>> The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association  is pleased to welcome you to this online education
  program entitled "Documentation Essentials  For Pediatric SLPs: Articulating the Need
  for Skilled Services."
  Here with us today is Gennith Johnson, Associate  Director of health care services and speech-language
  pathology.
  Welcome, Gennith.
  >> Hi, Jill, thank you.
  I would first love to give a warm welcome  to Shannon Butkus, our speaker of the hour.
  Welcome, Shannon.
  >> Thank you.
  I'm really excited to be here.
  >> Great.
  Before we start, Shannon, let's talk a little  bit about why we planned this webinar.
  I know you have over 15 years of experience  as a clinician and over 10 years of experience
  as the owner of a private practice.
  I also understand you have an in-depth knowledge  of how to successfully advocate for patient
  benefits and provider reimbursement rates  at the state and national level.
  Not to mention you also have lots of experience  and involvement working with insurance companies
  and Government agencies on the development  of policies and implementation of Alternative
  Payment Models.
  So I was really excited to hear that you will  be presenting on these topics at the upcoming
  ASHA Private Practice Connect Conference in  July in Baltimore, Maryland.
  Why is this topic so important to you?
  And what are today's participants going to  walk away with to improve their practice?
  >> Well, I'm really passionate about making  sure children have coverage for speech therapy
  services.
  Over the past few years, I've had the opportunity  to interact with insurers from across the
  country.
  Many of them have expressed concerns about  the quality of documentation SLPs are submitting
  when they request prior authorization.
  That motivated me to really start thinking  more about documentation and what we could
  do as clinicians to make sure our kids got  the coverage they needed and deserved.
  So my hope today is that participants walk  away with ideas that they can immediately
  incorporate into their patient reports to  not only strengthen their coverage quality
  but include the likelihood that services will  be approved for coverage.
  >> Wonderful.
  Well, let's go ahead and get started.
  I can't wait to hear more.
  And this sounds like a topic that our members  will find really, really relevant for their
  practice.
  >> Perfect.
  So today's title "Documentation Essentials  for Pediatric SLPs: Articulating the Need
  for Skilled Services," I want to briefly start  with my disclosures.
  I do have financial disclosures.
  ASHA is providing me compensation to give  this presentation today.
  And then I'm also owner of a pediatric speech-language  pathology practice as well as co-owner of
  a health care consulting company.
  Non-financial disclosures, as well.
  I'm a member of ASHA's Health Care Economics  Committee And I'm also ASHA's Texas State
  Advocate for Reimbursement.
  So the framework for today's presentation,  we're really going to dive into four things.
  We're going to do a brief introduction where  I'll give you some practical tips.
  And then we'll do a description of the disorder  that necessitates intervention and an explanation
  of how those disorders impact what I call  a patient's functional communication in safety.
  Then we're going to dive into goal writing  and we'll end with discharge criteria.
  So let's get started.
  Introduction I'm seeing more and more that  the trend for short, concise patient reports
  is becoming a thing of the past.
  As insurers scrutinize the costs they are  spending on services, one of the ways they
  do that is through a tool called utilization  management.
  And for us, that means we're going to see  prior authorization become more and more common.
  Because of that, what we write is very likely  going to determine whether our patients' services
  are deemed medically necessary.
  If they are deemed medically necessary, our  patients are going to qualify for services.
  And if they are not, then even when our kids  may have coverage, if our documentation doesn't
  reflect the need for skilled services, an  insurance company is likely to deny that.
  So it's really important that we think about  what we're writing, especially when we know
  we have to submit it for prior authorization.
  So using the strategies we discuss today,  our hope is that we're going to strengthen
  the quality of your patient report and improve  the chances that your request for speech therapy
  interventions are approved.
  So I want to start with practical tips.
  First and foremost, don't underestimate the  importance of formating.
  You want to use headings.
  You want to organize your information in a  logical sequence.
  And a you definitely don't want to make your  doctors or insurer hunt for your information.
  On average, insurers reviewing our requests  for speech therapy services may have between
  five and seven minutes per case review.
  That means they are going through them very  quickly.
  And they are expecting to see things flow.
  If they can't find it quickly, it's really  unlikely that they are going to hunt for it.
  And this probably seems logical.
  But we want to spell and grammar check reports.
  I've previously done some co-presentations  with insurers who have provided me sample
  documentation.
  And one of their concerns is, our reports  are poorly written.
  We're not spell checking them.
  We're not doing a grammar check.
  And in some instances, we're even using patient  names that don't correspond to the patient
  that we're actually talking about on any given  day.
  Other practical tips, we need to work efficiently.
  If our patient reports are going to get longer  than what we have done in the past and I suspect
  they are going to, we have to work smart.
  We have to use templates whenever we can.
  But I want to stress the importance of not  cutting and pasting clinical information.
  If you begin to write the same thing for every  patient every time, savvy insurers are going
  to notice those patterns.
  And they will start to deny your requests.
  Not necessarily because your patient doesn't  have a need for skilled services.
  But because they don't feel it's been individualized  to the unique needs of your patient.
  Other ways to work efficiently.
  It's helpful to develop standardized descriptions  for each assessment you use.
  Don't reinvent the wheel.
  Those are things you can cut and paste in.
  A description for a (inaudible) or a PLS 5  doesn't change from patient to patient report.
  So grab those and cut those in.
  And also, come up with a predesigned table  that you can insert your standardized assessment
  results into quickly.
  Be sure to include your raw scores, your standard  scores, your age equivalence, and your percentile
  rates.
  An insurer may want to see some combination  of all of those things when making a determination
  of medically necessary speech therapy services.
  Then it's also important that we know the  requirements of your payer scores.
  Typically speaking, Medicare Part B guides  documentation.
  But every insurer can establish its own documentation  requirements.
  This is especially true for Medicaid managed  care organizations.
  Many of us listening today probably have Medicaid  managed care organizations that we work with
  Some of you may only have one or two that  you have to work with.
  Others of you may have 10 to 12 or even more.
  And every single one of those insurers can  come up with unique items that they want you
  to discuss in your patient report.
  So with that in mind, you need to make sure  that your EMR or documentation template has
  enough flexibility to meet the individual  requirements of your payer.
  So my suggestion is that you set up your EMR  or your documentation template so that you
  document to your most restrictive payer 100%  of the time It's better to have extra information
  in your patient report than forget to include  something.
  If you make it a habit of documenting to your  most restrictive payer each and every time,
  you'll reduce the number of times requests  are sent back and forth between you and the
  insurer as being incomplete.
  Now, those are a few practical tips.
  The next thing I want to do is really get  into the meat of this, which is report writing,
  and discuss what I consider to be three key  elements of patient reports
  The first is what I call Impact on Functional  Communication and Safety And I ask myself
  three things: Do my goals aim to improve the  care and reduce costs through prevention?
  Do my goals increase safety?
  And does the intervention increase my client's  independence?
  If I can answer yes to any or all of those  things, then I'm beginning to build a case
  that my declined has a medically necessary  reason for speech therapy services.
  So beyond that, we're going to talk about  goal writing.
  And I'm going to focus on SMART goals.
  Both for long-term goals as well as short-term  And then we're going to end with discharge
  planning, what's the end goal of treatment?
  So let's dive right in.
  First and foremost, Impact on Functional Communication  and Safety.
  The first question I ask is: Do my goals aim  to improve care and reduce costs through prevention?
  And here is an example: Would improved swallow  function reduce the likelihood of hospitalization
  or reduce a patient's reliance on a G-tube?
  If you can answer yes to that question, then  your client qualifies for medically necessary
  for speech therapy services.
  Your interventions will ultimately result  in a cost savings to the insurer.
  And your services are not only beneficial  to the patient in that instance, but they
  are also deemed beneficial to the insurer,  because it lowers their overall costs.
  Then we want to look at whether the goals  increase safety.
  For example, would a child have an increased  ability to communicate safety information
  in the event of an emergency situation?
  If you're working with a patient that can't  currently express their name, their family's
  name, a phone number, or even what's wrong,  then there's a need for skilled intervention.
  Another thing I think about is whether my  patients comprehend the words no and stop.
  And if they don't comprehend the words no  and stop, it places them at risk.
  For example, if you're crossing a street and  a patient -- you're holding your son or daughter's
  hand and they get separated from you and you  yell no and stop, if a child doesn't understand
  that and they run into the street, there's  a chance that they could be harmed.
  And so we want to consider those things.
  If they don't understand no and stop, then  that's a reason that they may need skilled
  intervention.
  Another is whether the child's articulation  and language delays place them at risk for
  social isolation or bullying.
  Unfortunately in this day and age, bullying  is becoming an increasingly alarming problem.
  And if a kid is at risk for bullying because  they are being teased or ridiculed or excluded
  as a result of their speech and language delay,  then there's a skilled need for intervention.
  So I think about all of those things when  I'm writing my section titled: Functional
  communication and safety.
  Another thing I think about is independence.
  Would my goals support a reduced reliance  on a caregiver or other individual?
  If what I'm doing during treatment increases  their independence so that they can move through
  their day with a reduction in support, my  patients have a need for medically necessary
  speech therapy services.
  So let me show you what that looks like.
  Here is one example of something we might  write: Sam's language delays have a substantial
  negative impact on her functional communication  and safety.
  She is not able to use words to express her  wants and needs nor is she able to state the
  site of pain or injury.
  Additionally, she cannot state when she is  not feeling well.
  As a result, her family members and caregivers  must infer all of her needs, making it difficult
  for them to know exactly what is wrong with  Sam and when her family should/shouldn't take
  her to the doctor.
  She is at high risk of injury due to her inability  to follow simple commands such as stop, wait,
  and don't touch.
  Further, her communication delays prevent  her from engaging in social and play activities
  with same-age peers, causing periods of social  isolation.
  That brief paragraph, all of four to five  sentences, is a clear reflection to the insurer
  how the delays I have identified through my  testing and evaluation process impact my client.
  And when they see a statement like that, it  hits home specific reasons why my client needs
  speech therapy services.
  Here is one more example: Based on the information  collected during the assessment, Liam's delays
  have a negative impact on his ability to functionally  communicate across all environments.
  At this time he is not using language to interact  with other children his age.
  And he prefers to isolate himself rather than  play with other kids.
  Additionally, reduced speech intelligibility,  secondary to difficulty obtaining adequate
  airflow to support sustained speech, limits  his ability to relate information to others,
  including his parents and preschool teachers.
  Further, he is not participating in conversational  exchanges as would be expected for a child
  his age and he often wanders the room rather  than engage with other children.
  He is at risk of not advancing to his next  classroom at a day care due to social communication
  delays, which would result in him being placed  in a different classroom than his twin sister.
  Again, while that paragraph is a bit longer,  it provides a clear explanation to the insurer
  why I need to provide speech therapy services.
  I see these summary paragraphs are very beneficial  to an insurer when they are making a determination
  either yes, they are going to pay for your  speech therapy services, or no, they are not.
  And framing it in terms of the impact on your  patient's functional communication and safety
  really makes it hit home for them.
  Now, moving on to goal writing.
  I want to really quickly cover the International  Classification of Function, Disability and
  Health, this is called the ICF.
  The ICF is a classification of health and  health-related conditions for children and
  adults that was developed by the World Health  Organization.
  The ICF framework is intended to be used in  an interprofessional collaborative practice.
  And really in person-centered care.
  The ICF is endorsed by ASHA as well as APTA  and AOTA.
  And insurers are actually looking to see if  we're writing goals with the ICF in mind.
  In this particular example, this is in Texas.
  But the Texas Health and Human Services Commission  actually released a document stating it was
  their expectation that providers write short-  and long-term goals using the ICF framework.
  So what are the components of the ICF?
  There's functioning and disability, which  encompasses body functions and structures.
  And then activity and participation.
  There's also contextual factors.
  These are environmental factors, which are  factors that are not within the patient's
  control, such as family, work, Government  agencies, laws and cultural beliefs.
  And then there are personal factors, which  include things like race, gender, age, and
  education level  So what does the ICF mean for us?
  Short- and long-term goals must focus on function.
  Goals should be measurable, developed in conjunction  with the patient and family, specific to the
  patient's needs.
  We can't rely on a preset group of goals that  we use for all of our patients.
  Again, that's a pattern that our insurers  will detect over time.
  Our goals have to be specific to the setting  where the services are provided.
  This is particularly relevant for services  in the home and community setting.
  More and more in pediatrics when we submit  requests for prior authorization I'm seeing
  insurers say, if you want to provide services  outside of the clinic, then you need to justify
  why.
  So if you're going to do services in the home  or in the community, say a preschool, make
  sure you clearly relate your goals back to  those settings.
  So how do we do this?
  We write SMART goals.
  SMART goals are specific, they are measurable,  they are attainable, they are realistic, and
  they are timely.
  Another thing insurers look at, if prior authorization  is required for continued services, reviewers
  will look to see if your patients mastered  their goals.
  You want to make sure that you set goals that  your patients can reasonably accomplish.
  If you set lofty goals and your patients come  up short of those goals, even though they
  may have made wonderful progress, you could  see an insurer say to you, well, the patient
  failed to master their goals.
  It doesn't actually look like the speech therapy  services are beneficial So we're not going
  to approve the request for continued services.
  So make sure that you keep that in mind.
  What can your patients reasonably accomplish  in the timeframe that you select?
  So what are functional goals?
  Functional goals represent a series of behaviors  or skills that allow a patient to achieve
  an outcome relevant to their safety and independence,  there are those goals again, safety and independence,
  within the context of an everyday environment.
  So SMART goals must be specific.
  They have to be objectively measured.
  And within a given timeframe.
  Are you setting goals that you intend to measure  within an eight-week period, within a three-month
  period, within a six-month period?
  That's often going to be determined by your  payer source.
  So you may have to adjust those from payer  source to payer source.
  You'll also want to look at what -- how attainable  your goals are in relation to your client's
  progress and/or developmental delay.
  So you really have to think about kids in  the absence of a developmental delay may be
  able to make progress at a faster pace than  our kids who do present with developmental
  delays, autism, Down syndrome, cerebral palsy.
  So make sure to keep that in mind when you're  setting your goals.
  And then relevant to the client and family.
  Although I don't cover it in this workshop,  one of the things that we do include in our
  patient report is a statement of the family  goals.
  And then as we develop our own goals, we make  sure that those goals tie directly back to
  the client and family's goals Chances are  if you write goals without input from the
  client and the family, and they don't happen  to be important to them, you're not going
  to have a lot of family support.
  And in the absence of family support, your  patient's rate of progress may slow.
  And if their rate of progress may slow, then  it may be harder over time to get continued
  services, even if your patient needs those  services.
  And then your goals also have to be based  on medical need.
  Again, think what is the impact on their functional  communication and safety.
  Again, more and more insurers are paying attention  to goals that are medical in nature versus
  goals that are academic in nature.
  And if you write goals that are academic in  nature, while your kids may have a need for
  speech therapy services, an insurer could  look at those goals and say, those appear
  to be goals that could be accomplished in  an academic setting and they might deny them.
  Now, thinking to recertification requests,  you're always going to want to include your
  previous authorization period's goals and  provide an update on progress.
  And I'm going to cover an example of that  here in a few slides.
  But let's talk now about long-term goals.
  Long-term goals should reflect the highest  level of desired function anticipated upon
  discharge.
  I always suggest to individuals that they  think hierarchically.
  What's the most complex skill you're trying  to achieve within your designated timeframe?
  Identify this and then designate that as your  long-term goal.
  Here is an example of what we shouldn't write  when we're thinking about long-term goals.
  Patients will develop age-appropriate articulation  skills.
  Or patients will develop age-appropriate receptive  and express language skills.
  That's a very generic goal that doesn't really  tell the insurer why the speech therapy services
  are important.
  So instead of that goal, we might want to  write something that's more specific.
  Within 6 months, the patient will demonstrate  the ability to participate in conversational
  exchanges for up to 8 volleys in order to  maintain conversations with peers and relate
  critical medical and safety information to  adults.
  That goal is time bound, within 6 months.
  It's specific.
  It's measurable.
  And I also state why the goal is important,  which is a key for insurers.
  In terms of short-term goals, we want to state  why we're working on the particular skill.
  I think of these as the building blocks required  to master a long-term goal.
  I always have my therapists write short-term  goals framed around these key statements.
  The patient will XYZ in order to.
  Or the patient will blank so that.
  And then to reduce.
  To prevent.
  To increase.
  To decrease.
  When you add the second component of these  statements, you automatically tie your goal
  to a function.
  And you provide the reason.
  And that's what our insurers are looking to  see.
  So if you can write your short-term goals  in this type of pattern, you'll increase the
  likelihood that a reviewer will look at these  and say, these are medically necessary goals.
  So here is an example of what we should not  write.
  Sam will increase her knowledge of object-functions  from 35 objects to greater than 50 objects.
  It's not necessarily a bad goal.
  But it's not time bound.
  And it doesn't state why the goal is important.
  Instead, we could reframe that goal so that  it said, within 3 months, Sam will increase
  her knowledge of object-functions from 35  objects to greater than 50 objects in order
  to carry out at least 10 activities of daily  living in her home environment.
  Now that I've couched that goal in this manner,  same goal, but I've made it time bound.
  And I've stated the reason why the goal is  needed.
  In this particular instance, this patient  needs to increase their ability to complete
  activities of daily living.
  An insurer is going to look at that and say,  this goal makes sense to me.
  I understand why there's a need to work on  it.
  Here is another example, within 6 months,  Sam will follow 1-step directions to increase
  -- there is one of my key phrases -- her independence  during the completion of at least 5 home routines
  And here is my example, it's time to brush  your teeth.
  Go get your toothbrush.
  Writing the goal in this manner makes it very  relatable to the insurer.
  Now, some practical tips.
  Make sure that you select goals that are consistent  with the information provided in your patient
  report.
  Does the information about the Impact on Functional  Communication and Safety relate to the goals
  you've written?
  And is the information regarding the impact  on the patient's functional communication
  and safety consistent with the areas of weakness  you identified?
  You want to make sure that all of those things  cohesively work together.
  If you comment on impact and functional communication  and safety related to a child's feeding and
  swallowing but then turn around and write  a goal for a pragmatic, an insurer is probably
  going to touch that and say, where did this  come from?
  It doesn't make sense to me.
  So make sure all of that information cohesively  works together.
  Now, other practical tips.
  If you're going to continue a goal from one  plan of care to the next, which does happen
  from time to time, be sure that you don't  write the goal verbatim.
  You want to update the goal to reflect what  the patient has achieved so far.
  And where you hope to get them during the  next certification period.
  And here is an example.
  If the original goal was that the patient  will produce the phoneme /s/ in all positions
  of words with greater than 80% accuracy and  they have achieved 40% proficiency you can
  write a subsequent goal that says, the patient  will increase their ability to produce the
  phoneme /s/ in all positions of words from  40% accuracy to greater than 80% accuracy
  in order to -- and then you could continue  on with that to tie it back to the specific
  reason you're working on the goal.
  Another practical tip.
  As silly as this might seem, make sure that  you report progress so that it matches how
  the goal is written.
  If you write a goal that your criteria is  for 80% mastery be sure to report progress
  as 7 out of 10 trials.
  I think we're all thinking here that that  ought to be easy enough for an insurer to
  understand, don't assume that they will make  that conversion for you.
  Just instead of 7 out of 10 trials, write  the 70% of trials.
  I have actually heard of some instances where  reports were sent back for additional information
  because there was a mismatch in how the progress  was reported.
  Another practical tip.
  Some of your insurers will require that you  report the baseline level of performance,
  especially in instances where your patient  hasn't mastered the goal.
  So if you have a goal within 3 months, the  patient will label a minimum of 25 objects
  in order to communicate their wants and needs  to primary caregivers, you could document
  as follows: The patient's ability to label  objects and make requests increased from 3
  objects to 15 objects.
  The patient is consistently using 10 words  to make requests.
  Alternatively, you could do it as follows:  The patient is labeling 15 objects and is
  consistently using 10 words to make requests.
  And then you'll see I clearly designate baseline,  the patient demonstrated the ability to label
  3 objects at the start of this plan of care.
  You can report that in either way.
  Just be sure to report it.
  Again, I know of instances where insurers  will send requests back if clinicians have
  failed to include the baseline level of performance.
  Now, manufacturing on to the last area, discharge  planning.
  And this might seem to some of you like a  silly one to include.
  Why is my discharge planning that important?
  Again, as prior authorization becomes a more  common strategy and insurers are thinking
  more and more about the cost of care, they  want to understand that you have a discharge
  plan.
  And that you don't intend to keep your patient  on services indefinitely.
  You know, in the model of the past, it has  not necessarily been uncommon that we bring
  a kiddo on for speech therapy services at  the age of 2 or 3 and that they are continued
  on with services at the age of 5, 6, 8, 10  years of age And we're moving beyond that
  model.
  And insurers want to understand and see that  you're thinking about that.
  So this means we have to think about what  the beginning, the middle, and the end of
  treatment is from the day we bring that child  onto services.
  Treatment in this instance then becomes something  that is not lifelong.
  We need to be identifying what family community  resources may be available to support the
  patient.
  And we need to think about how we can transition  our clients from our setting to those settings
  as soon as it's feasible.
  But I will add, without compromising the quality  of care our patients are receiving.
  So when we identify discharge criteria, we  need to use the information generated when
  discussing that Impact on Functional Communication  and Safety And again, I've taken what I consider
  that key section.
  And I'm tying it now to my discharge plan.
  I want to talk about a document quickly that  was developed by ASHA.
  It's called the Admission/Discharge Criteria  in Speech-Language Pathology Ad Hoc Committee
  on Admission and Discharge.
  It was created by members of ASHA that were  speech-language pathologists.
  This document becomes important not only because  it gives us suggestions on when we should
  consider discharge for our patients, but also  because insurers, during the audit process,
  are using it to determine whether we have  discharged our patients at an appropriate
  time.
  And I have seen some instances in reports  produced by the Office of Inspector General
  where they have found that speech-language  pathologists potentially didn't discharge
  their patients when it was appropriate.
  And so per this document, patient and client  discharge from treatment ideally occurs when
  the individual family or designated guardian,  as well as the speech-language pathologist,
  conclude that the communication or feeding  and swallowing disorder a remediated or when
  compensatory strategies are successfully established.
  And then they give multiple suggestions.
  And I'm not going to read them all to you.
  Because you'll have this as a reference But  one is that the speech, language, communication,
  or feeding and swallowing disorder is now  defined within normal limits or is consistent
  with the individual's pre-morbid status.
  That's probably one of the ones we're most  familiar with.
  Another is that the goals of treatment have  been met and the patient can functionally
  communicate.
  Another includes that the individual's speech  and language communication or swallowing skills
  no longer adversely affect their individual's  educational, social, emotional, or vocational
  performance.
  So here we're not necessarily saying that  their scores are all within the average range.
  But we are saying the patient can functionally  communicate to navigate through their environment.
  And that's what an insurer is looking to see  Now, there may be other instances where discharge
  is warranted prior to mastery of treatment  goals.
  That could include an instance where you have  an unwilling patient, where treatment attendance
  has been inconsistent or poor, and where you've  taken efforts to address those items.
  But you don't have family support in return.
  You may have a family that requests to be  discharged to move to another service provider
  or you could have a family that is not in  your service area.
  And in that instance, if that occurs, then  we really have a responsibility to help that
  family try to locate a provider within their  new home territory.
  There may be an additional reason for discharge  that's appropriate, including if your treatment
  no longer results in measurable benefit.
  So here we're not saying that the patient  has mastered their goals.
  But we are saying the patient's progress has  plateaued.
  And if you have reached a point where your  patient's progress has plateaued, even if
  they haven't met all of their goals, it's  time to consider whether discharge is appropriate.
  And if discharge would be appropriate, then  we need to discharge the patient, even if
  we're in the middle of an authorization period.
  And referencing back to the Office of Inspector  General, this is where they cited concern.
  They were reviewing treatment notes.
  They saw clinicians were documenting essentially  the same level of performance and progress
  from treatment session to treatment session,  from week to week to week to week.
  And rather than discontinuing those services,  say after a four- to six-week period, or having
  a conversation with the family if there was  an adjustment that needed to be made in their
  plan of care, they stayed the course to the  end of the authorization period and didn't
  discharge the client.
  And that was concerning to the auditor.
  Another reason it might be appropriate to  discharge is because the patient has a serious
  medical, psychological, or other condition,  or if you experience behaviors with your client
  that are interfering with their improvement  in participation.
  And in those instances, it may be need to  take a break from services, help them case
  manage their needs with other service providers,  and then readmit them to your practice at
  the point in time in which they are stable  to continue and make progress towards goals.
  Thinking these things through will really  help you be successful in writing your patient
  reports.
  So a few practical tips with respect to discharge  planning.
  You want to avoid these statements, don't  write something that says, when maximum potential
  is met.
  Or when functional potential is met Those  statements will probably be flagged by your
  insurer and sent back to you for more information  because they are really not specific.
  They don't demonstrate to the insurer anything  about the beginning, the middle, and the end
  of treatment  So here is an example, discharge is not expected
  within the next 6 months due to the severity  of Sam's delays and the complexity of the
  goals established.
  Discharge will be considered when Sam can  successfully: Follow directions to assist
  in the completion of activities of daily living.
  Use words/approximations to state her wants  and needs to her primary caregivers.
  And when Sam can state the site of injury  or illness to assist in her medical care.
  I based my discharge criteria on the things  I wrote in my section titled Impact on Functional
  Communication and Safety.
  So I've essentially written that section I've  now written goals that are consistent with
  that section.
  And here my discharge planning is consistent  with my goals and consistent with my section
  titled Impact on Functional Communication  and Safety.
  When I have information that's that seamless,  it shows to the insurer I have a plan.
  And again, that plan increases the likelihood  of coverage.
  Here is a second example.
  Discharge is not expected over the next 6  months as Sam has a number of skills he needs
  to acquire before achieving the ability to  functionally communicate.
  Long term, the SLP anticipates discharge when  Sam can complete the following tasks: Transition
  through his day with a minimal number of protest  behaviors.
  Initiate and maintain social relationships  with peers.
  Use short sentences to comment on activities  and express his wants and needs.
  And ask and answer questions in a conversation  at format to provide critical personal and
  safety information.
  Again, I'm telling that seamless story.
  And I'm showing to the insurer from Day 1  I'm thinking about discharge.
  Therefore, I'm increasing the likelihood of  coverage
  So a few concluding thoughts.
  When we're documenting medical necessity,  your client's coverage and your ability to
  seek reimbursement through an insurer is dependent  on the quality of your documentation.
  Unfortunately, as insurance requirements increase,  the length of our reports are likely to increase.
  So you want to make sure that you plan accordingly  and make sure you give yourself and your staff
  adequate time to write your patient reports.
  In my practice, we used to be able to write  a patient report in an hour to an hour and
  a half.
  I live in a state where we have seen some  pretty significant increases in expectations
  relating to our documentation and evaluation  reports.
  Because of that, I now have to a lot two to  two and a half hours for my SLPs to write
  patient reports.
  But because we're willing to spend the time  upfront and make sure we get the patient report
  right and correct, we have better than a 98%  approval rating.
  And we have really almost eliminated the time  we have to spend during the appeals process
  in fighting for coverage.
  And for us, that extra time upfront makes  it more than worth it.
  So make a goal.
  Now that we're at the end of this workshop,  let's think about one thing you can implement
  from this course in the next week or month.
  One item, if you don't already have it, might  be to build in that section titled Impact
  on Functional Communication and Safety.
  And really spend the next month integrating  those into your patient reports.
  You would want to set a calendar reminder  to check your progress.
  And when you do, share your experience on  social media so we all know how it's working.
  Thanks so much for joining us today.
  It's been a pleasure to give this workshop.
  >> Thank you so much, Shannon, for sharing  so much helpful information.
  I'm really looking forward to hearing more  at the upcoming ASHA Private Practice Connect
  Conference in Baltimore this July.
  Thank you, again, to all of our participants.
  And we hope to see you at another webinar  soon.
  Goodbye for now from the ASHA National Office.
     
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét