Chủ Nhật, 1 tháng 4, 2018

Waching daily Apr 1 2018

Why did you click this video?

You had hundreds of options, but you clicked on this one.

Was it your choice?

Did you do it out of your own free will?

Or did every single incident in your life, over the course of your brief existence led

up to this moment of you clicking this video?

Were you always supposed to click it, at this time of this day?

We think we are free.

We believe in choices, at least I did, when I was growing up.

The idea that things are pre-determined, and I might just be a puppet in this show, offended me

I thought, "You always have a choice."

But now, I am not so certain.

But I understand choices.

Choices create drama.

The thought that we could have prevented an accident, or chosen another better path, gives

us a sense of control, which in turn gives this existence, a texture.

If everybody knows, everything is determined already, and this is how things will unfold,

then there is no place for that sense of control; you are just watching a movie, and that has

terrifying implications.

My dad is intensely religious.

He believes in a deterministic universe.

According to his religion, everything that's happening has already happened and will continue

to happen.

It is an infinite cycle.

There is no doer, but just an illusion of things being done.

This thought is ingrained in him.

But no matter how deep someone's belief of a deterministic universe goes, they still

can't let go of their sense of control.

Wouldn't a deterministic universe free you from all possible responsibilities?

If everything is pre-determined, then what are you really responsible for?

The word Karma means action.

It is the concept of eternal cause and effect.

It has its origin in ancient India and it is the principal idea behind many Asian religions.

Karmic activity is said to be an action performed with an intention.

Reflexes and unintentional actions are not karmic activities.

Beating heart and muscle reflexes are not karmic actions, as you don't have to decide

to do that.

Imagine you are sitting still in a beautiful garden.

The garden has trees, flowers, flowing water and the songs of various birds.

You could be sitting, breathing, and just being.

You hear the songs of the birds, you notice the colors of the flower, and without any

sense of the self doing something.

The minute you think, "I am going to hear the sound of this bird", that begins the karmic activity

It is an intentional cause, and according to karma, that cause will have an effect.

Karma is said to be an eternal cause and effect, with knots interlinked, which in turn provides

all the texture and drama that we witness all around us.

But it is not as simple as it sounds.

Today I had a pizza for lunch, at a new pizza shop in the city.

I only went to that pizza shop after I saw an ad poster during my visit to the

visa processing office.

I only went to the visa processing office as I was in the process of immigrating to

another country.

I only decided to move to another country as I applied for an overseas job on LinkedIn.

Did I eat pizza for lunch today, only because I applied for that job all those months ago?

And what influenced that decision?

But one could argue that it is possible for a completely different scenario to have happened.

But the truth is, it didn't.

This was the only outcome.

If you focus on any of your decision, you would always find another previous decision

that influenced the one in focus.

So do you think you have a say in any of this?

Can you control and redirect the events in your life?

Or are you just a kid in a toy car, pretending to drive.

Some time ago, my friend casually said something while addressing free will and determinism.

He said, "you have a choice until you make a decision, after that it was always supposed

to happen that way."

It might sound like a nonsensical statement at first, but when you closely examine it,

you realize that it is not nonsensical.

It is paradoxical.

It is in line with all the other laws of paradoxes that seem to govern almost all aspects of

our reality.

We looked at this through the lens of cause consequence cycle and determinism

but what about free will?

What are its implications?

Free will is the ability to make a conscious choice at any given moment, without any external

coercion, while also accepting the responsibility for one's action.

This is where the concept of morality comes in.

According to free will, you are morally responsible for your actions.

You chose to do it, you could have prevented it, and you didn't, so you are responsible

for it.

So, what is true freedom?

Being caught in an infinite cause consequence cycle, and going through the motions, while

watching your life, like a movie without any responsibility, or consciously choosing to

do an action, and being responsible for that action and its consequence?

It doesn't seem like it was our choice to come into this world.

We didn't seem to choose our family.

We even appear to be pre disposed to behave in a certain way.

The idea of psychological archetypes was researched and advanced by the Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung

Archetype is a collectively inherited idea or a pattern of thought that is universally

present in individual psyches.

Jung divided the mind into three layers.

According to Jung, these three layers shape a person's identity.

The first one is the Conscious or the Ego world, which is formed by your direct experience

of this world through your senses like sight, sound and smell.

The next layer would be personal unconscious, which includes anything that's not blatantly

accessible to our awareness but can be.

This includes both memories that can be remembered and the painfully suppressed ones.

Then he adds a spectacularly unique world to our mind, called the collective unconscious.

It is a river of humanity's experiences; a knowledge that we are all born with.

Although we can't be conscious of it, it strongly influences our experiences, behaviours

and our relationship with our reality.

According to Jung, this collective unconscious begins even before we are born, like how the

physical organs form in the mother's womb.

The contents of this collective unconscious are called The Archetypes, and it is there

to influence how we behave in certain situations, and it stands outside of what we call reality.

The Innocent, The Caregiver, The Orphan, The Hero are some of the common ego types that

Jung describes.

But we could have endless debates about whether we are really free, or merely unconscious

actors mouthing dialogues and actions that the invisible script demands of us, but it

doesn't change the fact that we still feel in control, we feel guilty, sad, happy, proud,

and emotionally responsible for our actions.

These built in emotional responses go hand in hand in thinking that we are free, and

in turn I realize that the very construct of this reality depends upon this illusion

of freedom.

We might very well be puppets, but the whole existence depends upon us not realizing that.

For more infomation >> Is Free Will An Illusion? - Free Will vs Determinism - Duration: 10:36.

-------------------------------------------

Why Ann Coulter Thinks President Trump Is 'Failing' | NYT - Opinion - Duration: 3:25.

Obviously you and I could talk for hours about our differences

on Trump.

But that's not why I want to talk to today as you know.

In recent days you've inaugurated

the phrase "Former Trumpers."

What are Former Trumpers and why should he be terrified of them?

The Former Trumpers should keep Donald Trump awake at night.

We're the ones who didn't care about the Access Hollywood

tape.

He had absolute rock solid locked us in on support

because we thought we wouldn't be betrayed.

Finally, finally, he could sell Ivanka Trump

merchandise from the Oval Office if he would just

build the wall.

If he doesn't have us anymore –

No, that's what he should be worried about because

you play those people for suckers?

The one who stood by him through thick and thin and thought this

was finally something different.

Finally, we have a politician who's not going to lie to us.

No, Former Trumpers should put the fear of God in him.

One month into Donald Trump's presidency

you said so far I'd give him an A plus.

What was...

One month in.

So far I give him an A plus.

Well, he's turned in several more papers at this point,

and there have been some final exams and pop

quizzes. What's his grade today?

We're halfway through the semester and he's failing.

He could still get ahead.

There's still a shot for extra credit.

Let me guess: It involves a wall?

Well, don't act like I'm the nut

wanting a wall.

That was the chant at every rally.

I didn't make this up.

But let's be adults here. Was Mexico ever going

to pay for it?

His voters absolutely do not care.

He promised that as often as he promised the wall.

I know.

But it was like me giving him an A plus.

It was just a fun chant.

"And who's going to pay for it?"

I promise you.

We want a wall.

We don't care who pays for it.

So how much does he have to worry

politically about Former Trumpers?

If he doesn't change course –

No, they're never coming back.

Are you,

are you now a Former Trumper? Yes?

Look, he can still come back.

You are a temporary Former Trumper?

If he builds the wall.

He will be the emperor-god again.

You are a resurrected Trumper?

I'll throw a huge party.

He'll be, I'll start a committee

to put him on Mount Rushmore.

But right now, if I were a betting woman,

I don't think we're getting a wall.

One of the things that most stunned me

as his administration came together

was he spent so much time during the campaign railing against

Wall Street, fashioning himself as a populist.

This was the richest cabinet,

I think,

-Yep, it was.

in history.

What's driving me crazy is every time

I hear somebody's leaving,

I get excited,

and then I find out who it's being replaced with.

To just, to kind of be a little bit more complete and nuanced.

You said that, you implied that Trump

was governing so that Jared and Ivanka didn't lose

their friends in the Hamptons.

You can't hire your kids!

We don't like nepotism.

We're Americans.

This is third world behavior.

They're perfectly nice people.

So the two of them have no business

being in the advisory roles?

O.K., it was Jared's idea to fire Comey.

It was Jared's idea to hire Scaramucci.

At any point does it,

does it,

dawn on someone?

Now, every time I take this guy's advice

disaster ensues.

It doesn't seem to be hitting home.

Why? Because it's a relative.

For more infomation >> Why Ann Coulter Thinks President Trump Is 'Failing' | NYT - Opinion - Duration: 3:25.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump reportedly told aides Stormy Daniels is not his type - Duration: 5:03.

President Trump reportedly told aides Stormy Daniels is not his type

Donald Trump might not be publicly grumbling on Twitter about Stormy Daniels and her headline-making 60 Minutes interview, but behind closed doors, the president has allegedly dismissed her claims of an affair by telling people the porn star is not his type.

"Privately, the president has lobbed sharp attacks at Daniels and her media tour, calling her allegations a 'hoax' and asking confidants if the episode is hurting his poll numbers. The president even has griped to several people that Daniels is not the type of woman he finds attractive," the Post reports.

The White House did not immediately respond to PEOPLE's request for comment on the matter.

Sources at the White House also tell the outlet that Trump was one of the estimated 22 million Americans who watched Daniels' appearance on the long-running CBS news program.

In the chat, led by Anderson Cooper, Daniels gave vivid details of her alleged sexual affair with Trump — which she claims happened in 2006, months after he and wife Melania welcomed son Barron, now 12. (The White House and Trump's personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, have denied the alleged affair with Daniels).

According to the Post, Trump "personally did not think Daniels appeared credible" on 60 Minutes, and doesn't believe his base — many whom are Christian conservatives — will abandon him during the scandal, in the same way they stuck by him during theinfamous Access Hollywood tape.

Still, Trump asked White House staff if they had watched Daniels' interview, and what they thought of it.

He has been cautioned by those in his circle not to hit back at Daniels, the Postreports, which might explain his silence (save for a generic tweet against "Fake News" on Monday morning).

While Trump has reportedly claimed in private that Daniels isn't his type, Daniels (née Stephanie Clifford) stated publicly that she wasn't attracted to Trump when they had unprotected sex in Lake Tahoe in 2006.

"Would you be?" she asked in her 2011 interview with In Touch magazine, where she first spoke out about their "textbook generic" intercourse. "I was more like fascinated. I was definitely stimulated. We had a really good banter. Good conversation for a couple hours. I could tell he was nice, intelligent in conversation.".

Daniels' unedited, 5,500-word interview with In Touch weekly didn't see the light of day until recently. Though she reportedly sold her story to them for $15,000 dollars at the time, they held the piece due to threatened legal action, only publishing it earlier this year.

That's around the time news broke that Cohen, allegedly on behalf of Trump, arranged a $130,000 payment to Daniels shortly before the 2016 election so she'd keep quiet about the alleged sexual encounter.

Cohen initially denied paying Daniels for the nondisclosure agreement, but later admitted to it, calling it a "private transaction" and claiming it didn't violate any campaign finance laws. Cohen and Trump continue to deny that the affair took place.

In addition to Daniels, Trump is embroiled in allegations that he had an affair with former Playboy Playmate Karen McDougal while married to Melania in 2006. The White House has also denied that affair.

[Don't forget to SUBSCRIBE, LIKE, SHARE and COMMENT to get the latest news].

For more infomation >> President Trump reportedly told aides Stormy Daniels is not his type - Duration: 5:03.

-------------------------------------------

Author of New Book on Trump White House Says Kellyanne Conway "Is the Number One Leaker" - Duration: 3:10.

The author of a new book on President Donald Trump's administration says White

House counselor Kellyanne Conway is the "number one leaker" in the White House.

"If you wonder why there are so many leaks out of the White House,

one reason is Kellyanne is the number one leaker," said Ronald Kessler,

author of The Trump White House: Changing the Rules of the Game,

which is out on Tuesday.

The book is largely seen as a defense of Trump but he insisted in the interview

with CNN's State of the Union that "there's plenty of negative items in the book

and juicy tidbits in the book."

Kessler claims that at least once when he was interviewing Conway for the book she

"forgot that she was on record, and she started lashing into Reince Priebus," he

said, referring to the president's former chief of staff.

"She said the most mean, cutting and obviously untrue things about Reince.

And I didn't include them in the book because they were so unfair.

She also lit into Jared and Ivanka, saying that they leak against Steve Bannon."

Kessler also harshly criticizes Trump's daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared

Kushner, writing in the book that they were responsible for "the most disastrous

and foolish decisions of Trump's presidency." The problem,

according to Kessler's book is that Trump's daughter and son-in-law "had no

understanding of how the basic fundamentals of how government works,

how a campaign works, how politics works.

Most of all, they had no understanding of the political consequences of their

actions." When asked for examples of this,

Kessler said that they were the ones who pushed the firing of Comey,

which was disastrous." They also allegedly "pushed hiring Anthony Scaramucci,

who had to be the most absurd hire in the history of the White House," Kessler said.

Kessler's book also credits First Lady Melania Trump for being a

strong-behind-the-scenes force who is much more influential on Trump than people

recognize.

Kessler specifically credits her for pushing Trump to run for president.

At the end of the day, Kessler is convinced history will vindicate Trump.

"He will be seen as a great president, just like Reagan,

who was dissed by the press, based on results, the record unemployment,

getting rid of ISIS," Kessler said.

"All these tweets and controversies are going to be forgotten long- term."

The revelations about Conway comes weeks after reports that she was getting close

to accepting an offer to succeed Hope Hicks as White House communications director.

"It's becoming increasingly difficult for her to say no," a senior White House

official told the Atlantic.

Shortly after Hope Hicks announced her resignation,

Conway said on Fox News that she had "been offered that job many times."

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét