Thứ Hai, 6 tháng 8, 2018

Waching daily Aug 6 2018

PLEASE LIKE, SHARE, SUBCRIBE video! Thanks you very much!

So you want to try that again with less hitting me in the face this time

Well, it would have worked if your movements weren't so erratic and formless. So it was all my fault. Oh

You totally weren't even trying to sink with my dancing. You should know how I danced by now stop

Come on guys, please. Stop fighting if you can't get along with each other

I might never get to see your awesome fusion power

Oh

Do you know who I am?

All you wanna do is see me turn into

The heaven beetle, I don't have it

You got distracted hey you were the one getting carried away with all those fancy

Backflips. Wait a sec. I've got the beetle

Good job Steven, I

Also see you helped your teammates views

And all I had to do was get eaten by a bird nice work you'll be great at fusing one day

You

Ah

Take that Wow amethyst. I'm impressed

Now, what's your move pearl Steven are the water balloons really necessary

Yeah destroyed the moves really matter, but it's checkers every single move matters. It sounds like someone's being a sore loser

For more infomation >> Steven Universe Giant Woman #3 Top Cartoon For Kids Episode 38 - Louie Rowe - Duration: 3:59.

-------------------------------------------

Jake And The Never Land Pirates Memorable Moments Cartoon For Kids Part 1214 - Kiara Alice - Duration: 3:59.

PLEASE LIKE, SHARE, SUBCRIBE video! Thanks you very much!

Me me big man

The flower we won't be able to change the baby's back

We stop little hook from wrecking the grandfather gladiola

Not so fast get these first

We have to gather up the flowers pollen and sprinkle it on you so you can grow up again

Okay babies it's time to make the change

We're big again

Mateys it sure was fun being babies today, but thanks for helping us grow up. Now. Let's put all our gold doubloons

I mean doubloons into our team treasure chest

Well done crew what to do

Come on count with us

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 9

Yoho, we got nine gold doubloons today

and we got gold balloons -

You mean gold doubloons cubby, nope

Oh

What an

exhausting day

Bill a nice nappy will do you a world of good?

nighty-night captain

Feel 90 night captain gutt sleeping

God is real why the reservation

We're kicking about history

For more infomation >> Jake And The Never Land Pirates Memorable Moments Cartoon For Kids Part 1214 - Kiara Alice - Duration: 3:59.

-------------------------------------------

Ohio special election poses major test for Trump - Duration: 14:13.

Democrats looking for a shocking underdog when in a special election in

Ohio on Tuesday are hoping not only to snatch a House seat in a historically

Republican district but also to energize their national effort to fight president

Trump's agenda and reclaim a congressional majority Ohio's 12th

congressional district in the suburbs of Columbus has had a Republican

representative for 35 years and has been largely in GOP hands since 1920 but a

poll released Monday by Monmouth University shows that Republican state

senator Troy bounder s'en 56 leads upstart

challenger Danny O'Connor 31 by just one percentage point Trump who in the

wealthy and highly educated districts by double digits in 2016 went all-in for

Baldur soon with a last minute rally on Saturday night in the sweltering

auditorium that Trump said hit 110 degrees ruining his brand-new beautiful

suit former President Obama took the district by several percentage points in

2008 a vote for Danny Boy and the Democrats is a vote to let criminals and

drugs pour into our country Trump said and to let ms-13 run wild in our

communities and you know what they do once they're there the president went on

to describe O'Connor as a puppet for House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi

Democrat California O'Connor once vowed not to vote for Bella c2 again lead the

party but later backtracked saying he would support the 78 year old if it was

necessary to retake the house Trump also defiantly questioned the idea that

historically the party that controls the White House suffers significant losses

in the midterms declaring but I say why Baldur so narrowly won the Republican

primary for the seat earlier this year amid a crowded field

and campaigned largely as a loyal supporter he said he would help build

Trump's wall and defend Christian values in an advertisement Ohio gov John Kasich

who often has criticized Trump since running against him for the GOP

presidential nomination also has endorsed Baldur s'en saying he is a

partner in turning around Ohio as we passed tax cuts and balance the budgets

it's really kind of shocking because this should be just a slam dunk for

Republicans and it's not Kasich said on ABC News this week on Sunday adding that

he believed Bal derson would win but it really doesn't bode well for the

Republican Party because this shouldn't even be contested Kasich said Bal derson

has other high profile Republican support Rep Jim Jordan Republican Ohio

also briefly took the stage during the rally at the request of the president

and was met with chants from the crowd supporting him for the House speakership

top Republicans hope the Baldur since support from both moderates like Kasich

and avowed Trump supporters in Washington would draw a large diverse

crowd of supporters to the polls on Tuesday Baldur Stan himself touted his

array of endorsements telling reporters this week he had unified the Republican

Party the August 7 special election to replace retired rep patty Barry will be

seen as a bellwether for the upcoming midterms in November and a clear

referendum on Trump and Republican leaders including Jordan a Quinnipiac

University poll found that Democrats have opened a 12-point lead on the

generic house ballot a gap that Republicans had almost closed just a few

months ago several other states will hold primaries on Tuesday but Ohio's

special election promises to be the last major partisan test ahead of the

November midterms the array of midterm season nomination contests has proven

confusing even for Washington insiders Trump last week erroneously told voters

in Ohio to get out and vote for Rep Steve Stivers who already

had won the GOP nomination for his house seat earlier this year he later deleted

the tweet and posted his endorsement of bounder said the first real fair that I

ever went to was with governor Mike Huckabee we want a bring him in now he's

the Fox News contributor of course and former governor of Arkansas remembers

this Huckabee on TV n I don't know if you remember this but you are in charge

of the Governors Association and it was the first time that I met you and your

family we all flew out I believe it was in Arkansas and you hosted a mini State

Fair do you remember this yes I do Abby and I remember that your dad and I and

Iowa played with REO Speedwagon because your dad is an amazing keyboard player

and I'm a mediocre bass player but I remember and I will tell you to this day

the best state Food Fair that I've ever had is pork chop on a stick at the Iowa

State Fair normally you go to these things and you just take a bite for the

cameras and then you kind of pass it on and you know that's it one bite I took

one bite of that it was so good and they started to take it away from me

I say touch me and I kill you really good I can attest to that the governor

is telling the truth in people line up just to get that Iowa State Fair pork

chop it is a serious thing and people also line up governors for these big

rallies that we are seeing the president do he is really getting the gear getting

us all in gear for the midterms he was in Tampa earlier in Pennsylvania last

night in Ohio and he really takes the time governor to remind his base why

they voted for him why he is the person that is fighting for the things that

they are care most about and that is this country he also talked about

predicting a red wave he said we hear so much about a blue wave coming and this

is why I think we're gonna see a red wave here's a bit of what he said last

night oh I guess we don't have that sup but and you were watching we were all

watching a governor what were the highlights for you you know I think what

Donald Trump is doing and he's doing it so effectively it's reminding people

that if you want to give up your crumbs your bonuses your pay increases if you

want to go back to an economy that no longer is chugging along with 4.1

percent GDP growth and go back to an anemic

just struggling economy vote for the Democrats if you want a government that

moves us more toward socialism more toward the idea of you working hard and

then giving it to somebody who didn't work as hard as you do vote for the

Democrats because that's what we're looking at if you want a nation in a

world it's not as safe that hates cops that wants to surrender and bow down to

foreign leaders vote for the Democrats and and I don't know of anything that

the president could do more effectively than what he's doing and that's going

out there and it drives the media people nuts it drives the elitist living in the

bubbles of New York Hollywood and DC nuts but it's rallying the people and

reminding them why he won overwhelmingly in November of 2016 and governor the

presidents out there rallying for also troy ball derson running against the

democrat danny o'connor do you feel like he's gonna have an impact there I think

he has an impact everywhere he puts his endorsement because it calls attention

now it doesn't mean that when you do an endorsement that it automatically causes

people to vote for somebody but maybe a person that just wasn't on the radar of

a lot of voters suddenly they say if Donald Trump is for this person maybe I

should be too and we've seen the influence in in key races Martha Roby

and Alabama comes to mind there's some other races where I think he's played a

significant role in boosting the candidate and giving them to push over

the finish line absolutely well the one of the things

the president spoke about last night was the fake news media he's tweeting about

it again this morning and part of the reason he talks about it is because they

failed to tell the whole story or they tell one side of the story and then

pretend like it's unbiased one example of that is the New York Times which the

president calls the failing New York Times and there was an op-ed in there

that caught our eye it talked about the children at Trump rallies it said what

is it like to see young people exposed to so much anger heartbreaking says a

Times photographer so he's positing that these kids at the rally that go with

their parents they're being there they're in a bad spot but you've you've

had kids go to present plenty of rallies what does it do - how does it affect

kids Donald Trump rallies are incredibly patriotic they're uplifting but let me

ask you something have you ever been to an Arkansas LSU game

you want to see some tension you want to see something you might want to keep

your kids away from that ought to do it but let me ask you this why don't we

take our kids to something more calm like a Maxine Waters speech that ought

to really be something that puts you in a soothing mood I mean good heavens the

New York Times is embarrassing itself they just hired a racist sexist cop

hating person to be on their editorial board and they even have the audacity to

defend it for them to come out and try to say anything negative about the tone

of Donald Trump is absolutely laughable they are making a joke of themselves and

I didn't think they could do a better job of doing that they'd already have

done governor the battle between the president of media it seems to only get

hotter and hotter and he and he slams and every time you he points back

because he knows they're standing right there and they can't respond obviously

but he continues to call them the enemy of the people he calls them disgusting

calls him out by name do you think this is helpful in the long run or as he give

is he making them the story well they should never be the story I mean

personally I would prefer that he spends more time ignoring them because I don't

think they matter that much to the average American voter and I think he's

got a distinguish the fact that not all the press or the enemy of the people a

free responsible press is the best thing we have in a democracy it's critical to

our survival but the other side of that coin the press needs to act with some

level of responsibility and when you have showboaters like the guy on CNN who

enjoys becoming the story let me tell you something

whenever a journalist becomes part of the story it's no longer a news story

now it is an editorial story because the best journalists are the ones who simply

give you the facts and they really are not part of the story at all their views

their opinions their biases are subjugated to the facts themselves and

let the reader or the viewer make the decision that's not happening very much

anywhere in journalism today and that kind of journalism is the enemy of real

freedom and liberty and for people to think yes and that's what he's pointing

out he's simply pointing out that that's it's been a double standard for a long

time and I'm be able to expose it to you now another hallmark of the left has

been the use of identity politics and and you

of race and gender and sexual orientation as the way of classifying

someone well Kemal Harris who we all know is on the

20/20 list potentially for Democrats the senator from California she took that

head-on and we want to get you react listen with that phrase identity

politics that phrase is used to divide and it is used to distract it is used to

try and shut us up these issues that they're trying to diminish and demean

are the very issues that will define our identity as Americans so those issues

are what define our identity as Americans in Kamala Harris's world and

in the world of most of the leftist Democrats we have the clearest example

of the difference between a conservative and a liberal and here it is

conservatives believe that our basic form as a nation is built around

individual liberty that I'm personally free and I'm personally responsible for

my freedom liberals believe that my freedom is tied to whatever group I'm in

whether it's my gender whether it's my race whether it's my socio-economic

standing and then I got to stay in my group and if my whole group does in

advance I can't advance because it's about the

group not the individual if you want to know the difference between the left and

the right there it is do you believe in individual liberty individual

responsibility or do you believe that we're part of groupthink and if you

think that it's all about the groups and you stay in your Corral and don't leave

until the whole herd of sheep go out well first of all you're a liberal

secondly I hope you like where your herd is because you're not getting out I'm

grateful to live in a country that let me get out of some of the Corral's that

I was put in as a child you know in terms of poverty terms of never thinking

I'd go 50 miles from my home but I grew up believing that in America you can do

anything be anything if you were willing to work hard get an education and not go

around calling yourself a victim thank God I live in America and I'll be

grateful every day for the extraordinary privilege of being individually free

well said well said in Thank You governor because now I'm hungry for that

pork chop on a stick having flashbacks to the fair we went to with REO

Speedwagon I was a backup singer singing go Johnny go go remember that the other

thing I gotta remind you of tom vilsack playing the spoons governor of Iowa

great guy and a good friend of ours but Tom you know they he was the host

governor so they got him up on the stage and he didn't really play an instrument

but he played the spoons and I felt bad for him the next day because the Des

Moines paper excoriated him for saying yet Huckabee on base yet Huntsman on

keyboard and then we had our governor playing this was a good sport that is a

great story governor great to have

For more infomation >> Ohio special election poses major test for Trump - Duration: 14:13.

-------------------------------------------

Jogless Back Loop Only Round for Amigurumi (left-handed version) - Duration: 2:13.

For more infomation >> Jogless Back Loop Only Round for Amigurumi (left-handed version) - Duration: 2:13.

-------------------------------------------

Little Singham - Drawing for children - flowers world(19). - Duration: 3:54.

Thank you for watching the video

For more infomation >> Little Singham - Drawing for children - flowers world(19). - Duration: 3:54.

-------------------------------------------

Sequels Fans Begged For But Got Nothing - Duration: 6:17.

Sequels are big business in Hollywood, but not every fan favorite has gotten a follow

up film, despite the money-making opportunities in play.

"Merchandising."

"Merchandising, what's that?"

"Merchandising."

When it comes to these films, the creatives involved have often hyped up potential sequels,

but fans have been left disappointed time and again by everything from endless delays

to downright project abandonment.

Here are a few sequels that we're still waiting for.

District 9

Director Neill Blomkamp's 2009 film District 9 offers up a great blend of science fiction,

action, and horror, presented with a unique premise that echoes the real-life events of

apartheid South Africa.

The film chronicles an alternate history in which an alien ship appears over Johannesburg,

and the insect-like aliens within the ship are eventually relocated to a government camp

on the edge of town.

Twenty-eight years later, one alien attempts to escape with his son and return to their

home planet.

The film earned heaps of praise, four Academy award nominations and was a runaway box office

success.

Since its release, Blomkamp has been promising fans that a sequel to District 9 would be

forthcoming, and in 2010, lead actor Sharlto Copley hinted that the second shoot was about

two years down the road.

Despite this promise, no sequel has ever materialized, as Blomkamp's schedule has been tied up with

other projects.

Dredd

Comic character Judge Dredd first hit the big screen in 1995 with Sylvester Stallone

starring in the title role.

The movie was a critical and commercial flop, however, so director Pete Travis tried again

with a complete reboot in 2012's Dredd, which featured Karl Urban in the lead.

Unfortunately, although his film earned praise from fans and critics, it failed to make a

profit at the box office.

Dredd did find new life following its home release, however, and the film has since become

a cult favorite.

Producer Alex Garland has suggested that a potential TV series might be a better idea

than a cinematic sequel, considering the film's lackluster ticket take.

And after a viral push for it to happen, a new series called Judge Dredd: Mega-City One

was announced in early 2017, with reports indicating Urban may be in discussions to

reprise his role for the show.

Since then, however, most news about the series has been little more than speculation or rumors,

and it has yet to find a home, let alone begin production.

Elf

The heartwarming holiday film Elf was an instant success upon release in 2003 and has since

joined the pantheon of "classic" Holiday films thanks to its wholesome humor and catchy characters.

Naturally, many fans would love to see an Elf sequel that covers Buddy's next stage

in life, and it's not the studio executives that have been holding back such a project.

Instead, the main detractors are actually director Jon Favreau and star Will Ferrell.

For his part, Favreau has been generally noncommittal, but Ferrell has been downright negative about

the idea.

"I don't think either of us are on that side of ever wanting to rush into a sequel of things

that we really care about."

In other words, Elf fans shouldn't ask Santa for a sequel any time soon.

Hocus Pocus

Director Kenny Ortega's 1993 horror comedy Hocus Pocus reigns as one of the most popular

Halloween-themed movies of all time.

Starring Bette Midler, Kathy Najimy, and Sarah Jessica Parker, Hocus Pocus received negative

reviews and only earned a small profit at the box office.

Nevertheless, the film went on to become a cult classic, with an extremely dedicated

fan following through DVD sales and television broadcasts.

Fans have been begging for a sequel featuring the Sanderson Sisters for years, and the cast

has been ready for some time, as well.

In late 2017, screenwriter Mick Garris let slip that he was working on a script for Hocus

Pocus 2, but Disney let fans down when they revealed the truth: the new project is a remake

to be aired on the Disney Channel, and neither the director nor the original stars will be

involved.

"Goodbye, cruel world…"

"Bye bye, cruel world."

In fact, Midler has publicly raised doubts about the project, predicting it will look

cheap, so it looks like fans may have to be satisfied with her breaking out the costume

from time to time.

Kill Bill: Volume 2

Although Beatrix Kiddo's bloody tale of revenge came to a close in 2004's Kill Bill: Volume

2, parts of her story were definitely left open-ended.

Some wondered what might happen when Vernita Green's daughter Nikki grows up and wants

revenge …

"If you still feel raw about it…

I'll be waiting."

Plus, who knows what the future holds for little BB?

Writer-director Quentin Tarantino said back in 2004 that he wanted to make another sequel

to his martial arts drama franchise and that he even had the basic story arc of the next

film planned already.

He later said that Kill Bill Volume 3 would be his ninth film, to be released in 2014,

but the project was later shelved, with The Hateful Eight taking its place on his production

schedule.

In 2016, the director was still talking about making a Kill Bill sequel and revealed he'd

spoken to Uma Thurman about the project.

However, the conversation faded away again as Tarantino began production on his next

film, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.

Spaceballs

While spoofs are a dime a dozen, few have been as popular as Mel Brooks' 1987 comic

science-fiction movie Spaceballs.

Starring Bill Pullman, John Candy, Daphne Zuniga, and Rick Moranis, Spaceballs went

on to become a cult classic and remains one of Brooks' most popular movies to-date.

"How many ---holes we got on this ship anyhow?"

Eager fans have been waiting for years for a Spaceballs sequel to make its way to the

big screen.

In fact, the wait has been a bit of a tease as Brooks has promised and failed to deliver

Spaceballs II on several occasions.

In 2013, Rick Moranis revealed that he had discussed a possible Spaceballs sequel with

Brooks, but that they were unable to reach a deal on the project.

Then in 2015, Brooks revived fan interest in the sequel when he said the new Star Wars

trilogy made now a perfect time to create Spaceballs II, and in 2017, Brooks said he

was in talks with MGM about developing the sequel.

Unfortunately, there's been no news since then, and the only time Moranis has suited

back up in his black suit was for an episode of The Goldbergs.

