-------------------------------------------
KID SINGS "Let It Go" FOR FREE WHITE ZOMBAS! *CRINGY* - Kids Sing For Free Items in Rocket League - Duration: 9:06.
do you want to be entered in a chance to win a new certified heatwave I'll then
go down and smash that like button and subscribe click the Bell notification
and turn on my post notifications I don't leave me some good feedback on the
video good luck to everybody who enters enjoy the video the beat and co-star is
down ok
guys it's Rachel here in today's video we are going to be queuing a thing for
my way zombozo we're gonna be seeing if people actually would sing for my way
down but we're going to get some reactions and I hope the reactions are
as good as last time was last time they were like like they were freaking funny
but yeah let's get straight into this video I mean like you can do whatever
you want you could sing whatever song you want shut about time you like a
popular song and if I need to turn off I'm gonna sub thanks man
I'm going to sing that shape with you I'm going to put the lyrics and the song
like this song goodness and light you
know you know I want your love love man days for somebody like me I'm not using
that okay the show honey please let's not talk too much Omaha is called please
if I'm in love you got party last night you in my room
I'm again she's my life in summer it's up to read I love you bud
I get in my heart I don't know what on my way Stefani owe me from now formally
can come enough I'm sorry I'm alone with the shaker just ten grand
I'm in love you bye while I was okay my baby I'll see my babies soompi my babies
I love you wanna give you some raisin bran
I love the shape
okay John Martin right did you stop isn't your call plan I like Drake
English me I don't hide where I'm rolled right now both yeah had a dick yes nope
yeah you think I did you but I don't go around you got my fault
over water whether it is remote I always let some junk gone hi but um bullaiah
now gummy talk about my life I should be reformed wrong oh hi butter balls right
now I usually do this from John oh hi little
balls right now HIPAA okay do the next okay
you know she played the fiddle an Irish bench and in love with an Englishman
Eastern neck and then let's go by the hands and baby here just wanna dance
little political where you go go away yeah it's also like a society okay okay
yeah I aren't here guys they look like a frozen Legos alright
here we go let me just get I'm gonna get background music for it the slurring my
is my don't answer tonight the other bridge everything a kingdom of isolation
and it looks like one Queen so let them through let them see be the good girl
you're ingesting it can still serve soon so let them know I know buddy
very good yo wait what that was the best thing
ever
the club is in the best place to find a loved us of the bar is where I go me and
my friend got the thing with three shots Trickett passed around took slow you
come over and start up a conversation with just me just me I'll give it a
chance now I'll take my hand stop there the
metallurgic box and then we start to dance and sing like girl you know one
show lo you love with Henry for somebody like me coming now follow my lead and
maybe crazy don't mind me sit boy let's not talk too
much grab up now we stay put then a buddy of
me coming out follow my lead go now my leafy I can't remember the rest of them
okay I see you flower lay down some is and you just get the wins over vision of
a person hopefully do it no way I'm
going to let his dog go them oppose it be anyway hey yo hey yo no right no
wrong no rules for me my god the thing is the sad thing is I don't
even have to look at the lyrics let's do it it's so what song are you saying your
part you'll find out it is ABC yes g h i j k okay you are ass CU v w x
y z wait where did the y go though no
okay b that would have been the winner but you messed up saying and late one
job i said and it sounded like you're gonna say V is any when twos and sorry
but it was a beaut like best song in the world alright guys it's pretty much
wraps up my video if you raise you like this video make sure to smash that like
button down below and if you guys are new to the Channel please subscribe down
below and make sure to turn on those posted occasions to be up to date videos
like rocket League videos on the channel and if you guys really do want to see my
last time I made people saying it was it like it was actually for my mantis so
I'm gonna link that up in the top right corner right now so you guys can see
that video so this is Richie go I'll see you guys in my next video
-------------------------------------------
Lake Champlain Chocolates debuts new bar for Burlington Jazz Fest - Duration: 1:07.
BRIAN, IT IS EXCITING
HERE.
PEOPLE ARE PICKING UP THE
PLAYBOOK.
THIS TELLS YOU EVERYTHING YOU
NEED TO KNOW ABOUT EVERYTHING
GOING ON.
THE NEXT THING THEY ARE DOING?
THEY ARE COMING TO TABLES LIKE
THIS WHERE ALL THE FOOD IS BEING
SET OUT AND YOU KNOW THIS IS
SOME GOOD FOOD.
YOU HAVE GOT TO GET YOUR
DESSERT.
WHERE ELSE TO GO BUT LAKE
CHAMPLAIN CHOCOLATES AND THE
BRAND-NEW PASSION IN THE DARK
CHOCOLATE BAR.
THIS WAS MAD SPECIFICALLY FOR
THIS YEAR'S DISCOVER JAZZ
FESTIVAL.
THEY DO THIS EVERY YEAR.
>> THIS IS FIELD WITH
PASSIONFRUIT CREAM AND PERUVIAN
DARK CHOCOLATE.
>> WE ARE GOING WITH A TROPICAL
THEME THIS YEAR.
-------------------------------------------
Baby Car Pom Pom I Bad Monster Trucks I Family Car Song I Fun For KidsTV Baby Girls Songs & Rhymes - Duration: 2:38.
You are watching Fun For Kids TV
Let's learn and have fun
Baby car, pom pom pom pom pom pom
Baby car!!
Sister car, pom pom pom pom pom pom
Sister car!!
Brother car, pom pom pom pom pom pom
Brother car!!
Momma car, pom pom pom pom pom pom
Momma car!!
Daddy car, pom pom pom pom pom pom
Daddy car!!
Monster trucks, pom pom pom pom pom pom
Monster trucks!!
We are safe, pom pom pom pom pom pom
We are safe!!
Ohh Yes we are !!
To watch more videos
Subscribe to Fun For Kids TV
-------------------------------------------
Kevin Durant Literally Shoots His NBA Finals Shot for Rihanna - Duration: 2:48.
What's up, guys?
Beija here for Complex News.
Game 1 of the 2017 NBA Finals took place last night, and while the Warriors walked away
with a 113-91 victory at Oracle Arena, a bigger storyline took place courtside between Rihanna
and Kevin Durant.
Rihanna is a diehard LeBron James fan, so naturally the 29-year-old pop star was rooting
for the Cavs to steal a Game 1 win.
This fact and her presence on the sideline turned into an entertaining narrative to watch
play out.
It all started when she apparently heckled Durant during a free throw attempt by yelling
"brick!"
Video from a different angle has since proved it wasn't Rihanna, but rather the woman sitting
next to her who tried to rattle KD at the line.
Regardless, fans on Twitter were amused by the moment.
Durant got revenge later in the game by hitting a three and locking eyes with RiRi:
Here's the shot from another angle:
After the game, Durant was asked about the stare down with Rihanna, and the Warriors
star denied it ever took place.
Props to Steph Curry for helping him address the situation that everyone is going to be
talking about until Game 2 on Sunday.
Rihanna wasn't too heartbroken after the loss.
In fact, she doubled down on LeBron and the Cavs' chances of winning the series.
This Kevin Durant and Rihanna rivalry is certainly unexpected, but entertaining as hell.
Our fingers are crossed that Rihanna sits courtside throughout the entire series.
That's the news for now, but for all the latest news on Rihanna and the NBA Finals,
subscribe to Complex News on YouTube.
For Complex News, I'm Beija Velez.
-------------------------------------------
Best Learning Videos for Kids Baby Cry and Learn Colors with Sea Animals Finger Family Compilation - Duration: 29:16.
Best Learning Videos for Kids Baby Cry and Learn Colors with Sea Animals Finger Family Compilation
-------------------------------------------
Global Ethics Forum: Toward Democracy: The Struggle for Self-Rule in European and American Thought - Duration: 27:08.
(soft music)
- Our speaker is James T. Kloppenberg,
and he is the Charles Warren Professor
of American History at Harvard
and teaches European and American intellectual history.
Today he will be discussing
his recently published magnum opus,
entitled Toward Democracy:
The Struggle for Self-Rule in European and American Thought.
- My history of democracy
in European and American thought
begins with Michel de Montaigne,
a French writer who lived during the wars of religion
that convulsed Europe throughout the 16th century.
From his chateau east of Bordeaux
in Southwestern France,
Montaigne could see the roaming bands
of Catholic and Protestant soldiers
that made life in the region
insecure for decades and sometimes made it a living hell.
If you visit Montaigne's chateau today,
you get a sense of the life that he lived.
In his study where he created the book of essays
that rank among the most important writings
of the early modern era,
you can still see painted on the beams of his ceiling
his watchwords, the words he lived by.
These include the words that he had inscribed
on a medal that he had cast for himself.
One side reads "Je m'abstiens"
or "I restrain myself"
and on the verso "Que sçais-je," "What do I know?"
Those qualities, restraint and humility,
lay at the heart of Montaigne's personal creed,
along with two other values,
his emphasis on autonomy or self-rule
and his ethic of reciprocity.
Those four values,
restraint, humility, autonomy, and reciprocity,
are central to my argument concerning
democracy as a way of life,
the conception of self-government
whose history I trace in Toward Democracy,
and that explains why I am so worried
about our current situation.
Some of these cultural preconditions are especially crucial.
Restraint, humility, and the ethic of reciprocity
are required if people are going to allow
their worst enemies to govern if they win an election.
That willingness is always fragile,
and it can be destroyed with disastrous consequences.
Think how rare those qualities have been.
Think how often elections in emerging democracies
just precipitate a new round of civil war
between rival ethnic groups,
or rival religious groups,
or groups inhabiting different regions
with different histories or traditions,
or groups loyal to a defeated leader.
The second principle of democracy
is a commitment to autonomy,
the independence of the individual
who internalizes and follows legal and ethical norms.
Without that commitment to autonomy,
majority rule is not enough
because any group of three can yield a majority of two
committed to enslaving the other one.
Yet all of these values,
restraint, humility, reciprocity, and autonomy,
like the principle of popular sovereignty itself,
are delicate and multidimensional cultural constructs,
internally unstable
and very difficult to fit together
using the blunt instrument of politics.
As if that weren't bad enough,
successful democracies depend on
preserving cultural resources
that the struggle to achieve democracy
erodes and sometimes destroys.
And to complicate matters further,
the successful achievement of democracy
has often unleashed forces
that can endanger the cultural resources
on which democracy depends,
a dynamic that we're watching play out in our own day.
The word democracy, as I'm sure many of you know,
descends from the Greek words for the people, the demos,
and power, kratos.
It has always meant popular government,
but for most of Western history
it has been a term of abuse,
not the almost universally accepted ideal
it has become in recent decades.
The word itself entered European discourse only in 1260
with the translation of Aristotle's Politics into Latin,
when the Dominican monks who were charged
with purifying Aristotle's pagan texts
invented the term democracia for popular government.
But widespread challenges to hierarchy
and to the rule of monarchy and aristocracy,
challenges that can properly be called democratic,
because they rested on new assertions about the capacity
of ordinary people,
such challenges emerged only in the 16th and 17th centuries,
when the ideas of Renaissance humanism
mingled with radical varieties of Christianity
to shake the foundations of European culture.
From the appearance of Thomas More's Utopia in 1516
to the peasant rebellions of the 1520s
and the rapid spread of Calvinism,
revolutionary ideas about the capacity of ordinary people
challenged prevailing practices of governance.
As religious warfare intensified
throughout Europe in the 16th century,
the contagious savagery that inspired
Montaigne's emphasis on restraint and humility
infected much of European culture.
The only alternative to endless carnage
appeared to be unchallengeable authority.
For that reason, the anti-democratic
ideas of royal absolutism
came to be the dominant force
in both the theory and the practice of politics.
Democracy in Europe and America
developed against the backdrop
of those murderous wars of religion
and the authoritarian regimes
that emerged to bring order to that chaos.
Early modern misgivings about popular government
have to be understood against the background
of violence perpetrated by ordinary people
against other ordinary people for more than a century.
I think that most scholars
have neglected that gruesome history
that lies behind the emergence of democracy,
a history of horrific violence,
and I think that's the reason why
we so complacently dismiss as elitism
the misgivings about democracy
that were expressed in the 17th and 18th centuries.
That might also explain why scholars today
fail to acknowledge just how revolutionary
the ideas and experiments
with limited or partial popular government were
in the context of those wars of religion.
American historians in the middle of the 20th century
took for granted that the story of America was,
among other things, a story of democracy.
Today, many American historians assume the opposite.
In one recent study, the only democratic communities
in early America are to be found aboard pirate ships.
It is now standard for historians of 18th-century America
to lament the shortcomings of the Revolution
and to treat the Constitution as a retreat from democracy.
I think those judgments are unbalanced.
The history of early America
contains a history of democracy,
and it's not a story of triumph,
but neither is it a fiction.
It is instead the history of struggles
between people with different
and often incompatible ideas
about autonomy, reciprocity,
authority, and community,
and, perhaps above all, about salvation.
In the early 17th century
few of those who engineered the institutions and practices
of popular government on either side of the Atlantic
thought of themselves as democrats.
They associated that idea with the absence of restraint,
with the degradation of government,
and with the indulgence of sin.
Even so, some of the first English settlers to North America
embraced for religious reasons the doctrine of self-rule
that had led them to emigrate from Anglican England
and establish their own communities of saints
in the harsh climate and isolation of New England.
Puritans such as Roger Williams and Thomas Hooker
set up self-governing colonies
in places like Providence and Hartford
to escape the authority of the Church of England
and that of people such as John Winthrop,
the governor of Massachusetts,
people who were just as firmly committed
to the idea of divine sovereignty
as Williams and Hooker
were to the idea of popular sovereignty.
It's sometimes forgotten
that some of the towns and colonies
established in the first half of the 17th century
self-consciously chose the word democracy
to describe the form of government
they were putting in place.
Whatever we might think of such colonies,
which excluded women from positions of authority
and permitted slave-owning,
these new settlements conceived of themselves
as democracies.
And I think we're missing something
if we fail to pay attention
to the reasons why they used that word.
Struggles developed within these colonies
almost immediately,
and important differences separated New England
from the colonies to their south.
But all of England's North American colonies
developed forms of self-rule
in their legislative assemblies,
even those that lacked
the particular institutions of town meeting
that were so pivotal in New England.
When Alexis de Tocqueville
visited the United States in the 1830s,
he called the New England town the cradle of democracy.
I think he was right.
At roughly the same time
that these New Englanders were experimenting
with forms of self-government in the 1630s and 1640s,
the ideas of religious dissenters back home
were plunging England into civil war.
The English Levellers, as they were called by their enemies,
argued for replacing monarchy
with forms of popular government
that were similar in important respects
to the experiments bubbling up across the Atlantic.
Whereas democrats in New England
became the leading figures of new colonies,
such as Providence and Hartford,
the ideas promulgated by the Levellers
led to the execution of King Charles I
and the bloody struggle in the English Civil War
that eventuated in the protectorate under Oliver Cromwell.
The Leveller leaders were imprisoned,
put to death,
or otherwise marginalized as dangerous radicals.
When the monarchy was restored in 1660 under Charles II,
the story of popular government in England
pretty much came to an end until,
well, until today,
when the monarchy, against all odds, is as popular as ever.
Not until the 20th century was the word democracy
used in mainstream English political life
as anything but an epithet.
My study of democracy provides
extensive analysis of the writings
of many prominent theorists and many less well-known people
who struggled to flesh out the meanings of democracy
as it developed over a long period of time
on both sides of the Atlantic.
I examined the staccato process
whereby ideas and proposals emerged and were debated,
experiments with democracy were conducted,
sometimes deliberately, sometimes inadvertently,
or for different purposes,
and the results were then assessed,
sometimes positively and just as often negatively.
To reiterate, radical ideas about self-rule,
ideas advanced in England by the Levellers,
by James Harrington, later by John Locke,
who was harried into exile,
and by Algernon Sidney, who was put to death,
those ideas were decisively rejected in England.
But in England's North American colonies
such ideas were not only embraced,
as they were by John Wise,
they were also institutionalized
and they were defended against royal authority.
Those were the ideas that later became the armature
of 18th-century American resistance to Britain.
In short, the seeds of America's democratic Revolution
were planted long before the 1760s and 1770s,
long before Alexander Hamilton met Aaron Burr.
Those seeds developed into different forms
depending on the institutional soil
and the cultural climates
prevailing in the different colonies,
but they all pointed in the direction of self-government.
The cluster of ideas characterized
as the 18th-century Enlightenment
certainly fed that process of growth.
My analysis of the Enlightenment
places America's democratic Revolution,
and perhaps even more controversially,
America's democratic Constitution,
in the framework of European ideas
that informed the Americans' thinking,
including the ideas of that notorious radical,
Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
Rousseau was much more influential in America
than has been recognized,
and that's one of the principal arguments of my book.
When Rousseau proposed actual,
rather than hypothetical, constitutional arrangements,
as he did when he was invited
to write frameworks for Poland and for Corsica,
he envisioned regimes of representative democracy.
He intended his idea of the general will,
which is often caricatured
as a blueprint for totalitarianism,
merely to clarify the difference between the common good,
by definition, what is in the public interest,
and the momentary will of the majority,
which he called the will of all,
which has to be measured against something more permanent,
something more enduring,
something more like a constitution
than a public opinion poll.
The constitutions that Rousseau
proposed for Poland and Corsica
were more similar to than different from
those that emerged from the English colonies
that separated from Britain in 1776
and the document produced by the Constitutional Convention
in Philadelphia in 1787.
The templates for the United States Constitution
were forged during the years of the Revolution,
when each of the colonies either revised its charter
to establish its own form of democratic government
or wrote a new constitution.
In tribute to his indispensable contributions
to the debates that led up to this break from England,
it was John Adams who was selected
to write the constitution for Massachusetts,
which remains 237 years later
the fundamental law of the commonwealth,
and it was this document that became the template
for four of the other constitutions that were then written.
The constitution that Adams framed,
as he himself wrote proudly,
was "Locke, Sidney, and Rousseau reduced to practice."
Its purpose was to promote the general will.
Disagreements among Americans
ran deep in the 1780s.
There was widespread dissatisfaction
with the flimsy union created by the
Articles of Confederation
that prompted the calling of the Constitutional Convention
in 1787.
Scholars in the last century have disagreed
about how we should understand that Constitution
almost as vigorously as Americans disagreed over it
during the debates over ratification.
But I think the best studies
of recent years
show that the Constitution cemented, rather than betrayed,
the new nation's commitment to democracy.
The two leading architects of the Constitution,
James Madison of Virginia and James Wilson of Pennsylvania,
from first to last saw themselves
as working for the creation
of a democratic form of government.
But they believed that a democracy could survive
only if the dual dangers of democracy,
unrest leading to anarchy
or the reestablishment of tyranny,
only if both of those could be harnessed
by democratic means.
From Madison's perspective,
the various checks and balances of the federal plan,
and especially the various filters
that operated from the local to the state
and then the national government, would do just that.
Those institutions would provide,
as Madison put it in the first speech he gave
in the Constitutional Convention,
"The only defense against the inconveniences of democracy
"consistent with a democratic form of government."
This was Madison's first speech
at the Constitutional Convention.
"What we want," he says,
"is a form of government that provides a defense
"against the inconveniences of democracy
"consistent with a democratic form of government."
Representative democracy would ensure
that only those whom Madison called virtuous,
by which he meant people capable
of seeing beyond narrow self-interest to the common good,
only those people would be chosen to serve
in positions of authority.
One of the principal objectives of my book is to establish,
or I would say more accurately to reestablish,
the essentially democratic nature
of the American Revolution and the US Constitution.
For the first century after its ratification,
no one in the United States or Europe
doubted that the United States
was the first democratic nation.
I think we need to pay attention to the reasons
why they made that judgment
rather than assuming that we were right and they were wrong.
Few scholars have realized that in Pennsylvania
at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia
Madison's principal ally, James Wilson,
wrote the most decisive and influential speeches
in favor of the Constitution
with a copy of Rousseau's Social Contract at his elbow.
The purpose of the Constitution,
as both Madison and Wilson said over and over,
was to secure justice through democracy.
They envisioned a form of government
that would not empower self-interested individuals
or enable majorities to form around particular interests,
but would instead provide the cultural resources
as well as the institutional framework
necessary to enable citizens of the new nation
to defend democracy against its dangers.
Representative democracy would provide the best means
to the end that Rousseau and Wilson
called the general will,
and that John Adams and Madison more often called
the common interest or the public good.
I've noted that de Tocqueville's analysis
of American democracy is important to my argument.
De Tocqueville owed deep debts
to his New England informants
during his stay in Boston,
and his conception of American democracy
depended on those New Englanders' own ethic of reciprocity,
a sensibility that they correctly understood
to be descended from earlier Christian
and classical republican ideals
and that they explained to Tocqueville
lay beneath the institution of the New England town meeting.
That sensibility was shared by Abolitionists,
by champions of women's rights,
such as Frederick Douglass,
Harriet Beecher Stowe, Margaret Fuller.
The sensibility of those antebellum reformers
with its emphasis on the ethic of reciprocity
reached a crescendo in the presidency of Abraham Lincoln.
Lincoln understood better than most of his contemporaries
the underlying premises of democracy,
and his words are just as powerful in 2017
as they were during his lifetime.
In one of his first public speeches
before the Young Men's Lyceum
in Springfield, Illinois, in 1838,
Lincoln condemned the brutal murder
of an innocent black man by a pro-slavery mob.
He warned that such lawlessness
threatened what Lincoln called
America's as yet undecided experiment,
testing the capability of a people to govern themselves.
Initially, Americans' shared animosity against Britain
had enabled Americans to project their hatreds outward.
But now, what Lincoln called
the basest principles of our nature
had returned in the crusade to preserve,
and even expand, slavery.
The passions being whipped up
on both sides of that struggle now endangered the nation.
Lincoln's own ideas about race
evolved painfully slowly over the rest of his life
until he reached a conviction
concerning the evil of slavery
that Frederick Douglass described
as zealous, radical,
and determined.
No matter how determined Lincoln became to end slavery,
he always tried to balance his own ideas
with his understanding
of the convictions of white Southerners.
In his first inaugural
he pleaded with the South not to secede
but instead to continue to debate slavery.
He concluded with the familiar appeal
to what he called the better angels of our nature,
the commitment to reciprocity,
the commitment violated by slavery,
that he thought all Americans could come to share
across the color line.
Even in the greatest of his speeches
at Gettysburg, and then in his second inaugural
when the outcome of the war had finally become clear,
Lincoln refused the gloating triumphalism
of most Northerners.
Instead, he pledged to bind up the nation's wounds,
to achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace
by acting with malice toward none and charity toward all.
For Lincoln, finishing the work of the war
did not mean continued violence,
vengeance, or retribution,
but the slow, steady work of rebuilding the nation
on a broader foundation of justice,
a foundation that would now include those so long excluded.
In the disheartening retreat
from democracy after the Civil War,
white Americans in the North as well as the South
revealed the depth of their racism.
They also revealed
that their commitment to the ethic of reciprocity
that was prized by the Whigs,
by de Tocqueville, and by Lincoln
was rooted in soil far too rocky to survive.
The wounds that opened
during the United States Civil War have not healed.
The divide between
the Confederacy and the Union
remains the principal cultural divide
in the United States today,
the divide that continues to shape our political discourse
and that threatens the ethic of reciprocity
in American democracy.
If you trace the lines
of the most vociferous criticism
of the 21st-century Democratic Party in general,
and of former President Barack Obama in particular,
those lines lead back to the Confederacy.
The Civil War had tragic and lasting consequences
for American democracy.
In its aftermath
the suffrage and civil liberties expanded in the North
and contracted in the South.
Slavery was abolished,
but forms of racial segregation
were reconfigured and reinvigorated
until the Civil Rights Movement at last
forced the nation to dismantle the regime of Jim Crow.
The American Civil War poisoned
the ethic of reciprocity on which democracy depends.
It sanctified the liberty of some individuals,
notably white men,
at the expense of others.
Like all civil wars,
it left a legacy of hatred and distrust
that has made further progress toward democracy
less likely rather than more likely
even today, a century and a half later.
Democracy begins in bloodshed
and it comes to life only through conflict.
In the Atlantic world from the 16th
through the end of the 19th century at least,
when that conflict has taken the shape of civil war,
it has meant if not the end,
then at least the indefinite suspension,
of the trust
on which democracy must rest.
Montaigne was right to emphasize
the importance of restraint and humility
as well as autonomy and reciprocity.
In the absence of those qualities,
he believed that individuals would prize freedom
only to dominate others
and democracy would be impossible.
In such circumstances
only absolute authority could ensure peace.
When we look at the history of democracy
in Europe and America,
it is apparent that the struggles to achieve self-government
have often generated conflicts
that have weakened the cultural conditions
necessary for democracy to survive.
In America our current culture of hyper-partisanship
tends to reinforce the destructive tendencies
toward self-righteousness,
dogmatism, and intolerance,
and to threaten the sensibilities
on which democracy depends.
To conclude with the title of my book's final chapter,
that dynamic has been the tragic irony of democracy.
(audience applauds)
(soft music)
- [Announcer] For more on this program
and other Carnegie Ethics Studio productions,
visit carnegiecouncil.org.
There you can find video highlights,
transcripts,
audio recordings,
and other multimedia resources on global ethics.
This program is made possible
by the Carnegie Ethics Studio
and viewers like you.
-------------------------------------------
Wrong Head Crying with Mega Gummy bear Crying songs for kids Finger Family rhymes - Duration: 2:14.
Wrong Head Crying with Mega Gummy bear Crying songs for kids Finger Family rhymes
-------------------------------------------
Learn Colors with Play Doh Animal Rabbit Mold Fun,Creative For kids|How to Make Playdough Rabbit DIY - Duration: 3:27.
Learn Colors with Play Doh Animal Rabbit Mold Fun,Creative For kids|How to Make Playdough Rabbit DIY
-------------------------------------------
Rabbi Rhonda Shapiro Rieser — Smith College School for Social Work Spiritual Adviser - Duration: 4:13.
I'm Rabbi Rhonda Shapiro Reiser and I'm the spiritual consultant for the School
for Social Work, so I tend to spirits. I'm trained in interfaith spiritual
direction. I got my doctorate from a Catholic school that had a Protestant
president, and I had a Jewish dissertation adviser in a program that
offers a doctorate in Muslim studies, so I'm pretty adept at dealing with different
spiritual backgrounds. I also trained for two years as a mindfulness leader, so I
deal in spirituality not necessarily religion. Students, depending on the year,
kind of have different questions. Every student is individual, but if I were to give
an absolute generalization, first-year students need strength of spirit to see
if they can actually get through the summer. That's their main question.
Second-year students are not sure that this is their calling.
They have gone to their internship and they are filled with self-doubt even though
most of them are filled with the desire to continue to work. Third-year students
often wonder whether what they're doing is going to matter, and that's a big one
for them. So, those aren't the only questions that we explore, but those are
the questions for each group that come up most frequently. And then there are
issues of life and death, suffering, all of these are questions when you're doing
the work that come up. So I deal with those. Those are in individual counseling.
I do pastoral counseling, I don't do therapeutic counseling. I am a therapist
so I know the difference between the two. I am very willing to refer if somebody
has a psychological need, but a lot of the students just want someone to talk to.
I don't take notes, it's just you and me having a chat, and they can call me
anytime and I'll make arrangements to see them.
I do what I call holy fool programs, so my
big one is make-your-own-sundae day, and that is where we get ice cream and we're
outside of Scales on the patio, and staff and the deans serve the students ice
cream, and you can get whatever you want. There are no calories that day.
So that's one. The other one that I do is called bubble day, and I give students
little packages of bubbles, little jars of bubbles, so that they can blow
bubbles in class. I don't know how the professors feel about that,
but I feel that among bubbles are very spiritual items and are necessary
sometimes in the classroom, so we have bubble day.
And my big one is instant mastery, 3-minute mastery, which is very hard to
do in the school for social work. So I will bring half a dozen ukuleles and I will stand
outside the classroom building and as people come out I will draft people and
give them the ukulele and all you need is one chord that you can play with one
finger, and we do several rounds of Row, Row, Row Your Boat and that seems to make
everybody smile. Students will notice me at least once a week I'm at
Scales for either lunch or dinner, so I will just sit down to a table and see how
students are doing. I don't have an office but I do have an email address:
rshapiroreiser@smith.edu
There's going to be issues that come up
that are not just issues of the psyche they're also issues of the soul. And that
is what I am here for.
And I love working with students, so I'm very excited to start the summer.
-------------------------------------------
Ремень для Коннера/Belt for Conner - Duration: 31:31.
For more infomation >> Ремень для Коннера/Belt for Conner - Duration: 31:31. -------------------------------------------
Deaf Boys for Hoy - Duration: 9:01.
Hey, you get over there!
We are on a new team.
This is our first game!
Yeah!
We are Deaf and the players over there are hearing. Wow, it is a challenge to communicate with them.
It is no big deal. We just teach them sign language and they can learn as time goes by.
Yeah, true, true.
Yeah, I agree.
Absolutely!
I'm bored, no play.
Same here.
Why didn't three of us play baseball game?
I don't know.
Hey, can ask the coach.
We haven't played.
Well...
To be honest with you,
It is difficult for you to play because you can't hear.
Wait a minute, we don't need ears to play baseball!
We have sharp eyes that we can catch everything.
Deaf people are more skilled than hearing people.
Really?
Let me think about it.
Maybe next game you can play. Ok?
Just watch and learn from it. Alright?
Ok, fine.
I have an idea!
We can look at the computer and find a skilled Deaf baseball player.
That, that is who the most skillful Deaf player, it is William "Dummy" Hoy! Oh!
After running to first base, he dared to go ahead and stole second base then stole third base again!
Finally, he ran to home base helping the team to earn points! He helped the team to win!
Yeah! Yeah!
Good idea to point out.
Why don't we print and show to the coach that there was an outstanding Deaf baseball player.
Yeah, good idea!
We need to practice.
Yeah, let's go!
We must practice hard like Dummy Hoy!
Absolutely!
Remember, we viewed a movie how long time ago that Dummy Hoy practiced by using a wall with a
square on it that he practiced by throwing a ball to the target.
Now, we get to practice with this that we throw here.
Hey, so that is where the ball goes to this target.
Yes, indeed! Let's throw!
I would like to show you this.
His name is William "Dummy" Hoy. He has a reputation as an outstanding Deaf baseball player.
So there is a such thing that a Deaf baseball player existed!
Also, we had practiced.
We really want to play game.
Three of you, come here. You guys go!
These three Deaf boys faced a challenge with the hearing players. What was the challenge?
After the coach told the boy that they couldn't play baseball, what did they say to the coach?
True or False? Dummy Hoy stole 596 bases.
True or False?
How did the Deaf baseball players convince the coach to let them play baseball?
What does discrimination mean?
How did the coach discriminate the deaf players?
The challenge was communication.
One of the boys said that we don't need ears to play baseball.
We have sharp eyes that we can easily detect more than hearing people.
How did the boys convince the coach?
They printed the information to show the coach a skilled deaf baseball player named Dummy Hoy.
They had a heated discussion and finally, it was resolved.
It is true that Dummy Hoy stole 596 bases.
Discrimination means denying opportunities just because of their deafness, disability like wheelchair users, blind people, etc.
Also, skin color (race), and religion.
How the boys were discriminated? They were denied the opportunity to play just because they couldn't hear.
-------------------------------------------
Play Doh Lollipops Learning Colors for Childrens|How To Make Giant Play Doh Lollipops|PlayDoh Guides - Duration: 1:56.
Play Doh Lollipops Learning Colors for Childrens|How To Make Giant Play Doh Lollipops|PlayDoh Guides
-------------------------------------------
Obamas Purchase DC Rental House for $8.1M - Duration: 0:54.
For more infomation >> Obamas Purchase DC Rental House for $8.1M - Duration: 0:54. -------------------------------------------
Jefferson Parish Officials Prepare For Hurricane Season - Duration: 1:48.
HURRICANE
SEASON.
OUR REPORT WAS AT THE PARISH
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER
WHERE OFFICIALS TALKED ABOUT
THEIR PLANS.
REPORTER: PARISH PRESIDENT SAYS
JEFFERSON PARISH IS PREPARED
MORE NOW THAN EVER FOR HURRICANE
SEASON.
TODAY WE GOT A CHANCE TO SEE AND
HEAR WHY IT IS HE FEELS THAT
WAY.
>> OUR DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS ONE OF
THE VERY BEST AROUND.
AND WE HAVE STORM-PROOFED ALL OF
OUR MAJOR PUMP STATIONS TO WITH
STAND CATEGORY THREE HURRICANES.
REPORTER: JEFFERSON PARISH
LEADERS AND PARTNERS ALL SPOKE
ON IMPROVEMENTS MADE TO THE
PARISH'S EMERGENCY PLAN AS WE
EMBARK UPON HURRICANE SEASON,
2017.
THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IS
EXPECTING AN ABOVE NORMAL
SEASON.
ALL SYSTEMS FROM PREVIOUS YEARS
ARE IN PLACE TO MONITOR STORMS
AND THIS YEAR SOME NEW THINGS
WILL BE ENACTED TO BETTER WARN
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC.
>> THE TWO MOST EXCITING ARE THE
STORM SURGE WATCH AND WARNING.
THEY WILL NOW BE ACCOMPANIED BY
TEXT DESCRIPTIONS AND THEY'LL
ALSO BE, IN THE CASE OF THE
STORM SURGE WARNING, TONE
ALERTED ON NOAA WEATHER RADIO
AND ALSO THROUGH THE WIRELESS
EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM.
REPORTER: WHEN IT COMES TO FLOOD
PROTECTION, SEALA AND EAST
JEFFERSON LEVEE DISTRICTS SAY
LEVEES, FLOOD GATES AND FLOOD
WALLS ON THE PARISH'S EAST AND
WEST BANKS HAVE ALL BEEN
INSPECTED AND ARE ALL READY FOR
THE SEASON.
>> WE'RE CONFIDENT IN OUR SYSTEM
BUT WE URGE EVERYBODY TO TAKE
THEIR OWN PRECAUTIONS IN
PREPARATION FOR THE STORM SEASON
AND TO LISTEN TO EVERYTHING THAT
THEIR LOCAL OFFICIALS HAVE TO
SAY.
REPORTER: THEY ENCOURAGE
JEFFERSON PARISH RESIDENTS TO
VISIT THE WEBSITE FOR EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS INFORMATION AND TO
TAKE TIME TO SIGN UP NOW FOR THE
EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM CALLED
J.P. ALERT.
YOU CAN FIND LINK TOS TO BOTH ON
-------------------------------------------
Amanda Holden strips to lingerie for red hot shoot with Alesha Dixon - Duration: 2:47.
Amanda Holden strips to lingerie for red hot shoot with Alesha Dixon
The Britains Got Talent beauties have teamed up for a cover shoot of sizzling proportions for Fabulous magazine. Posing against a plain white backdrop, the hotties stripped down to skimpy outfits and draped themselves over each other.
Amanda wore a black thong and strapless bra, with a see-through one-piece draped over the top.
She stood side on with a hand on her hip, rocking a scarlet manicure and diamond jewellery. Her golden tresses tumbled around her shoulders in loose curls and she sported an enviable bronzed glow.
In the makeup stakes, the 46-year-old teamed a nude pout with arched eyebrows, fake lashes and a sweep of highlighter across her cheekbones. Meanwhile, Alesha opted for a tiny crop top and an embellished miniskirt that showed off her endless pins.
She rocked statement earrings and wore her raven tresses slicked back behind her ears. Some killer contouring to accentuate her cheekbones topped off the look, alongside a lick of body oil.
Both babes looked every bit the lean, mean, pouting machines as they smouldered into the camera.
In the accompanying interview they discussed stripping off, simmering tensions and Simon Cowell – which seems timely considering todays backlash. Ofcom received a whopping 216 complaints for Amandas latest daring ensemble, which was 90% cleavage.
Meanwhile, fans on social media blasted the yummy mummy, branding the look inappropriate for a family show.
-------------------------------------------
Dozens gather at prayer vigil for 2 killed near Kinston housing complex - Duration: 0:55.
THIS MORNING
DOZENS OF PEOPLE
GATHERED TO
REMEMBER TWO MEN...
SHOT AND KILLED THIS
WEEK.
THE MURDERS
HAPPENED OUTSIDE THE
"MITCHELL WOOTEN"
APARTMENT COMPLEX ON
WEDNESDAY.
POLICE SAY A 15-
YEAR-OLD WAS
ARRESTED AND CHARGED
IN THE CASE.
ONE OF THE VICTIMS'
MOTHERS SAYS THE
VIOLENCE NEEDS TO
STOP.
SHE HOPES THE
COMMUNITY REMEMBERS
HER SON IN A POSITIVE
WAY.
"he wanted to go into the
military...
He was to meet with a
recruiter on monday, he
didn't want to go to a four
year college because he
didn't want his children to
have to rely on government
assistance.
he wanted to provide...
And he wanted to give them
the chance that he had.
KINSTON POLICE SAY
THEY'RE WORKING ON
SEVERAL INITIATIVES TO
PREVENT RETALIATION
AND LOWER THE CITY'S
CRIME RATE.
THIS MEANS PAIRING
UP WITH THE "LENOIR
COUNTY SHERIFF'S
OFFICE," THE "S-B-I," "A-
L-E" AND OTHER
ORGANIZATIONS.
A MAN CHARGED WITH
KILLING HIS FOUR-
-------------------------------------------
It's a Great Day for Pam and Her New CR-V Touring! - Duration: 0:37.
Hi, I'm Pam Smith
I just bought a brand new Honda CR-V Touring
and I love it!
It's got wonderful features,
much better than what my Volkswagen had.
So, I'm excited to start driving around in it.
The sales people have been absolutely marvellous.
I love to shop locally, we just live around the corner.
So we can walk over here for anything that
we need and they guarantee that they will
keep us happy no matter what
and they give us the best deal.
My husband went to every dealership in the
Lower Mainland to see if he could get a better deal
Couldn't get a better deal than what we got
here, so we're happy campers.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét