Thứ Ba, 28 tháng 11, 2017

Waching daily Nov 28 2017

My name is Kennedy. I'm 21 years old and I am adopted

I was adopted by my birth mother's sister and her husband

My mom and dad had no idea that I even existed until three days after I was born

I never knew that I wasn't my parents biological child until the week that my adoption was legalized I

Always say that even though I didn't grow in my mom's stomach I grew in her heart I

Was absolutely shocked when I found out that I was adopted

People often ask me. How my parents were able to love and care for me as if I was their own child I

Am their own child

They raised me. They showed me how to be compassionate and they provided me with an education

No matter who gave me life in the physical sense the people who took on the role of being my parents are my parents

The older I get the more attention I paid to how adoption is portrayed in the media

At least once a week I turn on the TV or open a magazine

And hear about the struggle of a family who is having a hard time conceiving a child

But you never really hear adoption as a first option

What saddens me is the fact that so many people view adoption as a last resort

I

was adopted

I'm not a last resort

I'm not a charity case

Adopting a child does not make you any less of a parent all that matters is the love that you give them

There are approximately

73 million children in America out of these 73 million

over 400,000 are in foster care and

100,000 are waiting to be adopted

Just remember that adoption is always an option

For more infomation >> ADOPTION IS ALWAYS AN OPTION // AN ADOPTEE'S POV - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

Why E=mc² is wrong - Duration: 6:07.

There is perhaps only one equation in all of physics that almost everyone knows- and

that equation is E equals m c squared.

When you get down to it, it's actually pretty amazing that this particular equation is so

well known. After all, it makes a pretty weird assertion, which is that energy is the same

as matter. I mean- that's what that equal sign says.

So, given that the equation is so familiar, it's probably worth asking the question:

Is it right?

And the answer will probably shock you. It's no- or, perhaps more accurately- the equation

is a special case. In order to use it properly you need to know more.

Now I don't want my email inbox to explode because I said that E equals m c squared is

wrong. And you shouldn't think that I'm saying something controversial here. Anyone

who has mastered special relativity will agree. The problem is not with the theory, but rather

simply how the well understood theory of relativity is portrayed in popular culture.

So, if E equals m c squared is wrong, what's right? It turns out that there are two more

accurate, but similar equations. Let me tell you about both of them.

The first one looks pretty similar. It is E equals gamma times m times c squared. I

made another video in which I talked about relativistic mass, which introduced this gamma

term, and I made yet another video that talked specifically about gamma. You can watch those

if you want to learn more about it.

However, I can give you the high points. Gamma is a term that is ubiquitous in relativity.

It is defined as one over the square root of the quantity one minus v squared divided

by c squared. V is an object's velocity relative to you and c is the speed of light.

If v is zero, then gamma is just one. So that's your first insight- E equals m c squared is

only correct if an object isn't moving with respect to you.

And, as an object's velocity increases towards c, gamma gets higher and higher and the energy

of the object increases. Note that the mass doesn't increase, but the energy does.

This is a particularly important to realize, because I don't know how many times people

tell me that since energy and mass are the same, then a highly energetic object is also

a massive one, at least not in the way most of these people mean. It's just not true.

So get that misconception out of your head.

There's another aspect of this equation that people get at least kinda-sorta wrong.

If you keep the energy constant, but reduce the mass of the object, then the gamma must

increase. And if you take the mass all the way down to zero, then the velocity must become

the speed of light, since gamma must become infinite. This is because you start getting

into mathematical tricks, where infinity times zero equals a constant.

So that kind of works in calculus, but invoking infinities in physics is usually a very bad

idea.

Thus this equation doesn't really apply for photons, which are massless particles

of light. Indeed- and this is an important point- this equation only applies for particles

with mass and for speeds below the speed of light.

Now there is another equation that applies universally for both particles with and without

mass, and that equation is here. It is E squared equals p times c, all squared, plus m c squared,

again all squared.

The meaning of the symbols is e is energy, m is mass- what some people call the rest

mass, but is really the only value for mass- c is the speed of light, and p is the momentum,

which is a measure of the motion of a particle.

Let's see what happens in the case of a particle not moving, which means setting the

momentum to zero. Voila, you get the familiar equation E equals m c squared.

Now, let's set the mass of a particle to zero, which, of course, describes a photon.

We see here that the equation turns into E equals p times c, which is the correct relationship

between the energy and momentum of a photon. That's pretty snazzy too.

Further, this equation demonstrates precisely why using the E equals m c squared equation

for photons is just simply silly. If you do that, small children will laugh at you. So

don't do that.

By the way, there's one additional point that I'd like to make. Let's go back to

the other equation relating energy to mass– the E equals gamma m c squared one. Yeah-

that one.

Commenters in previous videos asked for physical meaning for gamma and this is at least the

way I think of it. Remember that m c squared is the energy of a particle at rest. In contrast,

E is its energy while it's moving. Thus, gamma is simply the ratio of the total energy of

a particle to its energy when it isn't moving. Since particle physics experiments often measure

a particle's energy, I find this particular physical implication of gamma to be the most

useful.

So that's it! Einstein's most famous equation is true, but it's actually a special case

of equations that apply more generally. And now, you know how to do it the right way.

Relativity is really pretty mind blowing, no doubt about that. And it's misused so

often. I hope that this video helped you out. If it did, please like, subscribe and share

and tell all your friends- we have to get our numbers up! And feel free to comment.

We want to hear what you have to say. So, see you next time, and remember- physics is

everything.

For more infomation >> Why E=mc² is wrong - Duration: 6:07.

-------------------------------------------

Meghan's Heartbreak as She is Forced to Leave One of Her Dogs in Canada | Because Her Fly to The UK - Duration: 2:08.

mehgan's heartbreak as she is forced to leave one of her dogs in Canada because

he is too old to fly to the UK kensington palace confirms megan

Markel's dog Bogart will not come to UK spokesman said the Labrador Shepherd

cross was living with Friends of actress but her beagle guy has travelled to the

UK and will live with the happy couple miss Marcal is well known for showing

your love of the pets on Instagram Megan Markel has made a heartbreaking decision

to leave one of her beloved dogs behind after moving to the UK to start her new

life with fiance Prince Harry the American actress has two rescued dogs a

biggle guy and a labrador Shepherd cross Bogart who she would keep in touch with

via FaceTime during her long stints away Kensington Palace confirmed guy has come

to the UK and has legal permission to stay here but Bogaerts has been left

behind Megan Markel is separating from one of

her beloved rescue dogs after Kensington Palace confirmed Labrador Shepherd

crossbow gar pictured top would not be coming to the UK the palace confirmed

Bogart would be staying in Canada with friends of miss Marcal while beagle guy

bottom would come to stay with a newly engaged couple it has prompted

speculation from fans on social media that Bogar may have been left behind

because he is too big or too old to fly to the UK many animal lovers have

expressed their sadness online at the pet being separated from miss Marcal the

princes Communications secretary Jason Knopf said Bogart is now living with

friends the palace refused to speculate as to why Bogart was not brought to the

UK and added the decision would have lots of complexity to it while

confirming miss Marcal remains fond of her dogs

For more infomation >> Meghan's Heartbreak as She is Forced to Leave One of Her Dogs in Canada | Because Her Fly to The UK - Duration: 2:08.

-------------------------------------------

I'm A Celebrity 2017 Is THIS the winner You won't believe who comes out on top - Duration: 2:53.

For more infomation >> I'm A Celebrity 2017 Is THIS the winner You won't believe who comes out on top - Duration: 2:53.

-------------------------------------------

Love is a Vibration - Aimee Eoff - Duration: 16:04.

For more infomation >> Love is a Vibration - Aimee Eoff - Duration: 16:04.

-------------------------------------------

The 4 Week Diet System By Brian Flatt Review - Is Brian Flatt's 4 Week Diet A Scam? - Duration: 40:10.

For more infomation >> The 4 Week Diet System By Brian Flatt Review - Is Brian Flatt's 4 Week Diet A Scam? - Duration: 40:10.

-------------------------------------------

Bill Clinton Is Asked About Franken Scandal, Looks at Reporter and Smiles - Duration: 3:35.

Bill Clinton Is Asked About Franken Scandal, Looks at Reporter and Smiles

Nearly 20 years since his own sexual scandal, former President Bill Clinton refuses to speak about ongoing sexual harassment and assault allegations against lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

According to The Washington Free Beacon, Clinton smirked when asked to give his opinion on Sen. Al Frankens sexual misconduct scandal.

NBC news correspondent Tammy Leitner was in Puerto Rico to cover Clintons visit to the country, who was there to survey damage left by the recent hurricanes.

When Leitner asked Clinton what he thought about Sen. Frankens scandal, he paused, smirked at her, and went on with his day.

Leitner then went on national television to describe his reaction. During a talkback with MSNBC host Kasie Hunt, Hunt asked Leitner if she had spoken with Clinton about the allegations.

Tammy, I want to ask you one more thing quickly on a slightly different topic since had you a chance to talk to Bill Clinton, Hunt said.

He has been back in the news with the senator from New York, Kirsten Gillibrand, suggesting he would have had to resign in the current climate and, of course, Democrats facing questions about Senator Al Frankens conduct.

Any chance you talked to him about that? Hunt asked. Leitner paused, let out a nervous laugh and then responded.

I did, Kasie.

I asked him about the senators recent comments, and he looked at me, kind of half-smirked, and kept going, Leitner said.

He wanted nothing to do with that, so he didnt give us an answer, she continued. Hunt quickly responded: Cant imagine why..

Is anyone really shocked by Clintons refusal to answer any questions about sexual misconduct allegations?. This is the same man who had relations with a White House intern when she was just 21-years-old.

He thought it was fine then, and he probably still thinks he did nothing wrong. He is the same then as he is now: creepy, corrupt, and simply put – slimy.

Share this story on Facebook and Twitter with your thoughts on this interaction between Bill Clinton and NBCs Tammy Leitner.

What do you think of Clintons strange response? Scroll down to comment below!.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét