Analysis of The Truth About Corey Goode By Bill Ryan -- Don't Let the Fear of Disinformation
Divide Us!
by Justin Deschamps
The following is an "outing" of the Secret Space Program insider and whistleblower Corey
Goode. It was produced by Bill Ryan, of Project Avalon, one of the forums Goode initially
was using to release information, prior to going public in 2015. I have a lot of respect
for Ryan, and Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot, as they have played a large role in my awakening.
But I think there is a serious problem within the truth movement that this issue is highlighting.
This article is not pro-Goode or pro-Ryan. However, as it stands, it seems the dialog
needs some clarification, and we hope to offer that here.
Update: Apparently a lot of people feel I am coming out against Corey Goode, this is
not the case. This article is my attempt to objectively analyze the claims of Ryan, and
present them in a somewhat unbiased way, for your consideration. Please read the article
completely before making your conclusions.
Firstly, for clarity, despite the fact Stillness in the Storm has featured a great deal of
Goode's testimony over the years, we do not claim the information to be unquestionably
authentic.
Goode's overall rhetoric to seek the truth, discern, get healthy, and be a better person
is a message we agree with, thus we are allies in that regard. His work is a series of unproven
claims, but these claims have much indirect support to confirm them, and are highly thought-provoking,
serving in consciousness expansion for that reason. The fact that the claims are unproven
doesn't mean they are untrue, but their incredible scope makes it difficult to believe. And all
the more easy to dismiss.
Secondly, those who are comfortable with uncertainty will have no problem contemplating Goode's
material with an open unbiased mind, discerning objectively what they find. But to those who
need definitive answers, the temptation to blindly believe or reject information is always
great. And to make matters worse, there are scores of people who tend to reject any information
that doesn't fit their worldview or belief system, a form of emotional discernment.
What this does is shift a discussion away from seeking for the truth, analyzing claims
by themselves, and move it to a discussion about the person's character and past. Instead
of listening to the message, we can be tempted to focus on the messenger�who they are as
a person, what they like or don't like, what crimes they have committed, who are they associated
with, and so on. And while this can make people feel good or bad about the messenger, and
by proxy the information, it doesn't in the least confirm or deny the veracity of what
is claimed�it doesn't help determine if it is true or not. This is a strawman tactic
to pull people's focus away from the issues at hand and on to the person sharing the data�one
of the methods the powers that be use all the time.
Before long, a claim of truth isn't judged on its merits alone�on what it actually
says and if this matches reality�instead it is "discerned" by focusing on who is saying
it.
Unfortunately, because of time constraints, people in general simply don't have the ability
to dig deeply into a topic so they can make an honest assessment. This creates a perfect
storm�people who want to know the truth, who want an answer, but can't devote the time
or energy to seek for it properly�making them very easy to persuade with smear campaigns
and unfounded claims.
To add another layer of complexity to an already complex situation, there are very real disinformation
agents out there who most definitely are muddying the waters.
Related 7 Insane US Government Conspiracies That Actually Happened
But here's a little secret: all information is just a vehicle for ideas, and can be discerned
at a personal level to see if it is true or not. Whether an idea came from an outright
disinformation agent, like the mainstream media, or from the mouth of Jesus himself,
you can analyze it and draw a conclusion.
So in the end, since information, regardless of the source, can be evaluated for its truthfulness,
is it really worth it to go on disinformation agent witch hunts? Especially, if the end
result is division of the truth movement?
Obviously, denying the fact that someone could be an agent isn't advisable, but rejecting
a whole body of information based purely on a suspicion isn't a good idea either. And,
as anyone who has studied counterintelligence knows, the best way to combat disinformation
is by studying it, which can reveal clues as to what the players behind it are trying
to do.
So either way you look at it, avoiding reality, whether from a disinformation agent or not,
isn't productive.
Disinformation witch hunts are a big thing in the truth movement and the cost is unimaginable.
In my view, the whole truth movement is divided into camps that believe their version of truth
is right and everyone else is wrong. Almost no one is taking a holistic perspective to
consider all the information and discuss it openly with everyone. Considering we're all
reaching for the same goal�the truth�this seems decidedly unproductive and it pits people
against each other. In the end, everyone loses because the Cabal's NWO agenda moves forward
at pace, while we bicker about who is right or wrong.
Speaking as someone who is a somewhat public figure, I can tell you that I am constantly
receiving messages and emails from people who are very concerned that this or that person
might be a disinformation agent�to the point of making them clearly upset and out of balance.
Obviously, this won't make understanding the truth any easier.
Paranoia is communicable, and it spreads like wildfire on the internet. But given what was
just described, we need not take such a reactionary stance.
If you discovered that you might have been deceived, the last thing you want to do is
become emotionally reactive and fearful, shutting down your neo-cortex and rational mind�the
things we need to discern properly. When this happens, it is because our sense of reality
is being threatened, our belief system, but it requires that we face the situation with
a cool head; that way we can properly understand the information we're absorbing.
I'll share that in my years of being a truth seeker, I've seen my fair share of disinformation
scares. I have even been called a "disinfo agent" several times, with usually the haziest
arguments to back up the accusations.
At the end of the day, whether or not my chosen sources of information were disinformation
agents or not didn't really matter�I was still empowered with my own mind to discern
and make sense of the world, and that's just what I did. In those cases where a person
did appear to be a disinformation agent, interestingly enough, I still made good use of the data
to help expand my consciousness.
Frankly, I've learned a lot from so-called disinformation agents and a lot of them were
on mainstream television. That doesn't mean I believe them blindly, quite the contrary.
But as I said, all information is merely a vehicle for ideas, what we do with these ideas
is far more important than where they came from. And it's not discernment to blindly
reject or accept something without thinking about it.
So don't let the disinformation fear-mongers get you down�trust me, there's plenty of
them out there.
But to be clear, I don't think Bill Ryan has an insidious agenda. It seems like he's trying
to do what he feels is right, and I respect him for that.
But I will say this: no matter how bad things get, no matter how deceived we might feel,
it is never a valid excuse to stop working with each other in the pursuit of truth and
ending the madness in this world.
We are each unique perspectives on all that is, and as such, no one has all the answers.
Everyone is seeking the truth, whether they realize it or not. And those who are self-identified
truthers are even more empowered because they can consciously make the choice to work with
others. Whether we like someone or not, or even agree with them, should not stop us from
gaining wisdom through discussion.
Reviewing the Claims
Here's a list of what Ryan is claiming against Goode:
Kerry Cassidy doesn't think Corey Goode is authentic.
Goode sent some messages to Ryan that Goode later denied sending. Ryan believes when Goode
sent the messages, he was in a "split-minded state." (i.e. under mind control). Apparently
the messages were on Goode's computer, and the person he sent them to, which Ryan discovered
later. Ilie Pandia, an alleged IT specialist, reviewed
Goode's messages and claimed that Goode is not actually an IT professional, as Goode
claims. Ryan and others view this as a point of proof that Goode is a liar.
During the interview with Christine in Sept-Oct 2014, Goode said he was unemployed. Ryan claims
that later, Goode said he lost his six figure income job after being outed by Cassidy and
himself. Ryan claims this false statement by Goode is proof that he is lying about his
past employment. Goode was allegedly using the Project Avalon
forum as a "catchment area" for former MILABs, counseling them without the permission of
the moderators. This was viewed by Ryan et al as a grave infraction, although it is not
clear if Goode agreed not to talk to MILABs on the forum, thus deceiving the moderators.
Goode's wife Stacy joined the forum and made a post that claimed Bill Ryan was once a member
of the Church of Scientology. Ryan claims that the person she found in her research
was not actually Ryan, a different Bill Ryan, and edited her posts accordingly, but did
not notify her of the changes. Ryan claims Stacy and Goode reacted aggressively, saying
that Ryan had censored her on the forum. This appeared to make the situation even more tenuous.
Ryan claims that in Stacy's subsequent posts, she revealed that Goode was working with "higher
authorities" and was asked to produce a dossier on Ryan by a senior member of the church.
Ryan implies this is further evidence of Goode working for shadowy groups.
Ryan claims Goode was given FBI database access during this time, which Goode apparently disclosed
to Ryan in a skype message, also viewed by Ryan as an indication Goode is an agent.
After the drama on the forum, Stacy's account was "unsubscribed" and Goode left soon after
on his own accord. Goode then started a blog and posted several items that attempted to
smear Avalon, according to Ryan. Goode then began to speak with David Wilcock,
and seemed to have a more "polished" version of the story than Goode had previously given
to Christine, which Ryan and Cassidy thought indicated duplicity.
An alleged intelligence agent contacted Ryan to inform him that he had recorded Goode and
Stacy speaking in their home by activating the webcam on a computer near by, using well-known
methods available to government agents. In the recording, Goode and Stacy are allegedly
discussing how they plan to deceive David Wilcock. Ryan claims that Goode was desperate
for money, was looking for stardom and that apparently the intelligence community was
"letting this all happen" because it fit their agenda, all according to Ryan's unnamed source
in the intelligence community. The same intelligence contact sent a screenshot
from a phone of a skype conversation between himself and Goode to Ryan, wherein Goode says
"you are now on the payroll... so am I.. it is what it is." Ryan asserts that this is
proof Goode is an agent. Ryan claims the substance of Goode's testimony
and story is a "carbon copy" of other insiders, like Michael Relfe. Furthermore, he also feels
some of Goode's claims are just too wild to believe, e.g. that there are thousands of
undetectable planet-sized spheres in the solar system.
Ryan also feels that if Goode was authentic, he would never be allowed to talk. He further
claims that Goode is likely a false whisleblower, only allowed to talk because he was given
false memories and experiences that serve the agenda, much like what Dr. Steven Greer
claimed in November 2016. Ryan claims that if Goode was authentic, he
should have been silenced by now, like other whistleblowers. The fact that he wasn't, in
Ryan's mind, is proof that Goode is an agent. Ryan claims that even if some of the information
Goode brings forth is true, the whole data set is "is almost valueless for research purposes."
[However, this is not valid because information is inherently valuable, but said value is
dependent upon the person who analyzes it.] Ryan claims, although some disinformation
agents genuinely believe their own testimony, he thinks Goode is a conscious deceiver.
There is a lot to sort through here.
Analyzing the Claims
Firstly, there are two kinds of evidence to consider, one deals with events or incidents
that may or may not be true, and can be verified to some extent, and the other is personal
opinion.
In the first category, Ryan claimed that Goode sent messages and later denied them. He claims
that Goode is not actually an IT professional, which a colleague of Ryan's gave an endorsement
of after reviewing Goode's chat logs. Ryan claims that Goode was not fired from his job
as a result of being outed by them in 2014-2015. Ryan claims footage of Goode and his wife
concocting a plan to deceive Wilcock was captured, but not supplied for review here. Finally,
there is a screenshot from a skype message that appears to be an admission by Goode that
he is "on the pay roll."
All of these points can be confirmed or refuted with evidence, should it surface. However,
there is not evidence available to confirm any of this, save the photo, which we'll discuss
in a moment. And since no footage of the conversation between Goode and Stacy to deceive Wilcock
has been supplied, it is an unsubstantiated claim made by Ryan.
Thus, any conclusions drawn from these claims are speculations upon the assumption that
the above listed items are true. In other words, there is not enough evidence presented
by Ryan to objectively and materially confirm the claim that Goode is a disinformation agent.
This doesn't mean the claims are untrue, just that they haven't been verified with material
evidence.
At this stage, the only hard evidence for us to work with is the screenshot of the skype
conversation supplied by Ryan.
On this score, the skype image's authenticity has not been confirmed (seen below).
It could be a forgery, or it could be real.
Assuming it is real, the content of the message is not clear enough to make any definitive
conclusions. It could simply be proof of what Goode has already claimed, that he was working
for the government at one time, and would therefore "be on the pay roll." Or it could
be evidence he is being paid by some clandestine agency. And some have asserted (see the comments
section) that the chat log itself was doctored, evidenced by the edit symbol at the top left
of the field, in Goode's message.
The other points listed above are incidents that call Goode's character into question
or references of incredulity on Ryan's part�as a matter of fact, the bulk of his argument
is a series of statements about how authentic whistleblowers can't come forward and are
silenced, and therefore, "I, Ryan, can't believe Corey Goode." And the items that draw Goode's
character into question, as we discussed earlier, have no bearing on whether his claims are
accurate or not. If Goode claimed he was taken aboard a Solar Warden spacecraft, the fact
that he lied about his IT job wouldn't change anything.
In conclusion, there are points raised by Ryan that are worthy of investigation. And
if Goode, or others, can address these claims with specificity and evidence, it would help
clear the air for all involved. But even if everything claimed by Ryan were true, it would
only, at best, draw Goode's testimony into question, which frankly, people should be
doing anyway. No one's character, story, or claim is so good that it should be believed
without question.
For what it's worth, when I personally met Corey last year at the Mount Shasta SSP Conference,
I got the impression he was in his character authentic. In my personal exchanges with him
I did not detect any duplicity or feel he was trying to deceive me. Not that this has
any impact on whether his claims are true or not.
In the final analysis, there is no clear evidence presented here that Goode is a disinformation
agent, although, as I said, there is reason to suspect him of being one, as there always
has been. One reason being that there simply isn't any evidence to confirm his story. But
the case for Goode being a disinformation agent has never been strong, so this is just
a healthy dose of doubt.
And in general, almost anyone can, and should be, suspected of being a disinformation agent,
because we've all shared inaccuracies at one time or another. But more specifically, if
Goode is one such agent, it would still be valuable to research his testimony, for the
reasons of counterintelligence listed above.
With all due respect to Ryan, he appears to be resting his conclusions on hazy unproven
evidence, and mostly on the ideological belief that "authentic whisleblowers are usually
quickly silenced." But incredulity isn't enough to disprove something. Hundreds of years ago,
people thought it was incredulous or unbelievable that the earth orbited the sun�this didn't
change reality one iota because the truth isn't democratic.
So for those of you reading these words, trying to make sense of the situation, it is my conclusion
that there is no valid basis, as of yet, to support the claim that Goode is a false whistleblower.
If such information becomes available, then, and only then, can an honest and verifiable
conclusion be made. All else is just speculation, which can still be very beneficial if done
in an honest way.
Until then, we must navigate the seas of uncertainty, keeping an open mind so as to not blind ourselves
to greater truths.
Smear Campaign?
In preparing this post, I reached out to someone working closely with Corey Goode, who said
that there is a coordinated smear campaign taking place at the moment targeting whistleblowers
that feature similar content as Goode. And Goode himself stated this would happen last
year on his website.
Within one week, three different "independent" sources came forward claiming that Corey Goode
was a disinformation agent, Bill Ryan (in the posting here), C.W. Chanter, the YouTuber,
and Randy Maugans. Whether or not these individuals coordinated behind the scenes is unclear.
And the prominent ufologist, Dr. Steven Greer, also held the Cosmic False Flag presentation
last year, wherein he specifically named Corey Goode and William Tompkins as mind-controlled
disinformation agents. You can read my analysis of that talk below.
Related Uniting The People For Full Disclosure | Steven Greer's Cosmic False Flag Presentation:
Review, Commentary, Analysis and Assessment of Claims Against Goode and Tompkins
As much as I would like to say that it's silly that we have to deal with disinformation witch
hunts, it really isn't.
The fact is, the truth movement is a mess, running in a million different directions,
with various camps and groups all competing at various levels to be king of the truth
hill. But as I've mentioned, it's a foolish effort.
No one has all the answers, everyone has a piece of the truth puzzle, and we're all striving
to find the truth. Why let disagreements about something we can't even confirm divide us?
No one really knows whether or not Goode is authentic or not, not even he knows, so why
stop working with each other to seek the truth?
I implore you, whoever you are, to not let the program of divide and conquer pull you
down. We're all in this together, and the more of us that act like it, the better we'll
all be.
P.S. A special thanks to those who decided to share their truth even though it was controversial.
What we as a community decide to do�if we let our selves be divided�is up to us.
- Justin
The Truth about Corey Goode
Here's some information. It's far from complete, but it presents a sample of some of the problems.
(By the way, the last time I conferred with Kerry Cassidy about this, she told me that
she fully shares the view that Corey is compromised and is an unreliable witness. Or else, of
course, she'd have interviewed him by now.)
Corey first came to our attention as a problem before Christine Anderson�s 2014 interview
with him was published. He�d been active behind the scenes (by invitation) in investigating
the Jesse Ames affair.
He sent some messages in the middle of the night, that he denied any knowledge of. Our
very strong (unproven) suspicion was that he had indeed sent them, but had done so in
an altered or split-minded state, and in the morning had no memory of what he�d done,
though everything was there on his own computer and that of another person.
Ilie Pandia (who, like Paul, knows a LOT of technical, geeky stuff about computers and
the net) then looked closely at some of his statements, and raised a flag that there was
absolutely NO WAY he was an 'IT expert� as he had claimed. That simply wasn�t true.
This was the first time we�d realized there was a definite, proven, problem, and that
Corey had been lying about his expertise. (Claims about expertise can of course only
be refuted by someone who really is an expert.)
Christine�s Sept-Oct 2014 interview with Corey was largely unplanned: she had a dictaphone
in her pocket when she went to visit him at his home, and took the opportunity to record
their sporadic conversation (with his full permission, on two separate days). Christine
had been intrigued by Corey for a while, and had previously recommended him to be an Avalon
Moderator (an idea which the other mods had all rejected).
The recorded audio took a great deal of editing, to make the published version a lot more coherent
than the original really was. There were many long pauses, hesitations, ramblings, and stumblings.
Corey stated that he was on quite heavy pain medication, was on disability, had problems
with his memory, and had not been working for quite a while. (He lied about this later,
publicly claiming that he�d been earning a �six figure income�. This was a flat-out
falsehood.) I have all the original raw audio archived.
All this time, he�d been continuing to make valid and interesting contributions to the
forum. It seemed as if he might know something, somehow, but by the time we reached December
2014 it was clear that he was damaged or compromised in some way.
Further problems appeared that same month, when it became known that Corey was �counseling�
over 30 Milabs (military abductees), despite being quite unqualified to do anything of
the sort. The forum has a duty of protection, as Milabs are real people with often real
and very serious problems, that need the most expert help.
We didn�t know who all these people were, as Corey was doing this behind the scenes
using the forum as a kind of catchment area. We received a report from one person (a current
forum member) who�d been shocked, appalled and angered that Corey had totally (and sensationally)
misrepresented her story to myself. That�s all documented, also.
His wife Stacy then joined the forum, with username SilverPhoenix. All her posts can
be searched for. For reasons unknown, she made an incorrect statement in a forum post
that I�d been a member of the Church of Scientology: she cited the wrong �Bill Ryan�
in her �research� � an American, an older person, and certainly not myself.
I edited her post to correct it � quite mildly � but as circumstance would have
it, I was already late for an appointment and had to leave before I could PM her to
let her know why I�d made the edit. I returned 4 hours later to find that all hell had broken
loose, and that she was protesting she�d been �censored�.
Corey took her side in the ensuing fracas, while Stacy continued to vent, very much out
of control. In one of her several very long posts she revealed that Corey had been in
extensive contact with higher authorities � one of whom was a �senior member of
the Church of Scientology�, which might raise an eyebrow or two � to assemble a
�dossier� on me and one other unnamed person that extended to over 70 pages. All
this can be read in detail on this thread:
The ensuing firefight, all of which was instigated by Stacy and Corey, resulted in Stacy being
unsubscribed, at which point Corey left of his own accord. He was never banned from the
forum.
What happened after that was that Corey opened a blog page, now taken down by him (but all
of which has been archived), which was brimming with falsehoods and a deliberate, concerted
attempt to smear Avalon publicly.
Coincidentally with that, he was now talking with David Wilcock, recounting a suddenly
highly polished, enhanced and embellished version of the hesitant and fragmented story
he�d told Christine. I wrote to David to warn him of the documented history, but he
was not interested. (Kerry also tried to warn David, but that, too, was not heeded.)
I have correspondence from one person who claimed to be intel-connected (this is unproven,
and there are reasons to doubt this, which is entirely another story) that Corey had,
in January 2015, been recorded under surveillance, without his knowledge or permission, and had
been planning with Stacy, in their home, what story to invent to tell David Wilcock. (His
webcam and computer audio had been remotely activated, something we all now know is simple
for the agencies to do.)
Again, this is unproven, but the claim was credible. It seemed that Corey was seeking
stardom (he needed the money, very urgently), and that while the intel agencies knew exactly
what was happening � they often do, of course � they were quietly sanctioning all this,
as it played right into their agenda.
It seems quite possible that Corey had NOT been instructed to go public with invented
or embellished stories, but that when he did, he received full, passive �support�. (Or
� the entire roll-out of events might have been pre-programmed, just like setting up
the cycle on a washing machine. This can be done, too.)
The same person who reported the existence of the surveillance video shared a screenshot
of a Skype text chat with Corey, in which Corey confirmed that he was �now on the
pay roll�, and referred to 'a superior'. What exactly that means is quite an interesting
question.
Even though this summary is a long one, there�s not nearly enough room here to dissect his
claims about the Secret Space Program, the �Blue Avians�, how he was a kind of selected
special envoy to major multilateral United-Nations-style ET meetings, the 100 Jupiter-sized spheres
that he claimed were in the Solar system (of course invisible, and undetectable by any
known means), and ridiculous extremes like the Hollow Earth.
Even his claim to have been age-regressed and memory-wiped was a direct copy-and-paste
of the extraordinary (but plausible and well-documented) claim by Michael Relfe from a decade and a
half earlier.
As I've explained previously, if he�d really had the experiences he claimed, he�d never
be allowed to talk. (Kerry and I were told that genuine Camelot whistleblower Henry Deacon
(real name Arthur Neumann), after his impromptu public statement on stage with Bob Dean at
the July 2009 Barcelona Exopolitics Conference that he had been to Mars, �would never be
allowed to talk about that again�: a prediction, or a warning, that appears to have been very
accurate.)
As I�ve also mentioned elsewhere, one might imagine the possibility of Ed Snowden having
his own show on Gaia. It'd never happen: he�d be marched away in handcuffs within hours
of appearing at the studio.
The extremely strong likelihood is that Corey is, as they say, �damaged goods�. (As
Richard Dolan said to Jimmy Church, rather in exasperation: �I think that there's something
desperately wrong with some of these individuals who come out as so-called whistleblowers.
There's something not right about them.�)
The same is very likely to be true of many claimed whistleblowers, of course, notably
quite a few that have been showcased on Miles Johnston�s �Bases� series, but also
elsewhere. Some are allowed to talk (i.e. they�re not stopped or punished), but the
agencies know full-well that they�re already compromised with implanted false memories,
so the result is opportunistically convenient public disinformation.
People who really tell the exact truth about highly sensitive material are usually silenced
pretty quickly � somehow. In 2008, I lost a good friend, who spoke out. His name was
Jon Danner. One of the nicest people on God's Earth.
Jon had recorded a short audio message that Kerry and I played at a conference, announcing
that he was planning to 'come out' to tell his astonishing true story live, in person,
over the coming months.
He was in perfect health, but collapsed and died three weeks later, while Christmas shopping
with his family.
Jon's grieving wife said this to me in a phone call: He didn't want to be famous, he didn't
want money. He just wanted to help everyone.
Anyone who is still of value to the agencies or the military, and is a valuable functioning
asset as part of a classified program, would never be allowed to go public. With one or
two possible exceptions among those who have ever claimed anything of note, it�s only
the malfunctioning former insiders who have ever said their piece and lived to tell the
tale.
That doesn�t mean those people aren�t genuine: it just means that their testimony
may well be flawed.
To reference one of the final scenes from the first Jason Bourne movie, when Bourne
tracks down his former handler and demands to know who he really is, he�s told:
�You�re US government property. You�re a malfunctioning 30 million dollar weapon.
You're a total goddamn catastrophe, and by God, if it kills me, you're going to tell
me how this happened." There�s a great deal of truth in those lines.
Does this mean that there may be grains of truth in some of Corey�s claims? Yes, of
course that�s possible. But the point is that, as with all disinformation (= part truth,
part falsehood), the unsavory mix is almost valueless for research purposes, and its intention
is always to confuse and muddy the waters, until no-one can see where they�re going
any more.
Disinformation is one of the agencies� most useful weapons, it�s pretty clever, and
it almost always works to plan. (That's why there's such a lot of it!)
Some of Corey�s claims may be founded in fact (the Secret Space Program is a reality,
of course, and there are good reasons to believe it�s really very advanced), some of his
claims may be consciously fictionalized (there are strong reasons to suspect this), and yet
some other details may well be implants. (Meaning, overlaid pseudo-realities injected under pain
of hypnosis, electronics, and/or drugs.)
The reality may be a mix of those three. One piece of data, to be analyzed in any way by
anyone who cares to, is Corey�s post here, in which he 'doesn't buy' the idea that he
was ever a Milab. (He changed his mind, later. Or, maybe, his 'mind was changed', as it were.)
* Omnisense already posted this and quite a bit else, but what he contributed appears
to have been overlooked.
An asset who�s more ideal still is someone who�s presenting disinformation, but is
totally sincere and believes everything they�re saying. Andy Basiago is a perfect example,
but this, too, is another story. This does not seem to be the case with Corey. It�s
known and documented that he�s well-capable of conscious deceit�. and the only question,
really, is where that stops.
For all these reasons, and quite a few more, the Avalon moderators (and almost everyone
who�s been following this saga closely) cannot support Corey's claims or in any way
hold them of value.
There are reasons why the 2014-2015 Secret Space Program Conference organizers didn�t
invite him or any other claimed whistleblowers to present their story. Their stance, which
they explained publicly, is that whistleblowers simply can't be relied on, wholesale, to provide
reliable information. (In passing, they also revealed that Corey had tried to organize
many of his followers to lobby on his behalf for him to be a speaker.)
Their stated position was that the safest way through the morass of misinformation and
disinformation was to support serious document research � an approach which Joseph Farrell
and Catherine Austin Fitts endorse very strongly � rather than wild, unverifiable, uncorroborated
testimony and rumor, which is currently proliferating everywhere and is of little or no serious
research value.
My intention to make all this clear mirrors Richard Dolan's own exasperation, that so
many people are taken in by this and other similar claims that are benefiting no-one
except those who (a) want to deceive us, and (b) want to cause friction and factionalization
in the alt community.
I'm no-one's enemy here. But, I am a friend of the truth. (And, fully on record, so is
Kerry Cassidy. As best I know, she agrees with everything I've stated here, though some
of the details of Corey's earlier interaction with the Avalon community she may not be fully
aware of.)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét