Hi this is Dr. Hackie Reitman, welcome to another episode of Exploring Different Brains.
Today we have one of the grand daddy's of Autism down here in Florida, Dr. Michael Alessandri
who has been a professor down at the University of Miami for 20 years in psychology.
He's also the head of CARD, the center for autism and related disabilities at University
of Miami and Nova Southeastern University, and he does about a gazillion other things
so welcome Michael, thanks for being here.
Thank you, I'm happy to be here.
I'm happy to be called a granddaddy, that's a first, it tells me I'm moving in the right
direction.
You're a young grand daddy.
You're one of the super stars.
Thank you.
We were talking before so I want to share with our Different Brains audience how you
got into this.
You've been doing it for so many years now.
Yeah, and it's been a great journey.
I'm one of the lucky ones.
In 1981 when I graduated high school, my parents put a lot of pressure on me to work because
I hadn't worked in high school.
I was one of those studious book smart kind of kids.
One summer day I went with a friend of mine to a summer camp for kids with disabilities
and they asked me to spend the day with just one boy because they knew I wasn't going to
be there the whole summer.
At the end of that day, after spending one day with this boy Marlon who was 10 years
old, African American, with autism; it just changed my life.
I went home that night literally and told my parents this is what I'm going to do for
the rest of my life.
I didn't know if I were going to be a teacher or a doctor or what, but I knew that people
with Autism would be in my life in some way.
And that was 36 years ago.
Now why do you think that was?
I got chills when you were saying that.
But why do you think that is?
I still get chills when I tell that story because it was like a lightning bolt; it was
just one of those magic moments where you discover your path.
I think what happened with me and Marlon was the things that he could do as well as the
things that he couldn't do really intrigued me.
I was very intrigued by the way he approached social interaction with me and communication.
He wasn't talking, completely nonverbal but yet he had this capacity to kind of connect
with me emotionally and socially and I felt that really deeply even with one day of an
interaction with him.
He was holding my hand, and stood very close to me just after an hour or so.
We just developed this kind of non-spoken connection.
And just the way he solved problems and approached different work tasks they would give him,
the way he navigated around the classroom and through the campus it just intrigued me.
Because on one hand you have this boy who is non verbal and clearly intellectually disabled
in many ways in terms of the way he was processing information, yet he had this remarkable capacity
to connect on a deep nonverbal level and also solve these ridiculously complex tasks that
were in front of him as well like puzzles and other kinds of activities I'd present
him with.
So just the discrepancy between what he could do easily and what he couldn't do that should
have been easy that was really complicated for him just really was mind boggling to me.
Are you still in touch with Marlon?
No I'm not but you know what's interesting is I gave a talk a few years ago in New York
in the city and I told this story because I tell it often, and someone came up to me
after and said I still work at that facility where you did that summer training and Marlon
was still there and he knew exactly who I was talking about.
So I had not reconnected but it occurs to me that I should go back and follow up on
that connection.
Yeah that would be a very interesting, even a case study.
Well he changed my life, and in some ways changed the lives of so many other people
just through the work that we've been able to do over the years.
It's 10s of thousands of people like Marlon that I have interacted with over the years,
so it's pretty impressive he had that influence.
Well what you've done with CARD and everything else has been an inspiration to people like
me because I'm still amazed that so many of these parents just feel like the lone ranger
and they're just like what do I do where do I turn, who do I go to and you provide that.
We try to.
I mean CARD still for many people is a great mystery.
Often people come up to me and say I still don't know what CARD does and my answer is
always: well that's because we do everything essentially.
We take care of the families who need support when they have a child who was just diagnosed
and we follow them through out their lives providing whatever support and assistance
they need at any point in their life cycle.
So from parent training to school based consultations to public education and awareness campaigns
to case management from the time of diagnosis all the way through the entire life span of
the individual.
So we kind of do so many unique and individual things for families that it's hard to sometimes
in the elevator speech tell people exactly what CARD because it's all things to so many
different people.
And now you're chairing the big global impact conference they're having at the Ells foundation.
Tell our audience about that, what that is and what's going to be going on there.
That's great, I'm really excited about this event, as I think people have started to hear
about Ernie Ells, very famous professional golfer and his wife have been working tirelessly
over the last 5, 6 years to create this amazing institution, educational institution, outreach,
global impact institution in Jupiter, but with tentacles into South Africa and also
into Canada and other places around the world.
And they are now launching their very first annually conference and I'm the proud chair
person of the event and what we though we would do with this conference is try to high
light what are the core principles of the Ells center and the Ells Foundation and that
is it's global, it's intending to have an impact on society and people with disabilities
and we are hopeful that it will represent the innovative educational technologies that
are available in the school as well.
So know global, impactful, innovative to be about science to bring the best of the best,
the state of the art researchers and clinicians and policy people to South Florida and we've
done that and we've also called on quite a few of our friends.
So this was one of those, if I'm going to chair it and this is going to be the first
one, not only do I want the best but I want the best to also be the nicest people in the
field and we've got them all and it's really going to be special.
And that's going to be April 28th and 29th up in Jupiter.
It's going to be a really remarkable event, it's a two day event along with a VIP dinner
where people can sit and casually chat with these researchers, really the thought leaders
in the field of autism.
People like Ami Clin and Cathy Lord and Roberto Tuchman, Richard Glinker, and so many amazing
people who have done this remarkable work either clinically or scientifically in the
autism world for so many years.
I hope people come and I hope people appreciate how special this is for Florida.
Now as one of the leaders in Autism, how do you approach getting everyone to play nicely
in the sandbox together?
That's a great question.
Well I'm not sure I know the answer to that, I think I have made my mistakes over the years
when I was younger.
I thought the things that I were doing were more important than what other people were
doing so I understand the journey that agencies go on and that professionals go on and it's
so easy to make the mistake in thinking that you're something different than just part
of a bigger puzzle.
And I think I've learned that lesson really well and I think the Autism community has
struggled historically in terms of everyone being on the same page and everyone being
on the same path but I think things have gotten considerably better, I think the last decade
or so we've seen agencies come together, we've seen people start to come together collaboratively
even some of the large national institutions that work locally now are a little bit more
engaged with the local community where as in the past it was very difficult for the
local community to benefit from some of the larger national institutions working on initiatives
related to Autism.
So I think we're doing better.
I think there is always room for growth.
At the end of the day, what I've learned over the last 20 years since I've been here in
South Florida is that it's always got to be about the client.
It's always got to be at the end of the day about the person who is living with Autism
or with any disability and the family that surrounds them.
If you lose focus on that then you really lost the plot completely.
Our role as professionals is to facilitate what the individuals with Autism and related
disabilities want for themselves and want for the community in which they live.
If we get in the way of that then we haven't done anyone any good.
So we really need to listen more.
We do a lot of talking, those of us who are professionals and I think sometimes we need
to step back, silence ourselves and really listen.
And not just listen to words but listen to actions and movements and behavior.
Listen carefully to what the community is telling us that it needs.
And by a community I mean people who actually are affected by the conditions that we're
supposedly trying to support in some way.
Here at Different Brains, the way what I'm seeing is that there are so many similar things
for things that help Alzheimer's, autism, and strokes, and traumatic brain injury, and
schizophrenia and they're all different but there are areas of commonality.
At Different Brains we're bringing everything under one big tent and trying to highlight
all the great work that each silo is doing.
How do you see Autism in that spectrum based upon your years of research and clinical and
everything you've been doing?
Well I think at the end of the day people are people and labels don't necessarily help
describe no only who they are but also what they need so I think it's important that we
really just look at the individual and I think the other thing I wanted to say related to
this is for years I think the Autism community has been so closed off in some ways from the
broader disability community and I think that's been a huge tactical error, I think the broader
disability community has tremendously more strength when they're operating in sync when
they're operating on really global impactful initiatives that affect all people regardless
of the specific disability that they have.
So I think Autism is so vast and so varied in itself that I'm not even sure what it is
anymore as an entity as a diagnostic structure.
I think in some ways people who have that label are very similar to people with anxiety
disorders, ADHD, mood disorders, schizophrenia, you name any label that's out there; there's
similarities that they share.
I remember reading a paper years ago about the big three.
Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and autism and just the interconnections of every other
condition that existed.
I think that's really important conceptualization that we apply these labels to characteristics
that kind of are joined together in some kind of what seems to be a meaningful way.
But at the end of the day we're just human beings who have different traits and some
of those traits are functional and some of those traits at certain times are not adaptive
and functional.
It just helps to look at people as people with particular characteristics, some that
need support and some that are relative assets.
So I'm not sure that I'm answering your question.
No you answered it very well.
I think it's just that we get so lost in trying to identify ourselves as being part of a group
and part of a movement or part of a category and I think we've lost a lot of opportunities
to create real meaningful societal change.
I love what you're doing because it's not about a label.
It's about just appreciating that people are different in terms of their neurological
profiles.
Skills, assets, deficits, whatever; we're all unique individuals that have something
to offer and also something to gain from interactions with other people and I think until we get
to the point to where we just understand we're all uniquely capable of learning something
from someone but also teaching something to someone.
We're just going to continue to lag behind in terms of just bigger policy initiatives
that need to happen to make the world a fully inclusive place for all people.
When I was writing the Aspertools book, Dr. Lori Butts took me to task in a fond way saying,
"you know, Hackie you're writing this Aspertools and you think it's about Asperger's and
autism, it's about relationships it's about all of us because we all have these commonalities
and all of us have different varying traits and degrees and so forth."
Listen as a scientist I guess, I don't really call myself that, but as an academic certainly
I understand the need for labels to just put simply the need for categories and classifications
particularly within the systems we work with whether it be insurance or education or healthcare,
you need certain systems to enable you to do certain kinds of work.
But at the same time you know there are lost opportunities to create stronger interactions
among the groups to create change.
We continue to lose that, and I don't know we have figured out the solution yet to get
past that.
I remember sitting in a session I was doing it was actually something sponsored by the
legislators in Florida and we all went to Orlando and there were different panels and
different professionals and I remember sitting there and being designated the autism expert.
We were talking about broad issues: how Florida could make a more significant change that
could support people with all disabilities, this is really the wrong approach, I shouldn't
be here as the Autism expert, this goes beyond Autism and understanding people who are different
with specific needs and interests and talents and functional deficits in some ways.
We're missing the point by having an autism expert and a down syndrome expert and an ADHD
expert.
I don't even want to be considered an Autism expert, I just want to be considered a person
who has had a career who has hopefully helped some people along the way and hopefully has
something to contribute beyond the niche area that is attached to me.
Tell me how you mold together, how did it come to be that the CARD--Center for Autism
Related Disabilities--involves University of Miami and Nova Southeastern University,
I knew Marlene Sutella when she was at NOVA.
I actually just had a call with her and I'm going to be with her at this event I'm going
to tonight.
She's terrific.
She's the best and she and I work together for many years.
She makes great music.
She's a great musician and a great person.
Totally dedicated human being to life and career and the people she serves.
But to answer your question, I came to CARD, I was recruited in 1996 to come and participate
in the university of Miami's efforts to build a new center that they just got funding from
the state for.
So I came in 96.
My original plan was to come for 1 year, I was only going to work 80% time and then go
back to my tenure track job in California.
But after one year it was clear that I needed to stay and that there was work to be done.
It was a very tamulputious year, I will confess.
Not everyone loved the young know it all doctor from California and New York before that.
You had it all going on.
I learned to soften my approach to change because sometimes systems don't move because
you want them to, they move because you kind of caress them a little bit and encourage
them to move over the course of several years.
But I think what happened was we really saw the opportunity to create among all the CARD
centers in the state of Florida.
But at the time, University of Miami was the only private institution as part of that network;
all the other institutions were public.
We really though there was an opportunity to join UM and Nova in a stronger union in
terms of the South Florida CARD center.
UM, Nova, both private institutions, Nova had already been leading the way with the
Bodwin school and Maleman Seagle Institute and great people like Sue Cabbot and others
who were there long before the CARD centers were started.
In fact Sue, among other people was one of the reasons why there is CARD centers in the
state of Florida.
So we just saw an opportunity to connect to the Universities and make our south Florida
program even stronger.
In fact it's probably one of the strongest if not the only strong union between these
two private universities and we're really proud of that.
You should be because that may be one of Michael's greatest accomplishments because, God bless
these universities but there is a lot of politics involved.
It's not easy to navigate the politics of any institution but universities are particularly
tricky.
Even just the systems and procedures and the way business operates.
It's not easy to get sometimes even the easiest thing done but we've done really well for
a long time and it's one of the longest standing partnerships I've ever known.
Speaking for myself it's been very hard for me to get the gut brain people to talk to
the genetics people to talk to the vaccine people to talk to the environmental people
because everyone thinks it's a zero some game and their thing is what causes everything
instead of being multifactorial like everything else in life.
Well I think it's like what you said it's a zero some game.
People are very focused on funding to support their particular area of research and their
particular interests in studies.
So you don't get as much interdisciplinary work as you would like in the world of Autism.
There have been efforts to overcome that I will say that, I remember many years ago before
Autism Speaks there was a group called NAR, National Alliance for Autism Research.
I actually chaired their scientific affairs committee.
I wasn't the scientific expert but was the lay person who over saw the committee and
I remember several initiatives they pushed for then which were trying to get people from
outside the Autism world but had interest in immunology and some of the other things
that you mentioned to come into the Autism world and beyond that and start to work with
other people across disciplines to answer these big questions that can't be answered
in one discipline alone.
Psychology doesn't have the answer, just looking at the brain neurological functioning is not
going to be the answer, looking at the gut alone is not going to be the answer, genetics
we know didn't pan out, for years we were looking for the autism gene and we now know
there is no autism gene.
There are many genes that are implicated in Autism but not alone, not with out environmental
factors.
So I think we've certainly, at least in the course of my career have moved dramatically
from kind of looking for single explanations and kind of looking at multi disciplinary
explanations and I still think there is a resistance to certain ideas about certain
cause and potentials.
I don't know enough about the biological aspects of the research to speak to that but I think
in general we tend to be very arrogant as scientists, as researchers, as professionals,
we think our thing is the thing.
Well you also, the way we're set up is grant wise lets say and I was saying this out when
I was speaking at the Aspen Institute, you just heard a great talk from one university
that showed you the tests and showed how the brains were rewiring in Alzheimer's patients
with a plant based, meditterean style diet.
And you're going to hear later the same findings in an Autism grant study.
They're great studies but exercise, proper diet and nutrition, these kinds of things
they help every brain and not only your brain, your heart and everything else so on and so
forth.
That gets into the commonality that I'm seeing in everything that's good for your brain is
also good for your body, good for your heart, good for your mental status, good for everything.
There is this grant; I call it the grant syndrome, where you don't want to give up your piece
of the pie by sharing.
Well I think the system the way it's structured doesn't lead to the kind of creativity and
innovation across disciplinary work that maybe most of us would like, I think it's a very
fixed kind of system and I think people are sometimes reluctant to purpose too much innovative
work because it complicates the design, it complicates the feasibility and I think people
who are writing grants are very concerned that whatever they submit to an agency for
review should be as streamlined as possible so it's clear the question their asking and
the answer they're going to get or the methods they're going to use.
I think creativity is not generally rewarded in science.
What an oxymoron.
Well to the extent that I understand it, I'm not primarily a researcher but it's been from
my observation on the committee that I mentioned to you but also just existing in the scientific
world for so long that we have a tendency to do one thing and we have a tendency to
do it over and over again in very different ways but we don't really have a natural tendency
to reach beyond our expertise to try to bring in other ideas and freshness to the work that
we're doing.
I think the system limits that, I don't think it's any mal intent part of researchers I
think there are just some real restrictions in the academic world on innovation and creativity
and on exploring something, truly exploring something that you don't have an idea about,
about what it will mean or if it will work or not.
Those days are really behind us I think.
We kind of have to hope for things that people just discover naturally, that we then can
pursue with some kind of confidence.
The people who want to find out more about the Ells for Autism and this great Autism
Innovations and Global Impact Conference, they can go to the website, and how else can
they find out more about you and what you're doing and the Ells Foundation.
Well anyone is free to contact me at umcard.org that's the easiest way to get ahold of me.
Find my picture and click on my face and you'll get an email to me very effectively and efficiently.
And for the Ells Foundation is anyone just wants to Google global impact and autism innovations
that would be fantastic and you'd be able to find it there.
Michael thank you so much for being here at Different Brains.
We're going to continue this conversation next time and thank you so much and keep up
the great work you're doing at the CARD, the center of autism related disabilities at the
University of Miami and Nova Southeastern, and also the upcoming Autism Innovations and
Global Impact Conference hosted by the Ells for Autism, thank you so much.
Thanks for having me.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét