The word quantum appears very often in both cinematic and written media.
But what does this word really stand for? Analyzing certain experiments would be a
common way to approach this question.
However, the word 'quantum' can also be explained by looking
at the many differences between quantum and classical physics.
Here, we consider four big ways quantum physics and classical physics are different.
Suppose we put a classical ping-pong ball in the box and give it a good shake.
Now, if we know everything about the ball, its initial state and all the
forces acting on it during the shaking,
we can, in principle predict definitely where the ball ended up.
However, this is not so for quantum physics.
If you put a quantum ping-pong ball in a quantum box
and shake it, no matter how much we know about the system,
we cannot predict for sure where the ball will be.
This is because the system is "intrinsically random".
Does this mean that we cannot predict anything about the system at all?
Well, fortunately, we still can.
We can find out the chances of the ball appearing at some part of the box.
Unlike the classical ping pong ball which we know is a distinct object in the box,
we can only know a "distribution of probabilities"
of where the quantum ping-pong ball is going to be.
This spread is described by something called the wavefunction.
When we decide to make a measurement of its position,
the very act of measuring 'collapses' this wavefunction.
The ball is then known to be at a certain place in the box
There is also an important difference in finding
average values in these two levels of physics.
For the classical ping pong ball,
we take the average by repeatedly opening the box and measuring the ball's position.
It's not as if we need to shake the box in the exact same way again
to get another position value for the average value.
But this is kind of what happens in the quantum ball.
Recall that the act of measuring "collapses the wavefunction",
This means that a measurement has already changed the system.
It's like we have a whole different ball now.
Hence, we must be re-prepare a system in the original state.
Same kind of ball, same kind of box, but different balls and boxes nonetheless.
So unlike the classical analogy, the quantum analogy would have us shake the
box in the exact same way all over again, in order to get that average value we need.
Finally, quantum and classical physics are different in terms of what sorts of
energies are possible. What does this mean?
Consider the classical ping pong again.
It can move at any speed and, hence, take any value for the energy.
But, this is once again, not the case for the quantum ball in the box.
With some math, it can be shown the wavefunction
that describes the energies is composed of sines and cosines.
And because the probability of the ball being in the regions outside of the box is zero,
the wavefunction in the corresponding regions are also zero.
Now, one important rule in quantum physics is that wavefunctions must always be "continuous".
What this basically means is that, we keep only the sine waves here.
This may sound pretty abstract but it has an important implication:
Quantum balls, can only take certain energies.
Unlike the classical ping pong, the quantum ping pong
cannot take any energy, but can only take certain, specific energy values.
and this is what physicists call the "quantization of energy",
which puts the "quantum" in quantum physics.
With that said, we see four things that makes quantum, quantum.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét