Thứ Năm, 23 tháng 11, 2017

Waching daily Nov 23 2017

Pokémon needs changes.

Those changes, will only be made possible by taking 3DS & throwing it in the garbage

forever, but, I'll get to that, FIRST I gotta say: Happy Thanksgiving!

We've had a ton of new people join in on our community to talk games, anime, our thoughts

and opinions on them.

I'm thankful for each and every one of you.

& I'm ecstatic you guys seem to be enjoying the channel and the stuff we make!

I just wanted to use a bit of time to say that, and to let you guys know, that if you

REALLY like the things we do and would like to contribute to our ability to make it better

and more of it you can go to gaming.youtube.com/fanatixfour and sponsor us!

This will give YOU access to our custom sub badge and the ability to use a new emote (let

us know in the comments what emotes you would like.)

& know that if you're not able, or unwilling that's cool!

We appreciate whatever support you give whether you choose to sponsor or just watching these

videos!

Ok, I'm gonna move onto the video now.

Like many of you, I'm sure.

I've been playing through Pokemon Ultra Sun.

I like it fine, it's what I expected, but, I'd be lying if I said it was perfect.

That's not the game's fault.

Like I said, I knew what it was going to be, a mix between the traditional Pokemon Yellow,

Crystal, Emerald, etc. sort of thing & the newer approach being Pokemon Black 2 & White

2.

I knew the story would be the same at a lot of points with changes here and there, new

post game stuff, some new Pokemon.

Nothing major, and that's fine.

MY problem is with the kinks I see in the series armor caused by the hardware it's

running on.

3DS is holding is holding 3DS back, really, it always has since the first 3DS games we're

released.

Pokémon has already been too taxing on the hardware since the first release.

Fast forward to now & that strain is even more apparent.

The loading screens, the frame drops, the slow battle transitions all are a byproduct

of a series that WANTS to push forward on a platform that hasn't moved forward enough

for that franchise.

The games themselves are incredible & quite the feat considering the anemic processors

& sub-480p screen which, normally is to service the 3D no one uses (except for me.

Sometimes.

Look, KID ICARUS LOOKED COOL IN 3D!

SUE ME!)

In Pokemon on 3DS EVEN THAT doesn't work!

& I'm not a specs are graphics stickler, but, it's clear what Game Freak wants to

do for Pokemon is too much for 3DS to handle.

This is why I'm glad Ultra Sun & Moon are 3DS's last hurrah.

The biggest thing that game did for me is inform me even further of what I think Game

Freak should use the extra horsepower for.

First of all, let's get all of the quality of life stuff out of the way.

We need a seamless world.

There's no reason for loading screens (no matter how brief) in between every town, route,

city, or cave.

We should be able to see the game's world on the horizon "if you see it you can go

there" is standard for Switch's big single player focused releases so far.

If Mario can have vast open spaces, a JRPG like Pokémon should have one too.

& I also think the Switch's extra horsepower should be used to improve the visuals, but,

not in the way many have been saying.

I want Pokemon for Switch to be SUPER cartoon-ish.

Make it as close to the anime's art style as humanly possible.

Could you imagine a Pokemon game in the Pokemon Origins art style?

It would be the visual refresh a lot of fans have been asking for, it wouldn't be as

taxiing as the ultra realistic art style many of them want, & most importantly for Switch

it would be scaleable for the best possible looking docked and handheld mode visuals.

A anime style being pared down for handheld mode wouldn't be as noticeable as a realistic

one.

I also think Pokémon should be visible within that new beautiful world.

Random encounters don't really add to the experience & they aren't really consistent

with the world in the way they're currently done.

Tall grass isn't tall enough to conceal most Pokémon.

They should be visible in the over world.

It'll make the Pokémon world that much more realized, add more strategy to traversal,

& cut down on a lot of the needless tedium that comes part in parcel with random encounters

in the classic way.

Switch has the horsepower to render better representations of the Pokémon in the wild

it should make use of that.

SPEAKING OF WHICH!

I know this doesn't fall under quality of life, so time to move on, because it needs

to be said, despite the fact that I've been beating this drum for a while, LET OUR POKÉMON

FOLLOW US!

JEEZ! & while you're at it, add things that allow us to interact in a meaningful way with

our Pokémon.

I think it would be awesome if being a trainer meant having a skill set that levels up while

you become better at caring for your Pokémon.

Craft potions, make their food, more directly help them learn attacks.

Ever see the work Ash puts into teaching his Pokémon new moves?

It'd be cool if they made move tutoring a gameplay mechanic & not just a few button

presses.

The trainer leveling system could operate like a skill tree.

The more you fish and experience you gain, the better fishing equipment you unlock which

can lead to finding better Pokemon to catch and the higher fisherman class you earn.

That would tie into the idea I talked about in my last Pokemon for Switch video.

Trainer classes having a skill tree would maybe mean that becoming a gym leader would

require a certain level in particular skills same with being a Breeder which could allow

for better Pokemon food that could help you EV train easier, or Professor that could give

you the ability to find rarer Pokemon a bit easier, or a Coordinator which could allow

for you to be better at improvising combo attacks, which, I'll get to when I talk

about the battling system.

& speaking of deeper mechanics, I think the battling system needs tweaking even if that's

something as simple as spinning off a separate additional style of battle similar to what

was done with double battles, inverse battles, things like that.

These tweaks should add more agency to the battling system.

Add environmental combos like this.

Or improvised techniques like this.

Or this.

A simple turn based system robs the Pokemon games of a lot of the charm that I feel is

present in not only the animated series, but in the manga and even card game.

It made sense that the handheld games up to this point kept it simple.

They weren't capable of translating this to the battle system in some way.

It can barely handle the pre scripted nature of it's battle system as is.

Imagine how poorly it would work if you throw in the ability to tell your Pokemon when they

should try to dodge, jump, attack from different angles and vantage points.

It would be a mess running on 3DS.

But, imagine a Xenoblade or Ni No Kuni style battling system on Switch?

It would be a great shot in the arm for the series and making it optional would keep the

current meta for the classic play style in tact.

I think there's even a potential for a system like this being embraced by the competitive

community.

It would minimize a lot of the RNG that's present in the classic style.

That's not to say I think it ALL should become skill based in this way and free of

luck based mechanics.

Things like HAX and random chances to miss (although I think it should make more visual

sense, maybe the Pokemon loses control of their attack or misjudges the distance needed

or something like that.)

Just the occasional random "you missed" every now and again isn't really acceptable

when you can give a believable reason WHY we missed on screen.

+2 evasiveness because of double team?

represent that on screen by showing afterimages of the affected Pokemon and increase the effect

visually as the status increases.

Same with poison or burn.

Give the Pokemon animations of looking sick or for when they're burned have them occasionally

wince and grab the burn mark.

Give Pokemon better body language that can tie into and match their nature and characteristics.

Y'know.

Typical Nintendo level Polish.

Pokemon being on Switch could also bolster the online offerings with the new possibility

to maybe have the fabled persistent shared world between players?

Travel around with a few of your friends Ash, Misty, and Brock style?

It may be tough to pull off, but I think it's possible.

At the very least they'll make current online functionality for Pokemon games smoother and

more feature packed.

Trading could be faster they could blow up GTS and give us a better system because GTS

is garbage.

I also think Switch Online may add even more to the equation, but, I'll leave my thoughts

on Switch Online for a separate video.

Subscribe to this channel if you want to hear more on that.

I understand this a lot of this is making the game a lot deeper than most of the main

line games and I know I'll get a ton of comments about Pokemon being for kids and

this being too intricate for them, but, I disagree.

I don't think games that are meant to be approachable for kids need to be dumbed down.

Kids should be given access to media that doesn't pander and I think Pokemon is a

good place to go for that kind of entertainment.

& for anyone skeptical of their incentive to do THIS much for a Pokemon game, consider

this, no one could've predicted Breath of the Wild.

That game changed pretty much everything for Zelda.

There have been rumblings within the industry that Game Freak has been wanting to give Pokemon

a similar shakeup I think these changes in addition to the ones I talked about in the

last video I mentioned before could be an AWESOME way to give Pokemon a similar boost

in the right direction.

Secondly, Pokemon is the most profitable I.P IN THE WORLD.

Even more profitable than Star Wars.

A media conglomerate that's several years its senior.

I think they should do a better job of acting like it.

Be trailblazers give us features that no one would expect.

Make the world that they created that much more detailed and fully realized.

I know FOR A FACT it would pay off for them in droves because, really no matter what they

do, Pokemon for Switch will be the best selling game on the platform without a doubt.

But those are MY thoughts.

What do YOU think?

What does Pokemon for Switch need to do to really wow you Breath of the Wild style?

Are you happy as is?

Let me know what you think and why in the comments!

If you liked this video make sure to let me know by subscribing and clicking like.

& if you LOVED it share it with someone you know that has some good ideas for Pokemon

on Switch.

Or maybe that's just excited by the idea.

New videos here every Tuesday and Thursday 4pm Eastern Time.

Click the bell next to the subscribe button to be notified!

Ok, that's it for me.

See you next week.

For more infomation >> Pokemon Switch is the MOST IMPORTANT Game Since Pokemon Red & Blue - Duration: 10:23.

-------------------------------------------

Justice League NEWS Zack Snyder's Cut of Justice League Exists And Is Finished!? Superman Updates - Duration: 5:59.

What Is Good Youtube Warstu here with a video of the Justice League movie so

by now you most likely would have seen the Justice League movie me personally I

seen it over one and we go so everyone's had a good chance to watch the Justice

League movie I've personally watched it twice I did enjoy it though it is

apparent to everyone that this isn't eight zack snyder movie at all i don't

know what moving was it's a combination of warriors and a combination of the

reshoots that joss whedon it took so there is a fan appeal for Zack Snyder's

cut of the movie to actually come out a lot of fans once it there's a fan of

people had a very good source multiple sources are confirming that from a

direct source that as Zacks I cut off the Justice League movie does actually

exist and mostly finished v XA xB X X and junkie XL score so what this is

Talas this tells that they could release an extended blu-ray version just like

they did all the battle vs. uma I don't know if you watched the extended cut but

the extended cut of Batman vs Superman was received a lot more so originally

the movie was meant to be 2 hours and 45 minutes

but due to the CEO cannon we only got a 2 hour movie there was so many changes

movie yes I know his axe 9 it did shoot most of the movie but they did the

research they changed a lot of his seeds the movie did end how it was supposed to

end and super dick return how he was supposed to return he was supposed to

come out evil he was supposed to be manipulated by Steppenwolf we are

supposed to see Darkseid there was so many things we didn't see we were

supposed to see the black suit and also to add feel to the fire

Zack Snyder himself liked other vero from the user Fiona dc+ said

to sign the petition keep it going and Zacks ina liked it so it's a bit of

parrot that he really does what his own interpretation of his movie to come out

it's a bit weird that he's got a record saying that to be honest guys he hasn't

even watched his own movie that tells us how far apart from the actual movie he

was going to release to actually what come out if you are a proper fan you

will owe that the Justice League movie is the end of a three-part Superman

trilogy obviously Superman being reborn into the Justice League movie but this

isn't really what we've got I was happy with what we got so to speak within to

just see movie but what I'm saying guys is it could have been a lot better and a

Zack Snyder version would be pretty awesome the only problem with that is if

we get a sack Snyder version with more Deathstroke more dark side while

Steppenwolf more acrobat it will have to kind of record the real ended that that

most people are going to see in the cinema for the just thing as Darkseid

didn't turn up in the version that the air in the cinema although everyone

knows that that I was supposed to have some involvement with sue rad there was

no end of cyborg scenes of cut it would just hit make senses about the stuff

that cut why would they film all this extra footage not to show

worst case scenario we're going to get some deleted seeds

even delete the scene section of the extended blu-ray or the extended 4k

ultra release so that's a good thing although if we don't actually get these

scenes in context with might get some deleted scenes so everything is looking

interesting guys let me know do you want a Zack Snyder cut I think it would be

awesome at recently they have updated the Justice League banner with Superman

in it I feel like they have missed a massive opportunity

not probably super before had but I understand they want to be clear

continuity they want to be consistent obviously super might be dead he could

be in the promotion material but a lot of people did know who's gonna be the

movie I had people texted me bus with me is super I gotta be in a movie

because in tail of the New York Comic Con trailer they didn't advertise super

anywhere inside this movie and I think it did hurt the movie blasphemy

obviously these reshoots obviously have the movie as well because they changed

the main narrative of the story you've got big youtubers you've got big

bloggers saying that this isn't exact silent movie I did say a raccoon saying

that all these reshoots weren't going to change much and I probably gone reco

said I was wrong reshoots changed so much the movie to the point where we

have to see the real movie there's a petition with over eighty five thousand

signatures on it I'm gonna put the thing down below we need as Zack it's not a

cut no this is not disrespecting just Whedon it's just it is a psych silent

movie he also credited as the director and it does say a lot if the director

hasn't either watch the movie so guys let me know comment box down below

would you like a Zack Snyder original cut do you think they should air at the

cinemas in a few months if this is the case because it seems like it's mostly

done anyway guys please like subscribe and comment that will be awesome and

I'll see you in and that notification crew down below and I will see you soon

guys catch ya later

For more infomation >> Justice League NEWS Zack Snyder's Cut of Justice League Exists And Is Finished!? Superman Updates - Duration: 5:59.

-------------------------------------------

California Man is Traveling in a Homemade Rocket to Find Out if Earth is Flat - Duration: 0:57.

For more infomation >> California Man is Traveling in a Homemade Rocket to Find Out if Earth is Flat - Duration: 0:57.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: Mueller Busted In Nasty Plot, This Is Urgent. - Duration: 3:49.

BREAKING: Mueller Busted In Nasty Plot, This Is Urgent.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been raising eyebrows since he began his investigation

into Russia's alleged interference in the 2016 election.

Many have been concerned that he would exceed his mandate and look into matters unrelated

to Russia.

According to Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Mueller is doing exactly what many have feared.

In an appearance on Outnumbered Overtime on Fox News, Dershowitz, a lifelong Democrat,

stated that Mueller is "going well beyond his authority as a prosecutor."

According to Dershowitz, Mueller is treating President Donald Trump's constitutional

actions as if they were crimes.

This is part of his attempts to determine whether or not President Trump obstructed

Justice.

The Special Counsel recently requested documents regarding the firing of former-FBI Director

James Comey from the Justice Department.

He is also looking into Attorney General Jeff Sessions' recusal from the Russia investigation.

Mueller plans to interview a number of White House officials.

Dershowitz repeated his assertion that the constitution gives the president the authority

to fire the FBI Director.

"The President is entitled to fire the head of the FBI," he said.

"The president is entitled to direct his attorney general who to investigate, who not

to."

The law professor also stated that presidents have possessed this authority for hundreds

of years.

"That's what the law has been since Thomas Jefferson," Dershowitz said.

He argued that if this is to be changed, it must be done through legislation.

"I don't see that the prosecutor should have a right to turn a constitutionally protected

act of the president into a crime by speculating on what his motive might have been," he

said, adding, "These are political sins if they are sins at all.

They are not crimes."

Dershowitz believes that Mueller is going to try to find evidence of wrongdoing through

one of Mr. Trump's associates.

He stated that the Special Counsel would indict people with knowledge of the Trump campaign

and pressure those people into disclosing potentially damaging information about the

President.

If Dershowitz is right, Mueller is playing a dangerous game.

The law professor stated that when people are targeted in this way, they may make exaggerated

claims to get a better plea deal.

He says this happens because these individuals know that "the better the evidence, the

sweeter the deal."

Dershowitz also argued that there is no reason to investigate either President Trump or Hillary

Clinton, but he does believe that a bipartisan commission should look into Russia's influence

on elections.

Traditionally, Special Counsels have taken great latitude in their investigations of

specific issues.

Has Special Counsel Mueller's investigation gone outside his authority?

Is Robert Mueller Over-Stepping His Authority?

If Mueller is going beyond the scope of his mandate, it could cause problems for the Trump

administration.

As seen previously, special counsels tend to investigate matters for which they were

not appointed, and it could lead to serious issues.

Many have expressed their concerns that Mueller's investigation is designed to damage the President,

not discover more information about Russia's meddling in the 2016 election.

If Mueller's investigation is politically motivated, it may not only cause problems

for President Trump, but also for the Special Counsel himself.

As time goes on, Mueller's actions show that this probe could be nothing more than

the witch hunt many already believe it to be.

This could mean that the results of the investigation might be questioned by the GOP as well as

others.

Either way, that knowledge is unknown until the Special Counsel concludes his investigation.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

Top Stories Today.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: Mueller Busted In Nasty Plot, This Is Urgent. - Duration: 3:49.

-------------------------------------------

ji ho + se hee (out of nowhere) | because this is my first life - Duration: 1:16.

If it's okay...

Let's go together...

I'll be with you...

For more infomation >> ji ho + se hee (out of nowhere) | because this is my first life - Duration: 1:16.

-------------------------------------------

IRAN vs USA: Is the Nuclear Deal in Danger? - VisualPolitik EN - Duration: 14:23.

While everybody has their eyes on North Korea, another nuclear program still worries those

in the White House.

That is the nuclear program of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

This country has such a bad reputation that when we talk about it, it can feel like we're

talking about one of those places that only exists in the movies, one of those countries

 dominated by evil leaders who dream of destroying the world...

Well, there might be some truth to this, but definitely not as much as some seem to think.

In fact, Iran is not the most religious, authoritarian or the most hostile towards women place in

this part of the world.

Saudi Arabia is much worse... by far.

Dear viewer, Iran is a country of contradictions, a country whose government claims to work

under a democratic system, but at the same time, everything is under the control of one

man: Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader.

Even though, at first glance, he isn't as scary as his predecessor: Ruhollah Khomeini,

who was scary just to look at…

The truth is Ali Khamenei can't stand anything modern.

For him, modernity might as well have come from Satan himself.

Well... except for nuclear technology, of course.

That explains why in the past few years Iran has been famous for two things:

1.

Being one of the countries, alongside with China, where the most people are executed

every year, and…

2.

Wanting to build their own nuclear bomb.

However, unlike what happened with the North Korean crisis, the US and Iran did reach an

agreement:

In 2015, President Obama lead the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, an agreement to prevent Iran

from obtaining a Nuclear Bomb, and an agreement that many have considered to be one of the

greatest achievements in foreign policy.

Although, to be fair, all signs seem to point to the conclusion that this agreement has

not kept either party satisfied.

The President of the United States, Donald Trump, is pretty clear about his opinion on

the deal: ever since he was a candidate, he has described it as "the worst agreement

ever negotiated".

During his campaign, Trump vowed on many, many occasions that his top priority would

be to put an end to such a catastrophic agreement.

And don´t think it was the typical campaign message that every politician repeats over

and over again but then soon forgets after election, not at all in fact.

During, in his first speech at the UN Assembly, Trump repeated it, loud and clear:

They haven't done so yet, but it is true that both the president and many other members

of the Republican Party loathe, yep, loathe this agreement.

And they do because, among other things, agreements were also signed with North Korea…

And these agreements did not work at all… except for allowing Pyongyang to lay their

hands on the Bomb.

Well, you might be wondering why it is such a controversial agreement.

We'll look into that.

But before we do, let´s take a look at the context in which it was signed.

IRAN: A BUDDING SUPERPOWER?

During the Cold War, it was said that the Russians were so obsessed that they saw a

Chinese man behind every tree.

Something similar might be happening between Iran and the USA:

Since the islamic revolution of Khomeini in 1979, Iran has become one of Washington's

worst enemies.

It has accused Tehran of being the first sponsor of radical and anti-American groups like Hezbollah,

Hamas or the Taliban.

Not to mention the support of the Syrian regime of Bashar Al Asad.

But there is more.

Washington knows very well that Iran isn't just any country…

Look, it's huge.

Iran has more than 80 million inhabitants and one of the greatest amounts of mineral

wealth on Earth.

And, hey, it's not just oil and natural gas, but other minerals like copper, iron,

zinc, uranium, silver...etc.

But yeah, we all know oil and natural gas are especially important.

Well, that is why I want to ask this question: What is the biggest fear of many analysts

in Washington?

Well, that is the sum of Iraq and Iran.

Let me explain.

Both countries are neighbours, have a Shiite majority, and the influence of Tehran on Baghdad

has skyrocketed in the past few years.

Well, if we add up the oil reserves of both countries, the amount is one of the largest

in the world, larger than in Saudi Arabia or Venezuela...

So, coordinated international politics between these two countries would result in a superpower,

outside the control of Washington, of almost 120 million people and many, many natural

resources.

That would be a remarkable amount of influence…

So then, what would happen if Iran got a hold of a nuclear bomb?

On the one hand it would consolidate its role as an international superpower and its influence

over allies, like Iraq.

On the other hand, it would trigger an arms race with Saudi Arabia and the Emirates, countries

that have already said that they won't be left behind if Tehran manages to get a nuclear

bomb.

The result is obvious:

Tension, risk of proliferation, risk of nuclear disaster and also, a loss of American leverage

in the area.

It goes without saying that seeing such radical governments in possession of such powerful

weapons… doesn't exactly make anyone feel very safe.

Well, this was the situation when the agreement was reached in 2015.

THE DEAL

For years, the United States has tried to stop the nuclear program with financial penalties…

but they were useless.

Did they harm the economy in Iran?

Very much, but in no way did they stop the nuclear program…

So… finally, on the 14th of July 2015, the Nuclear Deal was signed.

An agreement with a clear target: to prevent proliferation and make sure Iran only use

nuclear technology to peaceful ends.

However, since then, the deal has suffered harsh attacks.

We're going to have a look at some of the reasons cited by critics of this agreement.

But first, I think now is a good time to think about the circumstances under which this agreement

was signed.

And the first thing we need to know is that the nuclear program in Iran is very, very

advanced.

Look, according to US intelligence, if the agreement was to be broken, Iran could develop

its first nuclear bomb in a matter of months.

This is the way it is today, and it was even truer in 2015 when the Iranian program was

working at its fullest capacity.

That is why I want to take a moment to think about the 3 possible outcomes:

War, agreement, or Iran with nuclear capability…

So, stopping the nuclear program with military intervention would not have been an easy task.

It would have resulted in many victims, the cost for the US would have been prohibitive,

and the US would have had to keep military intervention in the Middle East for decades.

To compare, it estimated that this would be the Iraq's war... multiplied by 5.

Because it's one thing to destroy infrastructure and a very different thing to eliminate the

knowledge a country has to make nuclear bombs.

Obama knew that this scenario was completely impossible.

What he wanted was to get away from the Middle East, and not to get in any more trouble…

involvement in this region has been a chronic nightmare for the United States.

But sure, on the other hand… not doing anything would have meant that Iran would have gotten

their new toy… and as we have seen, it would have resulted in an arms race in the region,

which Washington didn't want either.

So, an agreement was the only option left.

"We make a deal and everybody's happy, right?"

Mmmm, wait there, because despite that, many experts, especially Republicans, don't even

want to hear about this pact.

Are they all just war hawks determined to impose their ideas by force?

Well, maybe there are some like that… but the truth is… they also have a point.

They say (and they are right) that the US already signed many agreements with North

Korea and Pyongyang never kept its word, which is why North Korea is now a nuclear power...

They are convinced that Iran will do the same… and there is no better evidence of it than

this: Iran has not stopped their ballistic missile program.

"Iran is boosting its missile capabilities to order to increase the accuracy, preciseness

and range".

Iran will not stop the missile projects".

Nader Karimi Joni, Irani journalist

And this program is being developed...with North Korean technology...by the way.

So… it seems clear which way a deal with Iran will go.

Besides, since the pact has a limited duration, Iran could still put itself in a position

to get its  arsenal the moment the deal was over--and it could be armed in a matter of

months.

However, as we have seen, the alternatives aren't any better… and you know what?

Iran doesn't necessarily need to go the way of North Korea.

IRAN, BENEFITS OF THE AGREEMENT

I'm sure many of you are thinking that comparing North Korea and Iran is easy.

After all both countries are radical dictatorships, right?

Well, not really.

To be fair...things are a bit different.

Iranian society is much more openminded than North Korean society,

In Iran, there is a well formed middle class, there are political debates, and things like

having a smartphone and access to the internet are quite common.

In fact, most Iranians, especially the younger generation, are clearly pro-agreement.

You see, it's not just a matter of international politics.

It's also a matter of quality of life.

The penalties put in place by the international community were very damaging for Iran.

Look, in 2013, when the president Ahmadinejad, the main defender of the agreement, left power,

the economy of Iran was devastated:

Foreign investment vanished, the unemployment rate skyrocketed, inflation grew to around

40% and expectations for improvement weren't high…

In short, it was a complete mess...

But thanks to the agreement the penalties started to disappear and, and since then,

oil exports have tripled, for example.

I mean, Iran is not North Korea; they need the trade and economic advantages the agreement

has brought.

"The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action will produce the comprehensive lifting of

all UN Security Council sanctions as well as multilateral and national sanctions related

to Iran's nuclear programme, including steps on access in areas of trade, technology, finance,

and energy".

Preface of the deal with Iran.

http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/statements-eeas/docs/iran_agreement/iran_joint-comprehensive-plan-of-action_en.pdf

The hope for Obama´s administration was that with a more prosperous and trade-open Iran,

the younger, more open minded generation would be allowed to take power in a few years.

However, those who oppose the agreement argue it is necessary to be more demanding with

Iran, because otherwise it will eventually become another North Korea, a new nuclear

power.

Anyway, it is not an easy situation as you can see, but, truth be told, I think it would

be a mistake to think that any pact is bad until proven otherwise.

Having Tehran under pressure might be a good strategy, but let's be careful not to go too

far, or we could all lose.

So, now it is your turn: If you were the President of the United States, what would you do deal

with Iran?

Leave your answer in the comments as well as in the survey.

I really hope you enjoyed this video, please hit like if you did and don't forget to

subscribe to our channel for brand new videos every Monday and Thursday.

Also, don't forget to check out our friends at the Reconsider Media Podcast they provided

the vocals in this episode that were not mine!

And if you are looking for something else to watch, check out my brand new channel Biographics!

And as always, thanks for watching!

For more infomation >> IRAN vs USA: Is the Nuclear Deal in Danger? - VisualPolitik EN - Duration: 14:23.

-------------------------------------------

Drama - God is Almighty, God is Great | Hindi Skit - Duration: 5:14.

Drama - God is Almighty

Drama - God is Almighty, God is Great

Hindi Skit

Drama - God is Almighty, God is Great | Hindi Skit

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét