Thứ Năm, 2 tháng 11, 2017

Waching daily Nov 2 2017

Learn colors for kids - Color truck, Color fruit with spiderman - Nursery rhymes for children

For more infomation >> Learn colors for kids - Color truck, Color fruit with spiderman - Nursery rhymes for children - Duration: 12:21.

-------------------------------------------

Baby Kids takes Lollipops & Crying for Tantrum & Learn Colors with Finger Family Song Nursery Rhymes - Duration: 3:47.

Baby Kids takes Lollipops & Crying for Tantrum & Learn Colors with Finger Family Song Nursery Rhymes

For more infomation >> Baby Kids takes Lollipops & Crying for Tantrum & Learn Colors with Finger Family Song Nursery Rhymes - Duration: 3:47.

-------------------------------------------

Mila Kunis Bailed on World Series Game 7 for James - Duration: 4:43.

For more infomation >> Mila Kunis Bailed on World Series Game 7 for James - Duration: 4:43.

-------------------------------------------

Guest Host Channing Tatum Asks Kids for Advice - Duration: 4:00.

For more infomation >> Guest Host Channing Tatum Asks Kids for Advice - Duration: 4:00.

-------------------------------------------

Trump's Name For His Tax Bill Is So... Trumpy - Duration: 4:53.

For more infomation >> Trump's Name For His Tax Bill Is So... Trumpy - Duration: 4:53.

-------------------------------------------

Woody Harrelson Asked Bryan Cranston for Help - Duration: 4:04.

For more infomation >> Woody Harrelson Asked Bryan Cranston for Help - Duration: 4:04.

-------------------------------------------

Kenneth Branagh's Plan for Hand & Footprint Ceremony - Duration: 3:22.

For more infomation >> Kenneth Branagh's Plan for Hand & Footprint Ceremony - Duration: 3:22.

-------------------------------------------

Commercial for Captain Morgan with Guillermo - Duration: 1:27.

For more infomation >> Commercial for Captain Morgan with Guillermo - Duration: 1:27.

-------------------------------------------

Congress Made It Easier For Big Banks To Steal From You - Duration: 7:54.

LATE LAST NIGHT THE REPUBLICANS IN THE SENATE VOTED

TO GIVE BANKS CREDIT CARD COMPANIES, EVEN COMPANIES LIKE

APPLE FAX BROAD IMMUNITY FROM LAWSUITS FROM PEOPLE LIKE

YOU BLOCKING A SEEM TO BE IN LIMITED ROLE THAT CAME OUT

OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU.

YOU MIGHT ASK WITH COMPANIES LIKE BANKS AND CREDIT CARD

COMPANIES AND ALL OF THAT WHAT YOU MEAN RESTORE THE RIGHT

TO SUE.

WHAT YOU GENERALLY HAVE TO GO THROUGH THANKS TO THE TERMS OF

SERVICE IS THROUGH ARBITRATION WHICH IS LIKE A LAWSUIT BUT

ALMOST ENTIRELY UNDER THE CONTROL OF THAT CORPORATION.

YOUR ABILITY TO BAND TOGETHER WITH OTHER PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN

WRONGED BY THE CORPORATION IS ELIMINATED IN THAT CASE AND

YOUR ABILITY TO GET SOMETHING FOR WHAT HAS BEEN DONE TO

YOU IS EFFECTIVELY NIL.

WE WERE GOING TO HAVE THAT, BUT NOW WE DON'T THANKS TO

REPUBLICANS.

AND JUST FOR THE RECORD IF YOU'RE LOOKING FOR DEFIANCE

AGAINST TRUMP AND HIS AGENDA ALL BUT TWO REPUBLICANS VOTED

TO REPEAL THE RULE.

LET'S BREAK THIS DOWN A COUPLE OF WAYS, TO YOUR LAST

POINT ABOUT HEROES OF THE RESISTANCE FROM THE RIGHT WING,

JEFF FLAKE WHERE ARE YOU?

I THOUGHT YOU WERE FIGHTING TRUMP.

CORKER WHERE ARE YOU?

IT GOES TO THE POINT OF THEY ARE LOOKING TO ROB YOU.

GUYS LIKE CORKER AND MCCAIN, THEY HAVE HEARD FROM PEOPLE

INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE AND SEEN IT WITH THEIR OWN EYES, THE GUY

IS A TOTAL BUFFOON AND COMPLETELY DANGEROUS.

AT ANY MOMENT HE COULD START A WAR AND EVEN JOHN MCCAIN.

LET'S GO BACK TO THIS ISSUE AND WHAT THIS IS.

LET ME BREAK DOWN FOR YOU THE GIGANTIC DIFFERENCE THAT

THIS MAKES.

WHEN THESE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, AND IT

APPLIES TO OTHER COMPANIES ALSO.

BECAUSE NOW EVERYTHING IS FORCED INTO ARBITRATION BECAUSE THE

SUPREME COURT IS ALSO CORPORATIST.

IT IS A LONG STORY I CAN GET INTO BUT ANYWAY ñ

THEY MADE THE DECISION IN 2011, 2013.

IN 2009 THERE ARE SOME CLASS-ACTION LAWSUITS OUT

THERE, BUT ESPECIALLY FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS THEY

ARE NOW FAR MORE LIMITED.

BACK WHEN THEY EXISTED PEOPLE FOUND OUT THAT BANKS WERE

RIPPING YOU OFF ON OVERDRAFTS.

THEY DID THAT SYSTEMATICALLY AND TO THE TUNE OF BILLIONS OF

DOLLARS.

THEY WOULD JUST TAKE FROM YOU FIVE BUCKS AT A TIME, 20 BUCKS

AT A TIME.

THEY KNEW WAS WRONG BUT THEY DID IT ANYWAY.

IT IS GREAT THAT WE CAUGHT THEM ON IT.

WE WERE RIGHT AND THEY DID A CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT, PUT

DOWN A BUNCH OF PEOPLE TOGETHER AND SAID YOU DID IT TO ALL

OF US AND $1 BILLION WAS RETURNED TO CONSUMERS.

THE PEOPLE WHO WERE RIPPED OFF.

MORE SHOULD'VE BEEN RETURNED BUT THAT IS STILL GREAT, YOU

GOTTA BILLION BACK TO CONSUMERS WHO WERE LITERALLY ROBBED.

IT WAS DECIDED BY THE COURTS, THEY WERE ROBBED AND THEY

GOTTA BILLION DOLLARS BACK.

NOW CLASS-ACTION LAWSUITS ARE NOT ALLOWED FOR MOST OF THOSE

ISSUES SO THEY DID A TWO-YEAR STUDY IN ARBITRATION CLAIMS.

THE PROBLEM WITH ARBITRATION IS IT IS STACKED AGAINST YOU

IN TWO WAYS.

YOU CAN'T BAND TOGETHER WITH EVERYBODY SEE YOU CAN'T

AFFORD A LAWYER.

LET ALONE A DRAGGED OUT LONG LAWSUIT.

NUMBER TWO, THE LAWYERS USED IN ARBITRATION USUALLY WORK FOR

CORPORATIONS.

THEY ARE NOT BAD PEOPLE THAT YOU

ARE UNLIKELY TO HIRE THEM.

SO THAT IS ANOTHER INSTITUTIONAL

PROBLEM.

SO WHAT HAPPENS?

IN THOSE TWO YEARS THEY WERE 78 ARBITRATION

CLAIMS THAT FOUND IN FAVOR OF THE CONSUMERS WHICH IS

PREPOSTEROUSLY LOW.

TO THE TUNE OF $400,000.

IN ONE CASE ALONE, THEY SAID WE DON'T LIKE CORPORATIONS, WE

WILL GIVE THEM MORE POWER.

BEFORE THAT YOU HAD $1 BILLION RETURN TO CONSUMERS.

AFTERWARDS $400,000 TO 78 CASES.

THIS IS HOW THEY REDISTRIBUTE THE WEALTH.

THIS ALLOWS FOR THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO

SYSTEMICALLY RIP YOU OFF AND GET AWAY WITH IT.

AND REPUBLICANS LOVE IT, THAT IS THEIR MAIN MODUS OPERANDI.

JUST

TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF HOW BRAZEN THEY ARE ñ IF THIS

RULE HAD GONE INTO EFFECT AND YOU HAD WANTED TO TAKE SOME SORT

OF LEGAL ACTION YOU WOULD HAD A COUPLE OF ACTIONS.

YOU COULD GO THROUGH ARBITRATION OR DO A CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT.

THEY HAVE TAKEN AWAY ONE OF THOSE TWO THINGS AND THEIR

MESSAGING AS TO WHY IS TO INCREASE FREEDOM AND CHOICE.

THEY

ARE BRAZEN ABOUT IT BECAUSE THEY THINK IT DOESN'T MATTER.

I HOPE THE INTERNET HAS BEGUN THE FIX THAT BECAUSE NOW WE

ARE ON TO THEM AND AT LEAST YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO YOU.

YOUR CHOICE, IF YOU LIKE BEING ROBBED BY YOUR BANK VOTE

REPUBLICAN.

For more infomation >> Congress Made It Easier For Big Banks To Steal From You - Duration: 7:54.

-------------------------------------------

'Tis The Season For Treason: A Very Mueller Christmas - Duration: 9:36.

For more infomation >> 'Tis The Season For Treason: A Very Mueller Christmas - Duration: 9:36.

-------------------------------------------

Haley Bennett on New Film Thank You for Your Service - Duration: 1:35.

For more infomation >> Haley Bennett on New Film Thank You for Your Service - Duration: 1:35.

-------------------------------------------

Millions of Chinese children fend for themselves when parents must follow work far away - Duration: 8:53.

JUDY WOODRUFF: When Chinese President Xi Jinping marked the beginning of a new five-year term

last week, he spoke of a China focused on common prosperity, a nation where no one must

be left behind.

But while reaching that ambitious goal, there are millions of children in China who must

often fend for themselves, as their parents move to China's cities to find work.

In partnership with the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting, special correspondent Max

Duncan reports from Liangshan, China.

MAX DUNCAN: Deep in the mountains of Southwest China, three children are used to being by

themselves.

Their parents are nowhere in sight, but the siblings are not orphans.

They're among an estimated nine million minors left behind in the Chinese countryside by

parents who work far away in wealthier cities.

They see their parents a couple of times a year.

Twelve-year-old Wang Bing is the most outgoing and loves to read.

WANG BING, 12 Years Old (through translator): I think my sister is very brave.

My brother is quite naughty.

We know how to take care of ourselves here.

MAX DUNCAN: The children stay in their school dormitory during the week.

On weekends and school holidays, they often cook and wash for themselves.

WANG BING (through translator): My parents are working in Guangdong Province.

I don't know what they do.

They don't tell me.

It's boring here, just us three children.

I miss them.

MAX DUNCAN: Most so-called left-behind children rely on grandparents, but not all can provide

the care needed.

These children's maternal grandmother lives a 40-minute walk away along a mountain path.

Sometimes, she comes to help with the farmwork and keep an eye on them, but she has other

fields to tend and younger grandchildren to look after.

In such cases, older girls often take on the role of mother.

Fourteen-year-old Wang Ying resents the burden placed on her, and refuses to speak to her

parents on the phone.

She finds it too upsetting.

WANG YING, 14 Years Old (through translator): I'm the only one who's grown up.

I have to do the farmwork, and I have to study too.

When my brother and sister don't do what I tell them, I miss my mom and dad.

And when the farmwork is too hard for me, I miss my mom and dad.

And, sometimes, the teacher tells me off when I don't know the answer.

Then I really miss my mom and dad.

MAX DUNCAN: The walk to school takes an hour.

The family are from the Yi, one of China's largest ethnic minority groups.

Under China's complex one-child policy, which ended in 2015, rural residents and ethnic

minorities were allowed to have more than one child.

Liangshan, where they live, is one of China's poorest areas.

There's little meaningful work their parents could have done here.

Surveys show that growing up without parents can lead to a raft of developmental problems.

Ron Pouwels is UNICEF China's head of child protection.

RON POUWELS, UNICEF China: It can lead to psychological problems.

It could lead to behavior problems.

We know that children who are left behind do less well in school.

And, yes, all these things have, of course, an impact on the later adult life of children.

MAX DUNCAN: Over 1,000 miles southeast of Liangshan lies Huizhou, a city of almost five

million people in China's manufacturing belt.

And it's where the children's parents work.

They make headphones and cables in a factory with hundreds of other workers from rural

areas.

For an 11-hour day, they earn around 15 U.S. dollars each.

The couple are illiterate and speak little Mandarin, China's official language, so they

are determined that their children will have a better chance than they did.

JIAJIA, Mother (through translator): The two of us understand too well the curse of illiteracy.

So long as the children don't give up, we must support their study.

MAX DUNCAN: China's economic explosion has drawn an estimated 200 million laborers like

them from the countryside.

But with wages rising fast, factories like theirs are now turning to workers from poorer

areas who will still accept low wages.

The children's mother, Jiajia, constantly questions whether leaving was the right decision.

JIAJIA (through translator): I worry the kids will get cold in the wind and rain, or that

a stranger will come to the house.

I heard rumors of people stealing children's organs.

I was so worried, I couldn't sleep.

MAX DUNCAN: The plight of left-behind children has come to the forefront of public debate

in China after several unsupervised children died in another poor region in 2015.

Some blame China's household registration system, which controls population movement

by allowing people free public services like education and health care in the place where

they were born, but not in the cities they move to.

Authorities are reforming the system, but change has been slower in some big cities,

where bringing up children is also more expensive.

Concerned about neglected children, the government is introducing more social workers to rural

areas.

And they are also considering tougher measures.

A new way that the authorities hope to tackle the problem is by punishing absent parents

for neglecting those children.

But many people are asking, until those parents are either allowed to bring their children

with them or can find well-paid work closer to home, what choice do they really have?

Wang Zhenyao is a former official with China's Ministry of Civil Affairs.

He supports a proposed law which would criminally charge parents who leave children without

proper supervision for more than six months.

WANG ZHENYAO, Former Official, Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs (through translator): We

need to put some pressure on young parents, make them legally and socially responsible.

That way, we can first set rules for the care of left-behind children starting at the most

basic family level.

MAX DUNCAN: Back in Southwest China, it's summer holidays, and the children visit their

paternal grandparents, who live in an even more remote area five hours' travel away.

It's also the time for the torch festival, the most important celebration in the Yi minority's

calendar.

At night, the children light torches, traditionally to scare away pests that damage crops.

While their parents' absence is conspicuous, Wang Bing is happy to be with the wider family.

WANG BING (through translator): Mom and dad aren't here, but grandma and grandpa are here,

so I really enjoy it, because grandma and grandpa are just like a mom and dad to me.

They're really great.

MAX DUNCAN: Meanwhile, their mother, who has been worried about them, has decided to come

back to take care of them, leaving her husband to earn money.

To get back, she takes a 36-hour bus with other Yi workers.

It's then a two-hour uphill walk from the road to the grandparents' house.

She finds the children up a hill, where they have been farming.

The sweets go down well with the younger children and their cousins.

But elder sister Wang Ying is reticent, and initially speaks little to her mother.

JIAJIA (through translator): I haven't seen the children in months, and they're very naughty.

They're all bigger, but they're wilder.

Children without parents are different to those with parents at home.

They haven't been keeping clean.

They're very messy.

MAX DUNCAN: Her mother's return means some of the weight is lifted from Wang Ying's shoulders,

and she's happy to slack off.

WANG YING (through translator): Now that mom has come back, I don't have to look after

my brother and sister anymore, and I don't have to do as much farmwork as I used to.

MAX DUNCAN: But the future is far from clear.

The family will struggle to subsist on one income alone.

JIAJIA (through translator): I don't want to leave the children again to live like orphans.

But if we can't afford to live, I would have no choice but to go back out to work.

MAX DUNCAN: At least for the time being, Wang Ying is a little freer to be what she ultimately

still is, a child.

For the "PBS NewsHour," I'm Max Duncan in Liangshan, China.

For more infomation >> Millions of Chinese children fend for themselves when parents must follow work far away - Duration: 8:53.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Tax Reform Coming For Your 401(k) - Duration: 5:54.

IF YOU ARE NOT ALREADY TERRIFIED BY WHAT TRUMP AND THE GOP'S

UPCOMING TAX POLICY CHANGES WILL DO TO YOU AND THE COUNTRY

WAIT UNTIL YOU FIND OUT WHAT THEY MIGHT DO TO YOUR 401(K),

ONE OF THE THINGS YOU AS AN INDIVIDUAL CAN ACTUALLY

RELY ON OVER THE COURSE OF YOUR LIFE IF YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE

AND SAFE TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE NOT DESTITUTE AND ON THE STREET.

YOU MIGHT HAVE READ THAT DONALD TRUMP IS A BIG FAN OF KEEPING

401(K)S THE WAY IT IS.

HE IMMEDIATELY CHANGED HIS MIND WITHIN 24 HOURS.

HE IS NOW SAYING HE IS OPEN TO POSSIBLY NEGOTIATING TO

CHANGE THAT.

SO TRUMP IS WILLING TO NEGOTIATE ON THAT JUST TWO DAYS AFTER

SAYING THAT HE WOULDN'T.

THIS IS NOT OUT OF TRUMP, THIS IS OUT OF SOME OF THE

REPUBLICANS THAT KNOW SOME OF THE DETAILS.

FOR A LOT OF AMERICANS THEY CAN PUT 18,000 IN, BUT IT SURE

WOULD BE NICE TO BE ABLE TO HAVE YOUR INCOME ROSE AT SOME POINT.

THAT IS MASSIVELY LOWERING IT DOWN, THAT MEANS YOU DON'T

BENEFIT FROM THE TAX SAVINGS OF THAT ADDITIONAL $16,000.

LET'S BREAK THIS DOWN.

KEVIN BRADY SAID YOU CAN CREATE INCENTIVES.

YOU JUST DID THE EXACT OPPOSITE.

THEY COULD'VE SAVED MORE AND SOONER IF YOU ALLOW THEM TO PUT

MORE INTO THEIR 401(K) TAX-FREE.

THAT WOULD'VE CREATED AN INCENTIVE TO SAVE MORE FASTER.

YOU DID THE EXACT OPPOSITE.

YOU SAID YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PUT THAT MUCH INTO YOUR

401(K) ANYMORE.

DO YOU KNOW WHAT THIS DOES?

INCREASES TAXES ON THE MIDDLE CLASS.

THEY HAVE TO GET THE MONEY SOMEWHERE.

THEY ARE ABOUT TO GIVE A COUPLE TRILLION TO THE RICH.

THEY HAVE TO GIVES THE MONEY TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO

FINANCE WARS AND EVERYTHING ELSE THEY WANT TO DO.

WHERE ARE WE GOING TO GET IT FROM?

LET'S GO RUB THE MIDDLE CLASS AND THEN DO A BRAZEN LIE

WHERE WE SAY THE EXACT OPPOSITE.

THAT IS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY FOR YOU.

I HAVE THE STORY TEED UP, THE 401(K)

STORY ON MONDAY, AND WE COULDN'T GET TO IT.

I WISH WE HAD BECAUSE I HAD TRUMP'S TWEET ABOUT WHERE HE

SAID THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE TO YOUR 401(K).

THAT WAS HIS SWEET AND I WAS GOING TO SAY THAT IS GREAT,

AND THEN HE CHANGED HIS MIND.

BUT I'M TRUMP THE REASON I WAS GOING TO SAY THAT IS

BECAUSE IT IS WHOEVER WAS IN THE ROOM LAST.

MAYBE STEVE BANNON ñ HE CALLS THEM UP AND SAYS LET'S GIVE IT

TO THE MIDDLE CLASS OR SOMETHING.

I KNEW MCCONNELL WAS GOING TO COME IN NEXT AND SAY HEY IDIOT

THE PEOPLE WHO DONATED TO YOU AND WHO YOU WORK FOR WANT TO

SCREW THE MIDDLE CLASS.

WE ARE REALLY IN A CRAPPY

POSITION BECAUSE WE ARE

STUCK BETWEEN THE DESIRE OF REPUBLICANS TO TAKE EXTRA

MONEY FROM YOU SO THEY CAN GIVE IT TO THE RICH AND THE CONCERNS

THEY HAVE FOR THEIR DONORS SOME OF WHOM WORK IN INDUSTRIES

THAT WOULD USE THE MONEY YOU ARE PUTTING IN YOUR 401(K)

TO MAKE INVESTMENTS AND THEY CAN GENERATE MONEY OFF OF THAT.

I DON'T KNOW IF THE INDIVIDUAL RICH PEOPLE OR THE COMPANIES

WILL BENEFIT.

THE PEOPLE WHO BENEFIT FROM THE 401(K)S,

COMPANIES, WILL FIGHT BACK AGAINST US.

NOW I GET TO DO A PREDICTION.

TRUMBULL FLIP-FLOP ON THIS FOUR TIMES.

401 TIMES.

LITERALLY FOUR TIMES BECAUSE DIFFERENT LOBBYISTS AND

FINANCIAL INTERESTS WILL COME INTO THE ROOM.

THE MOST IMPORTANT PART IS THE HOUSE MEANS COMMITTEE IS SUPER

IMPORTANT, THEY ARE THE ONES THAT CONTROL ALL THE MONEY AND

REPUBLICANS WHO CONTROL THAT ARE SAYING WE NEVER MEANT

MIDDLE-CLASS TAX CUTS.

IN FACT WE MEANT MIDDLE-CLASS TAX INCREASES YOU IDIOTS.

TEXT CUTS ARE FOR THE RICH, THAT IS WHAT KEVIN BRADY AND ALL

OF THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS ARE SAYING.

For more infomation >> Trump Tax Reform Coming For Your 401(k) - Duration: 5:54.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Takes Credit For Releasing The JFK Files - Duration: 5:14.

For more infomation >> Trump Takes Credit For Releasing The JFK Files - Duration: 5:14.

-------------------------------------------

Chuck Schumer: Trump Cut Funding For Anti-Terrorism Program - Duration: 4:27.

TRUMP

ATTACKED NOT ONLY THE DIVERSITY VISA BUT DEMOCRATIC SEN.,

CHUCK SCHUMER SPECIFICALLY.

CHUCK SCHUMER RESPONDED BOTH ON SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE SENATE

FLOOR.

THEN HE WENT ON TO SAY THIS.

I HAVE ALWAYS BELIEVED THAT IMMIGRATION IS GOOD FOR

AMERICA, I BELIEVE IT TODAY.

PRESIDENT TRUMP INSTEAD OF POLITICIZING AND DIVIDING

AMERICA, WHICH HE ALWAYS SEEMS TO DO AT TIMES OF NATIONAL

TRAGEDY SHOULD BE BRINGING US TOGETHER AND FOCUSING ON THE

REAL SOLUTION, ANTI-TERRORISM FUNDING WHICH SHE PROPOSED

TO CUT IN HIS MOST RECENT BUDGET.

SO I AM CALLING ON THE PRESIDENT TO RESCIND HIS PROPOSED

CUTS TO HIS VITAL ANTITERRORISM FUNDING IMMEDIATELY.

A GREAT EXAMPLE OF THE SORT OF THING THAT FOR WHATEVER

REASON WILL NOT REACH 32% OF THIS COUNTRY.

THAT HE LITERALLY CUT THE FUNDING FOR THESE SORTS OF

ANTITERRORISM INVESTIGATIONS.

IF YOU ASK HIS CAR, THEY WILL SAY HE IS THE ONLY ONE WHO

WILL DEFEND US AS HE LITERALLY TAKES THE MONEY AWAY TO

GIVE IT TO BILLIONAIRES.

TOMORROW HE SHOULD GO ON CNN, MSNBC AND SAY IT AGAIN.

AND ON FRIDAY DO IT AGAIN AND ON SUNDAY DO IT AGAIN.

AND HOLD A PIECE OF PAPER THAT SHOWS THAT.

AND SAY IT AGAIN FOR THE NEXT TWO MONTHS SO THEY SAY CHUCK

SCHUMER WOULD STOP TALKING ABOUT THIS ANTITERRORISM THING THAT

DONALD TRUMP KEEPS CUTTING OUT OF HIS BUDGET.

WHAT IS IN IT AGAIN?

THE ANTITERRORISM PROGRAM THAT YOU KEEP CUTTING.

I'VE BEEN LISTENING TO A LOT OF TALK LIVE RADIO LATELY BECAUSE

OF THE BASEBALL WORLD SERIES AND THERE ARE ADS THAT RUN THAT THEY

CONTACT US, JOHN PLUMMER.COM.

MY KIDS ARE IN THE BACKSEAT SAYING WHY IS HE SAYING THIS

100 TIMES?

AND I SAID SO YOU NEVER FORGET IT.

SAME THING, JUST DO IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

THAT MIGHT NOT WORK WITH YOU BECAUSE I'M PRETTY SURE ONE

800 JOHN PLUMMER.COM IS NOT THE RIGHT THING.

IF YOU CAN SET HE IS CUTTING ANTI- TERRORISM FUNDS TO

THAT CARS FOR KIDS SOON, I DON'T THINK YOU WILL GET PAST IT.

YOU MIGHT BE THINKING ESPECIALLY IF YOU HAVE A

MAGA GUY, I THOUGHT WE REALLY DIDN'T WANT TO FIGHT THE

TERRORISTS AND THE BAD GUYS.

AT A MINIMUM TO WE ALL HATE MUSLIMS TOGETHER?

SO WHY ARE

THEY DOING THAT?

AND WHY DO THEY ADDED $70 BILLION TO THE DEFENSE

BUDGET WHICH IS ALREADY GARGANTUAN?

THE DEFENSE BUDGET

GOES TOWARDS DEFENSE CONTRACTORS SO THEY MAKE REALLY EXPENSIVE

PLANES THAT WE OFTEN DON'T USE.

THAT IS CRONY CAPITALISM.

FIGHTING TERRORISM IS EXPENSIVE BUT MAYBE DOESN'T GO TO THE

RIGHT PLACES.

AND WHY DO THEY HAVE TO KEEP CUTTING THE BUDGET?

BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO FINANCE THE TAX CUTS.

TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH ARE A WAY A HIGHER PRIORITY FOR TRUMP

AND HIS ADMINISTRATION THAN FIGHTING TERRORISM.

THAT IS WHAT HE CUT THOSE FUNDS.

HE FIGURES IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT I CUT AND WHAT I

ACTUALLY DO.

I AM JUST GOING TO SAY ON TWITTER HOW WE HAVE TO DO

EXTREME VETTING.

I DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT, I JUST HAVE

TO SAY I MY KNUCKLEHEAD GUYS, I THINK THE RED HATS PREVENT

THE NEURONS FROM FIRING INSIDE THE HAT.

I'LL HAVE TO DO IS SCREAM ABOUT IT ON TWITTER

AND IT WILL

BE GOOD ENOUGH.

For more infomation >> Chuck Schumer: Trump Cut Funding For Anti-Terrorism Program - Duration: 4:27.

-------------------------------------------

What Xi Jinping's power play means for U.S.-China relations - Duration: 5:13.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Over the past week, China's Communist Party has gathered for its once-every-five-year

Congress in Beijing, usually focused on policy.

It also chooses both the country's leader and his successor.

But, this year, there was a twist.

John Yang has the story.

JOHN YANG: Thanks, Judy.

Chinese President Xi Jinping is solidifying his grip on power.

Today, when he introduced new members of the so-called Standing Committee, the most powerful

group in the country, there was no successor to Xi identified.

Yesterday, Xi's doctrine was enshrined in the constitution.

That elevates him to the same status as modern China's founding communist leader, Mao Zedong.

For a look at what this means for China, the United States, and beyond, we're joined by

Christopher Johnson, who served for almost two decades as a China analyst at the CIA.

He's now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Mr. Johnson, welcome.

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, Center for Strategic and International Studies: Thank you.

JOHN YANG: This all happens, of course, just two weeks before President Trump will be in

China to meet with President Xi.

What are the implications for U.S.-China relations in all of this?

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: I think the most important development is now Xi Jinping has demonstrated

that he is the unquestioned ruler in China.

And what has been striking about the bilateral relationship really since President Trump

came into power is the two men have been actually running the relationship.

The U.S. government is not fully staffed yet, as we have seen, and the president has occasionally

undermined his own secretary of state and other officials through tweeting and so on.

And so we see the two presidents, largely running the relationship.

Xi is now ready to welcome President Trump all the more powerful.

JOHN YANG: And in his 3.5-hour speech to the Party Congress last week, President Xi talked

about the great rejuvenation.

He wants to make China a global power...

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: Right.

JOHN YANG: ... at a time when President Trump is pulling away the U.S. influence on the

global stage.

How is that going to play?

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: Well, it will be interesting to watch.

There's no doubt that President Xi sees opportunity in President Trump's isolationism, as some

would put it.

Right from the beginning, when the president was elected, there's a reason why Xi Jinping

went to the Davos summit and talked about China's role increasingly as a defender of

global rules and norms and multinationalism and climate change and global agenda.

This doesn't ring true when you look at it on the surface, but if the U.S. is pulling

back, and China sees an opportunity, they are stepping into that vacuum.

And Xi Jinping is telling us, China not only expects to be a global power.

They are already one and will start acting like one.

JOHN YANG: Is there anything that happened in the Party Congress that concerns you about

U.S.-China relations?

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: You know, one of the things I think is potentially important is,

Xi Jinping made a point of talking about this island building that they have doing in the

South China Sea.

Now, this is typically something where China has conducted this activity, but not wanted

to draw attention to it.

Xi Jinping talked proudly about it in his speech.

This can be a dog whistle, if you will, for conservative elements here in the United States

who believe that China is eagerly trying to push the United States out of the region.

JOHN YANG: And you mentioned that the -- that President Xi talks about multinational trading

systems.

And he also talks about climate change, both areas where President Trump is pulling away.

Are there areas of possible cooperation between the United States and China?

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: I think the main area to look at is the economic relationship.

President Trump is sure to tell President Xi, I need more help on the trade balance

issue, and if you don't help me, I'm going to come after you through trade penalties

and remedies.

Xi Jinping has an opportunity.

He's signaling a desire to slow down China's economy.

This will be good for the United States and the globe, in that concerns about a Chinese

financial crisis that could cause us all a lot of trouble could be modified.

JOHN YANG: Will this have any impact on Mr. Trump's desire to get China to help him with

North Korea?

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: I think he will seek to indicate to Xi Jinping, OK, you have all

the power now.

Why don't you help me more on this issue?

There's been a sort of narrative in the past that Xi Jinping or any other Chinese leader

on North Korea has been constrained by hard-line influences in the military who remember fondly

China's support for North Korea and in the Korean war.

If Xi Jinping is really as powerful as he says, there should be nothing standing in

his way of being more supportive on the North Korea issue.

So, the real question is, does Xi Jinping himself want to help the United States on

the issue?

JOHN YANG: Briefly, as Xi consolidates his power, as he did at the Party Congress, are

we moving toward sort of a cult of personality like Mao?

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: I don't think so.

There's been a lot of debate about this, whether Xi Jinping is a power-mad megalomaniac like

Mao Zedong.

I think he's a pragmatist, and he has demonstrated that several times.

He doesn't look like someone who wants to cling on to power forever, and he's not been

someone who has acted in a whimsical way, like Mao.

Xi Jinping has a plan, and we have been watching him steadily execute it over the last five

years, and he will continue to do so going forward.

JOHN YANG: Christopher Johnson, thanks for joining us to help us understand all of this.

CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: My pleasure.

For more infomation >> What Xi Jinping's power play means for U.S.-China relations - Duration: 5:13.

-------------------------------------------

John Kelly Lies To Cover For Trump - Duration: 12:50.

WE ARE SEVERAL DAYS INTO THIS INSANE FEUD THAT HAS DEVELOPED

OUT OF THE MILITARY SITUATION IN NIGER A COUPLE WEEKS AGO, IT'S

GONE THROUGH MULTIPLE ITERATIONS AND THE LATEST ONE WE ARE ON IS

THERE'S A CONCERTED EFFORT COMING OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE TO

DISCREDIT THE CONGRESSWOMAN, FREDERICA WILSON, BECAUSE SHE

HAPPENED TO BE PRESENT FOR A PRESIDENTIAL PHONE CALL TO THE

WIDOW OF A SOLDIER SLAIN IN THE FIELD.

AND THE WILLINGNESS TO

PLAY FAST AND LOOSE ABOUT FACTS WITH BEACHES THAT HAVE BEEN

GIVEN COMING NOT JUST FROM DONALD TRUMP WHERE WE WOULD

EXPECT IT BUT OUT OF GENERALS LIKE JOHN KELLY IS CERTAINLY

DISAPPOINTING, SO WE WILL SHOW HOW THE MOST RECENT ATTACK BY

JOHN KELLY DURING HIS EMOTIONAL SPEECH YESTERDAY ABOUT WHAT IT'S

LIKE TO BE A FATHER WHO HAS LOST A SOLDIER IN COMBAT, WE WILL

BREAK DOWN SOME OF THE MISTRUTHS THAT WERE SPREAD.

BUT IN CASE YOU DIDN'T SEE IT HERE IS JOHN KELLY.

>>THE CONGRESSWOMAN STOOD UP, AND IN THE LONG TRADITION OF

EMPTY BARRELS MAKING THE MOST NOISE, SHE TALKED ABOUT HOW SHE

WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN GETTING THE FUNDING FOR THAT BUILDING, AND

HOW SHE CALLED THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA AND HE GAVE HER THE MONEY

TO BUILD THAT BUILDING, AND SHE SAT DOWN.

WE WERE STUNNED,

STUNNED, THAT SHE HAD DONE IT.

EVEN FOR SOMEONE THAT IS THAT

EMPTY A BARREL, WE WERE STUNNED.

BUT NONE OF US WENT TO THE PRESS

AND CRITICIZED.

NONE OF US STOOD UP AND WERE APPALLED.

WE JUST SAID OKAY, FINE.

>> THAT'S A TOTALLY ORGANIC NOT PLANNED NARRATIVE WHEN YOU USE

THE EXPRESSION EMPTY BARREL THREE TIMES IN A MINUTE.

ALSO

SAYING STUNNED SHE WOULD LISTEN IN ON THE CALL.

THERE'S A

COMPLETE LACK OF INTEREST IN ACTUALLY UNDERSTANDING THE

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THIS CONGRESSWOMAN AND NOT JUST THE

WIDOW BUT THE SOLDIER WHO WAS KILLED, IT WOULD ALLOW YOU TO

UNDERSTAND WHY THIS PLAYED OUT THE WAY IT DID THAT THEN WE WILL

GET TO THE SUBSTANCE, WE WILL PLAY THE SPEECH THAT SHOWS HOW

WRONG HE WAS, BUT THERE IS THIS INABILITY IN THE WHITE HOUSE TO

UNDERSTAND WHEN YOU'VE MADE A LITTLE ERROR AND SIMPLY KILL IT

JUST BY APOLOGIZING, MOVING ON, THEY HAVE TO DOUBLE DOWN AND

DONALD TRUMP'S NEED TO DO THAT DRAWS IN PEOPLE LIKE JOHN KELLY

INTO GIVING A SPEECH LIKE THAT THAT I'M SURE HE HAD NO INTEREST

IN GIVING.

BUT HE SAYS THAT SHE'S AN EMPTY BARREL,

GRANDSTANDING, APPARENTLY THIS RECENT SITUATION IS JUST AN

EXAMPLE BECAUSE YOU CAN GO BACK AND SEE OTHER EXAMPLES LIKE WHEN

SHE TOOK CREDIT FOR THIS FBI BUILDING.

HERE IS THE ACTUAL SPEECH SHE GAVE THAT SHE WAS ALLUDING TO.

>> THE BRAND-NEW FEDERAL BUILDING THAT WILL HOUSE THE FBI

HAS BEEN BUILT, AND THE FBI APPROACHES MY OFFICE.

CONGRESSWOMAN WILSON THE RIBBON-CUTTING IS SCHEDULED IN

FOUR SHORT WEEKS, THE DEDICATION IS ON THE GOVERNMENT'S CALENDAR

AND CANNOT BE CHANGED.

ONE PROBLEM, THE FBI WANTS TO NAME

THIS GORGES EDIFICE AT THE SAME TIME IN FOUR WEEKS.

EVERYONE

SAID THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE.

IT TAKES AT LEAST EIGHT MONTHS TO A YEAR

TO COMPLETE THE PROCESS THROUGH THE HOUSE, THE SENATE, AND TO

THE PRESIDENT'S OFFICE.

I'M A SCHOOL PRINCIPAL, AND I SAID

EXCUSE MY FRENCH, HELL NO, WE ARE GOING TO GET THIS DONE.

IMMEDIATELY I WENT TO ATTACK MODE, I SAID MR.

SPEAKER, I NEED

YOUR HELP, THE FBI NEEDS HER HELP, THE COUNTRY NEEDS HER

HELP, WE HAVE NO TIME TO WASTE.

HE WENT INTO ATTACK MODE, AND IN

TWO DAYS HE PULLED IT OUT OF COMMITTEE, BROUGHT IT TO THE

FLOOR FOR A VOTE, REPRESENTATIVES PRESENTED IT, WE

ALL VOTED AND I DASHED IT OVER TO THE SENATE AND PUT THE

SENATORS ON NOTICE, PUT IT ON YOUR RADAR.

SENATOR NELSON AND

SENATOR RUBIO, WHO I BELIEVE HAVE REPRESENTED OF HERE TODAY,

THEY HOTLINED IT TO THE SENATE FLOOR IN JUST TWO DAYS, AND

GUESS WHAT?

THE PRESIDENT SIGNED THE BILL INTO LAW THIS PAST

TUESDAY, APRIL 7, 2015, WITH A BANG, BANG, BANG.

IT'S A MIRACLE

TO SAY THE LEAST, BUT IT SPEAKS TO THE RESPECT THAT OUR CONGRESS

HAS FOR THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, THE MEN AND WOMEN

WHO PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE EVERYTHING A DAY. AND TODAY WE

ARE PROVIDING A BOOST --

>>IT GOES ON LIKE THAT BUT WHAT YOU SEE IS THAT SHE IS TALKING

ABOUT THE PROCESS, AT THIS DEDICATION, OF GETTING SOME

ADDITIONAL FUNDING, AND TO THE EXTENT THAT SHE IS

GRANDSTANDING, SHE'S ALSO GIVING CREDIT TO BASICALLY EVERYONE

ELSE ALONG THE WAY.

>>SHE IS QUITE INCLUSIVE.

>>IT WAS AN ANECDOTE ABOUT FINALIZING SOMETHING FOR THE

BUILDING, AND NOT WHAT GENERAL KELLY SAYS, CLAIMING SHE GOT THE

MONEY TO BUILD THE BUILDING.

YOU COULD SAY SHE'S GIVING A

RAMBLING ANECDOTE, THAT'S WHAT POLITICIANS DO UNFORTUNATELY,

BUT TO SAY THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF HER TRYING TO TAKE CREDIT FOR

EVERYTHING AND TRY TO DISCREDIT HER, SAYING YOU CAN'T BELIEVE

SHE REPRESENTS THIS WIDOW WHO HAS COME OUT AND CONFIRMED THAT

TRUMP SAID WHAT HE SAID, TRUMP'S OWN PEOPLE HAVE CONFIRMED HE

SAID IT, AND THEY ARE ATTEMPTING TO MUDDY THE WATERS AND

CONFUSE YOU ABOUT THE WHOLE THING.

>>JUST AS A TESTAMENT TO THE ANECDOTE SHE WAS GIVING, JAMES

COMEY WAS AT THAT CEREMONY AS WELL, AND IN HIS PREPARED

REMARKS HE DISCUSSED THE IMPORTANCE OF IT HAVING A NAME

FOR THE DEDICATION AND HOW QUICKLY THE CONGRESSWOMAN WAS

ABLE TO PROVIDE THE INITIAL BOOST TO GET THAT TO HAPPEN, IT

WAS A BIG DEAL FOR THEM.

IT WASN'T OUT OF LEFT FIELD, IT WAS

PART OF THEIR PREPARED REMARKS.

GOES BACK TO THE FACT THAT THIS

IS A REFLECTION OF, AND I KNOW THIS IS AN EASY GO TO BUT IT'S

ALSO TRUE, OF WHAT TRUMP'S M.O. IS, TO CASH IN ON OTHER PEOPLE

AND MAKE THEM SUBJUGATE THEMSELVES.

AT EVERY EVENT KELLY

SAYS NOT A SINGLE WORD, HE JUST POINTS TO THE PRESIDENT AND

CLAPS AND EVERYONE CHEERS AND HE WALKS AWAY.

HE HAD TO GIVE THIS

SPEECH, JUST LIKE TILLERSON HAD TO DO IT THREE WEEKS AGO, I

DIDN'T SAY HE WAS A MORON.

>>AND THEN EVENTUALLY HE CASTS THEM OFF.

>>HE BURNS THEIR CREDIBILITY DOWN AND MOVES ON, THAT'S

OUR AFFECTION OF HIS OVERALL APPROACH.

>>I WISH THERE HADN'T BEEN THIS WEIRD TENSION IN THE NEWS BUT I

THINK IT'S IMPORTANT ESPECIALLY FOR TRUMP SUPPORTERS TO

UNDERSTAND THAT, FORGET ABOUT THE JOHN KELLY AND THE WILSON

THING, THE DISRESPECT GIVEN ROUTINELY FROM DONALD TRUMP TO

THE GOLDSTAR FAMILIES AND ALL THAT, THAT IS IMPORTANT, I DON'T

KNOW THAT IT WILL PENETRATE AND HIS SUPPORTERS WILL BE AFFECTED

BY IT, HE'S BEEN ROUTINELY DISRESPECTFUL TO THE MILITARY

FOR MANY YEARS AT THIS POINT, BUT HOPEFULLY ONCE THIS HAS BEEN

RESOLVED WE CAN GET BACK TO THE REAL STORY WHICH IS WHAT

ACTUALLY HAPPENED IN AFRICA, HOW WE GOT TO THAT SITUATION.

NOT

JUST WHAT HAPPENED THAT NIGHT, BUT WHY THAT SITUATION

DEVELOPED.

LAST NIGHT I BELIEVE RACHEL MADDOW TALKED ABOUT SOME

OF THE POLICY DECISIONS THAT MIGHT HAVE LED TO THAT, HAVING

TO DO WITH CHAD AND SOME OF THAT, BUT THAT'S AN INTERESTING

SITUATION.

THE REASON WE HAVE THIS TENTED IS BECAUSE TRUMP

REFUSED TO GO ON RECORD ABOUT WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED ON THE

GROUND, AND IT MIGHT WELL BE, I SAW THIS EDITORIAL, DON'T MAKE

THIS SITUATION INTO TRUMP'S BENGHAZI -- BUT I THINK THIS IS

EXACTLY LIKE BENGHAZI.

NOT WHAT BENGHAZI BECAME, BUT WHAT IT

WAS, A MILITARY SITUATION THAT

GOT OUT OF CONTROL, THERE IS NO

HUGE CONSPIRACY, THERE'S JUST IRRESPONSIBILITY AND POOR

DECISION-MAKING.

AND TRUMP MADE IT SO MUCH WORSE BECAUSE HE REFUSED TO BE

FORTHCOMING.

>> WHEN THIS WAS FIRST HAPPENING I THOUGHT, I HOPE THE PRESIDENT

WILL ASK ABOUT WHY OUR TROOPS ARE THERE AND WHAT THE MISSION

WAS ABOUT.

THAT'S NOT WHAT HAPPENED, IT ENDED UP BEING A

WHOLE QUESTION OF HOW COME YOU WAITED SO LONG TO CALL THE

FAMILIES, IT TURNED INTO WHAT WE'VE JUST BEEN TALKING ABOUT.

BUT THE SPECIFICS ALSO OF HOW TRUMP HAS TARNISHED, AND HOW

KELLY AND THIS ADMINISTRATION, HAVE TARNISHED THIS

CONGRESSWOMAN, HOW SHE WAS LISTENING IN ON THE CALL.

THERE'S A SENSE THAT EVERYONE IS SITTING AROUND AND SHE'S

LISTENING IN ON THE EXTENSION --

>>THE

WIDOW PUT IT ON SPEAKERPHONE, SORRY, SHE GETS TO DO THAT.

>> SHE WAS DRIVING TO PICK UP THE CORPSE OF HER DEAD SON, AND

THE CONGRESSWOMAN WAS ACCOMPANYING HER, AND THE CALL

CAME IN AND IT WAS ON THE SPEAKERPHONE, THERE'S NOTHING

DAMNING ABOUT THAT SCENARIO, AND IT EXPLAINS THE RELATIONSHIP

BETWEEN THE CONGRESSWOMAN AND THE FAMILY AND THE FALLEN

SOLDIER.

BUT THE FACT THAT IT HAS BEEN POLITICIZED, TO USE THE

OVERUSED WORD, BUT IT'S APPROPRIATE -- BUT ALSO THAT IT

HAS BEEN USED TO SOMEHOW TARNISH THIS PROUD FAMILY AND THIS

CONGRESSWOMAN, IS ABHORRENT TO ME.

>>THIS WHOLE SITUATION IS IMPORTANT BUT I AGREE, AT SOME

POINT THE REAL STORY, EVEN OUTSIDE OF THIS INCIDENT, IT'S

THE CONTEXTUAL BATTLE GOING ON IN THIS REGION, I BELIEVE TODAY,

I FORGET WHO IT WAS, A SENATOR, MAYBE LINDSEY GRAHAM, TALKING

ABOUT HOW THE WAR HAS SHIFTED TO AFRICA, IT'S COMPLICATED,

MULTIPLE COUNTRIES BORDERING NIGER HAVING TERRORIST GROUPS

THAT ARE ALIGNED WITH ISIS, PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THAT,

THERE HAS TO BE A CONVERSATION ABOUT THE NUMBER OF TROOPS

THERE, HOW DO WE ACCESS IF IT HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL, ARE WE

SIMPLY GOING TO LEAVE THEM FOR YEARS ON END?

HOW MANY TROOPS

ARE THERE, IS IT 100 OR 1000, THAT SEEMS IMPORTANT.

AND WE ARE

STILL WAITING FOR INFORMATION TO COME OUT ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR

INCIDENT, IT WILL COME OUT, THERE IS AN INVESTIGATION

ONGOING, BUT IN PARTICULAR THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR THAT SENT THE

RESCUE, THE HELICOPTER, IF IT WAS THEIR FAULT FOR LEAVING

BEHIND A SOLDIER WE NEED TO KNOW THAT, AND WE HAVE BEEN LONG

OVERDUE FOR A LARGER CONVERSATION ABOUT THE ROLE OF

PRIVATE MILITARY CONTRACTORS IN OUR OPERATIONS, AND MAYBE

THIS COULD LEAD TO THAT.

>>I'M GLAD YOU MENTIONED PRIVATE CONTRACTORS BECAUSE QUICKLY,

THERE IS A BIG MOVE, ERIC PRINCE, THE BLACKWATER HEAD,

THEY ARE THE BIG CONTRACTORS WHO MADE OUT LIKE CRAZY ON THE IRAQ

WAR, HE'S PUSHING FOR THE PRIVATIZATION OF ALL OF THESE

WARS.

THAT WE CONTRACT ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT THINGS OUT.

THAT

NOW IS THE TIME TO PRIVATELY CONTRACT ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT

SKIRMISHES AND WAR THEATERS OUT. AND THIS IS THE MINISTRATION TO

HELP HIM DO IT.

IF EVER THERE WAS A TIME IN THIS COUNTRY WHEN

WE WOULD HAND OVER THE KEYS TO OUR MILITARY TO PRIVATE

CONTRACTORS, IT IS NOW.

SO KEEP YOUR EYE ON THAT BALL IS THIS

ENTIRE DEBATE CONTINUES.

ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE

MILITARY, KEEP YOUR EYE ON THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR PART OF

THAT EQUATION.

For more infomation >> John Kelly Lies To Cover For Trump - Duration: 12:50.

-------------------------------------------

Trump: Due Process Is For White People, Gitmo Is For Muslims - Duration: 3:36.

WE FOUND OUT TODAY HOW THEY ARE GOING TO RESPOND TO THE

ATTACK YESTERDAY.

IT IS NOT JUST GOING AFTER THIS DIVERSITY VISA LOTTERY PROGRAM.

TRUMP ALSO TOLD REPORTERS THIS.

THAT IS GOOD.

THE WHITE HOUSE ALSO SAID THIS.

HE IS A GUY THAT WAS IN NEW YORK.

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT HE IS AN ENEMY COMBATANT?

I WANT YOU TO COME TO GRIPS WITH THE IDEA THAT DONALD TRUMP

GETS TO LABEL PEOPLE ENEMY COMBATANTS NOW.

A WHILE BACK A COUPLE OF RIGHT-WINGERS WENT AND SHOT

A COUPLE OF POLICE OFFICERS IN NEVADA.

THEY SAID THEY WERE DOING IT FOR POLITICAL REASONS AND THEY LAID

THE GATSON FLAG ON THEIR BODIES.

NOW YOU MIGHT HAVE HEARD ABOUT THAT STORY OR BARELY BECAUSE IF

IT IS A NON-MUSLIM WE DON'T GO WALL-TO-WALL WITH COVERAGE.

AND TALK ABOUT IT FOR LIKE A DAY.

SO THAT IS BASICALLY HOW THAT STORY WAS TREATED.

SHOULD WE HAVE TAKEN THOSE GUYS AND PUT THEM INTO GITMO AND

TREAT THEM AS ENEMY COMBATANTS?

OF COURSE NOT.

THEY ARE HERE, IT IS ON AMERICAN SOIL AND THEY COMMITTED AN ACT.

UNLIKE DONALD TRUMP I BELIEVE IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM.

IT HAS A LOT OF ISSUES AND I WANT TO MAKE IT MUCH BETTER.

BUT OVERALL DO I BELIEVE THAT DEFENDANTS SHOULD HAVE RIGHTS?

YES.

HABEAS CORPUS?

YES.

I BELIEVE IN OUR CONSTITUTION AND JUSTICE SYSTEM.

I BELIEVE IT CAN BRING THOSE MONSTERS AND ABOUT THE

JUSTICE AND THIS MONSTER IN NEW YORK TO JUSTICE.

IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM AND YOU DON'T

BELIEVE IN OUR FORMER GOVERNMENT, THEN YOU SHOULD

NOT LEAD IT.

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT HIM ANNOUNCING THAT HE THINKS OUR

JUSTICE SYSTEM IS A JOKE AND A LAUGHINGSTOCK?

DO YOU THINK YOU

TALKING ABOUT THOSE WELL REASONED CRITICISM OF SYSTEMIC

RACISM OR HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT WE

REALIZE THIS WEEK THAT THREE OF HIS CAMPAIGN STAFF

INCLUDING HIS FORMER CAMPAIGN CHAIRMAN HAVE BEEN ARRESTED?

I'M SURE HE'S TALKING ABOUT THE TWO-TIER JUSTICE SYSTEM

WHERE PEOPLE WITH AFFLUENZA GETTING OFF FOR KILLING PEOPLE.

BUT IF YOU ARE POOR AND YOU SMOKED A JOINT YOU WILL GO

TO PRISON FOR 20 YEARS.

HE'S TALKING ABOUT OVERCROWDED PRISONS AND ñ

HE'S NOT TALKING TO ANY OF THAT, HE'S SAYING I AM

POWERFUL, HOW DARE YOU ARREST THE RICH AND POWERFUL.

AND IN THIS GUY WHO WAS A TERRIBLE HUMAN BEING WHO

SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE IN NEW YORK SAYS I DON'T BELIEVE

IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM, I HATE THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM.

TRUMP SAID IT WAS A LAUGHINGSTOCK.

HE HATES OUR

SYSTEM AND HE SAYS I DON'T BELIEVE IN IT AND WANTS TO

SEND HIM TO GITMO BECAUSE GITMO IS LAWLESS.

HE BELIEVES IN LAWLESSNESS MORE THAN IN AMERICA AND OUR

CONSTITUTION.

THIS GUY IS NOT FIT TO BE A LEADER BECAUSE HE DOESN'T

EVEN BELIEVE IN THE CONCEPT OF THE COUNTRY.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét