Waching daily Apr 28 2018

A Video From Robert Mueller's Past Just Resurfaced And Now Everyone Is Asking This

One Question

Robert Mueller is in big trouble.

A video from his past has just resurfaced.

And now everyone is asking this one important question.

Mueller's honesty and integrity as an investigator are being called into question.

Despite his reputation as a squeaky clean lawman, the reality is far grimmer.

In 2003, Mueller testified to Congress supporting the false notion that Saddam Hussein possessed

weapons of mass destruction.His testimony helped launch the Iraq War.

Trump won the election in part because of his vocal opposition to the war.

Mueller's image as a hyper-competent FBI Director has also been undercut.

In 2001, the FBI – under his watch – bungled the investigation into the post 9/11 anthrax

attacks.

Daniel Ashman wrote in The Federalist:

"Mueller's FBI honed in on Steven Hatfill as the culprit — a "flag-waving" American,

who had served in the Army, then dedicated himself to protecting America from bioterrorist

threats by working in the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases.

There was no direct link from Hatfill to the attacks, by the FBI's own admission, and

the bureau never charged Hatfill.

The FBI did however spy on, follow, and harass him non-stop for years.

The Department of Justice also publicly outed Hatfill as the possible terrorist.

While Hatfill's dignity and life was being trampled on by America's secret police,

Mueller took a stand.

But on a different topic.

He made front page news for threatening President Bush he would resign over NSA policy.

All while his own team was trampling on the rights of an American in the FBI's largest-ever

investigation.

Hatfill successfully sued the government for its unlawful actions.

He won almost $6 million dollars.

After the Hatfill investigation blew up in the FBI's face, they moved on to Bruce Ivins,

another Army researcher who had actually volunteered to help the FBI investigate this case, and

had been doing so for years.

It wasn't until five years after the attack that Mueller's men decided Ivins was a target.

The FBI case against Ivins, once again, was based on circumstantial evidence…

… Ivins was never indicted, just given the Hatfill treatment.

His house was raided, and he was threatened with a death sentence, or as his lawyer put

it, put under "relentless pressure of accusation and innuendo."

He committed suicide."

Mueller's tenure at the FBI was a mess.

Donald Trump has every right to question his honesty, competency, and objectivity.

Do you agree?

Let us know your thoughts in

the

comment section.

For more infomation >> A Video From Robert Mueller's Past Just Resurfaced And Now Everyone Is Asking This One Question - Duration: 11:16.

-------------------------------------------

California Is Complaining About This New Immigration Tactic - Duration: 11:47.

California Is Complaining About This New Immigration Tactic

Earlier this week, President Trump proposed a new question to add in the 2020 census form.

The question is sparking controversy as it involves questioning one's citizenship.

Now, the blue-dominated state of California is whining over this new tactic–and is going

so far as to sue.

The Trump administration vowed to include the question of whether someone was a citizen

or not on the 2020 census.

California rebutted with their decision to sue the administration.

The Attorney General, Xavier Becerra, announced the suit against the government, claiming

the question was "unlawful."

Attorney General Becerra tweeted the decision:

Fox News reported:

The Commerce Department said in a statement that the citizenship question would be added

in response to a request by the Justice Department made in December.

The statement said that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross "has determined that reinstatement

of a citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire is necessary to provide

complete and accurate census block level data."

Democrats have criticized the administration's announcement, saying the inclusion of such

a question amounts to an effort to intimidate immigrant communities and siphon money and

electoral power away from them.

In a San Francisco Chronicle opinion piece published Monday, Becerra and California Secretary

of State Alex Padilla wrote that the inclusion of a citizenship question would be "illegal"

and "an extraordinary attempt by the Trump administration to hijack the 2020 census for

political purposes."

"California, with its large immigrant communities, would be disproportionately harmed by depressed

participation in the 2020 census," they wrote.

"An undercount would threaten at least one of California's seats in the House of Representatives

(and, by extension, an elector in the electoral college.)"

It is likely the disapproval of the question stems from California's lost sanctuary city

policies.

Since the decennial census is required by Constitution to determine federal spending,

California's loss of funding would be devastating to the massive state.

Leave us your thoughts

in the comments

section below.

For more infomation >> California Is Complaining About This New Immigration Tactic - Duration: 11:47.

-------------------------------------------

Pirates: Jung Ho Kang Is 'Committed To Sobriety' - Duration: 2:23.

For more infomation >> Pirates: Jung Ho Kang Is 'Committed To Sobriety' - Duration: 2:23.

-------------------------------------------

Saturday is Station Café's last day on the Bentonville Square - Duration: 0:56.

For more infomation >> Saturday is Station Café's last day on the Bentonville Square - Duration: 0:56.

-------------------------------------------

What is best in life? Photography, apparently. || THE GOOD LIFE || 🕹 Slack Injection Arcade 👾 - Duration: 55:11.

For more infomation >> What is best in life? Photography, apparently. || THE GOOD LIFE || 🕹 Slack Injection Arcade 👾 - Duration: 55:11.

-------------------------------------------

2 Investigators: Is A Breeder Selling Sick Dogs? - Duration: 3:03.

For more infomation >> 2 Investigators: Is A Breeder Selling Sick Dogs? - Duration: 3:03.

-------------------------------------------

Rob Schneider Says Alec Baldwin's Trump is Hurting 'SNL' - Duration: 4:26.

Rob Schneider Says Alec Baldwin's Trump is Hurting 'SNL'

Rob Schneider is not a fan of Alec Baldwin playing Donald Trump on Saturday Night Live.

The SNL alum recently told the New York Daily News that his feelings on the matter have mostly to do with the fact it is well known that Baldwin hates the president.

Because of that, the impression is bad for the iconic sketch show, he says.

The fun of Saturday Night Live was always you never knew which way they leaned politically, he told the Daily News.

You kind of assumed they would lean more left and liberal, but now the cats out of the bag they are completely against Trump, which I think makes it less interesting because you know the direction the piece is going..

Using Dana Carvey as an example, Schneider said the comedians impression of George H.W.

Bush during his time in office worked well because Carvey had empathy for the then-president.

Carvey played it respectfully, Schneider said.

To me, the genius of Dana Carvey was Dana always had empathy for the people he played, and Alec Baldwin has nothing but a fuming, seething anger toward the person he plays..

Calling Baldwins Trump hard to watch, Schneider said the bit is hurting SNL.

Alec Baldwin is a brilliant actor … hes not a comedian, Schneider said.

I dont find his impression to be comical because, like I said, I know the way his politics lean and it spoils any surprise.

Theres no possible surprise.

He so clearly hates the man hes playing..

Schneider currently stars in Netflixs Real Rob.