Waching daily May 5 2017

Lubin is coming soon I greet you in the

love and the light of the Infinite

Creator this is a quick update a Youtube

voy con is still going on however there

is some progress recently Google

announced that it's introducing a new

tool to tackle extremist concept and

overhauling its policies in a move to

end this massive boycott of advertisers

now that's great news

although our content is not considered

extremist content Google's ad inventory

is still very low due to the reduction

of advertisers it would take some time

for advertisers to examine Google's new

tools and start buying again because of

that we are still in need of your

financial support if you haven't made a

donation yet please consider doing it on

behalf of event is coming soon its

sister channels and affiliate channels

we'd like to thank all of you who have

shown your appreciation with your

generous donation we're asking everyone

to maintain a positive attitude and send

positive energy as you listen to and

view our video and now here is your

scheduled video victory of the light

physicists just came up with a viable

model for a time machine core spirit

physicists have come up with what they

claim is a mathematical model of a

theoretical time machine a box that can

move backwards and forwards through time

and space the trick they say is to use

the curvature of space-time in the

universe to bend time into a circle for

hypothetical passengers sitting in the

box and that circle allows them to skip

into the future in the past people think

of time travel as something as fiction

and we tend to think it's not possible

because we don't actually do it says

theoretical physicist and mathematician

bent a bit from the University of

British Columbia in Canada but

mathematically it is possible together

with David sang an astrophysicist at the

University of Maryland tip it has used

Einstein's theory of general relativity

to come up with a mathematical model of

what they're calling a traversable a

causal retrograde domain in space-time

yep the acronym is literally TARDIS but

before we get into the madness of legit

time travel let's put this into

perspective real quick

the researchers aren't claiming to have

a blueprint for a doctor whose style

time machine that can be built tomorrow

they say the materials we need to build

this thing are so exotic

we haven't even discovered them yet but

we will get to that in a minute fiercely

let's talk about what to put in saying

are actually proposing the model is

based on the idea that instead of

looking at the universe in three spatial

dimensions with the fourth dimension

time separated we should be imagining

those four dimensions simultaneously

that allows us to consider the

possibility of a space-time continuum

where different directions in space and

time are all connected within the curved

fabric of the universe Einstein's theory

of relativity links gravitational

effects in the universe to a curvature

of space-time the phenomenon thought to

be behind the elliptical orbits of

planets

and stars if space-time were flat or unn

curved planets would move in straight

lines but according to relativity the

geometry of space-time becomes curved in

the vicinity of high mass objects which

causes planets to bend their paths and

rotate around their star instead what if

it int sang argues that it's not just

physical space that can be bent and

twisted in the universe time itself can

also be curved in the vicinity of high

mass objects the time direction of the

space-time surface also shows curvature

there is evidence showing the closer to

a black hole we get time moves slower

says tippet my model of a time machine

uses the curved space-time to bend time

into a circle for the passengers not in

a straight line that circle takes us

back in time in order to harness this

theoretical property the physicists

propose creating a kind of bubble of

space-time geometry which carries

whatever's inside it through space and

time along a large circular path if this

bubble can hit speeds greater than the

speed of light

something the pair say is mathematically

possible this would allow it to move

backwards in time it is a box which

travels forwards and then backwards in

time along a circular path through

space-time the researchers explained in

their paper delighted external observers

would be able to watch The Time

Traveller's within the box evolving

backwards in time on breaking eggs and

separating cream from their coffee you

can see the basic idea in the image

below with a passenger inside the bubble

Time Machine personai and an external

observer standing beside it person B the

arrow of time which under normal

circumstances in our universe at least

always points forward making the past

become the present within the bubble but

we'll see the B's events periodically

evolve and then reverse outside the

bubble observer B will see two versions

of a emerge from the same location

once clock hands will turn clockwise the

other counterclockwise in other words

the external observer would see two

versions of the objects inside the time

machine

on version revolving forwards in time

the other backwards while tippet and

saying say the Maxis sound the problem

now is we don't actually have the right

materials to build what they're

proposing while is it mathematically

feasible it is not yet possible to build

a space time machine because we need

materials which we call exotic matter to

bend space-time in these impossible ways

but they have yet to be discovered

says tippet their idea recalled another

theoretical time machine the Alcubierre

drive which would also use a shell of

exotic matter to transport passengers

through time and space hypothetically

both ideas can't go very far without

some idea of how to actually produce

these space-time bending materials but

as tippet points out we're never going

to stop wondering about the

possibilities of time travel and this is

just one more direction we can take this

mind-bending physics studying space-time

is both fascinating and problematic

he says experts in my field have been

exploring the possibility of

mathematical time machine since 1949 and

my research presents a new method for

doing it the research has been published

in classical and quantum gravity

please like us and share with your

social media please subscribe and click

the bell to be notified of our new

videos remember to check out our

playlist for important Intel you may

have missed be sure to enter our

subscriber appreciation $100 monthly

giveaway the link is in our description

and visit our sister channel event is

coming soon for additional Intel and

information stay tuned

victory of the light

For more infomation >> PHYSICISTS JUST CAME UP WITH A VIABLE MODEL FOR A TIME MACHINE - Duration: 7:55.

-------------------------------------------

The Flat Earth Conspiracy - Debunked - Duration: 12:13.

As a YouTuber who debunks arguments, I'm forever receiving requests to take on certain

subjects, and most of the time they're related to religion (thank you by the way), but recently

a great many of you have asked me to take on the Flat Earth movement – and I can only

assume that this is because you couldn't get enough of Cosmic Skeptic's excellent

video on the subject, because before Alex very kindly gave me a shout out (by the way,

thank you again Alex) I had never received a single request to take on this subject – but

now I'm inundated with them!

But then again, perhaps the flat earth movement has just become a hottest topic under the

sun… or firmament?

In either case, I've decided to oblige, and so this is the Flat Earth Conspiracy – Debunked.

For those of you unaware, the Flat Earth Conspiracy asserts that the earth is flat, and that consequently

all of the evidence for a global earth is either invalid or part of a grand conspiracy;

this includes all photos that depict the curvature of the globe, GPS devices; the trajectory

of the sun, moon, planets and stars; moon phases; lunar eclipses; and time zones.

But it doesn't just stop there – by implicit extension, proponents also denounce Einstein's

Theory of General Relativity, most of Physics and Astrophysics, and on occasion even Evolution

by Natural Selection!

It really is the motherload of conspiracies, because it insists that all scientists, from

all countries, and that all governments have, and are, perpetuating this enormous conspiracy

in order to either somehow profit financially, or, I kid you not, to make the average citizen

reject the Abrahamic god.

Now needless to say, there are thousands of "proofs" offered by Flat Earth proponents,

and to address them all would take a significant amount of time and would bore even the most

intrigued Flat Earth enthusiast, and so what I've decided to do is to address what I

believe is the root of the conspiracy, and at the same time cover a few of the most prominent

arguments.

This root is, in my opinion, one unfortunate fact, and two particular fallacies.

The unfortunate fact is that our educational system has failed us; or as Neil deGrasse

Tyson puts it, "This is a deep failure of our educational system [...] There's something

deeper going on in our society that somehow enables people to believe they're making

cogent arguments when they're not.

You know what I think it is – the way we teach science is, you're just some empty

vessel and we pour this science into you and then you regurgitate it on an exam – where

as science is a way of thinking; it's a way of understanding and probing the operations

of nature."

And the two particular fallacies are as follows: the first is the Common Sense Fallacy, which

occurs when someone appeals to first-hand sensory experience (normally being eyesight)

as if it's infallible.

And the second is the Personal Incredulity Fallacy, which occurs when someone is either

unaware of how something works, or finds something difficult to understand, and therefore asserts

that it can't be true.

For example, the Flat Earth Society states that, "The evidence for a flat earth is

derived from many different facets of science and philosophy.

The simplest is by relying on ones own senses to discern the true nature of the world around

us.

The world looks flat, the bottoms of clouds are flat, the movement of the sun; these are

all examples of your senses telling you that we do not live on a spherical heliocentric

world."

Now to be fair, many of these assertions are true – our senses do in general tell us

that the earth is flat, but here's this thing – they also tell us that this image

is moving, but it's not; they tell us that these two red lines are different sizes, but

they're not; and they tell us that these lines are bent, but, again, they're not.

The point being here is that arguments that appeal to our perception and senses, such

as the assertion that the "Earth Looks Flat", that "Clouds Look Flat" and that "Stars

Don't Move", all commit the Common Sense Fallacy, because they act as if our senses

can't be mistaken, when, as we've just proven, they clearly can; our senses can be

fooled, and therefore they are not reliable.

This is something that should be very clearly demonstrated in schools…

Moving on, and to highlight an example where both the Common Sense Fallacy and the Personal

Incredulity Fallacy are particularly potent, let's take on perhaps the most common flat

earth argument – the assertion that the horizon is flat.

Whether we're looking at the horizon from the ground, a high mountain, or even from

a plane, it appears to be completely flat – there is no curvature.

Now the problem with this argument is that proponents of the flat earth model, and indeed

many proponents of the spherical earth model, seem to think that we should be able to see

a horizontal curve, when we really shouldn't; the earth is just too big, we are too small,

and our perspective won't allow us to see a horizontal curve unless we are extremely

high up.

And indeed, if we go to extreme heights, we can clearly see a curved horizon.

Countless space enterprises, and even unbiased citizens using a camera tied to balloon, have

captured breathtaking non-fish-eye photos and videos of this curvature – but Flat

Earth proponents simply assert that they're all part of the conspiracy – including inquisitive

children!

Luckily however, we don't need these photos and videos to prove that the earth is curved

– just as those before the advent of these technologies didn't either.

For example, one way in which you can personally see the vertical curvature of the earth is

to view an object that's beyond the horizon, such as this island, from one height and then

again from another height.

As you can see, the only factor changing here is the height – the equipment and the zoom

are exactly the same, meaning that either the earth curves, or that the water is also

part of the conspiracy.

Hence, the argument that the horizon is curved, like most flat earth arguments, commits a

Common Sense Fallacy and a Personal Incredulity Fallacy.

It commits a Common Sense Fallacy because it asserts that because you can't see a

curve in the horizon with your own eyes, it's therefore flat.

And it commits a Personal Incredulity Fallacy because proponents are either unaware of how

to witness the earth's curvature, or they don't understand how to, and they therefore

assert that there isn't one.

Another prominent Flat Earth argument that embodies the Common Sense and Personal Incredulity

Fallacy is the assertion that crepuscular rays (otherwise known as sunbeams) prove that

the sun isn't ninety-three million miles away, but rather, it's just above the clouds.

The argument is simple – as this photo shows, and as you've likely seen countless times

before, sunbeams clearly appear to converge at a point just above the clouds, and therefore

the sun is just above the clouds.

Now this argument commits a Common Sense Fallacy because it asserts that seeing a convergence

point just above the clouds proves, without a doubt, that the sun is indeed just above

the clouds.

And it commits a Personal Incredulity Fallacy because the proponents are either unaware

or don't understand basic atmospheric optics, and they therefore denounce them entirely…

which brings us back to the problem with our education system.

With these fallacies clearly pointed out, let's explain what's really going on here…

in short, and as Alex very clearly explained in his video, it's a matter of perspective.

If we look down a straight railway, such as this one, our perspective converges at a single

point on the horizon, and if we were to trust our eyes alone we would conclude that the

railway starts at this singularity, just as many conclude that the sun is just above the

clouds.

However, the reason we don't conclude that the railway starts at this vanishing point,

is simply because we've experienced two-dimensional horizontal perspectives our whole life, and

we've evolved to unconsciously know that our vision is mistaken…

But on the other hand, we've rarely experienced three-dimensional perspectives that don't

converge on the horizon, and we haven't evolved to recognize them when we do, and

hence, this is why sunbeams can fool us into thinking that the sun is just above the clouds.

What's more, and what just has to be said, is that this argument is just intellectually

lazy… if the sun was truly just above the clouds you could simply drive a couple of

miles towards the convergence point and be directly beneath the sun, meaning that you

could have one Flat Earth proponent viewing the sunbeams from one point, and another Flat

Earth proponent beneath the first proponent's convergence point, and when the second proponents

says that the sun isn't above him, they can both start arguing over which of them

is part of the conspiracy…

Now we could go on here indefinitely, slowly but surely debunking every Flat Earth argument,

but to reiterate what I stating earlier, this wouldn't defeat the Flat Earth Conspiracy,

because the problem (the crux) isn't these arguments – it's the education system…

we need to teach people how to think and why they ought to value science, rather than what

to think and how to regurgitate science… if we do this, the Flat Earth Conspiracy,

like many conspiracies, will indeed collapse, but until then, they aren't going anywhere!

So, to recap, the vast majority of Flat Earth arguments either commit a Common Sense Fallacy,

a Personal Incredulity Fallacy, both, and in some cases, if I'm honest, laziness…

if someone is truly serious about this conspiracy, they owe it to themselves to buy a decent

pair of binoculars and to go to the seaside and find an object that is beyond the horizon

(that is to say not on or near the horizon – it has to be beyond the horizon), and

then view that object by standing on a chair and then immediately afterwards by crouching

on the ground… but most proponents won't do this, and that, in my opinion, is very

telling…

And finally, I want to address a potential elephant in the room… you might be wondering,

why on this spherical earth have I taken on this conspiracy?

Well, the answer is an exact echo of Cosmic Skeptic's sentiments; likewise to most conspiracies,

absent healthy opposition, Flat Earth arguments can be quite persuasive, "and so credulous

people might be prone to the danger of adopting these beliefs because there's no serious

opposition to them, and if we just laugh these things of, and say 'well it's ridiculous',

let's not waste our time on them, then people who are beginning to become seduced by flat

earth conspiracies for instance, […] might just fall all the way down the rabbit hole."

Anyhow, as always, thank you kindly for the view, and I'll leave with this amateur rocket

capturing the curvature of the earth at 121,000 ft.!

For more infomation >> The Flat Earth Conspiracy - Debunked - Duration: 12:13.

-------------------------------------------

Watch awkward moment Jenna Coleman is quizzed about Prince Harry romance rumours. - Duration: 2:17.

Watch awkward moment Jenna Coleman is quizzed about Prince Harry romance rumours.

ACTRESS Jenna Coleman was put on the spot about her relationship with Prince Harry during

an interview on Good Morning Britain today.

The 30-year-old looked very unimpressed when she was quizzed by Kate Garraway about THOSE

pictures of her looking cosy with the royal.

After discussing Jenna�s new role as Queen Victoria, a giggly Kate asked the actress:

�Talking about passion, there have been pictures of you and Prince Harry.�

Clearly wondering where the line of questioning was going, Jenna started to look very uncomfortable.

Kate continued: �I'm assuming you were together for research, for the Royal Family?�

Keith Lemon Remaining professional Jenna responded: �No,

he is a friend of mine.�

Despite the Doctor Who star�s frosty reaction Kate continued to discuss how much she would

like to see the red-headed royal married off.

The comments didn�t go down well with Jenna, who clearly wanted to put an end to the interview

and thanked Kate and her co-host Ben for their time.

Those watching at home also noticed the awkward exchange, with one person commenting: �Kate

Garraway certainly peed off Jenna Coleman with that comment!

GMB.�

Another joked: �My new fav b**ch face: Jenna Coleman being asked about her relationship

with Prince Harry on GMB.�

Last year the stunning brunette was spotted enjoying a �flirty and tactile� exchange

with Prince Harry at a polo match.

Images showed Harry with his hand of Jenna�s knee, and the actress � whose ex boyfriend

is Game of Thrones star Richard Madden � was just as touchy feely back.

At the time a source said: �It was a very flirty, very tactile encounter.

She was leaning in to him and he had his hand on her knee.

From their body language, it looked like they were really enjoying each other�s company.

�They were sitting very close, laughing lots and touching each other.�

Jenna is currently promoting Victoria in which she plays Harry�s great-great-great-great

grandmother.

thank for watching.

please subscribe my channel.

For more infomation >> Watch awkward moment Jenna Coleman is quizzed about Prince Harry romance rumours. - Duration: 2:17.

-------------------------------------------

12 Ways to Get Rid of a Bloated Belly Without Abs Exercises - Duration: 2:25.

12 Ways to Get Rid of a Bloated Belly Without Abs Exercises

A protruding belly is one of the manifestations of bloating, which in itself is a natural

process of the body.

In a normal state, about 1 liter (about half) of the stomach and intestine is filled with

gas.

The air in the stomach is the result of the work of intestinal microflora microorganisms

� bacteria which help the digestive process.

The harder it is for the stomach to digest food, the more gases are produced.

Method #1: Massaging this point helps to reduce gas formation and relieve the stomach.

Take the navel as a "starting point."

Place 4 fingers horizontally above it.

The desired point is above the upper finger.

Massage it for 2-3 minutes clockwise and the same counterclockwise.

If you did everything right, you�ll feel a sour taste in your mouth and salivation

will increase.

Method #2: This massage will help to eliminate water retention and relieve stomach pain.

This point is situated at the height of the second finger above the navel.

Press on it, and massage for 2-3 minutes clockwise and as much counterclockwise.

Method #3: This type of massage will increase intestinal activity and remove heaviness.

Place 4 fingers horizontally under the navel.

The correct point is located under the little finger.

It also needs 2-3 minutes of massage clockwise and as much counterclockwise.

If done correctly, it�ll help to get rid of bloating.

A healthy person can have lots of causes of bloating.

They�re related to nutrition and the work of the stomach.

Here are a few basic tips: Drink a glass of warm water with lemon every

morning.

Don�t drink milk and coffee for breakfast.

Don�t wash food down.

Don�t drink alcohol on an empty stomach.

Drink ginger tea.

Don�t eat too much fatty food.

Don�t "eat air."

Don�t eat too many foods rich in fiber.

Relax, sleep well, and meditate.

For more infomation >> 12 Ways to Get Rid of a Bloated Belly Without Abs Exercises - Duration: 2:25.

-------------------------------------------

The Prophet's Son - Trailer - Duration: 1:38.

(concert music)

- [Narrator] He had a successful career,

a supportive family,

and life-long friends,

- Thank you.

- Juliet, this is Abel.

- but from the moment they met,

he knew his life would not be complete

without her.

♪ All I ever longed for was you

(scary music)

- Put the money in the bag

and no one gets up.

No one leaves.

- Just calm down, okay?

(gun click)

- Everything's gonna be fine.

Nobody here wants to hurt you.

Just give me the gun.

Please.

- Stop.

(gunshot)

- [Narrator] Strong Foundation Films presents

(upbeat rock music)

- I came as soon as I heard.

- [Narrator] a story about the moments that test us,

- God, please don't take him away from me.

- [Narrator] the bonds that unite us,

- How could this happen?

- [Narrator] and the commitment to faith

that helps us overcome.

- [Man] Do not let your hearts be troubled.

Trust in God.

- [Narrator] Josiah Warren

(upbeat rock music)

The Prophet's Son

(slow music)

For more infomation >> The Prophet's Son - Trailer - Duration: 1:38.

-------------------------------------------

Is the Hyperloop Safe from Terrorists? - Duration: 2:54.

This is the speed of a car, and this...is tube travel.

Today's question: Would tube travel really be safe?

Some people claim that it would be the safest form of transportation because it's immune

to weather and human error.

Others see it as a target for terrorism.

One of the most concerning dangers...is tube implosion

Yeah we can put people in there.

Ok, so tube implosion is a big problem,

but thickening the walls of the tube...can prevent it.

Tubes have a threshold called the critical pressure

This pressure must be well above atmospheric to prevent vacuum implosion.

Pc increases with the cube of wall thickness, so doubling the wall thickness will multiply

the critical pressure by 8.

Elon Musk proposed a steel wall thickness of just under an inch.

It turns out this thickness would be enough to prevent implosion.

Next, I want to consider a full pressure breach.

Let's say a terrorist manages to destroy a section of the tube so that the remaining

sections are open to the atmosphere.

A shock wave would rush through the tube followed by a supersonic air flow.

Luckily, the air expands so quickly that its pressure and density become low.

So what happens when this wave of air hits the first pod?

Not exactly.

The external pressure that the pod experiences is still low compared to the pressure inside

the pod, which is atmospheric, so structurally the pod would be fine.

The real concern is the acceleration that the drag force causes.

The pods need to slow down quickly enough to prevent a collision, but not enough to

harm the passengers inside.

Using reasonable dimensions, the drag force comes in at about 30,000 lb.

This force would help the pods slow down.

The exact deceleration depends on the pod's mass.

A small pod with 6 people would decelerate with about 5 G's, whereas a large pod with

30 people would decelerate with about 1 G.

If the pods needed to decelerate at a higher or lower rate, the propulsion system could

make up the difference.

So in conclusion, it looks like safety won't be a deal breaker.

Thanks for watching, and I hope to see you next time on Tube Travel.

For more infomation >> Is the Hyperloop Safe from Terrorists? - Duration: 2:54.

-------------------------------------------

Better is here, New Zealand_30 - Duration: 0:31.

Ian's only five minutes into his

90-minute lotus blossom chakra release massage

Pressure ok?

Yes, thank you.

Why don't we ask for better?

Like broadband.

You can have better and it's right under your feet.

What? There?

Uhh, forward a bit….

Some of the best broadband in the world.

Find out how much better yours could be.

Visit askforbetter.co.nz