For more infomation >> Sequels Fans Begged For But Got Nothing - Duration: 6:17.

-------------------------------------------

2Minutes2Virtue: Food for the Soul - Duration: 2:32.

Hello, I'm Father William Saunders Pastor of Our Lady of Hope Catholic Church

in Potomac Falls, Virginia

This Sunday, we start a four-week journey

through the sixth chapter of St. John's Gospel

The Bread of Life discourse

Remember last Sunday, Jesus multiplied the loaves and the fishes

feeding thousands

Some of that crowd has now followed Him

They're seeking Him

The challenge for us though is "Who are they seeking?"

Are they seeking someone who did something spectacular?

Are they seeking someone who can fill their stomachs?

Someone who can tickle their ears?

as Saint Paul would say

This question comes up and Our Lord says

You aren't seeking me because you've seen the signs

but because your stomachs are full

Jesus says, "Look for the one who's performed the sign"

meaning the miracle

He wants them to be fed with faith and with Himself

He identifies Himself as the Living Bread come down from Heaven

He is the Lord, the Savior, the Messiah

the Son of God who's come to give us life

He calls them to believe

So, my brothers and sisters when you go to Mass this Sunday

Who are you seeking?

Are you seeking someone who will entertain?

Someone who can do something spectacular?

Someone who might tickle your ears?

Or are you seeking the Son of God: the Lord, the Savior, the Messiah?

Take time this week to go to your parish church

if they have a day of Exposition and Adoration as we do here

Take that time

Spend 15 minutes at least in adoration

or if not at least go to the church

Gaze at the tabernacle

Look to Jesus

Ask Him to come into your life

He is the Bread of Life that sustains us

And we can truly say

"Sacred Heart of Jesus, may You be praised, adored and loved in the Holy Eucharist."

and allow Our Lord to truly come into your life and worship Him as that Lord and Savior

For more infomation >> 2Minutes2Virtue: Food for the Soul - Duration: 2:32.

-------------------------------------------

Jogless Back Loop Only Round for Amigurumi (right-handed version) - Duration: 2:13.

For more infomation >> Jogless Back Loop Only Round for Amigurumi (right-handed version) - Duration: 2:13.

-------------------------------------------

Smoke Expected To Choke Valley For Much Of The Week - Duration: 1:22.

For more infomation >> Smoke Expected To Choke Valley For Much Of The Week - Duration: 1:22.

-------------------------------------------

Back to school hacks for students - Duration: 4:12.

For more infomation >> Back to school hacks for students - Duration: 4:12.

-------------------------------------------

Self checking for skin cancer - Duration: 2:04.

For more infomation >> Self checking for skin cancer - Duration: 2:04.

-------------------------------------------

Watch that funny russian song! 😊 Creative commons music for videos 😊 Share it! :-) - Duration: 1:41.

Funny russian song for you! This is nice creative commons music for videos.

For more infomation >> Watch that funny russian song! 😊 Creative commons music for videos 😊 Share it! :-) - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

Part 1 - Healthy Living for Life - Why Vanishing Diseases Are Making a Comeback - Duration: 8:14.

- [Narrator] Living longer living healthier living better than ever before.

Welcome to Mountain Pacific's Healthy Living for Life, a weekly series that gives you the

information, education and expert insight you need to become an active participant in

today's ever-changing healthcare climate.

Here now is today's program host.

- Diseases we thought were gone, mostly gone or under control by vaccinations are making

a comeback.

Over the past decade, vaccine-preventable diseases have gained a new foothold, posing

a threat to our country's population health.

Welcome to Healthy Living for Life, a show dedicated to helping you do just that.

I'm your host Sara Medley.

Today we talk about the effects of the anti-vaccination movement.

Stay with us, we'll be right back.

- Welcome back.

Though vaccination has led to a dramatic drop in cases of certain contagious diseases in

this country, vaccine-preventable infections are still a threat to us and our communities.

Joining us this morning is Dr. Greg Holzman and Stacey Anderson from the Montana Department

of Health and Human Services.

Thank you both for being with us.

- Thank you.

- Thank you.

- I'm gonna start with you, Dr. Holzman, can you tell our viewers about your credentials?

What kind of a physician are you?

- I hope a good one, but I'll add in the credentials I have is I've actually done two residencies.

I'm boarded in two areas.

One is in family medicine and one is in preventive medicine, which is a lot of public health

and got my master's in public health through that residency program also.

- [Sara] Excellent.

How long have you been in Montana?

- This time around it's just about three years.

My first job out of residency for my family medicine residency was actually on the Blackfeet

Indian Reservation and that was the first time I'd ever touched foot in Montana.

- Excellent, thank you.

How about you, Stacey?

Talk about your background.

- So I have a background in microbiology, which is contagious disease and the study

of those diseases and then I have a master's in public health as well, from Westminster

College in Utah, and I've been in this position for about seven years now.

- Excellent.

Alright, now I'm gonna switch back to you and ask you to talk about vaccinations and

why are they so important?

- You know a lot of times when I talk about those, I like to talk about the history, because

it's just so amazing when you look at this and I can give you a lot of numbers.

Let's use measles as an example.

If you look at measles, the number of cases in the United States before the measles vaccine

was about four million a year, and then the measles vaccine came around in 1963.

Or if you look worldwide, it was estimated that there was about 2.6 million deaths a

year from measles prior to that vaccine.

Sadly, that vaccine has not gotten all around the world and we haven't gotten the immunizations

as well as we want, but the deaths from measles has decreased quite a bit and it's down at

80,000 to 90,000 a year, so still a lot, but it kind of lets us also here in the United

States, where we rarely see measles cases, just understand that this is a serious disease.

And I could give those kind of statistics for all sorts of different diseases and what

a difference vaccines have made in that.

What I would say is, seeing the decrease that has happened, I often like to tell stories

along with it because the numbers sometimes get hard to understand when you're talking

these kind of things and I think that often times my grandparents who were born 1890,

my grandmother was born and my grandfather was born, grandfather and grandmother on the

other side in 1908 and 1905.

Their average life expectancy at that time was 47 years.

That was at the turn of last century, going into the 20th century.

By the time we got to 2000, the average life expectancy in the United States was 78.1 years.

You have this huge increase and you think about well that's because all these things

that happened in medicine.

We got antibiotics, we can do better surgeries, we have insulin now that wasn't around beforehand,

but actually when you look at the data and everything, about 25 of those years are due

to public health.

And the CDC put out this great, CDC is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,

put out this great tribute at the end of last century called The 10 Greatest Public Health

Interventions in the Last Century that had the effect on that and vaccines is one of

those.

It's a big one in there.

There's things from workforce, decreased workforce injuries and deaths and the numbers are very

inspiring to see what a difference that made.

Vaccines are probably, two things, one is the control of infections disease that we

got much better at trying to decrease infection, like with refrigeration and just proper handwashing,

pasteurization, how many deaths happened from outbreaks from unpasteurized milk prior to

that.

These type of things going on and then to get the immune system to get your own body

to fight a disease before you ever get exposed to it and that's where we see some great changes

with vaccines and you see things where you see numbers of measles cases decrease by 99

percent or even something in my lifetime has been haemophilus influenzae vaccination that

has gone down, a 99 percent of decrease in those infections or some diseases that we

don't see anymore at all in the world, like small pox, or even in the United States like

polio and hopefully gettin' close to eradicating that in the world, but still struggling with

a few countries where it shows up.

So made a huge difference and I could go on and on on that.

- That is amazing.

Well, let's switch to Stacey and Stacey, can you talk about how vaccines changed the landscape

for communicable diseases in Montana?

- Sure, so a good example to kind of take from what Dr. Holzman was saying is looking

at mumps.

Mumps is one of those communicable diseases that is currently protected by the MMR vaccine.

Measles is one of the other components.

Mumps is generally sort of a, or was considered a childhood disease.

It's usually pretty self-limited in that you recover fairly easily but can have some side

effects and some consequences including things like deafness and inflammation of the brain,

very rare, but it can happen.

Prior to the introduction or the recommendation to give that dose of MMR against mumps, we

would see hundreds and hundreds of cases in Montana and then within the first few years

after that first dose was recommended, the number of cases dramatically fell.

And then once the recommendation was given to add a second dose of MMR for all kids,

it even fell even smaller.

We have very few cases since then, pretty much sporadic activity.

Every once in a while, you'll see an uptick of these things, but generally speaking, it's

had a significant impact in the number of cases that we've seen in Montana in the intervening

years.

Another example that Dr. Holzman mentioned was haemophilus influenzae.

This is another bacterial disease that affects babies.

Since the introduction of that vaccine, we've seen very, very few cases so it's been a positive

impact.

- Oh, that's wonderful.

Great, well, we need to pause here and take a quick break, but coming up next, how did

the anti-vaccination movement start and are there really risks associated with the MMR

vaccine?

We'll talk about that and much more right after these messages.

Stay with us.

For more infomation >> Part 1 - Healthy Living for Life - Why Vanishing Diseases Are Making a Comeback - Duration: 8:14.

-------------------------------------------

單元1 咱來去食飯 Let's all go for lunch 台華英第一人稱複數代名詞 first person plural pronouns (20170706hmq) - Duration: 14:47.

To start off

We know that pronouns in English use different "function words"to differentiate singular from plural (except 2nd person).

"I → we,he → they".

What about Mandarin?

After singular forms, it adds the auxiliary word -men to indicate plural.

We can also call it a suffix.

"wo → wo-men,ni → ni-men,ta → ta-men"

What about Taiwanese?

Hard to tell from its written Chinese form.

But looking at the romanization, it's clear it adds the suffix -n to the singular forms.

"gua → guan,li → lin,i → in"

From these three languages

we see personal pronouns have two ways by which they become plural:

(1) Use different function words.

(2) Add suffixes.

But did you know?

The 1st person plural pronoun in Taiwanese has two forms! They are guan and lan.

So today we'll be comparing the 1st person plural pronouns in Mandarin, Taiwanese and English.

"First person plural pronouns"

Let's look at a conversation in English between three friends.

Adam says "I'm going for lunch"

Cathy (who's with Betty) replies "We're going for lunch too".

And so Betty suggests "Let us all go for lunch".

How would Betty's suggestion "Let us all go for lunch" be expressed in Mandarin?

Typically we'll say "wo-men yi-qi qu chi-fan".

But what about Taiwanese?

Do we say "guan tso-hue khi tsiah png"? Or "lan tso-hue khi tsiah png"?

Be careful! Here we can't say"guan tso-hue khi tsiah png".

If Betty said this

She means she only wants to have lunch with Cathy, not including Adam.

To include Adam, Betty must say "lan tso-hue khi tsiah png".

Why is this? They are all 1st person plural pronouns.

English uses "us", Mandarin uses "wo-men"

yet in Taiwanese we have to use lan instead of guan.

What are the differences between lan and guan? We'll explain shortly.

Here's another conversation in Taiwanese.

It's between Doctor Wang and a 70-years-old Mrs. Lin.

"Mrs. Lin, let me tell you about the heart problem (you have).

Typically speaking, guan can try medicine or surgery.

But since guan are 70 years old now

a surgery might be too much for guan body.

So guan recommend trying medicine first.

I know you may worry too much medicine is bad for health

but it's OK, guan will carefully adjust the dose.

Guan will work together to overcome this unstable heartbeat problem."

Dr. Wang wanted to let Mrs. Lin understand his suggestions.

But Mrs. Lin only became more and more puzzled!

"Why would a doctor who looked so young and healthy be 70 years old and unfit for surgery?

Is it the doctor or I who should take the medicine?

I'm so confused!"

The root of these misunderstandings

comes from the doctor's less-than-proficient Taiwanese

as well as a unique trait in the pronouns of Taiwanese.

As mentioned,

in Taiwanese there are two 1st person plural pronouns

guan and lan.

guan is also known as gun

Guan is the plural suffix n added to gua (1st person singular)

and refers to the speaker and those beside him

but does not include the listener.

We can view it as an "exclusive we".

In contrast, lan includes the listener,

and can be viewed as an "inclusive we".

Here

We can think of lan (inclusive we) as a word that combines li (meaning you) with guan (exclusive we).

When these two words combine

it leaves only the initial and final sounds, forming lan.

By now we understand that in Taiwanese there are two types of 1st person plural pronouns

the listener-excluding guan

and the listener-including lan.

That is, an "exclusive we" and an "inclusive we"

but in Mandarin and English there is only one form.

So in Mandarin

the conversation between the doctor and the patient would be:

"Mrs. Lin, let me tell you about the heart problem (you have).

Typically speaking, wo-men can try medicine or surgery.

But since wo-men are 70 years old now,

a surgery might be too much for wo-men body.

So wo-men recommend trying medicine first.

I know you may worry that too much medicine is bad for health

but it's OK, wo-men will carefully adjust the dose.

Wo-men will work together to overcome this unstable heartbeat problem."

Now we put the Mandarin wo-men in three colors.

The wo-men in green are the "exclusive we".

For example "So we recommend" means "So our medical team recommend".

And for example "We will carefully adjust the dose" means "Our medical team will carefully adjust the dose".

Both of the green wo-men here do not include Mrs. Lin.

The wo-men in purple are the "inclusive we".

So "We will work together to overcome" means the medical team and Mrs. Lin will overcome her problems together.

The wo-men in blue are also the "inclusive we"

but are used as euphemism.

When the doctor describes negative things

the original subject is Mrs. Lin.

For example "You (Mrs. Lin) can try medicine or surgery"

or "You (Mrs. Lin) are 70 years old now"

or "Surgery might be too much for your (Mrs. Lin's) body".

By using the Mandarin wo-men,

the doctor adds himself to the subject.

So the sentences become

"People (with this problem) can try medicine or surgery"

"Surgery might be too much for people who are 70 years old."

These blue wo-men

encompass the doctor, the patient, and everyone else.

In other words, they convey the idea that these misfortunes are something everyone faces

and the doctor stands in solidarity with the patient.

In this conversation

the blue and purple wo-men, both "inclusive we"

are used when the doctor describes negative things or situations.

Linguists call this communication technique "medical plural"

meaning the doctor and patient are "in the same boat" or "in this together".

However,

in Mandarin, both the inclusive- and exclusive-we

use the exact same wo-men.

It's the same situation in English.

"We" is used whether it includes or excludes the listener.

"Mrs. Lin, let me tell you about this heart problem (you have).

Typically speaking, we can try medicine or surgery.

But since we are 70 years old now

a surgery might be too much for our body.

So, we recommend that we try medicine first.

I know that you might be worried about taking too much medicine

but it's OK, we will carefully adjust the dose.

We will work together to overcome this unstable heartbeat problem."

The green "we" is the listener-excluding we.

As in "we (the medical professional) will recommend…"

"We (the medical team) will adjust the dose."

The purple "we" is the listener-including "we".

As in "we (the medical professional and Mrs. Lin) will work together".

Notice here we can also use the objective case "Let us".

"Let us work together".

"Let us" always includes the listener.

The blue "we" not only includes the listener

but is also a communication technique.

Through the use of "we", English-speaking doctors can convey that the doctor and patient are "in the same boat" or "in this together".

However, just like Mandarin

in English both inclusive and exclusive use the exact same "we".

But Taiwanese is different!

Let's look at the conversation between three friends.

Cathy says "We are going for lunch too"

or in Mandarin "wo-men ye-yao qu chi-fan".

Here the English "we"and the Mandarin wo-men

refers to Cathy and her friend Betty.

That is, an exclusive we, not including Adam.

Later, when Betty invites Adam to have lunch together

the same "we" and wo-men can be used.

Because these two terms can also mean inclusive we.

"Let us all go for lunch."

"We will all go for lunch."

"wo-men ye-yao qu chi-fan".

But in Taiwanese there's a clear distinction between the inclusive and exclusive we.

So the Taiwanese conversation becomes

Adam: "gua beh khi tsiah png"

Cathy: "guan ma beh khi tsiah png"

Betty: "lan tso-hue khi tsiah png".

By now, we understand that 1st person plural pronouns in both Mandarin and English share the same form for both the "inclusive and exclusive case".

But in Taiwanese they are distinct, guan and lan.

Therefore those used to speaking Mandarin or English

often carry over this habit even when speaking Taiwanese

using guan for both exclusive and inclusive cases

resulting in comedies or misunderstandings.

Let's look at the conversation between the doctor and Mrs. Lin.

The doctor says

"guan e kian-gi kong sing tsiah io-a tsiah khuann-mai a" (we recommend trying medicine first)

"guan e ho-ho ka li tiau-tsing" (we will carefully adjust the dose).

Because the doctor meant "we the medical team"

so using the listener-excluding guan is the correct choice.

The doctor then says

"guan tso-hue lai phah-piann" (we will overcome this together).

Because the doctor meant "I the doctor and the patient will overcome this together"

so he should've used the listener-including lan.

"lan tso-hue lai phah-piann".

Furthermore, when the doctor talked about three negative things or situations

he again used the exclusive guan as if he's cursing himself!

No wonder Mrs. Lin got confused.

When referring to bad things,

the doctor should use the inclusive lan,

to convey solidarity and that he stands with the patient.

"Mrs. Lin, let me tell you about the heart problem (you have).

Typically speaking, lan can try medicine or surgery.

But since lan are 70 years old now

a surgery might be too much for lan body.

So guan recommend trying medicine first.

I know you may worry that too much medicine is bad for health

but it's OK, guan will carefully adjust the dose.

Lan will work together to overcome this unstable heartbeat problem."

For more infomation >> 單元1 咱來去食飯 Let's all go for lunch 台華英第一人稱複數代名詞 first person plural pronouns (20170706hmq) - Duration: 14:47.

-------------------------------------------

Are Term Limits For Congress Unconstitutional? - Duration: 3:37.

I want to take a question from Twitter right now.

If you have a question, you can send to us using the hashtag: #AskROF.

This one came in a couple days ago.

It's actually directly pointed at something I have addressed in the past, which is my

support for term limits for members of Congress.

Here's the question.

It comes from Daniel Pareja, @nobthehobbit.

It says, "#AskROF, you say you support term limits, @farronbalanced, and haven't heard

a good argument against them.

But what about the fact that they're inherently anti-democratic?

They literally prevent voters from electing the person of their choice if that person

has served too long.

By that logic, using the exact same argument that you are using, presidential term limits

would be deemed un-democratic.

If you wanted to vote for somebody that had already served two full terms, you couldn't.

So no.

I don't buy that argument either.

I appreciate you taking the time to ask it.

I understand what you're trying to do here, but again, I don't find that to be a good

argument.

We have a government system set up in such a way that we do not have kings or queens.

Anyone who can wield too much power over the entire country.

Checks and balances, I believe it's called, and when you have someone who serves for,

I don't know, 30 years in the Senate like John McCain, 25 years in the House, 24, 20?

That person gains so much power that they basically become an unstoppable force with

unstoppable influence over Congress, and over the President of the United States, and being

there for so long, they get to direct people because of all the power they amass over time.

That is how it works.

You amass more power over time.

You also end up with control over who gets placed in the judiciary.

So, some of these people that have been there for so long, they have almost absolute power.

It doesn't matter who the President is.

It doesn't matter which party controls the chamber.

And that's the problem.

When you have somebody that's been in DC for 20, 30 years; they know all the lobbyists.

They know who they work for, they know their family histories, they become good buddies

with them.

They lose track, and this is the most important part; of what's happening back home, what's

happening outside that DC bubble, because they only make occasional trips to do some

campaigning or to go on vacation.

They're not back home, living.

But if we were to take people, average people, and give them a shot ... And also, for the

record, it basically makes them unbeatable in any re-election that they come up to, right?

Somebody who's been there for 30 years, very unlikely that they're just going to get voted

out.

It does happen.

Very unlikely, again.

So they have absolute power.

They lose track of what average Americans are going through.

They spend all their time in the DC bubble, hobnobbing with the lobbyists and all the

rich folk, and they forget.

We need to make it more representative.

Switch people out, get people with different life experiences.

That is why I support term limits.

Thank you for your question.

We'll be right back.

For more infomation >> Are Term Limits For Congress Unconstitutional? - Duration: 3:37.

-------------------------------------------

Amazing New Tiny Home for sale in 2445 S Huckleberry Ct Heber City, UT 84032 - Duration: 3:31.

Amazing New Tiny Home for sale in 2445 S Huckleberry Ct Heber City, UT 84032

For more infomation >> Amazing New Tiny Home for sale in 2445 S Huckleberry Ct Heber City, UT 84032 - Duration: 3:31.

-------------------------------------------

Healthy Living for Life - Why Vanishing Diseases Are Making a Comeback (Full Version) - Duration: 23:01.

- [Narrator] Living longer living healthier living better than ever before.

Welcome to Mountain-Pacific's Healthy Living for Life, a weekly series that gives you the

information, education and expert insight you need to become an active participant in

today's ever-changing health care climate.

Here now is today's program host.

- Diseases we thought were gone, mostly gone or under control by vaccinations are making

a comeback.

Over the past decade, vaccine-preventable diseases have gained a new foothold, posing

a threat to our country's population health.

Welcome to Healthy Living for Life, a show dedicated to helping you do just that.

I'm your host Sara Medley.

Today we talk about the effects of the anti-vaccination movement.

Stay with us, we'll be right back.

- Welcome back.

Though vaccination has led to a dramatic drop in cases of certain contagious diseases in

this country, vaccine-preventable infections are still a threat to us and our communities.

Joining us this morning is Dr. Greg Holzman and Stacey Anderson from the Montana Department

of Health and Human Services.

Thank you both for being with us.

- Thank you.

- Thank you.

- I'm gonna start with you, Dr. Holzman, can you tell our viewers about your credentials?

What kind of a physician are you?

- I hope a good one, but I'll add in the credentials I have is I've actually done two residencies.

I'm boarded in two areas.

One is in family medicine and one is in preventive medicine, which is a lot of public health

and got my master's in public health through that residency program also.

- [Sara] Excellent.

How long have you been in Montana?

- This time around it's just about three years.

My first job out of residency for my family medicine residency was actually on the Blackfeet

Indian Reservation and that was the first time I'd ever touched foot in Montana.

- Excellent, thank you.

How about you, Stacey?

Talk about your background.

- So I have a background in microbiology, which is contagious disease and the study

of those diseases and then I have a master's in public health as well, from Westminster

College in Utah, and I've been in this position for about seven years now.

- Excellent.

Alright, now I'm gonna switch back to you and ask you to talk about vaccinations and

why are they so important?

- You know a lot of times when I talk about those, I like to talk about the history, because

it's just so amazing when you look at this and I can give you a lot of numbers.

Let's use measles as an example.

If you look at measles, the number of cases in the United States before the measles vaccine

was about four million a year, and then the measles vaccine came around in 1963.

Or if you look worldwide, it was estimated that there was about 2.6 million deaths a

year from measles prior to that vaccine.

Sadly, that vaccine has not gotten all around the world and we haven't gotten the immunizations

as well as we want, but the deaths from measles has decreased quite a bit and it's down at

80,000 to 90,000 a year, so still a lot, but it kind of lets us also here in the United

States, where we rarely see measles cases, just understand that this is a serious disease.

And I could give those kind of statistics for all sorts of different diseases and what

a difference vaccines have made in that.

What I would say is, seeing the decrease that has happened, I often like to tell stories

along with it because the numbers sometimes get hard to understand when you're talking

these kind of things and I think that often times my grandparents who were born 1890,

my grandmother was born and my grandfather was born, grandfather and grandmother on the

other side in 1908 and 1905.

Their average life expectancy at that time was 47 years.

That was at the turn of last century, going into the 20th century.

By the time we got to 2000, the average life expectancy in the United States was 78.1 years.

You have this huge increase and you think about well that's because all these things

that happened in medicine.

We got antibiotics, we can do better surgeries, we have insulin now that wasn't around beforehand,

but actually when you look at the data and everything, about 25 of those years are due

to public health.

And the CDC put out this great, CDC is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,

put out this great tribute at the end of last century called The 10 Greatest Public Health

Interventions in the Last Century that had the effect on that and vaccines is one of

those.

It's a big one in there.

There's things from workforce, decreased workforce injuries and deaths and the numbers are very

inspiring to see what a difference that made.

Vaccines are probably, two things, one is the control of infections disease that we

got much better at trying to decrease infection, like with refrigeration and just proper handwashing,

pasteurization, how many deaths happened from outbreaks from unpasteurized milk prior to

that.

These type of things going on and then to get the immune system to get your own body

to fight a disease before you ever get exposed to it and that's where we see some great changes

with vaccines and you see things where you see numbers of measles cases decrease by 99

percent or even something in my lifetime has been haemophilus influenzae vaccination that

has gone down, a 99 percent of decrease in those infections or some diseases that we

don't see anymore at all in the world, like small pox, or even in the United States like

polio and hopefully gettin' close to eradicating that in the world, but still struggling with

a few countries where it shows up.

So made a huge difference and I could go on and on on that.

- That is amazing.

Well, let's switch to Stacey and Stacey, can you talk about how vaccines changed the landscape

for communicable diseases in Montana?

- Sure, so a good example to kind of take from what Dr. Holzman was saying is looking

at mumps.

Mumps is one of those communicable diseases that is currently protected by the MMR vaccine.

Measles is one of the other components.

Mumps is generally sort of a, or was considered a childhood disease.

It's usually pretty self-limited in that you recover fairly easily but can have some side

effects and some consequences including things like deafness and inflammation of the brain,

very rare, but it can happen.

Prior to the introduction or the recommendation to give that dose of MMR against mumps, we

would see hundreds and hundreds of cases in Montana and then within the first few years

after that first dose was recommended, the number of cases dramatically fell.

And then once the recommendation was given to add a second dose of MMR for all kids,

it even fell even smaller.

We have very few cases since then, pretty much sporadic activity.

Every once in a while, you'll see an uptick of these things, but generally speaking, it's

had a significant impact in the number of cases that we've seen in Montana in the intervening

years.

Another example that Dr. Holzman mentioned was haemophilus influenzae.

This is another bacterial disease that affects babies.

Since the introduction of that vaccine, we've seen very, very few cases so it's been a positive

impact.

- Oh, that's wonderful.

Great, well, we need to pause here and take a quick break, but coming up next, how did

the anti-vaccination movement start and are there really risks associated with the MMR

vaccine?

We'll talk about that and much more right after these messages.

Stay with us.

- Welcome back.

In the late 1990s, a study linked childhood vaccinations to autism.

Even though an investigation into the study proved the findings wrong and even though

the doctor who led the study had his license revoked for serious professional misconduct,

the study planted seeds of fear and set off an anti-vaccination movement.

Dr. Holzman and Stacey Anderson from the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services

are still with us.

So, we're back.

- Yeah.

- [Sara] Gonna go to you, Dr. Holzman.

Let's talk about that anti-vaccination movement.

If vaccinations are so effective, why do people resist getting them?

- Yeah, it's interesting.

Since the first vaccine came about, which is actually 1797 was when the small pox vaccine

was first figured out, there's always been an anti-vaccine movement and that has gone

on, we just recently did work on the pandemic flu of 1918-1919 here in Montana and during

that aside thing, we saw that there was a big uproar about small pox vaccine in Butte,

Montana, of a group of people that went to the board of health.

It said no they had to get their vaccines.

It went all the way to the state board that supported them and the vaccines were given.

This issue has already gone all the way to the Supreme Court in 1905 about individual

liberties versus community protection and again, vaccines were supported in that ruling

of Jacobson versus Massachusetts.

So I think the issue is that's been around but I think the point even more that we need

to demystify in the myth is that it's big because if you look at a Pew survey that was

done in 2017 showed that 88 percent of Americans believe that vaccines are safe and the benefits

highly outweigh the risk to get vaccinated.

If we look at our own data in Montana that we'll see in many of our areas, polio vaccine

in kids about 88 percent.

We see things, you know, these areas that we see this constant increase in the numbers

of people getting vaccinated, so there is a small percentage and there's different reasons

that people choose not to get vaccinated or delay vaccinations, but overall, the movement

is actually fairly small and most people see and look at the data to say, "This is a good

thing."

- So let's switch to you, Stacey.

And tell us about that Wakefield study from the 1990s.

You know, why did it cause so much concern about the MMR vaccine?

- So the issue with the Wakefield study was Dr. Wakefield and some of his co-authors did

this study that was looking at young children who were developing signs of autism around

the same time that they were given their first dose of the MMR vaccine.

And so, you know, in science, one of the things that we have to look at is you can make a

connection like that, but can you truly establish what's called a causal relationship, meaning

does that event truly cause the outcome?

And the problem with that study is that that was the conclusion that Wakefield wanted to

draw, that people who were getting MMR vaccine were developing autism.

And in fact, that was incorrect, and as you said earlier, that study was eventually revoked,

it was reviewed, found to be that some of that data for that study was not only a very

small number of individuals, which is very hard to study.

You need larger samples, basically, to study something well, but also the data was falsified

and future studies could never reproduce that same result.

In fact, future studies have shown that there is no link between the MMR vaccine and the

development of autism and so as you mentioned, Dr. Wakefield lost his license, the study

was pulled back and discredited.

I'm here to say there is no link, there is no link between receiving an MMR and the development

of autism in the scientific body of knowledge.

- So to follow up on that, he was discredited, the study was discredited, yet there are still

naysayers who are not vaccinating, so why would that be all these years later?

- Well, it did take some time for that study to be discredited.

There was quite a period of years between the study's results and the following retraction

of the study.

That resulted in a lot of discussions with people talking about how these were definitely

connected and of course if you're a parent and you're seeing this happen, you know, it's

scary.

You wanna know why your child developed these symptoms and you wanna make sure you educate

people around you as to well, this is what happens, so I don't want it to happen to you.

A lot of that kind of continued on until the study was officially retracted and then sometimes

it's hard to change those modes of thinking all these years later.

- I think there's some other aspects that I would add onto what Stacey talks about here

is the sense that one, autism is scary and we're seeing it go up in numbers and we wanna

understand why.

I think it's sad that we continue to pay so much time in trying to revoke this kind of

going over and over again on that where we should be putting it towards trying to understand

autism and see if there's ways we could do better on prevention and better treatments

of that.

The other thing that I think, social media probably has an effect, too.

I mean we all go to the sources that we feel best and so sometimes we will go to a source

that I use the word "data" and I use that loosely that we have the data that supports

our pre-held belief instead of being able to continually to look at the bigger picture

and look at the other side's viewpoints to come to those answers.

- So we've got about 30 seconds left and in that time period, can you briefly describe

the types of people that shouldn't get vaccinations?

Who are they?

- It's very minimal, but there are sometimes that you'll find a medical reason not to get

vaccinations.

Just to give you an idea, in Montana, about point four percent of children have a medical

reason and that might be because of an allergy that they have to a component within the vaccine

or it might be that they have a decreased immune system or reasons that they can't get

a specific vaccine.

Sometimes it's so that they can't one or two different vaccines, but they can get the others,

so talk to your provider and go through that.

- We need to pause here and take a quick break, but coming up next we'll talk more about the

impact the anti-vaccination movement is having on public health and what's being done to

overcome it.

Don't go away.

- Welcome back.

The anti-vaccination movement is playing a big role in the resurgence of diseases that

can be prevented by vaccines.

Dr. Holzman and Stacey Anderson are still with us.

That's great.

So I'm gonna go to you, Dr. Holzman.

We talked about vaccine hesitancy before the break.

How do you move forward with messaging to really get more people to immunize?

- I like that you used the word hesitancy 'cause sometimes they put 'em all into this

anti-vaccine movement and a lot of it is hesitancy.

There's a great article in the Atlantic by Julie Beck and I've stolen from her, but I

think she really does it well to categorize us into four different types of people.

One, she talks about the complacent.

We don't see the diseases around us all the time anymore so we're not always in a hurry.

We're not against the vaccine by any means, but it's like, you know, I can't to the doctors

this week to get, I'll get it next week and you know it just gets put off and so there's

that delay and delay and delay and so we see people miss opportunities to get vaccinated

and be up to date with their vaccines and see this with children too.

The other one would be the inaccessible and I think that happens in some of the areas

that this group goes to where it might be a long drive to get to a provider that can

give the vaccine or the cost and stuff like that.

The ACA has helped with that, the Affordable Care Act, but that's another reason that people

might not get vaccines, so we need to encourage the importance of that and also give them

ways to try to decrease those obstacles.

This next person would be the ones that are real contemplative, I mean, they are the ones

that have calculated everything.

We call them the calculators.

They've sat down and go, "Well, we haven't seen polio" "in this country in a long time."

"So while there's very, very little risk," "I think I will not get my kid vaccinated"

"because everybody else is vaccinated around them."

The wrong problem is that too many people start doing that, these diseases are appearing

right away and then we do have these problems.

The last one is the group that's just completely unconfident.

They might be not trust government, they might not trust doctors, they might not trust the

pharmaceutical companies or whatever.

Those people are really gonna be hard to switch over and I will still talk with them and give

them my information and listen to them with respect when they come in, but I realize the

chances that they're gonna change over is probably very little unless sadly one of their

children gets the disease, which we highly hope doesn't ever happen or the other area

is their friends and families around them really convince them and that does make a

difference, people that they have built trust with and hearing it from them so it's good

for people that even believe in vaccines to talk about the importance to those around

them.

- So clearly the need for multiple messaging.

- Multiple messaging and a lot of listening, respecting what other people have to say,

too.

- Absolutely.

So I'm gonna turn to Stacey.

You both work for the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, we know

that, and I understand that there is a rather famous individual from Montana who's responsible

for a lot of what we see positive about vaccines, so Stacey, tell us about Dr. Maurice Hilleman.

- Right, so Dr. Maurice Hilleman actually is a native of Mile City, Montana, which not

too many folks know about you know when we learn about the history of vaccines, he's

not one of the names that usually pops up, but he has contributed to the development

as well as the safety and efficacy studies of more than 40 vaccines in his career and

has been credited with saving millions of children's lives.

His body of work has been very powerful and very positive for vaccinations.

An interesting story about him is that he was one of the folks that worked on the MMR

vaccine for measles, mumps and rubella.

His daughter came down with the mumps and he was a scientist working in a lab and so

he took a swab of his daughter's cheek and then grew up the mumps virus that she was

infected with and used that virus to improve the preparation of the MMR vaccine and that

strain is called the Jeryl Lynn strain and it's still in the vaccine that we use today

to protect our children.

And to even make it more of an interesting story, years later, his younger daughter was

one of the first kiddos that was inoculated using this new preparation of the vaccine

and there's an iconic photo out there of the two siblings helping each other through that

process of getting vaccinated.

So we credit him with the positive things that have happened to protect kids against

these diseases that were terrible many, many years ago.

- Another example of a Montanan making a big difference

- absolutely.

- in healthcare, right?

- Yes.

- Let's switch to Dr. Holzman.

So really interesting history, but let's talk about the future.

What does the future hold for vaccinations for all of us?

- Yeah, I'd love to see some more studies and some more vaccines come about because

I think they're huge successes.

But we're seeing things with new diseases.

They confirmed we now have an Ebola vaccine that's going through trials at this point

in time, but they're actually using it right now in the Congo with an outbreak that's going

on there.

Hopefully someday we'll get an HIV vaccine, so there's these infections.

We now have therapeutic vaccines.

This is a little bit different.

So the first vaccine that came out like that was the hepatitis B vaccine.

This is a vaccine going at a virus, but we know that virus has a big effect on having

things like liver cancer so trying to prevent that or HPV trying to prevent cervical cancer,

penile cancer and other issues there, so we have that aspect coming about.

The other thing that we've seen a lot with is some work and I think Stacey and I would

both love to see this is a universal flu vaccine so we don't have to try to guess what's coming

next year and put the strains in there, but finding an antigen aspect on that that we

could give once or once with a booster and then you'd be covered for flu for the rest

of your life.

And then the last thing I think is some of the new areas of how do we give those vaccines.

We have oral vaccines, we have nasal vaccines, but the newest one that's coming about is

what we call microneedles and it's like a little stamp with the antigens on it and they

just push it on there and then they pull back and the antigens stay there and all the sudden,

you start to get a response to that, so wouldn't that be great not to see your child be screaming

when getting those shots and being able to feel that way, so that'd be awesome.

- I will look forward to that day for sure.

Thank you both so much for being with us today.

And thank you for watching.

Be sure to join us again next week.

Until then, stay fit, stay well and stay healthy for life with Healthy Living for Life.

Take care.

- [Announcer] Healthy Living for Life is brought to you by Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.

We'd love to hear from you.

If you have suggestions for future programs, visit our website at mpqhf.org or call us

at 406-443-4020.

You can also catch us on YouTube by visiting our website and clicking on the YouTube icon.

Special thanks to Fire Tower Coffee House and Roasters.

Production facilities provided by Video Express Productions.

For more infomation >> Healthy Living for Life - Why Vanishing Diseases Are Making a Comeback (Full Version) - Duration: 23:01.

-------------------------------------------

Part 2 - Healthy Living for Life - Why Vanishing Diseases Are Making a Comeback - Duration: 7:08.

- Welcome back.

In the late 1990s, a study linked childhood vaccinations to autism.

Even though an investigation into the study proved the findings wrong and even though

the doctor who led the study had his license revoked for serious professional misconduct,

the study planted seeds of fear and set off an anti-vaccination movement.

Dr. Holzman and Stacey Anderson from the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services

are still with us.

So, we're back.

- Yeah.

- [Sara] Gonna go to you, Dr. Holzman.

Let's talk about that anti-vaccination movement.

If vaccinations are so effective, why do people resist getting them?

- Yeah, it's interesting.

Since the first vaccine came about, which is actually 1797 was when the small pox vaccine

was first figured out, there's always been an anti-vaccine movement and that has gone

on, we just recently did work on the pandemic flu of 1918-1919 here in Montana and during

that aside thing, we saw that there was a big uproar about small pox vaccine in Butte,

Montana, of a group of people that went to the board of health.

It said no they had to get their vaccines.

It went all the way to the state board that supported them and the vaccines were given.

This issue has already gone all the way to the Supreme Court in 1905 about individual

liberties versus community protection and again, vaccines were supported in that ruling

of Jacobson versus Massachusetts.

So I think the issue is that's been around but I think the point even more that we need

to demystify in the myth is that it's big because if you look at a Pew survey that was

done in 2017 showed that 88 percent of Americans believe that vaccines are safe and the benefits

highly outweigh the risk to get vaccinated.

If we look at our own data in Montana that we'll see in many of our areas, polio vaccine

in kids about 88 percent.

We see things, you know, these areas that we see this constant increase in the numbers

of people getting vaccinated, so there is a small percentage and there's different reasons

that people choose not to get vaccinated or delay vaccinations, but overall, the movement

is actually fairly small and most people see and look at the data to say, "This is a good

thing."

- So let's switch to you, Stacey.

And tell us about that Wakefield study from the 1990s.

You know, why did it cause so much concern about the MMR vaccine?

- So the issue with the Wakefield study was Dr. Wakefield and some of his co-authors did

this study that was looking at young children who were developing signs of autism around

the same time that they were given their first dose of the MMR vaccine.

And so, you know, in science, one of the things that we have to look at is you can make a

connection like that, but can you truly establish what's called a causal relationship, meaning

does that event truly cause the outcome?

And the problem with that study is that that was the conclusion that Wakefield wanted to

draw, that people who were getting MMR vaccine were developing autism.

And in fact, that was incorrect, and as you said earlier, that study was eventually revoked,

it was reviewed, found to be that some of that data for that study was not only a very

small number of individuals, which is very hard to study.

You need larger samples, basically, to study something well, but also the data was falsified

and future studies could never reproduce that same result.

In fact, future studies have shown that there is no link between the MMR vaccine and the

development of autism and so as you mentioned, Dr. Wakefield lost his license, the study

was pulled back and discredited.

I'm here to say there is no link, there is no link between receiving an MMR and the development

of autism in the scientific body of knowledge.

- So to follow up on that, he was discredited, the study was discredited, yet there are still

naysayers who are not vaccinating, so why would that be all these years later?

- Well, it did take some time for that study to be discredited.

There was quite a period of years between the study's results and the following retraction

of the study.

That resulted in a lot of discussions with people talking about how these were definitely

connected and of course if you're a parent and you're seeing this happen, you know, it's

scary.

You wanna know why your child developed these symptoms and you wanna make sure you educate

people around you as to well, this is what happens, so I don't want it to happen to you.

A lot of that kind of continued on until the study was officially retracted and then sometimes

it's hard to change those modes of thinking all these years later.

- I think there's some other aspects that I would add onto what Stacey talks about here

is the sense that one, autism is scary and we're seeing it go up in numbers and we wanna

understand why.

I think it's sad that we continue to pay so much time in trying to revoke this kind of

going over and over again on that where we should be putting it towards trying to understand

autism and see if there's ways we could do better on prevention and better treatments

of that.

The other thing that I think, social media probably has an effect, too.

I mean we all go to the sources that we feel best and so sometimes we will go to a source

that I use the word "data" and I use that loosely that we have the data that supports

our pre-held belief instead of being able to continually to look at the bigger picture

and look at the other side's viewpoints to come to those answers.

- So we've got about 30 seconds left and in that time period, can you briefly describe

the types of people that shouldn't get vaccinations?

Who are they?

- It's very minimal, but there are sometimes that you'll find a medical reason not to get

vaccinations.

Just to give you an idea, in Montana, about point four percent of children have a medical

reason and that might be because of an allergy that they have to a component within the vaccine

or it might be that they have a decreased immune system or reasons that they can't get

a specific vaccine.

Sometimes it's so that they can't one or two different vaccines, but they can get the others,

so talk to your provider and go through that.

- We need to pause here and take a quick break, but coming up next we'll talk more about the

impact the anti-vaccination movement is having on public health and what's being done to

overcome it.

Don't go away.

For more infomation >> Part 2 - Healthy Living for Life - Why Vanishing Diseases Are Making a Comeback - Duration: 7:08.

-------------------------------------------

Part 3 - Healthy Living for Life - Why Vanishing Diseases Are Making a Comeback - Duration: 7:40.

The wrong problem is that too many people start doing that, these diseases are appearing

right away and then we do have these problems.

The last one is the group that's just completely unconfident.

They might be not trust government, they might not trust doctors, they might not trust the

pharmaceutical companies or whatever.

Those people are really gonna be hard to switch over and I will still talk with them and give

them my information and listen to them with respect when they come in, but I realize the

chances that they're gonna change over is probably very little unless sadly one of their

children gets the disease, which we highly hope doesn't ever happen or the other area

is their friends and families around them really convince them and that does make a

difference, people that they have built trust with and hearing it from them so it's good

for people that even believe in vaccines to talk about the importance to those around

them.

- So clearly the need for multiple messaging.

- Multiple messaging and a lot of listening, respecting what other people have to say,

too.

- Absolutely.

So I'm gonna turn to Stacey.

You both work for the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, we know

that, and I understand that there is a rather famous individual from Montana who's responsible

for a lot of what we see positive about vaccines, so Stacey, tell us about Dr. Maurice Hilleman.

- Right, so Dr. Maurice Hilleman actually is a native of Mile City, Montana, which not

too many folks know about you know when we learn about the history of vaccines, he's

not one of the names that usually pops up, but he has contributed to the development

as well as the safety and efficacy studies of more than 40 vaccines in his career and

has been credited with saving millions of children's lives.

His body of work has been very powerful and very positive for vaccinations.

An interesting story about him is that he was one of the folks that worked on the MMR

vaccine for measles, mumps and rubella.

His daughter came down with the mumps and he was a scientist working in a lab and so

he took a swab of his daughter's cheek and then grew up the mumps virus that she was

infected with and used that virus to improve the preparation of the MMR vaccine and that

strain is called the Jeryl Lynn strain and it's still in the vaccine that we use today

to protect our children.

And to even make it more of an interesting story, years later, his younger daughter was

one of the first kiddos that was inoculated using this new preparation of the vaccine

and there's an iconic photo out there of the two siblings helping each other through that

process of getting vaccinated.

So we credit him with the positive things that have happened to protect kids against

these diseases that were terrible many, many years ago.

- Another example of a Montanan making a big difference

- absolutely.

- in healthcare, right?

- Yes.

- Let's switch to Dr. Holzman.

So really interesting history, but let's talk about the future.

What does the future hold for vaccinations for all of us?

- Yeah, I'd love to see some more studies and some more vaccines come about because

I think they're huge successes.

But we're seeing things with new diseases.

They confirmed we now have an Ebola vaccine that's going through trials at this point

in time, but they're actually using it right now in the Congo with an outbreak that's going

on there.

Hopefully someday we'll get an HIV vaccine, so there's these infections.

We now have therapeutic vaccines.

This is a little bit different.

So the first vaccine that came out like that was the hepatitis B vaccine.

This is a vaccine going at a virus, but we know that virus has a big effect on having

things like liver cancer so trying to prevent that or HPV trying to prevent cervical cancer,

penile cancer and other issues there, so we have that aspect coming about.

The other thing that we've seen a lot with is some work and I think Stacey and I would

both love to see this is a universal flu vaccine so we don't have to try to guess what's coming

next year and put the strains in there, but finding an antigen aspect on that that we

could give once or once with a booster and then you'd be covered for flu for the rest

of your life.

And then the last thing I think is some of the new areas of how do we give those vaccines.

We have oral vaccines, we have nasal vaccines, but the newest one that's coming about is

what we call microneedles and it's like a little stamp with the antigens on it and they

just push it on there and then they pull back and the antigens stay there and all the sudden,

you start to get a response to that, so wouldn't that be great not to see your child be screaming

when getting those shots and being able to feel that way, so that'd be awesome.

- I will look forward to that day for sure.

Thank you both so much for being with us today.

And thank you for watching.

Be sure to join us again next week.

Until then, stay fit, stay well and stay healthy for life with Healthy Living for Life.

Take care.

- [Announcer] Healthy Living for Life is brought to you by Mountain-Pacific Quality Health.

We'd love to hear from you.

If you have suggestions for future programs, visit our website at mpqhf.org or call us

at 406-443-4020.

You can also catch us on YouTube by visiting our website and clicking on the YouTube icon.

Special thanks to Fire Tower Coffee House and Roasters.

Production facilities provided by Video Express Productions.

For more infomation >> Part 3 - Healthy Living for Life - Why Vanishing Diseases Are Making a Comeback - Duration: 7:40.

-------------------------------------------

5 Signs of an Online Scam: Red Flags to Look for When Looking for Work from Home - Duration: 13:27.

- Hey, Angie Nelson here from theworkathomewife.com.

Today we're going to be talking

about a really important subject,

and that is how to avoid work at home scams.

Now, a lot of people come to me,

and they're usually in either one of two camps.

They either think that everything is a scam

when it comes to work at home jobs,

or they're willing to give almost anything a shot

in order to make the big bucks,

without giving it much thought,

or kind of avoiding those red flags at all costs.

So today we're going to be talking

about what some of those red flags are,

and why they should indicate that a potential job

is actually a scam, as opposed to something legitimate.

And please make sure you stay to the end of the video

to find out how you can learn more

about some great jobs that we know to be legitimate

that you can apply to with confidence.

Now the first red flag that we're talking about today

is the one that usually gets people into a lot of trouble.

And that is what I like to call the stink test.

When you are looking for a work at home job,

you're going to run into a lot of things

that really sound too good to be true,

and that should be your first indication of a scam.

If there is a job that you come across

that is really easy easy work,

that requires minimal brain power,

it's just kind of going through the motion,

and it sounds like it's going to be super simple,

but the job's going to pay you a whole lot of money,

it's probably a scam.

There's just no reason to offer a lot

of these entry level positions

with a really big hourly rate.

There's a lot of competition in the online world,

and a lot of these companies today

are able to outsource some of these

really entry level tasks overseas.

So there's really not any reason for them

to offer something like data entry

with a $75 per hour hourly rate.

Now another thing that you want to keep an eye open for,

something we're running into right now,

is the supposed employers asking you

to open an account somewhere in order to receive payment.

I've heard of them asking you to open an account,

and maybe buy a gift card at iTunes,

or maybe do a wire transfer, something like this.

It's really fishy, this isn't something that you

would run into with a regular, traditional employer,

so it should raise a red flag to you

if you're running into it with a potential online job.

Why would you need to open an iTunes account

to get paid?

There's really no reason for it,

and it should be a signal of a scam to you.

Now the reason that this gets people into trouble

in most cases is because we seem to see

an influx recently of these potential employers

wanting to do interviews on things like Facebook Messenger

or in some other kind of a chat situation,

and what happens in these instances

is these turn into a really high pressure situation,

and they're trying to make you do these things

before you have the opportunity to give it a second chance,

or give it some extra thought,

or maybe do some more research

into who you're applying with.

That should be a big red flag to you.

If you are in one of these positions

where somebody is putting a lot of pressure on you

to give some personal information,

or to open an account somewhere,

or to do something else and it has to be right now,

that should be a red flag,

and it should also raise a red flag to you

if you're getting one of these people contacting you

that's wanting to do an interview

by Facebook Messenger or a chat box somewhere,

where you're not really knowing who you're speaking with.

Why would they be conducting an interview like this?

If a company is going to want to conduct an interview with you,

it's going to either be on the phone

or in many cases these days we're seeing it

being a video interview where they want

to chat with you face to face.

I don't trust chat boxes, and neither should you.

The reason that you shouldn't trust those chat boxes

is because you don't have any idea who you're speaking with.

Anybody can set up a chat box or a Facebook page,

or a Facebook profile and say that they're working

for a company when you have no way to know for sure.

And that is something that should

really be a red flag for you.

If these people are trying to hide their identity,

if they're sending you to a website to apply,

but there's no contact information on that website,

there's no physical address, there's no phone number,

those are all things that should

make your gut instincts give you a little bit

of a red flag there, that you need to proceed with caution.

You should always have a way to contact a company.

You should always be able to do some extra research on them.

In many cases, that's going to be coming

from that contact information that you're able

to find on their website so you know

that they do have a physical location somewhere.

Now a big scam that I'm seeing a lot

in my community right now is a mystery shopping scheme.

What's happening is that these people

are receiving money orders or cashier's check

in the mail from companies that they haven't heard of,

or done any work for, and it's coming

with a list of instructions that they need to follow,

and the first thing they need to do

is go cash this money order or cashier's check.

Well if you haven't done any work for a company,

they're not going to send you a blank check.

That's just plain and simple the way that it is.

Because how are they going to guarantee

that you're actually going to do the work?

No legitimate company is going to send you

just a huge thousand dollar check

in hopes that you're going to perform some kind of task.

It's not going to happen.

If you're receiving a check or money order in the mail,

that should be a huge red flag for you.

In most cases what these companies want you to do

is go cash that cashier's check or money order,

and then you're supposed to buy something,

and in most cases you're supposed to send back

the remainder of the money to them.

Well what happens is that by the time

that your bank finds out that this money order

or cashier's check is fraudulent,

you've already sent money back to these people,

and those people are gone,

and now you're on the line for this check

that you've cashed,

and you're also going to be out any money

that you sent to them,

because you're going to be responsible.

You're the one who cashed the check.

Your bank's either going to take it out of your account,

and even if you don't have an account,

you're probably going to need to

give this check cashing place your I.D.,

in order to cash the check,

and they're going to sue you for that money,

and it's then going to be your responsibility

to turn around and sue whoever it is

that sent you this check.

But the problem is that person's gone.

They probably sent this to you under a fake name,

or a fake company address, and you're never

going to be able to track that person down.

But you're going to be on the line

for whatever amount it is that you have cashed

in the first place.

So don't fall into this, if you don't know

who the company is and you're all of a sudden

receiving checks in the mail out of nowhere,

don't cash them.

You can do some investigation online

to find out who it is, or take it right back

to your post office and let them know that you've

received this money and you don't know

where it came from.

They'll be able to help you out

as far as getting it tracked down and reporting it

if it is actually a fraud.

Now some things that you can do to protect yourself

from these work at home scams is do your research.

There's a lot of research and reviews

that are available online, all you have to do

is open up your Google search and start

checking out the companies that you're applying to.

You can check the Better Business Bureau.

Another place that I love to check is Glassdoor.

Glassdoor allows the independent contractors

and employees of a company to leave their own reviews

about their experiences working with the company.

Now we are talking about reviews,

I do want you to take them with a grain of salt.

One thing you always need to keep in mind

with online reviews is that happy people

don't usually go out of their way to leave them.

Usually the people that are complaining

are going to be people that are just doing that,

they're complaining, they have a complaint

against the company so they're making sure

that someone else is listening to them,

and a lot of times what we see with these reviews

are really personal things, individual experiences,

and we're all unique so our experiences

are going to be different.

Maybe they had a problem with their supervisor.

Maybe they didn't get along,

they had different personalities,

so they didn't mesh well in a working situation.

Maybe the hours weren't good for them,

or the scheduling didn't work out.

Those are all things that maybe

they weren't good for that person,

but maybe they'll work out perfectly for you.

So when you're looking at for reviews online,

I want you to make sure that

you're not looking for excuses.

I know we get in that position often times

in our head where we're scared of moving forward

so we kind of look for any excuse we can

to not have to take that next step

that's outside of our comfort zone.

Do your research, read the reviews,

but always keep in the back of your mind

that that's one person's experience.

Your experience could be totally different.

Now if you are running across those red flags

of people not getting paid for work that's been performed,

or maybe there's some other big serious issue,

definitely keep those in mind when you're moving forward.

But if it's just someone's personality conflict

or a scheduling conflict or things like that

that are unique to one person,

please just take them with a grain of salt.

Another thing that you can do is make sure

that you're keeping your job search to legitimate sites.

I've spoken about Flexjobs in several videos,

that's a very legitimate job board

in order to source leads.

They do all the research for you,

they make sure all the positions

and the companies are legitimate,

and they do have some kind of a flex capacity,

so that is a good place to keep an eye on for leads.

It is a paid job board but they do make sure

everything is on the up and up,

so you can just get in their and apply

to jobs with total confidence.

Now those are just a few of the scams

that we see quite frequently online,

and a few red flags that you should watch out for.

There are hundreds if not thousands

of totally legitimate companies out there

that are looking for work at home agents,

so don't think that everything that you see online

is going to be a scam.

It's not, it's just a matter of doing your research,

and also listening to your gut,

that's something that we should all be doing,

if something sounds too good to be true,

it probably is.

If someone is trying to force you,

back you into a corner and you have to make

a decision right now, that's going to be a red flag as well.

And also if something just seems fishy,

if they want you to sign up

for some weird account somewhere,

or if they are wanting you to perform an interview

over something like a Facebook Messenger

or some other social platform messenger,

those are things that should be red flags.

You should always be able to take your time

and do your research and that's something that companies

should be really open and transparent about.

They should let you know who they are,

who you'll be working for,

what kind of work you'll be performing,

and what you can expect to be paid.

Those are all things that you should be able

to get some information on

before you go ahead and give out any personal information.

Now if you have any further questions about scams

or maybe you want to share your experience

with one that you've ran into,

feel free to leave me a comment before.

I'll also leave you some additional links

to some more information and where you can

do some additional research in the description below.

Now if you liked today's video,

please give it a like and share it

and make sure you're subscribed to my channel

so you'll get notification of the next video.

Until then, I wish you best of luck

in your work at home job search.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét