Chủ Nhật, 26 tháng 11, 2017

Waching daily Nov 26 2017

Avengers Infinity War: Is time travel in Avengers 4 CONFIRMED by THIS new set photo?

  The Marvel extravaganza begins next year with Avengers Infinity War, seeing the superheroes team up with the Guardians of the Galaxy.

A cosmic threat in the form of Thanos is set to put the Avengers to the ultimate test as the villain sets out to gather the six Infinity stones and harness their power for his evil ends.

That's the premise anyway, while much mystery surrounds the second part, which doesn't even have a title yet because it's a spoiler. However Avengers 4 is currently filming in Atlanta, Georgia, where some big clues keep popping up in set photos.

The latest, reported by AJC, sees an avenue full of 1940s cars and apparently Chris Evans aka Captain America has been on set – this is his original era after all. There are two obvious options here.

One is that this is a flashback, or we're gonna see some time travel. The latter is seeming more and more likely following sightings on set of dead characters like Quiksilver, who met his end in Avengers: Age of Ultron.

Not to mention shots of Robert Downey Jr, Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston dressed in exactly the same attire they wore in 2012's Avengers Assemble.

Earlier this summer Mark Ruffalo accidentally teased that "everyone dies" which could be plausible if time travel were used to reverse it. But how? Well Benedict Cumberbatch's Doctor Strange is currently in possession of the Time Stone.

Will he use it to save his fellow Avengers?  Avengers Infinity War will be released in UK cinemas on April 27, 2018 and will be followed by Avengers 4 on April 2019.

For more infomation >> Avengers Infinity War: Is time travel in Avengers 4 CONFIRMED by THIS new set photo? - Duration: 2:25.

-------------------------------------------

ZHASK OR HELCURT ? Who Would You Choose? Who is Better? (Mobile Legends Experiment) - Duration: 11:54.

Hello Friends back again with Vincent here. This time I will make experiment

about zhask and helcurt, the new hero that has not Released on the normal server, for the zhask will be Released

on this Tuesday is 28nov17, for answer some of your Question, so

in this video i will create content about zhask vs helcurt and you can choose

which hero is worthy and must you buy so you do not regret for the future

so maybe with this video you can little can know about which one should be

bought so as not to regret later xD because it is not easy to find 32k BP

within 2 weeks, especially for players who are not very active, may have to be more selective.

EXPERIMENT 1: Same 2 Level 4 with the amount of gold and build items that are not too much different.

from here we can see the damage of hellcrust is very spicy, and also its passive male opponent silenced

very useful for self-defense because the enemy will silent 1.5sec every 3Seconds coolldown

here it looks I use a helcurt somewhat a little late to remove the ulti so it must be

killed first by that Zhask's ultimate, and ultimate helcurt is also immune to stun opponent.

This hellcrust is an assassin with a low movement speed according to me. because basic

movement speed is only 255 compared with another hero assassin having 260 MS.

so to use this hero must wear an emblem that has a movement speed

high and combined with shoe items or items with Movement speed.

WAR KE 2: With item and amount of gold not too significant + full skill test.

and it turns out the hellcrust is still outdone by zhask in the early game due to every mage for sure

can master the game even though the item is still not so completely. and here we can see

skill 2 of his hellcurt when max stack (5) demage which is very remarkable. because according to

I own only skill 2 of this zhask that can relied on to kill his opponent as well

with his 1st skill to harras his opponent as he can silent and slow his opponent.

For Ultimatenya itself is also very useful when there will be a war group, as it can

causing his opponent to lose sight for 3 seconds, not just the enemy in

near the helcurt that could be affected by its ultraviolet effect but all enemies can also be affected

Its ulti effect though it is out of reach helcurt in other words ulti area 1map, sadistic !!!

actually hellcurt is not a suitable hero for 1 on 1 because every hero of assassin is sure

has thin blood, as it does with This helcurt is also a kidnap hero like

his sister is natalia, hero assassin kidnapper is very scary for the pros with this hero.

one of the advantages of helcurt ulti besides make blind also increase the speed of hit and movementnya

within 3 seconds, yapz that ulti similar to the skill that is owned by roger who is also still countryman

with the helcurt with its sharp claws and ready to rip its prey cruelly and

and inhumane, so if you meet hero this is the ulti fast you are hiding, so as not to be clawed

WAR TO 3: With no gold comparisons too far and with some finished items

here helcurt can be slightly superior because of in terms of items and levels so that damage

generated already large. while the zhask itself is a hero early game where he is very

useful in terms of push tower and survive but if when the late game this hero will be

a little defeated if against the enemy already so item2 buildnya. so can we say that

zhask is a terrible hero when in early game with its very useful active skill2

to harass or to survive from attack his opponent. Zhask is indeed

hero is very OP on the first time he was released. thus making many players complain

and ask for it immediately in nerf (unloaded) his skill status, because the hero is deeply imba

facing his opponents, although he has to fight 1 vs 5 also still able to face

all the opponents very easily because this zhask has 3 active skills and 1 skill ult

which was terrible in his time, so on when I met the same zhask immediately run

terbirit2 like dikejar2 debt collector, can imagine not how horrible this hero.

WAR KE 4 : dengan perbedaan level yang tidak terlalu jauh berbeda dan dengan beberapa item.

yapz as has been said before zhask is a hero early game and will

helpless when it comes to late game because he will not be able to withstand damage

a very big one from his opponent, so he will more quickly killed before he can kill

his opponent, because zhask here does not have disable or stun skill that can be used for

escape from the pursuit of the enemy, he can only rely on the ultimate skill that has

damage is great and also if not wrong also can stun when 2 times shoot his enemy

so the 3rd shot will cause stun to the target in a few seconds, this is very useful for

defend yourself and turret while being attacked, and also for his 3rd skill that can

reduce the enemy's movement speed by 80% well this is useful when we pursued pursuit

which was terrible in his time, so on when I met the same zhask immediately run

But is the zhask now still overPower? The answer: yes if you know how or

his techniques when using this hero, but zhask which now is not the old zhask anymore

because it has received 2x nerf process on the server advance on patches 32 and 34, sadistic really ya up

2x in nerf, wah means mobile legends is doing a little mistake on this hero, but luckily

there is an advanced server like this, its function for test new heroes before in lyrical on ori server

WAR KE 5: Already Started Log in Late game with Items are almost finished

Can be seen here zhask can not avoid helcurt attacks even inside

For more infomation >> ZHASK OR HELCURT ? Who Would You Choose? Who is Better? (Mobile Legends Experiment) - Duration: 11:54.

-------------------------------------------

Big SUGAR IS Big Tobacco - Duration: 5:55.

Up next on SUGARbriety Is SUGAR the NEW tobacco?

no Big SUGAR IS Big Tobacco

A new study just came out of UCSF about how The Sugar Association killed their own research

projects implicating sugar in heart disease and cancer almost 50 years ago.

So what?

That's a LONG time ago.

That's EXACTLY the point.

SUGAR isn't the NEW tobacco.

Big SUGAR IS Big Tobacco.

Big SUGAR's been doing EXACTLY the same lying dastardly things as Big Tobacco for a very,

very long time.

It just took longer for us to find out.

Big SUGAR started buying up scientists to exonerate sugar and blame fat for what sugar

does way back in the 1940's when they started paying Ancel Keys to say it was FAT not sugar

that caused heart disease.

In the 1950's Big SUGAR executives boasted about their plan to steal market share away

from fat by claiming fat was unhealthy.

They STARTED with the negative health claim.

THEN they funded research designed to support the claim.

They didn't want facts, they wanted market share.

In the 1960's Big SUGAR paid off Fred Stare and the Harvard nutrition department and told

them to blame fat for heart disease and say sugar had nothing to do with it.

Harvard's Fred Stare had no problem lying for Big SUGAR.

After all, he was already on the payroll for Big Tobacco.

Which brings us to the latest UCSF study.

Going through old Sugar Association papers, researcher Cristin Kearns found that one of

Big SUGAR's studies found evidence of sugar causing cancer.

Big SUGAR's response?

They KILLED the study and didn't publish it.

Another Big SUGAR study found evidence implicating sugar in heart disease.

Big SUGAR's International Sugar Research Foundation (ISRF) didn't publish that one either.

Cristin Kearns says, "ISRF's research was DESIGNED to cast doubt on the importance

of elevated triglycerides in the blood as a heart disease risk factor.

It is now commonly accepted that triglycerides ARE a risk factor, but this was controversial

for decades."

Indeed, Cristin.

Big SUGAR helped CREATE that controversy by BURYING their own evidence against sugar.

Big SUGAR funded Super Secret Project 259 which showed differences in rats fed SUGAR

vs STARCH.

When early reports showed that the sugar fed rats had MORE cancer causing substances in

their blood, Big SUGAR KILLED the study only THREE months from completion.

Cristin Kearns says, "Our previous paper and this one demonstrate that ISRF's research

program was DESIGNED to SUPPORT its business interests at the EXPENSE of the public.

ISRF sponsored more than 300 research projects between 1943 and 1972, and its successor organisations

CONTINUE to fund research.

I think it's safe to say the problem is MORE widespread than what's outlined in

the paper."

I'd say so, Cristin.

Absolutely right.

Current CEO of The Sugar Association Courtney Gaine recently said, "Now, 50 years and

thousands of studies later, there's still no scientific evidence that sugar

causes heart disease."

Say what, Courtney?

You'd have to be living under a rock OR be working as the CEO of The Sugar Association

to think that.

As Kimber Stanhope and Peter Havel said in their 2010 paper, "Recent data suggests that

fructose consumption in humans results in increased visceral adiposity, lipid dysregulation,

and decreased insulin sensitivity, all of which have been associated with increased

risk for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes."

Didn't read that one, Courtney?

Kind of HARD to believe that someone like you with a PhD in NUTRITION is UTTERLY UNAWARE

of the MOUNTAIN of research implicating SUGAR in HEART disease.

Who should know more about nutrition.

An audio/video engineer like me or a dietitian with a PhD in Nutrition?

You would HOPE the nutritionist, right?

Well, we'll never know EXACTLY what The Sugar Association's CEO Courtney Gaine "KNOWS" about

nutrition because The Sugar Association pays her a LOT of money every year to keep US confused

about sugar.

The Sugar Association and Courtney Gaine have only ONE job.

They're there to convince you it's OK to eat sugar no matter HOW much the real science

shows that sugar is DANGEROUS and DESTRUCTIVE.

Courtney Gaine isn't using her PhD in Nutrition to tell you the TRUTH about sugar.

She's telling you carefully crafted lies and obfuscations that skate around the truth to

FOOL you into eating sugar without worrying too much.

You really SHOULD worry if you're still eating a lot of sugar.

Too much sugar makes you sick in MANY many ways that don't show up right away.

And Big SUGAR, just like Big Tobacco spent MILLIONS and millions of dollars for DECADES

and decades to hide those facts.

Is Big SUGAR the NEW tobacco?

No If anything, they're WORSE.

As always, I'm your sweet but not sugary host Ben Fury.

Please subscribe to SUGARbriety.

And also please donate to our nonprofit mission to help save the world from sugar addiction.

Because stopping sugar addiction is up to us.

Thank you and be well.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét