Here Is A List Of Every Single Time Obama Committed An Impeachable Offense That Dems
& Media Covered Up!
"Impeach!"
It's been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone
to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through
the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama's administration – but now that
President Trump is the man in the White House, it's back with a vengeance.
Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the "I" word, hoping to nail Trump for high
crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI
Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into
former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
Some members of Congress are getting in on the action.
They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas.
Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President
Trump.
House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey
memo and other documents.
Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information.
And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked "Watergate."
Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue.
More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump.
Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically
echoing the left's impeachment calls.
MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America's new Richard Nixon.
"Watergate.
We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions," says
MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block.
"Now, who knows where the questions will take us.
But I know this: I'm not going to stop asking them."
Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C.,
demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday.
The posters read: "If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering,
lies, corrupt taking of Americans' tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite
possibly federal crimes and treason.
Also, any wars will be on your soul.
… Resign now."
But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned "impeachment"
enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump.
Why?
At this time, there's no evidence Trump actually committed a crime.
"The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,"
Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill.
Turley explained:
For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump
into the scope of the United States criminal code.
However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup.
Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment
before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office.
Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus
of breathless "gotcha" announcements.
But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes.
Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying
conduct.
A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503.
The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo.
There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening
witnesses to influencing jurors.
None would fit this case.
That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the "due administration
of justice."
However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence "corruptly"
when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate.
The term "corruptly" is actually defined differently under the various obstruction
provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted "with the intent to secure
an unlawful benefit for oneself or another."
Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily
seeking an unlawful benefit for him.
. Obama's Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary's private email
server Obama IRS targets conservatives
Obama's DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama's false promises
Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate
Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl
Extortion 17 'Recess ' appointments – when Senate
was in session Appointment of 'czars' without Senate
approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law
Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya
NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties
Miriam Carey Birth certificate
Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million
Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress
Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama's U.S. citizen 'hit list'
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét