Thứ Bảy, 30 tháng 6, 2018

Waching daily Jul 1 2018

Liberals Explode Over Who Trump Is Bringing Back To White House As Chief Of Staff!

Within the Trump administration, nobody is immune to the antics and conjecture of the

press.

Especially when it comes to higher profile staff members.

One, in particular, is Hope Hicks.

She previously served as the White House Communications Director as well as the White House Director

of Strategic Communications.

While in her position she testified before Congress and served as the longest-serving

aide prior to her resignation.

Now there are talks and gossip surrounding the potential of her coming back, but only

time will tell.

The Daily Caller reported:

"Rumors of a possible Hope Hicks return to the White House didn't escape the ears

of President Trump, who on Friday avoided a direct answer but complimented his former

White House communications director.

"Oh really?"

Trump coyly responded when a reporter on Air Force One asked of Hicks could return.

"Well, I don't know.

I love Hope.

She's great.

I hope that — I've been hearing little things like that."

"I think everybody misses it," the president said before getting in a slam at the press

for their role in the turnover.

"You people exhaust a lot of people.

They come in full of life and vim and vigor and then they're exhausted, and then they

get their breath."

"Frankly, Hope is great and so are many of the other people and they went out.

But many people would like to come back.

Look, there is nothing more exciting than what we're doing."

Vanity Fair reported on Friday the Hicks is a "dark-horse" candidate to potentially

replace John Kelly as chief of staff.

"Two sources say Hicks's name is being discussed inside the White House," wrote

Vanity Fair's Gabriel Sherman.

"According to a source close to Hicks, she has told people she is open to the job if

Trump asked, but is not pursuing it.

When I reached out, she declined to comment."

While the Hill reported:

"Trump's comments en route to his golf club in Bedminster, N.J., for the weekend

came after Vanity Fair reported Friday that Hicks was being discussed as a possible replacement

for White House chief of staff John Kelly.

Hicks, who resigned from her position as White House communications director in February,

is among several names being floated for the position and she has told people she'd be

interested in the job if it was offered to her, Vanity Fair reported.

The outlet, however, noted that Hicks has said she would not pursue the role.

The report follows one from The Wall Street Journal on Thursday that said that Kelly is

expected to leave his role in the Trump administration by the end of July.

Kelly could leave his role as early as this week or after Trump returns from a scheduled

trip to Europe next month, the newspaper reported.

The White House denied the report on Thursday.

"I spoke to the president who refuted this article.

He said it is absolutely not true and that it is fake news," White House spokeswoman

Lindsay Walters told reporters.

Trump on Friday denied that he and Kelly have had a tense relationship, despite recent reports

indicating that the chief of staff has loosened his grip amid a worsening relationship with

the president.

"We have a very good relationship.

He's a wonderful man.

John Kelly, four-star, wonderful man.

Don't forget, this is a big change for him.

This has not been an easy change for him.

We have a very, very good relationship," Trump told reporters.

"That I can't tell you," Trump added when asked how long Kelly would continue to

serve in the administration.

"But I can say we've had a very good relationship, and we've achieved a lot … I like John

a lot.

I like him and I respect him."

The Journal reported that the top two candidates to replace Kelly, should he leave, are Office

of Management and Budget chief Mick Mulvaney and Vice President Pence's chief of staff,

Nick Ayers.

Hicks was one of Trump's longest-serving and closest aides before exiting the White

House earlier this year.

She previously worked for the Trump Organization before joining Trump's campaign when he

launched it in 2015.

Murmurings of Hicks being floated as a potential chief of staff comes the same week that former

Fox News executive Bill Shine reportedly accepted a position in the White House communications

shop."

Hicks worked in the White House around the same time that Anthony Scaramucci had his

10-day stint before he left which caused a lot of controversies.

Yet, she remained and continued as the steady hand in the administration.

It is clear that she is well respected by the president as well as his staff.

She would be an asset to anyone, including the administration.

If she were to return, then the press would no doubt go crazy.

However, it would be to the benefit of the American people.

For more infomation >> Liberals Explode Over Who Trump Is Bringing Back To White House As Chief Of Staff! - Duration: 4:35.

-------------------------------------------

Liberals Explode Over Who Trump Is Bringing Back To White House As Chief Of Staff! - Duration: 5:01.

For more infomation >> Liberals Explode Over Who Trump Is Bringing Back To White House As Chief Of Staff! - Duration: 5:01.

-------------------------------------------

Robert Mueller Is Hiding A Dark Secret That He Is Terrified Will Get Out - Duration: 10:40.

Robert Mueller Is Hiding A Dark Secret That He Is Terrified Will Get Out

Robert Mueller is always portrayed in the anti-Trump media as a "by the book" prosecutor

who calls it like he sees it.

But that couldn't be farther from the truth.

Mueller is hiding a dark secret that could ruin him if it go out.

Americans were stunned when Simona Mangiante – the wife of George Papadopoulos – gave

a shocking interview with the Daily Caller where she detailed the truth about her husband's

role in the Mueller investigation.

Papadopoulos pled guilty to one count of lying to the FBI about when he met with Maltese

professor Joseph Mifsud who allegedly told him the Russians had damaging material on

Hillary Clinton.

Mangiante strongly denied that Papadopoulos was involved in any sort of Russian collusion,

but she did reveal why he pled guilty to such a minor process crime.

Mueller was threatening to grind up Papadopoulos with charges of being an Israeli agent.

The Daily Caller reports,

"Mangiante also said Papadopoulos "pled guilty because [Mueller's prosecutors] threatened

to charge him with being an Israeli agent."

This is not the first time Mueller has chased the ghosts of Israeli spies.

And it is leading critics to raise an uncomfortable question about whether Mueller has a bias

against Israel.

When Mueller was the FBI Director, the Bureau concocted a plan to entrap two American Israeli

Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) lobbyists into accepting and transmitting classified

information to Israel.

The scheme involved undercover agents feeding false information that U.S. and Israeli officials

in Iraq were in life-threatening danger and the government wouldn't lift a finger to

protect them.

Keith Weissman and Steve Rosen – the two lobbyists Mueller worked to entrap – turned

around and essentially shouted the information from the rooftops and offered it to anyone

they could because they thought it was the only way to save the lives of the endangered

officials.

They even pushed the Washington Post to publish the information in the hopes it would alert

the public and force the U.S. government to take action to save lives.

The two were charged under a section of the Espionage Act—which had never before been

used to successfully prosecute private citizens.

Mueller saw the case end in disgrace when the government dropped all charges against

Weissman and Rosen after three-and-a-half years of legal battles.

That wasn't the only time Mueller saw questionable Israeli agents under every bed.

During the current Russia investigation, Mueller reportedly has dug into Trump's son-in-law,

Jared Kushner, for maneuvering the incoming administration to oppose the Obama administration's

support of a resolution condemning Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

The Mueller investigation is a train wreck.

The special counsel has uncovered no evidence of collusion, nor has he charged anyone with

a conspiracy to coordinate with a foreign power to influence the election.

Now Mueller's tactics in strong-arming Papadopoulos are forcing a closer re-examination of Mueller's

history with chasing imaginary Israeli agents.

Critics are wondering if the special counsel has an Israel problem.

What do you think?

Give us your thoughts

in the comment section.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét