PUTIN'S FEAR: Trump is using North Korea as guise to line up troops near RUSSIA
RUSSIA fears the United States is trying to provoke North Korea so Washington has an excuse
to flood the region with troops.
Vladimir Putin's foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said Moscow was concerned at Japan
allowing the US to use its territory as a base for a military build-up in north Asia.
The Kremlin chief said: "We are expressing deep concern, with facts to back it up, that
Japan along with South Korea is becoming a territory for the deployment of elements of
the US global missile defence system which is being rolled out in that region under the
pretext of the North Korea threat.
"We have no problems directly with Japan, we do not see risks there.
We see risks because of the proliferation of a global US missile defence system on the
territory of countries that neighbour Russia, including Japan."
Mr Lavrov was speaking at a joint press conference with his Japanese counterpart, Taro Kono,
after talks between the two men in Moscow.
He said: "We are alarmed that in the last two months when North Korea conducted no tests
or rocket launches, it seemed that Washington was not happy about that, and tried to do
things that would irritate and provoke Pyongyang."
He said the US had continued to conduct military exercises in the region during that two month
period and had adopted additional sanctions against Pyongyang.
Referring to US officials, he said: "It's as if they are hoping the North Koreans will
lash out again, and then it would be possible to engage in military options.
"As you know, the US leadership has said many times that all options are on the table, including
military options, and we note that Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, at a meeting with
President Trump in early November, said that he supports the American position 100 per
cent."
Faced with North Korean missile tests and threats from Pyongyang, Tokyo is considering
buying the US-designed Aegis Ashore missile defence system, according to government sources
in Japan.
Mr Lavrov said Moscow was particularly concerned the Aegis Ashore system could be adapted to
fire Tomahawk missiles and warned that would be in violation of a US-Russian arms control
treaty.
Washington and its regional allies deny they are seeking a military build-up, saying that
they are taking the minimum steps necessary to protect themselves from possible aggressive
acts by North Korea.
For more infomation >> PUTIN'S FEAR: Trump is using North Korea as guise to line up troops near RUSSIA - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 3:12.-------------------------------------------
IS깃발 들고 출입구 막은 채 학살..이집트테러 사망 300명 넘어(종합) - Duration: 4:37.
For more infomation >> IS깃발 들고 출입구 막은 채 학살..이집트테러 사망 300명 넘어(종합) - Duration: 4:37. -------------------------------------------
POLITICSTRUMP IS ON FIRE! Taunts NFL Commissioner With Epic Statement About .... | Global News Today - Duration: 5:31.
welcome to global news today please subscribe and check notifications wants
to get off there a news alert politics Trump is on fire taunts NFL Commissioner
with epic statement about his national felon League and this is why we all love
President Donald J Trump because the NFL and it's Ingrid ball tossing illiterate
players have effectively managed to put an end the most popular spectator sport
in America Thanksgiving they did not feature the best football anymore
but that doesn't mean the weren't any NFL fireworks courtesy of President
Donald Trump President Trump retweeted an article shared by dance Covino jr.
about the NFL's poor ratings pinning them on the Giants Olivier Verne and
taking a knee as a service man sang the anthem this Thanksgiving day but as
usual Trump didn't just stop there he also incorporated the now infamous
statement from the Texans owner Bob McNair's about the inmates running the
asylum but he rephrased it a bit and wrote players are the boss at the NFL
the ignoramus that is the ball tossing Vernon has of course been kneeling since
week three so this protest isn't necessarily news but the lack of support
for Thanksgiving games does prove the American public as a whole are sick and
tired of the politicization being done by people who get paid on average two
point 1 million dollars a year to toss around a ball that's more money than
most of us will see in our entire lifetimes
although the NFL and left-wing media outlets like ESPN are set on trying to
convince us that since there are so many games per week people are suffering from
NFL fatigue yeah right via Fox News pay NFL owners tired of half-empty stadiums
this isn't hard tell your players to stand up for America NJ bar boycotts NFL
holds fundraiser for veterans instead co-owners of woodies roadside tavern
speak out on the success of their Sunday event on Fox & Friends
I'm from Green Bay my high school colors were green and gold and I am part owner
of the Green Bay Packers from when they sold stock after the 1997 Super Bowl
victory so it took quite a bit to get me to
boycott the NFL but they managed it until the owners require their players
to stand for the national anthem or sit for the game I won't watch a minute and
I'm not alone since Colin Kaepernick began kneeling during the anthem in a
misguided protest against police violence the NFL has been hemorrhaging
fans both TV viewership and attendance at stadiums are well down and once
people find other ways to spend their Sunday's they may not come back let
there be no doubt the NFL is a business and the owners of those billion
dollar-plus franchises have a problem a bunch of their players want to play
social justice games but their core audience
the folks who pay the bills just want them to play football and we really
don't like the disrespect shown to the anthem the flag and those who fought for
our country including those who came home in coffins with that flag draped
over them this Veterans Day weekend there was quite a duality the NFL went
whole hog saluting the military and trying to mend fences historically the
league and most of the players have been very supportive of the military part of
that was the tens of millions of tax dollars the military paid them to put on
displays with the flag and flyovers for the recruiting value but there was also
a genuine bond for the most part but at the same time there was a push to
boycott the NFL I did my part on social media like many others seeing a bunch of
pampered millionaires stealing the moment when we should all come together
in thanks for the freedoms we enjoy and yes for those who safeguard them well
that just flat pisses me off they say the protests are not against
the anthem or the flag or the military for that matter but that is garbage
because the effect is to disrespect all of those things so they convert to
signal their solidarity with the radical left they could do their social justice
pandering whenever they want and they made a conscious choice by choosing to
put the spotlight on themselves instead of the symbols of what makes this
country great that just doesn't sit well with those of us who served or have
family who did or who just want to enjoy a foot
all game without politics we get plenty of bitter arguments and displays of
partisanship all day every day football was a time to forget all that and just
remember how much the Bears still suck they took that and even worse did so
with divisive anti-police grievance mongering to a crowd with a heavy
component of blue lives matters sentiment we will see if the NFL charm
offensive worked although the pictures of half-empty
stadiums should sure give the owners cause to worry it's pretty simple to fix
tell the players to stand up for America or the rest of us mace it out dot
permanently the bottom line here is that no matter what narrative the left-wing
media tries to spin this on people as a whole side with President Trump on this
issue if this was indeed NFL fatigue then NFL stadiums wouldn't be half or
more empty while college football stadiums are practically full and have
not suffered any decline in viewership or attendance whatsoever Americans still
love football it's the NFL they refused to
-------------------------------------------
Paul Ryan Is Scared Stiff! He Just Got The Greatest Liberal Surprise Of His Life - Duration: 4:11.
With the governor's races in both New Jersey and Virginia lost to Democrats, numerous in
the media are giving what they demand is a look into the 2018 midterms.
On the Virginia front, there is definitely no motivation behind why the Democrats ought
to have trusted that this seat was ever in danger, however, maybe the election day nerves
of a year ago creeped in, similar to when the surveys demanded that Hillary had a 96%
possibility of being crowned.
As the Dems were doing their triumph lap, they never considered the way that Ed Gillespie
was a Bush man and just embraced President Trump's policies later in the game.
Actually, he shied far from having the president talk in the state for his benefit.
That, all by itself, could have been a major sign to Trump supporters that Gillespie was
simply playing the field and didn't generally grasp anything in the Trump plan.
We have, all things considered, been tricked much over and over again to be that confiding
at once more.
Regardless of the losses in the predominantly Leftist territory, the Republicans are dreadful
that their authoritative pace isn't satisfactory to Trump supporters.
With the Congress in virtual neutral gear since the inauguration, voters are to a great
degree annoyed with the Swamp RINOs who appear to be set up to do literally nothing to advance
the Trump agenda.
Paul Ryan is one of the individuals who are frightful.
What's more, now, with their energized base, Democrat leaders are cautioning the Speaker
that he is in the line of sight!
Via Daily Caller:
House Speaker Paul Ryan's congressional seat is a "new battleground," according
to a memo released Thursday by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
DEMOCRATS ARE CONFIDENT AFTER A WAVE OF VICTORIES IN ELECTIONS TUESDAY.
"FOLLOWING OUR EARLY SUCCESS, THE DCCC IS TODAY ADDING 11 ADDITIONAL REPUBLICAN-HELD
DISTRICTS TO OUR OFFENSIVE BATTLEFIELD, WHICH NOW TOTALS 91 DISTRICTS," DCCC CHAIRMAN
BEN RAY LUJAN WROTE IN THE MEMO.
The memo highlighted Trump's low approval rating in several congressional districts.
According to the DCCC, Trump's favorability in Ryan's Wisconsin district is 52 percent
negative and 42 percent positive.
"Being an establishment Republican isn't any better in the eyes of voters," the memo
reads.
"In fact, Speaker Paul Ryan is even more viscerally disliked than Trump in many districts."
Ryan's favorability in his own district is 47 percent positive and 46 percent negative.
However, in Virginia's Tenth Congressional District, Ryan is only viewed favorably by
20 percent of voters.
Likewise, in Pennsylvania's Sixth Congressional District, just 21 percent of voters view the
House Speaker positively.
Ryan is being challenged in the Republican primary by Paul Nehlen.
Nehlen is an ally of former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon.
"I've got three certainties in life: Death, taxes, and attacks from Breitbart," Ryan
has previously stated about Bannon's website.
Democrat Ryan Bryce is also seeking to unseat Ryan.
Bryce, nicknamed "Iron Stache," is a union iron worker who has accused Ryan of turning
his "back on our community."
"Across Southeastern Wisconsin, in places like Kenosha and Janesville; Racine and Elkhorn,
factories are closing down and our jobs are being shipped away," Bryce wrote on his
website.
Just as of late, DC Clothesline posted a posting of 24 of the most pro-Trump, anti-Establishment
Republicans liable to go up against the officeholders in their states.
Paul Nehlen is an alluring hopeful and a no-nonsense Conservative.
Tragically, regardless of the possibility that he wins, the Speakership won't stay
with Wisconsin.
Nonetheless, that being stated, Ryan would best start to implement the Trump agenda with
a reestablished power inconspicuous in Congress since the Gingrich Revolution and the Contract
With America in the mid-1990s.
That kind of participation with the Oval Office would positively play well with Trump voters
and potentially promise him reelection.
-------------------------------------------
How is this frustating - Duration: 7:53:19.
For more infomation >> How is this frustating - Duration: 7:53:19. -------------------------------------------
Fired! One Democrat Is Facing An Ethics Sanction, Libs Can't Believe Their Eyes - Duration: 4:05.
You would surmise that that subsidiary with the media would understand that with the present
condition of the web, that keeping a top on stories is practically inconceivable.
One basic tweet and the ugly truth is out in the open as sites illuminate with the news,
regardless of the possibility that it is very theoretical.
That the story may not be right or have been misshaped is insignificant.
It will get free, and once that occurs there is no returning it in the jug.
Stories with sexual hints, particularly those including big names, are extremely unpredictable.
Individuals appear to desire this sort of news, so the web, as of now an effective power
for spreading news and chatter, goes into hyper-roll over such disclosures.
Best to fess up and attempt to get really out there than to leave the web to its own
with the unavoidable contortions and hypotheses that will be spread.
Democratic attorney David Boies evidently doesn't comprehend this as he attempted
to put a cover on the Harvey Weinstein story while his law office was working for The New
York Times.
Clearly, he fizzled.
How might anybody expect something else?
Anyway, the NYT has ended its association with Mr. Boies' law office, something that
shouldn't come as a lot of a shock either.
Mainstream media outlets, for example, The New York Times positively require no assistance
in depicting the picture that they are basically mouthpieces for the left.
This is an acknowledged actuality among conservatives and has helped start the "fake news" allegations
that have been heaved at media firms, for example, CNN.
That these assaults have stuck is a measure of the disappointment conservatives have had
with a news industry that is overpowering one-sided against their political perspectives.
"The New York Times dismissed the firm of famed Democratic lawyer David Boies after
Ronan Farrow's explosive report for the New Yorker put Boies at the center of Harvey
Weinstein's efforts to stamp out the Times' reporting on his sexual misconduct.
"'WE NEVER CONTEMPLATED THAT THE LAW FIRM WOULD CONTRACT WITH AN INTELLIGENCE FIRM TO
CONDUCT A SECRET SPYING OPERATION AIMED AT OUR REPORTING AND OUR REPORTERS,' THE TIMES
WROTE IN A TUESDAY STATEMENT ANNOUNCING THEY WOULD NO LONGER WORK WITH BOIES'S FIRM,
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER.
'SUCH AN OPERATION IS REPREHENSIBLE.'"
Mr. Boies and his law office have just exacerbated the situation, something the NYT has conceded.
So we have a law office controlled by Democrats, attempting to advance Democratic causes.
Up until this point, nothing amiss with that.
At that point, one of the principals of the law office stepped over the line by attempting
to control the arrival of news by one of its customers, The New York Times.
"Monday, immediately after Farrow's piece broke, the New York Times issued a statement
aghast at Boies, Schiller & Flexner's conduct, reading:
"'We learned today that the law firm of Boies Schiller and Flexner secretly worked
to stop our reporting on Harvey Weinstein at the same time as the firm's lawyers were
representing us in other matters … We consider this intolerable conduct, a grave betrayal
of trust, and a breach of the basic professional standards that all lawyers are required to
observe.
It is inexcusable and we will be pursuing appropriate remedies.'"
As the Times must know, this kind of disclosure just draws in more claims that the paper is
a purveyor of "fake news," or for this situation, no news in the event that it influences
Democrats to look terrible.
The inquiry remains what, assuming any, move the Times will make against Boies and his
law office.
There's a reasonable moral violation here.
What's more, what Boies did has done nothing to help the notoriety of the daily paper.
On the off chance that anything, it just affirmed what many as of now accept is a reality.
The greater inquiry is whether the Times will ever have the capacity to build up itself
as a reliable source.
Not to be cynical, but rather without a noteworthy possession change and an enormous shakeup
inside the paper, it's suspicious.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét