Thứ Bảy, 27 tháng 5, 2017

Waching daily May 28 2017

Trey Gowdy Is the Perfect Trump Stooge in House Russia Probe.

Representative Trey Gowdy, Republican of South Carolina, has a very important job: preserving

the presidency of a man whose campaign featured individuals who had contacts with likely agents

of a foreign adversary that intelligence officials say interfered in the 2016 presidential election.

That interference favored the election of Donald J. Trump—or, at the very least, was

designed to damage his opponent, Hillary Clinton.

Gowdy's job of late has been getting tougher, what with The Washington Post's revelation

on May 22 that Trump had called Dan Coats, director of national intelligence, and Michael

Rogers, director of the National Security Agency, "urging them to publicly deny the

existence of any evidence of collusion during the 2016 election," according to the Post.

Then there's the Senate subpoena of documents from former National Security Adviser Michael

Flynn, who served as a Trump campaign surrogate, regarding his contacts with agents of foreign

governments (including Russia).

On Tuesday, Flynn's attorneys informed the Senate Intelligence Committee that the former

Trump flunky was refusing to provide the subpoenaed documents to the committee, invoking the Fifth

Amendment protection against self-incrimination.

On that very same day, John Brennan, former director of the Central Intelligence Agency,

appeared before the House Intelligence Committee, saying, as quoted in The New York Times, that

he "had unresolved questions in my mind as to whether or not the Russians had been

successful in getting U.S. persons involved in the campaign or not to work on their behalf."

Gowdy, a member of the committee, couldn't wait to pounce—especially on that "unresolved"

piece of things.

Willfully refusing to accept the fact that the CIA does not conduct criminal investigations,

Gowdy tried to paint the former spy chief as a partisan player by demanding "evidence"

of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and Russia, and insisting that Brennan

reveal, in a public session, information that Brennan said was classified: the names of

the Trump associates whose contacts with Russian figures the CIA had chronicled.

A perfect stooge for the quisling from Queens who is now the commander in chief, one has

to admire how compatible Gowdy's disregard for classified information is with that of

Trump.

Here's a brief excerpt of Gowdy's badgering, taken from a CNN transcript:

BRENNAN: I saw information and intelligence that was worthy of investigation by the Bureau

to determine whether or not such cooperation or conclusion [sic] was taking place.

GOWDY: That doesn't help us a lot.

What was the nature of the information?

BRENNAN: As I said, Mr. Gowdy, I think this committee now has access to the type of information

that I'm alluding to here.

It's classified and I'm happy to talk about it in classified session.

GOWDY: And that would've been directly between the candidate and Russian state actors?

BRENNAN: That's not what I said.

I'm not going to talk about any individuals ...

(CROSSTALK) GOWDY: But—but that was—but that was my question, and—and—and you

answered it.

You didn't answer it that way.

BRENNAN: I—no, I responded to your query.

I'm not going to respond to particular elements of your question because I think it would

be inappropriate for me to do so here.

GOWDY: So the answer...

(CROSSTALK)

BRENNAN: So I can only repeat what I said, which is that I was aware of intelligence

and information about contacts between Russian officials and U.S. persons that raised concerns

in my mind about whether or not those individuals were cooperating with the Russians, either

in a witting or unwitting fashion, and it served as the basis for the FBI investigation

to determine whether such collusion—cooperation occurred.

Later in the hearing, Representative Tom Rooney, Republican of Florida, asked Brennan, "Can

you tell us whether or not, from the information that you've looked at, it looks like the

intelligence shows that Moscow was actually rooting for Donald Trump or were they rooting

against Hillary Clinton?"

"I think my assessment was [that] it was both," Brennan replied.

The same could be said for Trey Gowdy, who famously tried to tarnish the reputation of

Clinton with an "investigation" of the 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi,

Libya, which took place during her tenure as secretary of state.

Gowdy's tribunal is estimated to have cost taxpayers as much as $7 million, only to come

up empty of evidence that Clinton was either negligent or complicit in the attack by anti-government

terrorists.

The investigation was undertaken as Clinton was preparing for her presidential run.

There's an old saying attributed to W.C.

Fields: "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit."

That's why Gowdy is trying to make it look as though the former CIA director's refusal

to say he saw actual collusion—which is not his determination to make—amounts to

proof that none took place.

Oh, I know you're not baffled by Gowdy's cow-pies, but his show isn't intended for

you.

It's for Trump's electoral base, the frothing-at-the-mouth types who show up at his rallies.

To maintain their majority in the House of Representatives, the Republicans must prod

those people to the polls in the 2018 midterm elections.

Should that majority slip from their hands, it's likely only a matter of time before

articles of impeachment are drawn up by the Democrats.

And that's why he badgered Brennan: It's a wink to the base that implies Brennan is

some kind of partisan hack, for the simple reason that he was appointed to his post at

the top of the spy agency by the despised Barack Obama, the man Trump falsely claimed

had usurped the presidency.

In the ruthlessly gerrymandered districts of states run by Republicans, running against

the first African American president—even one no longer in office—is a pretty strategic

plan.

Even brilliant, perhaps.

Thank you listen! please subscribe to check news.

Please turn on subtitle if you can't hear voice clearly.

I'm Joey.

For more infomation >> Trey Gowdy Is the Perfect Trump Stooge in House Russia Probe - Duration: 6:10.

-------------------------------------------

Renault Clio Estate 1.2 TCE Collection met Tomtom Navigatie de Prijs is Rijklaar - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Renault Clio Estate 1.2 TCE Collection met Tomtom Navigatie de Prijs is Rijklaar - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

What is Caliphate? Dr. Israr Ahmed - English Subtitles - Duration: 2:45.

Once Mr. Conne (?) the political secretary of American Consulate here (in Pakistan)

came to me and said that you want Caliphate, so explain to me what do you mean by Caliphate?

I said to him although it is a long topic but I will just say that

take your American Constitution, add three things to it, only three, and it will become the best Caliphate of today.

It will become best Caliphate because I believe that American Constitution is perfect with regards to all other matters.

American Constitution is at the highest level of social and political revolution.

And the Presidential system they have is closest to the system of Caliphate.

It is not like (Pakistan) that the Head of the State and Head of the Government are (two) different persons and then they are conflicting

and where after the issue of article 58-2b would then arise.

But there is nothing like that (in US constitution).

There is only one authority (President). The oneness of all the authorities.

President is both the Head of the State and the Head of the Government.

So, I said (to him) add these three things to the Constitution. The first is that "sovereignty in this country belongs to the God".

Not to the People.

The Second is that "no legislation will be done at any level------

I said "level" because there is federal level, state level, and then county level etc.

---------at any level which is repugnant to the Book of God and tradition of his messenger.

The third is that the non-Muslims here will be protected minority.

They will not be the equal citizens of the state.

Because legislation will be done based on Quran and Sunnah but they don't accept Quran, Sunnah, and messengers so how can they (get to make laws or) be associated?

They will be protected minority. The state will take responsibility of their protection, life and wealth, and their honor.

They will have all other rights like do businesses, jobs, trades, and whatever they want.

(They will have the right to) worship whomever they want and build places of worship the way they want.

Their places of worship will be protected more than the Mosques.

But they will be protected minority.

They will pay taxes. What is Jizya?

It is compensation and who is Dhimmi?

(Dhimmi is the one) whose responsibility of safety we have taken. We are responsible for their safety.

So they will pay Jizya and Muslims will pay Zakah. That's all.

So he said to me that he got it now.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét