Waching daily Apr 6 2017

ALAMTOLOGI has its own philosophy that is different from any conventional philosophy.

Historically,

philosophers defined philosophy in a various definition that involves their ethnic, culture and backgrounds.

However, I would like to emphasise that

the definition of philosophy by philosophers and conventionalists has yet came into something clear.

There is a group of people stating that Pythagoras was the first person to have used the term philosophy.

But, there are also other group of people claiming that Socrates was somehow the first person

to introduce and used philosophy.

Thus,

Why is philosophy so important?

In any knowledge process,

philosophy is the intial took for the real understanding of what needed to be done.

If I take the statement from conventional,

I have this piece

and I take some information from here and I have this book,

I also take some information from this XYZ formula book.

Just like I have mentioned earlier,

I will explain each topic in this book

but I have no capacity to explain them all in detail. I explain only part of it.

However, everything is explained in detailed in this book.

I advice you to get it. You can get it directly from us.

If you would like to buy,

you can also email it to us.

We will be putting the email address at the end of this video.

Coming back to the philosophy concept,

Phytagoras had a unique subject in his philosophical concept,

so was Socrates.

I take from the statement

made among historians,

Phytagros was believed to be a Greek descendent.

Greek was existed in year around 500; 500 or 600 BC.

And Phytagoras was believed to be the founder

of the word philosophy and was also the first person to have used the word.

What does it mean?

He said Al Bahsu or in other word it is about knowledge.

It is about wisdom and it is also about priority.

This is the concept in his statement.

And,

in the word philosophy itself is very ambiguous.

The word is a combination of words of different meaning.

The world Philosophy for instance. Philo signifies love, the affection

while sophy signifies wisdom.

This is

the beginning of philosophy by Phytagoras.

He claimed to be a philosopher

or a lover of wisdom.

Person who loves wisdom.

This is from

the source that I have gained,

these are the information that I have received about Phytagoras's philosophy concept.

And then, there is another group of people

claiming that it was not Phytagoras the first person to have discovered philosophy.

However, it was Socrates instead.

With this set,

the subject is put at different position.

In philosophy concept, this group of people is known as sufirism.

Sufirism experts are also known to be one group of philosophers

Thus, Socrates isolate himself from that situation.

So,

I am sure it is quite a lot of an explanation that I have already made regarding this topic.

However this is only part of the discussion and explanation made in the book.

We would only like to give a few examples on the approach to understand the difference.

From philosophy, only then the procedures or process of knowledge development could be gained.

This is how it differs from ALAMTOLOGI.

ALAMTOLOGI,

does not verify philosophy as

something

variable.

But it must to be clear.

This is because, inaccuracy of philosophy

may lead to a different meaning of implementation process for what supposed to be achieved.

This is a very good topic of discussion

and I would like to explain how ALAMTOLOGI philosophy

is different from Socrates philosophy.

From the beginning of the video, we are explained by the difference

that conventional great scholars

and thinkers take on the true definition of philosophy compared to ALAMTOLOGI.

I would like to highlight that thinkers will

emphasise the understanding of philosophy before developing any theories, formulas and etc.

In

ALAMTOLOGI context,

like I mentioned earlier

we have to acknowledge philosophy, what philosophy exactly is.

Conventionally,

it is understood as love,

it is understood as wisdom.

It is something that can be varied by multiple meaning.

However, based on ALAMTOLOGI, philosophy is an identity.

Philosophy is actually an identity.

It means,

It has to have an identity at the beginning of the process.

Hospitable identity, temper identity and so on.

They are the elements that exist after the process of recognising that identity does takes place.

In other word,

we have to understand the identity before implementing any concept in it.

Thus, that is how ALAMTOLOGI view and understand what philosophy is.

Identity of element,

identity of any creatures is like what I have explained earlier.

It is about Z and X.

Y is the creator of both.

Thus,

ALAMTOLOGI verifies

that philosophy has its own identity that is positioned as the base system

for any implementation process

of the X.

If I could talk about this all over again.

It all refers back to the basic philosophy concepts explained in this book,

all of the individuals like Socrates,

Phytagoras, Ibn Sina, and Al Farabi have their own specific philosophy.

Those concepts or philosophies become the base system for the following developments and understandings.

One of the most interesting topics in this book is about function of humans. In this book explains,

where does human come from and where will human end up?

This is one of the questions that he tried to explain using the philosophy introduced.

What is the purpose of human and universe creation.

And,

these are questions that had actually made past scholars to think and analyse.

In this concept,

ALAMTOLOGI viewed them as

an identity.

Putting identity

for every subject allows us to locate its position

based on the capacity it has.

Thus, ALAMTOLOGI defined philosophy is

a very simple word,

identity.

However, it has such a big role

Identity is the main key or subject needed to be recognised before creating or

inventing any developmental process in any fields. It could be in technology or even in science development.

In identity there is an inner unit of active mechanism called character.

Character itself has its own specific character.

Thus, philosophy is an identity that has characternin it.

From such identity discipline

we will acknowledge that everything has its identity.

This has X identity,

this has Z identity.

This from here we will know it is not valid to take identity of Y when you are actually an identity of X.

It can never happen.

This is because we have to always look at the base system that is acknowledging its identity.

That is the role of philosophy in ALAMTOLOGI.

Just like I have mentioned earlier,

identity is

the philosophy.

Identity of within the region Z.

Thus, the role for every X in Z

is different.

For example,

every human has the identity of human

but their role is different.

He is a teacher,

another X is a pilot.

There is another X as a doctor

or maybe a fisherman or a farmer.

He has a character

that is based on the role that could be done based on his capacity.

Thus,

it is very clear

this sets that every X

exists in the Z region

has its own role

with their own identity.

This is not a mere statement on the basis of imagination.

But it is a process of understanding

the real value that X has.

With this acknowledgement, we will then locate X to where it belong.

For example, we take a person and we train him.

In the training process, we will have the parameter or a method to explain his character.

From here, we will know that he is capable for the implementation process

Because value means the person has the capacity value. We will get to this topic later.

We could take a farmer as an example. His value is positioned as a farmer.

From here we locate the system, if another person is suitable to become a fisherman.

He will then go fishing

and he will come back as a fisherman

but not as a farmer.

What does this mean? If he is a fisherman, he will come back by bringing fish.

He does his role according to the capacity he owns and that gives the adding value or benefits for others.

Same goes to the farmer.

He cannot go to the sea. He could go,

but that is not

his identity and the capacity that he has is not for that.

He will then go to

the place where he could plant

or maybe to do something related to plants that is suitable with his capacity.

He will then bring the outcome of his role for the society.

In this context, he will bring the product of agriculture for the benefit of others.

Thus, this is the basic concept of philosophy understood by ALAMTOLOGI.

We are not talking about wisdom, nor that we are talking about love.

This will create the position of X ambiguous.

What do we want to really grasp as a person from the word wisdom?

And what do we really want to grasp from the word love?

However, there is one thing that is very clear. Every X has something called necessity in life.

Surviving allows philosophy to highlight its importance directly

to the X and with that Z region exists.

Therefore, based on ALAMTOLOGI philosophy will only happen within the Z region.

For more infomation >> What is PHILOSOPHY - XYZ? - Duration: 14:26.

-------------------------------------------

The Last Dialogue Part 6 - Duration: 19:30.

All praise is due to God, to whom belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is

in the earth, and to Him belongs all praise in the Hereafter.

And He is the Wise, the All Aware.

He knows what penetrates into the earth and what emerges from it and what descends from

the heaven and what ascends therein.

And He is the Merciful, the Forgiving.

But those who disbelieve say, "The Hour will not come to us."

Say, "Yes, by my Lord, it will surely come to you.

God is the Knower of the unseen."

Not absent from Him is an atom's weight within the heavens or within the earth or what is

smaller than that or greater, except that it is in a clear register -

That He may reward those who believe and do righteous deeds.

Those will have forgiveness and noble provision.

But those who strive against Our Signs seeking to cause failure - for them will be a painful

punishment of foul nature.

But those who disbelieve say, "Shall we direct you to a man- who will inform you- that when

you have disintegrated in complete disintegration, you will then be recreated in a new creation?

"Has he fabricated a lie against God, or is he insane?"

Rather those who disbelieve in the Hereafter are in the punishment and extreme error.

Then, do they not look at what is before them and what is behind them of the heaven and

earth?

If We should will, We could cause the earth to swallow them or could let fall upon them

fragments from the sky.

Indeed in that is a sign for every servant repentant.

And they say, "When is this promise due, if you are truthful?"

Say, "For you is the appointment of a Day when you will not remain thereafter an hour,

nor will you precede it."

And We did not send into a city any warner except that its wealthy people said, "Indeed

we, in that with which you were sent, are disbelievers."

And they said, "We are more in wealth and children, and we will not be punished."

Say, "Indeed, my Lord extends provision for whom He wills and restricts it, but most of

the people do not know."

O people I am telling you that trust on God and stop doing injustice, He will help you

from where you are not expecting.

But first understand the concept of Wrongdoing and injustice.

Injustice and wrongdoing is treating a thing in a way which it is not meant to be treated.

An act that inflicts undeserved hurt.

It applies to any act that involves unfairness to another or violation of one's rights.

Injustice can be with anything animate or inanimate.

I tell you how, consider you live in an apartment and in the center of your living room there

is a table.

Now if you only change its place and put it outside your apartment in the corridor it

will become an injustice not only to the table but also with the corridor and all residents

of that building.

So using a thing in a way which it is not supposed to use is injustice.

Now consider a knife it is meant to be used as an instrument to cut various stuff like

fruits vegetables but if you use it to injure someone then you are doing injustice not only

to that person but also with the knife.

Same is the matter with all your organs God has made your hands, foot, tongue and lips

to perform your day to day tasks and not to hurt someone.

Your sex organs are meant to be used for lawful interactions with spouses you lawfully possess

and not for illicit relationships.

Let me also respond here on the homosexuality issue about which many prominent minds among

you say that its not a sin but it is all natural and present everywhere in nature.

They say if there is any God than He has made it like this as this trait of homosexuality

is present in many animal species.

Almost 20% of monkeys are homosexual.

Now the logical reply is that there are number of other things which animals do but for you

as human beings are wrong like killing, stealing and making sex unlawfully with others wife

and daughters etc.

But for these things you never argued that because animals do this all so its all natural

and no sin in doing that.

O mankind I am telling you again that trust on God and stop doing injustice, He will help

you from where you were not expecting.

Your Lord has created everything in justice.

Full Praise is to God, who raised the heavens and laid the earth and put justice in them.

Just understand the concept of injustice and stop doing it on the smallest level.

specially take care of those dependent on you.

Treat women the same way as you expect them to treat you.

You are same species and equal in the eyes of your Lord.

In some scriptures it is said that men are superior but people totally misunderstood

that.

If my Lord wills I will surely clear that confusion for you.

Whoever has oppressed another person concerning his reputation or anything else, he should

beg him to forgive him before the Day of Resurrection when there will be no money to compensate

for wrong deeds, but if he has good deeds, those good deeds will be taken from him according

to his oppression which he has done, and if he has no good deeds, the sins of the oppressed

person will be loaded on him

He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous are both alike an abomination

to the Lord.

Your Lord has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the Lord require of you but

to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God.

O people all religious scriptures speak about not to associate partners with God.

These partners are not only idols as perceived by majority of people.

Idols are one among them.

A true revelation of God is always universal and valid for any age.

So it changes its sense with the changing time as now it has many more meanings in it.

As compared to a simple society, today's society is much more complex, and associating

partners with God means considering anyone else as a being giving you your provisions,

health, life, security and anything you can imagine.

Religion and scriptures came to you to give you liberty from many gods, idols or humans,

to break the chains, to give you liberty from superstition so that all your fears come to

an end.

So that you need not to go to different places, different doors for your problems, provisions

and for your needs.

Therefore all religious scriptures say that associating partners with God is much more

an evil than not believing in any god.

As not believing is not so dangerous as believing in wrong deity.

I give you an example, consider you arrive in a country or a city and you are unaware

of the ruler of that region and about its policies than chances are you can make a few

mistakes but soon you would become aware of the law and the ruler.

But in case you get trapped by some wrong people and if they manage to tell you a total

different version of rules, laws and policies, chances are you would make quite serious mistakes

or even some unlawful activity in that country which may end up to some serious crime some

severe punishment.

There are many social and moral issues in associating partners with God.

You go to different places to different doors for your problems, provisions and for your

needs.

It makes you superstitious and irrational.

It makes you like a beggar knocking every other door and asking everyone for their needs.

This is not the case with God the only One the All Mighty as He invites your common sense

to think that, is this universe a creation or not, does it has a beginning, and we now

know for sure that it had a beginning, it will surely end and will cease to exist.

He invites you to think about the creator that is He Himself.

He doesn't invites you to superstition but actually inviting your conscious, your mind

your logic to think rationally about him.

Most atheist and skeptics think that religious people are superstitious.

I tell you that they are right.

All this is actually because of accepting religions by birth and not by accepting it

through mind through logic or not even by heart.

They only say that we are believers but fact is that faith has not passed even from their

throat, its just on their lips and tongues.

So whoever is superstitious is actually not a believer but more chances are that he must

have associated partners with God.

Trust me check your inner self you will find the answer.

Now come to the Big Question "Is there a God".

In the words of one of the greatest minds "The problem involved is too vast for our

limited minds.

May I not reply with a parable?

The human mind, no matter how highly trained, cannot grasp the universe.

We are in the position of a little child, entering a huge library whose walls are covered

to the ceiling with books in many different tongues.

The child knows that someone must have written those books.

It does not know who or how.

It does not understand the languages in which they are written.

The child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books, a mysterious order, which it

does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects.

That, it seems to me, is the attitude of the human mind, even the greatest and most cultured,

towards God.

We see a universe marvelously arranged, obeying certain laws, but we understand the laws only

dimly.

Our limited minds cannot grasp the mysterious force that sways the constellations"

There is a long history of debate on the non existence and existence of God.

I am presenting you all this case in simplest words so that an average mind can also understand.

This prelude for understanding God and His kingdom is much lengthy and will come again

and again in between my coming programs.

A brief summary of arguments against the existence of God includes Empirical arguments such as

argument from inconsistent revelations which negates the existence of God because of contradictions

between different scriptures, within a single scripture, and between scriptures and known

facts.

The second argument is the problem of evil which negates the existence of a god who is

both omnipotent and omni benevolent by arguing that such a god should not permit the existence

of evil or suffering.

The third empirical argument is about the destiny of the nonbelievers, by which persons

who have never even heard or got a chance to read a particular revelation might be harshly

punished for not following its commands.Than comes the argument from poor design which

contests the idea that God created life on the basis that lifeforms, including humans,

seem to exhibit poor design as is the case of 99% of life extinctions on earth during

ice ages and the destruction and time taken to produce a planet like earth.The fifth empirical

argument is argument from non belief which negates the existence of an omnipotent God

who wants humans to believe in him by arguing that such a god could do a better job of converting

collecting and gathering believers.

Than comes the arguments that the burden of proof for the existence of God lies with the

theist rather than the atheist.

Russell's teapot and Occam's Razor based analogies are used to explain this argument.

Than there are many deductive arguments one of which is a counter-argument to the argument

from design which states that a complex or ordered structure must be designed.

This counter arguments states that if God is the creator of this universe He should

be more or equally complicated as the universe that it creates.

Therefore, He too must require a creator or designer which would require another designer

also uptil infinity.

Thus the argument for the existence of God is a logical fallacy with or without the use

of special pleading.

Than there is omnipotence paradox (Omnipotence mean all powerful) which states that If an

omnipotent being is able to perform any action, then it should be able to create a task that

it is unable to perform.

Hence, this being cannot perform all actions.

There are different versions of this like can God create a rock so big that He cannot

move it?

Or can God create a being more powerful than Himself?"

Or Can God create a prison so secure that he cannot escape from it?"

If yes for all of the above questions: than God's power is limited, because it cannot

lift the stone or escape from the prison or another being is more powerful than him.

If no: than again that being's power is limited, because it cannot create the stone.

the prison or a powerful being than Him.

All these above philosophical debates and arguments have their origin back in history

some 500 years before Christ- that is more than 2500 years in past.

You can clearly see how sharp were the minds of those people- those big brains of human

history.

And you who call yourselves believers- you look towards those people with hatred- because

you think them non believers- and as someone who will be the subject of God's wrath on

the Judgement Day.

While the fact is that those were the minds who laid foundation of human knowledge, Philosophy

and sciences.

If my Lord Wills I will continue this topic in next programs.

If some high scientific or philosophical term come in between my dialogue just bear with

with me.

If my Lord Wills you will soon understand it as you listen more and more of this dialogue.

For more infomation >> The Last Dialogue Part 6 - Duration: 19:30.

-------------------------------------------

Con Trai Tôi Đã Tử Vong Vì Loại Cây Cảnh Nhà Ai Cũng Chơi Này - Duration: 9:58.

For more infomation >> Con Trai Tôi Đã Tử Vong Vì Loại Cây Cảnh Nhà Ai Cũng Chơi Này - Duration: 9:58.

-------------------------------------------

Around the Corner with John McGivern | Program | #613 -- Wisconsin Rapids - Duration: 26:47.

For more infomation >> Around the Corner with John McGivern | Program | #613 -- Wisconsin Rapids - Duration: 26:47.

-------------------------------------------

2. What is PLC? － What is PLC?〈Your First PLC (6/19)〉 - Duration: 0:26.

In this chapter,

we will learn about the structure of the PLC

and basic knowledge for programming.

PLC stands for "Programmable Logic Controller".

To be more precise, a PLC is a device that can be easily programmed

to perform "Sequence Control" using relays and timers.