(I'm bored)
Hey!
Are you nuts?
Well, sort of! (being Coconut Cream)
By the way..
Monkey business today? /"to have a monkey" in Czech = being drunk/
Taking your job with you, eh? /usually also means "stealing something from your job"/
(moron)
Subtitles: Martin Lux
For more infomation >> Coconut is nuts (animated comics) - Duration: 1:56.-------------------------------------------
What is CBD and is it legal? - Duration: 7:01.
What's up you guys I just wanted to make this video
Because on one of my other CBD oil review videos
I had mentioned about how I was gonna make a video about what CBD is
if it's legal or not, and it's gonna link it to that one and
You know, I wrote down some information. I know about CBD
So that's what I'm gonna be explaining in the video for you guys. So let me start off
What is CBD?
CBD or otherwise known as cannabidiol is one of about 80 known phytocannabinoids known to exist
within the cannabis plant and can also be found in the hemp plant
These different phytocannabinoids are known to exist in different levels in different cultivars of cannabis
And CBD concentrations can be very high in CBD rich cultivars of industrial hemp
What is CBD oil? It's the extracted botanical essences of the plant
such as heavy oils and resins from the legal cannabis plant
Which is the hemp plant if you didn't know that...
That are basically juice under high pressure to get the bulk CBD in concentrated form
How can CBD oil help you?
CBD oil is used by people for anxiety and many other related health issues
reason being is because natural cannabinoids CBDs are
phytonutrients that feed very important primal internal systems in your body
Meant to receive them which will work to balance and calm the body from inflammation and oxidative stress
Now here's the big question right here for a lot of you is hemp CBD oil legal?
Now yes it is it is legal in all 50 states in over 45 countries
That's because it's "hemp derived"
And because CBD from hemp has no
psychoactive effects
So yeah, it has no psychoactive effects the purchase sales or possession of hemp
CBD products are completely legal in all 50 states and over 45 countries
this is true because hemp is a great source of food and
can be considered as a
Dietary supplement and is permissible to import through u.s
Customs and other approved countries without any issue whatsoever. As long as there is low to no THC
Therefore hemp derived CBD is completely legal and enjoys the rights of any other Legal product
Will you test positive on a drug test if you use CBD hemp oil?
The answer is no but first let me remind you that CBD is still a cannabinoid
But it does differ from THC
THC is the cannabinoid that gives its users the "high" feeling and it's this cannabinoid that is
specifically being targeted and drug test these tests look for the metabolic products of THC and
begin with a simple urine test sample
these series of tests are targeting THC and
Aren't sensitive to other cannabinoids
including CBD
There is no such thing as a CBD drug test because CBD is not a drug
Are you guys so that like I said, this was some information that you know, I know
like right now and always I'm always looking at
You know learning more about CBD and CBD oil and whatnot and all that stuff in you can find
You can find a lot of this information over the internet
You know about you know, what is CBD and if it's legal and what not
You know hemp oil, you know the hemp plant
You know that you can find some of a lot of this stuff on the internet
and like also to like I said on this video I am gonna
You know have links since I'm not I'm going to have links on the bottom of this video
you know for other CBD oils that I do review and like I said
I do try my best to be very honest and genuine and those reviews about them, you know, because that's very important
It's like this stuff should be brought more
This should be brought more attention to the public because this stuff CBD is amazing
It can help a lot of people
You know dealing with like anxiety or you know many other health issues and in time
Also, too I want to mention in time
I do want to have a website, you know about this and I will include this information on there you know what CBD is
If it's legal and whatnot and like I said, I'm going to have you know
I will include you know my video reviews and you know, probably just like have you know?
blog reviews about other CBD brands and you know review those oils for you guys because it's like
It's like I said, this is something I do enjoy, you know learning about and I do want to bring it more attention to the public
about CBD and stuff, you know, do what I can and like I said
You know
If you can when you head over to the links at the bottom if you do buy something on there
I do make Commission off of it, but it's I'm not trying to make you know a quick buck without, you know
Helping other people. I know like at the same time. It's like I can help other people
With this information and you know, it's it's kind of a it's very rewarding, you know, we can help other people
There's just something about it helping other people and you know educate people about about this because this is stuff
I think a lot of people
don't really know what CBD is and they might have they might have an idea about it, but are kind of still confused and what not
And like I said if you guys can will you head over to the links
on on these websites the CBD oil websites
They do have a lot of this information already on there about what is CBD and you know if it's legal and whatnot
They have all that information on those websites, and if you can when you get over to the link, you know
click on the link page
if you can
please bookmark it and
Feel free on this video to comment and you know leave questions and I will do my best to you know
Get back to the comments and questions from the video
You don't do what I can to help you guys out answer you guys question is if you can like, you know
If you can share this video, that'll be so awesome
I'd really appreciate that and for the most part you guys. Thank you
Thank you for giving me your time to do this video and enjoy your day. Thank you
-------------------------------------------
Which Is Better in Performing Duha Prayer? - Duration: 2:16.
About Duha prayer, the hadith explicitly indicates that it's better performing it at Masjid
That's why the scholars have different opinions
About which is more beneficial in case Duha Prayer
and which is more perfect
Performing it at Masjid or at house?
Some scholars say that performing it in the three Masjids is better
Masjidil Haram, Masjid Nabawi, Masjidil Aqsa
The second opinion from our scholars, they say: every Masjids
Every Masjids is better
The third opinion, they say: at house is better
The scholars who say performing at house is better
They deduce with two dalils
They deduce with two dalils
The first dalil...
The Prophet -peace be upon him- says ...
"The best prayer of a man when he performing it at house, except fard (obligatory) prayer"
The second, a hadith in Sahih Muslim and also other book of hadits...
The Prophet -peace be upon him- says, as narrated by Aisha
"That he performs Duha prayer 4 rakaat before goes out from his house"
... from Aisha's house -may Allah bless her-
... from Aisha's house -may Allah bless her-
The best opinion in my view...
This hadith, if we combine it with the other hadiths in this title
That Duha prayer is better performing it at Masjid for who wants to wait for Zuhr prayer
If he goes to Masjid for Duha prayer
And also to wait for Zuhr prayer, then it's better for him
But if a person wants to pray Duha prayer and intends to go out for working after that
Then performing it at house it better
Based on the combination several hadiths
There is another opinion..
Some scholars say, the point of...
The saying of the Prophet "whoever wants to perform Duha prayer in the morning", it means: at Friday
That's only at Friday
There a hadith about it, but the hadith is not valid
The hadith is very weak if we analize the sanad
-------------------------------------------
Anticipating A Russian Attack On The 2018 Election: What If Trump Is Right? - Duration: 12:24.
Anticipating A Russian Attack On The 2018 Election: What If Trump Is Right?
What if, this time around, a wave of foreign interference is aimed at helping Democrats take control of Congress?.
It's an idea that has been batted around a great deal since 2016.
It is based on the thesis that Russian President Vladimir Putin doesn't actually care about either party.
What he wants is chaos, strife, deadlock and a corrosion of faith in U.S.
political institutions.
To that end, what better way to bring about another upheaval than by trying to whipsaw the political balance from Trump and Republicans to the putative return two years later of a House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her Democrats?.
President Trump sounded that warning last week on Twitter.
What if he's right?.
Russia's active measures against the U.S.
and the West never stopped after 2016, as the intelligence bosses keep saying, and Russian efforts are expected to continue through the 2018 and 2020 elections.
If the warning lights are already "blinking red," as Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats put it, the next question is: To what end?.
How might the Russians do it?.
The Russians could use a version of the playbook they ran in 2016: Deploy human operatives to mix things up, attack state elections infrastructure, steal information in cyberattacks and then dump it for maximum political effect — all the while turning up the volume on political controversy by agitating on social media.
Or they could attempt some new permutation of this scheme, perhaps by mixing in new, high-tech fake audio or video.
Or because they know how much Americans now know about the tools in this kit, there could be some other new strategy that no one is expecting.
Or there could be nothing.
With so much attention drawn by reporters and politicians to the election interference storyline, Putin might conclude a big push on election interference won't work unless it can benefit from the element of surprise.
So far, as Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen has said, there has not been as big a push as in 2016.
Still, some cyber mischief is underway: Microsoft says it has detected so-called spear-phishing attacks on at least three campaigns this year, though it didn't reveal which ones or how many total attacks it knows about.
One target who has identified herself does not suggest the Russians have switched sides: Missouri Sen.
Claire McCaskill, a Democrat, said cyberattackers had tried to get into her Senate office systems but failed.
"While this attack was not successful, it is outrageous that they think they can get away with this," McCaskill said in a statement Thursday.
"I will not be intimidated.".
If the scale is so far smaller than the hundreds of cyberattacks launched in 2016, national security leaders say these relatively light winds could turn into a typhoon at any moment.
"We fully realize that we are just one click of the keyboard away from a similar situation repeating itself," as Coats said recently.
Scattershot.
States are paying attention to election security more than they ever have, but as NPR's Miles Parks has reported, there are still 50 different policies and levels of readiness across the country.
In some places, elections officials are as ready as they'll ever be.
Others remain highly vulnerable.
Secretaries of state and elections officials across the country may not know how robust their preparations are until Election Day.
And there are broader issues.
Even if every election in the United States used 100 percent accountable and verifiable paper systems, there are no practical defenses against other weapons in the Russians' active-measures arsenal.
Facebook and Twitter vow that they're cracking down on the use of their platforms by foreign agitators, but they can't stanch everything, especially if influence-mongers return with a broad new wave that uses new accounts, new vectors or new techniques to piggyback on the networks.
Facebook, in particular, is depending more on the use of disclosures within ads on its site, not active countermeasures that bar them from appearing.
Another real problem — if that's the right phrase — is the free press.
If WikiLeaks or another pop-up intermediary began dumping embarrassing material about politicians, would American journalists politely refrain from covering it? Even if they did, the material would still get into the information ecosystem without them.
Reporters might include caveats in their stories — "the damning revelations about Politician X appeared to be part of an active measures campaign against the United States.
Now back to the damning revelations about Politician X ." — but they still would be serving the interests of the attackers.
In the case of an attack on behalf of Democrats, the arguments that Trump and Republicans used in 2016 might be turned against them: Who cares about the origins of this material — whether it came via Russia's military intelligence service or not? As long as it's legitimate, it's fair game.
Millions of Americans concluded the same thing during the 2016 cycle when WikiLeaks published emails hacked from the systems of leading Democratic Party figures — emails stolen, the Justice Department alleges, by Russia's military spy agency.
The Supreme Court has roundly rejected prior restraint, as one well-known constitutional scholar once observed.
Trump couldn't order news organizations not to cover revelations that had originated in a foreign cyberattack, even if he wanted to.
If the structural components of a new surge in attacks are easy to imagine, the politics are not.
Would it be better for Trump and Republicans to launch a full-on national response to a new spike in active measures? The president has said that is exactly what he would do.
But a wave of interference between now and Election Day also would enable Trump and Republicans to argue the outcome of the 2018 midterm elections, including the return of their reviled Speaker Pelosi, was illegitimate — in the same way Trump's supposed illegitimacy is a shibboleth for the self-styled "Resistance.
How strong the foundation.
What hasn't become clear following another all-cartwheeling, all-exploding set of headlines last week is Trump's basis for warning about a Russian campaign benefiting Democrats.
Is there real intelligence reporting that suggests Russian leaders intend to launch one or that one is underway now?.
Trump is in a position to know.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told Congress on Wednesday that he has briefed Trump extensively for months — previously as director of the CIA — about what the intelligence community is reporting about active measures.
Trump also sometimes denies that any interference is taking place and insists the whole story is a "hoax.
" He phases back and forth, and one consequence is that there is no way to know his own position on a given day and the resulting actions he might order.
Administration officials say that they're preparing no matter what and that the United States will take a much stronger stance against foreign interference than was done in 2016.
Pompeo told Congress that he had warned the Russians that any more attacks would be met with "severe consequences.
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said recently at the Aspen Security Forum that the Justice Department would begin publicly calling out foreign schemes and step up its efforts to defend American networks from cyberattacks.
-------------------------------------------
How is the package of a led profile spotlight? - Duration: 0:57.
Hello everyone , this is Wing from THE ONE STUDIO
today we are going to talk about our most popular product
The Die casting aluminum led profile spotlight
after you receive our package
you can see we have strong carton and the pearl cotton to protect this light during shipping
inside this carton
we have a fixture
the profile light
and user manual
power cable and dmx cable
of course
you can also buy other accessories
such as the
safety cable
clamp
and the iris
gobo holder
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét