Waching daily Jan 2 2018

Now, Markle must face the royal family matriarch, the Queen of England, who doesn't seem too

happy about what she's been hiding.

Ever since Prince Harry made the bold announcement he was dating Meghan Markle, royal watchers

have been eagerly counting down the days until the perennial bachelor pops the question.

When Prince Harry proposed to American "commoner" and Meghan Markle, it appeared as though fairytales

do come true.

A regular girl with a messy family dynamic and recluse father was flung into royalty

and would soon become a princess.

It seems like a real fairytale until her secrets came out.

She is having a rough week.

First, an online petition surfaced imploring Her Majesty the Queen and Prime Minister of

the United Kingdom Theresa May to prevent the American actress from "having an official

title or role in the Royal Family."

Now, Markle has received even more terrible news.

PEOPLE Magazine reports: For centuries, divorce was frowned upon by

the Church of England and members of the British royal family were forbidden — or at the

very least, strongly discouraged — from marrying someone who was divorced.

The history-shaking controversy surrounding Edward's abdication, as fans of The Crown

will attest, has never been forgotten by Queen Elizabeth, who was just 10 when her uncle

stepped aside — paving the way for her own ascension to the throne.

Edward married Simpson in 1937 in exile in France.

But times have changed.

In 2002, the General Synod – the governing body of the Church of England – voted to

recognize "that some marriages regrettably do fail."

They added, "there are exceptional circumstances in which a divorced person may be married

in church during the lifetime of a former spouse."

Any decision "as to whether or not to solemnize such a marriage in church after divorce rests

with the minister."

PEOPLE Magazine explains: In order to remain in the line of succession,

members of the royal family cannot be Catholic.

The vast majority are members of the Church of England, with the Queen serving as the

head of the church.

And until 2013, laws forbade members of the family from marrying someone who is Catholic.

It was a restriction couples could work around: Peter Phillips's wife, Autumn, converted

from Catholicism before their May 2008 wedding.

If she hadn't, Phillips — the Queen's eldest grandchild, who is 13th in line to

the throne — would have lost his place in the line of succession.

However, in 2013, Britain modernized their laws.

Now, those in the immediate line of succession can marry anyone they like, regardless of

religion (provided they have permission from the monarch if they're one of the first

six in line to the throne).

The rules regarding gender were also changed so that a first-born daughter would inherit

the throne, irrespective of whether a boy followed.

Under the previous primogeniture rule, any boy would take priority over an older sister.

Unlike with Charles and Camilla, PEOPLE understands that the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby

has no issue with conducting the ceremony for Harry and Markle – if he's asked.

"Following the guidelines of the Church of England, the Archbishop wouldn't have

any problem with officiating with their wedding if it got to that point," says a source

close to the Archbishop.

MadWorld reports: This is quite a different reaction than we saw to Kate Middleton, who

married Harry's brother William, when she became engaged.

Indeed, Kate was beloved all over the world.

She couldn't even wear a dress without it selling out within minutes.

So, what's so different about Meghan Markle?

Both girls are beautiful.

Both came from much more humble means than their spouses.

Are they really so different?

Where politics is concerned, the answer is a resounding "yes."

With regards to Kate Middleton, we really don't know where she stands politically,

and that's the way it should be; members of the Royal Family have been prohibited from

pushing a political agenda ever since the UK officially became a democracy.

Meghan, on the other hand, is a liberal extremist and makes no effort to hide it.

This could end up being incredibly controversial for the monarchy, and even worse for the British

nation, because of her vocal opposition to President Donald Trump.

What are your thoughts regarding this wedding?

Share your thoughts in the comment section below and don't forget to subscribe to get

instant news updates.

For more infomation >> BREAKING!!! Markle CAN'T Marry Prince Harry – Her Secret Is OUT! - Duration: 4:36.

-------------------------------------------

How to jump is a cool Funny hamster! - Duration: 2:10.

Thanks for subscribing to my channel!Please RT!

For more infomation >> How to jump is a cool Funny hamster! - Duration: 2:10.

-------------------------------------------

Flat Earth Theorists Say The MOON Is Flat Too - Super Moon 2018 - Duration: 2:34.

Flat earthers are making headlines again after they are claiming that the moon is also flat.

I'm going to tell you everything you need to know, here for you on IO.

What is good flat earth loving, or hating potatoes, My name is charlotte and this is

IO.

Don't forget to like and subscribe for all your trending news.

Are you ready for another flat earth conspiracy?

The recent supermoon on January first was the largest full moon of the year.

A supermoon is where the moon is at its closest to the earth so it looks huge in the sky.

A video on the youtube channel, world history official, claimed that the recent supermoon

holds proof that the moon is flat.

The video states that ancient civilizations believed both the moon and the earth are flat.

The moon is tidally locked on to the earth, meaning you only ever see one side of it,

but apparently, according to this flat earther, there is no other side to the moon.

The moon, is in fact, a subconscious projection, held up by NASA.

But wait, the bizarre claims don't stop there.

World History Official also says that theres a reflective lens or medium, 100 kilometers

above the planet that could be altering the image of the moon in the sky.

Oh, and also that the moon emits its own light, and isn't actually reflecting the suns rays.

Ok so…I'mma stop right there.

yea there are a few ancient civilizations that believed that the earth and moon were

flat discs…Like the Babylonians, indigenous americans, the ancient chinese, Indians, and

some ancient Egyptians, but those ancient civilizations never went to space.

Plus, just because someone makes a claim in a youtube video, that doesn't meant they

believe it.

I personally think that a vast majority of these flat earth videos are just hoaxes that

push crazy theories because they do well on youtube.

Youtube is where a lot of conspiracy theorists spread their information and 'proof'.

Pythagoras was one of the great minds who first proposed the earth was round, in fact,

by figuring out that the moon is round.

He showed the moon must be round by observing the shape of the terminator line which is

the line between he part of the moon in light, and the part of the moon in the dark as it

moved through its orbital cycle.

Reliqz – if the earth is flat how is rotating.

Probably the best piece of evidence that the earth is round is that there are different

times zones.

How is it possible that the sun rises in new york, 3 hours before LA?

Tae rahn – if the world was really flat, wouldn't cats have pushed everything off

the edge by now?

No truer words have ever been spoken.

Moose doose – We should make the cheapest space ship and send all the flat earthers

into space, but them not bring them back, just stream their reaction.

You are evil and I like that That is all for this video, thanks for watching,

if you enjoyed it, you'll also like this one over here.

Flat earth believers have shocking evidence against nasa.

Click it and I'll see you in that video.