Thứ Ba, 3 tháng 4, 2018

Waching daily Apr 3 2018

white folks thought that by giving us Christianity that they were giving us

something that would keep us docile that would oppress us but what man

intends for evil God uses for good and there's one priest that tells a

different story about the Christian faith of African people in America and

that's our discussion today

hey y'all welcome to Blacks with power where we are emancipating ourselves from

mental slavery so that we can lead the movement of Jah people out of Babylon

into the Promised Land I'm father Jabriel your host for this show thank you for

joining us subscribe to the show iTunes stitcher Google Play tune in watch us on

YouTube click the subscribe button and give a review give a thumbs up give a

thumbs down let me know what you liked what you dislike so that we can

fine-tune and refine this show for you and in this episode I want to introduce

you to some foundational things for me right this is near and dear to my heart

man it was back in 2004 yeah 2004 when you know just coming out of

Rastafarianism had been introduced to ethiopian orthodoxy

you know and on an on a trip I went to I was living in st. Louis Missouri misery

misery loves company I was living in st. Louis and went to visit my spiritual

father was living in Kansas City one of the one of the Ethiopian priests one of

the monks and um on that journey you know was was you know just was able to

see a consecration of an ordination reception rather of a priest into

Orthodoxy who came out of Roman Catholicism was into converted to

orthodoxy and was introduced to a a Serbian Orthodox priest named father

paisius house to now goes by father Alexei after his wife passed he became a

monk and when they become when you take orders of a monkey took it and took on a

new name of the the Brotherhood of st. Moses the black I'll put a link to the

Brotherhood st. Moses to black in the description you can find out more but

the book wade in the river the story of the African Christian faith right off

the bat you can see how much this book meant to me because when I finally

published my book if you see I wanted it to be as similar to um in in cover

layout and designed to father Alexis as possible man because it just had such a

profound effect on me you can find a link to this book you are on the

description you can get so you can get a copy but it's transformative so way in

the river the story of the African Christian faith I met I met father

paisius father Alexei in Kansas City and you know just you know he leads a

reconciliation network that talks about orthodoxy that talks about the witness

of the Christian faith and and he in in in in the course of our conversation he

gave me a copy of this book you know so that as he said so that inspiration of

of these holy ones may inspire me in my pursuit of the Christian faith and so we

talked about the African Christian faith what he does is he goes back through

ancient times through Old Testament times through ancient African history

and identifies the the icons of the faith who are African right he talks

about he talks about them talks about the martyrs of the church talks about

how the Fathers of monasticism did the first monks were African people how the

you know some of the some of the the defenders of the faith some of the ones

that helped Christianity to survive and it's early days were African people and

he makes the case for how Christianity cannot be could never be the white man's

religion that yes it has taken on that mantra in the West but if we are

students of history if we are students specifically of Christian history we

would know that it could never be don't white man's religion right and so you

know goes throughout the book and and then coming out of the Bible coming out

of Old Testament and New Testament history coming over to America coming

into the slave period talking about the deep Christian witness of slaves of of

the enslaved I don't know I still I'm reprogramming myself right we talked

about emancipating ourselves from mental slavery I don't I don't like to call my

ancestors our ancestors slaves every now and again I slip because they weren't

slaves they were people you know they are people they were enslaved

so I hear me say that check me on it correct me but to the faith of the

enslaved of those who were enslaved our ancestors and how those who so deeply

and strongly embraced Christianity were killed by their masters for their

Christian witness right and he talks about about all of those who you know he

doesn't list all of them no one can list all of the people right of that of the

American Holocaust of the Marfa right but he talks about many of those martyrs

of those Cross bearers of those passion bearers of those black persons who by

virtue of their faith were killed by those who did not want to see black

people by white folks who did not want to see black people embrace Christianity

to that degree and so in talking about all of these people who were killed for

preaching the Bible beyond slaves be obedient to your masters so those who

would dare go beyond that right those who were killed for gathering by the

river and baptizing and and and praying and and and and and and shouting and and

and singing and and and you know marrying people and and doing things in

in in Christian fashion that were killed because of their of their Christian

faith he talks about those who suffered for their Christian witness right and if

we know anything about Orthodox Christianity one of the names for

orthodoxy is the suffering faith right it is that

idea that um the deep faith of Christianity is born from suffering

because we follow Christ right and we follow Christ to the cross as he said

those who wish to come after me let them deny themselves and pick up their cross

and follow me for those who want to save their life will lose it but those who

lose their life for my sake and for the Gospels will save it and so this idea

that the true essence deep essence of the faith is born out of suffering right

and so what his premise is is that the Masters the slave masters wanted to give

black folks a a docile form of Christianity that would keep them

obedient not to God but obedient to white folks obedient to white power

obedient to white supremacy right and I want to make that distinction clear

because what we're talking about is not just obedient to their masters right

they were programming black folks to be obedient to white supremacy to acquiesce

to white power and so they wanted to give black folks a faith like that and

for many of us that's stuck right we we got a faith quote-unquote that kept us

in bondage to white supremacy in bondage to whiteness and bondage to white power

right but as father Aleksey argues in wade in the river

there were those of us that embrace the faith there is this legacy of African

people that embrace the faith in such a way that they were willing to suffer in

meaning to obey God and not man they were willing to obey God and not white

power they were willing to obey God and not white supremacy and because of that

they suffered under the hands of white supremacy but by that suffering similar

to how Christ suffered under the hands of the Romans and under

the hands of the Jewish leadership by their suffering under the hands of white

supremacy under the hands of their slave masters under the hands of those who

were upholding the institution of white power the faith of African people was

transformed into Orthodoxy it was transformed into something deep

something rich something beyond the Christianity that you found in white

society right that this the the enslaved that our ancestors were were were were

cultivated a faith that was deeper more Christian more authentic more orthodox

than the faith of white society that could abide with such a system of

oppression right or that could appease or placate or play nice with such a

system of oppression and so you know I really encourage you to read this book

get a copy of this book and read it because it serves as the backdrop for

for where my thinking came from right so if you want to understand

I don't know hell did this guy begin thinking like this right you read a copy

of this book and you understand you begin to understand that there is

something special about the black experience there is something

transformative transcendent even about the black experience something

transcendent about the authentic witness of the faith the Christian faith of

African people in this country right and when we see that it enables us helps us

to begin breaking free from this dynamic that keeps us in bondage to white power

and white supremacy keeps us in a quote unquote

faith narrative that keeps us docile that keeps us you know accomplices in

our own oppression and allows us to point

in a new direction that is liberating that is life-giving that is

transformative that resonates that that resembles in some sort of real way the

faith of Jesus Christ so again wade in the river the story of

the African Christian faith on the author's father paisius outs - you will

find the links to that in the description of this of of this episode

and I hope you get a copy and I'd love to know what you think what are your

thoughts on the idea of that one that the faith that was cultivated by those

who were enslaved the faith that was cultivated by the oppression that they

experienced by the suffering that they experienced that that faith became the

authentic witness of the gospel in America right so about that what do you

think of that idea that the faith of our ancestors that was born in slavery

became the authentic witness of Christianity and that it is the

authentic witness of Christianity in the West what do you think about that and

how does that shape your interpretation of your own faith I'd love to hear your

thoughts on that so leave a comment leave a review leave a thumbs up leave a

thumbs down let me know what your questions are as well because a charge

to keep we have brothers and sisters a God to glorify a never dying soul to

save and fit it for the sky we have come a long way but Lord knows there is a

long way yet to go so we ain't there yet so now let us march on till victory is

won live with power

For more infomation >> Black Christianity is the Authentic Christian Witness of America - Duration: 13:23.

-------------------------------------------

Is a comet heading towards Tilted Towers?! - Duration: 1:09.

Is a comet about to hit Tilted Towers?

Sure looks that way.

Tilted Towers is a very popular landing destination in Fortnite Battle Royale.

And if internet rumors are true, it's destruction is imminent.

It's no secret that for sometime now, Epic Games has not been too happy with Tilted Towers

or what it has become.

So, destroying it or changing is not too far-fetched.

Some players have noticed that some of the items for the Season 3 Battle Pass are space

themed.

Other players also believe that the new controller vibrations that were added to the game during

the recent update could also be connected to the rumored meteor strike.

Some have claimed that those vibrations are morse code that spells out "SOS 5D 418".

Well, It so happens that Tilted Towers is located in 5D of the map.

And 418 telling us it's April 18th.

But, don't send those hashtags RIP Tilted Towers just yet though, it's still a fan

theory and until Epic Games says otherwise, Tilted Towers is here to stay.

Let us know what you think, is Titled Towers going bye bye?

Leave us a comment below and come back to Fandom Fuel for more Fortnite News.

For more infomation >> Is a comet heading towards Tilted Towers?! - Duration: 1:09.

-------------------------------------------

Is Facebook Listening Through Your Smartphone Microphone Whistleblower Says "Yes" - Duration: 6:27.

Is Facebook Listening Through Your Smartphone Microphone Whistleblower Says �Yes�

By True Publica

A couple of years ago I had a pair of sunglasses stolen from my car when I forgot to take them

with me when the car was being serviced. I complained to the garage and indignantly reported

this important event to my wife. Spookily, the following day I started receiving ads

in my Facebook feed for where I could buy exactly the same pair of sunglasses. I thought

my natural gift of cynicism had turned into paranoia. As Joseph Heller said in Catch 22

� �Just because you�re paranoid doesn�t mean they aren�t.� In Facebook�s case

� it turns out they are!

From Canada�s National Post comes the report that one of their own citizens is testifying

that exactly my sunglasses experience was indeed not paranoia but a matter of fact � Facebook

did indeed have the capacity to listen in to my private conversations.

The report states �Facebook could be listening to its users� conversations through smartphone

microphones, Cambridge Analytica whistleblower Christopher Wylie says. He appeared in front

of a committee of British parliamentarians on Tuesday, and in his nearly four hours of

testimony� addressed the longstanding theory that Facebook spies on its users to shape

their advertising.�

The report goes on to say that last year, a YouTube video of a man claiming Facebook

gave him cat food ads because of a conversation with his girlfriend went viral. And the eavesdropping

claims are regularly discussed on social media. To be fair, the video is actually both quite

funny and just a bit scary.

Conservative MP Damian Collins, who chaired the committee, asked Wylie if the rumours

were true.

�There�s been various speculation about the fact that Facebook can, through the Facebook

app on your smartphone, listen in to what people are talking about and discussing and

using that to prioritize the advertising as well,� Collins said. �Other people would

say, no, they don�t think it�s possible. It�s just that the Facebook system is just

so good at predicting what you�re interested in that it can guess.�

Whilst Wylie said that he was only speculating (presumably to protect his legal position),

he went on to say that Facebook and other apps can listen in and figure out the context

of where you are based on the sounds in your environment. It picks up whether your TV is

on, or if you�re at work or at home based on �environmental context,� he said.

�There�s audio that could be useful just in terms of, are you in an office environment,

are you outside, are you watching TV, what are you doing right now?� Wylie said.

The social media giant has repeatedly denied using people�s microphones to target ads

or tailor users� news feeds. But Facebook also said that its app only accesses the microphone

on a smartphone if the user gave it permission to do so, and only if the user is using a

feature that requires audio, for example, if they are recording a video.

Last October, Facebook�s vice president of ads addressed the rumour again. �I run

ads product at Facebook. We don�t � and have never � used your microphone for ads.

Just not true,� Rob Goldman tweeted.

But as privacy activist Paul-Olivier Dehaye, who was at the hearing, points out, Facebook�s

�opaque� practices means there�s no telling how much data users hand over.

Dylan Curran at The Guardian downloaded his Facebook data � his was roughly 600MB, which

is roughly 400,000 Word documents. This includes every message you�ve ever sent or been sent,

every file you�ve ever sent or been sent, all the contacts in your phone, and all the

audio messages you�ve ever sent or been sent. It stores everything you liked and what

you and your friends talk about. They store all the apps you�ve downloaded, what type

of phone you have and when you bought it.

Curran confirms the data they collect which includes tracking where you are, what applications

you have installed, when you use them, what you use them for, access to your webcam and

microphone at any time, your contacts, your emails, your calendar, your call history,

the messages you send and receive, the files you download, the games you play, your photos

and videos, your music, your search history, your browsing history, even what radio stations

you listen to.

And there�s a sinister side to all of this. Facebook is willing to sell all this data

to anyone with enough money to buy it. It knows what your political tendencies are,

your sexual preferences and has even designed tools to understand what you are thinking

by your device keystrokes � and are quite prepared to sell these most private of thoughts.

In fact, according to the BBC, Facebook will sell 5,000 pieces of information about you.

Did you know you even had 5,000 pieces of interesting information to know? I didn�t.

But if they can listen in, record and store everything as you step through daily life,

then I guess they would. It�s not just about selling advertising though is it. It�s about

who they sell it to and what they want with it.

What happens if the government fancied the idea of clamping down on dissenting voices

for instance. Nah � they wouldn�t do that, would they? After Prime Minister Theresa May�s

recent announcement, you might want to think again.

Facebook has shown no professional ethics whatsoever � this much is revealed with

the scandal engulfing them with their association with Cambridge Analytica and SCL Elections.

There�s more to come on this story, of course�

For more infomation >> Is Facebook Listening Through Your Smartphone Microphone Whistleblower Says "Yes" - Duration: 6:27.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: Trump Just FIRED HER – The Entire White House Is Now On Edge - Duration: 5:10.

BREAKING: Trump Just FIRED HER – The Entire White House Is Now On Edge

From the time that President Trump took office, the Justice Department has been in the headlines.

The President has taken several measures to rectify the corruption within its ranks, and

not everyone appreciated it.

One of those measures was to clear out several of the Obama Administration officials that

could have potentially stayed after the administration change.

One of those officials was Sally Yates, who worked directly under Loretta Lynch.

The bad blood between the two is continuing, apparently, since Yates is still backtalking

the Commander-in-Chief, even after being fired rather abruptly.

This was the exchange that had the Twitterverse whispering and asking questions.

President Trump said, "So sad that the Department of "Justice" and the FBI are slow walking,

or even not giving, the unredacted documents requested by Congress.

An embarrassment to our country!"

No doubt that was partly in response to the many injustices that have been brought to

light with the extra investigations that Democrats insisted on.

Yates, a former part of the Deep State Justice Department, was obviously triggered by what

Trump tweeted as she replied with, "For 27 years, I was privileged to work with the

thousands of career DOJ lawyers and FBI agents who work hard every day to keep our country

safe, our rights protected, and the rule of law intact.

They deserve better than this."

As you can probably tell from the exchange, this isn't the first time that the President

and Yates have had a disagreement about something.

Yates was one of the very first firings that the President did after he came into office.

At the time, there was, of course, an outcry that he did so in order to cover something

up.

However, even Politico admits in a piece called "Why Trump Had to Fire Sally Yates" that

what Yates did was just too much insubordination.

According to Josh Blackman who is the author and a constitutional law professor, "The

acting attorney general should have given the president her best advice, then resigned

if he didn't listen."

But that's not what she did.

Here's a little backstory by Blackman about what did go down the night that Yates got

the ax:

"Democrats are calling it the Monday Night Massacre.

On Monday evening, Acting Attorney General Sally Yates announced that under her leadership,

the Justice Department would not defend President Donald Trump's executive order on immigration.

After acknowledging that the Office of Legal Counsel had reviewed the policy, and noting

that the Civil Division could defend it in court, she personally rebuffed the president's

judgment, which she did not find 'wise or just.'

Yates, a career prosecutor appointed by Barack Obama, is now being hailed for standing up

to a supposedly 'tyrannical' president, according to a statement blasted out by the

Democratic National Committee.

But this has it wrong.

If Yates truly felt this way, she should have told the president her conclusions in confidence.

If he disagreed, she had one option: resign.

Instead, she made herself a political martyr and refused to comply.

Trump obliged, and replaced her with the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia,

Dana Boente.

While this late-night termination may bring to mind President Richard Nixon's infamous

'Saturday Night Massacre,' the analogy is inapt.

This is a textbook case of insubordination, and the president was well within his constitutional

powers to fire her.

Call it the Monday Night Layoff instead.

While I defend Trump's constitutional authority to remove the acting attorney general, his

message accompanying the termination warrants a careful study.

Announcing her firing, the president wrote that Yates had "betrayed the Department

of Justice by refusing to enforce a legal order."

Charges of betrayal will only serve to chill voices of dissent within the Justice Department,

and limit internal checks on the White House.

Though Yates erred egregiously by making her opinion public, rather than resigning, others

within the executive branch should feel free to raise constitutional doubts to the White

House.

However, if those in the minority sense that they will be deemed traitors, the voices of

reason within the government will be silenced for fear of persecution.

I worry that Yates's foolish last stand will poison the well of President Trump's

already-low estimation of lawyers that tell him 'no.'

Her selfish act of painless self-flagellation—which will no doubt be rewarded by a lifetime of

adulation from the left—will in the long run be counterproductive, and unfortunately

inhibit dissent within an already skittish agency.

Yates's plan backfired, big league."

Yates not only made the road even harder for her own cause (which conservatives no doubt

thank her for) but she set herself up to be made an example of.

She fell prey to the same thing that many Washington insiders have fallen for; and that

is the idea that President Trump won't take harsh, decisive action against someone.

While he is a politician, he doesn't play politics the way many expected.

President Trump's already deep seeded doubt about lawyers, due to his extensive history

with them, has also been made worse by Yates, and others like her, attempting to manipulate

the country with their antics.

For now, though, President Trump is still calling the shots, and attorneys like Yates

and Lynch are relegated to the peanut gallery.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét