Thứ Tư, 13 tháng 12, 2017

Waching daily Dec 13 2017

The internet may be about to change for millions of Americans.

The Trump administration are planning to roll back another Obama-era policy,

the protection of net neutrality.

The FCC, the Federal Communications Commission, will make a decision that could affect everything

from internet speeds, to overall access, to the amount it costs to go online.

Net neutrality is the idea that Internet Service Providers, or ISPs, should treat all internet traffic the same,

giving every consumer equal access to all content online.

That means large corporations, like Verizon or Comcast, cannot limit or manipulate

your online activity in order to favor their own business interests.

Net neutrality also aims to protect smaller companies from being strangled by larger companies.

Its advocates argue it ensures the internet remains a place for innovation,

which is why it's helped produce startup, after startup, after startup.

Since 2002, the FCC has classified broadband internet as an information service,

meaning cable providers couldn't be forced to share their infrastructure with competitors.

It wasn't until 2010 that the FCC adopted its Open Internet Order,

the first time net neutrality rules became official regulation.

However, three years later, Verizon successfully sued the FCC

arguing that if broadband providers were classified as just an information service,

it meant the FCC didn't have enough authority to enforce these rules.

Free and open access to the internet.

But in 2015, instead of backing down, the FCC, under Obama-appointed chairman Tom Wheeler,

reclassified ISPs as common carriers, essentially turning them into a public utility.

That gave the FCC much stronger oversight and the authority it needed to enforce net neutrality.

So why did the FCC take such strong action?

Well, as President Obama explained a year earlier,

'No service should be stuck in a slow lane because it doesn't pay a fee.'

Let's borrow President Obama's analogy for a moment.

Imagine the World Wide Web as a highway.

Under current FCC rules the majority of internet traffic moves at the same speed.

Whether you're streaming a TV series from Netflix or a smaller streaming service such as Mubi,

your ISP has to provide the same internet speed for both websites.

But without net neutrality, according to its supporters, Internet Service Providers like

AT&T could divide the internet they provide into multiple lanes, all going at different speeds.

To be in the fastest lane, websites would have to pay an additional fee.

This would force established sites such as Amazon, Facebook and Spotify

to pay up to stay ahead of the competition,

while smaller sites and startups could be priced out of the fastest lanes.

Now though, the Trump administration and the GOP have come out against net neutrality.

But why?

Some of net neutrality proponents say it's another attempt to reverse an Obama policy

or possibly to win the support of donors for the 2020 election campaign.

The top four internet service providers in the U.S., Verizon, AT&T, Charter and Comcast,

have spent tens of millions lobbying Congress.

But critics of net neutrality believe it can be counterproductive.

High profile Republicans such as Ted Cruz and Rand Paul argue that excessive regulation

of the internet discourages innovation and competition amongst ISPs.

19 small cable providers signed a letter to the FCC asking to end net neutrality,

saying that it was killing their businesses.

Another argument is that net neutrality rules make networks less profitable,

holding back investment in internet infrastructure.

For example, Verizon and Google have built new fiber optic networks

that are 50 times faster than ordinary networks.

But they can cost billions of dollars to build, so large parts of the country haven't received them yet.

Internet users may benefit from certain applications such as voice calling and online games,

which are particularly sensitive to delays in delivering data,

being given priority by companies who pay a premium.

The man leading the fight against net neutrality is the new Trump-appointed chairman of the FCC, Ajit Pai.

We want to give more consumers better, faster, cheaper internet

and getting rid of these heavy-handed economic regulations,

inspired in the Great Depression, is the way to do it.

Pai, who is a former lawyer for Verizon, has predicted that net neutrality's days are numbered.

He believes that Internet Service Providers should not have to be classified as a public utility

but instead could voluntarily agree to not obstruct or slow consumer access to web content.

At the same time, Republicans in Congress are currently working on legislation

to try and reverse some of the rules.

A recent poll found 52 percent of registered voters support net neutrality regulations,

but that's actually an eight point decline in support from a few months earlier.

But what's happening in the U.S. is not without precedent.

For net neutrality advocates Portugal provides an example of how without net neutrality

ISPs can steer users to favored websites and services, including their own.

Even countries with supposed net neutrality have created arrangements,

which allow national regulators more flexibility.

These regulators can open loopholes permitting 'zero-rating'

through which ISPs can exclude certain services and sites from data caps.

In the U.K., the ISP Vodafone, offers several passes for an additional cost,

which allow unlimited video and music streaming, as well as social media use.

But only some social media apps are included.

For instance, in this social media pass you've only got Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Pinterest.

But what about Snapchat, Tumblr, Reddit, Flickr and many more?

Back in the U.S., certain sites, including Netflix, have come out in support of net neutrality.

Some analysts believe that big content companies do not want to be forced into a bidding war,

but will run the risk of having their speeds reduced and access blocked

if they refuse to pay these additional costs to ISPs.

And if costs do increase then consumers may be the ones to foot the bill,

with wealthier users able to access the fastest speeds.

The Open Internet may no longer be a level playing field

for the many content creators and internet users around the world.

For more infomation >> What is net neutrality? | CNBC Explains - Duration: 6:44.

-------------------------------------------

كنبة سرير Thebed sofa bed Interiors Design is amazingly modern - Duration: 2:56.

For more infomation >> كنبة سرير Thebed sofa bed Interiors Design is amazingly modern - Duration: 2:56.

-------------------------------------------

"Bitcoin Is Gonna Crash!" - Duration: 2:03.

Have you heard about Bitcoin?

It's this cryptocurrency that a bunch of nerds and libertarian freaks are talking about.

Are they seriously still trying to make Bitcoin a thing?

"Oh, Bitcoin is the future."

"It's decentralized money that operates

outside of the central banks."

$100 for one Bitcoin?!

What kind of moron would buy that?

$600?!

Clearly it's in a bubble that's about to pop .

Those people are going to look so stupid.

Oops. $500.

Told ya so.

Bitcoin is over.

Oh? $700?

Well, it's going to crash very soon.

Any day now...

Just waiting...

Yeah, you'll see how right I am.

Bitcoin is going to crash.

I'm telling ya.

Get out while you can.

So, clearly I don't have a crystal ball and I can't predict the future.

But this cryptocurrency mania going on right now is fun.

I've invested some in Bitcoin and I like going on the website and seeing how much money I made that day.

I made $1,000 in one week doing absolutely nothing.

It's the American dream.

I'm not really trying to give financial advice here.

But if you want to try it out, I use the website Coinbase to buy bitcoin.

I know some people really invested into Bitcoin will chime in and say: "No, use this website instead."

But as an amateur, I've found that Coinbase is easy to

use, it's one of the most well-known sites, and it's credible.

I'm going to include my Coinbase referral link below.

If you click on it, create an account, and purchase $100 or more of Bitcoin

you get $10 free Bitcoin and so do I.

It's a win-win and everything is happy.

Of course, nothing is guaranteed.

But this Bitcoin, cryptocurrency thing is exciting and I'm looking forward to seeing what happens.

For more infomation >> "Bitcoin Is Gonna Crash!" - Duration: 2:03.

-------------------------------------------

Feds Say Photographer Facing Felonies After Trump Inauguration Arrest Is 'Fake' News - Duration: 5:09.

Feds say photographer facing felonies after Trump inauguration arrest is fake news a Justice Department

Prosecutor alleged this week that a photographer currently facing several felony charges in connection with his arrest during President Donald Trump s

Inauguration had a fake press pass under a false name

Alexei wood a 37 year old from San Antonio

Is currently on trial alongside five others in connection with his arrest on January 20th?

Police made more than 200 arrests that day after people smashed windows in downtown DC as a large group

mostly clad in black roamed the streets

Prosecutors have conceded there s. No evidence at any of the six individuals currently on trial actually caused any destruction

But say they are guilty of several felony charges for enabling what prosecutors have called arise there are

181 others facing felony

Trials over the next year and this first trial could determine how the office of the US attorney for the District of Columbia

Currently headed by a trump appointee handles the remainder of the cases

Wearing purple medical gloves assistant, US attorney Jennifer Kirk off on Wednesday dangled a lanyard and a press pass

Labeled as government exhibit 48

before Metropolitan Police Department detective Greg

Pemberton who has spent months pouring over the extensive video footage that captured the unrest in downtown DC on January 20th

Pemberton said there was no evidence

That would US identification was a legitimate press bench

Earlier in the week kerkhof suggested that wood had fake credentials under the false name of Janice Burton

Pemberton said Wednesday that John Osborne was not an alias for woods

But that the press passed that feature woods image would and his attorney brett cohen declined on wednesday to explain

What less apparent use of another name but would is expected to take the stand when the trial resumes next week?

There are a variety of types of press passes

So it is difficult to label any single pass is fake

while numerous government entities issue press passes that requires some sort of screening process news organizations

also ensure their own press passes

The pass wood was apparently carrying was purportedly issued by indie media or glass bead media collective according to court testimony

Woodleigh vest reamed nearly the entire protest on Facebook and the

prosecution played the whole video for jurors on Tuesday afternoon in Wednesday morning

The video does not show what engaged in any violence or destruction?

But does show him making comments

That could be seen as supportive of property destruction the video shows him getting into verbal

Confrontations with the man who apparently grabbed the demonstrator as well as a biker for drunk who tried to assist police officers in apprehending one

Individual my professionalism is certainly up to be criticized, and I am open to it

And I every welcoming of it would told HuffPost in a prior interview

But I absolutely stand by that I did nothing illegal, and I did nothing wrong

Kerkhof had told jurors in her opening statement that they DC would cheering when the destruction happens

Woodless attorney argued that his comments on the video while they may be disagreeable were directed not at the people around him

But rather at the audience watching his leave vestrum

Would who has worked as a wedding and commercial photographer says he came to DC in hopes of building his photojournalism resume?

officers on the scene released many of the journalists they detained in the mass arrests

But the decisions about who was allowed out of the police kettle seemed arbitrary

The government has presented as evidence a video featuring Lauren southern the aldra to YouTube commentator who was released without being arrested

Southern s team apparently had to mislead police to get out of the kettle I had to pretend

I was pregnant

Southern said in another video

My security had to yell C s pregnant to get me out of there in the full video

That was introduced at trial a male voice says he has got a pregnant lady coming out as they emerge from the kettle before Southern

Says weary media weary media of the nine journalists who were arrested that day only two are still facing charges

Alex Rubinstein who works with Russian funded route wrote a lengthy post this week detailing his experience and said a judge recently

exonerated him of the charges the government previously dropped

So far DC Superior Court Judge Lynn Lebovitz has given prosecutors wide latitude

regularly overruling objections from the sixth defendants legal team which outnumbers the jury

outside the presence of the jury on Tuesday libel

It's referred to one of would us remarks his commentary and furtherance of the conspiracy on

trial alongside would our Jennifer our Mentos, Oliver Harris Brett Lawson Michele Mackay

Oh and Christina Simmons the trial will resume Monday when the government is expected to wrap up its case if convicted of all charges

Would and his co-defendants would face a maximum of more than 60 years in prison though such a lengthy sentence is highly unlikely

The only defendant has pleaded guilty to a felony so far Dane Powell was sentenced to four months in prison for felony

writing and felony assault on a police officer

He admitted to actually smashing store windows and throwing rocks at officers

For more infomation >> Feds Say Photographer Facing Felonies After Trump Inauguration Arrest Is 'Fake' News - Duration: 5:09.

-------------------------------------------

Gwen Stefani Is In The Giving Mood | TMZ TV - Duration: 1:31.

I'M AT A PLACE CALLED HOME,

STARBUCKS.

GWEN STEFANI SURPRISED A LOT

OF TEACHERS AT A PLACE CALLED

HOME.

SHE PARTNERED UP WITH STARBUCKS

AND SHE ALL GOT LIKE $20 GIFT

CARDS.

THEIR BIG THING, GIVE GOOD.

THANK YOU, GWEN!

THANK YOU, STARBUCKS!

CHARLES: SO WAIT, SHE SHOWED UP

AT A SCHOOL?

A PLACE CALLED HOME IS LIKE

FOR UNDERPRIVILEGED YOUTH AND

THE PEOPLE WHO GOT THE STARBUCKS

CARD ARE THE PEOPLE WHO GO AND

VOLUNTEER TO HELP THESE KIDS.

CHARLES: SO SHE GAVE STARBUCKS

CARDS TO THE VOLUNTEERS?

GREAT.

EVERYONE LOVED IT.

SHE LOOKED GREAT DOING IT.

HOW DOES SHE LOOK?

DID SHE LOOK PRETTY?

GORGEOUS.

SHE'S IN THE CHRISTMAS SPIRIT.

CHARLES: UGLY SWEATER?

NO, SHE DIDN'T HAVE AN UGLY

SWEATER.

CHARLES: THIS IS THE ONE TIME

YOU CAN GET AWAY WITH UGLY

SWEATER.

YOU SHOULD DO IT.

ARE YOU DOING AN UGLY SWEATER

PARTY THIS YEAR?

CHARLES: I DON'T GET INVITED TO

PARTIES.

I DON'T GET INVITED TO UGLY

SWEATER PARTIES.

THEY JUST INVITE HIM TO A

SWEATER PARTY.

CHARLES: WHAT?

WEAR YOUR NORMAL SWEATER,

CHARLES.

[LAUGHTER]

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét