Thứ Sáu, 3 tháng 11, 2017

Waching daily Nov 3 2017

so what is the new feature that we are releasing within vet angel pet angel

already contains absolutely superb manual trading tools

it also contains absolutely amazing and advanced automation you can do pretty

much anything you want with vet angel manually or automatically so what could

we have introduced that takes that to another level let me introduce you to a

servant by introducing a servant what we're doing is we're giving you the

flexibility of manual trading but the power of advanced automation the

advanced automation can do so many things so quickly that's impossible for

somebody to do manually however there are many moments when you need to make a

judgement of when and when that starts and stops and on what selection and by

using a servant you can get the power of using advanced automation but the

flexibility of manual trading so what's the key concept behind a servant well

imagine being able to perform actions really really quickly and on a number of

different runners at the touch of a keystroke you control what you're doing

you decide what you're doing we hand over responsibility to a servant to

actually execute it and that execution could be a trade entry a trade exit

monitoring the market or perhaps looking after some aspect of the market and

warning you if something is wrong that's the key concept behind a servant now

whatever your trading style you'll be looking across the market for

opportunities you may be watching a match you may be watching some sports

unfold in front of you and you'll be making a judgment on what you want to do

so the advantage of using a servant is that it frees your minds to focus on

those opportunities while the actual strategy the position the management of

that position can be delegated to a servant of course one great advantage of

using a servant is speed in the time it takes a conventional trader to make a

decision and to deploy whatever they're attempting to do the servant will have

been in and out of the market in an absolute fashion so obviously speed as a

significant benefit of using a servant so let us say that we are trading a

horse-racing market we can see that the price is moving down the ladder it's

getting closer and closer to the point actually to think it's going to break

right down and very very quickly now we know that we want to catch that break

when it occurs but how could we possibly catch that quickly enough

maybe that break will occur and our opportunity is gone well with a servant

you can tell the servants to look at that point within the market potential

refreshes incredibly quickly up to 20 milliseconds so that's 50 times a second

and you can say to it hey servant look at this particular runner jump on the

market when this occurs or when this is about to occur and in an instant you'll

get exactly the trade that you want in the market way ahead of anybody else so

what can you do where they servant well you could use 1 to iceberg and order

into an illiquid market perhaps you want to identify gap within a market

basically what I'm saying here is that a servant can do so many things it's

pretty much impossible to name them all they will allow you to do such a wide

and diverse range of things the best thing for you to do is to see an example

you

For more infomation >> Bet Angel - New feature - What is a Servant? - Duration: 3:43.

-------------------------------------------

Why Accessible Video is Good Video - Duration: 11:09.

JOSH MILLER: Welcome.

Thank you for coming.

So we're 3Play Media.

We're a captioning, transcription, subtitling,

audio description company.

We're in the video accessibility space.

We are all about really making the process easier

for publishers and institutions that

are putting content up online.

And that's a really important part to all of this,

and then really reducing the barrier

to making content accessible, because that's

really important.

AUDIENCE: Woo.

JOSH MILLER: Yeah.

What today is all about is really about education

and sharing best practices, sharing stories, and being

able to hopefully learn a little bit about making content

accessible and why it's important and how to tackle it.

So one thing you'll see on our website

is a number of resources.

These are all free.

We definitely encourage people to check them out.

We're going to be posting sessions from today

on our website as well.

So please, please do feel free to check that out.

In addition to the how-to guides,

we've really been working quite a bit on industry research

and kind of how are institutions tackling this challenge.

What about the viewers?

What do the students say in the education space?

This is something we are going to be doing more and more on as

well because that is also really important.

A lot of what we're going to be talking about today

is somewhat related to accommodation.

One of the messages we really want to deliver

is why accessible video is actually

just better video for everyone.

So let's talk about that.

So first, captioning.

Let's all make sure we're on the same page.

Captions originated in the 1980s for broadcast television.

So if we look at--

it's a little hard to see this image here--

but this is a still frame of a show.

And if you look at it, you can't really tell what's going on.

In fact, it might be nothing, but it might be something.

If you turn the captions on, if you weren't hearing

what was happening, you'd realize this is actually

a pretty important scene.

And if you watch "Stranger Things,"

you have a really good sense.

Oh, this is actually-- something is about to happen.

And even if you don't watch "Stranger Things,"

seeing this kind of makes you think, what's going on here,

because that's not a normal thing to see.

Clearly there's something happening.

So the other part of captions that I think sometimes

gets left out is that it also is capturing

the non-spoken sounds that are relevant to the plot,

and that's really important.

So why should we caption?

Let's talk about this, because this is really important.

I'm going to try something that we went through yesterday.

How many people here drink coffee?

Great, all right.

How many people here only drink coffee when

you brew it at home yourself?

Wow, that's awesome, so two people, so yeah, totally.

Now the rest of you who are going out and buying coffee

at a coffee shop, you're probably given the choice.

Do you want this for here or to go?

If you were to buy your coffee, and they

handed it to you without any choice

and forced you to drink it how they wanted you to drink it,

you'd say, no, I want it to go.

Or I want to put milk in it, or I want a choice.

You don't want to be forced into consuming your coffee

how they want you to consume it.

Content's the same way, and things have changed.

So I'm sure you'll hear from a number of our speakers

today just how content consumption has changed

over the last few years.

No one here only watches TV on their couch anymore.

We're watching videos on the subway.

We're watching videos while we're walking down the street.

People are watching videos while they're supposed to be working.

I mean, things have just changed dramatically.

And so the idea of why captioning and why

audio description has just dramatically changed,

and it's not just about accommodation.

It's actually about enabling content consumption.

So in a recent study from Facebook,

where now video is king, we saw that--

or they saw that--

captions actually increase viewing time by 12%.

That's a huge increase, especially

if content is your business.

And they also noticed that 41% of the videos

are completely incomprehensible without the sound

or without captions.

Now what's really interesting about Facebook video

is that it's completely changed the way some people are

producing content.

People are actually producing content that's

text-only because of this.

And the other part is that 80% of people

would react negatively to content

that doesn't have captions or sound because it's just

going through your feed.

So let's take a look at that.

So if you're looking at your feed,

and you don't have captions, you just

keep going unless you have your headphones in.

But even then, you have to click on the video and open it up.

It's not a very good user experience,

whereas if you're going through and the captions are there,

you actually stop and start watching.

I've done it myself where I'm sitting there,

I'm just quickly going through my feed.

All of a sudden, I've read a video essentially

for the last two minutes.

And I had no intention of watching it all.

So on the education side, we did a really big study

with Oregon State University.

This student study, which was a nationwide study,

it did not single out students who needed accommodation.

This is just students in general.

98.6%, that's nearly everyone, found captions helpful.

And they use it as a learning aid, for the most part, 75%.

And the number one reason for captions

wasn't because they couldn't hear the content

or that they needed captions.

It was actually to help them focus.

Really interesting.

So, of course, there's the accessibility side,

and we don't want to ignore that,

because that's a very real-- very big reason for this.

But what's interesting is 71% of people with a disability

will leave that website immediately

if it's not accessible.

But there are 48 million people who

are deaf or hard of hearing, 24 million people who are blind

or low vision.

That's a huge population.

So if you go back to the coffee example, what

coffee shop is going to say, we're

going to count off every five people.

No, you just go ahead.

Don't even bother.

That's bad for business.

You wouldn't do that.

So what do these companies have in common?

And not to single any of them out, that's not the point.

But this is the reality of what's happened.

They've all been sued, along with 1,700 other companies,

for a lack of accommodation.

Part of what's happening now is, with the change

in landscape of content, unfortunately

there are organizations that are spending more time trying

to sue people than to help educate and show

how easy it is to actually caption content or describe

content now.

Now, it certainly does bring attention to what's happening.

But then you have to wonder, where is the time better spent?

Is the time better spent in making content more accessible,

or is it better spent on legal fees?

So speech recognition has come a long way over the years.

And so a lot of people ask, well, why can't we just

use speech recognition or the auto captions on YouTube?

So let's take a look at what that is really all about.

[VIDEO PLAYBACK]

SUBJECT 1: One of the most challenging aspects

of choosing a career is simply determining

where our interests lie.

And one common characteristic we saw in the majority of people

we interviewed was a powerful connection

with a childhood interest.

SUBJECT 2: For me, part of the reason why I work here

is, when I was five years old, growing up in Boston,

I went to the New England Aquarium.

And I picked up a horseshoe crab,

and I touched a horseshoe crab.

I still remember that, and I still--

I love--

[END PLAYBACK]

JOSH MILLER: So that's a very clearly recorded piece

of content.

And it did pretty well, but it got some really key words

wrong, and that's the challenge of speech recognition.

So you might be able to get the gist of it,

and it might do pretty well.

But it's going to often get some of those really key words

wrong.

So now are we watching something about the Koran?

No, it's the aquarium, big mistake.

So there are still some things that we need to work on

with speech recognition.

It's come a long way, but it can't stand alone

for this application.

So then the other side of captioning,

or certainly accessible content, is audio description.

So audio description is almost like the inverse,

and the idea is it's for blind and low vision users.

And it provides an auditory support

for what's happening onscreen.

So let's try this.

So I'm going to ask everyone to close their eyes for a second

and try to follow along.

[VIDEO PLAYBACK]

[MUSIC PLAYBACK]

[LAUGHS]

SUBJECT 3: Ah, ooh, hello.

[GIGGLES]

[SNIFFS]

Ah.

Eh, ah.

[GRUNTS]

[END PLAYBACK]

JOSH MILLER: OK.

Now we're going to do the same clip,

but with audio descriptions.

So keep your eyes closed.

I'm going to try that again.

[VIDEO PLAYBACK]

SUBJECT 4: From the creators of "Tangled" and "Wreck-It Ralph,"

Disney, a caribou [INAUDIBLE] purple flower peeking out

of deep snow.

SUBJECT 3: Ooh, hello.

[GIGGLES]

[SNIFFS]

SUBJECT 4: He takes a deep sniff.

SUBJECT 3: Ah.

Eh, ah.

SUBJECT 4: His nose lands on a frozen [INAUDIBLE]??

A reindeer looks up and pants like a dog.

SUBJECT 3: Oh.

SUBJECT 4: Seeing a reindeer slip on the ice [INAUDIBLE]..

JOSH MILLER: So you can tell right away,

it's a completely different experience.

If you've got a piece of content that

is extremely visual and maybe not as auditory

in terms of what's being spoken, you

have no clue what's happening.

And so it's really important to consider this as well.

So one of the things-- one of the challenges with audio

description, and one of the reasons why we're not--

a lot of people aren't as aware of it is that it's expensive.

The process has not been built out as well as captioning has.

There hasn't been as much innovation

around it as captioning has over the years.

And because of that, there's been

successful pushback to keep the scale or the requirements

lower.

So this is one of the biggest projects we've

taken on over the last year--

to make it more scalable, to think about what pieces

of technology can be used.

And one of them right now is the idea of synthesized speech.

And what can you do with synthesized speech,

assuming that you've got humans who are doing the writing,

to make sure you've got accurate description

but can start to find ways to make it more scalable.

So that's something that we're spending quite a bit of time

on.

For more infomation >> Why Accessible Video is Good Video - Duration: 11:09.

-------------------------------------------

Jose Mourinho tax case: What is he accused of? What has Man Utd manager said? - Duration: 3:02.

Jose Mourinho tax case: What is he accused of? What has Man Utd manager said?

The Red Devils boss is scheduled to appear before a Madrid court today to answer charges of alleged tax evasion. Here, Starsport answers the key questions surrounding the case.

What is Mourinho alleged to have done? The Spanish authorities opened a case against the 54-year-old in June for alleged tax evasion during his time as Real Madrid boss.

It is claimed he did not declare revenue related to his image rights in 2011 and 2012 and owes the Spanish state around £2.9m.

What has Mourinho said? He has said very little on the matter. His representatives, Gestifute Media, issued a statement in June insisting Mourinho had complied with his tax obligations.

It said Mourinho had paid more than €26m (£23m) in tax in Spain at an average rate of more than 41 per cent and that, in 2015, he had accepted regularisation proposals and a settlement agreement regarding previous years.

The statement continued: The Spanish government in turn, through the tax department, issued a certificate in which it attested that he had regularised his position and was in compliance with all his tax obligations..

Is this an unusual case? Not really. The Spanish authorities have been cracking down on allegations of tax fraud and a number of leading figures in football have been investigated.

Argentinians Angel Di Maria, Javier Mascherano and Lionel Messi have all been punished for tax evasion in recent years, while Cristiano Ronaldo is currently fighting tax fraud charges and strenuously denies wrongdoing.

Messi was fined €2.1m (£1.8m) and received a 21-month prison sentence last year after he and his father were found guilty of defrauding the tax department to the tune of €4.1m (£3.5m). Messi is not expected to serve time in jail.

For more infomation >> Jose Mourinho tax case: What is he accused of? What has Man Utd manager said? - Duration: 3:02.

-------------------------------------------

What is a True Friendyoutube com - Duration: 0:53.

For more infomation >> What is a True Friendyoutube com - Duration: 0:53.

-------------------------------------------

What Happiness Is - Duration: 3:01.

There is a container

in which there is internal happiness; for this guarded with a key that is in a safe

place, I said a safe place. Yes a safe like, yes wait wait I'm not sure you

should, you know lock it. Wait don't no, uhh.

This key is hidden in the safe place to obtain it you should enter the challenge

contestants Daniel Thai from the streets captain commando and nameless together

though in the search of the box with their combined powers

there's nobody stopping them

look what I found give me them what other son it Jesus

electricity to make light either way it's in your sight I found it

I found the key

it's a prank yeah eat him up me too but be the

monkeys eat him up beat him up beat a monkey fuck

princess cut princess fuck eat him up beat him up eat a monkey fuck racist

fucks recess book

For more infomation >> What Happiness Is - Duration: 3:01.

-------------------------------------------

John Kelly is not honorable Rep Gallego MSNBC - Duration: 5:22.

For more infomation >> John Kelly is not honorable Rep Gallego MSNBC - Duration: 5:22.

-------------------------------------------

Ecological Civilization: Is this the answer to fixing China's environment? - Christine Loh - Duration: 1:14:23.

- Good evening and welcome to the

Marian Miner Cook Athenaeum,

my name is Wesley Whitaker,

And I'm one of your Ath fellows this year,

just two weeks ago the San Francisco Bay area,

Suffered some of the worst air quality conditions on record,

as a result of smoke from various fires burning in

Napa, Solano and Sonoma County,

with haze covering the iconic skyline,

and doctors are urging residents to wear a certified

Air purifying mask during prolonged outdoor exposure,

many compared the city to Beijing which has

some of the worst pollution in the world,

While these conditions have subsided as the

fires have become contained,

air quality, specifically dangerous levels of pollutants,

Remain a pressing problem for California,

with six of the 10 most polluted metro

areas in the US located in the state,

In fact the inland empire air-quality district,

That covers San Bernardino and Ontario,

all just a short drive from campus,

find it is unsafe or dangerous to have

prolonged outdoor activity,

For over one third of the year for the past three years.

The recent experiences of residents in the Bay Area

are a rude wakening that something taken so

for granted can be so vital for our existence.

Beyond the air that we breathe,

our years of collective neglect for the

environment have produced other looming threats,

including severe drought,

Soil erosion that threatens our ability to

produce crops from fields that were once teeming,

and polluted oceans containing billions of tons of plastic,

how can we continue to provide adequate standards of life,

in a way that prevents or slows down

this kind of environmental damage,

tonight our speaker, Christine Loh,

will explain China's approach,

Called ecological civilization,

and how it takes into account it's a

logical capacity and constraints when

planning future development,

after receiving a doctorate of law from the

University of Hong Kong,

Christine Loh works as commodities

traders from 1980 to 1991,

where rose to the rank of

managing director and director of business development,

she was then appointed to the Hong Kong

legislative Council in 1992,

where she won two re-election campaigns and

served until the year 2000,

later that year she co-founded Civic Exchange,

a Hong Kong-based non-profit think tank

whose error research focuses on air quality,

nature conservation,

and sustainable urban design and planning,

Time magazine recognized Loh as the prime mover of

Hong Kong's environmental community in 2007,

as part as their heroes of the environment series,

and she was recognized as woman of the year of

2006 by Hong Kong Business Weekly,

Loh stepped down as chief executive of

Civic Exchange in 2012,

upon her appointment as the undersecretary for the

environment in the administration of Se Yi Yung,

where she served until July of this year,

she now serves as adjunct Professor at the

Institute for the Environment,

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology,

Prof Loh's Athenaeum presentation is co-sponsored by the

Keck Institute for International and Strategic Studies,

as always I must remind you that audio and

digital recording is strictly prohibited,

please silence put away your devices at this time,

please join me in welcoming

Christine Loh to the Athenaeum.

(applause)

- Well thank you very much for inviting me to

join you for dinner,

I have not been to Claremont before,

when I came today I had a small opportunity to

walk around your campus,

it's really a very beautiful place,

and one I will recommend to my daughter when she gets older,

what I like to do today,

and I've already been pumped by the students on

questions about China's environment and the

politics of the environment in China,

so I hope to be able to give you a

perspective that you may not have heard before,

I come from somebody who cares about the environment,

who's worked in the environment for a very long time,

who has often in very angry about how we

allow our environment to degrade,

to an amazing extent,

but my first job was actually a sort of of a girl Friday,

in 1980 in Beijing,

and I know many of you were not around yet in those days,

but it was my first job,

as I say I was girl Friday for an American company,

that was the first to get a representative office

license in Beijing,

at the time,

I was about the age of,

I guess a fresh graduate from Claremont,

and I knew nothing,

I mean I knew something,

but I didn't really know much about the world,

one skill that I had,

was that I spoke relatively poor mandarin,

and this company,

I'm just going back to a time where I think it's

important for people to understand,

it was in 1980, an American company,

first company to get licensed to operate in Beijing,

second thing is the couldn't find anybody to go,

because there were not that many people from outside China

who spoke Mandarin and who were keen to go,

my Mandarin was passable,

because I had actually went back to school in Hong Kong,

I wrote myself to learn Mandarin,

I thought at the time,

that if I knew some Chinese,

some Mandarin,

that I could follow China's legal development,

because I was actually a law graduate,

and I thought as China was beginning to open up in 1979,

that if I could follow China's legal development that

that would be a good career for me,

so somehow I fell into this job,

because they were looking for somebody who

was willing to go to Beijing,

help them to physically open the office,

and be willing to work in Beijing,

now I put my hand up and I thought I want to do that,

because I can improve my Chinese,

and I was going to do something that none of my

contemporaries were doing,

I was going to go to China, I was going to go to Beijing,

so that's where I started,

and on my first morning there, I arrived at night,

I was staying in a hotel because they were no

appartments for me to stay in,

I didn't know where I was,

I didn't know where the hotel was,

the next morning I pulled open the curtains,

and the site was the Forbidden City,

and it was a clear, clear blue icy day,

it was 3 January 1980,

so from there,

I started to learn about China,

and in those early days,

this was China opening up,

China thinking about,

industrialization, how to catch up,

so I kind of feel I had a front seat just observing,

I worked for this American company that was a

commodities training company,

they traded physical commodities,

what that meant was if you were buying and selling steel,

you actually delivered thousands of tons of this,

so in those days,

I also had industrial insight into China,

because I was going to mines, I was going to factories,

they were producing these things,

the company that I work with we were sourcing raw materials,

China's development,

so I went to these unusual places,

definitely not tourist attractions,

but thinking back again,

I had this insight into what was happening in China,

now as we go along from 1980 into the 1990s,

we know kind of what happened,

China made a very major policy shift,

to reduce poverty,

this was its front and center policy,

what that meant was it had to have economic development,

it had to grow,

in order to advance,

to educate its people,

and to bring people out of abject poverty,

now, on the industrialization end,

we could see China becoming, a factory for the world,

even today, you remember how many things you're

buying for yourself,

for your families, that were made in China,

so what China had done in her model for industrialization,

was to be willing to do a lot of at

first lower end production,

so that it can produce all these things

that the West needed,

it fueled a kind of consumerism,

it had to import a lot of raw materials,

it had to use its own natural resources,

in order to get on this track of industrialization,

now we think about industrialization,

well we know also what happened in terms of

how it impacted on the environment,

if you went back to the mid-19th-century,

that was when the world started the industrial revolution,

and I'm sure for those of you who studied the environment,

you have seen the rise of carbon dioxide from the

time of the Industrial Revolution,

you can kind of see is the world

industrialized what that meant for

the environment,

the global environment,

if we were to take any particular country,

let's take the United States,

When did the US pass its first clean air act?

1970.

Now, that's not that long ago in the United States,

that's not that long ago.

A number of members of my family,

have been here in Los Angeles for a very long time,

and they talk about in the 70s growing up in LA,

the terrible smog,

and for people who are slightly older,

if you grew up in London,

they talk about the great smog of 1952,

That killed a lot of people,

in a matter of three or four days,

so it wasn't that long ago in the United States,

that there was the first clean air act,

in 1972 there was the United States clean water act,

and I remember in Hong Kong,

our clean air law,

also came about sometime in the 1970s,

after the US law,

so when the US puts forward its law,

I think other countries begin to see that

in their own countries,

that industrialization, rapid consumption, urbanization,

these things were beginning to have an

impact on our environment,

and you remember the 1960s,

that was the beginning of the rise of the

environmental movement,

then we fast forward, and we go to China,

and you can use this as a frame to

look at other countries that are industrializing,

so for example India,

we won't go to India today,

something we can look at in the future,

so China,

so 1980, China started her open door,

she started to industrialize,

she went into light industrial products,

making consumer products,

then of course to sustain that you need energy,

you need to build up power plants,

you need people to go to the cities,

or close to the cities to actually make these things,

so industrialization, urbanization,

it kind of came together,

and the first place China opened up

for foreigners,

people outside China to come and make things,

was across the border from Hong Kong,

the city where I grew up,

in Guangdong Province,

so just across the board from Hong Kong,

there is an area called the Po River Delta,

so it's a Delta,

so if you imagine Hong Kong in the Po River Delta,

this is an area the size of,

the size of the Bay Area,

San Francisco and the Bay Area,

so very small, it's not a big area,

physically very small,

but this was the first thumping heart of

China's industrialization,

the early part,

and then gradually China opened up more,

and people built up foreign businesses,

foreigners could invest in other parts of China,

so this is the context of the story,

now what I want to share with you,

is to discuss this tonight,

I'm not going to go into a whole a lot of

detail about the various serious

environmental problems in China,

I think you know that, it's really bad,

it was really bad, it still really bad,

but I do want to talk about where do we

think it's going to go,

what are the new ideas, are there any new ideas,

ecological civilization is being presented as

a new philosophy,

a new development model,

and I would like to go into that a little later,

so I am going to go into the 19th party Congress,

because I know this is a hot topic,

and we'll try to link those together,

and to use one subject as an example,

I want to talk about air quality,

so you can see are improvements being made,

and then finally,

are we helpful.

Now, this is an interesting map, it's a very famous map,

it was published in 2009 in the famous Journal,

and just use this, just use this as a kind of proxy,

to talk about where are the places in the

world that are more polluted,

so you can see,

you can see China,

the more red you have in this,

PM 2.5, so let's PM 2.5 as a proxy for pollution,

so you can say if we we're doing a similar map,

if we we're talking about water pollution,

soil pollution, other types of problems,

maybe this map is a kind of proxy for

many other environmental problems, today,

this was in 2009, and if we were to do it today,

it probably would be similar,

so just hold that thought.

Now the other thing about pollution is,

this was a statement that was finally made in 2013,

by the World Health Organization,

not only did they acknowledge that

air pollution is clearly bad for you,

but there are actually saying it's carcinogenic,

you kind of think didn't we know that already,

but it was only in 2013 that the number one

most credible world health body actually said,

actually said it,

and just think going back,

to this,

obviously places where air pollution is high,

people are going to be sicker,

and in China today,

the environment is a political issue,

because if we really dig into public health,

if you grow up,

if you have a young child, a baby,

if you grow up in a highly polluted environment,

it actually affects your developmental process,

so I can move the child, when the child is

10 years old let's say,

and, live in Claremont, sorry,

some of the impact is already done,

so it is really important to deal with pollution,

and we can say the same thing about water pollution,

that is why it is so important,

and you will remember going back a number of years,

in the last 10 years,

but there are photographs after photographs from the

international media about how bad air pollution is in China,

so actually there are a number of long-term consequences,

number one is, well you might be wheezing,

asthmatic, you might be having some problems today,

but even if you don't, it doesn't mean that

in the longer term you're unaffected,

because if you are a child growing up in

a highly polluted environment,

your development will have been impacted,

so as you grow up these things might catch up on you,

if you are an elderly person,

if you are a pregnant woman,

these are generally the kind of folks who

are more susceptible,

so you can see when you've got in China very,

very polluted environment.

And many of you know the story about the

American Embassy reporting on pollution,

that was only a few years ago,

at the time people talked about how China's

environmental data was either non-existent or unreliable,

I remember that time,

that was part of my time working on the environment,

so just something to bear in mind,

that we are talking about very serious problems.

The other thing I want to talk about,

is this level of pollution,

the sort of things that we're doing,

we need a lot of energy,

many of you are already concerned about climate change,

so climate change, pollution,

a few years ago a very important piece of research was done

by a number of scientists,

that talked about planetary boundaries,

has anybody heard of this term, planetary boundaries?

What it is is,

scientifically they looked at the planet and

said well what are the capacities of the planet,

to kind of digest waste,

so pollution, air pollution, water pollution, its waste,

these are forms of waste,

it's not just for example the food that we haven't finished,

that's a from of waste,

and I guess if you haven't thought about it

already it is quite scary,

everything that we do, including the really yucky things,

it never leaves planet Earth,

we can take all the unfinished food,

we can take all the things in your wastebasket tonight,

and we can put it in a bin and someone takes it

to a landfill, takes it far away,

but it actually never leaves planet Earth,

and the water that we use that we pollute,

it actually all comes back into planet Earth,

but what planet Earth is able to do,

is gradually clean it up,

so maybe it's a bit like our digestive system,

kind of gradually digests things,

but if you eat a lot,

you are constipated,

it overwhelms your systems,

so the idea of planetary boundaries is that

there are limits to our ecological capacity,

to the Earth's ecological capacity,

to deal with pollution and waste,

so this is very important to remember,

because if we were looking at,

our development, what we do, human activities,

with an eye to what the planet can take,

then we need to think quite differently,

I'll come back to this point in a moment,

so knowing that things are really bad,

what is China doing about this at the moment?

What the first thing to do is that you

have to acknowledge that we really have a problem,

and it took some time,

this concept, ecological civilization,

it's a term that first appeared in

Chinese political literature,

in 2007,

and for those who can read Chinese,

that is the four characters,

the first two, reading from left to right,

is ecological,

and the second two characters mean civilization,

now I think many of you have heard of the

term sustainable development,

sustainable development was a

flexible term developed in 1992,

after a very famous UN conference,

giving a message to the world,

so countries got together and the UN,

they proposed this term sustainable development,

to communicate that,

when we develop,

and the accept things are not going too well,

that there is unsustainability,

it means how can we develop in a way

that is economically profitable,

that is socially just,

and environmentally sustainable,

how can we do these three things,

and then over the course of time,

a lot of literature from all around the world,

had developed about how humans and

countries should develop in a sustainable manner,

what China has done is,

China also uses the concept of sustainable development,

but in 2007, it's come up with this new term,

so like sustainable development,

these terms are put forward,

not in a fully developed from,

so there is a lot of opportunity for definition,

for thinking about implementation,

how you're actually going to do it,

so China has now come up with its own term,

so just remember ecological civilization,

and if you were to go on the website,

and look at ecological civilization,

you will begin to see a little bit

more literature about what this means.

Now, this is a Chinese definition coming over time,

five years later,

you saw on television last night the

Chinese Communist Party,

nominating seven political,

politburo members,

so that's at the National party's congress,

so this is the Chinese Communist Party,

the party that rules China,

they have a party congress every five years,

so politically the party congresses in

China are very important,

and it happens every five years,

so you could say that sometimes it looks like a set piece,

but it's a set piece that is important in the

Chinese political world,

five years after they put out the

term ecological civilization,

they started to discuss what it means.

So we'll just read this together,

so they declared in 2012 they want ecological

civilization to be a strategy, to be a development strategy,

not just an environmental strategy,

so this is the strategy,

the Chinese policies should incorporate

ecological civilization,

into all aspects of economic, political,

cultural, and social progress,

so what they're doing is, they've now inserted,

ecology into achieving Economic, political,

cultural and social goals,

actions and activities relating to

China's geographical space,

that means where China is,

its industrial structure,

its modes of production,

and people's living should all be conducive to

preserving resources and protecting the environment,

so as to create a sound working and

living environment for the Chinese people and

make contributions to global ecological safety,

this is quite amazing,

so this is since 2012,

the strategy that the Communist Party and the government of

China has been thinking about how to actually achieve it,

and since 2012, and I was was working in Hong Kong,

working with the Chinese government on

issues that relate between Hong Kong and China,

I could see,

that these things were gradually being rolled out,

now it requires actually a lot of things to be done,

so you need good data,

do we have good data in China,

well increasingly so,

actually already a few years ago,

China started to report air pollution data online,

every city has to do that,

so getting the data out to people, very important,

the one thing I also had a personal experience on,

when I run my think tank and Civic exchange,

2001 and 2002,

we put together a research project on

environmental data between Hong Kong and our

neighbor in Guangdong, in the Po River Delta,

we we're studying so there was Hong Kong institutions,

there was Beijing, Chinese institutions,

as well as American institutions,

working together to collect the data,

to analyze the data, and to put out the data,

so this was one of those multi,

party collaborations.

In that time, we were working with, also the students,

on the mainland to collect mainland data,

where they were talking about how to use the project to

train young scholars and young experts on how to

collect data in a way where you know the

sample integrity is good,

because if you collect air quality samples,

if the samples are poorly collected,

you're not gonna get the right answer,

and in those days we had to send the

samples to the United States,

we sent them to Caltech, for verification,

so this was in the early part of the 2000s,

now today we don't necessarily need to do that,

today scholars, experts in China can do a pretty good job,

if you were back and let's say 2005,

and you said we need to train a lot of

people in China to do these things,

and we're just talking about sample integrity,

boy if you think forward,

and you say by 2015 we'll be able to do a

lot of this pretty well ourselves,

in 2005 you would say well that's 10 years away,

that seems so far away,

but actually these processes have been ongoing in China,

so today young people in China they have no

hesitation about going to universities,

going to engineering schools, studying environment,

energy, climate change, environment, biodiversity,

these are areas where there is a future,

there is a future because of these kinds of policies.

Okay, well in 2013 the other thing that was

significant in China,

and I was already in the Hong Kong government,

is that they declared war on pollution,

in the space of two years the proposed action plans.

And they demand that the whole of China had to act on them,

the war on air pollution for example,

nationally they declared 10 point plans,

and national 10 point plan to clean up pollution,

and then they demanded that each province and city,

you have got to have your own plan,

so the national plan is very broad on a macro basis,

but in your area, in your city,

you have got to have,

the government have to have their own plan,

so since 2013 there's been

tremendous improvement in air quality,

even though air pollution is still very high in China,

and I'll come back to this point,

and then after air pollution they had an

action plan for water pollution,

and then also the year after they had a

plan about soil pollution,

so they recognized that these three big

areas required very major reform in China,

okay now,

on the 19th party Congress, this is

just what happened in the last week,

and so those of us who are,

environmental policy wonks,

I was waiting to see how important

ecological civilization and the environment would be,

in the new,

party leadership that is coming forward,

well it's right up there,

the environment was mentioned in the

15th minute of the work report of the general secretary,

this is important, if you're watching Chinese politics,

how they say, what they say, when they say it,

the emphasis is consistent, it's all there,

so we know until 2007 they came up with the concept,

by 2012 the developed the concept a bit further,

in 2017 this is it,

and what does it mean when you talk about development,

it means that when China continues to work on her

plans for further development, industrial development,

economical development, urban planning,

and other areas, there are two goals they have to hit,

the first one is social equity,

the second one is environmental protection,

so we now have a framework,

to look at,

what China is going to do and judge them by

performance going forward,

what I now want to share with you,

is some maps, and I know this is kind of hard to look at,

but what have they done,

I always say there's a lot of rhetoric,

governments all around the world say we're

going to do this, that, and the other,

but it's important to call them on

whether they've done it or not,

I work on air quality,

with the University of Science and Technology,

we've been following,

how China has performed on air quality,

going back to 2002 on the top,

and this is the one in 2016,

as I said today,

air quality is still really bad in China,

but is it improving?

And by what magnitude is improving?

This can all be scientifically shown today.

And I do take these maps and I do share them,

and discuss them with my colleagues across the

border in China.

So in my area, in Hong Kong, in southern China,

if you are looking at the map of China I'm kind of here,

and if you look at this,

now, I know we're using different colors,

so I know it's blue, it doesn't mean it's blue sky,

it just means that we've gone from a

lot of very deep red throughout the country,

to something less bad, and by the time we get down here,

it's a bit better.

Even the bit better part in southern China,

if you're gonna go and live in China,

and if you want an area,

a big urban area where the air is less bad,

it's actually where we are in Hong Kong,

in the southern part of Guangdong,

actually you can trace the industrial history of

the Po River Delta,

and it's remarkable that in the last three years,

we've had tremendous improvement,

this doesn't come from just talk,

this comes from hard work,

and I know you hear from the newspaper sometimes

they've shut down factories,

well they have,

they're controlling vehicles, yes they have,

it's a combination of many many different

things are being done,

so I always say the data speaks for itself,

is the data good, because it's the data we're

also doing out of Hong Kong,

this is from satellites and other ways of

looking and checking on the data,

I'll just say one last thing,

in Chinese politics, at the top, the very top,

at the pinnacle,

if you don't declare something is very

very important to them it gets lost,

so it's really important for the top

leadership to say the environment is now critical,

and it is critical, we believe it is,

because it's a political problem, people are getting sick,

and when we talk about that child,

that child growing up in China may be more

sick than a child growing up here,

because the developmental capacity of that

child has already been compromised,

so the more polluted a place is,

the more it means that you have a

contingent liability of public health bill coming,

so it is vital to clean up wherever you are,

the last thing I want to say is

China's rhetoric political rhetoric today,

is about the Chinese dream,

the Chinese dream of rejuvenation, this is a language,

and what does that mean,

for the Chinese that means I'm going to be somebody again,

I've had a terrible time, I'm going to be somebody again,

but nobody would recognize you are somebody if

you can't clean your own house,

nobody is gonna think,

China is wise,

that you've really done it,

if your environment remains in terrible condition,

so this is why you also hear the

Chinese leader talking about beautiful China,

we've got to deal with poverty,

we've got to clean up our own house,

if we cannot do that,

we cannot say China has risen.

So I hope that's interesting to you,

and I'm open to questions thank you very much.

(applause)

- Thank you so much, we will now have time for questions,

if you have a question please raise your hand and

I will come and had you the mic.

- [Audience Member] Hi, thank you for your talk,

I was wondering what the Chinese response was to

On the American flip-flop to the Paris report is?

- To be honest I'm not sure I'm in a

position to give you a full reply,

from the point of view of China,

if we listen to our leadership, what they talk about,

they made a point in the 19th party Congress to

also say that China will abide by international agreements,

on climate change,

so I think what you're going to see is

that China will keep to the Paris agreement,

China has made some pledges,

of reduction targets and so on,

I think you'll see those filled,

they seem to take it very seriously,,

if they put out a target and a timeline,

that they are going to make it,

I think you can be quite sure of that,

because all of those figures are in

national plans and provincial plans and so on,

and China clearly sees that in areas like climate change,

energy, renewable energy and technology,

that it has a chance to make advances,

so I think in international relations it

clearly wants to use the environment and

climate to also be making a mark.

- [Audience Member] Hi, thank you for your talk,

I was just wondering how this change in

China's production habits is going to

change the structure of,

Chinese expansionism,

with one road--

- One belt, one road yes.

- [Audience Member] And then get as well as like picture of

hegemonic production of goods for America.

- Sorry?

- [Audience Member] Cheap labor and cheap goods,

how is that going to change?

- This is an interesting point,

I know a number of NGOs that work in the labor area,

and they said to me,

focusing on China,

the told me seven years ago,

that they felt Chinese policy was to

enable the Chinese worker

to earn more money over time,

and it was not a,

it was not a policy to keep pay low in China,

And I thought that was a good idea,

because if you continue to want to do

one kind of production,

and keep your labor costs down,

you're going to keep on making cheaper goods.

So what I see today is that the

Chinese worker has seen a gradual increase in pay,

secondly is I also see,

and this is where environmental protection comes in,

that they are demanding, for example in southern China,

were people make a lot of textiles and clothing,

this was a very big industry across the border,

from the late 1980s onwards,

today, yes people are still making clothes,

but the requirement of water quality and so on,

and other environment standards are much higher,

secondly is,

that the technology is really going into how do

you make the fabric,

for example we have a research organization in Hong Kong,

that is now patenting,

using coffee waste,

so when you go into Starbucks and get your coffee,

there's a lot of waste every day,

is to use that to make a fabric,

and the fabric, I had one of the samples in my office,

and I like to show people,

you don't need to wash,

it's also a self-cleaning fabric,

so it's nicely designed, it's pretty cool,

that's the sort of thing they want to go into.

- [Audience Member] Hi, thank you so much for your talk,

I was really interesting by the clip you

had at the end about,

China viewing it as other countries,

how can they view us as wise or respect us

if we can't clean up your own house,

and I was wondering whether you thought

China in particular more than other countries is

motivated by this search for validation or

competition with other countries,

and its environmental endeavors,

or whether they want to do it without considering

what other countries are viewing them as.

- In my discussion on for example climate change,

what I see is that first of all,

are we seeing the Chinese doing a lot of their own research,

what impact will climate change have on China,

the answer is yes,

China has done a lot of its own

original research to understand the problem,

secondly, they have said repeatedly on the

international stage,

they are doing this because China needs to do it,

because the impact that climate change is

having on China is enormous,

so there are two aspects to this,

the first aspect is that we have all got to mitigate,

we have all got to reduce carbon as soon as can,

so the second thing is that climate change is

already with us,

for example in Hong Kong in southern China,

We've done a lot of scientific research,

Looking at what are the impacts on the ground for us,

we know for example,

we have hurricanes, we call hurricanes typhoons,

So it's been very interesting for me this summer to

look at the Hurricanes that you have had in the

United States, to see that what we can learn,

and in fact I'm working with the Institute of

science technology to see how next year we

can put on a major conference,

where will be will invite representatives from the

United States to talk about the experience from this year,

and also representatives from South Asia,

because while the news around the world has

been about Harvey and Maria,

actually terrible things have also been

happening in India and Nepal and Bangladesh,

so the fact is certain types of problems are

hitting many different parts of the world,

if you are in the hurricane zone,

that's you and me, the United States and China,

are our cities and regions able to deal with them,

what is the kind of infrastructure and

planning reform we are all going to need,

how can we learn from each other,

otherwise we are going to have landslides,

we're going to floods,

we're going to have all kinds of horrible problems,

so we are interested to study for example Harvey,

what is it that a city in Texas will

have to do going forward,

what have we done, we have done quite a lot in Hong Kong,

we are in a typhoon zone, and we live in tall buildings,

we live in massive buildings,

I think you're from Hong Kong, you know,

typhoons, when we have a hurricane we're ready,

if we were not ready, the city just wouldn't work,

and being in government in the last five years,

I asked how have we dealt with flood control,

cos I could see we were not flooding in, and Hong Kong,

but we were flooding around the neighborhood,

well we invested in the last 20 years HK$26 billion,

divided by eight roughly,

we invested billions of dollars in one

city to deal with flood control,

so that's what other cities have to do,

and we haven't finished with what we needed to do yet,

so it's a massive massive exercise,

for many many parts of the world,

so China is concerned first of all because of itself,

nobody is going to do it for you,

you've got to do it for yourself,

and if you have something to share because you

have some real experience of something,

share it, share it with others.

- [Audience Member] Thank you for your talk,

my question is about this documentary that

came out a couple of years ago called Under the Dome,

so I believe it was a Chinese woman,

she made a documentary about pollution in China,

because she lost her infant daughter to a tumor,

that she claimed was caused by air pollution,

and I believe the documentary was

taken off-line several days after the release,

and correct me if I'm wrong it was due to

censorship by the government,

so I was wondering how these

documentaries and grassroots movements,

fit in with the government policies,

and whether or not that government action in

censoring this film contradicts their

ecological civilization political approach.

- That's a really good question,

we watched under the Dome in Hong Kong,

and we could see that within four days two

hundred million people in China had watched it,

and it really resonated, it really resonated with people,

also during that time,

they had to shutdown airports and trains,

because pollution was so bad,

now this was just a few years ago,

this was not a very long time ago,

and there was debate among some of us as to how that,

how Under the Dome was shown at all,

because if you happen to watch that go and watch it again,

you will see some very significant people she interviewed,

quite a number of them were people I knew personally,

these were very very well-known scholars and others,

in China

in air pollution, I mean you know all these people,

you can name, so and so,

so one of the takes is actually,

under the Dome couldn't have been shown at all,

if there was some kind of official condoning,

secondly, I don't know why they have to take it off,

maybe four days to hundred million people was

too much for them, I don't know,

but in any case, the point was made,

and following that in 2013,

I think it was in 2013 right,

and shortly after that in fact the 10

national air pollution measures were put out,

so I do see, under the Dome,

it really hit it at the right time for the general public,

but as I said,

we need to follow,

the government says all these things,

I'm going to do that and do that,

then you have to check from year to year,

have they done it, what have they done,

and how can we encourage them,

how can we encourage them to do more,

because the problem is still very severe.

Yes I think you had a question.

- [Audience Member] Thank you for the talk,

it is argued that some regional governments in

China are fabricating the data,

so if you take several pictures of the polluted area,

some people would say that the data may be inconsistent,

so I'm wondering how you would comment on the

data from the government,

how is that different from the data that you are provided?

- Faking of data was a serious problem,

when we look at historical data,

even in the Po River Delta,

there are some data that quite don't make sense,

but in any case what we wanted to know are we moving in the

right direction, and how can China put in place a system,

where first of all they do good measurements,

second of all is they have supervisors to make

sure that you're not faking the data,

and then thirdly you need the ability to analyze the data

to decide what you're going to do next,

so what you see is that in China over time

they are building up the core of regulators and enforcers,

and I can't quite remember what the numbers are,

In China today released data like how

many regulators they have,

and the fact that they are prosecuting people,

is their no faking at all,

I can't say that,

but as a whole will you trust Chinese data,

that pollution data we can trust,

we can trust,

and because technically things are more robust,

and people are actually much more competent,

the scientists are actually much more competent,

it's much harder to get away with it today,

and the other thing is your boss is looking at the data,

this is the thing that really scares people,

today if you are a senior party official,

or you're a senior government official,

your promotion is no longer tied to

just your economic targets,

you have to deliver on meeting your environmental targets,

so if you are somewhere in the system and

you're thinking of faking things,

so you can get it past your boss,

you know your boss is looking at the stuff online.

- [Audience Member] Hello, thank you for your talk,

so developmentally China has gotten to the

point where they started to export polluting manufacturing,

miseries of steel and paper to

other poorer developing nations,

also known as pollution havens,

so you've talked a lot about this

ecological civilization,

and I was wondering to what degree China has a

global responsibility,

of promoting this image while also,

carrying out actions that pollute countries abroad,

and how they are able to reconcile this politically?

- They have begun to,

acknowledge,

some global responsibility,

so we can go back to looking at how,

China is framing ecological civilization,

that it does include making contribution to the

global ecological safety

in its international relations,

in its development project overseas,

is ecological civilization fully integrated in yet,

I think not,

how this technological civilization,

as China goes out of China to invest in projects and so on,

I think this is something we're going to have to

wait and see,

and also potentially a very important area.

But this is also very important,

for people in China to continue to articulate that

there is global ecological responsibility,

So for example another major area for those of

you who were doing economics and finance,

a major discussion in china is green finance,

I don't know if you're aware until 2015,

as part of this last five years,

the People's Bank of China,

which is the central bank in China,

they came up with the very important influential document

on green finance,

it talked about China not,

what we call the brown to green transition,

China acknowledges,

and this is that the central bank level,

but China does not have enough money,

to do all the things that it needs to do,

to deal with the environment,

and it says explicitly,

and it thinks it has somewhere between 10 and

15% of the trillions of dollars that they are going to need,

just in the next five years,

so it said that it has to be able to

raise money from the private sector,

both in China and outside China,

to deal with this transformation,

and then it list out 14 things that it's got to do,

to transform financial services so that it can go

and raise money worldwide,

so this is again a new area,

one of the things in this 14 areas is,

it acknowledges that as China develops,

a China infrastructure bank,

which is the development bank,

and as it works on projects outside China,

that those projects should have some

kind of environmental screening,

now how it is going to do it going forward,

we have to wait and see,

but that's also very encouraging,

for those of you who are in finance and economics,

the People's Bank of China green finance White Paper,

is worth a look at.

- [Audience Member] Hello, hi, thank you very much,

as a person who just come from Beijing,

I lived there for 10 years of my life,

I want to raise some concerns about how

young people like me,

Young people like me are attitude towards the government,

especially aspects about how the equivalent of Facebook,

and Twitter,

in China we have Wechat,

recently a lot of sensitive articles,

are being reported,

and are being put down,

so a lot of people have been,

we have followed many experts,

we follow grassroots movements and their

articles are gone as soon as they put them on,

and also a lot of documents,

documentaries, videos,

we have no access to that,

let alone we have a great firewall to

access Google and YouTube,

I am very glad to hear that the government is

making an effort,

but as high school students and now college students,

I'm really concerned about how can China's government,

how can China's government meet the needs of people,

and be monitored by the people,

if we don't really have the freedom of speech,

and if young people are not engaged,

freely in this conversation?

- Well that's a very important question,

and I don't have a quick smart answer for you,

the reason is for us living in Hong Kong,

we are very conscious that if you're in Hong Kong,

which is a part of China,

you can access anything that you want,

and we understand that when you cross the

border that situation changes,

for those of us who are used to a free environment,

the context in China,

is not very attractive,

on a political end,

what Chinese leaders have to do to deal with those issues,

I don't claim to know what to do,

it's very easy to say they copy the Western environment,

and actually if you look at the 19th party Congress,

they spent a lot of time trying to discuss why

they can't go down that road,

but I think what you're talking about his,

is there some space where you can have

access to information and more freedom of expression,

I think this is probably one of the major

challenges for China going forward with its own people,

I think that's number one,

number two is, this is also one of the areas

where China's rise is going to be judged by the

international community.

As I said, I don't have any quick and

easy answers as to how to do that.

But I hope young people don't lose interest in politics,

whether you are here in the United States,

or whether in China or elsewhere,

in a way whatever political process you have,

you are relying on your political leaders to

do right by you,

and if people don't want to go into that process,

and going into that process could be very unattractive,

in different countries,

so one of the things that is difficult,

even in a city like Hong Kong,

you have no personal life,

and whatever you do, whatever you've done in the past,

and your families,

they are open for discussion,

by others.

So even just on that simple thing alone,

it put a lot of people off going to politics,

and I spent a long time whenever I've

talked to young people,

to say do not abandon the public sector,

because that's where we expect a lot of

things to be done in the public interest,

so when China it's hard maybe,

but how do we define this China,

you see in China, they talk about,

Interparty reform,

as you know some systems, some Asian systems

believe that reform is going to come from within,

you've got to build up the competence,

you got to clean up corruption within the system,

but outside you don't knock the system,

so that's one line of thinking,

and another line is we should be able to

say whatever we want,

we should organize and so one,

some different styles of thinking,

China and the US perhaps represent two

very different systems,

and I think when you're a student,

there are probably two of the best systems for

you to think about,

and think about systems,

what you think, and what you might want to do,

and wherever you are, whichever country

you may end up working in,

what is that public dimension of your

lives that you will offer for the public interest,

not everybody is going to be a politician,

not everybody's gonna be working in the public sector,

but as a citizen what is it we can do,

to improve the public interest,

I think that's really important going forward.

- [Audience Member] Hello, thank you for your work,

we all need the environment matter what country we're in,

I was interested when you spoke about the

government and how things like this,

and ecological civilization being promoted at a

government level trickles down,

could you speak a little bit more

about local level policies,

or specific events,

or any kind of efforts that have

happened at the grassroots level, by the community level,

that have been affected by the government?

- I think it's important,

Under the Dome, Under the Dome had a tremendous impact,

it was watched in four days by over 200 million people,

there are also NGOs in China,

that have been pushing for data transparency,

so even if you just take Chinese government data,

and they do release a lot of data,

and today you can put it online in China,

so this is a Chinese NGO,

taking Chinese government data,

from different cities, provinces, putting up it up there,

and you can organize today,

in a way that communicates what that means,

that's very powerful,

I think that was the start in China of releasing data,

online data,

and the Chinese government went along with it,

because it also recognized that even the

powerful Chinese Communist Party cannot do everything,

and if you want to move certain things forward,

you do need the people support.

The thing about the environment, nobody is going to

argue with you ideological that

pollution is a good thing,

no one is going to justify that,

so, on the environment I do personally think this

is a very good idea,

this is a very good area for

rigorous government to government talks,

US China,

if you want to choose an area to really have good dialogue,

well the environment is a pretty good one.

NGOs, environmental NGOs have had a bit more space,

that perhaps other kinds of NGOs,

when pushing for data transparency,

using research perhaps that has

been done at the universities

about public health so on,

these are areas of potential opportunity.

- [Audience Member] Thank you for your talk today,

I was raised in Shanghai,

I can say it's absolutely one of the most

heavily polluted cities in the world,

sometimes the air pollution is just so

bad that I couldn't go out without wearing a mask,

and my question is,

although we are aware that somehow nowadays the

leaders of Chinese political system,

are embracing this idea that we need to

protect the environment,

and we need to put this at a very important place,

but how long do you think it would take for

Chinese citizens to really embrace this

idea that environmental protection is now

pretty much of the same importance with

economic development,

and how long do you think they will really achieve this

national consensus that it's an important thing,

it's something that is trivial and not important?

- I think you've asked a very important

question of how people are,

because in Hong Kong, I'll share a story with you,

I was banging on the table when I was a

member of the legislature,

in the mid-1990s,

To say air pollution is really deteriorating,

and part of the reason is the

Po River Delta had become really industrialized,

and there's just a lot more air emissions,

so it's Hong Kong and the whole region was

much more polluted,

and it took people actually quite a

number of years to accept,

but the air pollution was getting worse,

I think in China today it is so bad in times,

there is no hesitation that it's really bad,

Now your question is,

when will Chinese citizens think the

environment is important enough,

but aren't they now today?

Now, you might be saying,

maybe different things may be air pollution,

we can all see it,

we'll stop airplanes and airports, et cetera,

that's clearly bad for economic and development,

but what about things you can't see,

so I'm just trying to ask,

do you think it's important to the Chinese citizens,

from the government's point of view its assessment is,

the environment is really bad and is a political issue,

it's not just an environmental issue,

it's become a political issue that you cannot hide from,

so do you think Chinese people don't care enough still?

- [Audience Member] People all see it,

because it's happening,

and it's influencing them a lot,

but my question was how long do you really

think they will really take on this lifestyle,

that's more like their really environmentally friendly and

they would care more about recycling,

to drive cars less often, and to use public transportation,

how long do you think before that kind of

lifestyle change with happen to the

majority of Chinese citizens?

- Well I actually don't know what the answer is of course,

we can stand here and have a completely depressing story,

welcome to the United States you say,

How many of you are recycling?

How many of you are consuming less?

How many of you are counting your carbon footprint?

I don't know,

the issue is I think is where that

transformation comes from,

now in the United States if we were

having a discussion about United States,

how do you think that change might be coming,

then you can switch to another country,

and ask how do we think that might come in China,

so you can think things are much worse in China,

so we have a bigger stake to do more,

and we have a government that is front and

center today telling us that we need to clean up,

otherwise China is going to be nobody,

okay, they're putting in systems, recycling and all that,

I don't know when you're going to back to

Shanghai next time,

I think over the course of the next few years,

you're going to see a lot more of that,

I can see what the government is trying to do,

even in little Hong Kong,

we're very upset in the government on our own

inability to do better on waste,

so were pilling money in,

persuading people that in the future you are

going to pay to throw away,

and we'll see if we get the legislation passed,

so there's a lot of challenges that we all have to do,

but in China at least,

China being a more authoritarian top-down political system,

if you haven't got the leaders telling you

we're going to do this,

and we are going to pound money and manpower into doing it,

it's not going to get done.

How long it will take the Chinese people to get into it,

I can't say at the moment.

- [Audience Member] Hi, thank you so much for coming out and

giving such a wonderful and informative talk,

my question is, as you mentioned,

wages increase in China becomes more environmentally aware,

and implements these costly policies,

do you think this will give rise to a

new environmentally polluted country,

that will often even cheaper labor,

and experiences fast industrial growth?

- You mean another country?

- [Audience Member] Yes, this pollution becomes essentially

displaced into a different area.

- Well,

that may be possible, and not privy to all

that the development plans of different countries,

one of the things that all of us worry

about is well,

let's just move off somewhere else,

we are beginning to see,

well we have been seeing manufacturing moving out of

China and going into other countries in south-east Asia,

yes we can see that,

well I think we do need a global discussion about

some of these things,

but we can at least say it's China's fault,

what we want to do is have a global

discussion about responsibility.

- [Audience Member] Hi, thank you for your talk,

you mentioned that social equity is

one of the most important

Pillars of China's environmental development policy,

I was wondering if China is

seeing similar social problems that the US sees,

which is lower income households being pushed into

more polluted areas,

or having jobs that are more exposed to pollution,

or if they have different problems in China,

and I was wondering what policies have been

implemented to deal with those problems.

- I'm not very knowledgeable about the

movement of people from one area to the next area,

and what are all the policies,

but the central policy for China has been to reduce poverty,

I think there is no argument that China has really done that

amazing job and lifting some hundred

million people out of poverty,

this was their policy in 1979,

this was their goal, and by and large they

think by 2002 they will have reached that goal,

and by 2035, actually it's quite good for

you to read the party congress timeline,

so they think they will continue,

they don't in a way foresee China developing in the

same pathway as high-energy, high consumption,

they say that for the Chinese,

what is the kind of lifestyle they think

the Chinese people might aspire to,

they call it a kind of middle-class status,

and they're comparing that with perhaps the

lifestyle in Hong Kong and in Singapore,

they're looking at those areas,

and saying we'll perhaps reach that kind of status,

and they think they can get there by about,

2020,

they think they'll get there in a few years,

but they haven't cleaned up the environment,

the environment is still bad,

so that's why that is one of the key focus,

and they talk about rebalancing development,

to rebalance development,

let me just emphasize this point,

if we look back,

I think it's very hard to criticize the

Chinese government for lifting hundreds of

millions of people out of abject poverty,

they have done that,

and are gonna clean up the environment,

so that's good going forward,

I don't know how many governments in the

world are actually having this as their driving policy,

my driving policy is to lift people out of poverty,

people say that,

but with China what you can do it you can now

look back 30 years,

and say well have you done it?

I think this is where they feel a lot of pride,

for all the faults that China has,

this is an area they feel very proud of.

And I think it's time for us actually,

including us in Hong Kong,

to ask how did they do it?

How did they actually do it,

when so many other places haven't done it?

- [Announcer] Unfortunately that is all the

time we have tonight,

please join me once again in

thinking Speaker Christine Loh.

(applause)

- Thank you, thank you,

thank you.

For more infomation >> Ecological Civilization: Is this the answer to fixing China's environment? - Christine Loh - Duration: 1:14:23.

-------------------------------------------

Even Liz Warren Is Turning on Hillary, Points Out Corruption. - Duration: 5:46.

Even Liz Warren Is Turning on Hillary, Points Out Corruption.

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren is considered by many to be the top candidate for the 2020

presidential nomination on the Democrat left.

She's also considered by many Native American tribes to be America's most powerful cultural

appropriator.

But I digress.

The point is, when Warren weighs in on the Democrat National Committee (and, more specifically,

the shenanigans described in an excerpt from former DNC chief Donna Brazile's new book,

which details how the committee more or less rigged the nomination for Hillary), people

within the party listen — especially Hillary Clinton.

And Hills isn't exactly going to like what Fauxcahontas had to say.

In an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper on Thursday, Warren said that she believed that

the 2016 Democrat presidential nomination was rigged and that new DNC head Tony Perez

would have to bring in Bernie Sanders voters "or he's going to fail."

Warren's remarks came after Tapper talked of Brazile's claims "that the Clinton

campaign in her view did rig the presidential nominating process by entering into an agreement

to control day-to-day operations at the DNC."

"This is a real problem, but what we've got to do as Democrats now is, we've got

to hold this party accountable," Warren said, adding that she told Perez when he was

elected chairman that "you have got to put together a Democratic party in which everybody

can have confidence that the party is working for Democrats, rather than Democrats are working

for the party."

"And he's being tested now.

This is a test for Tom Perez," Warren continued.

"And either he's going to succeed by bringing Bernie Sanders and Bernie Sanders' representatives

into this process and they're going to say, 'it's fair, it works, we all believe it,'

or he's going to fail.

And I very much hope he succeeds."

"Senator, do you believe with the notion that it was rigged?"

Tapper asked.

"Yes," Warren replied.

Astute political observers — or merely literate people who read the DNC emails in which the

collusion was plainly discussed — could have told you this more than a year ago.

I guess it took Sen. Warren a bit longer to catch on, which is understandable considering

she's spent 68 years upon this island earth and, as far as we can tell, still doesn't

grasp elementary economics.

However, that's all changed now that Brazile's piece on Clinton has been published.

(Short version, for those who haven't seen it: Brazile exposes how Clinton used the DNC

as a de facto arm of her campaign from the moment it started in order to beat Sanders,

ignored FEC laws, and siphoned off tons of money from state party apparatuses, thus hurting

the party's chances in down-ballot races).

It's worth noting that the Democrats have gone from throwing Clinton under the bus to

throwing her under the Acela and keeping watch by trackside to make sure the next train runs

her over, too.

Warren, it should be pointed out, has never been on board the Clinton caboose.

A 2004 clip that predates Lieawatha's days in the upper chamber shows her castigating

Hillary for flipping her support on a bankruptcy bill, purportedly due to corporate pressure.

However, even though Clinton aides privately feared Warren would endorse Sanders, the Massachusetts

senator dutifully campaigned for the pantsuited one, even rallying "nasty women" to the

cause at a New Hampshire rally in the closing days of the 2016 election process.

(Because boy, they couldn't get enough of that phrase, could they?)

Now, Warren is more or less admitting that Trump's verbally infelicitous "nasty woman"

remark — essentially meant to highlight the fact Secretary Clinton was a soulless,

corrupt politico — is materially true, in spite of the loaded connotations laid on it

by liberals.

Clinton used the party as a vehicle to ensure her own success and sucked it dry to feed

a campaign that still couldn't win.

And yet, people like Elizabeth Warren knew this.

Thanks to the WikiLeaks emails, it was more or less common knowledge.

If Warren believed that the process was rigged, she didn't need Donna Brazile to tell her.

We're not giving her points for pointing out corruption now when she should have known

nigh on a year ago.

What are your thoughts on Elizabeth Warren's statement?

Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe Top Stories Today.

For more infomation >> Even Liz Warren Is Turning on Hillary, Points Out Corruption. - Duration: 5:46.

-------------------------------------------

Why is The Pride of Britain such a special occasion? | Magic Radio - Duration: 3:58.

For more infomation >> Why is The Pride of Britain such a special occasion? | Magic Radio - Duration: 3:58.

-------------------------------------------

MUST WATCH : Even Liz Warren Is Turning on Hillary, Points Out Corruption | MK TODAY - Duration: 5:43.

Even Liz Warren Is Turning on Hillary, Points Out Corruption.

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren is considered by many to be the top candidate for the 2020

presidential nomination on the Democrat left.

She's also considered by many Native American tribes to be America's most powerful cultural

appropriator.

But I digress.

The point is, when Warren weighs in on the Democrat National Committee (and, more specifically,

the shenanigans described in an excerpt from former DNC chief Donna Brazile's new book,

which details how the committee more or less rigged the nomination for Hillary), people

within the party listen — especially Hillary Clinton.

And Hills isn't exactly going to like what Fauxcahontas had to say.

In an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper on Thursday, Warren said that she believed that

the 2016 Democrat presidential nomination was rigged and that new DNC head Tony Perez

would have to bring in Bernie Sanders voters "or he's going to fail."

Warren's remarks came after Tapper talked of Brazile's claims "that the Clinton

campaign in her view did rig the presidential nominating process by entering into an agreement

to control day-to-day operations at the DNC."

"This is a real problem, but what we've got to do as Democrats now is, we've got

to hold this party accountable," Warren said, adding that she told Perez when he was

elected chairman that "you have got to put together a Democratic party in which everybody

can have confidence that the party is working for Democrats, rather than Democrats are working

for the party."

"And he's being tested now.

This is a test for Tom Perez," Warren continued.

"And either he's going to succeed by bringing Bernie Sanders and Bernie Sanders' representatives

into this process and they're going to say, 'it's fair, it works, we all believe it,'

or he's going to fail.

And I very much hope he succeeds."

"Senator, do you believe with the notion that it was rigged?"

Tapper asked.

"Yes," Warren replied.

Astute political observers — or merely literate people who read the DNC emails in which the

collusion was plainly discussed — could have told you this more than a year ago.

I guess it took Sen. Warren a bit longer to catch on, which is understandable considering

she's spent 68 years upon this island earth and, as far as we can tell, still doesn't

grasp elementary economics.

However, that's all changed now that Brazile's piece on Clinton has been published.

(Short version, for those who haven't seen it: Brazile exposes how Clinton used the DNC

as a de facto arm of her campaign from the moment it started in order to beat Sanders,

ignored FEC laws, and siphoned off tons of money from state party apparatuses, thus hurting

the party's chances in down-ballot races).

It's worth noting that the Democrats have gone from throwing Clinton under the bus to

throwing her under the Acela and keeping watch by trackside to make sure the next train runs

her over, too.

Warren, it should be pointed out, has never been on board the Clinton caboose.

A 2004 clip that predates Lieawatha's days in the upper chamber shows her castigating

Hillary for flipping her support on a bankruptcy bill, purportedly due to corporate pressure.

However, even though Clinton aides privately feared Warren would endorse Sanders, the Massachusetts

senator dutifully campaigned for the pantsuited one, even rallying "nasty women" to the

cause at a New Hampshire rally in the closing days of the 2016 election process.

(Because boy, they couldn't get enough of that phrase, could they?)

Now, Warren is more or less admitting that Trump's verbally infelicitous "nasty woman"

remark — essentially meant to highlight the fact Secretary Clinton was a soulless,

corrupt politico — is materially true, in spite of the loaded connotations laid on it

by liberals.

Clinton used the party as a vehicle to ensure her own success and sucked it dry to feed

a campaign that still couldn't win.

And yet, people like Elizabeth Warren knew this.

Thanks to the WikiLeaks emails, it was more or less common knowledge.

If Warren believed that the process was rigged, she didn't need Donna Brazile to tell her.

We're not giving her points for pointing out corruption now when she should have known

nigh on a year ago.

What are your thoughts on Elizabeth Warren's statement?

Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe.

For more infomation >> MUST WATCH : Even Liz Warren Is Turning on Hillary, Points Out Corruption | MK TODAY - Duration: 5:43.

-------------------------------------------

God is Our Healer Pt 1.1 - Duration: 29:33.

For more infomation >> God is Our Healer Pt 1.1 - Duration: 29:33.

-------------------------------------------

Being An Ex-Con Is Mandatory For This Job - Duration: 2:01.

Part of what we're after,

say is look man,

I don't care how fucked up you are.

If you've got a prison record,

if you've been out on the streets,

thats almost a prerequisite

to come in to our program.

I mean, who does that?

From the mosh pit to the kitchen

This punk rocker went from protesting

our broken social system to trying to fix it.

We started a program called Empower LA,

which is a job training program

for young men and women

aging out of foster care,

older women home from prison.

LA Kitchen is a charitable organization.

Now it gets donated food.

The donated food is used

to train men and women

in the job training program,

who in turn manage and guide volunteers.

I just wanted to,

not only feed people a better meal,

but I wanted to lift people up

and show that they had a skill.

There's people out there

who need a role to play

to have a gift something to offer.

Anybody that has a criminal record

believes that they cannot be employed.

A lot of times you can't.

76 percent of former inmates say

that it is nearly impossible

to find work after being released.

But now we have programs

that help people like me.

I was on drugs.

Drugs lead to crime.

Crime leads to jail.

It was very difficult looking for work.

I tried and tried.

I came to the conclusion

that I was not hirable.

A great non-profit

doesn't try to fix the problem.

It reveals the power of community

to solve the problem,

working side by side.

Theresa's one of the first graduates

from the Empower Program.

And now i think about it,

she guides every volunteer

that comes through,

and virtually every student

So she's kind of like our North Star.

Me and my co-workers,

we're happy with what

we're doing for people.

We just had a student

that worked the Academy Awards.

I mean, it can't get better than that.

You know we feed people great meals.

We give people great jobs,

and we make money while we do it.

I mean. what's not to like?

LA Kitchen's always open.

You have a role here.

We want you here. Get on down.

For more infomation >> Being An Ex-Con Is Mandatory For This Job - Duration: 2:01.

-------------------------------------------

CÉLINE DION is extremely my shit - Duration: 5:24.

I always loved her.

In utero, I already was feeling her.

If you grew up in Quebec, she's like God.

♫ You're here There's nothing I fear ♫

♫ And I know that my – ♫

Céline Dion is a French Canadian superstar.

♫ Baby, baby, baby ♫

♫ When you touch me like this And when you hold me like that ♫

I cannot tell you a moment in my life that I remember not knowing about Céline Dion.

"It's all coming back to me–"

Wait, can we play one of the songs?

[Offscreen] "Sure."

It's working!

Oh my god, "Tell Him" is...

Her duet with Barbra Streisand I know by heart.

Me and my best friend would sing "Tell Him" every single day.

That was our favorite activity.

We did synchronized swimming together, and at every shower after every practice,

we would sing "Tell Him," and I was Céline's voice, and she was Barbra.

♫ If I tremble when I speak ♫

It's so good. And the video's so good.

They're in the studio, and you can see them reading the lines,

and they each have their earphones, and one's off, one's on, it's so cool.

♫ Tell him Tell him that the sun and moon— ♫

I guess I always knew her French songs.

♫ Ne me plaignez pas Ma vie est plutôt belle ♫

When I moved to the U.S., and I sort of felt like I was a little girl from Montreal

trying to make a name for herself and work in New York City, her music, actually, I really related to.

Pretty much at the end of every run that I took in New York,

I played this one song that Céline has called "Incognito."

♫ Incognito Bien dans ma peau ♫

"Incognito" is all about going to a place where no one knows your name

and sort of becoming your own.

♫ Incognito Bien dans ma peau ♫

"Incognito Je sais..."

"Je recommence ma vie à zero," right.

"I'm starting my life from zero."

Céline made it.

She never changed who she was.

She's still a weirdo.

There's this video called "Céline Dion is Fucking Amazing."

She just starts singing "Who Let the Dogs Out."

"Who let the dogs out?"

There's no context.

She's backstage, they're just rehearsing or something,

and everyone's just like, "Yeah! Whatever!"

"Who let Céline out?"

Her humor is still so Quebec.

"Oh won't you take me to..."

It's kind of like an absurd form of humor that is not really common, I think, in America.

It's remarkable for me to watch.

"You're done!"

There are a lot of people, in Quebec especially, who think that she's cheesy.

I do think that since her husband passed away,

I feel like people have really grown to appreciate her.

♫ ...all by myself anymore ♫

She's having a renaissance right now.

That's how it's described in Quebec newspaper.

♫ Bring me the big stuff Bring me the big one ♫

It's like she has this new presence and power and depth to her,

having overcome so much tragedy.

♫ On and on Does anybody know what we are living for? ♫

Basically, if you want to feel like love can conquer anything,

you should listen to Céline Dion.

♫ The show must go on! ♫

For more infomation >> CÉLINE DION is extremely my shit - Duration: 5:24.

-------------------------------------------

BOMBSHELL: Sessions Issues Horrifying Terror Warning, This Is Serious - Duration: 3:40.

Following the recent terrorist attack in New York, many are concerned additional attacks

may occur as other terrorists embedded in the United States are inspired to strike.

According to The Washington Examiner, Attorney General Jeff Session's revealed a startling

statistic that gives weight to this concern.

According to the Department of Justice, there are "hundreds" of ongoing investigations

into refugees who have entered this country suspected of terrorism-related activities.

The startling comment came days after Sayfullo Habibullaevic Saipov killed 8 people and injured

at least 12 with a rental truck when he intentionally drove onto a bike lane full of pedestrians,

according to CNN.

Saipov has publicly and repeatedly declared his allegiance to ISIS through his own words,

notes in his truck and ISIS propaganda on his phone.

It's also reported that ISIS has claimed Saipov is their "soldier of the caliphate"

in their al-Naba newspaper.

They stated that "One of the Islamic State soldiers in America attacked on Tuesday a

number of crusaders on a street in New York City."

This horrific act and the startling revelations of ISIS ties, unofficial or otherwise, has

led many to call for enhanced national security.

Sessions argues that these cries are entirely justified saying that the US is lacking both

manpower and resources to prevent these types of terrorist attacks due to President Trump's

travel ban being hindered by the left.

Sessions argues that most terrorist attacks carried out in the US are by those who have

immigrated to this country one way or another.

"The President is determined to keep terrorists and their sympathizers from infiltrating our

country.

And he knows that, since 9/11, most of those convicted in our courts for international

terrorism-related crimes have been foreign-born," he said.

He called for better vetting stateside, claiming that other countries have been unable or unwilling

to do proper vetting for those wishing to come to the US.

"The countries covered by this order have failed, or are unable, to provide us the information

necessary for proper vetting of their nationals," he said.

"How do you vet people from North Korea?

How do you vet people from Syria, where war and violence continues?"

This is not to say that all refugees or immigrants to the US are terrorists, far from it.

But given there are literally hundreds of investigations related to terrorism suspected

of refugees alone suggests there is a problem.

One of the best solutions to this problem and one that would save on manpower and resources

would be to properly vet these individuals before they can enter the US.

It's not racist, it's not bigoted, it's common sense.

The average American doesn't let just anyone enter their home without knowing who they

are or what their intentions are, regardless of their ethnicity or religion.

What President Trump and Attorney General Sessions are suggesting is that we take that

same logic and common sense and apply it to our own country.

It's also not saying that we should cut off all immigration and bar refugees from

entering this country.

If they pass the vetting process then they're more than welcome to enter.

If they fail the vetting process it means that something about who they are or what

their intentions are has raised red flags and it would be risky to permit them access.

It has nothing to do with race or religion, merely their allegiance or affiliations, like

Saipov siding with ISIS.

Stronger vetting and travel bans are obviously going to ruffle the feathers of well-intentioned

individuals abroad trying to enter the US, but given the very real threat of terrorist

attacks against US citizens the frustration and hurt feelings are worth it.

For more infomation >> BOMBSHELL: Sessions Issues Horrifying Terror Warning, This Is Serious - Duration: 3:40.

-------------------------------------------

Is Donald Trump really hiring the best people MSNBC - Duration: 4:28.

For more infomation >> Is Donald Trump really hiring the best people MSNBC - Duration: 4:28.

-------------------------------------------

Taylor Swift Is Selling a Reputation Merch Top Inspired by Her Fashion Mistake - Duration: 1:58.

Taylor Swift Is Selling a Reputation Merch Top Inspired by Her Fashion Mistake

Taylor Swift is ramping up her announcements in the week before her album release (shes already revealed two new songs release dates this morning, and its not even noon).

Sure, theres the music first, but theres also a New York City pop up store coming with special Reputation tour merch on November 12-16:.

Swift released her lookbook of the line, and Buzzfeed noticed that one top in particular seems to be inspired by a fashion mistake Swift made. In November 2014, Swift was photographed at a basketball game wearing her burgundy tunic backwards.

Fans gently called her out for it, and Swift commented on Tumblr. I think what theyre trying to say politely is.I wore the shirt wrong, didnt I, she wrote.

If youre ever having a bad day just remember that Taylor Swift wore a shirt backwards without realizing it. pic.twitter.com/2jyIXam4DM.

Taylor Swift Is Surprise Dropping Another Song Heres Taylor Swifts Original Ex-Boyfriend Lyric Taylor Swift to Perform on SNL.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét