Well the story of Russian hacking of the election is so two months ago even MSNBC is barely
talking about these days of course we wouldn't know.
But for some reason Republican lawmakers are still investigating the matter the house intelligence
committee is holding a hearing on Thursday of this week on Russia's involvement in the
last election FBI director James Comey an NSA director admiral Michael Rogers will be
there the press will not be there meeting is classified the public not allowed in sources
about concentrate Gaddy of South Carolina will be at the hearing of course and he joins
us now the scary things like a month yes Sir thank you so it does seem in light of the
foreign policy developments of the past month or so where the United States has assumed
a hostile posture toward Russia. That most people can't decide if you know
how would trump be doing the bidding of Vladimir Putin when he and Putin are so at odds.
So why given that is this going forward. Bossing summer folks initially who thought
that that was the motive behind you have to accept as accurate that Donald Trump colluded
to coordinate with the Russians right and that they had a motive to help him so all
of those songs and had to be made before you can then say but with the second more belligerent
stance towards Russia therefore that must not be true.
I sort of ground zero of what happened at twenty sixteen weather is Russia or another
foreign actor did they try to interfere with our election what was our response in twenty
six states not not. To want to go twenty six saying what do we
know what we do about it the felonious dissemination of classified material to me is always relevant
whether some headlines or not is always important and the issue of one masking is important.
But it does seem like luck it in a world where there's only so much time and so many priorities
in a Congress where you know. Winning a wall past the bomber cares not been
repealed or replaced. Were there a lot of priorities of the president
ran on remain unfulfilled for the Republicans in the body to pursue is basically a fever
dream from CNN. Seems a little weird.
Well there are six of us three hours in three days right kind of been assigned to the task
force and we're all old house until so up we do have broad your secure but it does include
the border wallet done include healthcare done include tax reform we're just intelligence.
So weather's North Korea whether it's a human trafficking in South America it's what we're
supposed to do and providing oversight over the intelligence community is part of it so
Bob Intel committee as a robust jurisdiction but this is part of it no other committees
of Congress to my knowledge or holding hearings not on the house side pot and quite frankly
thought we have time on. Those of us that our own Intel we can't talk
about the rent we get a what North Korea we can talk about other things that rare investigating
all of this is so windows are exceptions where we can both do it and then ultimately answer
people's questions at the end. So this is what's missing from the only crime
that we're pretty certain occurred. In the U. S. with the leaking of Michael Flynn's.
Conversations with the Russian ambassador is that part of the investigation.
I would say the hacking of the DNC would also constitute a criminal act so odd and the FBI
would have jurisdiction over both of those. But I don't think Congress is well equipped
to investigate crime and talked and no we're not so the constitutional injury or things
that are of significant public interest there is a role for Congress to play were dreadful
investigating crime that we should not attempt to do so all which is why you don't hear me
alleging that people committed crimes there is a constitutional that'll stop your colleagues
I notice that it does in in that disappoints me because I just I think you all.
To. Wait until all of the other this is an and
then ask the jury to draw whatever conclusion you want but we only have one reputation and
it is so easy to accuse someone of a criminal act Bob and we do it unfortunately and modern
day culture a lot. It's just unfair to the individual but who
do I totally agree that are you confident that director co me is stable and trustworthy.
I and what have they pay rich and provocative history with director combing dating back
to twenty sixteen dom are preferred to talk to him privately than in public because in
fairness to him he can answer most of my questions in a public.
Way is that to stop him from making all kinds of provocative public statements in the not
explaining them. Of I have a home base rich and provocative.
History. With ham we've agreed on some ladders we've
not agreed on some matters whether I like it or not he's a foundational witness in fact
he touches all four charges yeah our investigation it may be the only witness the dos touch everything
from felonious dissemination all the way back to one of the bureau initiate their investigation
so he's foundational it's not fair to asking questions in public when I know we cannot
answer Libya and then from him war develop other witness leads and documents that we
need. I'd like to ask a few questions posed by don't
become and I wonder should I put the news got really which already ruled good will toward
you try arms and get great scenic they asserted that.
For more infomation >> He Is Found! - Duration: 0:26. 
For more infomation >> 7May17 AHOK CLEARED OF BLASPHEMY CHARGES - Duration: 1:40. 
For more infomation >> BREAKING Look Who Is Leaving The View Show… - News - Duration: 1:48. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét