter is the most underrated social network - Duration: 3:55.

what's going on guys welcome back Matt Doddato here and today I want to talk

about a social network that I feel like is the most underrated out of all the

ones out there Twitter when you hear people talk about the favorite social

networks you're gonna hear a bunch of them named YouTube Instagram snapchat

maybe even Facebook maybe not Facebook it's my mom's favorite for sure rarely

we ever hear anyone ever say put it why is that but it seems like any time

people actually do talk about Twitter they're talking about what they don't

like about it it's overwhelming there's too much content there's too many fake

accounts from marketers the return and engagement on Twitter is extremely low

and not even close to their competition so for influencers the monetization

opportunities on Twitter are way lower than they are another social network so

all those things add up two reasons why people don't really engage with I use

Twitter as much there's definitely areas where it can't really compete with its

counterparts and when you look at the monthly active user numbers you can tell

there's a big discrepancy you have Facebook with 2.2 billion active users

per month you have YouTube now with 1.9 billion have Instagram with a billion

then when you bring up Twitter you're talking about around 330 million active

users on a monthly basis which is way lower than some of the others it's about

around where snapchat is so why do I think Twitter is so underrated I think

it's really about understanding what Twitter is good for and what it does

really well and being able to target that specifically so that you get the

value that you need out of it so here are some reasons that Twitter is really

great why I think it's the most underrated social network one it's great

for up to the second news I seriously use that every day and that's why

Twitter is probably the most used app on my phone

not only is Twitter great for up to the second news is great for targeted

content because you have the ability to curate your timeline and your feed plus

you can use the list feature to be able to break down specific topics that

you're interested in a see personal feed specifically related to those topics is

a great tool to be able to get in the information that you want in the way

that you want it without being completely overwhelming I just want to

touch on lists for a second I use lists a lot as it helps to target my viewing

depending on my mood or what I'm looking for in the moment even though I follow a

lot of different folks on my main timeline I'll target specific content on

a specific list so that way I can target my viewing and not be totally

overwhelmed by everything that's on my timeline great example of this is during

sports NFL Draft time during the NBA free agency if I want to know

specifically what the Spurs are doing or the news or

the Spurs and I have a list for that and it helps me be able to drown out the

noise and focus on what I really want up to the second because Twitter is

primarily about receiving content what it offers you is a great opportunity to

be able to build a reputation in your niche people who are interested in

building their own personal brand within a niche you have an opportunity with

Twitter to push out content consistently all throughout the day and be able to

use hashtags and other tactics to be able to reach an audience and because

Twitter is about content creation and people are creating personalized list

depending on the topics they like it's easier to be able to gain that traction

than some other social networks because the expectation on Twitter is people

want information that happens to meet their interests and lastly not only is

Twitter great and building your reputation in a niche it's great at

providing you the opportunity to interact with people that are important

in your area of interest there's a lot of times the barrier to communication of

important people in your niche is a lot lower so it's easy to reach out to

someone and a lot of times get a response back when you have a targeted

question when you want to interact with dialog is something important that's

going on so the ability to reach people is great

and being able to use tactics like replies hashtags mentions all provide

the opportunity to have that back-and-forth dialogue that maybe

doesn't exist in other social networks so those are reasons why I think

Twitter's an underrated social network right now as long as you're able to

target and personalize your experience what's really interested in it's not as

overwhelming as it seems just like any other platform you're gonna get whatever

you put into it sometimes Twitter can seem like this never-ending stream of

information but if you personalize your experience and you target content that's

curated to your interest you can really get a lot out of it and get a level of

engagement that just doesn't exist on some other platforms that's all I have

for you guys today if you like this video tap that like button down below

if you haven't yet join the family by hitting that subscribe button cuz these

are matters of life tech and I'll see y'all next time

Peace!

For more infomation >> Why Twitter is the most underrated social network - Duration: 3:55.

-------------------------------------------

World UFO Day: Are we really alone? The question is worthy of serious study - Duration: 18:13.

 This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Space

com's Expert Voices: Op-Ed  Are we alone? Unfortunately, neither of the answers feel satisfactory

To be alone in this vast universe is a lonely prospect. On the other hand, if we are not alone and there is someone or something more powerful out there, that too is terrifying

 As a NASA research scientist and now a professor of physics, I attended the 2002 NASA Contact Conference, which focused on serious speculation about extraterrestrials

During the meeting a concerned participant said loudly in a sinister tone, "You have absolutely no idea what is out there!" The silence was palpable as the truth of this statement sunk in

Humans are fearful of extraterrestrials visiting Earth. Perhaps fortunately, the distances between the stars are prohibitively vast

At least this is what we novices, who are just learning to travel into space, tell ourselves

 I have always been interested in UFOs. Of course, there was the excitement that there could be aliens and other living worlds

But more exciting to me was the possibility that interstellar travel was technologically achievable

In 1988, during my second week of graduate school at Montana State University, several students and I were discussing a recent cattle mutilation that was associated with UFOs

A physics professor joined the conversation and told us that he had colleagues working at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Great Falls, Montana, where they were having problems with UFOs shutting down nuclear missiles

At the time I thought this professor was talking nonsense. But 20 years later, I was stunned to see a recording of a press conference featuring several former US Air Force personnel, with a couple from Malmstrom AFB, describing similar occurrences in the 1960s

Clearly there must be something to this.  With July 2 being World UFO Day, it is a good time for society to address the unsettling and refreshing fact we may not be alone

I believe we need to face the possibility that some of the strange flying objects that outperform the best aircraft in our inventory and defy explanation may indeed be visitors from afar – and there's plenty of evidence to support UFO sightings

The Fermi paradox  The nuclear physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for posing thought provoking questions

In 1950, at Los Alamos National Laboratory after discussing UFOs over lunch, Fermi asked, "Where is everybody?" He estimated there were about 300 billion stars in the galaxy, many of them billions of years older than the sun, with a large percentage of them likely to host habitable planets

Even if intelligent life developed on a very small percentage of these planets, then there should be a number of intelligent civilizations in the galaxy

Depending on the assumptions, one should expect anywhere from tens to tens of thousands of civilizations

 With the rocket-based technologies that we have developed for space travel, it would take between 5 and 50 million years for a civilization like ours to colonize our Milky Way galaxy

Since this should have happened several times already in the history of our galaxy, one should wonder where is the evidence of these civilizations? This discrepancy between the expectation that there should be evidence of alien civilizations or visitations and the presumption that no visitations have been observed has been dubbed the Fermi Paradox

 Carl Sagan correctly summarized the situation by saying that "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence

" The problem is that there has been no single well-documented UFO encounter that would alone qualify as the smoking gun

The situation is exacerbated by the fact that many governments around the world have covered up and classified information about such encounters

But there are enough scraps of evidence that suggest that the problem needs to be open to scientific study

UFOs, taboo for professional scientists  When it comes to science, the scientific method requires hypotheses to be testable so that inferences can be verified

UFO encounters are neither controllable nor repeatable, which makes their study extremely challenging

But the real problem, in my view, is that the UFO topic is taboo.  While the general public has been fascinated with UFOs for decades, our governments, scientists and media, have essentially declared that of all the UFO sightings are a result of weather phenomenon or human actions

None are actually extraterrestrial spacecraft. And no aliens have visited Earth. Essentially, we are told that the topic is nonsense

UFOs are off-limits to serious scientific study and rational discussion, which unfortunately leaves the topic in the domain of fringe and pseudoscientists, many of whom litter the field with conspiracy theories and wild speculation

 I think UFO skepticism has become something of a religion with an agenda, discounting the possibility of extraterrestrials without scientific evidence, while often providing silly hypotheses describing only one or two aspects of a UFO encounter reinforcing the popular belief that there is a conspiracy

A scientist must consider all of the possible hypotheses that explain all of the data, and since little is known, the extraterrestrial hypothesis cannot yet be ruled out

In the end, the skeptics often do science a disservice by providing a poor example of how science is to be conducted

The fact is that many of these encounters – still a very small percentage of the total – defy conventional explanation

 The media amplifies the skepticism by publishing information about UFOs when it is exciting, but always with a mocking or whimsical tone and reassuring the public that it can't possibly be true

But there are credible witnesses and encounters. Why don't astronomers see UFOs?  I am often asked by friends and colleagues, "Why don't astronomers see UFOs?" The fact is that they do

In 1977, Peter Sturrock, a professor of space science and astrophysics at Stanford University, mailed 2,611 questionnaires about UFO sightings to members of the American Astronomical Society

He received 1,356 responses from which 62 astronomers – 4.6 percent – reported witnessing or recording inexplicable aerial phenomena

This rate is similar to the approximately 5 percent of UFO sightings that are never explained

 As expected, Sturrock found that astronomers who witnessed UFOs were more likely to be night sky observers

Over 80 percent of Sturrock's respondents were willing to study the UFO phenomenon if there was a way to do so

More than half of them felt that the topic deserves to be studied versus 20 percent who felt that it should not

The survey also revealed that younger scientists were more likely to support the study of UFOs

 UFOs have been observed through telescopes. I know of one telescope sighting by an experienced amateur astronomer in which he observed an object shaped like a guitar pick moving through the telescope's field of view

Further sightings are documented in the book "Wonders in the Sky," in which the authors compile numerous observations of unexplained aerial phenomena made by astronomers and published in scientific journals throughout the 1700s and 1800s

Evidence from government and military officers  Some of the most convincing observations have come from government officials

In 1997, the Chilean government formed the organization Comité de Estudios de Fenómenos Aéreos Anómalos, or CEFAA, to study UFOs

Last year, CEFAA released footage of a UFO taken with a helicopter-mounted Wescam infrared camera

 The countries of Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Ecuador, France, New Zealand, Russia, Sweden and the United Kingdom have been declassifying their UFO files since 2008

The French Committee for In-Depth Studies, or COMETA, was an unofficial UFO study group comprised of high-ranking scientists and military officials that studied UFOs in the late 1990s

They released the COMETA Report, which summarized their findings. They concluded that 5 percent of the encounters were reliable yet inexplicable: The best hypothesis available was that the observed craft were extraterrestrial

They also accused the United States of covering up evidence of UFOs. Iran has been concerned about spherical UFOs observed near nuclear power facilities that they call "CIA drones" which reportedly are about 30 feet in diameter, can achieve speeds up to Mach 10, and can leave the atmosphere

Such speeds are on par with the fastest experimental aircraft, but unthinkable for a sphere without lift surfaces or an obvious propulsion mechanism

 In December 2017, The New York Times broke a story about the classified Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program, which was a $22 million program run by the former Pentagon official Luis Elizondo and aimed at studying UFOs

Elizondo resigned from running the program protesting extreme secrecy and the lack of funding and support

Following his resignation Elizondo, along with several others from the defense and intelligence community, were recruited by the To the Stars Academy of Arts & Science, which was recently founded by Tom DeLonge to study UFOs and interstellar travel

In conjunction with the launch of the academy, the Pentagon declassified and released three videos of UFO encounters taken with forward looking infrared cameras mounted on F-18 fighter jets

While there is much excitement about such disclosures, I am reminded of a quote from Retired Army Colonel John Alexander: "Disclosure has happened

… I've got stacks of generals, including Soviet generals, who've come out and said UFOs are real

My point is, how many times do senior officials need to come forward and say that this is real?" A topic worthy of serious study  There is a great deal of evidence that a small percentage of these UFO sightings are unidentified structured craft exhibiting flight capabilities beyond any known human technology

While there is no single case for which there exists evidence that would stand up to scientific rigor, there are cases with simultaneous observations by multiple reliable witnesses, along with radar returns and photographic evidence revealing patterns of activity that are compelling

 Declassified information from covert studies is interesting, but not scientifically helpful

This is a topic worthy of open scientific inquiry, until there is a scientific consensus based on evidence rather than prior expectation or belief

If there are indeed extraterrestrial craft visiting Earth, it would greatly benefit us to know about them, their nature and their intent

Moreover, this would present a great opportunity for mankind, promising to expand and advance our knowledge and technology, as well as reshaping our understanding of our place in the universe

 Kevin Knuth, Associate Professor of Physics, University at Albany, State University of New York  This article was originally published on The Conversation

Read the original article. Follow all of the Expert Voices issues and debates — and become part of the discussion — on Facebook, Twitter and Google +

The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher

This version of the article was originally published on Space.com.

For more infomation >> World UFO Day: Are we really alone? The question is worthy of serious study - Duration: 18:13.

-------------------------------------------

Rurouni kenshin - This is your life - Duration: 4:13.

For more infomation >> Rurouni kenshin - This is your life - Duration: 4:13.

-------------------------------------------

Neymar: Brazil star is PATHETIC and a top-quality ACTOR - Martin O'Neill - Duration: 1:53.

 Neymar scored one and assisted another as Brazil beat Mexico 2-0 in the World Cup last-16

 However, it was his reaction to being trod on that angered Martin O'Neill, who was working as a pundit for

 Mexico defender Miguel Layun stood on Neymar's ankle when the forward was lying on the floor

 Neymar writhed around the floor in agony but managed to get up and complete the game

 And O'Neill believes his reaction was far too over the top. "It's pathetic. It's absolutely pathetic

Honestly," the Republic of Ireland boss said. "It's a red card nowadays because they've spotted somebody stand on his foot, but the pain threshold of Neymar is just incredibly low I must admit

 "I wouldn't like to see him coming out of the doctor's surgery after getting a flu injection

 "He's a top-quality player and he's a top-quality actor. "He hasn't really hit it yet (at the tournament) and part of our thinking is exactly to do with all of this play-acting

 "He's been down dozens and dozens of times, he gets up again. "He's played all four games and hasn't done too badly out of it

"

For more infomation >> Neymar: Brazil star is PATHETIC and a top-quality ACTOR - Martin O'Neill - Duration: 1:53.

-------------------------------------------

JIMMY'S TAKE ' LeBron James is gone, but left lasting memories - Duration: 2:25.

For more infomation >> JIMMY'S TAKE ' LeBron James is gone, but left lasting memories - Duration: 2:25.

-------------------------------------------

Medicare Is Changing for Many Minnesotans - Cost Plan Sunsetting - Duration: 4:20.

Medicare is the health insurance program

for people age 65 and over and for

disabled people. What you may not know is

that for about half of the people on

Medicare in Minnesota, Medicare will be

changing and it could affect the

Medicare coverage you have right now. Due

to changes in federal law Medicare Cost

Plans, a type of Medicare plan that is

very popular in Minnesota, will be going

away in most of the state. This means

that many Minnesotans on Medicare will

need to choose a new plan during

Medicare open enrollment this fall.

But don't worry, there will be lots of plans

to choose from for those who need to

make a change. So please, let me walk you

through the steps you'll need to take if

you're one of those affected.

In September, Medicare plans and the

Medicare Administration will send

letters to those who currently have a

Cost Plan to let them know that their

plan is ending. If you receive these

letters you'll want to review all your

options to make sure that you enroll in

a new plan that meets your needs.

Maybe you'll choose to sign up for a new

plan, with the same insurance company

you have now. Or maybe you'll want to

return to Original Medicare and purchase

a Medicare Supplement policy and a

separate Medicare Part D plan. Or maybe

you'll want to enroll in a new plan from

a new insurance company. It's all up to

you. But you'll want to make sure that

your provider participates in the new

plan, your prescription drugs are covered

by the new plan, your pharmacy

participates with the new plan, and that

you can afford the premium. If you don't

know if you currently have a Cost Plan

please call your health plan to find out.

Now let's go over some options you can

choose to make sure you have Medicare

coverage for 2019. Option 1, for some of

you on a Cost Plan you may not have to

do anything to change plans, that's

because some of you will automatically

be enrolled in a new plan by your

current insurance company.

This is called deeming and the letter you

receive from your current insurance

company will tell you if you have been

deemed into a new plan. You can choose to

stay in this plan, or you can enroll in

something else if you choose too.

Option 2, if you are not deemed, you will need

to either enroll in a Medicare Advantage

plan or purchase a Medicare supplement

policy and a separate Medicare Part D plan.

All Medicare Advantage plan options for 2019

can be found on the Medicare Plan Finder tool

on Medicare.gov starting on October 1st.

Option 3, if you instead want to

purchase a Medicare supplemental policy,

you can compare policies on the Medicare

Plan Finder tool, but you have to go

through a company agent or broker to

purchase this type of policy.

Option 4, if you do nothing, and are not deemed, you

will return to Original Medicare on

January 1st 2019, and will not have any

other coverage. This means you'll have to

pay all Medicare co-pays and deductibles.

While it's great to have all of these

options, it can be confusing!

Fortunately, free, unbiased help is

available by calling the Senior LinkAge Line

at 1-800-333-2433.

The Senior LinkAge Line is a service of the

Minnesota Board on Aging in partnership

with Minnesota's Area Agencies on Aging.

They do not sell, or market any insurance

product, they simply provide neutral,

objective and comprehensive information.

Give them a call

8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through

Friday at 1-800-333-2433

and get the answers and

the help you need.

[Music]

you

[Music]

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét