Chủ Nhật, 5 tháng 8, 2018

Waching daily Aug 5 2018

Hey, everyone! I hope y'all are having a great day and today I'm bringing you a

book review. Yes, I too forgot that I do that sometimes. Today I'm reviewing

Eleanor Oliphant is Completely Fine by Gail Honeyman. Surprise, surprise--it's not

YA. It is in fact an adult fiction novel about a woman named Eleanor who

lives an extremely mundane life. She wants so desperately to be normal after

a childhood traumatic event that left half of her face scarred, but when she

falls in love with a musician from afar and also when she saves the life of an

old man with the help of her fellow employee, Raymond,

her life begins to change and she starts to reconcile things that she's repressed

for so long in order for her to actually be completely fine. I actually picked

this book up when I was in Lisbon, Portugal. I was in the living room of the

hostel that I was staying at and I was waiting for dinner to be ready. And the

living room had a library, so I browsed the library and I found Eleanor Oliphant

is Completely Fine and this is a book that I'd heard good things about

before and I had it on my "to-read" list on Goodreads and so I decided to take it

out of the shelf and read it for a little bit. And during my total stay

there, I only got about 30 pages in before I had to return the book and

leave. So I got a copy when I came back to the States so that I could finish

reading it and here we are. I really thoroughly enjoyed this book.

There was a time maybe halfway into the book where I suddenly fell into this

reading groove and I could not put this book down. And it's not that the first

half of this novel wasn't enjoyable, but there was just this time where I was in

this mood, near the middle, where I did not want to be separated from the story if I

could help it. This book isn't really for everyone, I don't think. Eleanor Oliphant

is a very odd, very strange character, and I don't think that it's unlikely that

there might be readers out there who find her very off-putting by her

sentiments and the way that she speaks. The writing is very stiff, very formal.

Gail Honeyman infuses Eleanor with an extremely elaborate and formal

vocabulary. For example, Eleanor uses the word "comestibles" instead of "food" or

"micturate" instead of "urinate." Like, there are common terms that she has

swapped out for elaborate alternates and so I really learned a lot of new words

while reading this book. Eleanor is extremely socially awkward due to her

lack of human-on-human interaction and so it

does take some getting used to, to the tone and to her mindset. At first, it

might turn a reader off like it did to me because sometimes she is offensive.

But then you understand that she never really learned these sets of rules, at

least not in a social learning environment, but you do get to see her

growth as the novel goes on and once you get used to it, once you get used to her,

Eleanor is actually really funny. I want to read you a few funny passages so

that you can get a sense of the humor-- see whether whether you jive with it or

not. "In primary school, sports day was the one day of the year when the less

academically gifted students could triumph, winning prizes for jumping

fastest in a sack, or running from Point A to Point B more quickly than their

classmates. How they loved to wear those badges on their blazers the next day! As

if a silver in the egg-and-spoon race was some sort of compensation for not

understanding how to use an apostrophe." Or there's this one: "'I thought I'd found

the perfect person for me,' he said, staring at the back of the garden. 'Didn't

work out, though.' 'Why not?' I said, although I could, in fact, think of many reasons

why someone might not want to be with Raymond." And then this last one: "During

the next free-form jigging section, I started to wonder why the band was

singing about, presumably, the Young Men's Christian Association, but then,

from my very limited exposure to popular music, people did seem to sing about

umbrellas and fire-starting and Emily Bronte novels, so, I supposed, why not a

gender- and faith-based youth organization?" Also some of her descriptions

of things are just so hilarious and I grew to love seeing the world through

Eleanor's eyes. Like there's this description of a person: "She wasn't

actually chewing gum, but her demeanor was very much that of a gum chewer."

Eleanor was just so offbeat and gradually I found that to be very funny and

endearing, but I can't guarantee that to every reader. The writing in this book is

excellent. I found the characters to be so rich and vivid. The plot might not be

the most exciting, but this book is definitely about development and

growth and that is, I think, what makes it so satisfying to read. There is a

plotline involved in the book that's kind of uncovering the mystery of what

happened to Eleanor as a child and I thought that there

were enough hints dropped throughout the novel that you can kind of piece

together what happened, but there are still some surprises left for you at the

end. Although sometimes the book does get pretty dark, I think for the most part

the story just holds so much warmth and heart. Overall, I'm so pleasantly

surprised at how much I enjoyed Eleanor Oliphant is Completely Fine. I mean, I'd

heard good things about it since it was released and like I said, I had it on my

"to-read" list on Goodreads, but I never really envisioned myself picking it up, I

guess. But I'm really glad I did. It was so worth it. It's such a bizarre and

unusual but excellent book, and it's impressive, especially considering it's

the debut novel of the author, and I'm so keen to see what else Gail Honeyman has

cooking up in the future. Now I'm going to go into a quick spoiler section for

Eleanor Oliphant is Completely Fine, so if you haven't read this book and you

don't wish to be spoiled, I'd advise leaving in 3... 2... 1...

Bye!

Okey dokey, I just want to talk about a quick couple of things, first being the

mystery of what happened to Eleanor as a child. So you quickly gather the fact

that she was in a fire and that's why she has burn scars on her face, and as

the book goes on, you learn that she doesn't have siblings now but that she

used to have a sister and you kind of piece together that her sister died in

the fire. But what still shocked me at the end was that her mother was dead the

entire time. I guess I never even considered that to be a possibility. The

phone calls were written in a way that just felt so real, you know? Because the

mother would address other people supposedly in the environment or the

institution that she was in and she'd be, like, talking to other people and she talked

about the fact that they chose to watch the same movie every week. And so

those details made it feel like it was real and it never occurred to me that

that Eleanor could be imagining these phone calls with her dead mother. The

section where Eleanor is dangerously intoxicated and on the verge of suicide

was such a dark time and it was actually really, really scary to read. I was

reading it late at night in the dark and it was honestly so much more terrifying

to me than a typical horror story would be. Like, I felt so relieved when Raymond

came in and rescued her. Raymond is such an angel, I loved him so much. He's an

incredible person. Which brings me to Raymond and Eleanor's relationship.

I loved how it was a beautiful platonic relationship between a man and a woman,

but then as the novel went on, I was like, "Oh, wait... is this turning romantic?" Like

Eleanor would really enjoy whenever Raymond would put a hand on her or she

would really like when he embraced her, and she would get jealous when she saw

him and Laura together. So I was like, maybe Eleanor is developing a genuine

crush on him? I'm not sure if that's the direction Gail Honeyman intended to

direct them towards beyond the end of the novel. I don't know. I love their

platonic relationship so much, but I guess I wouldn't be that mad if it

turned romantic eventually. I don't know, what are your thoughts? Do you think

Gail Honeyman was hinting that they were going to be an item later on in the

road? Are they just friends? And yeah, I think those are the only spoilery things

that I wanted to mention. I really enjoyed this book, y'all. It was really

quirky and I usually hate the word quirky--I think it's very irritating and

it always reminds me of Zooey Deschanel, whom I do not enjoy--but this book was

quirky in a heartwarming way. I'm very glad I chose to read it. If you've read

this book, please let me know your thoughts on it. I would love to hear them.

Thanks so much for watching! I hope y'all have a fantastic day, and happy

reading! Bye!

For more infomation >> BOOK REVIEW: ELEANOR OLIPHANT IS COMPLETELY FINE BY GAIL HONEYMAN - Duration: 7:57.

-------------------------------------------

This 26-Year-Old Baseball Player With Autism Is An Inspiration On The Field | Sunday TODAY - Duration: 3:29.

For more infomation >> This 26-Year-Old Baseball Player With Autism Is An Inspiration On The Field | Sunday TODAY - Duration: 3:29.

-------------------------------------------

This Week In Trek - Picard is BACK! - Duration: 5:40.

Hello friends, it's finally time for another episode of "This Week In Trek".

This video will contain just 2 short news, so it's going to be pretty

short today.

The first news is what we expected, several sources have confirmed, that Discovery season

2 will include Spock.

But unfortunately it is supposed to be a completely different Spock that we all

know and love.

That makes no sense.

This is supposed to take place AFTER The Cage, where we have already

seen Spock, and he was already the same Spock which we have

seen in the original series.

There was just one small difference - when he played with the blue plants,

he smiled.

That was the only difference between The Cage Spock and TOS Spock.

But now we will see a completely different Spock?

Well, no, thanks, that's not for me.

No information right now if they will use Zachary Quinto,

or a third actor.

But the next news is bigger, and hopefully better.

Yesterday in Las Vegas Alex Kurtzman arrived on stage together

with a special guest - Sir Patrick Stewart.

A few weeks back when Stewart was interviewed, he was asked if he

has seen Star Trek Discovery.

His response was a mysterious "no, but I might have soon a very good reason

to watch it".

Of course fans have immediately speculated that he will appear on the Discovery, probably

as an ancestor of Jean-Luc Picard.

A few weeks later news broke out that Kurtzman has signed a new deal with

CBS and that he will create and produce several new Star Trek products.

One of the planned products was rumored to be a Captain Picard mini-series.

So now we have received an official confirmation from both Kurtzman and

Stewart - Jean-Luc Picard is officially BACK.

However even this makes me a bit nervous, Stewart said that because

it's been almost 2 decades, the "new" Picard will probably not be the same man we knew,

and that he may not be a captain anymore.

While I am perfectly OK with the idea of him not being in command of the Enterprise E anymore,

I think that him being an admiral, or an ambassador could be interesting, I don't really like

the mentioning of him not being the same man we know.

If they want to change even his character, why bring him back at all?

Why not create some completely new character?

I want to see Picard back, but I want to see OUR Picard back,

not some new character played by Patrick Stewart.

Now according to Discovery writer / producer Ted Sullivan,

the new series launched from the mind of Discovery writer and a famous novelist Kirsten Beyer.

I personally never read anything from her, but there seems

to be a general consensus that her Trek novels are great,

so I hope she will have a loud voice in the creation of the stories of the new show.

By the way, yes, I call it simply "the new show".

All we know so far is that it's going to star Sir Patrick Stewart as Jean-Luc Picard.

We don't know when it will air and if it will be shown on TV

or on CBS All Access and Netflix, or how many episodes it will have.

The show is still in very early pre-production stage, so they probably don't

know it themselves yet.

But Stewart also said that he has recently re-watched The Next Generation as a kind of

preparation for his role, which means that he will probably want to

keep the character as close to the original as possible.

And the good thing is that it will be post-Nemesis, which is exactly what a huge part of the fandom

wanted.

I honestly don't know what to think.

A part of me is incredibly excited to see Patrick Stewart again in

the role, which made him an international superstar, but at the same time a more cynical

part of me expects that they will mess it up somehow.

I simply don't trust anything which has Alex Kurtzman attached.

But I am quite famous to be negative, so what do you think?

Are you excited or nervous?

Do you plan to watch the new show?

Let me know down in the comments section, if you liked this video hit that thumbs up

button, and if you have some free time feel free to watch

any of the other videos you see on screen right now, thanks a lot

for watching, and see you soon.

Bye.

For more infomation >> This Week In Trek - Picard is BACK! - Duration: 5:40.

-------------------------------------------

Joanna Krupa is married | National Arts & Entertainment - Duration: 2:53.

For more infomation >> Joanna Krupa is married | National Arts & Entertainment - Duration: 2:53.

-------------------------------------------

The latest 0rg4sm trend among women, what is it? - Duration: 3:01.

The latest orgasm trend among women, what is it?

Orgasm is the culmination of having sex.

It is known that women experience it more often than men.

They (women) can orgasm even before there is penetration.

Well, interesting is not it?

Therefore, this topic has always been an exciting thing to discuss.

Lately there is a new trend related to female orgasm that supposedly can be obtained even

without having sex!

The trick is simple, they only need to hold their pee for a while to get a sensation like

an orgasm.

That's why this trend is called peegasm.

However, medical practitioners, especially doctors warn of the dangers of this orgasm

trend.

The reason, this trend can trigger a painful urinary tract infection, quoted from the page

of the Daily Star.

This orgasm trend also emerged from an article on the Reddit site.

One of the social media account users said his partner experienced the sensation of orgasm

after urination.

And, the method was deemed successful.

"My partner recently said, if she held her pee for a while and then pee, she often felt

a sensation of orgasm that spread to the spine to the head," the man wrote.

"If my partner does the opposite movement of Kegel when pee, orgasm is even more likely

to be felt," he continued.

The article immediately received a response from women.

Some of the women claimed to be climaxing with the same technique.

"Yes, it feels like a sensation of massage throughout the body.

Often I feel it when I wake up at night to pee," wrote one woman.

While other women also commented, "I feel the same way, but it's not really orgasm,

it's just a really pleasant feeling."

Although some women claim to feel pleasure, but some have denied it.

They claim it is not a pleasure, but a feeling of pain.

Therefore, this trend is not recommended to be tried at home by experts.

Because holding back the urine can damage the urinary tract.

So, if you feel like urinating, then hurry up, don't hold back anymore.

Well, that's the The latest orgasm trend among women article.

So, which rules resonate with you better and which ones didn't?

Really cool information isn't it.

Leave us a comment down below and let us know what your thought of this video.

Don't forget to give us account subs and watch other amazing videos on our channel.

Thanks for watching!

For more infomation >> The latest 0rg4sm trend among women, what is it? - Duration: 3:01.

-------------------------------------------

How to Watch 'Who is America' Episode 4 Without Cable | Heavy.com - Duration: 3:42.

How to Watch 'Who is America' Episode 4 Without Cable | Heavy.com

New episode, new victims.

It's time for Episode 4 of Sacha Baron Cohen's new hit series, Who is America?.

Episode 4 will air Sunday, August 5, at 10 p.m.

ET/PT on Showtime.

Even if you don't have cable or can't get to a TV, you can watch a live stream of Who is America? (or DVR it, or watch it on-demand) on your computer, phone or streaming device by signing up for a free trial of one of the following cable-free, live-TV streaming services.

Amazon Prime.

If you have Amazon Prime or want to start a free 30-day trial of Amazon Prime, you can watch all Showtime content through the Showtime Amazon Channel, which also comes with a free 7-day trial.

Once you're signed up for both Amazon Prime and the Showtime channel, you can then watch Who is America? either live as it airs or on-demand (episodes are available on-demand Sundays at 10 p.m.

ET).

With either option, you can watch on your computer via the Amazon website, or on your phone, tablet or streaming device via the Amazon Video app.

FuboTV.

Showtime live and on-demand content can be added to your existing FuboTV subscription, or you can include Showtime when you start a free 7-day trial.

Once signed up, you can either watch Who is America? episodes live as they air, or you can watch them on-demand anytime after.

With either option, you can watch on your computer via the FuboTV website, or on your phone, tablet or streaming device via the FuboTV app.

Whether you already have Hulu or you want to sign up for a new subscription, Showtime is available as an add-on to Hulu or Hulu with Live TV.

Once signed up, you can watch Who is America? episodes live as they air, or you can watch them on-demand anytime after.

With either option, you can watch on your computer via the Hulu website, or on your phone, tablet or streaming device via the Hulu app.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét