Waching daily Apr 4 2018

Hi I'm Natasha with BareTalk TV, and today we're talking about social media

and social media etiquette: unfollowing, following, blocking.

Oh my god, blocking, what does this all mean? Because I use social media a lot but when it

comes to all of these things I'm a little bit of like: "oh I don't know, is

this the right thing to do?!" - Right, it means something, right? I'm gonna be

honest I don't do this professionally okay, just gotta throw that up there no I

professionally. If someone bothers me that I work with in the industry most of

the time I will I'll just kind of leave you all my social media, whatever.

But if you were a friend, or a boyfriend, or an ex-boyfriend that has done me

wrong, you will know I'm pissed at you, because you are going to get unfollowed.

And all the ex-boyfriends are gonna get blocked. Maybe not forever, but at least

for when I'm very very pissed at you - Actually, that reminds me of something.

So when I ended or when I had a relationship that ended and I noticed

all the sudden that this person that I'd been with for like if a number of years,

and all of a sudden stopped following me on like everything and I was like "but

why? Like I thought we were still, cool I thought we were still friends." And

people were like, "because he doesn't want to see you all the time, and you're

always on social media." Like "oh cuz like I didn't think to unfollow him, but then

I was like, "well, fuck you! I'm gonna unfollow you you too!" Blocked to! - Yeah so it was for me it

was a retaliation thing, but totally I didn't get it. It is and I do that

too because especially for the boyfriend thing if I'm like, "I don't want to see, I

don't want to unexpectedly have you pop up, I don't want to message you right

after some whining Wednesday's you know. - Whining Tuesdays, Whining Thursday. - yeah I don't want to

be messaging you, so I put them on block. I have a lot of ex-boyfriends that are now

acquaintances or like friends now and if they're all my social media it doesn't

bother me anymore . I've re added them, I have blocked them though but I have

ew added them, and it's fine! But like yeah if it's a very current relationship,

you're done. Also I had I had a friend, I was friends with

her for years and years and years we I was always trying to work to save the

friendship, after a while it was just kind of going downhill, I realized, you

know, it was not good anymore and when I once I realized that, you know, our

friendship was over, I deleted her, I didn't block or anything but I

was just like, again it's still painful for me so I got

rid of her on everything, if she on my stuff now I probably wouldn't care. - Well I've

done it out of loyalty. So like, I've had a friend who had an

issue with a friend of hers, who I actually didn't know that well and she

was like, "I've blocked this person, you need to block them too." And I was like "cool

fine, like I don't have an issue, but like out of loyalty to you because you're my

sister, I'm gonna do this." But like I'm it very rarely will I like unfollow or

block someone, except for, so my Facebook I have a lot of people who I don't

necessarily know, where I've never met them, and sometimes I'll have people who

just put like the rudest comments and I don't know if they realize how rude

they're being. I feel like this is just how they go through life just saying

things like that so I have blocked a couple people because I'm like, "you know,

you're kind of crossing a line, we've never met before, and it's not

appropriate for you to comment those things." So for me though, that's my line.

That's your line. - That's my line - I'm the personal, you're the "you

just piss me off, sorry so I'm done with you. - I'm never gonna piss you off

because I like having you in my followers. - I know, I love seeing

your cat sanctuaries and stuff like that. - We won't be blocking each other

anytime soon. It's not gonna happen. - Cheers to this,

you look fabulous. - As do you. - Thank you

For more infomation >> Whining Wednesday! When is it Appropriate to Unfollow?? - Duration: 3:24.

-------------------------------------------

What is the Percentage Completion Method and how does it work? - Duration: 5:00.

Hi, my name is Tatiana Glebkivska and I'm a member of client accounting services team

at Macpage. At Macpage we provide full accounting and business consulting

services, and my team of concentrates on providing accounting outsourcing and

controllership services to clients. Today I would like to talk about

percentage completion method, also I hear it called a lot from construction guys:

Work In Progress calculation or WIP. So why is it important?

Usually the percentage completion method arises in construction companies that

are on accrual basis; and the reason for that is that, in accrual accounting

revenue can be reported when the services or goods are completed or received,

and the payment can be estimated. (Or sometimes they call it realized).

In construction companies the question is a little bit different,

Let's say you have a $10 million project with a town to build a bridge, and in that project

the town will pay you quarterly: $250,000, regardless how you perform your job.

So the question is, let's say you start a new job,

and then the weather was terrible, six months went by, and the crew

managed to be on the job only for two weeks. However, the city already paid you $500,000.

Which part of it can be recorded? because as we already discussed,

in accrual accounting, revenue can be recorded when the services are completed.

So, how do we figure out which part of this $500,000 was completed?

So here is where the percentage of completion methods comes in

And this method is very easy. What you do is you calculate

your actual cost and that's usually known and you know your estimated cost,

because when you were bidding for the project your engineers calculated

how much it's gonna cost. So let's say in our example, for $10 million bridge

we estimate $5 million in expenses. And now, for the first six months, you

incurred $100,000 in costs but you received $500,000.

The Percentage of Completion Method, what it does; you divide the actual cost by total estimated cost.

So in this situation we have $100,000 cost divided by $5,000,000 total cost.

Which gives us 2%. So this means that two percent of the job is completed,

then we multiply this two percent by the total revenue,

which is $10,000,000; and what do we get? We get $200,000.

It means out of this $500,000, the revenue

that can and must be recorded is only $200,000.

The rest, $300,000, is a liability. Meaning we owe to perform that services to the client.

The situation can be the opposite; let's say the weather was fantastic and

we performed the services of $400,000. In this case,

I believe $400,000 divided by $5,000,000, gives us 8%.

So 8% times $10,000,000 estimated revenue;

We should recognize $800,000 revenue, but we only received $500,000.

So why this is important, this can either make or break your

financial statements, your income statement especially, because your

revenue will be either overstated or understated if it's not properly calculated.

What I want to stress and say, when you talk to your

accountant and you see those work in progress calculation spreadsheets,

they look gigantic and scary, and they have a lot of logical

functions like 'if' and 'then' and you look and you're like, 'what is it?'

But in reality, after all that 'if' and 'then' is done, all it does is you divide your actual

revenue by actual cost by estimated cost that gives you the percentage completed.

Then, by knowing that percentage, you arrive to your revenue.

That's all it does in the simple terms; so there is no need to be scared for it.

However, it's important somebody who's competent prepares those for you,

because investors look at your revenue, and they want to know how it was calculated.

And then based on that, you can either get your financing or you can get denied.

The other thing is for tax purposes; people use work in progress calculation as well;

and it is important to have your revenue properly stated so

then you have a good income and then based on that you can pay your taxes or obtain financing.

For more infomation >> What is the Percentage Completion Method and how does it work? - Duration: 5:00.

-------------------------------------------

What is an Ottawa Gee Gee? - Duration: 1:18.

Oh that's really dumb.

Hey guys, what's up.

I'm Mike DeBoer and today we're asking Western students what's an Ottawa Gee Gee.

So would either of you guys have any idea what a Gee Gee would be?

Nope

Aha no

No

Um, gossip girl

No

No

Yeah thats Ottawa's team right?

Yeah correct, but do you know what it stands for?

My brother used to play for that team and he's explained it and

I'm like "It's fucking stupid" but I don't know what it is

No clue

Good game

Good game homie

Ok, well that's a good guess, and that is kinda what it means, but not in this context.

Do you know who the Mustangs are playing on Saturday for the Homecoming football game?

No

Did you know that we had a football team?

Yes

Are either of you guys planning on going to the game?

I thought about it for maybe two minutes

No

Uhm, I might have to pass

Ok, so you're not going to be seeing these two at the game, but thanks for the interview boys

For more infomation >> What is an Ottawa Gee Gee? - Duration: 1:18.

-------------------------------------------

Why ACHAP leader scare only Aiden baby?|Aiden baby is perfect son of him in future|Monkey Daily 542 - Duration: 12:51.

For more infomation >> Why ACHAP leader scare only Aiden baby?|Aiden baby is perfect son of him in future|Monkey Daily 542 - Duration: 12:51.

-------------------------------------------

The Tower of Terror is a Bad Twilight Zone Ride - Duration: 6:05.

The Tower of Terror is a beloved classic Disney attraction, and for good reason too.

Everything from the queue to the pre-show to the loading area to the ride itself is

wonderfully atmospheric.

It manages to blend tension and thrills in a way that leaves guests wanting more.

It is, without a doubt, a great ride.

However for as great of a ride as it is, it's an awful Twilight Zone ride.

To borrow those earlier words, Rod Serling's Twilight Zone series is also a beloved classic.

The sci-fi anthology from 1959 managed to tell stories that both brought us to bizarre

and alien settings while still imparting parables that were specifically about us as a society.

It tackled touchy subjects like the red scare and cultural prejudice

and at a time where the status quo for television was simple escapism.

That's The Twilight Zone at its peaks, but even at its valleys it was still often an

interesting character piece that toyed with our expectations when it came to storytelling.

So when I look at The Twilight Zone Tower of Terror, for as great of a ride as it is,

I can't help but feel bummed out because it has none of what makes The Twilight Zone so great.

I mean, think about it, what's the story of the Tower of Terror?

Five people climb into an elevator on a dark and stormy night, it's struck by lighting,

and it just kind of disappears into the 5th dimension.

Now years later we're getting on a similar elevator on a similar night where the same

thing is about to happen.

It's a cool setup for a ghost story, but it lacks virtually everything that makes The

Twilight Zone so unique and special.

In fact, if anything, the Tower of Terror is a better prequel to a Twilight Zone episode

than it is an episode itself.

I could see the elevator event being the inciting incident of an episode, where it happens in

the first five minutes, and then we would spend the rest of the episode learning more

about the people in the elevator and slowly discovering why they were all doomed to their fate.

I know people are going to point to the made-for-TV movie with Kirsten Dunst and Steve Guttenberg,

since it does just that.

It's nice that it fleshes out the ghost story a little more, but that was mostly Michael

Eisner's penchant for synergy, and an attraction story should stand on its own.

Not to mention that the film, like the ride, lacks the qualities of what we would expect from

The Twilight Zone.

It adds scope to the story, but not depth.

And in the film's defense, it wasn't really trying to be the Twilight Zone anyway, but perhaps

that's part of why all of this doesn't gel together.

Beyond that I can't fully blame Disney because if I'm being honest, I think the ride and

the property are a bad match to begin with.

The Tower of Terror is a free fall ride.

It's all about the tension and the rush that comes with the drop.

The Twilight Zone is a slow pace character driven experience that invites introspection.

It just doesn't match.

All you have to do is look next door at Rock n Roller Coaster to see an example of when

it does match.

Rock and Roll is loud and fast and exciting, and roller coasters are loud and fast and exciting.

Now, if you've read into the history of The Tower of Terror, you probably already

know why this is all so disjointed.

The truth is, the Tower of Terror wasn't originally supposed to be a Twilight Zone ride.

The initial concept, to put it shortly, was for a horror comedy dark ride hosted by Mel

Brooks, who had created Young Frankenstein.

From there it evolved from a castle to a hotel when plans for Sunset Blvd started to form.

From there it turned from a dark ride into a drop ride and then finally the Twilight

Zone rights were brought on and integrated.

So, it makes sense.

The Twilight Zone was just kind of squeezed in there.

In any case, what's the point?

Why am I saying all this?

I genuinely believe we'll see major changes to the Tower of Terror in the next five years

or so after Galaxies Edge opens.

I have a theory that it might become Marvel related in the event Disney can secure the

rights from Universal, but I have a whole other video about that if you want to hear more.

However even if that theory is flat-out wrong, one common rumor floating around lately is

that Disney is looking to eventually strip the Twilight Zone from the ride, just leaving

the haunted hotel story.

It makes sense.

In a park quickly shifting its focus to big popular contemporary IPs, the Twilight Zone

just seems a little out of place right now.

On top of that, CBS recently moved forward with yet another reboot of the franchise,

with Get Out director Jordan Peele executive producing.

So if the reboot ends up being even half as good as Get Out was, then I think it's safe

to say CBS is going to want to hike up the cost of the rights whenever that contract

is up for renewal.

Disney fans tend to get, well, let's just say emotional, whenever a classic attraction

is touched, and so I guess I wanted to make this video to point out that if Disney does

indeed strip the Twilight Zone from the Tower of Terror, it'll actually be to the rides benefit.

It'll free up the Imagineers to flesh out the story so that it can better fit the mold

of the ride without having to worry about checking off Twilight Zone elements from a

list, which personally I don't think it currently does very well anyway.

I mean, just look at Disney SEA's Tower of Terror over in Tokyo.

That already lacks the Twilight Zone IP, and it's fantastic.

It's got an original and fitting story that reminds me of the kind of storytelling we

used to get with classic Disney rides.

I think the Tower of Terror is fantastic, and I think it has the potential to be even better.

And while I grew up watching and loving The Twilight Zone, I think the first step in realizing

that potential for the ride is dropping The Twilight Zone property and letting it find

its own unique voice.

I want to thank you all for watching!

I love when people get creative, so I want to throw this question out there: What kind

of story and ride mechanics would you want to see in a completely original Twilight Zone

theme park ride?

Let me know in the comments below, and I'll see ya next time!