an online MOBA like none other a game full of outstanding splashes arts, a friendly
community and an excellent balance team. This is League of Legends.
the whole point of the game is to progress through the map and destroy the
crystal thing called the Nexus the first team to destroy the enemies Nexus wins
the little characters in his screen are now on core champions
these are player controlled characters that you use in the game to destroy the
enemies Nexus as of when I'm recording this video there are hundred forty
champions each with unique storyline behind them
this is called the universe of legal agents an upstanding page with a
released new law that can keep you reading for months on end these stories
go into details of your favorite champions and other champions if friends
or enemies worth a lot of a law and stories into wine in game any
connections to special interactions take place the beauty of the artwork and the
effort put into all of this in the places of legal agents kinda makes it
beautiful with all the different places that champions come from in the world of
the Galatians but enough of this let's get into some gameplay the tutorial for
League of Legends is little lackluster it gives you the basis of the game but
some of the crucial aspects it doesn't even tell you about doesn't inform you
of jungling which is one of the biggest things in the legends or even lane
control which is actually massive in all MOBA games makes a game a lot harder to
learn because you have the result to experience as a main factor for
educating yourself but now let's look at a real game of League of Legends a
normal gamer League of Legends is fun energetic happy based game with friends
but please do not get it confused with this ranked play you see he has a level
scum in normal play and he is the level scum in ranked play ranked play will
bring out the most toxic to lowlifes you'll ever see the amount of times I've
been told to kill myself as Ashley depressing no matter how high climb on
the solo queue ladder you'll always see some booster players or some very
interesting plays the game's heavily feel like it's decided on your worst
play instead of your best play man nothing beats is feeling like looking at
a bot lane and seeing a six and twenty six bot Lane I mean what even supposed
to do in that situation
For more infomation >> Who is League of Legends? (Review) - Duration: 3:31.-------------------------------------------
Trump's Nobel Prize Is Looking Like a Reality After Everything He's Recently Done! - Duration: 4:58.
Trump's Nobel Prize Is Looking Like a Reality After Everything He's Recently Done!
As most of us Trump supporters have known from the beginning the president was bound
to do some great things.
But perhaps one of the greatest to date has been the peace talks between North and South
Korea.
Last night, while some of his staff were at the White House Correspondents' dinner,
President Trump was busy holding a rally for his supporters in the red state of Michigan.
But what was perhaps the most surprising was what the crowd kept chanting during his speech.
"Nobel, Nobel, Nobel" could be heard echoing through the arena of 10k people while 20k
people waited outside because there wasn't enough space to get in.
When President Trump heard the chants you could tell he was honored.
He laughed and responded, "I just want to get the job done, Strength is going to keep
us out of nuclear war."
Trump then went on to mock the "fake news" media and his critics.
Where instead of at least giving him credit for getting both parties together they are
questioning the validity of the developments.
To which the President repeated he was not about to play games with North Koreans dictator
Kim Jong-un despite the positive signed he has shown towards bringing peace to the region.
Here is more on the North Korean story via ABC News:
"The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee said there is "more than a ray
of light" in the Trump administration's dealings with Kim Jong Un over his nuclear
program.
Rep. Adam Schiff of California responded to ABC News Chief White House Correspondent Jonathan
Karl's comment on "This Week" Sunday recalling what former President Obama told
President Donald Trump about North Korea.
"I remember well when President Obama had his first meeting with President-elect Trump,"
Karl said, "and he said that the biggest challenge in the new president's agenda
was going to be North Korea, and it looked — I mean it looked very dark, and now there
is — there is an opportunity."
Schiff responded, "There is more than a ray of light here."
Asked if he believes Trump deserves some credit for the opening with North Korea, Schiff said,
"I think it's more than fair to say that the combination of the president's unpredictability
and, indeed, his bellicosity had something to do with the North Koreans deciding to come
to the table.
But before the president takes too much credit or hangs out the 'mission accomplished'
banner, he needs to realize that we may go into a confrontational phase and he may not
want the full blame if things go south."
At a rally in Michigan on Saturday night, Trump spoke of the progress with North Korea,
saying, "I had one of the fake news groups this morning.
They were saying, 'What do you think President Trump had to do with it?'
I'll tell you what.
Like, how about everything?"
The House Intelligence Committee's ranking Democrat also said the Trump administration
needs to be cautious in any negotiations with Kim Jong Un.
In previous talks, it has turned out that North Koreans "have something very different
in mind when they talk about denuclearization: 'Yes, if the U.S. gives up their nukes,
we'll give up ours; if the U.S. leaves the Korean Peninsula, then we can talk,'" Schiff
said.
The question for the Trump administration over Kim Jong Un's stated willingness to
negotiate is, "Is this something new, or is this simply Kim Jong Un as Dr. Jekyll and
Mr. Hyde, who is in the phase right now of conciliation?"
Schiff said.
North and South Korean leaders met Friday and vowed to formally end to their six-decade
long war by the end of the year, and to work to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula.
President Donald Trump speaks during a joint press conference with Germany's Chancellor
Angela Merkel in the East Room of the White House, April 27, 2018.more +
Schiff on "This Week" cautioned that the Trump administration's threat to possibly
pull out of the Iran nuclear deal could weaken its chances of success with North Korea.
"If we drop out of the Iran agreement, if we renege on the Iran deal when the Iranians
are complying, it is, I think, dangerously naïve to think that this is not going to
influence whether the North Koreans think we can be trusted and what's more, whether
the rest of the world will have confidence that the U.S. keeps its word," the congressman
said."
Going back to the chants, why doesn't President Trump deserve the Nobel Peace Price considering
he was instrumental in bringing this war which has lasted over half a decade to an end?
If former President Barack Hussein Obama got one for just being able to con enough of the
American public into voting him in as president just because of his skin color then why doesn't
President Trump deserve a peace prize for doing something which actually matters to
the world and which has alluded every president since Truman.
What do you think about this?
Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe
USA facts today.
-------------------------------------------
Jenna Bush Begins Crying on Live TV, Reveals How President Bush is Doing After Wife's Death - Duration: 4:43.
For more infomation >> Jenna Bush Begins Crying on Live TV, Reveals How President Bush is Doing After Wife's Death - Duration: 4:43. -------------------------------------------
Kate is helping Meghan Markle learn the Queen's etiquette before the royal wedding - Duration: 4:56.
Kate is helping Meghan Markle learn the Queen's etiquette before the royal wedding
William Hanson, who has advised private households on etiquette for many years, believes Meghan will look to Kate for tips as the Duchess is the most recent person to marry the Royal Family.
While Meghan may be given a "a 'get out of jail' free card" for her American mannerisms, Prince Harry's fiancee will have to learn the Queen's etiquette as she represents Her Majesty at future royal engagements.
The Duchess is likely to have been advising Meghan on royal fashion as well as conversation techniques.
William Hanson said: "Meghan won't have a specific tutor, but the royal household and other members of the Royal Family who have 'married in' will be passing on their knowledge to the newest addition.
"As the most recent person to marry into the Royal Family The Duchess of Cambridge will be of the most use to Meghan, I would imagine.
"I suspect Catherine will be passing on an array of things she has learned – some the hard way – to Meghan, mainly focussing on wardrobe pitfalls and traps and perhaps also conversational techniques too.
He also told the Evening Standard: "Meghan will also be observing others, too, watching and copying certain mannerisms or tricks that they do to cope and successfully navigate the pitfalls of court life.
"Her fiancé will, of course, also be sharing his considerable knowledge too.
"I suspect Prince Harry may have given her an amusing run down on the many weird and wonderful ways of the English class system.
"But as an American, I think Meghan will be given a 'get out of jail' free card with all that – unlike Catherine – as the English do often excuse foreigners from knowing the ins and outs of it all.
The former US actress will become a member of the Royal Family on May 19 when she marries Prince Harry in St George's Chapel in Windsor Castle.
Mr Hanson also suggested that Meghan may struggle with to reign in her "touchy feely" nature as "Americans are much more tactile than we Brits".
He added: "We have already seen many examples of Meghan being much more touchy feely than many of our existing royalty.
"This may well be a conscious choice on her part and may be one of the ways that she plays her part in evolving the monarchy, but this touchy feely cannot happen everywhere that she will go and so she may well struggle with having to learn when to be informal and when to be slightly more reserved.
During a visit to Birmingham last month with Harry, Meghan apparently broke royal protocol when she hugged a 10-year-old girl fan.
During the visit Harry began asking a group of schoolchildren about their hopes for the future and when 10-year-old Sophia Richards said she wanted to be an actress, the Prince took her over to meet Meghan.
The former Suits star the quickly hugged Sophia, who was clearly overwhelmed to meet Meghan.
And this is not the first time Meghan has shared an embrace with a member of the public – during her visit to Scotland she hugged a homeless charity volunteer who told her she was "deeply inspired" by her.
She also embraced Pippa Roberts, aged 10, from Mere Green Primary School in Sutton Coldfield after a request from the youngster who said: I said, can I have a hug and she said yes - it was nice.
-------------------------------------------
Ant McPartlin is 'going through a midlife crisis', claims Piers Morgan - Duration: 4:21.
Ant McPartlin is 'going through a midlife crisis', claims Piers Morgan
Good Morning Britain host Piers, who earlier today slammed Diane Abbott live on air, has spoken frankly about the fallen star as new photos show hes out of rehab.
Despite reports claiming he wont be back on TV until 2019, Ant, 42, was pictured beaming away as he played with his dog Hurley.
Not wanting to cut him any slack, Piers said: I dont feel any sympathy for him over what happened, and nor, knowing him as well, do I think hed want or expect any.
But its awful to see a good mate going through such a turbulent period in his life. Ant was fined a record-breaking £86,000 after pleading guilty to drink-driving in Wimbledon Magistrates Court earlier this month.
"He's clearly going through a crisis in his life and needs proper time and help to sort himself out" Piers Morgan While the fine is the largest on record, the amount is less than the ITV regular is said to be earning a week.
Court documents claimed he rakes in approximately £130,000 over a seven-day period.
Admitting hes not besties with Ant, Piers added in his Event magazine column: Im not one of his closest friends by any means, but we worked together for four years on Britains Got Talent and enjoyed many a pint and laugh together after long audition days.
As a result, I can attest that Ant McPartlin is one of the good guys in a business full of nasty pieces of work.
But hes clearly going through a crisis in his life and needs proper time and help to sort himself out..
The claim comes just weeks after Piers told Daily Star Online that Ant is causing havoc.
Only Ant knows how he was really feeling, he explained.
I guess that it is clear that he is not quite right and people that genuinely care about him just want him to sort himself out properly.
When you are getting into cars in what appears to be that kind of state and you are hitting other cars with kids in it it is a massive wake-up call. Never one to mince his words, the outspoken star added: Ant has to sort himself out because at the moment he is causing chaos..
Meanwhile, Declan Donnelly is set to host Britains Got Talent alone for the first time ever.
The dad-to-be has stepped up to the plate and agreed to front Simon Cowells talent contest when the live shows start next month.
However, a source told Daily Star Online they are apprehensive about the plans.
Dec stood up to the plate and continued [Saturday Night] Takeaway like a pro, but BGT is a whole different situation.
Takeaway was his own show, whereas with BGT he is dancing to someone elses tune..
-------------------------------------------
Netanyahu reports he has intel that proves Trump's claims Iran is lying - Duration: 3:18.
For more infomation >> Netanyahu reports he has intel that proves Trump's claims Iran is lying - Duration: 3:18. -------------------------------------------
BREAKING Feds Raid Florida Mosque – What They Find Inside Is Horrifying - Duration: 11:38.
BREAKING: Feds Raid Florida Mosque – What They Find Inside Is Horrifying
The mainstream media is constantly trying to make it look like Muslim migrants are "peaceful"
people who pose no threat to Americans.
What federal authorities just discovered in Florida, however, proves this is often not
the case at all.
Front Page Magazine reported that CAIR-Florida Regional Operations Director Nezar Hamze has
just been caught giving gun training tutorials at Islamic centers all over the state.
One of the centers he has appeared at is the Islamic Society of Sarasota and Bradenton,
a radical mosque with a sinister past that includes links to terrorists as well as supports
for suicide bombers and their families.
Not only is Hamze the CEO and Regional Operations Director for CAIR-Florida, he is also a Deputy
in the Broward County Sheriff's Office (BSO).
He has used his position as a deputy sheriff to go to mosques all over Florida and teach
the congregations how to use guns properly and how to obtain government grants for security
systems (to protect from law enforcement conducting surveillance).
One mosque that Hamze gave his gun training lesson at is Masjid Jamaat Al-Mumineen (MJAM),
located in Margate, Florida.
Izhar Khan, the mosque's imam who attended Hamze's lesson, has previously been arrested,
according to the indictment against him, for "collecting and delivering money for the
Pakistani Taliban."
ISSB has a long history of sketchy activity, and it's own imam was previously involved
in terrorism.
In 2002, the mosque hired Muneer Arafat to be it's imam.
Prior to moving to Florida, Arafar had been living in St. Louis, where he met al-Qaeda
and Hamas operative Ziyad Khaleel, who became his roommate.
For Hamze and CAIR to be giving gun training lessons at mosques that have links to terrorism
is a clear danger to the people of Florida.
SHARE this story if you think Donald Trump should take action to stop this before someone
gets hurt!
-------------------------------------------
FC Bayern's pre-match training in Madrid – Heynckes: "Our goal is the final" - Duration: 1:49.
Bayern's pre-match training session in Spain,
marking the final stage of preparation for the Champions League semi-final return against Real Madrid.
Boss Jupp Heynckes' troops are fired up and determined to prevail in the Spanish capital,
turn the tie around and seal a berth in the final in Kyiv.
We have to take all the chances that may come our way.
That's the thing we didn't do so well last Tuesday, when we were a little careless.
Obviously, we have to create those chances and turn them into goals.
We have to be greedy for goals and go in where it hurts in the box.
That would make it a very fiery encounter.
The flight from Munich to the Spanish capital took two hours.
Jupp Heynckes has brought a large and top-class squad with him,
lacking injured players like Robben, Boateng, Vidal, Coman and Neuer,
but including Alaba and Martínez, who are back from rehab.
The goal is clear: FC Bayern are far from eliminated
and have come to Spain with a clear plan.
We still have one big goal despite losing 2-1 in Munich:
make it to the Champions League final. Of course we know Real Madrid want to prevent that,
but I think desire can move mountains in football. We won't give up, and we'll give it everything tomorrow.
-------------------------------------------
Everyone is Religious - Debunked (Jordan Peterson) - Duration: 10:03.
On the 29th of March, 2018, Jordan Peterson visited Lafayette [la-fee-et] College to give
a lecture and Q&A session, and the students' questions were absolutely brilliant, because
unlike most questions posed to Jordan, theirs caused him to truly elaborate on his beliefs
(and so grand job people).
Anyhow, one of those questions was "How do you define what is considered religious",
and Jordan's response was "Religious is what you act out", which is to say that
since everyone "acts out" everyone is religious.
This, is "Everyone is Religious – Debunked."
"Thank you for being here, I really appreciate it.
Um, so I was watching a few of your interviews in preparation for this, and I heard you speak
about religion quite a bit, and if you look up what religion means in Webster Dictionary
you get something like 'A system of faith centred on a supernatural being or beings'
or something like that.
But I've heard you use religion to describe things like punk-rockers, for example, like
that's a religious experience – so my first question would be, how do you define
what is considered religious?
And then sort of as a follow-up to that, um, if say, Sam Harris--" "Religious is what
you act out."
"What's that?"
"Religious is what you act out."
"Anything you act out?"
"Everything you act out is predicated on your implicit axioms, and the system of implicit
axioms that you hold as primary is your religious belief system.
It doesn't matter whether you're an atheist or not.
That's just surface… that's just surface noise."
So there's the claim – Jordan asserts your implicit axioms (or assumptions) are
your religious beliefs, and so he's implicitly asserting that since everyone has implicit
axioms, therefore everyone has religious beliefs.
"It doesn't matter whether you're an atheist or not."
Or in other words, Jordan asserts that everyone is religious!
Now before I address this claim, here's the justification that he gave (it's several
minutes long, but it's a necessary listen): "So it has nothing to do with divinity,
or?"
"No I didn't say that."
"Or it doesn't necessarily have to do with those?"
"No, it probably necessarily has to do with it to, but it doesn't necessarily have anything
to do with your voluntarily articulated statements about whether or not you believe in something
like a transcendent deity.
So, I mean, what you act out is much more what you are than what you say about yourself.
What the hell do you know about what you believe in anyways?
You're complicated man."
"That's a fair question."
"Well seriously, people are complicated.
You know, like, we're not transparent to ourselves at all.
That's why we have… that's why we have to go to universities and study psychology
– it's like, you know, we're not exactly blank boxes, but we're the most complicated
things there are, right?
And we can't even program our VCR clocks, so, it's like, how the hell can we propose
to understand ourselves, and, you know, I'm existentially oriented – which is to say
that what you hold to be true is best determined as a consequence of an analysis of your actions
rather than as a consequence of an analysis of what you purport to believe."
"Now, in order to act… you can't act without a hierarchy of value (which I tortured
a poor questioner about), you can't act without a hierarchy of values because you
can't act unless you think one thing is better than another.
Why would you act otherwise?
So that means you're embedded in a hierarchy of values, whether you know it or not – or
maybe multiple fragmentary and competing hierarchies of value (which is all the worst for you,
by the way, because it just makes you very confused).
That hierarchy of values has an axiomatic… it's based on axioms, and the probability
that you understand them is very low, because generally people don't understand their
axioms, but that axiomatic system is essentially your religious system.
And there's no way out of that, so far as I can tell."
"And you can say, 'Well, it's not predicated on conscious belief in a transcendent deity',
it's like okay, have it your way, but know most people in this room act out a Judeo Christian
ethic.
And not only do they act it out, if they're treated in a manner that's not commensurate
with that ethic, they get very, very, very annoyed."
"So for example if I--" Okay, so just as a side note, I'm going to skip Jordan's
assertion that most Westerns act out a Judeo Christian ethic simply because it's not
the assertion at hand, but know that I'll address this pernicious claim within the next
month.
I entirely recognise how prevalent it's become, and because of this it's at the
very top of my list.
"It's like okay then, that's what you believe.
Well if I ask you if you believe any of that, well then that's a whole different story.
You might give me some radical leftist nonsense, but that--" "I'd try not to."
"Haha.
That doesn't take away from the fundamentals of your action."
So there's a lot on the table now, and that's actually my first point.
Jordan has a habit of "sandwiching" absurd, unfounded and nonsensical claims between valid,
insightful and humble claims, and his acolytes unfortunately equate the validity, insight
and humility of his "bread" with his "filling".
So in this case, his filling (or primary assertion) is that "The system of implicit axioms that
you hold as primary is your religious belief system", and his bread consists of many
slices – the first being that actions speak louder than words "What you act out is much
more what you are than what you say about yourself"; the second being that we act
according to hierarchies of value "You can't act without a hierarchy of values because
you can't act unless you think one thing is better than another"; and the third being
that most people don't even know (let alone understand) their axioms "That hierarchy
of values has an axiomatic… it's based on axioms, and the probability that you understand
them is very low."
Now that's a lot of bread, and yet the bread's fine… it's the filling that's off – and
it's off because it's nonsensical.
If we say that "Religious is what you act out" then all of our actions are religious,
and therefore the act of praying five times a day or the mutilation of a child's genitalia
to appease a deity is just as "religious" as going to the cinema, drinking a glass of
water, going for a walk, or taking a dump… which is to say that it's a useless definition,
and thus nonsensical.
But to be clear, let me repeat what I've said in regards to Jordan redefining other
words – there's nothing inherently wrong with him creating a new definition of "religion",
but what is wrong is how he uses it.
The reason he can say that "Christianity is true" ("I think it's true and not true.
The stories are erroneous in detail and right in pattern."
is because rather than using the colloquial definition of "truth" (that being "That
which is in accordance with reality"), he's created a new definition of "truth" (that
being "That which promotes reproduction"); the reason he can say that the bible is "More
real than real" ("A great novel is more real than real.
And, eh, and eh, a collection of stories like the bible, that's more real than meta-real.
It's more real than fiction is") is because rather than using the colloquial definition
of "real" (that being "Having objective existence"), he uses an obscure definition
of "real" (that being "Having conceptual existence"); and the reason he can say that
everyone is religious ("You can't be a non-believer in your action") is because he's created
a new definition of "religion" that's somehow more vague than the already useless
"A pursuit or interest followed with great devotion."
On the topic of religion, this is what Jordan does, and it's precisely why I, and many
others, have accused him of language-games.
And the worst part about it is he's not at all upfront about the obscure (and sometimes
entirely made up) definitions that he uses until someone essentially forces him to be
so.
Until that point, most of his Christian follows simply assume he's using their language (and
that he therefore he shares their beliefs), while most of his irreligious follows feel
confused and often convince themselves that he's just being poetic.
Now, I could conclude here, but instead, in the attempt to really make clear the problem
with Jordan's definition, I'm going to apply it syllogistically, and then compare it to
an equally fallacious argument.
So, consider the following.
Premise 1): Pope Francis is religious.
Premise 2): Stephen Woodford is religious.
Conclusion: both Francis and Stephen are religious.
And here's the comparative argument.
Premise 1): Peter Dinklage is a vegetarian.
Premise 2): Jordan Peterson is a vegetarian.
Conclusion: both Peter and Jordan are vegetarian.
So both of these argument are flawed for exactly the same reason – they either commit an
Equivocation Fallacy by using one definition of their keyword during their first premise
and conclusion, and a completely made up (and useless) definition during their second premise
(and are thus invalid), or they use a nonsensical definition throughout, which while valid,
in the context of their conversation only serves to confuse and obfuscate the underlining
question.
Anyhow, as always, thank you kindly for the view, and an extra special thank you to my
wonderful patrons and those of you who've donated via PayPal.
Oh, and to make up for a lack of a patron of the month last month, this month has two
– so, Patrick Manion, you've won a copy of The Portable Atheist by Christopher Hitchens,
and Jonlin, you've won a copy of The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins – congratulations!
Until next time my fellow apes, until next time!
-------------------------------------------
OJJDP Is Committed to Safeguarding Children - Duration: 3:04.
CAREN HARP: Hello I'm Caren Harp,
Administrator of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
April is National Child Abuse Prevention Month.
OJJDP encourages families, communities, and our partners to take this time
to renew their commitment to safeguarding children, a commitment we renew every day.
Too many youth are witnesses or victims of violence in their homes neighborhoods and schools.
Sadly in 2018 we've already seen several tragic instances of this exposure through school shootings.
In February, the shooting in Parkland, Florida claimed 17 lives
and in March, a shooting at Great Mills High School in Maryland,
not far from our offices here in Washington DC,
left one student and the gunman dead and another student wounded.
As a longtime prosecutor, public defender,
and former chief of a family court sex crimes prosecution unit,
I am keenly aware of the horrific crimes done to and by youth.
That's why my staff and I collaborated to revise our agency's priorities
to focus more specifically on enhancing public safety, ensuring accountability,
and empowering youth to take responsibility for their choices.
We must make resources available to protect children and help young crime victims recover.
At the same time we must hold young offenders accountable and
rehabilitate them so that they can grow up to lead productive law-abiding lives.
OJJDP supports a wide range of programs to address child abuse and neglect
and their related consequences.
We fund and support the growth of Children's Advocacy centers across the country.
In 2017, 854 centers were integral to the investigation and prosecution
of child abuse cases involving more than 334,000 children.
We partner with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
to offer critical intervention and prevention services such as the AMBER alert program
and the CyberTipline
that help families and law enforcement resolve cases of Missing and Exploited Children.
OJJDP also established the Internet Crimes Against Children program,
also known as ICAC, and through our continued support
ICAC task forces have received more than 775,000 reports
of online victimization and made upwards of 83,000 arrests.
Data is important, but truly our focus is on children.
Our Changing Minds campaign provides those who work with children
the tools proven to help kids heal.
Likewise, our model programs guide presents comprehensive information
on effective resources practitioners can use to help children and youth
who are exposed to violence and victimization.
OJJDP envisions a nation where our children are free from crime and violence.
Working together we can achieve this vision.
For more information about OJJDP programs,
visit our website at OJJDP.gov. Thank you.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét