Thứ Sáu, 24 tháng 11, 2017

Waching daily Nov 24 2017

Don't complain about others

change yourself

because, it is easy to protect your feet with slippers

rather than carpeting the whole world, the whole Earth.

Remember, I spoke to you about the irritating noises? I got the answers now.

One more line.

A beautiful understanding about life.

Your problem is never really your problem

Your problem is never really your problem? Okay.

Your reaction to the problem is actually

your problem.

Do not get upset with people

or situations.

They are powerless without your reaction.

Beautiful right?

No.

Not beautiful? Why?

I am not a dead body.

Like I told about people who spoilt my car,

Should I not react at all?

See, it is such a beautiful line - "Your problem is not the problem".

Your problem

is not the problem

your reaction to the problem is the actual problem.

Let us look at this sentence

and let us play with it the whole day.

Your problem is not the problem

Your reaction to the problem

You make things so easy

let's play around, let's make it a game.

It looks like...

If we use it whole day, then it would be so much fun.

Because

We say we face so many problems.

Yes there are problems, even as simple as someone slamming your car door or stock market crashing

someone is not well or someone betrayed you.

These are problems

but how much pain do these problems create in me

that pain is the actual problem right?

If something doesn't create pain in me

then how big will that problem be?

Then we say it was just a small issue, it came and we crossed it.

Because there was no pain created it.

So where is the actual problem? The problem is the pain.

Pain in any form

irritation, anger, fear, jealousy, criticism, anxiety

anything which creates

turbulent energy

negative energy.

Here is the pain. The more the pain

the bigger the problem seems, to me.

Because that pain is getting increased

more the pain, more will be the suffering

more will be the suffering

If there is no pain

and there is no suffering, then the problem no longer seems a problem to me.

That's a nice point, so that means

If I face a lose a huge amount of money

My partner is with me

and even he loses the same amount (of money)

If he gets a heart attack and I don't

so does it means - that problem was not a problem for me?

That problem was not a problem for you isn't it?

-That is a nice point. -Because

if I do not get disturbed,

see it is a very simple thing.

If there is an earthquake

If there is an earthquake, your house is here

and so is mine.

After the earthquake,

if your house collapses but my house is fine.

Then how would that earthquake be a problem for me?

This house "within"

In life there will be earthquakes

Earthquake in the sense problems or situations or anything.

But even after the earthquake if you remain unshaken

Then how was it a problem for you?

There is a saying - "A challenge turned into a gift."

Oh wow.

Because even after the problem, you are not letting it affect you right?

You are not shaken even after the earthquake.

A house remained steady even after an earthquake because its foundation was very strong.

But the person who's house is shaken, i.e. his life

His state of mind is shaken.

For the person whose mind was strong, earthquake came and nothing happened

It won't seem a problem to him.

A person who felt the pain

for him it was a problem.

And the person who did feel the pain

he won't call it a problem.

He says the situation came and left.

Someone else will say a problem came and left.

Another person will call it crisis

-Yet another other person will call it a chaos - Calamity

Calamity. This depends on how much pain got created.

If there is wind blowing

and you are standing still

but is someone is shaken due to it

then that wind is equivalent to a strong storm for him as it shook him.

So the size of the problem

will totally depend on how much I shook

due to the problem.

Often we see a particular situation affects somebody so deeply and we cannot understand why.

There can be various reasons for that

So we say , "I cannot understand how they can get so affected by such a small thing."

But that situation is a very big problem for them

Why? Because its effect is very deep on them.

So this line is so beautiful

"Your problem is not the problem"

"your reaction to the problem is the actual problem".

So the real problem is not the problem?

When the situation came

When I started to learn driving, I once took my mother for a drive.

Traffic cops used to stop vehicles signaling with their hands those days and one of them stopped me.

And I said, "This policeman stops traffic the moment I reach here."

"He is so irritating."

"He stops just when my vehicle has to cross the signal."

And then my mother told me, "Don't try to cool milk which is already cold."

It means if you are trying to cool hot milk it makes sense, but why blowing air into already cold milk?

Why?

Because even she is with you sitting in the same car

but she saw how even in such a small situation, you got so disturbed.

I shouted about the policemen as well.

She is detached

Yes, she told me that he is doing his duty.

She was not affected at all by the car being stopped.

She accepted that the policemen is doing his duty.

But she saw that if the same thing is affecting you so much

The situation was same but the reactions were different.

For you, that reaction

was the problem.

and that's why she felt you were reacting when it was not needed.

-Why? -I was angry for no reason.

We can experiment this all the time.

There are a lot of things which affect us but not the other people around us,

and there are also some situations which don't affect us

but others are affected.

It depends on our Sanskar (Habit).

Suppose I have a sanskar of anger, I get angry. But you do not have that sanskar, so you do not get angry.

If I have the sanskar of getting hurt

then I will get hurt in every other situation

but you won't.

If you have the sanskar of criticizing and I do not have

Under certain situations you will create turbulent energy by being critical and I will be fine.

It will all depend

that over a period of time

what quality of thinking have we adopted

to create certain programming.

So when a situation comes, we react through that programming.

And hence even the output comes accordingly.

So the issue is not in the problem

it is in our programming, our reaction and the final output.

And that is why the second line was so beautiful

Do not get upset or irritated with people

they are powerless without your reaction.

Look at the line. They are powerless, without your reaction.

Suppose you are sitting here

and you are constantly saying unpleasant things to me

you may be criticizing or angry, but if it is not disturbing me.

You made me powerless right, in the first three episodes.

I used to speak so much.

But, if we get disturbed

and say, "They disturb me"

It means we made them very powerful.

We gave the remote control of our state of our mind to them.

If I give you the power to control my mind

what more power can we give somebody ?

"My mind is now your slave."

Your one word can either pull me down or it can push me up.

So I made the other person so powerful.

I gave people the remote control of my mind.

How powerful I have made them ?

But if we keep our remote control with ourselves

then it does not matter what the other person says, is it not?

No matter what he does, he does not have the power.

Actually I personally feel like, for example

if a small kid comes to me and says

"Uncle, if I punch you, you will fall down."

So cute. Yes.

And then I find it so cute that I start reciprocating.

I know that he does not have the power to do it

So what you are saying is right.

What did you do at that moment?

-You enjoyed what he said, right? -Yes.

You embraced that, you embraced that kid right?

I found him cute, hugged him and played with him.

But why did I do it? I did because I knew I have the power to do it

Now as per what you are saying, we do not have that power.

So where do we get the power from?

We do have it

But we are not using it.

If we do have it and we are not using it

Then suppose if I have a lot of money in a locker and I do not have its keys

then how do I get it?

You said we do not have the power. Let us experiment that as well.

There are a lot of people after listening to whom, we are allowed to get angry.

And there are a lot of people after listening to whom, we are not allowed get angry.

Right?

If I have a senior shouting at me, I cannot shout back at him.

If I have a junior

and if he is wrong, I can shout at him.

Right?

So when I am with my juniors, staff, or colleagues

then I can be angry. It is allowed. Says who?

Says me. My programming says that

I am allowed to shout at them

so I shout at them, I get angry.

My programming says I cannot get angry at somebody else.

So when my programming says I cannot get angry at somebody

now it does not matter what that person says

No matter what they do, even if I am getting upset from within.

Can I shout back at them?

Look at the complete Customer Care industry.

Look at the complete Hospitality industry.

Service centers, air hostess, hotels.

All of the staff of Hospitality and Customer Care Service industries

they are trained completely

What is their training?

That no matter how your client talks to you

no matter how he reacts over the phone

How should your reaction be?

Smile

and say, "Yes sir."

"Thank you sir."

This is their conditioning.

This is the preparation of their mind

Now if someone calls you regarding an offer or scheme

or to sell a Credit Card

and you are in a meeting and you end up shouting at him.

You shout saying this and that.

He politely replies, "I am sorry sir, I will call you back later."

He will talk so politely and end the call.

It is his conditioning.

His preparation.

It is his means for bread and butter.

Yes, there is a reason behind it, is it not?

He gets paid for it.

Very good. Why did I do that conditioning?

For my money

Come what may, I have to respond with politeness and love.

Programming.

In Russia we went to a museum

and there a tall artist

He would stand there for hours without even blinking.

We laughed in front of him

we danced and joked around him

but he was just not blinking.

It is his conditioning, his job.

That is physical conditioning

and right now we are talking about emotional conditioning.

That you cannot react to anything.

Even he did not react.

So whoever is conditioned, they follow it strictly.

Today, even if we are in their place we will do it.

If we are doing that job today

where no matter what happens

even if someone talks to you rudely, you need to talk politely. We will do that.

Anyone will do it.

Anybody and everybody can do this.

Why? Because the programming says, "If you do not do this, you lose your job."

"If you do not do this, you lose your job."

So we do it.

Now, I write my coding as -

"If you do not do this, you lose your happiness."

"Do you want to be happy?"

"Do you want happiness in life?"

"No matter how the other person talks to you"

"Smile"

"Smile, be polite"

"and say okay."

For more infomation >> Your Problem is NOT THE PROBLEM: 8a: BK Shivani (English Subtitles) - Duration: 14:53.

-------------------------------------------

What is electricity? - Electricity Explained - Duration: 10:40.

Electricity is vital to our civilization.

So what is electricity and how does it work?

To explain electricity we need to zoom passed the molecular and into the atomic level.

Atoms are the smallest things we can kind of see, but not with the naked eye: Only with

a scanning tunnelling microscope can we get a glimpse of somewhat fuzzy spheres.

To really understand electricity, we must go even further and look inside an atom.

This is where it gets complicated, because the inside of an atom cannot be seen, at least

not at the time of writing.

So, we'll use this representation of the inside of an atom.

This is called the Bohr-model, keep in mind that it is not to scale, and only two-dimensional.

This model is also known as the planetary model, modelling the parts of an atom as planets

orbiting a sun – or moons around a planet.

While actually, these orbiting moons are not at any one place at any one time at all, but

exist more as regions, or clouds, around the core.

However inaccurate the Bohr-model might be, it will do for our explanation of electricity.

Atoms consist of protons and neutrons, these form the nucleus of the atom.

Orbiting the nucleus are the electrons.

It's these electrons that are responsible for electricity, hence the name.

Think of these orbits more as shells, surrounding the nucleus.

What type of atom – which element – it is, is defined by the number of protons in

the nucleus, at the centre.

Atoms of one element all have the same number of protons, but can have different numbers

of neutrons and electrons.

It's this variable number of electrons, that is important to our understanding.

Electrons – which are far lighter than the protons in the nucleus – can relatively

easily move.

And this is important, because the movement of electrons is what forms an electric current.

The atom's protons account for the positive charge of the nucleus, and the electrons for

the negative charge.

In a stable, resting, or rather, neutral electrical condition, these charges balance each other

out within the atom.

This gives the atom a net electric charge of zero, for each positive proton you will

find one negative electron.

In this state the atom is at its lowest possible energy level, which we call the ground state

of the atom.

However, we can change the atom's charge, or energy level, by causing it to gain or

lose electrons.

When the atom has fewer electrons than protons, it becomes positively charged.

But when the atom has more electrons than protons, the net charge swings back the other

way, and it becomes negatively charged.

More electrons than protons mean the atom is negatively charged, fewer electrons than

protons mean it is positively charged.

Losing or gaining electrons changes the atom's electric charge.

The remainder of this video we will colour code the atoms, as follows:

A positive charge – or absence of electrons – is represented with red.

A negative charge – a surplus of electrons – is represented with blue.

A neutral charge – or a balance between electrons and protons – is represented by

a blend of red and blue: Purple.

So, when in a ground state or uncharged, it looks like this – and it's called an atom.

When charged, negatively or positively, it looks like these.

Instead of atoms, when there is a charge, they are called a negative or positive ion.

Each shell of an atom can hold a maximum number of electrons.

The inner shell can hold 2 electrons, the second can hold 8, the third 18, and there

are elements with all seven known shells.

Shells are populated with electrons from the inside out.

Meaning that added electrons always go for the inner-most shell possible with a spot

left.

The number of electrons on the outermost shell determines the reactivity of the atom.

This shell is called the valence shell, and its electrons are called valence electrons.

When the outermost shell is full, the atom is generally stable and least reactive.

You may be familiar with the term and effects of static electricity.

When you, for instance, shuffle your feet over a nice, soft carpet…

…you build up a positive charge, because negatively charged electrons are being lost

to the carpet.

Carpets are often made from a material with the properties of an insulator.

Insulators do not easily give up electrons but can get a local charge when electrons

from a conductor are rubbed off on them.

These electrons will just sit there until something else takes them away.

An insulator's valence shell is already quite full of electrons.

However, your body is a conductor.

Conductors have loosely bound valence electrons which are easily transferred or lost, in this

case from your body to the area of the carpet where you're shuffling.

Instead of you and the carpet having a neutral charge, a charge imbalance is being created

between you and the carpet.

Now, when you touch a metal object, for instance a door knob, you get zapped.

The door knob may be neutrally charged: it is metal.

And, metals too, are conductors, with loosely bound electrons on the outer shells of their

atoms.

These electrons immediately move to your body to restore the charge imbalance, giving you

a jolt.

Nature always seeks a neutral charge equilibrium, a net charge of zero.

Materials with high electron mobility, are called conductors.

Materials with low electron mobility, are called insulators.

A commonplace object where you can see an insulator and conductor working together,

is in a simple wire.

This electrical wire has a copper core and a plastic shell.

Copper atoms have a very loosely bound electron on the outside, as seen here again using the

Bohr-model.

This makes copper a perfect conductor, whereas the plastic is an insulator.

The millions, if not billions, of copper atoms in this piece of wire, easily exchange electrons,

allowing us to make an electrical circuit with it.

Think of an electrical circuit as a path that connects two points with a possible charge

imbalance, usually connecting a negatively charged point to a positively charged.

Like marbles in a tube moving from a high place full of marbles to a low place lacking

marbles.

Imagine these marbles all along the circuit, each marble being an electron.

These marbles originate from a power source, for instance a battery.

And we'll explain how batteries work exactly, in a future video.

Electrons move from the negative to the positive, as we've established earlier.

The battery pushes out electrons from one end and attracts them from the other.

As one is pulled in, one is pushed out.

Despite the electrons moving relatively slowly, this effect causes the energy to be transferred

almost instantaneously.

To create such a flow of electrons, we must provide them a path with a conductor, such

as the copper within our wire.

If this path is blocked by an insulator, such as plastic, rubber, or air in the case of

a cut wire, the electrons cannot continue to flow – stopping the electric current.

The key to the flow of electricity is making a continuous electrical circuit.

Connecting a wire between a source of electrons, and an attractor of electrons.

All electrical devices are powered this way, that is why your battery has two poles: A

source and an attractor, a negative and a positive.

This is also why your electrical plug has at least two tongs, one for incoming electrons,

one for outgoing.

You see, electrons are not spent, they do not cease existing: They are mere carriers

of charge and can only be useful on their way to their destination.

Take note, that connecting two poles of a power source directly, can actually be very

dangerous(!)

This is what's called a short circuit, because there is nothing between the source and the

destination of electrons, to power, such as a lamp or television.

This means that the electron flow will not encounter any resistance.

The release of energy, when short circuiting, is there for instant, often paired with the

involved wire heating dangerously.

This is why buildings and some devices, have fuses, these automatically cut the current

flow, when the current becomes too high, preventing damage or worse: Fire.

In the next videos on electricity, we'll learn more about generating power, resistance,

voltage, amperes, batteries, fuses, motors, transformers and more.

Subscribe and hit that bell to get notified when a new video drops.

If you can, share this video with someone who can appreciate it.

Your support is what keeps me making these videos.

Thanks to you and my patrons on Patreon, this channel is possible.

Click to see another video, or to subscribe.

Sources in the description and - thank you for watching.

For more infomation >> What is electricity? - Electricity Explained - Duration: 10:40.

-------------------------------------------

Bitcoin is a 'safe-haven' and could save the Zimbabwean economy from COLLAPSING - Duration: 4:50.

Bitcoin is a 'safe-haven' and could save the Zimbabwean economy from COLLAPSING

The cyber currency bitcoin is considered to be a volatile and highly speculative investment, but for Zimbabweans, it offers protection from the onset of hyperinflation and financial implosion.

As banks deposits lose value almost by the day, people are turning to bitcoin while others are using the currency to fund family members abroad. Manhizwa, a 34-year-old farmer, and father of two, said bitcoin is a safe-haven asset.

He said: "If I have $500 in the bank I won't get it back and I will be losing value, but when I have my bitcoin it is going up every day.

"If I put that money in a bank right now in Zimbabwe I will be left with nothing." There are warnings bitcoin may be a bubble waiting to burst, but the dire state of Zimbabwe's financial system under President Mugabe is encouraging risk-taking.

The government adopted the US dollar in 2009 after a bout of hyperinflation rendered the Zimbabwean dollar worthless, wiping out savings in the now defunct national currency.

After a period of relative stability, acute shortages of dollar cash have set in, leaving Zimbabweans with electronic units in their bank accounts which are officially called dollars but have a far lower - and rapidly decreasing - value.

In January if they wanted to buy $100 in cash they had to transfer $120 out of their account to a seller on the parallel market. Now the price is $180 in what are nicknamed "zollars".

As a result of Zimbabweans turning to the cyber currency, bitcoin's value has surged to a record high. Nearly all domestic transactions are made via debit card or transfers using mobile phones.

But some economists estimate inflation is more than 50 percent a month in zollar terms, far from the official, dollar-calculated rate of 0.38 percent.

Arnold Manhizwa, who works for an IT and telecoms company in Harare said: "I have now changed all my reserves to bitcoin because that is the only way I can protect my investment." When Zimbabwe achieved independence in 1980, the Zimbabwean dollar was more valuable than the US.

The country also experienced strong growth and development in the early years. But, due to economic reforms from 1991 to 1996 which saw white landowners evicted and replaced by black farmers with no experience.

The country experienced a sharp drop in food production and in all other sectors. The banking system also collapsed with farmers unable to get loans for capital.

Zimbabwe has been plunged into political chaos after the military seized power from elderly despot Robert Mugabe last week.

The coup came soon after Mugabe sacked his Vice President Emmerson Mnangagwa who had been engaged in a succession battle with his wife Grace Mugabe.

Mugabe resigned this week and Mnangagwa is set to return from political exile to take power in Zimbabwe.

For more infomation >> Bitcoin is a 'safe-haven' and could save the Zimbabwean economy from COLLAPSING - Duration: 4:50.

-------------------------------------------

Ancient Archaeological Mysteries! You'll Never believe whose tomb is MISSING! - Duration: 12:33.

from ancient archaeological sites lost burial sites and strange stone fears

there are some archaeological discoveries that are hard to decipher

stay tuned to number one to find out the most mysterious unsolved archaeological

discovery and how it still puzzles archaeologists today

number five death of Alexander the Great and his final resting place Alexander

the third of Macedonia also known as Alexander the Great was a Greek military

leader who led the Greeks in an invasion of Persia and India in the fourth

century BCE after an intense military campaign

Alexander finally died in Babylon at the age of 32 but his death throws into

question two mysteries first how did he die and second where is his body today

there was much speculation around the cause of his death

and since archaeologists don't have a body to autopsy they have to rely on the

primary accounts from the time one theory is that he was poisoned this is

mentioned in a number of primary sources like works by Diodorus and Justin

however not all are convinced by this such as the Greek author Plutarch who

dismissed the idea that Alexander was killed in a poisoning as a likely

conspiracy and fabrication the main argument against the poisoning theory is

the time that passed between Alexander falling ill and his death eleven days

later more recent arguments have suggested that Vera term album a white

hellebore plant could have caused the delay in death nevertheless as with any

mystery there is always more than one theory floating around and others have

attributed his death to natural causes such as malaria or typhoid fever until

someone finds his final resting place and hopefully enough of his body to

conduct a scientific investigation archaeologists will simply have to use

the evidence available to argue for or against different theories but why don't

we know where his body is we should probably call this number

five-and-a-half as it's really a question all of its own initially as one

would expect of a great leader his body was laid to rest immediately after his

death and was visited later by rulers like Julius Caesar and Augustus but in

the centuries after his death the body was moved on two occasions and later

lost from the archaeological and literary record according to the

literary evidence available his body was laid to rest in a

gold sarcophagus and was on its way to Macedon when it was seized by Ptolemy

one of Alexander's successors and temporarily taken to Memphis later told

me the second moved the sarcophagus to Alexandria where it remained until

Ptolemy the fourth replaced the sarcophagus with a glass one and used

the original one to create coins his tomb in Alexander II was open to the

public Intel for unknown reasons it was closed by Emperor septimus severus after

this its fate is unknown some believe this so-called Alexander sarcophagus

housed in the Instanbul Archaeological Museum contained Alexander's remains but

this idea has since fallen out of favor and his body and final resting place

still remain a mystery hopefully one day in the near future archeologists or even

an enthusiastic metal detector might unearth the final resting place of

Alexander the Great and this archaeological mystery will finally come

to an end number four linear a Minoan language

mainly associated with the island of Crete in the Mediterranean linear a is a

form of writing that remains undeciphered inscribed on clay tablets

it is believed to be the origin of the later Linear B script that was

successfully decoded in the 1950s unfortunately although both writing

systems contain some similar symbols archeologists have been unable to

decipher linear a nevertheless just because you don't know what something

says does not mean that you can't investigate it and this is exactly what

archaeologists have done dated 2500 to 1450 BCE the writing style overlapped

with another style known as Cretan hieroglyphic writing and examples have

been found mainly on Crete but also some on the agent islands and on mainland

Greece although some archeologists believe they contain palace or religious

writings until some bright spark manages to decipher the mysterious writing we

will just have to guess what the writing contains number three stone spheres of

Costa Rica locally known as las bolas grandes or the great stone balls in

spanish these mysterious stone spheres are located on the

Delta and the isla del caño in Costa Rica one notable archaeological site

where they've been found is palmar Sur on the southern part of Costa Rica

dating between 300 and 800 seee the area appears to have served as a

multifunctional site with a settlement Cemetery monumental architecture and

sculptures it also contains over 300 Petrus fairs

which create three puzzling questions what was their function how were they

created and where did the material come from as with many of these ancient

megaliths and sculptures the exact function of these spheres remains a

mystery some believe they are grave markers while others believe they might

have been a form of money but it's not just a function that's mysterious how

did their makers manage to create such perfect spheres even in today's age with

significant advances in tools and techniques it is still remarkably

difficult to craft flawless spheres from stone by hand

unfortunately the exact method used to craft them is unknown but some artisans

believe they are some of the finest examples of precision stone carving in

the ancient world even if archeologists managed to

determine why and how they were created it still leaves the question where did

the creators get the granite from while the nearest source found is many miles

away it doesn't show any signs of querying which begs the question where

did the material come from with so many unanswered questions archaeologists will

likely never know the true function behind these stones and it is possible

that they will remain a mystery for years to come which is always a good

thing as it keeps the archaeologists busy number 2 gobekli tepe

Turkey situated about seven hundred and sixty kilometres above sea level in the

southeastern Anatolia region of Turkey gobekli tepe

is an archaeological site dating back between the 10th and 8th millennium BCE

its existence was first noted during a survey conducted in 1963 however

archaeologist Peter Benedict mistook the only parts of the site above ground at

the time to be stone slab grave markers an easy mistake to make if you aren't

familiar with local site and it wasn't until archaeologist Klaus

Schmidt came across the description of the stone slabs and subsequently began

excavating the site in 1994 that the true skill of the discovery was known if

Klaus didn't stumble across that description of the site it's possible

that it could have remained misinterpreted for years to come

Schmidt's excavations found two distinct phases of use the earliest phase dated

back to the 10th millennium BCE making it the oldest known megalithic structure

in the world in an unprecedented display of ability

this part of the site was made up of about 20 circles of more than 200

massive t-shaped pillars slightly less grand the second phase consisted of

smaller pillars that stood in rectangular rooms with polished lime

floors for unknown reasons the site was abandoned after the pre pottery

Neolithic VIII period which ended just over 8,000 years ago like with any good

mystery this site leaves archaeologists scratching their heads with some of

these pillars weighing between 10 and 20 metric tons how did they lift the

massive blocks let alone transfer them from the query to the site well

archaeologists believe that would have taken about 500 people to move the

stones which is a lot of people considering humans didn't live in big

groups at a time and that also brings up more questions than it answers why did

so many people group together to create the site well unfortunately the exact

function of the site remains a mystery but after excavating the site

Schmidt believed it to be a pilgrimage destination that attracted worshipper

from up to 100 miles away a considerable distance to walk especially remembering

that the will wasn't invented until 3500 BCE but who were these people and what

did they believe that made them create such a massive structure one which

clearly would have taken a lot of effort to build

luckily Schmidt had an answer for this as well a cult of the dead although no

tombs or graves were found Schmidt believed they lay undiscovered

and ironically it wasn't until after his death the evidence to support his theory

was found only recently in 2017 a human crania with incisions

was found interpreted as evidence of a Neolithic school cult even if you accept

Schmidt's theory for why was created and what it was used for that still leaves

the question how did they move the blocks and who exactly build the

structure number one Stonehenge England situated in Wiltshire in the southern

region of England Stonehenge has puzzled travelers local inhabitants and

archaeologists for centuries although parts of the site date back to about

3000 BCE the site under winds several major modifications over a span of 2,000

years before finally falling into disuse however unlike other archaeological

sites parts of it have always been above ground and Britain reference to this

site dates back to 1130 AD and this has resulted in numerous theories as to what

it was used for today the sign is most famous first astronomical alignments

with thousands of people flocking to the site to celebrate the summer and winter

solstices even today after centuries of investigations archaeologists still

debate why it was originally created by whom and for what purpose

with several modifications throughout its use it is no simple task to answer

these questions an archaeologists have come to the conclusion that it was a

multifunctional site that was used for different reasons at different times

popular theories for its function ranged from a burial site a UFO landing site an

astronomical calendar all the way to a ritualistic temple or altar also recent

archaeological investigation suggests it was part of a much larger archaeological

site that contains numerous ancient structures which again poses even more

questions than it answers so many mysteries surround this site why was it

originally built why was it continuously developed who built it where did the

material come from and how did they transport them when it comes to how they

built it it is worth mentioning that some of the stones known as blue stones

originated from a query 140 miles away in wells now these stones weighed about

two tons how did they move them some believe they may have been used in other

monuments nearby and dismantled and brought to will char

while others believe they could have been brought to the site directly from

the query regardless of which theory you believe the next question becomes how

did they move them did they move them over land by placing them on wooden

rolling pillars or did they manage to create a boat strong enough to hold

their weight unfortunately even though archaeologists have tried to replicate

the method they haven't been successful so far and remains one of the most

significant mystery surrounding the site overall so much remains unanswered about

Stonehenge and with the continuous discovery of new sites and finds this

sign is likely going to puzzle archaeologists for years to come which

is likely a good thing as everybody enjoys a good mystery

tell us what you think about stone hedge and other sites in the comments below

also don't forget to hit that subscribe button for more interesting information

catch you next time

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét