Learn colors for kids - Color truck, Color fruit with spiderman - Nursery rhymes for children
-------------------------------------------
Baby Kids takes Lollipops & Crying for Tantrum & Learn Colors with Finger Family Song Nursery Rhymes - Duration: 3:47.
Baby Kids takes Lollipops & Crying for Tantrum & Learn Colors with Finger Family Song Nursery Rhymes
-------------------------------------------
Mila Kunis Bailed on World Series Game 7 for James - Duration: 4:43.
For more infomation >> Mila Kunis Bailed on World Series Game 7 for James - Duration: 4:43. -------------------------------------------
Guest Host Channing Tatum Asks Kids for Advice - Duration: 4:00.
For more infomation >> Guest Host Channing Tatum Asks Kids for Advice - Duration: 4:00. -------------------------------------------
Trump's Name For His Tax Bill Is So... Trumpy - Duration: 4:53.
For more infomation >> Trump's Name For His Tax Bill Is So... Trumpy - Duration: 4:53. -------------------------------------------
Woody Harrelson Asked Bryan Cranston for Help - Duration: 4:04.
For more infomation >> Woody Harrelson Asked Bryan Cranston for Help - Duration: 4:04. -------------------------------------------
Kenneth Branagh's Plan for Hand & Footprint Ceremony - Duration: 3:22.
For more infomation >> Kenneth Branagh's Plan for Hand & Footprint Ceremony - Duration: 3:22. -------------------------------------------
Commercial for Captain Morgan with Guillermo - Duration: 1:27.
For more infomation >> Commercial for Captain Morgan with Guillermo - Duration: 1:27. -------------------------------------------
Congress Made It Easier For Big Banks To Steal From You - Duration: 7:54.
LATE LAST NIGHT THE REPUBLICANS IN THE SENATE VOTED
TO GIVE BANKS CREDIT CARD COMPANIES, EVEN COMPANIES LIKE
APPLE FAX BROAD IMMUNITY FROM LAWSUITS FROM PEOPLE LIKE
YOU BLOCKING A SEEM TO BE IN LIMITED ROLE THAT CAME OUT
OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU.
YOU MIGHT ASK WITH COMPANIES LIKE BANKS AND CREDIT CARD
COMPANIES AND ALL OF THAT WHAT YOU MEAN RESTORE THE RIGHT
TO SUE.
WHAT YOU GENERALLY HAVE TO GO THROUGH THANKS TO THE TERMS OF
SERVICE IS THROUGH ARBITRATION WHICH IS LIKE A LAWSUIT BUT
ALMOST ENTIRELY UNDER THE CONTROL OF THAT CORPORATION.
YOUR ABILITY TO BAND TOGETHER WITH OTHER PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN
WRONGED BY THE CORPORATION IS ELIMINATED IN THAT CASE AND
YOUR ABILITY TO GET SOMETHING FOR WHAT HAS BEEN DONE TO
YOU IS EFFECTIVELY NIL.
WE WERE GOING TO HAVE THAT, BUT NOW WE DON'T THANKS TO
REPUBLICANS.
AND JUST FOR THE RECORD IF YOU'RE LOOKING FOR DEFIANCE
AGAINST TRUMP AND HIS AGENDA ALL BUT TWO REPUBLICANS VOTED
TO REPEAL THE RULE.
LET'S BREAK THIS DOWN A COUPLE OF WAYS, TO YOUR LAST
POINT ABOUT HEROES OF THE RESISTANCE FROM THE RIGHT WING,
JEFF FLAKE WHERE ARE YOU?
I THOUGHT YOU WERE FIGHTING TRUMP.
CORKER WHERE ARE YOU?
IT GOES TO THE POINT OF THEY ARE LOOKING TO ROB YOU.
GUYS LIKE CORKER AND MCCAIN, THEY HAVE HEARD FROM PEOPLE
INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE AND SEEN IT WITH THEIR OWN EYES, THE GUY
IS A TOTAL BUFFOON AND COMPLETELY DANGEROUS.
AT ANY MOMENT HE COULD START A WAR AND EVEN JOHN MCCAIN.
LET'S GO BACK TO THIS ISSUE AND WHAT THIS IS.
LET ME BREAK DOWN FOR YOU THE GIGANTIC DIFFERENCE THAT
THIS MAKES.
WHEN THESE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, AND IT
APPLIES TO OTHER COMPANIES ALSO.
BECAUSE NOW EVERYTHING IS FORCED INTO ARBITRATION BECAUSE THE
SUPREME COURT IS ALSO CORPORATIST.
IT IS A LONG STORY I CAN GET INTO BUT ANYWAY ñ
THEY MADE THE DECISION IN 2011, 2013.
IN 2009 THERE ARE SOME CLASS-ACTION LAWSUITS OUT
THERE, BUT ESPECIALLY FOR FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS THEY
ARE NOW FAR MORE LIMITED.
BACK WHEN THEY EXISTED PEOPLE FOUND OUT THAT BANKS WERE
RIPPING YOU OFF ON OVERDRAFTS.
THEY DID THAT SYSTEMATICALLY AND TO THE TUNE OF BILLIONS OF
DOLLARS.
THEY WOULD JUST TAKE FROM YOU FIVE BUCKS AT A TIME, 20 BUCKS
AT A TIME.
THEY KNEW WAS WRONG BUT THEY DID IT ANYWAY.
IT IS GREAT THAT WE CAUGHT THEM ON IT.
WE WERE RIGHT AND THEY DID A CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT, PUT
DOWN A BUNCH OF PEOPLE TOGETHER AND SAID YOU DID IT TO ALL
OF US AND $1 BILLION WAS RETURNED TO CONSUMERS.
THE PEOPLE WHO WERE RIPPED OFF.
MORE SHOULD'VE BEEN RETURNED BUT THAT IS STILL GREAT, YOU
GOTTA BILLION BACK TO CONSUMERS WHO WERE LITERALLY ROBBED.
IT WAS DECIDED BY THE COURTS, THEY WERE ROBBED AND THEY
GOTTA BILLION DOLLARS BACK.
NOW CLASS-ACTION LAWSUITS ARE NOT ALLOWED FOR MOST OF THOSE
ISSUES SO THEY DID A TWO-YEAR STUDY IN ARBITRATION CLAIMS.
THE PROBLEM WITH ARBITRATION IS IT IS STACKED AGAINST YOU
IN TWO WAYS.
YOU CAN'T BAND TOGETHER WITH EVERYBODY SEE YOU CAN'T
AFFORD A LAWYER.
LET ALONE A DRAGGED OUT LONG LAWSUIT.
NUMBER TWO, THE LAWYERS USED IN ARBITRATION USUALLY WORK FOR
CORPORATIONS.
THEY ARE NOT BAD PEOPLE THAT YOU
ARE UNLIKELY TO HIRE THEM.
SO THAT IS ANOTHER INSTITUTIONAL
PROBLEM.
SO WHAT HAPPENS?
IN THOSE TWO YEARS THEY WERE 78 ARBITRATION
CLAIMS THAT FOUND IN FAVOR OF THE CONSUMERS WHICH IS
PREPOSTEROUSLY LOW.
TO THE TUNE OF $400,000.
IN ONE CASE ALONE, THEY SAID WE DON'T LIKE CORPORATIONS, WE
WILL GIVE THEM MORE POWER.
BEFORE THAT YOU HAD $1 BILLION RETURN TO CONSUMERS.
AFTERWARDS $400,000 TO 78 CASES.
THIS IS HOW THEY REDISTRIBUTE THE WEALTH.
THIS ALLOWS FOR THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO
SYSTEMICALLY RIP YOU OFF AND GET AWAY WITH IT.
AND REPUBLICANS LOVE IT, THAT IS THEIR MAIN MODUS OPERANDI.
JUST
TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF HOW BRAZEN THEY ARE ñ IF THIS
RULE HAD GONE INTO EFFECT AND YOU HAD WANTED TO TAKE SOME SORT
OF LEGAL ACTION YOU WOULD HAD A COUPLE OF ACTIONS.
YOU COULD GO THROUGH ARBITRATION OR DO A CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT.
THEY HAVE TAKEN AWAY ONE OF THOSE TWO THINGS AND THEIR
MESSAGING AS TO WHY IS TO INCREASE FREEDOM AND CHOICE.
THEY
ARE BRAZEN ABOUT IT BECAUSE THEY THINK IT DOESN'T MATTER.
I HOPE THE INTERNET HAS BEGUN THE FIX THAT BECAUSE NOW WE
ARE ON TO THEM AND AT LEAST YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO YOU.
YOUR CHOICE, IF YOU LIKE BEING ROBBED BY YOUR BANK VOTE
REPUBLICAN.
-------------------------------------------
'Tis The Season For Treason: A Very Mueller Christmas - Duration: 9:36.
For more infomation >> 'Tis The Season For Treason: A Very Mueller Christmas - Duration: 9:36. -------------------------------------------
Haley Bennett on New Film Thank You for Your Service - Duration: 1:35.
For more infomation >> Haley Bennett on New Film Thank You for Your Service - Duration: 1:35. -------------------------------------------
Millions of Chinese children fend for themselves when parents must follow work far away - Duration: 8:53.
JUDY WOODRUFF: When Chinese President Xi Jinping marked the beginning of a new five-year term
last week, he spoke of a China focused on common prosperity, a nation where no one must
be left behind.
But while reaching that ambitious goal, there are millions of children in China who must
often fend for themselves, as their parents move to China's cities to find work.
In partnership with the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting, special correspondent Max
Duncan reports from Liangshan, China.
MAX DUNCAN: Deep in the mountains of Southwest China, three children are used to being by
themselves.
Their parents are nowhere in sight, but the siblings are not orphans.
They're among an estimated nine million minors left behind in the Chinese countryside by
parents who work far away in wealthier cities.
They see their parents a couple of times a year.
Twelve-year-old Wang Bing is the most outgoing and loves to read.
WANG BING, 12 Years Old (through translator): I think my sister is very brave.
My brother is quite naughty.
We know how to take care of ourselves here.
MAX DUNCAN: The children stay in their school dormitory during the week.
On weekends and school holidays, they often cook and wash for themselves.
WANG BING (through translator): My parents are working in Guangdong Province.
I don't know what they do.
They don't tell me.
It's boring here, just us three children.
I miss them.
MAX DUNCAN: Most so-called left-behind children rely on grandparents, but not all can provide
the care needed.
These children's maternal grandmother lives a 40-minute walk away along a mountain path.
Sometimes, she comes to help with the farmwork and keep an eye on them, but she has other
fields to tend and younger grandchildren to look after.
In such cases, older girls often take on the role of mother.
Fourteen-year-old Wang Ying resents the burden placed on her, and refuses to speak to her
parents on the phone.
She finds it too upsetting.
WANG YING, 14 Years Old (through translator): I'm the only one who's grown up.
I have to do the farmwork, and I have to study too.
When my brother and sister don't do what I tell them, I miss my mom and dad.
And when the farmwork is too hard for me, I miss my mom and dad.
And, sometimes, the teacher tells me off when I don't know the answer.
Then I really miss my mom and dad.
MAX DUNCAN: The walk to school takes an hour.
The family are from the Yi, one of China's largest ethnic minority groups.
Under China's complex one-child policy, which ended in 2015, rural residents and ethnic
minorities were allowed to have more than one child.
Liangshan, where they live, is one of China's poorest areas.
There's little meaningful work their parents could have done here.
Surveys show that growing up without parents can lead to a raft of developmental problems.
Ron Pouwels is UNICEF China's head of child protection.
RON POUWELS, UNICEF China: It can lead to psychological problems.
It could lead to behavior problems.
We know that children who are left behind do less well in school.
And, yes, all these things have, of course, an impact on the later adult life of children.
MAX DUNCAN: Over 1,000 miles southeast of Liangshan lies Huizhou, a city of almost five
million people in China's manufacturing belt.
And it's where the children's parents work.
They make headphones and cables in a factory with hundreds of other workers from rural
areas.
For an 11-hour day, they earn around 15 U.S. dollars each.
The couple are illiterate and speak little Mandarin, China's official language, so they
are determined that their children will have a better chance than they did.
JIAJIA, Mother (through translator): The two of us understand too well the curse of illiteracy.
So long as the children don't give up, we must support their study.
MAX DUNCAN: China's economic explosion has drawn an estimated 200 million laborers like
them from the countryside.
But with wages rising fast, factories like theirs are now turning to workers from poorer
areas who will still accept low wages.
The children's mother, Jiajia, constantly questions whether leaving was the right decision.
JIAJIA (through translator): I worry the kids will get cold in the wind and rain, or that
a stranger will come to the house.
I heard rumors of people stealing children's organs.
I was so worried, I couldn't sleep.
MAX DUNCAN: The plight of left-behind children has come to the forefront of public debate
in China after several unsupervised children died in another poor region in 2015.
Some blame China's household registration system, which controls population movement
by allowing people free public services like education and health care in the place where
they were born, but not in the cities they move to.
Authorities are reforming the system, but change has been slower in some big cities,
where bringing up children is also more expensive.
Concerned about neglected children, the government is introducing more social workers to rural
areas.
And they are also considering tougher measures.
A new way that the authorities hope to tackle the problem is by punishing absent parents
for neglecting those children.
But many people are asking, until those parents are either allowed to bring their children
with them or can find well-paid work closer to home, what choice do they really have?
Wang Zhenyao is a former official with China's Ministry of Civil Affairs.
He supports a proposed law which would criminally charge parents who leave children without
proper supervision for more than six months.
WANG ZHENYAO, Former Official, Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs (through translator): We
need to put some pressure on young parents, make them legally and socially responsible.
That way, we can first set rules for the care of left-behind children starting at the most
basic family level.
MAX DUNCAN: Back in Southwest China, it's summer holidays, and the children visit their
paternal grandparents, who live in an even more remote area five hours' travel away.
It's also the time for the torch festival, the most important celebration in the Yi minority's
calendar.
At night, the children light torches, traditionally to scare away pests that damage crops.
While their parents' absence is conspicuous, Wang Bing is happy to be with the wider family.
WANG BING (through translator): Mom and dad aren't here, but grandma and grandpa are here,
so I really enjoy it, because grandma and grandpa are just like a mom and dad to me.
They're really great.
MAX DUNCAN: Meanwhile, their mother, who has been worried about them, has decided to come
back to take care of them, leaving her husband to earn money.
To get back, she takes a 36-hour bus with other Yi workers.
It's then a two-hour uphill walk from the road to the grandparents' house.
She finds the children up a hill, where they have been farming.
The sweets go down well with the younger children and their cousins.
But elder sister Wang Ying is reticent, and initially speaks little to her mother.
JIAJIA (through translator): I haven't seen the children in months, and they're very naughty.
They're all bigger, but they're wilder.
Children without parents are different to those with parents at home.
They haven't been keeping clean.
They're very messy.
MAX DUNCAN: Her mother's return means some of the weight is lifted from Wang Ying's shoulders,
and she's happy to slack off.
WANG YING (through translator): Now that mom has come back, I don't have to look after
my brother and sister anymore, and I don't have to do as much farmwork as I used to.
MAX DUNCAN: But the future is far from clear.
The family will struggle to subsist on one income alone.
JIAJIA (through translator): I don't want to leave the children again to live like orphans.
But if we can't afford to live, I would have no choice but to go back out to work.
MAX DUNCAN: At least for the time being, Wang Ying is a little freer to be what she ultimately
still is, a child.
For the "PBS NewsHour," I'm Max Duncan in Liangshan, China.
-------------------------------------------
Trump Tax Reform Coming For Your 401(k) - Duration: 5:54.
IF YOU ARE NOT ALREADY TERRIFIED BY WHAT TRUMP AND THE GOP'S
UPCOMING TAX POLICY CHANGES WILL DO TO YOU AND THE COUNTRY
WAIT UNTIL YOU FIND OUT WHAT THEY MIGHT DO TO YOUR 401(K),
ONE OF THE THINGS YOU AS AN INDIVIDUAL CAN ACTUALLY
RELY ON OVER THE COURSE OF YOUR LIFE IF YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE
AND SAFE TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE NOT DESTITUTE AND ON THE STREET.
YOU MIGHT HAVE READ THAT DONALD TRUMP IS A BIG FAN OF KEEPING
401(K)S THE WAY IT IS.
HE IMMEDIATELY CHANGED HIS MIND WITHIN 24 HOURS.
HE IS NOW SAYING HE IS OPEN TO POSSIBLY NEGOTIATING TO
CHANGE THAT.
SO TRUMP IS WILLING TO NEGOTIATE ON THAT JUST TWO DAYS AFTER
SAYING THAT HE WOULDN'T.
THIS IS NOT OUT OF TRUMP, THIS IS OUT OF SOME OF THE
REPUBLICANS THAT KNOW SOME OF THE DETAILS.
FOR A LOT OF AMERICANS THEY CAN PUT 18,000 IN, BUT IT SURE
WOULD BE NICE TO BE ABLE TO HAVE YOUR INCOME ROSE AT SOME POINT.
THAT IS MASSIVELY LOWERING IT DOWN, THAT MEANS YOU DON'T
BENEFIT FROM THE TAX SAVINGS OF THAT ADDITIONAL $16,000.
LET'S BREAK THIS DOWN.
KEVIN BRADY SAID YOU CAN CREATE INCENTIVES.
YOU JUST DID THE EXACT OPPOSITE.
THEY COULD'VE SAVED MORE AND SOONER IF YOU ALLOW THEM TO PUT
MORE INTO THEIR 401(K) TAX-FREE.
THAT WOULD'VE CREATED AN INCENTIVE TO SAVE MORE FASTER.
YOU DID THE EXACT OPPOSITE.
YOU SAID YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PUT THAT MUCH INTO YOUR
401(K) ANYMORE.
DO YOU KNOW WHAT THIS DOES?
INCREASES TAXES ON THE MIDDLE CLASS.
THEY HAVE TO GET THE MONEY SOMEWHERE.
THEY ARE ABOUT TO GIVE A COUPLE TRILLION TO THE RICH.
THEY HAVE TO GIVES THE MONEY TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO
FINANCE WARS AND EVERYTHING ELSE THEY WANT TO DO.
WHERE ARE WE GOING TO GET IT FROM?
LET'S GO RUB THE MIDDLE CLASS AND THEN DO A BRAZEN LIE
WHERE WE SAY THE EXACT OPPOSITE.
THAT IS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY FOR YOU.
I HAVE THE STORY TEED UP, THE 401(K)
STORY ON MONDAY, AND WE COULDN'T GET TO IT.
I WISH WE HAD BECAUSE I HAD TRUMP'S TWEET ABOUT WHERE HE
SAID THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE TO YOUR 401(K).
THAT WAS HIS SWEET AND I WAS GOING TO SAY THAT IS GREAT,
AND THEN HE CHANGED HIS MIND.
BUT I'M TRUMP THE REASON I WAS GOING TO SAY THAT IS
BECAUSE IT IS WHOEVER WAS IN THE ROOM LAST.
MAYBE STEVE BANNON ñ HE CALLS THEM UP AND SAYS LET'S GIVE IT
TO THE MIDDLE CLASS OR SOMETHING.
I KNEW MCCONNELL WAS GOING TO COME IN NEXT AND SAY HEY IDIOT
THE PEOPLE WHO DONATED TO YOU AND WHO YOU WORK FOR WANT TO
SCREW THE MIDDLE CLASS.
WE ARE REALLY IN A CRAPPY
POSITION BECAUSE WE ARE
STUCK BETWEEN THE DESIRE OF REPUBLICANS TO TAKE EXTRA
MONEY FROM YOU SO THEY CAN GIVE IT TO THE RICH AND THE CONCERNS
THEY HAVE FOR THEIR DONORS SOME OF WHOM WORK IN INDUSTRIES
THAT WOULD USE THE MONEY YOU ARE PUTTING IN YOUR 401(K)
TO MAKE INVESTMENTS AND THEY CAN GENERATE MONEY OFF OF THAT.
I DON'T KNOW IF THE INDIVIDUAL RICH PEOPLE OR THE COMPANIES
WILL BENEFIT.
THE PEOPLE WHO BENEFIT FROM THE 401(K)S,
COMPANIES, WILL FIGHT BACK AGAINST US.
NOW I GET TO DO A PREDICTION.
TRUMBULL FLIP-FLOP ON THIS FOUR TIMES.
401 TIMES.
LITERALLY FOUR TIMES BECAUSE DIFFERENT LOBBYISTS AND
FINANCIAL INTERESTS WILL COME INTO THE ROOM.
THE MOST IMPORTANT PART IS THE HOUSE MEANS COMMITTEE IS SUPER
IMPORTANT, THEY ARE THE ONES THAT CONTROL ALL THE MONEY AND
REPUBLICANS WHO CONTROL THAT ARE SAYING WE NEVER MEANT
MIDDLE-CLASS TAX CUTS.
IN FACT WE MEANT MIDDLE-CLASS TAX INCREASES YOU IDIOTS.
TEXT CUTS ARE FOR THE RICH, THAT IS WHAT KEVIN BRADY AND ALL
OF THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS ARE SAYING.
-------------------------------------------
Trump Takes Credit For Releasing The JFK Files - Duration: 5:14.
For more infomation >> Trump Takes Credit For Releasing The JFK Files - Duration: 5:14. -------------------------------------------
Chuck Schumer: Trump Cut Funding For Anti-Terrorism Program - Duration: 4:27.
TRUMP
ATTACKED NOT ONLY THE DIVERSITY VISA BUT DEMOCRATIC SEN.,
CHUCK SCHUMER SPECIFICALLY.
CHUCK SCHUMER RESPONDED BOTH ON SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE SENATE
FLOOR.
THEN HE WENT ON TO SAY THIS.
I HAVE ALWAYS BELIEVED THAT IMMIGRATION IS GOOD FOR
AMERICA, I BELIEVE IT TODAY.
PRESIDENT TRUMP INSTEAD OF POLITICIZING AND DIVIDING
AMERICA, WHICH HE ALWAYS SEEMS TO DO AT TIMES OF NATIONAL
TRAGEDY SHOULD BE BRINGING US TOGETHER AND FOCUSING ON THE
REAL SOLUTION, ANTI-TERRORISM FUNDING WHICH SHE PROPOSED
TO CUT IN HIS MOST RECENT BUDGET.
SO I AM CALLING ON THE PRESIDENT TO RESCIND HIS PROPOSED
CUTS TO HIS VITAL ANTITERRORISM FUNDING IMMEDIATELY.
A GREAT EXAMPLE OF THE SORT OF THING THAT FOR WHATEVER
REASON WILL NOT REACH 32% OF THIS COUNTRY.
THAT HE LITERALLY CUT THE FUNDING FOR THESE SORTS OF
ANTITERRORISM INVESTIGATIONS.
IF YOU ASK HIS CAR, THEY WILL SAY HE IS THE ONLY ONE WHO
WILL DEFEND US AS HE LITERALLY TAKES THE MONEY AWAY TO
GIVE IT TO BILLIONAIRES.
TOMORROW HE SHOULD GO ON CNN, MSNBC AND SAY IT AGAIN.
AND ON FRIDAY DO IT AGAIN AND ON SUNDAY DO IT AGAIN.
AND HOLD A PIECE OF PAPER THAT SHOWS THAT.
AND SAY IT AGAIN FOR THE NEXT TWO MONTHS SO THEY SAY CHUCK
SCHUMER WOULD STOP TALKING ABOUT THIS ANTITERRORISM THING THAT
DONALD TRUMP KEEPS CUTTING OUT OF HIS BUDGET.
WHAT IS IN IT AGAIN?
THE ANTITERRORISM PROGRAM THAT YOU KEEP CUTTING.
I'VE BEEN LISTENING TO A LOT OF TALK LIVE RADIO LATELY BECAUSE
OF THE BASEBALL WORLD SERIES AND THERE ARE ADS THAT RUN THAT THEY
CONTACT US, JOHN PLUMMER.COM.
MY KIDS ARE IN THE BACKSEAT SAYING WHY IS HE SAYING THIS
100 TIMES?
AND I SAID SO YOU NEVER FORGET IT.
SAME THING, JUST DO IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
THAT MIGHT NOT WORK WITH YOU BECAUSE I'M PRETTY SURE ONE
800 JOHN PLUMMER.COM IS NOT THE RIGHT THING.
IF YOU CAN SET HE IS CUTTING ANTI- TERRORISM FUNDS TO
THAT CARS FOR KIDS SOON, I DON'T THINK YOU WILL GET PAST IT.
YOU MIGHT BE THINKING ESPECIALLY IF YOU HAVE A
MAGA GUY, I THOUGHT WE REALLY DIDN'T WANT TO FIGHT THE
TERRORISTS AND THE BAD GUYS.
AT A MINIMUM TO WE ALL HATE MUSLIMS TOGETHER?
SO WHY ARE
THEY DOING THAT?
AND WHY DO THEY ADDED $70 BILLION TO THE DEFENSE
BUDGET WHICH IS ALREADY GARGANTUAN?
THE DEFENSE BUDGET
GOES TOWARDS DEFENSE CONTRACTORS SO THEY MAKE REALLY EXPENSIVE
PLANES THAT WE OFTEN DON'T USE.
THAT IS CRONY CAPITALISM.
FIGHTING TERRORISM IS EXPENSIVE BUT MAYBE DOESN'T GO TO THE
RIGHT PLACES.
AND WHY DO THEY HAVE TO KEEP CUTTING THE BUDGET?
BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO FINANCE THE TAX CUTS.
TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH ARE A WAY A HIGHER PRIORITY FOR TRUMP
AND HIS ADMINISTRATION THAN FIGHTING TERRORISM.
THAT IS WHAT HE CUT THOSE FUNDS.
HE FIGURES IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT I CUT AND WHAT I
ACTUALLY DO.
I AM JUST GOING TO SAY ON TWITTER HOW WE HAVE TO DO
EXTREME VETTING.
I DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT, I JUST HAVE
TO SAY I MY KNUCKLEHEAD GUYS, I THINK THE RED HATS PREVENT
THE NEURONS FROM FIRING INSIDE THE HAT.
I'LL HAVE TO DO IS SCREAM ABOUT IT ON TWITTER
AND IT WILL
BE GOOD ENOUGH.
-------------------------------------------
What Xi Jinping's power play means for U.S.-China relations - Duration: 5:13.
JUDY WOODRUFF: Over the past week, China's Communist Party has gathered for its once-every-five-year
Congress in Beijing, usually focused on policy.
It also chooses both the country's leader and his successor.
But, this year, there was a twist.
John Yang has the story.
JOHN YANG: Thanks, Judy.
Chinese President Xi Jinping is solidifying his grip on power.
Today, when he introduced new members of the so-called Standing Committee, the most powerful
group in the country, there was no successor to Xi identified.
Yesterday, Xi's doctrine was enshrined in the constitution.
That elevates him to the same status as modern China's founding communist leader, Mao Zedong.
For a look at what this means for China, the United States, and beyond, we're joined by
Christopher Johnson, who served for almost two decades as a China analyst at the CIA.
He's now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Mr. Johnson, welcome.
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, Center for Strategic and International Studies: Thank you.
JOHN YANG: This all happens, of course, just two weeks before President Trump will be in
China to meet with President Xi.
What are the implications for U.S.-China relations in all of this?
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: I think the most important development is now Xi Jinping has demonstrated
that he is the unquestioned ruler in China.
And what has been striking about the bilateral relationship really since President Trump
came into power is the two men have been actually running the relationship.
The U.S. government is not fully staffed yet, as we have seen, and the president has occasionally
undermined his own secretary of state and other officials through tweeting and so on.
And so we see the two presidents, largely running the relationship.
Xi is now ready to welcome President Trump all the more powerful.
JOHN YANG: And in his 3.5-hour speech to the Party Congress last week, President Xi talked
about the great rejuvenation.
He wants to make China a global power...
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: Right.
JOHN YANG: ... at a time when President Trump is pulling away the U.S. influence on the
global stage.
How is that going to play?
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: Well, it will be interesting to watch.
There's no doubt that President Xi sees opportunity in President Trump's isolationism, as some
would put it.
Right from the beginning, when the president was elected, there's a reason why Xi Jinping
went to the Davos summit and talked about China's role increasingly as a defender of
global rules and norms and multinationalism and climate change and global agenda.
This doesn't ring true when you look at it on the surface, but if the U.S. is pulling
back, and China sees an opportunity, they are stepping into that vacuum.
And Xi Jinping is telling us, China not only expects to be a global power.
They are already one and will start acting like one.
JOHN YANG: Is there anything that happened in the Party Congress that concerns you about
U.S.-China relations?
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: You know, one of the things I think is potentially important is,
Xi Jinping made a point of talking about this island building that they have doing in the
South China Sea.
Now, this is typically something where China has conducted this activity, but not wanted
to draw attention to it.
Xi Jinping talked proudly about it in his speech.
This can be a dog whistle, if you will, for conservative elements here in the United States
who believe that China is eagerly trying to push the United States out of the region.
JOHN YANG: And you mentioned that the -- that President Xi talks about multinational trading
systems.
And he also talks about climate change, both areas where President Trump is pulling away.
Are there areas of possible cooperation between the United States and China?
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: I think the main area to look at is the economic relationship.
President Trump is sure to tell President Xi, I need more help on the trade balance
issue, and if you don't help me, I'm going to come after you through trade penalties
and remedies.
Xi Jinping has an opportunity.
He's signaling a desire to slow down China's economy.
This will be good for the United States and the globe, in that concerns about a Chinese
financial crisis that could cause us all a lot of trouble could be modified.
JOHN YANG: Will this have any impact on Mr. Trump's desire to get China to help him with
North Korea?
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: I think he will seek to indicate to Xi Jinping, OK, you have all
the power now.
Why don't you help me more on this issue?
There's been a sort of narrative in the past that Xi Jinping or any other Chinese leader
on North Korea has been constrained by hard-line influences in the military who remember fondly
China's support for North Korea and in the Korean war.
If Xi Jinping is really as powerful as he says, there should be nothing standing in
his way of being more supportive on the North Korea issue.
So, the real question is, does Xi Jinping himself want to help the United States on
the issue?
JOHN YANG: Briefly, as Xi consolidates his power, as he did at the Party Congress, are
we moving toward sort of a cult of personality like Mao?
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: I don't think so.
There's been a lot of debate about this, whether Xi Jinping is a power-mad megalomaniac like
Mao Zedong.
I think he's a pragmatist, and he has demonstrated that several times.
He doesn't look like someone who wants to cling on to power forever, and he's not been
someone who has acted in a whimsical way, like Mao.
Xi Jinping has a plan, and we have been watching him steadily execute it over the last five
years, and he will continue to do so going forward.
JOHN YANG: Christopher Johnson, thanks for joining us to help us understand all of this.
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON: My pleasure.
-------------------------------------------
John Kelly Lies To Cover For Trump - Duration: 12:50.
WE ARE SEVERAL DAYS INTO THIS INSANE FEUD THAT HAS DEVELOPED
OUT OF THE MILITARY SITUATION IN NIGER A COUPLE WEEKS AGO, IT'S
GONE THROUGH MULTIPLE ITERATIONS AND THE LATEST ONE WE ARE ON IS
THERE'S A CONCERTED EFFORT COMING OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE TO
DISCREDIT THE CONGRESSWOMAN, FREDERICA WILSON, BECAUSE SHE
HAPPENED TO BE PRESENT FOR A PRESIDENTIAL PHONE CALL TO THE
WIDOW OF A SOLDIER SLAIN IN THE FIELD.
AND THE WILLINGNESS TO
PLAY FAST AND LOOSE ABOUT FACTS WITH BEACHES THAT HAVE BEEN
GIVEN COMING NOT JUST FROM DONALD TRUMP WHERE WE WOULD
EXPECT IT BUT OUT OF GENERALS LIKE JOHN KELLY IS CERTAINLY
DISAPPOINTING, SO WE WILL SHOW HOW THE MOST RECENT ATTACK BY
JOHN KELLY DURING HIS EMOTIONAL SPEECH YESTERDAY ABOUT WHAT IT'S
LIKE TO BE A FATHER WHO HAS LOST A SOLDIER IN COMBAT, WE WILL
BREAK DOWN SOME OF THE MISTRUTHS THAT WERE SPREAD.
BUT IN CASE YOU DIDN'T SEE IT HERE IS JOHN KELLY.
>>THE CONGRESSWOMAN STOOD UP, AND IN THE LONG TRADITION OF
EMPTY BARRELS MAKING THE MOST NOISE, SHE TALKED ABOUT HOW SHE
WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN GETTING THE FUNDING FOR THAT BUILDING, AND
HOW SHE CALLED THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA AND HE GAVE HER THE MONEY
TO BUILD THAT BUILDING, AND SHE SAT DOWN.
WE WERE STUNNED,
STUNNED, THAT SHE HAD DONE IT.
EVEN FOR SOMEONE THAT IS THAT
EMPTY A BARREL, WE WERE STUNNED.
BUT NONE OF US WENT TO THE PRESS
AND CRITICIZED.
NONE OF US STOOD UP AND WERE APPALLED.
WE JUST SAID OKAY, FINE.
>> THAT'S A TOTALLY ORGANIC NOT PLANNED NARRATIVE WHEN YOU USE
THE EXPRESSION EMPTY BARREL THREE TIMES IN A MINUTE.
ALSO
SAYING STUNNED SHE WOULD LISTEN IN ON THE CALL.
THERE'S A
COMPLETE LACK OF INTEREST IN ACTUALLY UNDERSTANDING THE
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THIS CONGRESSWOMAN AND NOT JUST THE
WIDOW BUT THE SOLDIER WHO WAS KILLED, IT WOULD ALLOW YOU TO
UNDERSTAND WHY THIS PLAYED OUT THE WAY IT DID THAT THEN WE WILL
GET TO THE SUBSTANCE, WE WILL PLAY THE SPEECH THAT SHOWS HOW
WRONG HE WAS, BUT THERE IS THIS INABILITY IN THE WHITE HOUSE TO
UNDERSTAND WHEN YOU'VE MADE A LITTLE ERROR AND SIMPLY KILL IT
JUST BY APOLOGIZING, MOVING ON, THEY HAVE TO DOUBLE DOWN AND
DONALD TRUMP'S NEED TO DO THAT DRAWS IN PEOPLE LIKE JOHN KELLY
INTO GIVING A SPEECH LIKE THAT THAT I'M SURE HE HAD NO INTEREST
IN GIVING.
BUT HE SAYS THAT SHE'S AN EMPTY BARREL,
GRANDSTANDING, APPARENTLY THIS RECENT SITUATION IS JUST AN
EXAMPLE BECAUSE YOU CAN GO BACK AND SEE OTHER EXAMPLES LIKE WHEN
SHE TOOK CREDIT FOR THIS FBI BUILDING.
HERE IS THE ACTUAL SPEECH SHE GAVE THAT SHE WAS ALLUDING TO.
>> THE BRAND-NEW FEDERAL BUILDING THAT WILL HOUSE THE FBI
HAS BEEN BUILT, AND THE FBI APPROACHES MY OFFICE.
CONGRESSWOMAN WILSON THE RIBBON-CUTTING IS SCHEDULED IN
FOUR SHORT WEEKS, THE DEDICATION IS ON THE GOVERNMENT'S CALENDAR
AND CANNOT BE CHANGED.
ONE PROBLEM, THE FBI WANTS TO NAME
THIS GORGES EDIFICE AT THE SAME TIME IN FOUR WEEKS.
EVERYONE
SAID THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE.
IT TAKES AT LEAST EIGHT MONTHS TO A YEAR
TO COMPLETE THE PROCESS THROUGH THE HOUSE, THE SENATE, AND TO
THE PRESIDENT'S OFFICE.
I'M A SCHOOL PRINCIPAL, AND I SAID
EXCUSE MY FRENCH, HELL NO, WE ARE GOING TO GET THIS DONE.
IMMEDIATELY I WENT TO ATTACK MODE, I SAID MR.
SPEAKER, I NEED
YOUR HELP, THE FBI NEEDS HER HELP, THE COUNTRY NEEDS HER
HELP, WE HAVE NO TIME TO WASTE.
HE WENT INTO ATTACK MODE, AND IN
TWO DAYS HE PULLED IT OUT OF COMMITTEE, BROUGHT IT TO THE
FLOOR FOR A VOTE, REPRESENTATIVES PRESENTED IT, WE
ALL VOTED AND I DASHED IT OVER TO THE SENATE AND PUT THE
SENATORS ON NOTICE, PUT IT ON YOUR RADAR.
SENATOR NELSON AND
SENATOR RUBIO, WHO I BELIEVE HAVE REPRESENTED OF HERE TODAY,
THEY HOTLINED IT TO THE SENATE FLOOR IN JUST TWO DAYS, AND
GUESS WHAT?
THE PRESIDENT SIGNED THE BILL INTO LAW THIS PAST
TUESDAY, APRIL 7, 2015, WITH A BANG, BANG, BANG.
IT'S A MIRACLE
TO SAY THE LEAST, BUT IT SPEAKS TO THE RESPECT THAT OUR CONGRESS
HAS FOR THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, THE MEN AND WOMEN
WHO PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE EVERYTHING A DAY. AND TODAY WE
ARE PROVIDING A BOOST --
>>IT GOES ON LIKE THAT BUT WHAT YOU SEE IS THAT SHE IS TALKING
ABOUT THE PROCESS, AT THIS DEDICATION, OF GETTING SOME
ADDITIONAL FUNDING, AND TO THE EXTENT THAT SHE IS
GRANDSTANDING, SHE'S ALSO GIVING CREDIT TO BASICALLY EVERYONE
ELSE ALONG THE WAY.
>>SHE IS QUITE INCLUSIVE.
>>IT WAS AN ANECDOTE ABOUT FINALIZING SOMETHING FOR THE
BUILDING, AND NOT WHAT GENERAL KELLY SAYS, CLAIMING SHE GOT THE
MONEY TO BUILD THE BUILDING.
YOU COULD SAY SHE'S GIVING A
RAMBLING ANECDOTE, THAT'S WHAT POLITICIANS DO UNFORTUNATELY,
BUT TO SAY THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF HER TRYING TO TAKE CREDIT FOR
EVERYTHING AND TRY TO DISCREDIT HER, SAYING YOU CAN'T BELIEVE
SHE REPRESENTS THIS WIDOW WHO HAS COME OUT AND CONFIRMED THAT
TRUMP SAID WHAT HE SAID, TRUMP'S OWN PEOPLE HAVE CONFIRMED HE
SAID IT, AND THEY ARE ATTEMPTING TO MUDDY THE WATERS AND
CONFUSE YOU ABOUT THE WHOLE THING.
>>JUST AS A TESTAMENT TO THE ANECDOTE SHE WAS GIVING, JAMES
COMEY WAS AT THAT CEREMONY AS WELL, AND IN HIS PREPARED
REMARKS HE DISCUSSED THE IMPORTANCE OF IT HAVING A NAME
FOR THE DEDICATION AND HOW QUICKLY THE CONGRESSWOMAN WAS
ABLE TO PROVIDE THE INITIAL BOOST TO GET THAT TO HAPPEN, IT
WAS A BIG DEAL FOR THEM.
IT WASN'T OUT OF LEFT FIELD, IT WAS
PART OF THEIR PREPARED REMARKS.
GOES BACK TO THE FACT THAT THIS
IS A REFLECTION OF, AND I KNOW THIS IS AN EASY GO TO BUT IT'S
ALSO TRUE, OF WHAT TRUMP'S M.O. IS, TO CASH IN ON OTHER PEOPLE
AND MAKE THEM SUBJUGATE THEMSELVES.
AT EVERY EVENT KELLY
SAYS NOT A SINGLE WORD, HE JUST POINTS TO THE PRESIDENT AND
CLAPS AND EVERYONE CHEERS AND HE WALKS AWAY.
HE HAD TO GIVE THIS
SPEECH, JUST LIKE TILLERSON HAD TO DO IT THREE WEEKS AGO, I
DIDN'T SAY HE WAS A MORON.
>>AND THEN EVENTUALLY HE CASTS THEM OFF.
>>HE BURNS THEIR CREDIBILITY DOWN AND MOVES ON, THAT'S
OUR AFFECTION OF HIS OVERALL APPROACH.
>>I WISH THERE HADN'T BEEN THIS WEIRD TENSION IN THE NEWS BUT I
THINK IT'S IMPORTANT ESPECIALLY FOR TRUMP SUPPORTERS TO
UNDERSTAND THAT, FORGET ABOUT THE JOHN KELLY AND THE WILSON
THING, THE DISRESPECT GIVEN ROUTINELY FROM DONALD TRUMP TO
THE GOLDSTAR FAMILIES AND ALL THAT, THAT IS IMPORTANT, I DON'T
KNOW THAT IT WILL PENETRATE AND HIS SUPPORTERS WILL BE AFFECTED
BY IT, HE'S BEEN ROUTINELY DISRESPECTFUL TO THE MILITARY
FOR MANY YEARS AT THIS POINT, BUT HOPEFULLY ONCE THIS HAS BEEN
RESOLVED WE CAN GET BACK TO THE REAL STORY WHICH IS WHAT
ACTUALLY HAPPENED IN AFRICA, HOW WE GOT TO THAT SITUATION.
NOT
JUST WHAT HAPPENED THAT NIGHT, BUT WHY THAT SITUATION
DEVELOPED.
LAST NIGHT I BELIEVE RACHEL MADDOW TALKED ABOUT SOME
OF THE POLICY DECISIONS THAT MIGHT HAVE LED TO THAT, HAVING
TO DO WITH CHAD AND SOME OF THAT, BUT THAT'S AN INTERESTING
SITUATION.
THE REASON WE HAVE THIS TENTED IS BECAUSE TRUMP
REFUSED TO GO ON RECORD ABOUT WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED ON THE
GROUND, AND IT MIGHT WELL BE, I SAW THIS EDITORIAL, DON'T MAKE
THIS SITUATION INTO TRUMP'S BENGHAZI -- BUT I THINK THIS IS
EXACTLY LIKE BENGHAZI.
NOT WHAT BENGHAZI BECAME, BUT WHAT IT
WAS, A MILITARY SITUATION THAT
GOT OUT OF CONTROL, THERE IS NO
HUGE CONSPIRACY, THERE'S JUST IRRESPONSIBILITY AND POOR
DECISION-MAKING.
AND TRUMP MADE IT SO MUCH WORSE BECAUSE HE REFUSED TO BE
FORTHCOMING.
>> WHEN THIS WAS FIRST HAPPENING I THOUGHT, I HOPE THE PRESIDENT
WILL ASK ABOUT WHY OUR TROOPS ARE THERE AND WHAT THE MISSION
WAS ABOUT.
THAT'S NOT WHAT HAPPENED, IT ENDED UP BEING A
WHOLE QUESTION OF HOW COME YOU WAITED SO LONG TO CALL THE
FAMILIES, IT TURNED INTO WHAT WE'VE JUST BEEN TALKING ABOUT.
BUT THE SPECIFICS ALSO OF HOW TRUMP HAS TARNISHED, AND HOW
KELLY AND THIS ADMINISTRATION, HAVE TARNISHED THIS
CONGRESSWOMAN, HOW SHE WAS LISTENING IN ON THE CALL.
THERE'S A SENSE THAT EVERYONE IS SITTING AROUND AND SHE'S
LISTENING IN ON THE EXTENSION --
>>THE
WIDOW PUT IT ON SPEAKERPHONE, SORRY, SHE GETS TO DO THAT.
>> SHE WAS DRIVING TO PICK UP THE CORPSE OF HER DEAD SON, AND
THE CONGRESSWOMAN WAS ACCOMPANYING HER, AND THE CALL
CAME IN AND IT WAS ON THE SPEAKERPHONE, THERE'S NOTHING
DAMNING ABOUT THAT SCENARIO, AND IT EXPLAINS THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN THE CONGRESSWOMAN AND THE FAMILY AND THE FALLEN
SOLDIER.
BUT THE FACT THAT IT HAS BEEN POLITICIZED, TO USE THE
OVERUSED WORD, BUT IT'S APPROPRIATE -- BUT ALSO THAT IT
HAS BEEN USED TO SOMEHOW TARNISH THIS PROUD FAMILY AND THIS
CONGRESSWOMAN, IS ABHORRENT TO ME.
>>THIS WHOLE SITUATION IS IMPORTANT BUT I AGREE, AT SOME
POINT THE REAL STORY, EVEN OUTSIDE OF THIS INCIDENT, IT'S
THE CONTEXTUAL BATTLE GOING ON IN THIS REGION, I BELIEVE TODAY,
I FORGET WHO IT WAS, A SENATOR, MAYBE LINDSEY GRAHAM, TALKING
ABOUT HOW THE WAR HAS SHIFTED TO AFRICA, IT'S COMPLICATED,
MULTIPLE COUNTRIES BORDERING NIGER HAVING TERRORIST GROUPS
THAT ARE ALIGNED WITH ISIS, PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THAT,
THERE HAS TO BE A CONVERSATION ABOUT THE NUMBER OF TROOPS
THERE, HOW DO WE ACCESS IF IT HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL, ARE WE
SIMPLY GOING TO LEAVE THEM FOR YEARS ON END?
HOW MANY TROOPS
ARE THERE, IS IT 100 OR 1000, THAT SEEMS IMPORTANT.
AND WE ARE
STILL WAITING FOR INFORMATION TO COME OUT ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR
INCIDENT, IT WILL COME OUT, THERE IS AN INVESTIGATION
ONGOING, BUT IN PARTICULAR THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR THAT SENT THE
RESCUE, THE HELICOPTER, IF IT WAS THEIR FAULT FOR LEAVING
BEHIND A SOLDIER WE NEED TO KNOW THAT, AND WE HAVE BEEN LONG
OVERDUE FOR A LARGER CONVERSATION ABOUT THE ROLE OF
PRIVATE MILITARY CONTRACTORS IN OUR OPERATIONS, AND MAYBE
THIS COULD LEAD TO THAT.
>>I'M GLAD YOU MENTIONED PRIVATE CONTRACTORS BECAUSE QUICKLY,
THERE IS A BIG MOVE, ERIC PRINCE, THE BLACKWATER HEAD,
THEY ARE THE BIG CONTRACTORS WHO MADE OUT LIKE CRAZY ON THE IRAQ
WAR, HE'S PUSHING FOR THE PRIVATIZATION OF ALL OF THESE
WARS.
THAT WE CONTRACT ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT THINGS OUT.
THAT
NOW IS THE TIME TO PRIVATELY CONTRACT ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT
SKIRMISHES AND WAR THEATERS OUT. AND THIS IS THE MINISTRATION TO
HELP HIM DO IT.
IF EVER THERE WAS A TIME IN THIS COUNTRY WHEN
WE WOULD HAND OVER THE KEYS TO OUR MILITARY TO PRIVATE
CONTRACTORS, IT IS NOW.
SO KEEP YOUR EYE ON THAT BALL IS THIS
ENTIRE DEBATE CONTINUES.
ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE
MILITARY, KEEP YOUR EYE ON THE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR PART OF
THAT EQUATION.
-------------------------------------------
Trump: Due Process Is For White People, Gitmo Is For Muslims - Duration: 3:36.
WE FOUND OUT TODAY HOW THEY ARE GOING TO RESPOND TO THE
ATTACK YESTERDAY.
IT IS NOT JUST GOING AFTER THIS DIVERSITY VISA LOTTERY PROGRAM.
TRUMP ALSO TOLD REPORTERS THIS.
THAT IS GOOD.
THE WHITE HOUSE ALSO SAID THIS.
HE IS A GUY THAT WAS IN NEW YORK.
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT HE IS AN ENEMY COMBATANT?
I WANT YOU TO COME TO GRIPS WITH THE IDEA THAT DONALD TRUMP
GETS TO LABEL PEOPLE ENEMY COMBATANTS NOW.
A WHILE BACK A COUPLE OF RIGHT-WINGERS WENT AND SHOT
A COUPLE OF POLICE OFFICERS IN NEVADA.
THEY SAID THEY WERE DOING IT FOR POLITICAL REASONS AND THEY LAID
THE GATSON FLAG ON THEIR BODIES.
NOW YOU MIGHT HAVE HEARD ABOUT THAT STORY OR BARELY BECAUSE IF
IT IS A NON-MUSLIM WE DON'T GO WALL-TO-WALL WITH COVERAGE.
AND TALK ABOUT IT FOR LIKE A DAY.
SO THAT IS BASICALLY HOW THAT STORY WAS TREATED.
SHOULD WE HAVE TAKEN THOSE GUYS AND PUT THEM INTO GITMO AND
TREAT THEM AS ENEMY COMBATANTS?
OF COURSE NOT.
THEY ARE HERE, IT IS ON AMERICAN SOIL AND THEY COMMITTED AN ACT.
UNLIKE DONALD TRUMP I BELIEVE IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM.
IT HAS A LOT OF ISSUES AND I WANT TO MAKE IT MUCH BETTER.
BUT OVERALL DO I BELIEVE THAT DEFENDANTS SHOULD HAVE RIGHTS?
YES.
HABEAS CORPUS?
YES.
I BELIEVE IN OUR CONSTITUTION AND JUSTICE SYSTEM.
I BELIEVE IT CAN BRING THOSE MONSTERS AND ABOUT THE
JUSTICE AND THIS MONSTER IN NEW YORK TO JUSTICE.
IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM AND YOU DON'T
BELIEVE IN OUR FORMER GOVERNMENT, THEN YOU SHOULD
NOT LEAD IT.
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT HIM ANNOUNCING THAT HE THINKS OUR
JUSTICE SYSTEM IS A JOKE AND A LAUGHINGSTOCK?
DO YOU THINK YOU
TALKING ABOUT THOSE WELL REASONED CRITICISM OF SYSTEMIC
RACISM OR HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT WE
REALIZE THIS WEEK THAT THREE OF HIS CAMPAIGN STAFF
INCLUDING HIS FORMER CAMPAIGN CHAIRMAN HAVE BEEN ARRESTED?
I'M SURE HE'S TALKING ABOUT THE TWO-TIER JUSTICE SYSTEM
WHERE PEOPLE WITH AFFLUENZA GETTING OFF FOR KILLING PEOPLE.
BUT IF YOU ARE POOR AND YOU SMOKED A JOINT YOU WILL GO
TO PRISON FOR 20 YEARS.
HE'S TALKING ABOUT OVERCROWDED PRISONS AND ñ
HE'S NOT TALKING TO ANY OF THAT, HE'S SAYING I AM
POWERFUL, HOW DARE YOU ARREST THE RICH AND POWERFUL.
AND IN THIS GUY WHO WAS A TERRIBLE HUMAN BEING WHO
SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE IN NEW YORK SAYS I DON'T BELIEVE
IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM, I HATE THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM.
TRUMP SAID IT WAS A LAUGHINGSTOCK.
HE HATES OUR
SYSTEM AND HE SAYS I DON'T BELIEVE IN IT AND WANTS TO
SEND HIM TO GITMO BECAUSE GITMO IS LAWLESS.
HE BELIEVES IN LAWLESSNESS MORE THAN IN AMERICA AND OUR
CONSTITUTION.
THIS GUY IS NOT FIT TO BE A LEADER BECAUSE HE DOESN'T
EVEN BELIEVE IN THE CONCEPT OF THE COUNTRY.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét