TRUMP WAS RIGHT!
BEN CARSON JUST EXPOSED WHO OBAMA REALLY IS
Do you remember when Obama said "I've had the most scandal free, transparent administration
in history?"
Well that was really good joke.
It only past a week after the whole world learned about Obama's major unmasking scandal
and things are about to get even more interesting.
Dr. Ben Carson, the head of the Housing and Urban Development (HUD), just uncovered Obama's
worst scandal yet!
According to our source, Subject:Politics, DR.
CARSON FOUND $519.8 BILLION IN FRAUD BY OBAMA!
The conclusion is that Obama ROBBED the American taxpayers of $519.8 BILLION.
President Trump said he was going to crack down on waste, fraud, and abuse.. and obviously
he is doing it.
The most interested is that he he is starting with Obama!
In according to everything which is outlined above here's an excerpt from the audit performed
by Dr. Carson:
THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF ERRORS CORRECTED IN HUD'S NOTES AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WERE $516.4 BILLION AND $3.4 BILLION RESPECTIVELY.
THERE WERE SEVERAL OTHER UNRESOLVED AUDIT MATTERS WHICH RESTRICTED OUR ABILITY TO OBTAIN
SUFFICIENT, APPROPRIATE EVIDENCE TO EXPRESS OUR OPINION.
It all looks so incrediable!
But that is not all.
American taxpayers aren't the only ones Obama has stolen billions of dollars from.
The 2013 Treasury Department fiscal report showed that Obama also stole billions from
Fannie and Freddie Mac to fund Obamacare, or if he did't do that it would have died.
Scroll down to Watch Video
When is this tyrant, unfaithful ex-President going to be put on trial for all his crimes!?
We can't go a week without discovering another one of his earth shattering scandals.
Every single day we are expecting some new bigger scandal.
However, we have our president Donald Tramp who is always behind the heels of every single
lawbreaker.
Media, You Won't Destroy Ben Carson But Carson's news conference was most memorable
for his willingness to push back against the media: I do not remember this level of scrutiny
for one President Barack Obama when he was running.
In fact I remember just the opposite.
I remember people saying, 'Oh, we won't really talk about that.
We won't talk about that relationship.
Well, Frank Marshall Davis, well, we don't want to talk about that.
Bernardine Dohrn, Bill Ayers, well he don't really know him.
All the things that Jeremiah Wright was saying, oh, not a big problem.
A reporter responded to Carson's complaint that there was a "desperation on behalf
of some" to find some kind of scandal surrounding him by saying, "Our job is to ask questions."
Carson paused and said: "There is a fair way to do this and a very unfair way to do
this.
. . . My job is to call you out when you are unfair."
At another point he said: "You are not going to find with me, somebody who will sit back
and let you be completely unfair without letting the American people know what is going on.
The American people are waking up to these games."
RELATED: The Left Really Hates Ben Carson Carson's comments about the media, and his
complaints about Barack Obama, were — no surprise — barely reported.
But they deserve an airing.
By those standards, Barack Obama was clearly the beneficiary of enormous media forbearance
while he ran for president.
Readers have repeatedly asked us if Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson
initiated an audit of HUD's financial statements and found more than $500 billion in accounting
errors made by the Obama administration.
That may be because an article published April 6 by the conservative Daily Wire, andrepublished
or cited by other websites, wrongly credited Carson with uncovering the accounting mistakes.
Actually, the errors were discovered during an annual audit started in 2016 by HUD's
Office of the Inspector General, which has been headed by David A. Montoya since December
2011.
According to its website, the OIG, which has a separate budget from HUD, works independently
from the department in an effort to "promote efficiency and effectiveness in programs and
operations; detect and deter fraud and abuse; investigate allegations of misconduct by HUD
employees; and review and make recommendations regarding existing and proposed legislation
and regulations affecting HUD.
President Trump nominated Carson, a former neurosurgeon and Republican presidential candidate,
to serve as HUD secretary in December, but the Senate did not confirm Carson to the post
until March 2 — one day after the OIG published an updated report providing the total value
of the errors.
"HUD reissued its fiscal years 2016 and 2015 (restated) consolidated financial statements
due to pervasive material errors that we identified," the report said.
"The total amounts of errors corrected in HUD's notes and consolidated financial statements
were $516.4 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively."
But, as the report noted, the OIG first notified HUD officials last year of issues it found
during a routine review required by federal law.
That was long before Carson became secretary.HUD OIG, March 1: "On November 15, 2016, we
issued an independent auditor's report stating that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) was unable to provide final fiscal years 2016 and 2015 consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes in a timeframe that would allow us to obtain sufficient,
appropriate evidence to determine whether they were free from material misstatement.
We also reported on the delays encountered in the material weakness, Weak Internal Controls
Over Financial Reporting Led to Errors and Delays in the Preparation of Financial Statements
and Notes.
…"Despite having to disclaim on HUD's fiscal years 2016 and 2015 financial statements
and notes, we continued our review of the financial statements.
Our review identified material errors and misstatements in the financial statements
and notes.
The results of that review are contained in this report (see Material Weaknesses section)
and update the material weakness, Weak Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting Led to Errors
and Delays in the Preparation of Financial Statements and Notes, reported in Office of
Inspector General (OIG) audit reports 2017-FO-0003 and 2017-FO-0004."We notified HUD management
in early December 2016 and requested that it perform its own review.
HUD concluded its review and agreed with us that the pervasiveness and scope of the errors
contained in the financial statements justified the need to reissue the statements to correct
the errors.
HUD withdrew its AFR [agency financial report], and on December 28, 2016, HUD's Acting Chief
Financial Officer notified the Inspector General that HUD had requested from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) an extension for submitting its AFR from November 15, 2016,
to March 1, 2017."
For example, the OIG said at least $119 billion in errors were due to incorrect rounding.
"We found several instances in which rounding was performed to the nearest billion and hundred
billion, while OMB Circular A-136 requires the highest level of rounding to be at the
nearest million," the report said.
In conclusion, the report said "HUD was able to make revisions to correct the errors
identified and make other corrections that were later identified by OCFO," or the Office
of the Chief Financial Officer.
"OCFO reissued its financial statements, which included corrections totaling $516.4
billion to its notes and $3.4 billion to its financial statements."
The report refers to the total as an "absolute value."
That's because some of the errors were positive figures and others were negative.
In all, there were nearly $520 billion in changes.
However, in a Feb. 24 memo from Deputy Chief Financial Officer Courtney Timberlake, HUD
said, "Overall, the combined adjustments to the consolidated financial statements resulted
in a net adjustment of $3 million, but no change in HUD's financial position or impact
on our programs."
The OIG didn't dispute HUD's response, but called it an attempt by the department
to play down "the severity of the condition and impact of the errors identified."
The report said: "While the errors identified may not have changed HUD's financial position,
as HUD states at the bottom of its financial statements, 'The accompanying notes are
an integral part of these statements.'
These notes contained errors of $516.4 billion."
The bottom line: The OIG, not Carson, was responsible for the audit that led to the
correction of over $500 billion in bookkeeping errors by HUD during the Obama administration.
Carson wasn't in office when OIG initiated the audit and the secretary has no authority
over the independent IG office.
Scroll down to the comments and tell us what you think.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét