Thứ Bảy, 24 tháng 3, 2018

Waching daily Mar 24 2018

What if depression is not an illness? Now, that's a question I hear quite often.

And recently I have heard someone, who I think is a pretty reasonable person, say

that depression is not an illness... And I think that this is what prompted me to

do some googling and see what other people have to say about this. And I've

discovered that there are actually some...

therapists out there who think that depression is not an illness.

And, you know, I've, I've listened to all of their arguments, I've read all of their

arguments, and they seem quite reasonable, but they are also easy to dismantle,

and that's actually what I'm about to do today, so yeah... I guess I just want to

share why I personally think that depression is an illness and why

it should be treated like one. I want to stress... I have to stress at the beginning,

that I am NOT one of the social justice warriors who, you know, get triggered

every single time they hear someone mention the idea that depression, or any

other mental illness, might not actually be an illness. I actually have a list of

arguments that I would like to share and I'm not here to, you know, pointlessly

scream at you. Okay, so let's jump right into it.

First of all, I certainly agree with the fact that any mental illness is not really an

illness in the standard medical definition of the word which is:

a definite pathological process, having a characteristic set of signs and symptoms,

which may affect the whole body or any of its parts and its etiology, pathology

and prognosis may be known or unknown. To make it a bit simpler, what I'm trying to

say is that depression, or any other mental illness,

does not really attack your body or to be more specific, your tissues, the very

same way that, let's say, the flu or cancer would. Now, there are a bunch of

arguments, a bunch of reasons why some people suggest that depression is not an

illness, but it's rather a state of mind, a trait of character, or even worse:

a weakness. So I just want to list all of them and I will, you know,

dismantle all of them one by one. First of all, people suggest that the cause of

mental health problems has not been pinpoint 100% and that the mythical

chemical imbalance has not been fully confirmed. And that is actually true, that

is true. We do not know, we are not sure what exactly is going on in there.

It is very likely that depression stems from influences other than

the neurotransmitter abnormalities, which is the whole serotonin / dopamine thing.

And among these are irregularities in brain structure and function, disturbances in

neural circuitry and various psychological contributions, such as stress.

But I ask: should a really matter? There are other idiopathic diseases,

which basically means that their cause is unknown, yet no one denies the fact that

these are indeed illnesses. There's also a list of illnesses that can be

confirmed... that can be diagnosed only through interviewing the patient, because

there is no way... there are no specific tests that could confirm it, like, you

know, the the restless legs syndrome. But it's still considered an illness.

Number two: some people suggest that medication doesn't work for everyone, so depression

cannot be cured, or at least, it cannot be kept in check and that is why it cannot be an illness.

But I ask, should it really matter. There are many other illnesses

out there for which we don't have treatments that would have a 100%

success rate. Now, chemotherapy doesn't always work,

but, you know, you wouldn't say that cancer is not illness. There are many other

illnesses that cannot be fully cured, we can just try and, you know, control the

the severity of the symptoms. So how is depression any different, again.

And does the fact that not everyone responds well to medicinal treatment...

Does that mean that we should ditch it altogether? You know, surely, you wouldn't

suggest banning chemotherapy just because it doesn't work for everyone.

And last, but not least, the people who suffer from mental disorders,

most of them, lead severely impaired lives... Now, these things can be cured or

at least kept in check. However, these people won't be able to

cope with it unless they seek professional help. Now, that - to me - sounds

like how an average, more conventional disease would work, doesn't it.

When someone breaks a leg, you don't just tell them that if they change their mindset

their bones will instantly heal. When someone is taking insulin shots for

diabetes, you don't ask them whether they aren't scared that the medication will

change them and you don't ask them whether they wouldn't prefer to cope

with it on their own. When someone has the flu,

you don't just tell them to snap out of it and get out of bed. So why would you

say those very same things to people who suffer from mental disorders... And...

Disorders that we know - because it has been scientifically proven and it has

been documented over the years - these disorders will not go away on their own

in most cases. Now, there are people who suggest that depression is not an

illness, it's rather a symptom of our consumer culture, the constant rat race,

the pressure for perfection imposed upon us by the social media. So, I guess the

theory is that people who... who are somehow more emotional, somehow weaker,

they can't take it. They can't take the pressure and as a result they become

depressed. And I say yes this might be one of the many causes of depression, but,

you know, I don't think that it's the illness itself. I don't think

that this is enough to explain the complexity of depression.

Because what about the people who are clinically depressed for no apparent reason?

What about the people who actually won the rat race, what about the the people

who are successful, who are rich, who have it all, who are, you know, considered

attractive or whatever, but they are still depressed. And last but not least:

what about all of the people who are overly emotional, who are very responsive

to what goes on in the world, who care too much, but yet, they are not depressed.

Take me for example. It's a little bit weird to talk about

myself this way, but I am the so-called highly sensitive person. I am very

emotional, although I don't really show it on the surface, but, you know, I think

a lot, I dwell on things inside... And yeah, I guess I just, you know, I have

heightened empathy, which - I think - is what allows me to make those videos, to make

them so relatable, at least according to you, I don't know... But yeah, and, you know,

my life hasn't been that easy, to be quite honest, especially for the past... for

the past couple of months and somehow... I'm not depressed. I'm not.

I never was and, you know, I don't feel like I'm about to be. So I think what I want

to say is that, you know, it's it's not a general rule, it's... it's not enough,

the theory that people that are somehow more emotional, are more prone to

depression. I don't think that's enough to explain it. I really don't want

to go overboard with this so let me just stress that I think that the feelings of

depression, anxiety, stress or any other unpleasant emotions, they are a part of

the human condition, they are normal, they are natural. I don't think that these

should be labeled as something bad, as something that is unwanted. I don't think

that we should, you know, strive to fully erase these because that would be absurd,

that would be like, like a real life version of a Brave New World, which is

something I really don't want to happen. So... Also, I believe that getting rid of

depression or any other mental illness is in the hands of the person who

suffers from the disorder, because that's actually what a lot of therapy is about.

And, most importantly, I don't think that simply popping a pill every single time

is the right way to go. I don't think that overmedicalizing this issue is

the one and only and the right solution to this. However, there are times when

people cannot cope on their own. They need the help of medication, they need

the help of therapy. Sometimes, and I think that actually most times, a mix of

these two things works best. So as you can tell I'm trying to find a middle

ground here, basically... having a discussion with myself. But yeah, and to

all of the people who suggest that there was no depression in the good old times:

I just want to say that Mount Everest wasn't discovered and named by the West

until the 1850s and I'm pretty sure the mountain still existed, okay?

So to sum up, what I want to say is that I personally don't really care whether mental

illnesses are called illnesses, because I know what they are, I know how they

should be treated I know how they work. But there are a lot of people out there

who don't know how these work, there are many misconceptions about mental

disorders. And I do believe that labeling mental disorders as illnesses has taken

so much of the stigma away, which obviously is a good thing. And I guess,

that being stubborn and just arguing that these are not illnesses, just

because they don't exactly fit the biological definition of the word

illness, won't do any good. It can only do harm, because it basically, it opens up

doors for all of the people who think that it's just a weakness, it's just a

trait of character, it's laziness, and, you know, saying that it's not an illness

basically... takes us back to medieval times and we don't want that.

Every time we suggest that it's not an illness, I think we further stigmatize it.

I think we somehow suggest that people who suffer from these disorders, they are

somehow weaker, that they cannot cope with it on their own. And some people

even romanticize depression and, you know, they say that sadness is a good

thing in this empty world and that we should all feel more sadness and that...

Depression should be somehow nurtured, which is such a ridiculous idea. What I

think is worst about this is that when you say that it's not an illness...

When you say that, you imply that people who suffer from

these disorders should actually be able to cope with them on their own. And when

it turns out that not everyone can cope with it on their own, these people become

ashamed. And when people become ashamed, they refuse to seek help.

And what happens when people refuse to seek help? They often attempt a suicide.

Now, there's no hidden agenda in this for me. I'm not a psychiatrist, I'm not

psychologist, I am not in any way linked to the pharmaceutical industry.

I'm not even depressed and I never was depressed. So you may be wondering why

I am so passionate about this and, you know, first of all I just guess I like to

discuss various interesting ideas, various interesting topics, but I think

that the main reason why I took my understanding of the mental health

issues... of the mental health case, what took it to another level was me being

diagnosed with social anxiety and me opening up to the world about it.

So, you know, when I did it, when I finally had the guts to admit it, to admit that I was

struggling with mental health issues, I was somehow denied - by some people -

- the right to suffer from a mental disorder. No matter how hard I tried to

explain that I've been diagnosed both by a psychiatrist and a psychologist,

and I actually, you know, took medication for a while, for a very brief while actually...

No matter how hard I try to explain that I actually went to therapy for a year,

every single week. No matter how hard I tried to explain that maintaining a high

functioning persona online, although I wouldn't really call myself high

functioning, as I think you can clearly tell, but yeah maintaining an online

persona in the comfort of your home, where you can edit out all of

the mistakes, where you can put a filter on or whatever, it's not the same as

what you would act like around people in in real life. Even though I tried to

explain all of these things, people still had the nerve to say that I am somehow

making it up or doing this just to get attention, because clearly, for these

people, these two things don't work. Being online and having social anxiety. These

things don't work. So I guess this left me a little bit broken and very much

disappointed. Because not only did the mental illness itself mess up my life.

But, you know, the people, the society, when I finally, you know, opened up about it,

they didn't just accept it, they, you know... Some people just questioned it at every

single opportunity they got. And I guess I just hope that when my children are

around, and when they need any mental health help (I hope they don't, but if

they do) I hope they will instantly get it without having to get humiliated

along the way, the way many of us were. And I guess I just hope that in the

future, people will get help before it's too late.

So yeah, thank you so much for watching and I will see you in my next video. Bye!

For more infomation >> what if depression is not an illness? - Duration: 16:57.

-------------------------------------------

Who is Dana Loesch? Conservative Commentator & NRA Spokesperson | NowThis - Duration: 9:36.

What rights do women not have

that men have?

None of them have been able to answer that question.

That's Dana Loesch.

radio host, author, blogger,

See this feather? I'm also half eagle.

"conservative alternative to old dudes,"

and spokesperson for the National Rifle Association.

Loesch was born in 1978 to Southern-Baptist democrats

in a small Missouri town about 40 miles from St. Louis,

where her grandfather taught her how to shoot BB guns in their backyard,

and her parents owned rifles.

Oh and I love the way it smells, ahh a newly manufactured firearm.

When is Yankee going to make this?

When is this going to be a candle?

She attended St. Louis community college at Meramec

before transferring to Webster University to study journalism.

They also did it with Sarah Palin and the whole

'I can see Russia from my house,'

which by the way she never ever ever said.

They're our next door neighbors,

and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska.

She dropped out after getting pregnant with her soon-to-be husband, Chris,

a Republican, and former frontman of a local punk band.

Although Chris now manages Dana's career,

I'm the man behind the woman that...

is probably more of a man than a lot of men.

the two used to argue constantly about politics—

until Dana switched sides.

Her views started to change after Bill Clinton's extramarital affair

and then she came to her "Jesus moment" in the wake of the 9/11 tragedy.

Long before peddling guns,

Loesch peddled another plague among America's youth:

the Twilight series.

In 2004, she started a "mommy-blog" called "Mamalogues".

Hey ladies, it's Dana Loesch with Mamalogues.com.

Loesch penned a piece nearly every day,

giving her growing audience a behind the scenes look into her life as a mother.

She wrote about everything from the pros and cons of plastic surgery,

to how great "Twilight" is in a piece called,

Try to figure that one out.

I walked into Target, bought some laundry detergent, tampons, Twilight,

and Chef Boyardee ravioli for the boys.

Her blog picked up so much steam,

she was given a column in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch in 2006.

In 2007, she recalled how small people used to be.

And years before she took on teens who had just survived a mass shooting,

she took on a sandwich.

In 2008, after she finished her ass sandwich,

Loesch began hosting her own radio show,

"The Dana Show," from KFTK-FM in St. Louis.

The program consisted of guest segments and long rants espoused by Dana.

Like sticking up for a bakery owner who called terrorists "ragheads" at a rally.

Loesch defended him, saying,

With her rise in fame, came loads of hate mail—

Loesch began to view the world through a lense of violence and paranoia.

Soon after, she took self-defense classes and purchased multiple weapons,

including the one she had right next to her son's toy gun.

Yeah, we have 80 million gun owners.

You know, the first problem that I see is that ABC producers

irresponsibly conclude that we have an epidemic of accidental shootings involving children,

because these producers placed guns around play areas and *gasp* children looked at them.

In 2010, she joined Breitbart's crack editorial team.

Founder of the site, Andrew Breitbart said,

At Breitbart, she penned numerous articles,

six of which were about Chick-fil-A.

She also wrote an article defending Paul Ryan

from Rage Against the Machine guitarist, Tom Morello.

After Morello found out Ryan was a huge fan,

he said,

Loesch, apparently at this point, an expert in rap metal, came to Ryan's defense,

The following year, in 2011,

Loesch was hired by CNN as a political analyst.

But they distanced themselves from her after she defended a group of marines

who urinated on dead Taliban soldiers.

And things over at Breitbart weren't going much better.

In 2012 after Andrew Breitbart died,

Loesch's relationship with the site and its new executive chair, Steve Bannon,

reportedly went "tragically awry".

She ended up suing Breitbart, seeking release from her contract

and at least $75,000 in damages.

The case was dismissed.

In 2014, Loesch packed up and moved to Dallas to work for Glenn Beck's 'TheBlaze',

another conservative news network.

She used her platform to go after anything from the comedy show, "Inside Amy Schumer,"

to reading her hate mail in Batman villain Bane's voice.

He tweets, quote—I'm going to use my Bane voice because I'm under the weather and it sounds awesome.

*Extremely Bane Voice* Awful, awful people…@DLoesch goes on Fox and lies about Hillary Clinton's concussion.

The hate, I make the hate work for me—I don't get intimidated, I just get even.

It's punk rock conservatism, I want to have fun with it,

I want to be fist in the air.

You can have a good time and kick some butt, they're not mutually exclusive.

But what apparently is mutually exclusive is mental health and guns.

In the aftermath of the Parkland school shooting,

during which 17 people were killed, Loesch was the NRA's messenger.

And she threw all of the blame off of guns and on to mental illness,

calling the shooter "nuts" and "an insane monster."

I don't believe that this insane monster should have ever been able to obtain a firearm.

But just a few years before, Loesch tweeted,

Loesch took over as spokesperson for the NRA in 2017.

She first sparked outrage shortly after she joined the association.

NRA TV released a video where Loesch attacked the New York Times

in a way that both parties feared could encourage violence.

We're going to fisk the New York Times and find out just what deep rich means to this old grey hag,

this untrustworthy, dishonest rag that has subsisted on the welfare of mediocrity for 1, 2, 3 more decades.

We're going to laser focus on your so called 'honest pursuit of truth.'

In short, we're coming for you.

She later claimed the media loves mass shootings.

Many in legacy media love mass shootings.

You guys love it.

Now, I'm not saying that you love the tragedy,

but I am saying that you love the ratings.

Crying white mothers are ratings gold.

She'd also love to see members of the media get "curb-stomped,"

a violent move made popular by a white supremacist

in the movie 'American History'.

I'm happy just frankly to see 'em curb-stomped, let's be real about it, Grant.

These people are just the worst thing that could ever possibly happen to the American political system-

with the way they cover so many things.

I have so many things that I hate about mainstream media,

there is no way we are going to fit it in the allotted time today,

they are the rat bastards of the earth.

Loesch and the NRA have not backed down from their firm positions

on opposing expanded background checks, and upping the age limit.

Until they do, at least we have their thoughts and prayers.

It's horrible—I don't know what else I can say about it except please pray for those who have been affected.

The families, the children who have went through this and now are going to

have a lifetime to figure out, 'what did I just witness? What Just happened to me?'

For more infomation >> Who is Dana Loesch? Conservative Commentator & NRA Spokesperson | NowThis - Duration: 9:36.

-------------------------------------------

ONE DOWN 💀 ITS PAYDAY TIME - BAD STYLES IS BACK - Duration: 1:30:40.

For more infomation >> ONE DOWN 💀 ITS PAYDAY TIME - BAD STYLES IS BACK - Duration: 1:30:40.

-------------------------------------------

Cardfight!! Vanguard: What is Engorge? [ ENG SUB ] - Duration: 2:16.

*MUSIC*

Welcome my Brozilla to a new video.

My name is Venotrax and today we get to the bottom of the word "engorge".

Engorge belongs to the clan Tachikaze.

Tachikaze is by the way my favourite clan, but what means engorge?

Engorge stands literally for something like "eaten" or "be eaten".

That means, if a unit with engorge attack, you can retire at least one unit to cause this status.

You can also tribute several units, to say it in Yu-Gi-Oh! language, because sometimes you active skills of other units, because they got retired.

They are two kinds of engorge-cards.

There are cards like [Gaia Emperor] that need only one unit to become engorged.

And there are also cards like, the best example [Absolute Ruler, Gluttony Dogma].

To use him to the fullest you need at least five units that can be retired.

This status stays until the end of your turn, so you have enough possibilities.

In this case also exists "Effect Use Timing" or the timing when you can use the skill.

The first one is "When this unit becomes engorged...".

This sentence just say this card switches from not engorged to engorged.

So you got one of your unit retired and your card becomes engorged, this is the timing to activate the skill.

The second one is "If this unit is engorged...".

That refers to your Vanguard is being engorged and you can activate this skill immediately, because it is active for the rest of this turn.

And this is engorge.

If you like what you saw, write a comment down below.

DESTROY the like button.

Maybe you can leave a suggestion for the next keyword that I should explain.

Good night and good battle, your Venotrax. *Editor's Note: Well, it makes more sense in german.*

For more infomation >> Cardfight!! Vanguard: What is Engorge? [ ENG SUB ] - Duration: 2:16.

-------------------------------------------

Kids' Choice Awards🏆 2018 is TONIGHT! at 8/7c Hosted by John Cena Ft. N.E.R.D, Zendaya & More | Nick - Duration: 1:06.

The Kids' Choice Awards are tonight!

And amazing things are happening!

N.E.R.D is performing their dance sensation "Lemon".

And JoJo Siwa will bring the house down!

I've literally been rehearsing 24/7 for my performance

and I literally like, cannot wait for you guys to see it.

The stars are gonna be shining, you'll see!

Channing Tatum, Hailee Steinfeld, Kristen Bell, Laurie Hernandez,

Yara Shahidi, Alex Wassabi, Miranda Sings, LaurDIY,

Liza Koshy, Camila Cabello, Jace Norman, Kira Kosarin,

Lizzy Greene, Jack Griffo, Kel Mitchell and Zendaya.

Plus, you can literally help decide what happens in the show

with live voting!

And before the show, get ready right here

with a live stream from the orange carpet!

Hosted by Daniella Monet.

She'll be talking with your favorite stars,

taking on some challenges and more!

See you tonight.

For more infomation >> Kids' Choice Awards🏆 2018 is TONIGHT! at 8/7c Hosted by John Cena Ft. N.E.R.D, Zendaya & More | Nick - Duration: 1:06.

-------------------------------------------

'March for Our Lives' is the latest movement led by young people - Duration: 4:01.

For more infomation >> 'March for Our Lives' is the latest movement led by young people - Duration: 4:01.

-------------------------------------------

Witte vlekken op de huid: wat is de oorzaak? - Duration: 7:38.

For more infomation >> Witte vlekken op de huid: wat is de oorzaak? - Duration: 7:38.

-------------------------------------------

Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Handling Review & Full HD samples - Duration: 4:19.

Build quality is average

Zoom ring turns quite jerky

There is a 24mm position lock

On the Canon EOS 6D Mark II camera

Autofocus is quick and quiet thanks to the STM AF system

Manual focus ring with electronic control is very responsive

Zoom is not very smooth

Lens flares are usually not a big problem. On the other hand, ghosting is

STM provides quick, smooth and quite focusing

If you focus on large distances (several meters), bokeh can be nervous

Optical stabilization system is OK, I have measured almost 3EV performance (when taking stills)

1/200 s, F13, ISO 100, 24 mm

1/500 s, F3.5, ISO 100, 24 mm

1/30 s, F3.5, ISO 1250, 24 mm, +0.3 EV

1/320 s, F7.1, ISO 640, 105 mm, -0.3 EV

1/200 s, F13, ISO 100, 24 mm, +0.3 EV

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét