hey everyone I just wanted to get a
couple of things off my chest before
this video starts this is the first time
me doing YouTube which has only been a
month and a half that I hated doing a
video I hate that I have to do this
video so I want everyone to know that
and the only reason I did is because I
think it's very important video
regardless that I hated doing it now I'm
going to talk about some progressive in
this video and her not supporting
justice Democrats and telling other
people not to support them I think this
video is important because she has
swayed a lot of people into believing
what's what she says and this video is
not just for seeing progressive this
videos for anyone who thinks this way
I'm only using her because she has the
biggest voice in this dissent so I had a
had to now I know seen progress the
reason I hated doing the videos because
I know seen progressive shares my values
and I know she believes in pretty much
the same things I believe in and I used
to be a fan of hers until she did this
and unfortunately this video had to come
out and I had to I had to express my
feelings I do go in on her I don't swear
or anything or give her sweater or
anything like that but yes I give her a
piece of my mind in this video I also
want really quickly to say that the
difference between me and one same
progressive and you all you other people
who are doing this is is that I support
everything and anyone who says that
Kyle kolinsky and TYT anyone who's
involved in just Democrats are trying to
tell anyone to only do the justice
Democrats are lying and if you have a
video showing me that they're saying
that you send it to me and I'll give you
500 bucks that's how much I know that
you'll never find that video no one's
saying you have to do the Justice
Democrats I'm not telling you you have
to either all I'm saying is don't tell
other people what's good and what's
wrong as long as progressives get in
that's what that's the only thing that
should matter I also want to say that
and this is the last point ask yourself
this before you write a comment who
believes in this stuff before you write
a comment ask yourself this if you were
if you were the last votes to vote on a
Justice Democrat
who shares your values and you tell
yourself that you're not going to do
that you want to vote then as you look
in the mirror like same progressive
likes to tell people to look in the
mirror you look in the mirror and ask
yourself are you a real progressive
because if you're telling yourself that
no I want to vote for that just as
Democrat even though they share my
values then you're not a real
progressive and even though I don't
agree with the same progressive at all
in this I would still vote for any
candidate that she had that shared my
values and that's the difference
so before you write that comment ask
yourself that question because I asked
myself that question and I still would
support any candidate in any any party
it doesn't matter as long as they share
my values I would support that person
that's all I have to say I would say
enjoy enjoy the video but I really did
enjoy making this video but I do think
the message is important and even if I
and I hope I framed them at this video
well enough that even if it changes one
person's mind to at least support it
just as Democrats you don't have to be
all-in and but at least at least accept
them and and support them like you would
support anyone else who's progressive
then I've done my job thank you
hey everyone welcome to the progressive
social warriors where we speak truth to
power we speak truth the Republican and
Democratic Party but especially a
Democratic Party because that's why we
have Trump so we're going to get into
this really quick is that I want this
video to be any longer than it has to
well I'm going to discuss the same
progressive I know a lot of a lot of
people watch her and a lot of people
seem to agree with what she has to say
about the Justice Democrats I totally
disagree with her I think that she is
doing harm to the progressive movement I
think she's splitting progressives in a
way that is wrong and which I don't
agree with whatsoever if you agree with
the same progressive do me a favor and
watch this whole video before you try
and argue with me because if I notice
that you haven't watch this whole video
you're just commenting I'm not even
going to bother answering you back so
I'm going to get into this real quick I
looked at the platform that was put up
by secular talk and the Turks and it
just okay let's let's let's break it
down
Kyle Kaczynski and junk youger it's time
to face the facts the Democratic Party
is broken and the corporate
establishment wing of the party is
responsible okay in the first sentence
they're lost alright
no it's not the the establishment
corporate Democrats that that is why we
are where we are today we the American
people and the Democratic constituents
have been codependent and neighbours to
the corruption of the Democratic Party
we have failed to practice basic citizen
oversight we've watched as they again
and again and again and again and again
cross lines to dirt across and then we
always are rationalizing why we have to
stay with politicians who are betraying
our most core interests all right let's
look okay so let's start off by saying
that she has a point yes
people have been not paying attention
and voting for these politicians but
let's also be unfair that people are
just starting to wake up unfortunately
so
as a point but what does she want to
just Democrats to have the first thing
on their platform saying by the way it's
the vote it's you guys the voters fault
for why we have these politicians and
that's why that's why we have them
because it's your fault what what what
is she talking about man
okay yes she has a point people people
weren't too weren't awake enough to
realize what was happening but they are
now but just several kinds are going to
put in their platform it's the voters
fault it's your fault for putting these
people in to begin with Wow
so already starting off pissing me right
off with nonsense
to move on to the next so the strategy
is in 2018 hundreds of Justice Democrats
will you run a unified campaign to
replace every corporate back member of
Congress and rebuild the party from
scratch and they go on for their plan
they want a constitutional amendment to
take the to end the Washington
corruption corruption and bring about
election form you're not going to get a
constitutional amendment to to do that
you're not I'm looking at your plans and
I'm and there is a glaring omission a
glaring omission that puts your plan
dead in the water before it even
launches election fraud is is a reality
and we're met with radio silence as
Bernie Sanders refused to address the
fraud that cost us all the nominations
so if you're looking to that as a leader
you know you can talk about every great
policy and you can talk about everything
that we need to do to to an act but if
you're not going to address the core
issue of corruption and fraud yes that's
not the person who's going to lead you
out of this he is sheep dogging and he
dangerous at this point
okay so instead see this is how you do
things okay people because it matters
how you say things okay it does it
matters how you see things she could say
hey listen during the primary
I was with the Bernie Sanders campaign
and I've seen a lot of election fraud
and a lot of purging and and yes I'm
sure that happened and that there's been
proof and it's where she's right it's
proven that that there was purging from
the front from the voters and there was
shenanigans going on in the primaries
when it came to Bernie Sanders yes I
agree but instead of saying hey listen
just as Democrats I just want to give
you guys fair warning that you know this
is what I experienced so just so you
know going forward if you're going to
run these candidates even though I agree
with your policies figuring to run these
candidates make sure you look out for
this because I in my experience this
happened you know what I mean
not on Iran all forget about it it's not
going to work because of election fraud
and you guys didn't mentioned the
election fraud so therefore it's not
going to work and don't bother with it
what that's progressive that someone's
trying to help but that someone who's
not trying to help there's a difference
of how you say things guys come on man
that's common sense
she talks about common sense that's
common sense that's how you do something
you want to have your concerns come out
and and some of her concerns are
legitimate but you do it in a in a
reasonable way you do it like I just
said hey listen you know this happened
look out for it not don't do it don't
bother with it it's not going to work
what a joke that's that's so wrong you
have no idea how upset I am that someone
with a decent following I mean she's not
one of the biggest youtubers but you
know she had a decent following would
come on and do this it makes me think
she has alternative goals and
alternative reasoning for why she did it
anyway let's keep going we're going to
have a People's Movement is something
where people all get together and we
talk and we talk about creating an
alternative strategy this is kind of
patriarchal what I'm seeing with the
Turks here and Jack and Kyle they make
the plan simply Bernie Sanders just like
Bernie Sanders this is what we're going
to do this is how we're going to do it
this is the way and and did we have a
conversation so this is what
I mean when the hell did jancker Kyle or
Bernie say this is the way it is and you
got to do it this way they never said
that you go and check what Kyle actually
said because Kyle talks about this more
in depth okay and I always have a link
about the Justice Democrats on him
explaining it okay but I'm sure all of
you already know he says I support her
just like me that's the difference
between what she's trying to do and what
I'm trying to do and what Kyle's trying
to do I don't care how progressives get
in I just want them to get in you want
to do it a different way I support you I
don't care how you do it but I'm not
going to go around saying don't do it
that way that's the wrong way and it's
never going to work that way and so
don't bother with it
come on no one has to check in with you
that B no one has to check in with you
we should be supporting all of every
single way we can get progressives in
not it's my way or the highway this is
what I mean man just one one way
thinking no let's let's have a variety
of ideas no one's saying that you have
to fall I'm not saying you have to
follow just add support adjust American
sir I'm not saying you have to follow it
and you make sure you know you want to
do a third party or you want to whatever
you want to do I don't care what you do
I support you anyways this can't work
because the election infrastructure
isn't in place to vote these these
politicians in they cheat they cheat at
every level they cheat at the local the
state and the national level so you can
talk about starting so what's her logic
it's impossible to do anything why even
try they cheat but they're not going to
let a third party you're going to cheat
a third party - they're going to cheat
in the primaries they're going to cheat
period because they cheat on every level
but then she I didn't find it the
interview not the interview her talking
about it where she talks about Xiaomi
suwanee I can't sorry I missed but
churring her name but how she how she's
going to have around her Shores she's
trying to have her on her show but she's
an elected official at the City Council
level in Seattle but why didn't they
stop her from getting voted in it's all
rigged they everything's rigged it's
impossible so how did she get in also
it's not impossible it's just impossible
because they want to do it a different
way than you want to do it yeah it's
hard to do yeah I'm sure there is
shenanigans and I'm sure there is people
behind the scenes who are trying not to
let these progressions get into office
but it can be done because obviously the
way from Seattle got into office and she
got it and she got a $15 minimum wage
push through in Seattle I'm sure the
Democrats didn't want that and people
talk to people well people will come -
well right on me don't don't tell us
about a Democratic Party I rarely gets a
Democratic Party I hate the Democratic
Party I wish Bernie Sanders went to a
third party okay I just don't think
Bernie Sanders ever going to do that and
I think just the Democrats is the
fastest way of going forward to get
progressives in that's it okay
I support all third parties I support
anything anything to get progressives in
I support I would never bash anyone's
way of what they're doing not to say no
you can't do it that way you didn't have
a conversation with me or Ives
what why did you have to have a
conversation those people decided that
this is the best way that date that
we're moving forward you think it's a
different way great go ahead do it but
to bash other people for trying
different methods that's a joke man
groups that were down there who are all
getting together to meet up and they do
not want to move through the Democratic
establishment and yet they're talking
about doing direct actions they're
consulting which hedges which is
probably one of the most brilliant
people a West is is on the side the
people of standing rock black lives
matter alternative party leaders they
all got together and they all put down
their individual agendas to talk about
what we all do in this cat a and this is
what I mean great do all that but
because Kyle and and TYT didn't go to
that meeting they're dismissed from
anything because they went on to the
inside to go on there I want to do
something different so fuck them people
stop thinking one way there isn't we're
not it's not teams anymore it's not
third party teams versus just as
Democrats it were all
on the same friggin team who cares how
things get who cares how we put these
people in as long as we put them in so
you're telling me that the same
progressive is going to see a justice
Democrat who she believes in all the
policies and she's gonna and and it's
her vote her vote is going to be the
vote that put that just a Democrat
person in who's going to believe in the
same policies as her or any of you who
believe this
and you're not going to vote for them
because of they didn't address election
fraud or they didn't or they didn't go
they didn't go the way that you wanted
them to go then you're not a real
progressive take that out of your head
right now you are not a real progressive
because I would vote for anyone I don't
care how what party they're from I don't
care if I believe in them I'm voting for
them
clean and simple I'm not here to
disregard or bash anyone's way of how
they want to move forward that's what
she's doing and that's 100 percent wrong
I'm gonna answer one question that
people were asking me people were like
well who who who did was a general
election stolen for in 2016 you know it
was it stolen for Trump was it stolen
for Clinton you know or was it tried to
be rigged for Clinton and Trump overcame
the margin of cheating I will say this
to you there is a huge debate within the
election integrity activist community
with people split on how the cheat went
down because there was a cheating and
there was cheating both sides I fall on
the on the side of Trump overcame the
margin of cheating because the
establishment Republicans and the
neoconservatives and the bush
administration officials associated with
election fraud we're actually with
Hillary Clinton and not Donald Trump but
you know with the way that the power
mechanisms play behind the scenes you
never know how these things go down so
the real thing is it's impossible to
know so it's impossible to know now but
I thought she knew but the election
fraud she was an expert on election
fraud but Donald Trump overcame that
election fraud so it's possible not to
over overcome the election fraud because
there's because it
right a third party which I'm sure
that's what she's trying to do I'm not I
don't know what she's trying to examine
watch her anymore because after this I
was done
anyone who who's trying to split people
I'm done and I'm going to tell you
something I did not the video the video
itself is ok but I did something called
Bernie Sanders versus Tulsi and someone
in the Facebook group and tells you
group called me on it and said why are
you doing that why is your title and
your thumbnail like that and I say you
know what that person's right I
shouldn't it did that that's stupid of
me of doing it I went right away and I
and I erased the title and I erased the
thumbnail made a new title and thumbnail
the content was fine I was basically
saying how tall she and Bernie how I
love them both and just giving the cons
and pros on both of them which is fine
and asking people who they like better
or if they like them together if they're
ok with both of them so the content
itself is fine but yes the thumbnail and
the title was absolutely wrong and the
person called me out and I agree with
them and I said yes I shouldn't did that
I'm starting with this YouTube and you
know sometimes you do things wrong but
I'm I was man enough to say you know
what yes I shouldn't did that I was
wrong you think same progresses going to
do that if she watches this video if
he's gonna say you know what that guy's
right man I may not agree with the way
the just Democrats are moving forward
but you know what who cares as long as a
progressive gets in and they believe in
the same policies that I that I do who
you know as long as we get as many
progressives in as possible which is
what you should be doing not bashing
people you can warn people absolutely
she could say all this stuff that she's
saying she could say it but do it in a
in a positive way in a way of just hey
this is our concern
you know just watch out for this not
don't do what it's not going to work hmm
I also think it's a highly important
because we know that the Democratic
Party establishment in their corruption
and in their manipulations have their
hands in everywhere
so when I see any organization begin to
form that is especially if it's act
asking for very large pools of you know
to see money I think it's imperative
that everybody looked to make sure that
there are no conflict is interest with
the establishment
Democrats now I've seen these ties with
the Justice Democrats and I'm not going
to go into that if you want a much
longer explanation you can look at the
video description below and see those
videos but I will I want to note one
thing that I thought was fascinating
secular talk Kyle's because Linsky is
one of the cofounders of the strategy of
the Justice Democrats and recently he
did a video talking about how
establishment Clinton ight Democrat
Howard Dean was the very first one to
mention the group and you know mention
it on the mainstream media he didn't say
it say the name of group directly but he
was alluding to it directly talking
about what the group had done how many
members have gotten strategy they were
talking he was talking about the Justice
Democrats and I thought it was
fascinating that the very first person
to talk about the Justice Democrats and
the mainstream media was an
establishment Democrat who one of who
their um co-founder Zack actually who
was a co-founder also of the Justice to
Democrat was a direct advisor to Howard
Dean but when I say that an
establishment Democrat is mentioning
this and kind of you know talking about
it in glowing terms it's a red flag okay
so now she's trying to make it seem like
justice Democrats are corrupt and
they're playing this mind Jedi trick
with you with everyone and they just
want you to come to the Democratic Party
and they're really establishment and
look see there was Howard Dean and
Howard Dean you know you don't like
Howard Dean and this right here this is
now the other stuff she was talking
about I yes absolutely she's fine and
doing that but what she what she just
did right now is horrible okay and this
is she's just horrible on what she's
doing okay so now we're going to see if
Howard Dean was talking about glowing
terms because she was talking about
going terms about the Justice Democrats
right that's what she said okay let's
see website that was just put up and
maybe like 250,000 people who agreed it
swing left please me and they got a
thousand people who agree to run for
office now I know this is unorganized
and disorganized but it's so how so now
this is unorganized and disorganized
trying to belittle that justice
Democrats because that's what he's doing
there okay he's making it seem like
their honor
organized and disorganized but I thought
it was glowing terms that's glowing
terms see what I mean did you see what I
mean that's not glowing terms you could
watch the whole interview I just took a
little snippet of it but then she was
not that much longer he never talked
about them in glowing terms okay
he just she just pretty much punked off
the group by saying they're unorganized
and disorganized or Dean for those of
you who don't know he was the Bernie
Sanders of the 2004 election now feels
gross even putting him in the same
sentence with Bernie Sanders because
soon thereafter when he lost I think he
briefly was the front-runner but he lost
in the primary he probably sold out
another thing that you need so not so
the night is just saw Kyle talking shit
about Howard Dean but she's doing it
because she's trying to trick you
even though Kyle and and even a lot of
members of TYT and even Jiang himself
who I don't always agree with and I'm
going to make a video on t YT and why I
think people should trust T YT even
though I don't always agree with them on
a lot of things but why I think you
should anyways I want to get into that
I'll make a video if you want to watch
it you can watch that okay but Kyle all
he does is talk shit about Democratic
Party all I do is talk shit about the
Democratic Party how much I hate them
and how much I will do anything anyway
it takes to get these people out of
office people will watch this and I feel
like you're part of the Democratic Party
and and so she so she's trying to show
how they're part of the party and
they're playing Jedi Mind Tricks with
you and you see what I mean man that's
horrible man I consider if the conflict
of interest of a media organization even
creating a third party fundraising pact
to be allocating funds to politicians
then that should not be done and I don't
care if it's the Justice Democrats doing
it through the Young Turks or any media
outlet organization doing that that is
an inherent conflict of interest we're
trying to get
rushon out of politics the corruption of
money out of politics and yes that means
keeping corporate money out of our of
our political campaigns it often means
not putting the media in the middle of
putting media money into a political
campaign not unless you trust those news
those people who are doing this which a
lot of us do because a lot of us see day
after day that all they do is rail
against the Democratic Party so we trust
in them and we feel like you know what
these people are starting an
organization
let's support it because they obviously
agree with us because as for some people
out there who might think they're
playing Jedi Mind Tricks I don't because
I don't know what kind of trick it is to
go out every single day and put
thousands of videos and bashing the
Democratic Party how that's going to get
you to like the Democratic Party okay so
yes I agree
I like secular talk I like TYT and I
agree with them as far as this I don't
agree with TYT I agree with secular talk
almost mostly everything he talks about
to be honest with you not everything but
a lot ninety percent TYT and it's not so
much 90 percent not some of the hosts
anyways but if I agree with them yeah
the reason I don't agree with
corporations and stuff is because the
corporations have vested interests in
doing things against us I don't think
they have secular talk or TYT have
interest in going against that I think
they're with us so yes I support them
and if they want to do something I will
support it because video after video
they show me that they do support us
it's not because I'm trying to be a
defeatist I think if you listened to my
concerns they are they are they are
legitimate they are fair points they are
things that absolutely should be
considered and any organization should
expect this kind of scrutiny and this is
a big difference yes you want to
scrutinize what they're doing fine you
want to give them you want to tell them
this in
you guys should address election fraud
because I had a really big experience
with it or whatever you whatever your
grievances are okay I don't have a
problem with that what I have a problem
is the way is how you're doing it
because it matters how you talk it
matters how you say things okay and for
you to go around telling people that do
not support them because they don't
there they're not doing it the way I
want them to do it is absolutely
horrible you are not a progressive if
you believe that I agree I believe in
any kind of way you can get progressives
in office and it doesn't I support every
every way anything third parties it
doesn't matter
same regret she was not doing that and
that's horrible and I do not trust her
anymore and I will never watch her again
because of this because if she came on
and said what she said what she said in
in a different manner then I would be
like okay yeah she has some concerns
okay that's cool me hopefully they
listen to her and you know they they
come out and address these issues but
don't do what you just did
telling people to disregard them and
they're never going to win and no one's
ever going to get into office because
I'm accent fraud and even though there's
progressives in in office so it's not
impossible it might be hard but not
impossible and because they didn't check
in with you people who listen to st.
progressives and aren't they're going to
come and bash me a hundred percent it
doesn't matter even though I'm telling
you and she has valid point and I
disagree with how she's doing this and
I'm even and I'll even tell you that I
used to watch her and she hasn't she is
a progressive so it kind of hurts me to
do this but I have to do it I have to do
it if you're going to do that if you're
going to try and split people in not
going in whatever direction it takes to
get people that we trust into office
then to me you're not a friend anymore
you're an enemy okay now I will support
I mean enemy in the terms of I'm not
going to I'm not going to bother paying
attention to what you're talking about
anymore
now I come across you had a candidate
that you were supporting that was
progressive you say I'm going to support
that candidate I don't care if I don't
like
you and what you just did that person
believes in my policies seem progressive
supports them I'll support them I don't
care this is the difference I will
support anything that she does as long
as it's to further the policies of
progressive she's not doing that and
that's not right and that's why I made
this video because that's horrible
anyways let me know you guys think
comment below guys if you like this
content please subscribe and please at
least back me up because there's going
to keep people that are going to be
reaming me thanks guys
For more infomation >> Sane Progressive Loses Her Mind Justice Democrats - Duration: 28:36.-------------------------------------------
if you must. - Duration: 2:45.
soo, where are you?
leave me alone
I have to go now
did my soon deok receive lots of love from the prince?
they loved each other very very much
life is like a dream
it hurts
how can it be like this?
I'm sorry for leaving you alone.
-------------------------------------------
How to Improve Your Communication Skills • The Key to Developing Successful Relationships - Duration: 5:33.
We think that Communication is simply the fact of sending A Message.
A concept or an idea comes into your mind and we use different ways to share it
But we forget something essential In this video, I want to show you how to improve
your communication skills And use them to build strong and successful
relationships.
We spend our childhood learning things We learn History, Geography, Chemistry ...
But when do we learn how to communicate?
Society expects you to learn on the fly, on your own.
We grew up and became "Adults", But usually, nobody showed us how to communicate
effectively.
If you have problems with your intimate relationships, at work or with clients;
Many times, it's because you lack communication skills.
I had those same problems.
That's why I want to give you the tools that helped me to better understand how communication
works, But mostly, they helped me build better relationships.
At the end of this video, apply what you learned and notice that you will deliver your messages
more effectively.
First, let's look at the pillars of Communication and think where could you improve.
Assertiveness, Clarity and Listening: The first principle is Assertiveness: This
is the power that fuels your message to come out of your mind
At the end, you want to make an impact so you need the confidence that your idea is
worth it.
A weak communication is not going to give you the results you expect:
Imagine it as a rocket going into space, if the rocket doesn't have enough power, it
won't be able to leave the atmosphere, it will fall and explode.
If you want to communicate your ideas, you have to be assertive.
The second principle is Clarity: This is the way you send your message.
Think of it as the truck that transports the idea from your mind to the mind of someone
else.
That's why clarity is so important If you are unclear, your message will be understood
in a distorted way You have to learn to articulate your messages.
Finally, the third principle is Listening Skills: People want to feel that they are
being listened to.
You need to be open and aware that you're not the only one sending messages,
The other person wants to communicate theirs too.
You have to keep an open mind and listen to what others have to say.
People will be open to understand you're message only if you're also interested in
listening to them.
Keep in mind these three principles And work on them.
You will improve the skills to communicate more effectively with people.
But to build deeper and more meaningful relationships, You will have to consider another concept,
much more counter-intuitive than the first three.
You'll need to understand the following: "The success of MY communication comes from
YOUR response, regardless of MY intention."
This presents the concept of Empathy.
A message can be delivered successfully IF the person understood it correctly.
Not too long ago, I almost had a huge fight with my girlfriend.
She asked me how she looked, I replied 'Ok' without much enthusiasm.
She was really offended and a little bit sad.
To be clear, I think she's beautiful but I was distracted, and while she expected me
to say, "Oh my God!
You look delightful!"; I just say "Ok" She wasn't expecting that.
I had two options: The first one was to defend my position, no
matter what.
Fight with my girlfriend and try to defend my "Ok".
Justifying that I was tired and distracted.
This is what most people do.
The second option, requires more emotional maturity:
It is to recognize that my message hurt her feelings
And accept that my communication gets meaning from her response, regardless of my intention.
Now, let me ask you something: Do you prefer to defend your position?
How's that working for you?
You need send your message with more empathy Don't just consider your own intentions,
think on how they will react.
I'm not saying that you become weak, On the contrary, I want you to be aware that
your words have power, therefore you have to anticipate how the other person will receive
them.
I propose that you get rid of your narcissistic need to defend your intention and focus on
how to communicate more effectively.
Empathy is crucial to communicate better.
Start to practice this principle.
If you're not use to it, you will feel uncomfortable early on, but keep practicing, just remember
the following:
The success of your conversation comes from the listener's response, regardless of your
intention.
The key is to consider the feelings of the other person.
And If they respond to you in a way you didn't expect, don't be offended.
Instead look for a better way to communicate your intentions
So that their response matches your intention It's that simple.
Develop this basic principles of communication, And you will build stronger and more meaningful
relationships.
Next time you try to communicate a message or an idea remember:
Be Assertive Be clear
Listen, But above all, have Empathy.
Don't fight to defend your position, Instead keep improving your communication
skills And study how to reflect your intentions more
effectively.
Thank you for watching If you liked this video please subscribe.
Full Perception was created to help you understand concepts that usually nobody teaches us
So I hope you will join us on this journey Finally, don't forget to go to fullperception.com
for more exclusive content See you soon.
-------------------------------------------
The Flash 1x06 Promo "The Flash Is Born" (SUB ITA) - Duration: 0:20.
What exactly did you hit?
A big, bad man.
You'd have to hit him at approximately...
Mach 1.1.
He would create a sonic boom,
which, as I've said before, would be...
YOU'LL FIND THE ITALIAN SUBTITLES EVERY WEDNESDAY ON www.traduttorianonimi.it
-------------------------------------------
How powerful is your passport - Duration: 1:09.
If you're an American you can travel to 174
out of 219 countries and territories
without visa. Hi everyone it's Abhinaya here. iIf
you're anything like me you love to
travel but depending on where you live
it might be super difficult to travel
because of visa. This led me to see which
country has been most powerful passports
such that you can travel the countries
without getting visa beforehand. The
number one spot goes to Germany. If
you're a German passport holder you can
travel the 176 countries without getting
a visa or visa on arrival. Second place
goes to Sweden with 175 countries and
third is tied between five countries
where you can travel to 174 countries
Denmark, Finland, Italy, Spain, and United
States. The country with the least privileges
is Afghanistan with only 24 visa free
countries that you can travel to.
This is one of the ways where privileges shine.
So it might be possible to travel the
world but first you need to make sure
you can enter that country. So until next
time to keep learning.
-------------------------------------------
The Flash 1x06 Extended Promo "The Flash Is Born" (SUB ITA) - Duration: 0:31.
I don't know where you came from.
I don't know your name,
but I have seen you do the impossible.
What exactly did you hit?
A man. A big, bad man.
How do I fight a guy that's made of steel?
You'd have to hit him at approximately...
Mach 1.1.
He would create a sonic boom,
which, as I've said before, would be...
YOU'LL FIND THE ITALIAN SUBTITLES EVERY WEDNESDAY ON www.traduttorianonimi.it
-------------------------------------------
The Evidence for Reincarnation Scientifically Documented True S - Duration: 18:30.
The Evidence
for Reincarnation- Scientifically Documented True Stories That Prove Past Lives Are Real
By Ervin Lazlo and Anthony Peake
A case reported by Stevenson involved a Burmese girl called Ma Tin Aung Myo.
She claimed to be the reincarnation of a Japanese soldier killed during the Second World War.
The case spans huge cultural differences between the person reporting the experiences and the
individual whose experiences she reports.
Reincarnation Experiences
There is evidence that at least some, and possibly all, people have previously existed
in another body and lived another existence.
When anomalous �memories� appear as personal recollections, those who experience them tend
to believe that they stem from their own previous life.
However, the memories that surface in consciousness are not likely to be past-life recollections.
Instead, they appear to be �experiences of the reincarnation-type.� The latter are
widespread as well.
Stories suggestive of reincarnation are not limited, whether geographically or culturally.
They occur in all corners of the planet and among people of all cultures.
There is of course more to reincarnation than memories.
For reincarnation to have actually taken place the consciousness of the foreign personality
must have entered the body of the experiencing subject.
In esoteric literature this is known as the transmigration of the spirit or soul.
It is said to occur in the womb, perhaps already at conception or shortly afterward, when the
rhythmic pulses begin that develop into the heart of the embryo.
The spirit or soul of an individual does not necessarily migrate to another individual.
Buddhist teachings, for example, tell us that the soul or spirit does not always reincarnate
on the earthly plane and in a human form.
It may not reincarnate at all, evolving to a spiritual domain from where it either does
not return or returns only to fulfill a task it was to accomplish in its preceding incarnation.
But what concerns us here is the possibility that reincarnation could truly occur.
Can the consciousness that was the consciousness of a living person reappear in the consciousness
of another?
In his book The Power Within, British psychiatrist Alexander Cannon wrote that the evidence on
this score is too strong to be dismissed:
For years the theory of reincarnation was a nightmare to me and I did my best to disprove
it and even argued with my trance subjects to the effect that they were talking nonsense.
Yet as the years went by one subject after another told me the same story in spite of
different and varied conscious beliefs.
Now well over a thousand cases have been so investigated and I have to admit that there
is such a thing as reincarnation.
Variations and Variables in Reincarnation-Type Experiences
Perhaps the main variable is the age of the person who has a reincarnation-type experience.
Those who do are mostly children between the ages of two and six.
After the age of eight the experiences tend to fade and, with few exceptions, vanish entirely
in adolescence.
The manner in which the reincarnated personality has died is yet another variable.
Those who suffered a violent death seem to be more frequently reincarnated than those
who died in a natural way.
Reincarnation stories tend to be clear and distinct in children, whereas in adults they
are mostly indistinct, appearing as vague hunches and impressions.
The more widespread among them are the d�j� vu: recognizing a site or a happening one
sees for the first time as familiar.
The sensation of d�j� connu, encountering a person for the first time with a sense of
having known him or her before, also occurs, but less frequently.
Whether reincarnation stories convey verifiable information, evidence and proof about places,
people, and events has been tested in reference to eyewitness testimonies and birth and residence
certificates.
The experiences often turn out to be corroborated by witnesses as well as by documents.
Sometimes even minute details correspond to real events, persons, and sites.
Vivid reincarnation stories are accompanied by corresponding patterns of behavior.
Behaviors suggestive of the reincarnated personality appear even when that personality was of a
different generation and a different gender.
A young child could manifest the values and behaviors of an elderly person of the opposite
sex from the past life.
The pioneering research on recent reincarnation stories is the work of Ian Stevenson, a Canadian-American
psychiatrist who worked at the University of Virginia School of Medicine.
During more than four decades, Stevenson investigated the reincarnation-type experiences of thousands
of children, both in the West and in the East.
Some of the past life memories recounted by the children have been verified as the experience
of a person who had lived previously, and whose death matched the impressions reported
by the child.
Sometimes the child carried a birthmark associated with the death of the person with whom he
or she identified, such as an indentation or discoloration on the part of the body where
a fatal bullet entered, or a malformation on a hand or the foot the deceased had lost.
In a path-breaking essay published in 1958, �The Evidence for Survival from Claimed
Memories of Former Incarnations,� Stevenson analyzed the evidence from reincarnation stories
of children and presented narratives on seven of the cases.
These past life cases turned out to be verifiable, with the incidents recounted by the children
recorded in often obscure local journals and articles.
The Proof of Reincarnation: Stories of First Hand Experience
In 1942 Burma was under Japanese occupation.
The Allies regularly bombed the Japanese supply lines, particularly the railways.
The village of Na-Thul was no exception, being close to the important railway station at
Puang.
Regular attacks made life very hard for the villagers, who were trying their best to survive.
Indeed, survival meant getting along with the Japanese occupiers.
For villager Daw Aye Tin (who was later to be the mother of Ma Tin Aung Myo) this meant
discussing the relative merits of Burmese and Japanese food with the stocky, regularly
bare-chested Japanese army cook who was stationed in the village.The war ended, and life returned
to a semblance of normality.
In early 1953 Daw found herself pregnant with her fourth child.
The pregnancy was normal, with the odd exception of a reoccurring dream in which the Japanese
cook, with whom she had long lost contact, would follow her and announce that he was
coming to stay with her family.
On December 26, 1953, Daw gave birth to a daughter and called her Ma Tin Aung Myo.
The baby was perfect with one small exception: a thumb-sized birthmark on her groin.
As the child grew up it was noted that she had a great fear of aircraft.
Every time one flew overhead she would become agitated and cry.
Her father, U Aye Maung, was intrigued by this, as the war had been over many years
and aircraft were now simply machines of transport rather than weapons of war.
It was therefore strange that Ma was afraid that the aircraft would shoot at her.
The child became more and more morose, stating that she wanted to �go home.� Later �home�
became more specific; she wanted to return to Japan.
When asked why this was the case, she stated that she had memories of being a Japanese
soldier based in Na-Thul.
She knew that she had been killed by machine-gun fire from an aircraft, and this is why she
feared airplanes so much.
As Ma Tin Aung Myo grew older she accessed more past life memories of the life of her
previous personality.
She was later to tell Ian Stevenson that she remembered that the previous personality came
from Northern Japan and that he had five children, the eldest being a boy, and that he had been
an army cook.
From then on the past life memories became more precise.
She remembered that she (as the Japanese soldier) was near a pile of firewood next to an acacia
tree.
She described wearing short pants and no shirt.
An Allied aircraft spotted him and strafed the area around him.
He ran for cover: as he did so, he was hit by a bullet in the groin, which killed him
instantly.
She described the plane as having two tails.
This was later identified as substantial reincarnation evidence, being a Lockheed P-38 Lightning,
an aircraft used by the Allies in the Burma campaign.
In her teens Ma Tin Aung Myo showed distinct masculine traits.
She cropped her hair short and refused to wear female clothing.
Between 1972 and 1975 Ma Tin Aung Myo was interviewed three times about her reincarnation
memories by Ian Stevenson.
She explained that she wanted to be married to a woman and had a steady girlfriend.
She said that she did not like the hot climate of Burma nor its spicy food.
She much preferred highly sweetened curry dishes.
When she was younger she loved to eat semi-raw fish, only losing this preference when a fish
bone stuck in her throat.Reincarnation Story 2: Paddy Fields Tragedy
Stevenson described how a Sri Lankan girl remembered a past life in which she had drowned
in a flooded paddy field.
She described that a bus had driven past and splashed her with water just before she died.
Subsequent research searching for the proof of this reincarnation found that a girl in
a nearby village had drowned after she had stepped back to avoid a passing bus while
walking on a narrow road above flooded paddy fields.
She fell backward into deep water and died.
The girl who manifested this experience had, from a very early age, shown an irrational
fear of buses; she would also get hysterical if taken near deep water.
She had a fondness for bread and had a liking for sweet food.
This was unusual, in that her family did not like either.
However, the previous personality was noted for both of these preferences.
Reincarnation Story 3: The Case of Swarnlata Mishra
Another typical Stevenson case was that of Swarnlata Mishra, born in a small village
in Madhya Pradesh in 1948.
When she was three years old she began having spontaneous past-life memories of being a
girl called Biya Pathak, who lived in a village more than a hundred miles away.
She described that the house Biya lived in had four rooms and was painted white.
She began to sing songs that she claimed she used to know, together with complex dance
routines that were unknown to her present family and friends.
Six years later she recognized some people who had been her friends in the past life.
This stimulated her father to start writing down what she said and searching for proof
of her reincarnation.
Her case generated interest outside of the village.
One investigator who visited the city discovered that a woman who matched the description given
by Swarnlata had died nine years previously.
Investigations subsequently confirmed that a young girl called Biya had lived in just
such a house in that town.
Swarnlata�s father decided to take his daughter to the town and to have her introduced to
members of Biya�s family.
As a test to see if she indeed was a reincarnated personality, the family introduced people
who were not related to the child.
Swarnlata immediately identified these individuals as being imposters.
Indeed some details of her past life memories were so precise that all were amazed.
Reincarnation Story 4: Patrick Christenson and His Brother
One case offering substantial reincarnation proof was that of Patrick Christenson, who
was born by cesarean section in Michigan in March 1991.
His elder brother, Kevin, had died of cancer twelve years earlier at the age of two.
Early evidence of Kevin�s cancer was presented six months prior to his death when he began
to walk and had a noticeable limp.
One day he fell and broke his leg.
Tests were done, and after a biopsy on a small nodule in his scalp, just above his right
ear, it was discovered that little Kevin had metastatic cancer.
Soon tumors were found growing in other locations in his body.
One such growth caused his eye to protrude and eventually resulted in blindness in that
eye.
Kevin was given chemotherapy, which resulted in scars on the right-hand side of his neck.
He eventually died of his illness, three weeks after his second birthday.
At birth Patrick had a slanting birthmark with the appearance of a small cut on the
right side of his neck, exactly the same location as Kevin�s chemotherapy scar, showing startling
evidence of reincarnation.
He also had a nodule on his scalp just above his right ear and a clouding of his left eye,
which was diagnosed as a corneal leukoma.
When he began to walk it was with a distinct limp, again, offering further proof of reincarnation.
When he was almost four and a half he said to his mother that he wanted to go back to
his old orange and brown house.
This was the exact coloring of the house in which the family had lived in 1979 when Kevin
was alive.
He then asked if she remembered him having surgery.
She replied that she could not because this had never happened to him.
Patrick then pointed to a place just above his right ear.
He added that he didn�t remember the actual operation because he was asleep, which was
consistent with details of Kevin�s past life.
Reincarnation Story 5: Ancestral Memories of Sam Taylor
Another case offering substantial proof of reincarnation involved an eighteen-month-old
boy called Sam Taylor.
As his diaper was being changed he looked up at his father and said, �When I was your
age I used to change your diapers.� Later Sam disclosed details about his grandfather�s
life that were completely accurate.
He said that his grandfather�s sister had been murdered and that his grandmother had
made milkshakes for his grandfather using a food processor.
Sam�s parents were adamant that none of these subjects had been discussed in his presence.
When he was four years old, Sam was shown a group of old family pictures spread out
on a table.
Sam happily identified his grandfather every time with the announcement, �That�s me!�
In an attempt to test him, his mother selected an old school class photograph showing the
grandfather as a young boy.
There were sixteen other boys in the photograph.
Sam immediately pointed to one of them, once again announcing that that was him.
He was right.
What the Evidence Tells Us
Reincarnation-type experiences can be vivid and convincing to the extent that they appear
to be testimony and evidence that a previously living personality has been incarnated in
the subject.
This belief is strengthened by the observation that birthmarks on the body of the subject
correspond to the bodily features of the person whom he or she seems to incarnate.
This is most strikingly the case when the past life personality suffered bodily injury.
The corresponding marks or deformations sometimes reappear in the subject, seeming to offer
proof that reincarnation is indeed occurring.
Many observers of this phenomenon, including Stevenson himself, held that matching birthmarks
are significant evidence for reincarnation.
However, the coincidence of birthmarks and other bodily features in a child with the
fate of a previously existing person is not necessarily assurance that that person is
reincarnated in the child.
It could also be that the brain and body of the child with the given birthmarks and bodily
features are especially adapted to recall the experience of a personality with analogous
birthmarks and deformities.
-------------------------------------------
Love and death - Patriotic enthusiasm [ HD; ENG; RU SUB ] - Duration: 1:26.
For more infomation >> Love and death - Patriotic enthusiasm [ HD; ENG; RU SUB ] - Duration: 1:26. -------------------------------------------
Extraterrestrial Shot Dead in New Jersey Case Review by JP - Duration: 13:25.
Extraterrestrial Shot Dead in New Jersey (Case Review by JP)
In 1978, an incredible incident allegedly took place in New Jersey, USA, which has somehow
evaded both the attention of many UFO researchers and the mainstream community alike.
Two adjacent military bases Fort Dix and Fort McGuire played host to an incredible extraterrestrial
and UFO encounter.
UFOs were sighted flying over the bases during the early morning hours of January 18, and
shortly afterwards Air Force security patrol were ordered to the back gate of McGuire AFB
to allow entry to New Jersey State Police who were searching for something, but what?
State trooper Sgt.
Jeff Morse (pseudonym) was one of the airmen on duty and was told that a Fort Dix MP was
pursuing a low-flying object that had hovered so close that it was actually just above his
car.
Then according to the MP a small being with a large head and slender body appeared in
front of his car, causing him to panic and shoot the alien several times with a .45 automatic.
The being then fled over the fence which separates the two bases, before collapsing on the deserted
runway and dying.
The body was found lying on the runway by Morse and his colleagues before other "blue
beret" forces unfamiliar to Morse and his companion took over once Morse had followed
the routine procedure of cordoning off the area of the "crime scene".
Later that day a C-141 cargo aircraft arrived from Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, where a team
crated up the body, loaded it on board, before taking off.
Morse and other participants were taken to Wright- Patterson AFB two days later where
they interrogated and warned not to talk about the incident to anyone.
(Morse supplied the names of the interrogation team taken from their name badges, and their
identities have been verified.)
The information that follows is taken from the MUFON Symposium Proceedings, "THE FATAL
ENCOUNTER AT FT.
DIX-McGUIRE: A CASE STUDY; Status Report IV." by Leonard H. Stringfield.
The setting at Wright-Patterson was like that of a court martial, a table and chairs in
an unadorned room which Morse describes as follows: "While there we were all together
except for actual interrogations.
Mine had two men, one apparently a civilian with pipe and beard who never spoke.
At one point there were three men.
One played nice guy, one mean guy, and, of course, the silent civilian.
All they wanted to know was the nature of the incident, what I knew and then told me
about my duty to keep my mouth shut...
I signed a form and it is supposed to bind me for life."
Never once, as Morse recalls, did any of the interrogators offer information or an explanation
of the incident.
Nor did anyone ever refer to the retrieved dead body or suggest that it may have been
of extraterrestrial origin.
Said Morse, "they beat around the bush, all references to it were indirect."
The day after the interrogation, Morse returned to McGuire, was debriefed by his Commanding
Officer, Lt. Col. FM, and released for normal duty.
The incident, he said, was not discussed again by anyone as though it never happened.
Morse was debriefed by his commanding officer, a lieutenant colonel shortly after returning
to McGuire AFB and heard no more about the incident.
But it wasn't long before each of the airmen who had been involved was transferred to a
separate overseas base.
Morse was shipped to Okinawa, Japan.
Morse was within 40 to 70 feet from the dead body on the abandoned runway #5 at various
times during his patrol duty but was never close enough to observe details such as facial
features, or its hands and feet.
However, under the glare of truck headlights, Morse did recall seeing the skin of the naked
hairless body which he described as being wet, shiny, and snake-like.
As reported in his initial letter, the entity was about 4 feet in height with a large head,
slender torso, thin arms and legs, and overall, of greyish-brown colouration.
The humanoid which was not human, seems to fit the anatomical description so often heard
from military sources who have made claim to having seen entities at crash sites in
the past and most likely fits the Zeta-Reticulan model commonly referred to as the Greys.
UFO researcher Leonard Stringfield wrote to the man using the pseudonym Sgt.
Morse, to hear his version of events.
Below is a copy of the letter Stringfield received as a reply to his correspondence:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE TM SECURITY POLICE SQUADRON (PACAF)
APO SAN FRANCISCO 96239
REPLY TO: (deleted) ATTN OF: (deleted)
(deleted) SUBJECT:
Response for Request of Information in Palation to U~ Contact
and other Related information TO: Len Stringfield
1.
In January of 1978, I was station at McGuire AFB, N.J..
One evening , during the time frame of 0300 hrs. and O500 hrs., there were a number of
UFO sightings in the area over the air field and Ft.
DIX Army camp.
I am a security policeman and was on routine patrol at the time.
N.J.
State Police, and Ft.
Dix MP's were running code in the direction of Brownsville, N.J..
A state trooper then entered Gate #5 at the rear of the base requesting assistance and
permission to enter.
I was dispatched and the trooper wanted access to the runway area which led to the very back
of the air field and connected with a heavily wooded area which is part of the Dix training
area.
He informed me that a Ft.
Dix MP was pursuing a low flying object which then hovered over his car.
He described it as oval shaped, with no details, and glowing with a blueish green color.
His radio transmission was cut off.
At that time in front of his police car, appeared a thing, about 4 ft. tall, greyish, brown,
fat head, long arms, and slender body.
The MP panicked and fired five rounds from his .45 Cal into the thing, and one round
into the object above.
The object then fled straight up and joined with eleven others high in the sky.
This we all saw but didn't know the details at the time.
Anyway, The thing ran into the woods towards our fence line and they wanted to look for
it.
By this time several patrols were involved.
2.
We found the body of the thing near the runway.
It had apparently climbed the fence and died while running.
It was all of a sudden hush-hush and no one was allowed near the area.
We roped off the area and AF OSI came out and took over.
That was the last I saw of it.
There was a bad stench coming from it too.
Like ammonia smelling but it wasn't constant in the air.
That day, a team from Wright-Patterson AFB came in a C-141 and went to the area.
They crated it in a wooden box, sprayed something over it, and then put it into a bigger metal
container.
They loaded it in the plane and took off.
That was it, nothing more said, no report made and we were all told not to have anything
to say about it or we would be court-martialed.
3.
I will be getting out of the air force in about two months.
Do Not disclose my name as I could get into trouble.
I am interested in pursuing this and other matters if you need help.
Forgive me for not signing this but I can't take any chances.
Please reply to the above address and my parents will forward it to me or I will be home already.
Don't send it here because they monitor all mail closely and I again don't want to take
any chances.
Another military figure has come forward in connection to the remarkable incident in New
Jersey, but he has been brave enough to use his actual name.
Major George Filer now retired (see image above), who was also stationed at McGuire
AFB in 1978 was serving as an intelligence officer at the time of the incident and although
he was not on duty that morning, he was witness to a lot of unusual activity and he heard
talk about the "alien body" the following morning.
Discussing the case with Dr. Steven Greer for The Disclosure Project, Filer said "This
particular morning, when I went into the command post, I was met by the head of the command
post, and he said that it [had] been a very exciting evening - that [we'd] had UFOs over
McGuire all night, that one had apparently landed or crashed at Fort Dix, and that when
a military policeman came upon the alien, that he had pulled out a gun and shot him."He
told researcher Richard Hall "Our security police went out there and found him at the
end of the runway dead.
They asked me to brief the general staff," but was later told not to.
In Greer's book Disclosure, Major Filer continued, "The security police were out there and had
captured the body, so to speak, and were guarding it.
He said that a C-141 from Wright-Patterson was coming in to pick up the body.
That made me stand up, because I didn't realize that Wright-Patterson had C-141s."
Filer was then told by his superiors that "We want you to brief us at the standup general
briefing this morning and explain what happened to everybody".
"And, I said you want me to tell General Tom Sandler and everybody in the command post
that we captured an alien?!
They said, "Yes, we want you to brief them this morning."
Well, I did some checking around, and I called the 38th Military Airlift Wing Command Post
to check with them to see if the story was the same I was given.
They said, yes, that they had heard the same information; they said that this actually
did happen - that an alien was found on the base."
Filer is not new to UFO sightings either.
He also chased a UFO over England when flying for the U.S. Air Force.
"I didn't believe in UFOs until London Control called us in the winter of 1962 and asked
us would we chase one?
So we said sure."
Since that day he has maintained an interest in the subject, claiming that "I personally
have observed a UFO both visually and on radar.
I've been chasing them ever since,".
Despite the apparent lack of physical evidence to legitimise this particular case, it is
certainly consistent with other stories of a similar kind.
The secrecy, the threats, the involvement of Wright-Patterson AFB once again as the
site to house and conceal extraterrestrial bodies and craft.
To delve deeper into this case click HERE to read Leo Stringfield's investigation in
more depth.
-------------------------------------------
How Does Parliament Work? - Duration: 2:55.
In the UK our government consists of
the Queen
Parliament
and the executive which is the Prime Minister and his or her cabinet
The Prime Minister and his or her cabinet consists almost entirely of Members of Parliament which are you might have already guessed this
From parliament
Oh and quite importantly, the Prime Minister cannot actually get anything done
cannot run the country
or pass laws,
without the consent of Parliament.
so it's safe to say that the Prime Minister relies pretty heavily on Parliament.
Parliament has two houses,
One called the house of commons which consists of 650 individual MPs, or Members of parliament
Which each represent one consitituency in the UK
Every four or five years there is a general election,
Which is when the constituents the people who live in a constituency
Get to decide who their MP is by voting,
Because of this, the House of Commons is often refered to as the elected chamber in contrast to
The house of lords. The house of lords is not elected and instead is made up of about 800 Lords, who are not elected.
But hey, wait a minute you haven't actually explained how Parliament works?
We know how it gets elected, but what's it doing in that time between elections?
When Parliament is in session, when it is active, most of the time is spent debating,
scrutinising,
amending,
voting on
and, eventually turning bills into laws
Both houses have the power to create and scuritinise bills which are what laws are before they are passed by Parliament.
However it is mostly the house of commons that starts off bills and the House of Lords cannot actually prevent a Bill from becoming a Law or reject it, they can only delay it.
This is because the House of Commons is the upper house and the elected house, they are the house most in touch with ordinary people so are therefore more likely to represent the views of the public, so it is said.
For a Bill to become a law, it must pass
multiple readings,
Committees
and votes in both houses
all of which scrutinise and possibly amend the bill and ensure that it is the best possible legislation in the eyes of both houses.
Once a bill has passed all of these stages which is often quite rare,
it will be signed into law by the Queen,
a process know as 'Royal Assent'
So that's how Parliament works, pretty confusing isn't it?
Thanks for watching and please like, share and definitely subscribe.
-------------------------------------------
The History of Internet in the 1990s - Duration: 10:31.
Before everything, we have to say what's the Internet, how and why it was born.
Internet is an evolution of "Arpanet", which was the first computer network ever created;
In fact it was created in 1969 and officially closed in 1990.
Its purpose was to keep in contact a lot of governative computers in the USA during the
Cold War, mostly for defensive reasons.
In the years Universities started to use this network to keep themselves in contact and
even other countries created national networks (such as the French CYCLADES or the Norwegian NORSAR)
to connect to the Arpanet; between 1982 and 1983 Arpanet was officially replaced
by the Internet, which still link all the nations of the world and lost its primal defensive
purposes.
But when Internet became as we know it?
The Net is continually evolving but it reached most of its important goals in the 1990s:
let's see what happened with a timeline.
1990: Arpanet officially closed because of its evolution in Internet: as we said before
it already lost its military purposes in 1983 (when the US government created the secret
MILNET) and it started to be used by Universities to communicate.
In 1990 was also created the HyperText Markup Language.
It was mostly born to format and typeset the first Internet hypertextual documents and
it's still updating!
It's still important in its simplicity for the actual websites even if there are a lot
of others markup languages.
1991: The CERN announced the creation of the World Wide Web, whose inventor is Tim Berners-Lee.
Already in 1989 he exposed his idea to create a database project to connect all the documents
in the Internet, then in the next years he used the Uniform Resource Locators (URLs)
to identify everything in the Internet, the already mentioned HTML and the Hypertext Transfer
Protocol (HTTP), which was created in 1991 to transmit hypertexts by a client-server structure.
From this moment the WWW will become the most important service in the Internet to link
almost everything: the original version of the website is still available and opened
to all the people who wants to visit it.
1992: The Internet Society (ISOC) was born.
The ISOC it's still a non-profit organization founded to provide leadership in nternet-related
standards, education, access, and policy.
It states that its mission is "to promote the open development, evolution and use of
the Internet for the benefit of all people throughout the world.".
It has its headquarters in Reston, Virginia, and its offices in Geneva, Switzerland.
1993: Mosaic, the most important web browser in the early years of Internet, was created
by Marc Andreessen and Eric Bina.
Mosaic was a real innovation for the World Wide Web: it was the first browser to visualize
picture with the other texts: other browsers in fact had to open other windows to show
them.
Meanwhile, the CERN officially made the "WWW" a public domain, pretending no copyright:
before, it was used for scientific divulgation and research.
1994: The White House created its own website: it's one of the first governments to use Internet.
Initial commerce sites are established and mass marketing campaigns are launched by
email, introducing the term "spamming" to the Internet vocabulary.
Also Marc Andreessen and Jim Clark start Netscape Communications.
They introduce the Navigator browser, which soon will replace definitely Mosaic.
1995: National Science Foundation stopped to finance the Internet project: from this
moment there will not be restrictions on Internet commercial use.
The CRS4 (Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia) also developes
the first web-mail software.
In 1995 W3C, the World Wide Web Consortium was officially born too.
1996: Internet reaches a very important goal: in this year almost 10 milions of computers
use Internet worldwide: the Web era has already started.
1997: Mosaic was updated for the last time to the 3.0 version: infact, from this moment the project
will be abandoned, simply because people started to use other browsers, such as the Microsoft
Internet Explorer, which was more efficient.
In December Jorn Barger creates the "weblog" term to describe that kind of websites used
as a sort of "diary" by the creators.
1998: From this year the blog-revolution starts: people all over the world started to create
milions of personal weblogs thanks to OpenDiary.
1999: In the last year of the 20th century Napster, the first file-sharing system, was
born.
The Internet users in this moment are over 200 milions: I want to remember that just
three years before, in 1996, they were only 10 milions.
Also Peter Merholz uses for the first time the term "blog" in his site, splitting
ironically the word created in 1997 by Barger in "we blog".
As you can see, the 90s were definitely the most important years for the Internet rise:
in those years Internet lost his military, scientific and academic purposes to be accessible
to all the people.
I also want to say that this video is just a quick summary of what happened to Internet
in ten long years, we could talk about a lot of other things: but if you are interested in
the topic you can depeen it by yourself!
Finally, I want to thank you for watching this video and I hope you enjoyed it.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét