Waching daily Jan 28 2017

Barack Obama Is Now The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of 3% GDP Growth

by Tyler Durden.

Following today's extremely disappointing US GDP growth data, we have the final nail

in the coffin of President Obama's economic reign.

Not only is the average annual growth rate of just 1.48% during Obama's business cycle

the weakest of any expansion since at least 1949, he has just become the only President

to have not had even one year of 3% GDP growth.

An average annual GDP growth of 1.48% during Obama's two terms...

As a reminder to a few blinkered media types, this means President Obama's "recovery" has

officially been the worst recovery in US history (despite adding almost $10 trillion to the

national debt)...

And worse still, Barack Obama is the only president in US history to never have a year

of economic growth over 3.0%...

As we noted previously, every other president in American history, even the really bad ones,

had at least one year when U.S. GDP grew by at least 3 percent.

But this has not happened under Obama even though he has had two terms in the White House.

As a reminder, this dismal economic track record came at the same as President Obama

almost doubled the National Debt...

When 'fake news' and 'peddling fiction' meet 'alternative facts'.

For more infomation >> Barack Obama Is Now The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of 3% GDP Growth - Duration: 2:24.

-------------------------------------------

Vegan Cheetah: Veganism is an Open Source Movement - Duration: 16:53.

Hey there modern vegans and vegan curious.

It's Margaret, and welcome back to ModVegan.

Today I want to talk about something that I believe is worth addressing within the vegan

community.

And that is the issue of plagiarism.

This was brought up earlier in the week by a vegan gossip columnist that is called the

Vegan Cheetah.

And he went after a very influential and very helpful of the vegan community, Emily from

Bite Size Vegan.

...Accusing her of plagiarism, and saying that she had taken some of the information

for her video on wool from another YouTuber called Erin Janus.

In his initial video, Vegan Cheetah made reference to two videos about wool:

The first from Erin Janus, the second from Bite Size Vegan.

Both were about wool, and both seem to contain fairly similar facts.

But I do believe that some very important additional pieces of information were left

out of this video.

The first is that Emily from Bite Size Vegan had produced a video about wool just a few

months earlier,

that discussed many of the same things that were in both of the subsequent videos.

And the second, very important piece of information is the fact that Emily's videos are much shorter

than Erin's.

They have very different approaches to their content,

and I must say, Emily is one of the reasons that I became a vegan, and her short, bite-sized

bits of content are an incredible asset to the vegan community.

One of the things that Charles neglects to mention in his video is the fact that every

vegan voice is unique.

We live in an information age, and information passes at the speed of light.

We all have unique voices, and I would say that Erin and Emily have extremely unique,

different voices that appeal to very different audiences,

and convey information in very different ways.

Whether or not they use some of the same facts in their videos is immaterial.

We all tend to use the same facts.

Especially when we're talking about something such as wool,

where there are a series of pieces of information that we may use in any order whatsoever, that

are all fairly similar.

The first contention that I would like to make,

is that this is an open source community.

And it has to be.

One of the unique characteristics of social media, and of YouTube in general, is that

content creators need to be agile.

We need to be swift in our ability to convey information to each other.

And we all have unique and different points of view.

The idea that we need to keep our information to ourselves,

and retain our intellectual property, is the antithesis of what we should be doing in this

movement.

If your concern is primarily protecting your intellectual property,

YouTube is not the place for you.

You probably should be engaging in more traditional forms of media,

such as traditional broadcasting, such as book publishing.

And if Erin Janus wishes to produce books on her topic,

and state them there for the record, she's absolutely welcome to.

But if she wants to share information with the vegan community at large,

and have vegans believe that she genuinely cares about veganism as a movement,

she needs to understand that we are all sharing information here,

and that is vital.

Now I do believe that it's important to give credit to the people that have inspired you.

I recently made a video about Dr. Travis Stork and his entire new book about the "Lose Your

Belly Diet",

and the fact that it was kind of a reducetarian diet, in effect.

I was inspired to do this video when I saw Happy Healthy Vegan's video about the topic,

and I decided to go and read the book for myself.

My video obviously is somewhat different from Ryan's,

because in my video, I tend to focus more on the fact that it's reducetarian,

he talks about it being plant-based.

Those are different approaches and they're from very different personalities.

And I appreciate very much that Ryan noticed that first,

and I would love to give him credit right here.

And that's something that we can do as YouTubers.

We can always acknowledge other people,

and that's a wonderful part of YouTube, is that it's very easy to mention the inspiration

that we have for our videos.

But, if the movement is your motivation,

you should never be concerned about having a video "copied."

I recently made a video about leather that took me weeks to research.

I spent hours and hours - I have no idea how much time - researching that topic.

And only a very small portion of that information went into the final video,

because I wanted it to be short enough for people to be able to absorb the information.

I was pleased the other day to see an article in an online publication related to the same

topic,

using a lot of the same sources that I did.

And rather than being concerned that they had "stolen" my content or some stupid thing

like that,

I was very proud and happy that other people were beginning to be interested in the same

topic.

And that's the attitude that you need to have if you want to be involved in social media.

You need to be excited.

If you see something from one of your videos included in other people's videos,

be excited!

Be proud!

Whether they cite you as a source or not.

This is a movement.

And more importantly than just being any other part of social media,

veganism is about changing hearts and minds.

And if we want to do that, we need to spread information.

I was also pleased when a friend of mine asked if he could share my video on his channel.

He actually took (and frequently does) he'll take the entire video and upload it and show

it to other people.

And that makes me very happy, because I know that my audience is small.

I realize that many of you don't get to see all of my videos,

that my videos are just a tiny portion of vegan YouTube.

And I get that!

And I'm happy whenever anyone is talking about some of the things that I do.

If someone, like a large vegan channel such as Freelee the Banana Girl, or Vegan Gains

uses something from one of my videos, I would be honoured!

And you should be too.

This is about sharing information, it is not about intellectual property.

And I think that's something that really needs to go on in the vegan community.

We need to understand - and in YouTube as a whole -

we need to start to understand the open source nature of what we are doing.

If you are constantly concerned about having your content "stolen"

or having other people use the hard work that you've done,

then you're in the wrong business.

You should be in a traditional publishing format,

and you would probably be much happier there.

We are fortunate enough to live in an age where our ability to influence others is not

limited by the speed at which a medieval monk is able to copy the sentences he finds in

manuscript!

It is far different, and I am so grateful for that fact.

I am infinitely grateful that we live in an age when I can tell you something immediately

and have you guys see it the next day.

Or that day, for that matter.

Or live, for that matter.

It's a wonderful gift.

And the idea that we should be jealous of this information,

that we should be saving it and keeping it for ourselves,

making sure that we get the proper credit -

is not only selfish, it's impractical in this day and age.

If there's anything that we have learned from the open source era,

it's that we all have a different lens through which we look at information.

Since time immemorial, people have been taking stories and using them in different ways.

If you're familiar with even medieval literature,

you understand that many of the sources for those stories

are taken from stories written long, long ago.

And as they say, "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery".

And that is not for any small reason.

We use information because it's valuable.

And we share it because it's valuable.

If you created something that is valuable,

that you want other people to share, you should be proud when you see it elsewhere.

Every single person who uses that information is going to see it from a different lens.

We all have different life experiences, we see things differently.

We have a different approach.

And that is a wonderful thing.

It is one of the most beautiful things about the internet.

Because it allows us all to see things from a unique perspective and to share things in

our own unique way.

And that is something that we are able to do here within vegan YouTube.

And I think that it is a tremendous gift.

It is imperative that we have multiple voices sharing information.

Particularly within a movement as small as the vegan YouTube movement.

We are a tiny movement!

I don't think it's possible to pretend that we are anything else.

We're a small portion of the population attempting to share what we know with a larger audience.

And within that framework, it is so valuable to have those different voices.

I think we can all appreciate that certain YouTubers are more influential with us than

others are.

I know there are some voices that are easier for me to understand and work with than there

are others.

There are others that perhaps just don't resonate with me.

And that's fine!

That's one of the beauties of this platform.

Fortunately, a voice like Emily's carries with it a lot of weight.

She's able to reach a large audience, and that's evident within the numbers from her

channel.

What I would ask you, as an audience member, as a viewer, as a content creator -

if you appreciate what Emily does, I would just love it if you would share with her how

much she has meant to you.

I sent her an email yesterday, I don't know if she'll ever even get the chance to read

it,

but at least she will be able to see that other people support her.

Emily's "bite-size nuggets" are an essential and vital source of information.

And I appreciate them so much, and I know that countless others do so as well.

I have young children, and so the fact that her wool video was intended for children is

extremely important.

I've got a five year old and a seven year old,

and they're going to get more out of her video than they would from a video like Erin Janus'.

If you like Emily and you appreciate her content,

what I would recommend: please don't go to Charles' channel or to Erin's channel.

I really don't want any of you guys to do any of those things.

What I would like you to do is to express your appreciation directly to Emily.

If she's made a difference in your life, please just take this as a chance to let her know

what she's meant to you.

I can't even begin to say what Emily has meant in my life,

in the life of my kids, who very much appreciate her bite-size nuggets.

She's an extremely important resource, and such a valuable voice in our community.

Someone that can be recognized by traditional mainstream press and also by people within

the vegan movement.

She is one of my favourite YouTubers,

and I think that almost anyone can say that she contributes a huge amount of value to

the vegan movement.

The kind of work that she does -

even if she were just taking other people's information and condensing it into a bite

sized nugget,

it takes a lot of time, research and effort in order to be able to do that.

And it is valuable in the extreme.

To say that is a form of "ripping people off,"

or that it is a way of taking advantage of others is just sad.

Let Emily know how much she's meant to you.

Please tell her how much you value her.

And I must say that within the past few months since I've joined YouTube,

I have been so desperately saddened to see many people quit because of cyber bullying.

This is ridiculous.

And it's getting to the point where it is threatening the vegan movement as a whole.

We need to stand up to these bullies, and not by going after them directly.

Instead, what we need to do is support the other voices.

To let them know that they are listened to,

to let them know that they are heard.

To let them know that we appreciate them and the hard, hard work that they do.

Please do that.

I would love to see everyone who sees this video sending a message to Emily letting her

know that they appreciate the work that she does.

Even if Emily's latest period of silence has absolutely nothing to do with this cyber bullying,

I think she'd still appreciate it.

So my recommendation for you is to please just send her a note of appreciation.

Let her know that we can't afford to lose any more voices within this movement.

It is absolutely tragic that we have lost so many people over the past few months,

simply because people feel so much pressure.

When Charles says that people like Emily of Bite Size Vegan are "scamming people" and

taking their money, it is laughable.

The idea that a few dollars so that someone can actually make this their life's work is

scamming people

- is somewhat sickening to me.

I find it absolutely unintelligible, the notion that allowing people to do this as a life's

mission is somehow scamming people.

If people want to share their resources in order to be able to extend the capacity, the

reach for some of these people like BIte-Size Vegan, that is a wonderful thing.

We should be encouraging content creators to continue creating great content and helping

everybody else within their own efforts.

Creating content is not easy.

And that is one very true part of Charles' video.

It's not easy.

It's a lot of work.

It's hard work.

It's long hours put in for no return whatsoever.

And the amount of money that Emily makes off of these things is absolutely miniscule compared

to the amount of effort that she puts in.

To begrudge someone that, to begrudge them the fact that they're able to put in a life

working in activism - is frankly nauseating to me.

The idea that we should be doing this

- either for nothing, or that we should simply tear down others in order to make our money

-

is ridiculous.

It's not easy to make it on YouTube.

I can say for myself that I spend far, far too many hours every week working on YouTube.

And I'm sure that many of you probably realize this and are probably in the same boat.

But I certainly do not begrudge Emily the fact that she has been able to make this a

decent minimum wage job based on her efforts.

If that is scamming people, then we need a lot more scammers in this world.

The idea that making a minimum wage income off of YouTube is "scamming people" is frankly

ridiculous.

If someone is putting that many hours into research and dissemination of important information,

then more power to them.

I wish more people were able to do YouTube full time!

It would be a wonderful thing.

And I think that is a decent goal for anybody.

The fact that...if you can make a living off of YouTube, then that's a wonderful thing!

I'm not jealous of you, I don't begrudge you anything.

I think that's fantastic!

Especially if you're doing something worthwhile with your time.

If you have a message, that's beautiful!

So instead of being jealous of people,

instead of fearing people taking our content,

let's share.

Let's make this an open source project.

Let's share the information and grow the vegan movement,

and let's roundly and loudly reject the idea that this is an issue of intellectual property

and keeping our information to ourselves.

We're sharing this information because it's important.

Because it needs to get out.

And if people don't like that, then they need to join another medium.

Go to traditional publishing.

If you're that great at creating content, go to NBC, ABC -

any of the traditional media outlets, and share your information with them!

You'll have plenty of lawyers keeping your intellectual property sacrosanct.

But if having your intellectual be sacrosanct is your highest ideal,

that's the place for you.

Not here.

I want to thank you all for watching, I realize this is not what I normally make videos about,

but I do think it's important for the vegan movement as a whole.

And I'm concerned about how many people that we've lost in recent months.

And Emily cannot be another one.

I will not stand for her being another casualty of cyber-bullying.

Let's stand up, let's show her how much we care.

Please send her a message, let her know how much her videos have meant to you, and let's

turn this around and let the cyber bullies know that this is not what veganism is about.

This is not what the YouTube movement of veganism is about.

And let's just work together to make this a better world.

Thank you so much for watching,

and I will see you in my next video.

Take care,

bye.

For more infomation >> Vegan Cheetah: Veganism is an Open Source Movement - Duration: 16:53.

-------------------------------------------

DEVASTATED THAT TRUMP IS PRESIDENT YOU MAY HAVE A DANGEROUS RELIANCE ON THE STATE - Duration: 10:10.

DEVASTATED THAT TRUMP IS PRESIDENT YOU MAY HAVE A DANGEROUS RELIANCE ON THE STATE.

The inauguration is behind us now, but many � millions, it seems � are still immersed

in fear, anguish, and grief over the reality of President Donald Trump.

#NotMyPresident is still a very active hashtag on Twitter.

People are already calling for impeachment, claiming Trump�s presidency is �illegitimate�.

Celebrities (I refuse to mention them by name here and give them more attention) are still

using their platforms to express anger, disappointment, and distress over the Trump presidency.

Protests continue, and people are venting and ranting and arguing on social media.

But maybe � just maybe � the widespread frustration and despair over the election

outcome is unnecessary. Please understand that I fully support free

speech and peaceful protesting, and my intention here is not to criticize those who have been

attending protests or participating in other forms of activism.

No, I am not going to lecture anyone about that, or attempt to discredit or berate those

who are vocal about their concerns regarding what is to come in the next four (or more)

years. Many concerns are legitimate, and I am grateful that more people are speaking

up and attempting to make their voices heard. But I believe it is time to let the shock

of the election inspire something positive � true action.

Perhaps the time for lamentation has passed, and it is now time to DO the things we can

to make our world a better place. In other words, I believe that we are responsible

for our own lives, and that shifting focus to what we CAN control is a much healthier

and beneficial approach than continuing down a path of despair.

So, I have a question for those who are in panic mode right now and think Trump is going

to ruin everything� If you are devastated about who the president

is, do you think it might be a sign that you rely on � or even worship � the State

just a bit too much? As I stated before, many of the concerns people

are expressing are undoubtedly legitimate. Will Trump�s administration continue to

expand the police state? Will there be more war? How will immigration be handled? Will

peaceful people who use cannabis be caged? What will happen to the US healthcare system?

Are taxes going to decrease, or increase? These are issues that we don�t have much

control over. In case you haven�t noticed by now, the government is ultimately going

to do what it wants, will of the people be damned.

There are concerns, however, that are arguably less legitimate. The �right� to health

care is a significant one. Trump is already taking steps to dismantle Obamacare, and this

is causing (understandable) anxiety for those who relied on the program.

But if access to medical care is truly a right, that means we have the right to the labor

of others. As I explained a few days ago�

Positive rights require others to provide you with either a good or service. A negative

right, on the other hand, only requires others to abstain from interfering with your actions.

If we are free and equal by nature, and if we believe in negative rights, any positive

rights would have to be grounded in consensual arrangements.

Health care and free birth control are two �rights� many claim to have, but that

is a perversion of the concept of rights. Claiming the �right� to free healthcare,

for example, would mean that it is okay to infringe upon the negative rights of taxpayers

and healthcare providers. The government cannot infringe upon our rights to pursue health

care, buy birth control, and purchase other items and services � but no one owes anyone

healthcare. It is a good, just like food, clothing, and other things we are free to

buy. In other words, a right is not something someone

gives you � it is something that no one can take away, or prevent you from pursuing.

For those who believe that access to health care and other taxpayer-funded government

programs is a right, I have a question for you:

Would you be willing to rob others to fund those programs?

That may sound like a crazy question, but think of it this way: What happens to people

if they refuse to pay taxes? Are you SURE you are okay with using the force

of government to make others pay for things you want?

Keep in mind that this could backfire on you at some point in the future.

I can�t fully blame Americans for believing it is the government�s job to take care

of them. After all, the State�s existence continues for that very reason: People have

been conditioned to believe they can�t survive without it. This indoctrination begins at

a very young age, especially for those who attend public schools.

Americans have gotten used to the idea that they have �rights� that are, in reality,

privileges � privileges that the government can take away with the stroke of a pen.

For example, the very powers that Obama used to implement the ACA are now being used by

Trump to dismantle that program.

Worrying about what might happen during a Trump regime will not change a thing.

However, being proactive and taking personal responsibility for the things we can control

can help us feel more empowered and independent. Learning about agorism, free-market healthcare

(also called concierge care), growing your own food, buying locally, trading goods and

services within your community, homeschooling your children, and collaborating with family,

friends, and neighbors on projects can help you substantially reduce your reliance on

the government. Learn and/or develop skills that will be useful to you and your community.

Prepare and plan for job losses, economic crashes, and other possible disasters or hardships.

Donate to charities and GoFundMe campaigns. Volunteer. Feed the homeless. Help each other

in times of need. Agorism is a social philosophy that advocates

creating a society in which all relations between people are voluntary exchanges by

means of counter-economics. The concept was first proposed by libertarian philosopher

Samuel Edward Konkin III: Konkin�s agorism, as exposited in his New

Libertarian Manifesto, postulates that the correct method of achieving a voluntary society

is through advocacy and growth of the underground economy or �black market� � the �counter-economy�

as Konkin put it � until such a point that the State�s perceived moral authority and

outright power have been so thoroughly undermined that revolutionary market anarchist legal

and security enterprises are able to arise from underground and ultimately suppress government

as a criminal activity (with taxation being treated as theft, war being treated as mass

murder, et cetera). Agorists stress the importance of alternative

strategies outside political systems to achieve a free society. Agorists claim that such a

society could be freed more readily by employing methods such as education, direct action,

alternative currencies like Bitcoin, entrepreneurship, self sufficiency, civil disobedience and � most

importantly � counter-economics, which was defined by Konkin as:

The Counter-Economy is the sum of all non-aggressive Human Action which is forbidden by the State.

Counter-economics is the study of the Counter-Economy and its practices. The Counter-Economy includes

the free market, the Black Market, the �underground economy,� all acts of civil and social disobedience,

all acts of forbidden association (sexual, racial, cross-religious), and anything else

the State, at any place or time, chooses to prohibit, control, regulate, tax, or tariff.

The Counter-Economy excludes all State-approved action (the �White Market�) and the Red

Market (violence and theft not approved by the State).

It�s time to face the truth: the government does not care about you. It�s up to you

to take control over your life. You own yourself, after all, and that�s a great thing.

�A majority that yields to the promises of security instead of seeking liberty and

self-reliance is giving up something real and valuable in return for false promises.

The fact that strong leaders are willing to demagogue, spin, deceive, and lie proves their

goal is neither to care for the people nor to advance liberty. Instead, it�s their

perverted desire to rule over others that drives them. But, even authoritarian regimes

don�t last if there isn�t general acceptance of their governance by the people.� ? Ron

Paul If you are upset about Trump�s presidency

(or even the existence of government at all) directing that energy towards attaining as

much self-reliance as possible � and as little dependence on the State as possible

� may do wonders for your outlook. What can you DO to make life better

for yourself, those you care about, and your community?

For more infomation >> DEVASTATED THAT TRUMP IS PRESIDENT YOU MAY HAVE A DANGEROUS RELIANCE ON THE STATE - Duration: 10:10.

-------------------------------------------

Formula of Empathy for Patient Experience-USMLE-Step 2 CS Exam - Duration: 3:19.

Welcome to Vital Checklist where we make unique doctors with the help of emergent coaching

and the Road to USMLE book, authored by Dr. Harpreet Singh a practicing physician in the

United States.

This one book will teach you how to make patients happy and is based on years of clinical and

teaching experience.

Introducing Dr. Harpreet Singh.

Hi, I am Dr. Harpreet Singh.

I am chief medical author of Road to USMLE step 2 Clinical skills..

Now, most of the medical students have difficulty in answering challenging questions.

As I have experience in my Vital Checklist workshop.

What I am going to do is, I am going to teach an easy to remember, difficult to forget methodology

for answering those challenging questions.

Let�s dive in.

This is called �Lucky Touch.� L - Label the emotions.

If the patient is crying, give them tissue paper.

U - Understanding.

Try to understand the patient's concern, then speak.

C - Commend, always congratulate or commend the patient and then recommend it.

K - Keep is simple and smart.

With the help of pictures, checklist, acronyms.

Try to explain the patient in great detail why you want to do it.

And last but not the least always start with the why of the issue, not what you have to

do.

make a log book.

Why do you have to make a log book?

Because you can see what the patient�s issues are, it gets managed.

Touch - always make sure you have a good handshake with the patient.

Always make sure you have touching the patient in the elbow or arm.

Always make sure you have respect for the patient and I call this �mothers rule.�

I always think, what if you patient is you mother, what if you patient is your sister,

what if you patient is your dad?

How are you going to help the patient in that way?

Why touch is important?

Just going into the nitty gritty of the neuro-anatomy.

As you know, we have touch receptors in our body.

These touch receptors take the signal to the area of the brain that is called Insula, right?

And these touch receptors have, one is called as A beta which is myelinated and the other

is a non myelinated fibers which are C fibers they take the sensation to the insula and

it will inhibit and make amygdala, it is the center of fear.

When you touch a patient in a good way.

The context is important.

Good way it stimulates the insula but it inhibits the amygdala the fear goes away.

That is why you should be empathetic, that is why you should use this lucky touch approach.

I have explained this in my book.

Have fun in reading this book.

Thank you.

To purchase Road to USMLE - Step 2 CS book, go to our website, you can also enroll in

a Vital Checklist workshop or invite Dr. Singh to your medical school, residency, fellowship

or hospital to speak.

For all your options, visit VitalChecklist.com

For more infomation >> Formula of Empathy for Patient Experience-USMLE-Step 2 CS Exam - Duration: 3:19.

-------------------------------------------

Facebook is censoring me (Swe W/ Eng subs) - Duration: 13:41.

My Facebook is under attack and might get deleted at any moment.

I've fought to build this site for 2 years, that's how long it took me to get 40'000 followers.

And it's not easy. You gotta try and write a viral post every day, and that requires something.

Unlike others I don't view Facebook as a pathetic status symbol.

There's so many thoughts and events I bring up there that never make it to videos, because it's much faster and comfortable to write.

So my followers enjoy the page a lot, since it's a substantial complementary to my channel.

I use Facebook to share ideas, reveal hypocrisy, and inform about events the media don't report on.

So it's pretty provocative when a bunch of spoiled, white, privileged leftist swedes - who absolutely do not live amongst immigrants - try to take this away from me.

The past weeks SJWs have tried to delete my page, with succesful results. In just 2 weeks I've gotten 5 strikes.

And now my private account is locked for a month, so I can't write any friends or do what you usually do.

So what horrible things did I write for this to happen? Glad you asked.

1st strike was for a post about immigrant gangs who shot fireworks at 4-year old.

And how I think they should be deported because it makes good immigrants look bad. It doesn't have good consequences for those.

I want to differentiate between good immigrants and bad, but Facebook doesn't agree apparently. They seem to prefer viewing all of them as the same.

2nd strike was for a poem, you can read the full thing here, I'll link in the video description, but it contained the word "pussy".

So I guess you can't cuss on Facebook anymore?

3rd strike was for a post about how to beat the PC-establishment, which is by increasing our representation in the culture.

So it's against Facebooks rules to suggest more people should do music and theater.

4th strike was for talking about this unfair treatment, and asking people to like my backup page. I can't even imagine what went wrong here.

I also got a strike for defending Katerina Janouch when the media did a smear campaign against her, and I disproved their lies with sources.

That's not allowed either. Criticising journalists is against the rules too apparently.

What's happened here is that some leftist group gets together and mass-report.

They abuse the sites function, and the site doesn't care.

My posts are getting taken down because FB isn't even reading what they remove. So I'm being punished for their incompetence and pure laziness.

And I'm not the only one. This immigrant, for example, has gotten his account shut down 9 times because he posts reasonable criticism against religion.

Facebook isn't interested in a healthy social debate. The only thing they allow is leftist views and pics of cats.

Yeah, and pics of decapitated heads. That stays up, even when you report, so I suppose the moral of the story here is that I'm worse than torture porn.

These virtue-junkies don't understand the free market of ideas. I'm growing, because people wanna see that. Because they agree with me.

If I'm quiet, they won't stop agreeing, because they're still gonna live in reality with it's related issues.

Concerned citizens aren't gonna stop feeling what they're feeling, just because you refuse to understand what they feel.

Many suggested I should start using more blog more than Facebook, which I will.

But the problem with blogs is that they're harder to follow. You don't get automatic updates, like you do in a Facebook feed.

But I found a simple solution, which more people should use: RSS.

Get this app for your mobile, then input all blogs, podcasts and youtubers you wanna follow.

Then install the plugin for your browser, and you'll get a notification whenever something new is posted.

Which is especially good for YouTube channels, considering the broken sub-box.

Subscribers aren't getting videos, only half my subs get mine, and many lose out on much.

And follow me on Twitter, it's harder to get censored there and I'll link to my blog for longer posts.

I recall getting print screens once, of a FB-group where feminist-leftists talked shit about me.

They were astonished by how "the racist movement got such good presence online. Why are they better at reaching out to people?"

The only explanation given from other users was: "Dumbed down messages appeal to the gullible masses."

It's not about internet presence, and it's not about oversimplified messages.

The regressive left is losing because they hate ordinary people.

You're not reaching ordinary people because you aren't ordinary people, and you don't see yourself in their problems because you're not living their life.

The "problems" you see in society are only pervieced by mentally unstable women, whipped men who want to fuck these women, and the upper class.

You're the only ones with time to spend on non-issues like "hen", cultural appropriation, and sexism where no ordinary person sees sexism.

What you percieve as racists are ordinary people, and they're tired of being shit on for their white skin, and their male sex,

and seeing their country go to hell because you wanna score social brownie points, on a policy you never have to experience the effects of.

And I mean, think about what they've actually done here.

You could've gathered a gang and showered my posts with well-reasoned counter arguments. Statistics and research that proves me wrong.

Bring facts and new perspectives, and try to plant seeds for change.

But instead you just deny other people freedom of speech.

And that's how you know the feminist left are full of shit. If you've thought your opinions through, you're not afraid of having them challenged.

Then you want people to speak freely, and give them the chance to hang themselves with their own words.

So all this talk about "daring to refuse debate" is just about you knowing you haven't thought deeply enough.

There's a FB-group called #JagÄrHär, it was started up by a journalist who used to work for public service and has been celebrated as constructive anti-hate.

But all they really do is spam comment sections with nonsense, so nobody can see what the critics say.

Instead of well-reasoned arguments it's mostly tired clichés. Honestly, these people are complete idiots.

They're not combating hate and threats. When Expressen did an article about how Nordstan has transformed into a multicultural hell,

where immigrants molest girls, rob people, do burglary, threaten shop owners,

#JagÄrHär complained about the headline. And that they even write an article like this, because dats racist.

Then they try to brush off these serious issues by saying "it's always been like this, nothing has changed, and statistics show that crime is actually going down!"

They also say that the criminal gangs deserve sympathy. Despite the fact they turn down help from social services so they can keep being criminals.

And they say that a handful of cops "should be able to handle" being surrounded by 150 angry youths.

I can only interpret this as a gross mockery of the police.

These retarded comments appear many times over, people write the exact same things and drown out the voices of others.

How would this possibly decrease the frustration and polarization in society?

If anything it creates real hate, and not the fake hate they claim to wanna counteract.

Ultimately this is just political advocay from the left.

They did the same thing to the debate on whether we should carry statistics on immigration and crime.

Braindead cliches, spam and no real arguments.

And they won a fucking award for this shit. Because they regularly do this to political opponents.

This is just a few examples I've brought up, there's many more, so check out the Flashback-thread if you wanna see a good review of this group.

Anyway, the groups admin did a post about how to abuse the report function.

She suggests to type in english and threaten that the post which wasn't removed is illegal according to Swedish law.

So it's possible that's what's happened here. But from what I gather, according to my spies, this group has never attacked me.

There's nothing about me in it, and mass reports isn't their main thing. So I don't blame them.

But it wouldn't surprise me if the culprits are loosely inside the group.

And before you ask: No, there's nothing I can do.

SVT even did an article on this, you can't even contact Facebook. They try to be as anonymous as possible.

There's no number or mail you can use to ask why they blocked you, or why pics of cut off heads are fine but not posts about immigration policy.

What's slightly alarming is that these type of groups have aimed for me before, but never succeeded. Now it seems like Facebook has become more sensitive.

And it might be due to the fake news hysteria, which Facebook promised action against.

And a while back our Democracy Minister talked about censoring Facebook to stop fake news.

Don't miss my video on that btw, it's kinda important since source criticism is a much talked about issue.

But what I've experienced here shows what her idea would mean in practice. Disagreeing with someone is the definition of "spreading racist myths" today.

But it's so obvious I'm not gonna quit. I'm not gonna stop expressing myself and using social media.

Because I'm an immigrant and that's just how we view freedom of speech. We think you should use it. Unlike leftist swedes.

So obviously they're just trying to make me annoyed, temporarily, and it's so petty.

The truth always wins in the end, so those who try to manipulate people's access to the truth are automatically on the losing team.

I'm not gonna quit, out of pure principle, and knowing that I piss so many people off is giving me a diamond-hard boner.

The culture war continues, and don't forget: Behind every feminist initiative stands a drunk man.

For more infomation >> Facebook is censoring me (Swe W/ Eng subs) - Duration: 13:41.

-------------------------------------------

Mesothelioma Histology Mesothelioma Cancer Centers - Duration: 2:47.

mesothelioma histology

mesothelioma histology

mesothelioma histology

mesothelioma histology

mesothelioma histology

pleural mesothelioma treatment

mesothelioma cancer centers

mesothelioma cancer centers

mesothelioma cancer centers

mesothelioma histology

mesothelioma histology

mesothelioma histology

mesothelioma histology

For more infomation >> Mesothelioma Histology Mesothelioma Cancer Centers - Duration: 2:47.

-------------------------------------------

What Trump's Wall Says To The World - Duration: 5:39.

What Trump's Wall Says To The World.

by Tyler Durden.

Submitted by Patrick Buchanan via Buchanan.org,

�Something there is that doesn�t love a wall,� wrote poet Robert Frost in the

opening line of �Mending Walls.�

And on the American left there is something like revulsion at the idea of the �beautiful

wall� President Trump intends to build along the 1,900-mile border between the U.S. and

Mexico.

The opposition�s arguments are usually rooted in economics or practicality.

The wall is unnecessary.

It will not stop people from coming illegally.

It costs too much.

Yet something deeper is afoot here.

The idea of a permanent barrier between our countries goes to the heart of the divide

between our two Americas on the most fundamental of questions.

Who are we?

What is a nation?

What does America stand for?

Those desperate to see the wall built, illegal immigration halted, and those here illegally

deported, see the country they grew up in as dying, disappearing, with something strange

and foreign taking its place.

It is not only that illegal migrants take jobs from Americans, that they commit crimes,

or that so many require subsidized food, welfare, housing, education and health care.

It is that they are changing our country.

They are changing who we are.

Two decades ago, the Old Right and the neocons engaged in a ferocious debate over what America

was and is.

Were we from the beginning a new, unique, separate and identifiable people like the

British, French and Germans?

Or was America a new kind of nation, an ideological nation, an invented nation, united by an acceptance

of the ideas and ideals of Jefferson, Madison, Lincoln and Dr. King?

The Old Right contended that America existed even before the Revolution, and that this

new nation, this new people, wrote its own birth certificate, the Constitution.

Before Washington, Madison and Hamilton ever went to Philadelphia, America existed.

What forced the premature birth of the nation � was the Revolution.

We did not become a new nation because we embraced Jefferson�s notion about all men

being �created equal.� We became a new people from our familial break with the Mother

Country, described in the declaration as a severing of ties with our �brethren� across

the sea who no longer deserved our loyalty or love.

The United States came into being in 1789.

The Constitution created the government, the state.

But the country already existed.

When the Irish came in the mid-19th century to escape the famine and the Germans to escape

Bismarck�s Prussia, and the Italians, Jews, Poles, Greeks, Slovaks came to Ellis Island,

they were foreigners who became citizens, and then, after a time, Americans.

Not until decades after the Great Migration of 1890-1920, with the common trials of the

Depression, World War II and Cold War, were we truly forged again into one united nation

and people.

By 1960, almost all of us shared the same heroes and holidays, spoke the same language

and cherished the same culture.

What those with memories of that America see happening today is the disintegration of our

nation of yesterday.

The savagery of our politics, exemplified in the last election, testifies to how Americans

are coming to detest one another as much as the Valley Forge generation came to detest

the British from whom they broke free.

In 1960, we were a Western Christian country.

Ninety percent of our people traced their roots to Europe.

Ninety percent bore some connection to the Christian faith.

To the tens of millions for whom Trump appeals, what the wall represents is our last chance

to preserve that nation and people.

To many on the cosmopolitan left, ethnic or national identity is not only not worth fighting

for, it is not even worth preserving.

It is a form of atavistic tribalism or racism.

The Trump wall then touches on the great struggle of our age.

Given that 80 percent of all people of color vote Democratic, neither the Trump movement

nor the Republican Party can survive the Third Worldization of the United States now written

in the cards.

Moreover, with the disintegration of the nation we are seeing, and with talk of the breakup

of states like Texas and secession of states like California, how do we survive as one

nation and people?

Old Europe never knew mass immigration until the 20th century.

Now, across Europe, center-left and center-right parties are facing massive defections because

they are perceived as incapable of coping with the existential threat of the age � the

overrunning of the continent from Africa and the Middle East.

President Trump�s wall is a statement to the world: This is our country.

We decide who comes here.

And we will defend our borders.

The crisis of our time is not that some Americans are saying this, but that so many are too

paralyzed to say it, or do not care, or embrace what is happening to their country.

For more infomation >> What Trump's Wall Says To The World - Duration: 5:39.

-------------------------------------------

What are you doing now? Present continuous tense - Duration: 0:59.

Oh Alex! You're looking good, are you on a diet?

I watch my weight.

So, you've noticed Alex made a mistake

He said: "I watch my weight"

However, Simple present is for habits

something that is always true

However, here, he should have said:

"I'm watching my weight."

because this is happening now!

Hi, what are you doing?

I check my bank account

Stop! Stop! Stop!

Alex, what did I just tell you?

Do my homework? Nope

Don't lie? Nope

I don't remember, sorry

So, what are you DOING?

Oh! I'm CHECKING my bank account.