Thứ Hai, 10 tháng 4, 2017

Waching daily Apr 11 2017

YOUR BREATH IS YOUR BRAIN�S REMOTE CONTROL, NEW STUDY SAYS

For centuries, yogis have been expressing the incredible benefits meditation can provide.

More recently, meditation has become a more mainstream means of treating anxiety and stress,

as deep breathing has been proven to calm the nervous system and reduce our heart rate.

Avid meditators or individuals who practice breathing techniques typically report that

such practices have the ability to silence or slow down the mind. This begs the question:

How exactly does meditation and controlled breathing affect our brain?

We�ve all heard the saying �take a deep breath,� and there�s actually some merit

to that. A new study published in the Journal of Neuroscience found that there�s a direct

link between nasal breathing and our cognitive function.

The Link Between Our Breath and Our Brain

While practicing yoga, you typically breathe through your nose, but why is that? I find

breathing through the nose to be less strenuous and more peaceful, especially while practicing

yoga. Well, Northwestern Medicine scientists may have just found an explanation for that.

The scientists began by testing the electrical brain signals of seven epilepsy patients with

electrodes in their brains. Their findings showed that the rhythms of the participants�

natural breathing matched the slow electrical rhythms in their brain regions associated

with their sense of smell.

The scientists also noted that during nasal inhalation, the fast electrical rhythms in

the amygdala, responsible for our ability to process emotions, and the hippocampus,

associated with memories and emotions, became stronger.

To gain a better understanding of their research, the scientists then examined an additional

60 healthy participants to discover the effects nasal breathing has on memory and emotional

behaviour. The participants were shown both scared and surprised faces, and then they

had to immediately determine the emotional expression of the face they just saw. As it

turned out, the participants were able to identify the scared faces much faster when

they were inhaling through the nose than when they were shown the images when exhaling or

when breathing through the mouth.

The scientists also tested the participants by showing them images and then asking them

to recall them later. The participants were much better at recalling the original images

if they were shown them on an inhale breath through the nose.

The study�s findings suggest that the act of nasal breathing plays an integral role

in coordinationg electrical brain signals in the olfactory �smell� cortex, the brain

regions that receive input from our nose. It�s clear that the act of breathing through

the nose, even when we don�t smell anything, can still affect our emotions and memory.

This is fascinating because we often associate smell with memory and emotion. However, this

information proves that it�s not just the sense of smell that can remind us of a particular

day or moment in our lives, but also the simple act of breathing though the nose itself.

Nasal breathing can therefore be considered �the remote control of the brain,� because

breathing through the nose directly affects the electrical signals in the smell regions

of the brain. By controlling our breath, we can actually improve brain function in order

to develop more accurate and quicker emotional recognition abilities and improve our memory

simultaneously.

Keep in mind that just because the inhalation is what�s associated with cognitive function,

that doesn�t mean that the exhalation isn�t equally as important! Studies have shown that

controlled breathing, which often means slow inhales and exhales, and meditation can have

incredibly beneficial effects on human health.

This isn�t the first study to prove the effects controlled breathing can have on the

brain. A study conducted by Harvard researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) determined

that meditation literally rebuilds the brain�s grey matter, which is associated with memory,

sense of self, empathy, and stress. Participants practiced, on average, 27 minutes of mindfulness

exercises daily and experienced significant improvements after only two months. This is

one of the first studies to prove that meditation can actually change the brain.

Other Health Benefits of Controlled Breathing and the Relaxation Response

The Relaxation Response is basically the opposite of the �fight or flight� response and

can be described as a deep relaxation that engages the parasympathetic nervous system,

otherwise known as meditation. You can also induce the Relaxation Response through controlled

breathing, yoga, and other mindfulness practices.

According to Herbert Benson, M.D., of Harvard Medical School, the Relaxation Response can

counteract the physiological changes of stress and the fight or flight response, including

muscle tension, headache, upset stomach, racing heartbeat, and shallow breathing.

A Harvard study found that meditation and the Relaxation Response can mitigate symptoms

of Irritable Bowl Syndrome (IBS) and improve gut health. The study showed that by inducing

the Relaxation Response, participants showed reduced symptoms of IBS as well as decreased

anxiety and overall better quality of life.

Another study performed at the Chopra Center for Wellbeing compared a group of meditators

to a group of non-meditators and found that meditating can have long-term benefits, including

improved mental health and cellular health.

Another study showed that meditation and controlled breathing can protect and lengthen telomeres,

which are located on the ends of chromosomes. If your chromosomes are healthy, your cells

are healthy as well, further proving that meditation can aid cellular health.

In addition to physiological changes, meditation can also provoke emotional and psychological

changes as well. This study proved that experienced meditators produce increased levels of melatonin.

The meditators were studied after participating in either Transcendental Meditation-Sidhi

or yoga, both of which were found to help increase melatonin.

Lastly, according to Ellen L. Idler, Ph.D., a professor at Emory College, those who practice

spiritual modalities including meditation are more likely to make positive and healthy

choices. Idler goes on to explain that through meditation, we can decrease chronic stress

and the potential for disease.

For more infomation >> YOUR BREATH IS YOUR BRAIN'S REMOTE CONTROL, NEW STUDY SAYS - Duration: 7:31.

-------------------------------------------

Can you guess who our 'typical' Aussie is? - Duration: 1:15.

- [Narrator] The Census took a snapshot of Australia.

What a diverse nation we are.

We met lots of different Australians who are

anything but 'typical'.

You'll find out more when Census data is released in June.

In the meantime, here's what we found out

about our 'typical' Aussie.

Our 'typical' Aussie lives in a home with two vehicles.

Jess here prefers to ride a bike.

(bicycle bell)

Australians 'typically' live in a three bedroom home

that is owned with a mortgage.

Whereas Byron here lives in a rented studio by the beach.

Our 'typical' Aussie is married and a parent

to two adorable children.

Phew.

Lots of Aussies were born overseas

like Patty and Myuki.

But our 'typical' Aussie was born here.

Our 'typical' Aussie's parents are born in Australia

and have English ancestry.

Wow, we've met so many Australians

from all walks of life.

So what does our 'typical' Aussie look like?

Meet one of our 'typical' Aussies.

Let's call her Claire.

She's 38, married with two kids,

lives in a home that has three bedrooms,

owned with a mortgage, and has two vehicles.

She's just one of our 'typical' Aussies.

But there's nothing 'typical' about Australians.

The wait's almost over Australia.

Find out more on 27 June 2017.

For more infomation >> Can you guess who our 'typical' Aussie is? - Duration: 1:15.

-------------------------------------------

Cops: Smashing Your Face Into Pavement Is "Standard Arrest Technique" (VIDEO) - Duration: 5:01.

WE HAVE SOME DISTURBING FOOTAGE FOR YOU.

THIS IS CELL

PHONE VIDEO OF A 22-YEAR-OLD COLLEGE STUDENT NAMED MICHAELA

SURRATT BEING DEVASTATED, BRUTALIZED BY POLICE IN COLORADO

SPRINGS, I BELIEVE THIS IS EARLIER THIS WEEK.

TAKE A LOOK.

OH, I GOT THAT ON TAPE!

THAT VIDEO WAS MADE AVAILABLE BY BARSTOOL SPORTS, SOMEONE

WITNESSING AN ONGOING ALTERCATION BETWEEN THAT WOMAN

AND HER BOYFRIEND AND THE POLICE AND A BOUNCER -- MANY PEOPLE,

EITHER THE VIDEOTAPER FOR THE PEOPLE AROUND, LAUGHING.

NOT A

LAUGHING MATTER, THAT IS ABOUT AS SERIOUS AND ACT AS YOU CAN

TAKE, THE POLICE WILL SAY THAT YOU DON'T SEE THE CONTEXT, YOU

DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED BEFORE THE VIDEO, BUT WE ALSO WOULDN'T

HAVE SEEN ANYTHING IF NOT FOR THAT VIDEO.

WE KNOW HOW THOSE

SITUATIONS NORMALLY GO WHEN SOMEONE DOES NOT TAKE THEIR CELL

PHONE OUT, POLICE SAY SHE WAS BEING RESISTANT -- NO ONE WOULD

BELIEVE HOW DEVASTATING THAT BODY SLAM IS, BUT YOU SAW IT,

THERE IS NO ACCUSED FOR THAT.

SHE DIDN'T HAVE A MACHINE GUN IN

HER HAND.

I WOULDN'T DO THAT TO MY WORST ENEMY.

SHE WAS ALLEGEDLY ATTEMPTING TO BREAK UP A FIGHT BETWEEN HER

BOYFRIEND AND SOME OTHER GUY, AND APPARENTLY THAT IS WHEN COPS

GOT INVOLVED, COPS SAY THEY TOLD HER SHE COULD LEAVE AT THAT

MOMENT BUT SHE DIDN'T WANT TO LEAVE, AND I WILL BE HONEST, IF

I WERE IN THAT SITUATION AND HER SHOES AND I EXPERIENCED MY

SIGNIFICANT OTHER IN SOME SORT OF PHYSICAL ALTERCATION, I'M NOT

GOING TO LEAVE.

I'M GOING TO STAY AND MAKE SURE HE'S OKAY.

I

DON'T BLAME HER FOR NOT LEAVING.

THE COPS ARE RIGHT, WE DON'T SEE

TOO MUCH OF WHAT HAPPENED PRIOR TO THE VIDEO --

THEY SAY SHE SHOULDER CHECKED A BOUNCER.

OH, DID SHE SHOULDER CHECKED THE COP?

AND WAS THE COP FACING

AN IMMINENT THREAT TO THE POINT WHERE HE HAD TO SLAM HER TO THE

FLOOR?

IS HER SHOULDER CHECKING IMMINENT THREAT TO YOUR LIFE?

NO, SHE'S A VERY THIN YOUNG WOMAN, AND EVEN IN THAT

SITUATION WITH THE COP WHERE THERE IS A LITTLE

BACK-AND-FORTH, THE COP ISN'T EVEN REALLY STRUGGLING WITH HER,

THAT'S THE AMAZING PART.

HE LOST HIS TEMPER REAL QUICK.

I'M

FURIOUS AT WHOEVER IS IN THE BACKGROUND LAUGHING AT IT AS IF

IT'S SOME ENTERTAINMENT FOR THAT PERSON.

THAT IS A HUMAN BEING

WHO COULD HAVE REALLY GOTTEN SERIOUSLY AND PERMANENTLY HURT

AS A RESULT OF THAT, AND I'M ALSO ANGRY AT THE WAY THE COP

HANDLE IT.

I CAN'T EVEN WATCH IT TO BE HONEST WITH YOU --

IT'S BRUTAL.

I CAN'T WATCH IT ANYMORE.

BUT EVERY TIME I LOOK AT IT, I'M

LIKE, WHAT MADE THAT COP THINK THAT THAT NEEDED TO BE THE END

RESULT?

IF SHE'S BEING DIFFICULT --

APPARENTLY THAT IS THE CULTURE.

THAT COULD'VE BEEN HANDLED SO ANY OTHER WAYS, HE COULD HAVE

RESTRAINED HER IN SO MANY OTHER WAYS.

I'M SO HAPPY SHE'S NOT

PARALYZED FROM MAYBE BREAKING HER NECK --

SHE COULD HAVE DIED FROM THAT.

EXACTLY.

WE HAVE A STATEMENT FROM THE FORT COLLINS POLICE CHIEF --

BLAH BLAH -- THAT IS TRUE, WE MIGHT DISAGREE FROM TIME TO

TIME, I THINK EVERY HUMAN BEING ON EARTH CAN AGREE THERE IS NO

WAY THAT THAT'S APPROPRIATE.

IF SHE HAD JUST WHISPERED INTO HIS

EAR I AM A CHEMICAL BOMB ABOUT TO EXPLODE, OKAY, SLAM HER.

ASIDE FROM THAT, ANYTHING IN THE BOUNDS OF REALITY, THAT WAS NOT

APPROPRIATE.

HE ALSO SAID THIS -- THEY HAVE BODY CAMERAS,

APPARENTLY, YOU CAN GET MORE CONTEXT, BUT THE CHIEF SAID --

THEN SPARE US THE YOU GUYS DON'T HAVE ALL THE CONTEXT, YOU

HAVEN'T SEEN EVERYTHING.

IF YOU HAVE THE VIDEO AND YOU COULD

SHOW IT TO US AND IT MAKES YOUR COP LOOK BETTER AS A RESULT, THE

FACT YOU ARE HIDING IT SEEMS A LITTLE SUSPICIOUS AT THIS POINT.

AND THAT'S A QUICK REMINDER THAT WHILE I THINK THE SPREAD OF BODY

CAMERAS IS A GOOD THING AND IT WILL LEAD TO SLIGHTLY MORE

JUSTICE, IT IS BY NO MEANS A SOLUTION TO ALL THE PROBLEMS WE

HAVE WITH POLICE, ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THE POLICE ALL TOO

OFTEN EITHER DON'T RELEASE THE FOOTAGE OR THE CAMERAS

ACCIDENTALLY TURN OFF OR IT BREAKS, APPARENTLY IF IT JOSTLES

IT BREAKS EASILY.

BUT THAT WAS UNCONSCIONABLE, WHAT HAPPENED

TO THAT WOMAN.

For more infomation >> Cops: Smashing Your Face Into Pavement Is "Standard Arrest Technique" (VIDEO) - Duration: 5:01.

-------------------------------------------

Teen is first to test artificial pancreas - Duration: 1:58.

SHE'S ONE OF THE FIRST IN THE

COUNTRY TO RECEIVE A SO-CALLED

ARTIFICIAL PANCREAS.

THIS NEW TECHNOLOGY COULD CHANGE

THE LIVES OF TENS OF THOUSANDS

WHO HAVE TYPE 1 DIABETES.

CBS' KENNETH CRAIG HAS TONIGHT'S

STORY FOR YOUR WELL BEING.

(TRACK-1) CLAIRE BICKEL SUFFERS

FROM TYPE 1 DIABETES AND KEEPING

HER BLOOD SUGAR IN CHECK IS A

CONSTANT

STRUGGLE.

(SOT - CLAIRE BICKEL, HAS TYPE-1

DIABETES ) ESPECIALLY WHEN I'M

JUGGLING FIELD

HOCKEY, THE SPRING MUSICAL,

TRACK, BIOLOGY, CHECKING MY

BLOOD

SUGAR (TRACK-2) BUT NOW, THE

ACTIVE 14 YEAR OLD SAYS THIS

SMALL DEVICE IS GOING TO

SIMPLIFY HER LIFE DRAMATICALLY.

SHE'S ONE OF THE FIRST PATIENTS

IN

THE COUNTRY AND THE FIRST

PEDIATRIC PATIENT -- TO RECEIVE

THE SO

CALLED ARTIFICIAL PANCREAS SINCE

IT WAS FDA APPROVED LAST YEAR.

THE SYSTEM FROM MEDTRONIC -

AUTOMATICALLY MEASURES HER

BLOOD SUGAR AND DELIVERS

PERSONALIZED AMOUNTS OF

INSULIN 24 HOURS A DAYWITH

LESS INTERACTION FROM CLAIRE.

DOCTOR STUART WEINZIMER AT YALE

CHILDREN'S DIABETES PROGRAM

SAYS REDUCING THE BURDEN TO

PATIENTS AND FAMILIES IS HUGE.

(SOT - DR.

STUART ALAN WEINZIMER/YALE

CHILDREN'S

DIABETES PROGRAM) YOU STILL HAVE

TO DO SOME BASIC

THINGS LIKE TESTING YOUR BLOOD

SUGAR //DOSING WHAT YOU

ARE EATING.

THIS IS GOING TO OPERATE AND DO

A LOT OF THE IMPORTANT

SAFETY WORK IN BETWEEN MEALS,

DURING EXERCISE AD AT NIGHT

(TRACK-3) THOSE ARE THE TIMES

CLAIRE'S

MOTHER WOULD WORRY ABOUT BLOOD

SUGAR DROPPING THE

MOST.

(SOT - KENNETH AND FRANCESCA

BICKEL,

CLAIRE'S MOTHER) KENNETH: AND

WHAT DOES THAT DO FOR

YOUR WORRY LEVEL? FRANCESCA: OH,

IT BRINGS IT DOWN I SLEPT ALL

NIGHT LAST NIGHT.

(TRACK-4)

CLARIE'S NOW LOOKING FORWARD TO

A FUTURE WITH LESS STRESS.

(SOT - CLAIR) I THINK GOING

AWAY PLACES, GOING TO

COLLEGE /// A LOT OF THOSE

THINGS I WANT TO DO BY MYSELF,

IT'S JUST A

LOT EASIER TO DO.

(TRACK-5)

..

GIVING BOTH HER AND HER MOTHER

PEACE OF MIND...

AND ANOTHER

REASON TO SMILE.

(NATS: ...

MOM AND DAUGHTER

LAUGHING) (TRACK-6) KENNETH

CRAIG, CBS NEWS, NEW HAVEN

CONNECTICUT

1.25-MILLION AMERICANS ARE

CURRENTLY LIVING WITH TYPE 1

DIABETES.

SOME RAIN AND STORMS IN THE AREA

For more infomation >> Teen is first to test artificial pancreas - Duration: 1:58.

-------------------------------------------

The Great War Panel Discussion - Duration: 1:00:24.

Dean Borg: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.

I'm Dean Borg and we have just seen a preview of The

Great War, which will be airing on PBS nationwide

and on Iowa Public Television on Monday,

Tuesday and Wednesday of this coming week from 8 to

10 o'clock each night.

And now we're convening a panel of Iowans who aren't

from World War I, of course, but these are

people who can give us a perspective of how World

War I set the stage, if you will, for America's

involvement in other wars.

And we're going to be contrasting what they

experienced in World War II, Vietnam, Afghanistan

and then we have a historian here who has

studied World War I and is going to give us a

perspective of what he has been able to glean in

history and set the perspective for us.

And that person is down on the far end of our panel.

He's Mike Vogt.

He is Curator of the Gold Star Military Museum at

out Camp Dodge in Johnston, Iowa.

He is from Gladbrook.

Mike, as just a brief summary here, when did you

first start getting interested in World War I?

And give us a little bit about how extensive is

your research?

Mike Vogt: I've had an interest in the First

World War, my grandfather was a World War I veteran,

but before anyone draws any conclusions he fought

for the other side.

He was a German soldier and immigrated here in

1921.

So word of mouth from my father and grandmother I

heard anecdotes about his experience and so that got

me interested somewhat early on, also intrigued

by an anecdote that was shared in a history class

at UNI that Merle Hay was one of the first three

Americans and the first Iowan to die in World War

I.

So off and on I have studied and revisited that

topic.

Borg: You mentioned a name there that when you said

Merle Hay, I think of that as a place where I exit

Interstate 80.

So Merle Hay Road is named for -- Vogt: Merle David

Hay, who was a 20 year old and enlisted in the Army

in May of 1917 from Glidden, Iowa and came to

Camp Dodge to take his army physical, was worried

about flat feet, that that would prevent him from

serving Uncle Sam, he passed his medical

physical, was assigned to the First Division, was

among the first units sent to France in support of

the allies in World War I and in November of 1917

that would cost his life in a trench raid.

Borg: And I'm going to show you just how flexible

we are.

I was sitting in the lobby of Iowa Public Television

just before convening this panel about three hours

ago sitting there and a gentleman walked in, he's

the next one here in line on our panel, his name is

Richard Peterson.

He brought in some albums and then he started

talking with me and I find out that here Richard

Peterson is a World War II veteran and

serendipitously he was born in 1917.

So on August 10th of this year, Richard Peterson

will be 100 years old.

(applause)

Borg: I asked at that point when I

realized what I had, if I'm not anything else I'm

a person who jumps on resources, and Richard

Peterson I recognized right away would make a

great addition to our panel so we quickly added

a chair and that is why Richard Peterson is here.

Richard, you're from Johnston, Iowa.

Richard Peterson: I'm from Johnston.

Borg: And of course you don't remember anything,

you were born in 1917 and World War I was just

underway at the time of your birth, but you did

enter World War II.

But you must have heard as you were growing up and

have some of the legacy of World War I from maybe

parents.

What did you know about World War I, just in a

sentence or two, what impressed you about what

you heard about World War I?

Peterson: What I heard about World War I was from

the American Legion members in this small town

where I eventually lived my life.

Borg: The American Legion.

Peterson: The American Legion because they were prominent in

that little town. And one of the things that they did was

attend the social club meetings that the school had for the

community where they got together and they sang songs

and they listened to programs and they listened to the

programs that the school could provide like music groups

and so on. So one of the first things I heard there that

reminded me of World War II was a song that went in such a

way, Today is Monday, today is Tuesday, Wednesday and

Thursday and at the end of it, all you German mothers

we wish the same to you. But it was a --

Borg: So was that a friendly song then?

Peterson: Oh yes, it was a friendly song, there

wasn't anything derogatory about it at all.

But they were, the soldiers were leading the

community singing and that was one of the things they

seemed to enjoy singing was, Today is Monday, all

you German mothers, we wish the same to you.

Borg: Thank you.

Thank you for the solo too.

The next person here I also met serendipitously

and he has been a great resource for Iowa Public

Television in the time since.

But Roger Beau I first met, I was sitting waiting

for a concert to begin and Roger was seated next to

me.

We got into a conversation and I found out he's a

Vietnam War veteran from Vinton, Iowa and Roger, at

that time I realized that you also had some unique

experiences and we'll get into those.

But right now you live in eastern Iowa now.

Roger Beau: Yes I do.

And I'd like to give my viewpoint on World War I.

As a young boy, my parents would take me out to my

great-grand uncle's and he was a World War I veteran

and we would go there and I think it was Declaration

Day when they would decorate, this was a

holiday that preceded our Memorial Day, but he would

often times have a fellow soldier who was exposed to

mustard gas and he was very deformed from that

and as a young boy it scared me to be around

him.

But that was my introduction to World War

I.

Borg: Did that also, one more question then, did

that also form your opinion of the horrors of

war as a young man experiencing that tale and

seeing this maybe grotesque person?

Beau: Yes, that and conversations with my

father who fought in World War II.

Borg: Next in our panel here is a person who has

experienced the medical side of it.

Heather Dillwood is from Des Moines.

What war are you experienced in?

Heather Dillwood: Afghanistan.

Borg: How many tours?

Dillwood: Just one.

Borg: And how long in Afghanistan?

Dillwood: I was ten months in Afghanistan.

Borg: And what role?

I said the medical side of it.

In what role?

Dillwood: I was a combat medic in Afghanistan from

August of 2010 to June of 2011.

Borg: Some experiences that we'll get to a bit

later.

I've not quizzed you about those experiences but you

must have had some.

Dillwood: Oh yeah, absolutely, absolutely.

Borg: I'm looking forward to it.

Caesar Smith is right here on my right hand side.

Caesar, you're from Des Moines.

What war are you experienced in?

Caesar Smith: Vietnam War I was in, experienced in

I'm not sure exactly how much experience you meant,

but I did know many of those in World War II that

were in my neighborhood, black soldiers and sailors

that came back from World War II.

And so that everybody doesn't think I'm the only

one up here freezing and shaking, I've got

Parkinson's so I'll be shaking all over the

place.

Borg: Let me just delve into that just a bit more.

Did you spend time on the ground?

I think do I remember right that you're Air

Force?

Smith: I was airborne, 82nd Airborne Division,

paratrooper in Vietnam.

Borg: Did you do any parachuting into South

Vietnam?

Smith: No, we used helicopters in Vietnam and

landed by helicopter.

And of course we many times were in Agent Orange

areas which caused a lot of diseases, Parkinson's

has been one of them.

But I want to share one thing about World War I

because I don't know if it's going to come up and

it's important to those in Iowa.

The only officer candidate school for African

American officers from World War I was at Fort

Des Moines right here in Des Moines.

And all the officers over in the infantry units were

white and it was a big push to have some black

officers and I won't go through the whole history

of it but they agreed to have an officer candidate

school at Fort Des Moines and black officers did

graduate from that school.

Borg: And that, if I remember right, is your

experience too.

You went into the military as an enlisted person and

then went to what we call OCS or office candidate

school.

Smith: I went in the Army in '56 and went to Officer

Candidate School in '62.

Borg: And then commissioned as a second

lieutenant.

Smith: Out of officer candidate school, yes.

Borg: And then after you left the service at what

rank were you then?

Smith: I was a major when I retired.

I stayed 20 years and 7 days.

(applause)

Borg: That I know you've been in Vietnam because people count the

days who were assigned to Vietnam.

Smith: A lot of soldiers count the days, the

minutes, just going in.

Borg: Let's go back to the historian here.

Mike Vogt, what struck you about your study of World

War I and what happened in World War I?

What is the thing that contrasts most about the

way that perhaps Iowa, you can include the nation

too, but Iowa reacted to the call to duty about

serving in World War I as to what we're experiencing

maybe in the Vietnam War, in the Gulf Wars and in

Afghanistan?

What was the overall support?

How would you draw similarities or contrasts?

Vogt: I think there's a little of both.

The national support for the doughboys that were

mobilized in the First World War are much greater

than we would experience, we wouldn't experience

again until World War II.

Korea, Vietnam, the modern war on terror, Desert

Shield, Desert Storm, the ability for dissent and

disagreement with national policy is in higher relief

in more recent decades than what was tolerated

and what was allowed in the First World War.

So that's an interesting aspect.

It's a different world, dissent is not tolerated

in the First World War as much as it is today.

Borg: The PBS special, The Great War, shows the food

sacrifices that were made by Americans or urged to

make or even compelled to make, shamed to make if I

could put it that way in order to "support the war

effort".

We have evolved to a point where those sacrifices

that we also experienced during World War II and

rationing and things like that, we don't expect that

anymore.

And I think it was Lyndon Baines Johnson who was

justifying the U.S.

participation in South Vietnam who also said, we

can have both butter and guns.

That is a contrast, isn't it?

Is that where things changed about America's

being able to not sacrifice in order to

fight a war and also included in that is the

compulsory draft?

We don't have that anymore.

Vogt: Correct.

I think the, not I think, I'll just state it as a

matter of fact, the extent and the participation of

the United States in the First and the Second World

Wars agriculturally, industrially, in terms of

personnel drafted, 14 million Americans served

in the military in the Second World War, 4

million in the First, the succeeding campaigns, even

though in Vietnam and Korea the American

casualties, the killed number into 52,000,

53,000, the overall sacrifice to American

society or the impact of those conflicts on

American society was very slight compared to the

First and the Second World Wars.

It's something that shows up in the newspapers, it

shows up on the television but it's not affecting the

dinner table or the crops harvested from the field

or the consumption thereof.

Borg: I'd like to have other panelists here weigh

in.

I'm going to call on Heather first of all but

then I'd like to have all of you weigh in on that as

to how you felt about going to war for the

United States of America?

Were you under compulsion?

Were you drafted?

Or did you volunteer?

And then how did you feel about that?

Heather, first of all.

Dillwood: I volunteered.

There was a big uptick as far as the Iowa Guard

sending soldiers so I was taking the lesser of two

evils.

The unit I ended up going with was going to be,

their intention was to be an agribusiness team so I

would go as a medic to support those individuals

that would be speaking with Afghan locals about

their agricultural ways, their practices, things of

that nature.

So I volunteered because I wanted to be part of that

element as opposed to a bigger element.

Borg: Was it altruistic, you wanted to do something

for the good of America?

Dillwood: I just wanted to do my part.

That's all, simple as that.

Borg: Alright.

Roger?

Beau: For my part I volunteered to go in the

Air Force simply because I wanted a choice in the

matter.

The draft was going strong in 1969 when I entered and

there were a lot of bodies coming home and I thought

I'd make a decision that would impact my life.

Borg: Richard?

Peterson: Well, when I attended college at Iowa

State in 1935 I was attracted to the military,

ROTC people, so I got a commission as a second

lieutenant in 1939 and my first military active duty

assignment on August 1st of 1941 was to the 92nd

Engineer Battalion, which was a thousand or more

colored troops.

So there I was as a white officer in a colored

battalion with only the chaplain as a colored

officer in that time.

And so I spent the first two years of my active

duty training, working with colored troops in

different capacities, in different places and

different things.

Borg: Let me just say, contrast, because at that

time, the era that you're speaking about we pretty

much still were a segregated country.

Peterson: Yeah, right.

Right.

And my first active duty, the day after I reported

for duty down at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri we

got in a truck and moved everybody down into

maneuvers into Louisiana and Arkansas during the

days when that part of the country was still pretty

divided.

Borg: Let me explore that just a little bit more

before I bring in Caesar.

Did you at that time feel that was a good assignment

for you?

Did you enjoy that?

Or was that an assignment to people who were

segregated away from the normal and usual military

in the United States Army at that time?

Was it a good assignment?

Peterson: I didn't know what I was getting into

because I was a small town country boy raised on a

farm and so on.

And there I was with all these people and I was

only one of 23 or 24 officers that were

destined to help train them and get them into the

military's way.

Smith: That's how I felt when I joined the Army and

I was among all these white people.

(laughter)

(applause)

Smith: When I enlisted for

the draft, and this in '56, traveling down to

Fort Smith, Arkansas, got my uniform and we all got,

from Fort Smith we were going through Fort Knox,

Kentucky.

There were five black soldiers and the rest were

white and we got on the buses to go Fort Knox.

We stopped in Louisville, Kentucky for dinner.

We all got off the bus and started into the

restaurant.

As soon as we got in the door this black waiter

said, you, you, you and you, pointed at all of us,

said, you've got to follow me.

And we said, what are you talking about, we're going

to eat?

And he said, no, not now, you've got to follow me.

We went through the restaurant, through the

kitchen to the other side where it said colored and

that's where we were supposed to eat.

That same year when I went to the 82nd Airborne

Division, the great movie The Ten Commandments was

showing downtown at the movie theater.

I was in Army uniform, I went down to see the movie

Ten Commandments, I went up to pay and she said,

you have to go around to the side.

I went to the side and it said colored.

I went upstairs where they had an Army blanket

dividing the upstairs so black people sat on one

side and anybody white could sit on the other

side.

I hadn't thought about all that growing up in Iowa,

although there had been some instances in Iowa,

but nothing like that.

And so it might have been tough in the '30s but it

wasn't much better in the '50s and it didn't get

much better in the '60s.

But by the time I retired from the Army in '76

things had changed quite a bit.

But we're still dealing with those kinds of

issues.

And in terms of my serving in the service, my serving

in combat, I was the company commander of a

unit that was totally integrated and I had just

come back up from Florida where my radio man, my

radio guy in Vietnam, we found each other and spent

time together.

But the whole, all service time whether in World War

I or through if you're an African American or a

person of color, you had issues that you had to

constantly deal with.

Borg: And those were issues in addition to that

which every man and woman entering the military has

to learn, that there is a difference in rank and

rank has its privileges and usually when you're

coming in you're not at the rank where you're

going to be giving orders, you're going to be taking

orders.

In addition, you had to cope with discrimination,

if you will, because of your color.

And it wasn't only because of rank, it was because of

color.

Smith: It was more had to do with color than it did

rank.

Borg: Oh yeah, rank didn't even -- but you had to

deal with two things.

Yes, yes.

Heather, you didn't have that problem.

Of course you're Caucasian.

But you fought and you served at a time when the

services are integrated, or are they?

Dillwood: I'd say for the most part yes.

There's still some areas that women aren't

completely welcomed but it's getting there.

But I think we're all capable of doing the same

thing, it just depends on the person.

Borg: Roger, in experience in Vietnam, we're still

talking about racial divides here.

What was your experience in serving in Vietnam as

far as the races?

Beau: During my time we didn't have very many

people that were colored and so it wasn't a problem

that I saw.

In fact, those that were black, they were friends

and they just worked alongside us and I didn't

know there was any issues while I was there.

Borg: I'm just going to go back to the historian just

to wrap up this side of our conversation here and

that is the racial divide within the military.

Did that at all work positively or negatively

in any way?

Vogt: It worked negatively.

If you're told as a soldier that you're not as

good as people with lighter skin that has a

psychological effect on your training.

Borg: Okay, let me stop right there.

Did it, Roger?

Did that have a psychological, I'm sorry,

Caesar, did that have a -- Smith: I look like Roger.

Borg: An effect on you?

Did that affect you, the racial discrimination?

Smith: Oh, well, when you start off being the black

person you learn early in life it's going to affect

you.

As a matter of fact, you start off realizing it's

going to affect you.

There's no time in my life that I didn't know that I

was going to run into people who didn't like me

just because of the color of my skin.

And so that's an issue that is with you from the

time you're born.

Borg: Did that at all affect the way that you

felt about the country for which you were fighting?

Smith: No because I had, growing up I was

fortunate, I was born and grew up in Iowa.

I say I was fortunate because I went to

integrated schools, most of the time there were

fewer blacks than whites.

And in 1954 I went to Boys State, there was 836 of us

I think there, two black and they elected me

governor, so I figured they learned something

right there.

(applause)

Borg: Heather, I said I was going to get

back, I'm going to get back to a lot of you about

your individual experiences, but I told

you, Heather, that I wanted to come back and

talk about your experiences as a combat

medic.

First of all, let's define that.

That's not a nurse and that's not a physician.

What is a combat medic?

Dillwood: Typically they're like an EMT in a

civilian world.

We do the stabilization and the primary care for

individuals.

Depending on where you're located in any kind of

theater you could end up practicing medicine as a

physician or a nurse or a pharmacist because you're

prescribing medication.

And so there's a large -- Borg: There are no, as in

World War I, front lines and trenches now.

So in Afghanistan you didn't experience that.

Did you ever experience fire fight where you were

actually assisting wounded servicemen or women who

had been wounded in battle and you were in danger

yourself?

Dillwood: Yes.

There was convoy that I was on that we had taken

direct fire and so that was just kind of all of us

being hit with RPG's and small arms fire and then

IED's.

But also the base that I was on in Afghanistan was

a very small base but we had a forward surgical

team that we were role one medical facility so that's

where a lot of the people in our region, if there

was infantrymen or anyone really that was involved

in some kind of engagement and they were injured they

would come to our facility and we would stabilize so

we could transport them to a higher echelon of care.

Borg: And that's what I wanted to get at, that was

the way in Afghanistan, and that's the way we do

it now, you were in the business of stabilizing a

wounded serviceperson and getting them to, as you

said, a higher level of care.

That contrasts with the video that we're seeing

about World War I in which wounded and stayed in

place in the trenches in knee deep mud sometimes

and had to be piled upon other dead bodies because

just to keep them out of the mud.

Is that what you have experienced too in your

history research?

Vogt: A number of individuals in the areas

between the trenches would become injured, would be

wounded out there and that is an area that is prone

to sniper fire, machine gun bursts, so often times

wounded soldiers would lay for hours or days before

somebody could get out there at night to drag

them back to safety or they may die in between

the lines out there because nobody can effect

a rescue.

Smith: One thing about the medics, if you're in a

combat situation I think every soldier is confident

that if anything happens to them in terms of being

fired on, the medic is going to be there.

And the difference between the medic and the rifleman

next to him is the medic knows what to do for sure

and will do it.

And more lives are saved in terms of getting them

out by helicopter because the medics did what they

needed to do immediately.

Dillwood: Yeah, that's about accurate.

We should be doing that.

If they're not, it's a bad medic.

(laughter)

Smith: There are no bad medics.

Borg: But, Heather, that means that you've got to

call in a helicopter evacuation in order to get

that wounded person out.

Tell me how that works.

Dillwood: Well, typically speaking it depends on the

role of the medic within the unit.

If you're just one medic within a squad or a team

you would probably have another individual call in

for a medivac because your primary job is to

stabilize or do what you can for your patient.

Obviously if there's many of you, many medical

personnel then we can just call it in and you know

with your grid coordinates and what kind of equipment

you may need.

Borg: And there's a helicopter that comes

almost immediately?

Dillwood: Depending, yes.

Obviously if you're in a hot area and you're under

fire it will be some time before you can be

evacuated.

So it's the medic's responsibility to do what

they can for their patient and keep them alive as

long as possible until medical support, other

airvacs are available.

Smith: It might have been a little different than in

the jungles of Vietnam.

If you had a wounded person, no matter if you

were in a fire fight, the medics would usually try

to get in and land.

And many times they would land while you were under

heavy fire and get out the wounded.

They'd have gunships with them.

The medic on the ground and the medical team

coming in the helicopter you could always depend

on.

Borg: And then the two of you we've changed in that

we now get that wounded serviceperson out of the

combat and even out of the country almost

immediately.

Tell me how that works.

I'll ask you first, Heather, that is where you

said to a higher echelon of care.

Roger, Caesar I should say, you move in here too.

You move in here too.

(laughter)

Borg: I want to get to Roger in a minute.

Smith: I must be getting awful pale.

(laughter)

Borg: Tell me about the higher echelon

of care.

Dillwood: It would depend on the wounds that someone

had had.

Sometimes they would stay in Afghanistan, they would

go to another facility to continue their care and

sometimes even come back to the fight.

It would just depend on the severity of their

wounds.

They could end up, in Afghanistan they could end

up in Bagram, but if they still go beyond that then

they end up in Germany and then sometimes -- Borg:

Landstuhl in Germany and then maybe transferred,

stabilized further there and then back to the

States.

Dillwood: Right.

Borg: And, Caesar, I wanted to contrast that,

not contrast it but that was similar in Vietnam

because we quickly evacuated wounded service

people out of Vietnam, over the poles, back into

generally Andrews Air Force Base in Washington

and then fanned out from there to specialty care.

Smith: It would depend on of course what is going on

in the war in terms of the area you were in.

There were MASH units in Vietnam, there was a major

hospital in Tan Son Nhut Air Base.

I remember coming out of the hospital visiting one

of my soldiers that got wounded and the medivac

had come in and he went out on a gurney, I guess

it was to pick up, and the soldier was laying there

with his arms and legs next to him but he was

still alive and they were taking him to the

hospital.

So the amount of care and the quickness they can get

to you with medivac, in 24 hours you could be back

home if necessary.

Borg: That's right.

That's right.

I myself have met a plane carrying people back into

Andrews and I saw what you are describing here, men

still in combat boots who had been taken off the

battlefield that quickly and back into this

country.

Richard, I'm going to go back to World War II.

We've been talking here about the wounded.

What the wounded who were wounded in battle but were

still able to be saved, what did you experience?

You told me that you experienced in World War

II, you weren't in the initial battle of Omaha

Beach but you were there quickly afterwards.

So you've seen combat.

Peterson: No, I wasn't in a position to see or have

anything to do with the wounded people and how

they were handled.

But I have I think an interesting connection

between World War II and World War I in that I

spent nine months in France in one of the

barracks in Verdun, France where the French people

had resisted the German attacks so completely that

they didn't overcome the city of Verdun, France and

I was in one of the actual barracks and the forts,

they called them caserne in France.

That was an interesting -- it was for nine months,

September of 1944 until May of 1945.

Borg: Roger, I haven't gotten to you recently,

although I called your name several times.

(laughter)

Borg: But I do want, we've been talking

here about moving wounded and also the deceased back

into this country.

You were based in Thailand for a time.

Beau: I was based in Thailand and the closest I

came to combat were F105's and F4's that bombed

Vietnam.

And my experience was occasionally you'd have a

plane that didn't come back or you'd have a plane

that came back shot up.

The closest thing to a casualty wasn't due to the

war but I think the plane that was taking off

probably had some battle damage and it wasn't

detected and we had an F105 taking off and it

drew my attention because the pilot and co-pilot

ejected from this plane.

It was fully loaded with fuel so it continued on

down the runway and crashed at the end of the

runway.

Meanwhile, the pilot and co-pilot were high up in

the air and the wind carried them the length of

the runway and one landed on the grass and the

second guy came down in the ball of fire.

And interesting enough, when the plane ejected

they also dropped their bombs on the runway.

And I knew the fire control guy who had to go

out and pick them up.

Now, these bombs had little propellers on the

front of them that weren't released until the bomb

was released and the propellers had to make so

many revolutions before that bomb was active.

Well, he told me that a couple of the bombs only

had two more revolutions to go.

And you just hope you aren't too nervous and

make those two revolutions.

Borg: We're going to wind up our discussion here in

one more question but I want to go back to you,

the historian, Mike Vogt, and talk about a contrast

in armaments.

Roger has been describing here taking off F105's

based in Thailand taking off to the run over Hanoi

and bombing certain targets there, many times

were shot down and those pilots, if they lived,

were in prison camps.

Contrast that with the type of fighting that went

on in World War I and the taking of prisoners.

Vogt: As far as the type of fighting in the air or

on the ground?

Borg: Not air but armaments that were being

used, number one, and then the taking of prisoners.

Vogt: In the First World War, not only nations but

economies and scientists and physicists go to war

as well.

In the late 19th century, early 20th century the

same types of technological achievements

that gave us automobiles and telephones, etcetera,

increased the killing power and the fire

capacity of the weapons that are carried by the

armies into combat in World War I.

Machine guns, magazine rifles, rapid fire

artillery, high explosive shells, take a tremendous

toll on human life, more than any prior conflict.

By the end of the First World War 8 million

soldiers from all the combatant nations had

died.

Poison gas is unveiled as a weapon by the Germans in

the spring of 1915.

So the capacity to inflict dreadful wounds and to

kill enemy soldiers is many times beyond what any

warring nations had experienced prior to that

time.

Beau: I believe that my service was brought about

because a change in the war.

Prior to mine being sent over to Thailand the U.S.

had experienced a lot of our planes were being shot

down by SAM missiles.

Borg: Surface to air missiles.

Beau: Right, surface to air missiles.

And my career field was electronic

countermeasures.

And what that meant was we had equipment on the

airplanes that detected the presence of SAM's and

could tell the pilot or the back seat operator

where the SAM was and where it was coming from

and if they were the target.

And with this information they could avoid being

struck by the SAM.

Borg: Take evasive measures.

Beau: Take evasive measures.

Borg: Yes, Caesar?

Smith: Since we're getting close to wrapping up, I

think it's important to talk about, Mike can maybe

add something to it, women have always been a part of

the military all the way from the Revolutionary War

all the way up through what we're doing now.

But they were all volunteer basis.

All the nurses, etcetera, World War I, were

volunteer basis.

Women didn't get an opportunity to be a part

of it the way they should until World War II and the

first women to come into the service came in at

Fort Des Moines in 1942 when they had the Women's

Army Corp.

I was a little kid but I remember all the women

that were in town during that period that they

started training out at Fort Des Moines.

And from that beginning, from the Revolutionary War

when they were out helping all the way up until now,

I think everybody in here ought to give Heather a

hand because being a medic in combat is really a

tough situation.

(applause)

Borg: Heather, I'm going to have you

respond to that compliment and maybe give us some

personal experiences about being a woman serving as a

medic.

And then Mike, wind up that thought, if you will,

about women's service.

And then we'll have a final question.

Dillwood: I've obviously as a female, even now, you

still meet some resistance in some regards.

But as a medic I think women, we have that

compassion.

I don't know, I think we're all capable of doing

it all.

I'm kind of speechless right now.

You kind of caught me off guard, which is really

weird for me.

I'm glad that we get the opportunity to serve just

like everybody else because we're all capable

of doing it.

And I'm glad that we're getting to, the military

is getting to the point that it's opening its

doors for women to serve everywhere.

We may not be capable of doing it just like some

men aren't capable of doing some of the jobs

women are better at, but at least the opportunity

is there.

And I'm glad that we've gotten to that point.

And it has really been an honor for me to be, to

serve as a medic as long as I did and especially in

Afghanistan to have had the opportunities to be

even a small part of people's lives and help

them the best that I could.

Borg: Michael, was it a long hard role?

Women were just getting the vote in 1919 and

during World War I they didn't even have the vote

yet so they weren't really serving, were they, in the

military at that time?

And so how did that evolve and we're still

assimilating now and adjusting to getting women

into combat roles.

What was the evolution and the thinking on that over

the years?

Vogt: There is an old saying that an army is a

reflection of the society from which it comes.

And so the same difficulties and

discriminations that people of color or females

faced in their own society are carried, are endured

in the military as well.

The Army developed the Army Nurse Corp drawing on

lessons from the Spanish-American War in

the first decade of the 20th century.

In World War I a great number of Red Cross

personnel, civilian personnel were served in

hospitals in nursing capacities in France and

in the United States.

So they were part of the war effort but when it

comes to studying the First Word War we see

images of doughboys but rarely do we see those

nurses or those medical personnel behind the

scenes.

Borg: I'd be remiss, Richard, if I didn't bring

you into this conversation because during World War

II where you served we had the WAVES, the WAC's and

maybe WAF's also, women in Air Force.

Tell me how those service people were regarded at

that time in World War II.

Peterson: I probably was lucky and not really

having any attachment to those people.

The only attachment I got to where the ladies that

run the, the donut trucks, the Red Cross ladies that

run the donut trucks because they were

quartered, when they were not out in the, with the

troops, they were in that same area that I was in

Verdun.

Borg: And that says something too, doesn't it,

Mike?

The area where he served he didn't have any contact

with the women corp that I mentioned.

Vogt: The women originally, the

organization founded at Fort Des Moines that

Caesar mentioned prior, was originally created as

the Women's Auxiliary, or Women's Army Auxiliary

Corp, WAAC with two A's.

The program was so successful that when it

was suggested that they be deployed overseas the

Congress said, wait a minute, there was nothing

about sending them overseas as an auxiliary

component.

And that is when they got rid of the auxiliary and

they became the Women's Army Corp with equal pay,

equal rank, equal military courtesy and they are

deployed overseas to do jobs, everything from

clerks to mechanics to small arms inspectors, and

so they make a significant contribution to the war

effort.

Borg: And that is the acronym that I sided,

WAC's as they were known, Women's Army Corp.

What did WAVES stand for?

Vogt: Women Accepted for Volunteer Emergency

Service and they were the Navy component.

The Marines had Marines, they didn't have any kind

of an acronym, women Marines were women

Marines.

And the Coast Guard had SPARS from their

organizational, I think it's Semper Paratus is a

Latin phrase that SPARS comes from.

Borg: Final question that I want is we're going to

wind up here, how did these wars wind up?

The basic question that I want from you is your

experience and recollection in how you

were assimilated back into society.

Caesar already is laughing so he's got a story to

tell.

And I know that Roger does.

But how were you assimilated back into

society?

Was it with ticker tape parades?

Or was it in some other manner?

And I'm going to, let's start with you because you

go back the furthest Richard in World War II.

How did you come back to this country and what kind

of a reception did you get here?

Because I know that this nation created all sorts

of benefits for you who served in World War II.

They had college tuition for you, they had other

benefits that we had never seen before.

But what did you feel about having served and

then coming out and adjusting to civilian

life?

Peterson: Well, I happened to have been ordered back

from overseas to be on the staff of the commandant of

the engineer school in Fort Belvoir.

But, we were home on leave when the bomb fell in

Japan.

So when we went back there wasn't anything for me to

do but to just come back.

There was no reception, there was nothing.

We just happened to have been, Iowa just happened

to have been in Paris, in Paris for the excitement

after the end of that part of it, come back to Des

Moines and happened to be here when Japan.

But I went back to my work at the Iowa Power and

Light Company and there was no reception, nothing

big, never has been really.

Borg: Did you use the GI Bill benefits?

Peterson: No.

I could have gone back to college because I had a

few hours to recover from because I had got out a

little early but I didn't use any of the GI

benefits.

Borg: And let's go then to Caesar.

What was the reception that you experienced?

Smith: I want to go back a second before I get to

mine.

After World War I they had a great phrase, black

soldiers in the one unit we saw in the movie, they

came back to the States, they marched in New York

City, all across the country there was a lot of

celebration, but the black soldiers didn't come back

to anything different than it was before the war,

which is very disappointing.

Equality didn't change after World War I, even

though they fought in World War I.

Equality didn't change after World War II, even

though they fought in World War II.

There's something strange about the wonderful people

of our country when it comes to what they feel

about individuals and why they feel that way because

there wasn't any acceptance at all for

those of us coming back from Vietnam.

My foreign observer, when he came back, he got spit

on for being a soldier and all the soldier is doing

is what he's supposed to do, is what he's told to

do and yet they wanted to take it out on the

soldier.

So the reception coming back for me, I wasn't

expecting anything, I didn't get anything.

So that's the way it was.

I did have one interesting thing on the plane, I was

flying in from Hawaii back to the States and a

civilian guy was sitting next to me and he said, I

was in uniform, he said, what do you think about

this crap they talk about women being in combat?

You been in combat?

I said, yes.

He said, well would you want a woman in combat

with you?

I said, anybody who is willing to fight I'd be

willing to have them next to me, I don't have any

problem with it being a woman or a man.

And he looked at me like you don't know what you're

talking about.

So that was the reception I think I got in terms of

coming back to the States.

I've seen some improvements but overall I

think everybody knows we've got a long way to go

in terms of accepting everybody because one of

the irritating things about seeing in that film

through World War I when they're talking about

immigrants and talking so bad about the Germans, of

course we know what they did with the Japanese in

World War II, and here we are now in 2017 and we're

still doing the same kind of crap in terms of who is

an American.

It's really strange that we don't know who an

American is.

(applause)

Vogt: On my drive out here today I

passed an Islamic religious center and there

was a pot of flowers outside and in that flower

pot was a sign about this big with an American flag

on it that said, we support you.

And I got to thinking about that during the

film.

I think we have come a long way in terms of race

relations including women and others in the

military, but I'm not totally convinced we have

still escaped the long shadows that were cast at

that time in the First World War.

Borg: I want to come back to you just to wrap up our

thought here on assimilation and contrast

the wars, if you will.

Roger, you came back from Vietnam.

Beau: Well, I didn't come back from Vietnam, I came

back from Thailand.

Borg: Vietnam was the time.

Beau: When I reached Travis Air Force Base I

was discharged from the service.

Borg: Travis is in northern California.

Beau: Right.

And after getting my discharge papers I grabbed

a cab in the late afternoon to air base to

fly home, Los Angeles, and when my cab pulled up

there was another cab that pulled up behind me that

an Army guy got out of and there was a war protest

going on.

Borg: Now, were you in uniform?

Beau: I was in uniform and I was carrying a duffel

bag and we became the object of the war protest.

So we got shoulder to shoulder and we had to

wait through this war protest while they were

spitting on us and hitting us with signs and one

woman came up and hacked in this soldier's face and

when we got to the doors of the terminal the police

were on the other side of the doors and they

controlled access and they let us in.

And much to my surprise they were angry and they

escorted us to a room and we were ordered to stay

there until our flight left.

Borg: Just for your own protection.

Beau: Just for our protection and probably

not to cause any more riots.

Borg: Okay, you had something more to say.

Beau: Well, I think I need to tell you the rest of

the story.

I got on the plane and it was late in the evening

and my next stop was Minneapolis, Minnesota.

When I got to Minneapolis, Minnesota it was after

midnight and I and the fellow passengers

retrieved our luggage and I was left there to wander

the corridors, which were darkened and there wasn't

a soul around, and I'm walking down this corridor

and out from a side corridor this guy steps

out and the place just echoed.

He said, are you a GI?

And I said, yes.

He said, would you come here?

That scared me to the boots.

So I walked out and he said, I have a cot for

you.

Borg: Because you had to spend the night.

Beau: Because I had to spend the night and after

flying back from Southeast Asia the barracks that

they put me up in that first night was full of

guys that were getting out and they were celebrating

all night so there wasn't much sleep there.

And so I got some needed rest and the next thing I

knew he shook me awake and he said, your plane is

leaving.

I grabbed my stuff and here they held the plane

for me.

And then I got on and the most amazing thing that

happened, we took off, it was foggy and we got above

the clouds and it was bright, this was August of

'72 and I looked down and it was like the Garden of

Eden coming home.

(applause)

Borg: I can identify with that, not

that I experienced that, but I saw it.

I mentioned meeting the C5 at Andrews Air Force Base

at about 3:30, 4:00 one morning.

You can imagine how empty the runway and the

taxiways there are at that time.

The C5 pulls up finally, the door comes down, I

walk into that plane and just see stretcher upon

stretcher piled high just having loaded at Tan Son

Nhut in South Vietnam and then flying over the poles

landing at Andrews.

One of the most meaningful things that I'll never

forget, and it goes to the emotion that you were just

showing here about that story, is a nurse saying

to one of the GI's on one of those -- there was all

kinds of moaning that you can imagine in that plane

as I walked in and that very eerie feeling and she

said, you're okay, you're okay, you're home.

And what a meaningful statement that was.

Heather, what was your experience coming back?

Dillwood: Well, for the Guard, and I think active

duty is similar, we fly into a demobilization

base.

So we have to go somewhere they demobilize us and we

have doctor's appointments and things and then we

come back to the state and thee is a ceremony and we

get in formation and they have music and speakers

and they welcome us home and your families are

welcome to be a part of it.

It's pretty amazing to be part of it and it's very

emotional to have all of that support and to

finally be back.

Borg: You didn't encounter any hostility that you've

heard described here?

Dillwood: No, no I've never in all my years

being in I've never encountered it.

Borg: In fact, have you ever had people come to

you and say, thank you for your service?

Dillwood: Yes, multiple times.

It's always a little weird.

Borg: And Michael -- it's always a little weird?

Dillwood: Yeah, oh yeah because you don't know

what to say.

We don't do it because we want the thanks, we do it

because we're proud to do it.

We do it because we want to.

Borg: Mike, you've heard the stories here.

Just wrap it up for us on you're okay, you're home.

What did people experience contrasted over the years

and why did it change?

Vogt: The victorious armies, the sailor's

Marines that arrived home in the First World War as

Caesar indicated, they were met with parades and

some fanfare.

There was a big parade for the 168 Infantry of the

Iowa National Guard down on Grand Avenue through a

victory arch and they posed on the grounds of

the Capitol to have their photo take.

The Capitol hangs opposite the Governor's office at

the State Capitol if you want to see what that

image looks like.

World War II there was a great degree of fanfare

for those that were able to participate.

But Korea, Vietnam and other struggles around the

world have been more, I hate to use Harry Truman's

phrase, but they have been more police actions, they

have been limited in scope.

Now for the veterans that have to participate in

them it's war just the same.

But these limited actions, fighting guerillas,

fighting insurgencies, the sense of it being over,

the sense to the feeling to want to celebrate just

hasn't been there.

Borg: Thank you so much for sharing your insights

and your experiences.

It has just been enlightening for me and I

know for those of you who are watching.

We've been listening here to Mike Vogt down on the

end, Richard Peterson, Roger Beau, Heather

Dillwood and Caesar Smith.

I'm Dean Borg and I just want to remind you that on

Iowa Public Television as a part of the PBS series

that is coming now on Monday, Tuesday and

Wednesday from 8:00 at night until 10:00 at

night, two hours each night on those three

nights this week, The Great War.

Thank you.

(applause)

For more infomation >> The Great War Panel Discussion - Duration: 1:00:24.

-------------------------------------------

Seeding the Cosmos for Life Violent and Explosive Star Birth Captured in the Orion Molecular Cloud - Duration: 8:11.

Seeding the Cosmos for Life Violent and Explosive Star Birth Captured in the Orion Molecular

Cloud

Star birth can be a violent and explosive event, as dramatically illustrated in new

ALMA images.Around 500 years ago, a pair of adolescent protostars had a perilously close

encounter that blasted their stellar nursery apart.

Astronomers using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) have examined the widely scattered

debris from this explosive event, gaining new insights into the sometimes-fierce relationship

among sibling stars.

Shortly after starting to form some 100,000 years ago, several protostars in the Orion

Molecular Cloud 1 (OMC-1), a dense and active star factory about 1,500 light-years from

Earth just behind the Orion Nebula, latched onto each other gravitationally and gradually

drew closer.

Eventually, two of these stars either grazed each other or collided, triggering a powerful

eruption that launched other nearby protostars and hundreds of giant streamers of dust and

gas into interstellar space at speeds greater than 150 kilometers per second.

This cataclysmic interaction released as much energy as our Sun emits over the course of

10 million years.

Today, the remains of this spectacular explosion are visible from Earth.

"What we see in this once calm stellar nursery is a cosmic version of a 4th of July fireworks

display, with giant streamers rocketing off in all directions," said John Bally with the

University of Colorado and lead author on a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal.

Groups of stars such as those in OMC-1 are born when a cloud of gas hundreds of times

more massive than our Sun begins to collapse under its own gravity.

In the densest regions, protostars form and begin to drift about randomly.

Over time, this random motion can dampen, which allows some of the stars to fall toward

a common center of gravity, usually dominated by a particularly large protostar.

If these stars draw too close to each other before they drift away into the galaxy, violent

interactions can occur.

According to the researchers, such explosions are expected to be relatively short lived,

with the remnants like those seen by ALMA lasting only centuries.

"Though fleeting, protostellar explosions may be relatively common," said Bally.

"By destroying their parent cloud, as we see in OMC-1, such explosions may also help to

regulate the pace of star formation in these giant molecular clouds."

Bally and his team observed this feature previously with the Gemini-South telescope in Chile.

These earlier images, taken in the near infrared, reveal the remarkable structure of the streamers,

which extend nearly a light-year from end to end.

Hints of the explosive nature of this outflow were first uncovered in 2009 with the Submillimeter

Array in Hawaii.

The new ALMA data, however, provide much greater clarity, unveiling important details about

the distribution and high-velocity motion of the carbon monoxide (CO) gas inside the

streamers.

This helps astronomers understand the underlying force of the blast and the impact such events

could have on star formation across the galaxy.

"People most often associate stellar explosions with ancient stars, like a nova eruption on

the surface of a decaying star or the even more spectacular supernova death of an extremely

massive star," Bally says.

"ALMA has given us new insights into explosions on the other end of the stellar life cycle,

star birth."

The Orion Nebula, also known as M42, is one of the brightest and most famous nebulae in

the sky.

The star forming region's glowing gas clouds and hot young stars are on the right in this

sharp and colorful two frame mosaic that includes the smaller nebula M43 near center and dusty,

bluish reflection nebulae NGC 1977 on the left.

Located at the edge of an otherwise invisible giant molecular cloud complex, astronomers

have also identified what appear to be numerous infant solar systems.

6a00d8341bf7f753ef0154356ce1c7970c-800wi

Orion is a cosmic zoo, with protoplanetary disks, brown dwarfs, intense and turbulent

motions of the gas, and the photo-ionizing effects of massive nearby stars as well as

supersonic "bullets" -- each ten times the diameter of Pluto's orbit and tipped with

iron atoms glowing bright blue, believed to have been formed one thousand years ago from

an unknown violent event.

Over 13 billion years ago at least one of the domains of life may have begun in nebular

clouds.

If restricted to the Milky Way, which is 13.6 billion years old, the first chemical combinations

would have had billions of years to become a self-replicating organism with a DNA genome

long before the existence of Earth.

Nebular clouds are thought to be most likely environment for synthesizing and promoting

the evolution of molecules needed for the origin of life.

Giant gas nebulae such as Orion are storehouses of sugars that form ribose -- the backbone

of RNA.

With a universe full of sugar, it's possible that early RNA worlds were generated and are

evolving in their own unique ways throughout the observable universe.

RNA coding is what gave primitive cell structures the catalyst they needed to become life.

The building blocks for DNA could have been generated or combined within interstellar

clouds and DNA would become part of the molecular-protein-amino acid complex.

Hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, calcium, sulfur, nitrogen and phosphorus for example are continually

irradiated by ions, which can generate small organic molecules which evolve into larger

complex organic molecules that result in the formation of amino acids and other compounds.

Phosphorus, for example, is rare in our solar system and may have been non-existent on the

early Earth; phosphorus is essential for the manufacture of DNA.

Polarized radiation in the nebula cloud leads to the formation of proteins, nucleobases

and then DNA.

The combination of hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, cyanide and several other elements,

could create adenine, which is a DNA base, whereas oxygen and phosphorus could ladder

DNA base pairs.

Glycine has also been identified in the interstellar clouds.

In 2009, the Herschel Space Observatory using the telescope's heterodyne instrument for

the far infrared revealed the chemical fingerprints of potentially life-enabling organic molecules

in the Orion nebula, one of the most prolific chemical factories in space, although the

full extent of its chemistry and the pathways for molecule formation

are not well understood.

For more infomation >> Seeding the Cosmos for Life Violent and Explosive Star Birth Captured in the Orion Molecular Cloud - Duration: 8:11.

-------------------------------------------

Stepfather: Jakubowski 'as dangerous as they say he is' - Duration: 2:28.

For more infomation >> Stepfather: Jakubowski 'as dangerous as they say he is' - Duration: 2:28.

-------------------------------------------

Is This The Beginning Of The End For U S Empire? - poltics - Duration: 8:41.

Is This The Beginning Of The End For U.S. Empire?

Before I get into the meat of this post, I want to revisit something I wrote back in

January.

From the post, Very Powerful People in the U.S. Government Want War � This is Their

Sales Pitch:

We need to understand that those who want this war will be absolutely relentless. The

sales pitch will not end until they get exactly what they want. This is where all of us critical

thinkers need to play a key role. We must be prepared to diligently analyze all unsubstantiated

official claims, and push back against the war-mongers, because we know for certain the

oligarch-owned corporate media won�t. We must be prepared to inform our fellow citizens

about what�s happening so that we don�t fall victim to a cheap sales pitch with devastating

consequences. Unfortunately, we must also be prepared for a possible deep state false

flag if the current sales tactic falls on deaf ears.

America cannot win a global war of such a scale if it is based on false pretenses and

in the absence of exceedingly strong public support. This support does not exist. Will

this serve as a necessary restraint against the masters of war and their devious plans?

It�s too early to tell, but I do know that if we are unnecessarily pushed into a global

conflagration, it will not end well for us. If this is the road our twisted status quo

insists on taking us down, let us never forget who they are and the self-serving motivations

behind their actions.

Four months later, the deep state got exactly what it wanted. Trump�s weaknesses have

been identified and exploited, and he�s successfully been manipulated into neocon

foreign policy like George W. Bush and Barack Obama before him. I�ve spent much of the

past several months warning about exactly what happened last night, but the die is now

cast. There�s no turning back from the path we�re on.

And don�t give me this garbage about Trump playing �4D chess.� Trump�s a brilliant

salesman, and that�s about it. There�s nothing special or superior about Donald Trump

intellectually, and he�s one of the most unwise people to ever become President. There

was a hope he meant what he said about non-interventionism during the campaign, but that hope should

be entirely extinguished at this point. Trump is a very weak man desperately looking for

praise from those he claims to hate.

The purpose of today�s post is not to discuss what happened last night. All of you have

read the news by now. My intent today is to explain what I think this means for the years

ahead. I believe last night�s strike represents the beginning of the end for U.S. empire.

Although the U.S. has been declining domestically for this entire century, America has still

been calling all the shots on the international front. This makes sense in late-stage empire,

as the focus of the fat and happy �elite� becomes singularly obsessed with domination

and power, while the situation back home festers and rots.

Trump won on an �America first� platform that promised to emphasize the well-being

of American citizens over geopolitical adventurism. We now know for certain he�s been manipulated

into the imperial mindset, and his recklessness will merely accelerate U.S. decline on the

world stage, and in turn, back home.

If anyone�s playing 4D chess it�s Russia. Russia is anti-fragile at this point, as has

been proved by Putin�s survival in the face of economic sanctions, a collapsing ruble

and a plunge in oil prices. Putin is still standing and arguably as powerful as ever.

Not to mention the fact that the USSR completely disintegrated and collapsed within the past

30 years. They�ve been through a lot as a people. Meanwhile, the U.S. is extraordinarily

fragile and weak by comparison, a distinction that will become quite obvious to us all in

the years ahead. I don�t say this with any hint of glee or schadenfreude, I�m just

stating the facts as I see them.

None of this implies that Russia�s leadership are a bunch of good people by any means. What

I am saying is that they are a thousand times more strategic and intelligent compared to

U.S. leadership.

To prove the point, this would be a good time to review a post I published back in 2014,

Tensions Between the U.S. and Russia Are Worse Than You Realize � Remarks by Foreign Minister

Sergey Lavrov. Here�s some of what I noted:

There are two reasons I think the following remarks by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey

Lavrov are so important.

First, as someone who spends much of his time analyzing and critiquing the many destructive

policy decisions made by American �leaders,� I was shocked to find how accurate his description

of the U.S. power structure�s mindset seems to be. He gets it, and he is more or less

trying to warn the world that America�s leaders are basically power-drunk children.

I concur.

Second, Lavrov also describes the negative impact that this behavior has had on the Russian

psyche generally. He expresses dismay that the U.S. status quo sees the world as unipolar,

and attempts to tackle every problem from the perspective that might is right. In no

uncertain terms, Lavrov makes it clear that Russia will not stand for this. I don�t

think the Russians are bluffing, so this is a very dangerous situation.

If there was actually someone in the U.S. State Department capable of such introspective

and clear thinking, we might actually defuse this situation. Don�t hold your breath.

You should really read the entire post to see Lavrov�s comments for yourself in order

to truly understand why I came to the above conclusions.

U.S. leadership is an absolute joke and will drive this entire country into a brick wall

in the years ahead. John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Chucky Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, are you kidding

me? They remind me of George Armstrong Custer, and we all know how that turned out.

The media is even worse. In what Glenn Greenwald accurately called �one of the sickest things

ever to appear on US television,� MSNBC�s Brian Williams gushed about the �beauty�

of U.S. cruise missiles.

This is not the sort of thing you see in a confident, brave, and civilized nation, it�s

the sort of stuff you�d expect to see toward the end. It�s the stuff of craven war-mongers,

of dishonest cowards, of a totally deranged and very dangerous media. The signs are everywhere;

imperial decline is set to accelerate rapidly in the coming years.

Fine, but how is all this going to play out? Obviously nobody really knows, but I do think

we�ve entered a new period in American history. I think it�s basically a crossing of the

Rubicon moment for the American empire. Personally, I don�t expect a strong and visible military

response from Russia in the near-term. I don�t think Putin wants to give the U.S. media and

newly minted neocon Donald Trump an excuse to do anything truly crazy, which they can

blame on Russia in the court of public opinion. I think Putin is too smart for that. Rather,

what I think he�ll do is make all sorts of moves behind the scenes to weaken America�s

economic power, while at the same time engaging in minor provocations to tempt the imbeciles

in charge of U.S. foreign policy to make further mistakes abroad, to which they�ll emphatically

oblige.

In other words, Russia will attempt to make the U.S. extend itself further in a region

where no real success is possible, at the same time that the American economy deteriorates

further. Recall that the current very weak economic �recovery� has been going on

for nearly a decade. This cycle is very long in the tooth, and all Russia really needs

to do is sit back, make some moves behind the scenes and allow the U.S. to collapse

upon itself in its hubris and stupidity. This is precisely what I think is going to happen.

Expect more of all the above as the U.S. empire enters its most devastating phase of collapse.

Think about what it might mean for you and your family and prepare accordingly.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét