Thứ Năm, 2 tháng 2, 2017

Waching daily Feb 2 2017

what's up everyone my name is Ahmso and

welcome back too For Honor now small

difference from what I've been doing

lately is I'm gonna be doing the orders

this time

so in this case it wants me to do play

vs AI which is fine i'm going to skip

this one for now but then this one's

player vs AI and this was play versus

and so we're going to do an AI gameplay

we need to be renowned 250 up score

points on this one and that's when we

need to kill 15 Dominion matches which

is fine fairly easy

the 1i probably have trouble with his

performance five executions in a

Dominion match

I don't know how to do fucking

executions but that's here are there

let's continue and do some may I

Dominion meshes I thought this was AI oh

yeah is that ok ok so we exploit other

people

nice to continue where we left off ok so

I'm going to continue with this I'm

really quick that's not the same person

that's what i want w-w-w she really

enjoyed what is this passive rapidly

route what passes rapidly revive fallen

teammates are awesome

oh I like the iron lung a little bit

better to be honest yeah i like to be

able to run I gotta run away from people

so yeah that's a such as I guess we're

ready

oh they're waiting for me my bad we got

25 of these matches that have to do five

execution it looks like here we go here

we go guys this is actually one thing

I'm super glad that they're doing is

they're doing i guess i guess they are

dailies on when we start there we go go

go

that was a little weird and controller

plugged a little bit

so I guess so always shit we are I guess

winning like crazy

oh my boys down my boys down gotta get

enough gotta give up

we're getting close here we go here we

go out we got some got there you go out

you know camps like a shield likable

know ya got ok

shit with the left another person ok

I'll event long so i'll go go

don't get up oh shit I got you I got you

buddy here and there damage it can get

up

o our shit come on someone else ever get

up

yes like you down the boy oh boy oh yes

he is awesome

don't cheat i get up like a smart

him of matter where you come then

execution I don't know

ok oh he got me have it

Cabot fast there we go there we go

oh boy i'm going to get out of here get

here stroke you doing out here

oh no get out of here

aw dammit we get healed we gotta get

healed general waste lost shit get a

jump shifts

I don't know shit we go we go buddy

oh you have this can have this back you

get back here like a broken arm

there we go to capture my help

nice nice ok heal up

often awesome go back down trying to

take over see there we go that low of

doing stereo we got to we got a nice

victory is ours awesome over go through

results very good we want to shit

ok

oh we got this we got this cause I

haven't seen bullshit

nothing the beginning of the symbol for

awesome little trick ray I want to go

for B if they want bi-metal strip friend

I want to get those up get those points

lost you capture ok nice ok go's the boy

take that shit okay he's nicer are

fucking fat-ass correct it then that's

what got me good

I feel super bad about that i got rekt

by a bot okay you got this way

what's up here i want what is up here I

was just a quick rapture age

oh it's good to know ok we're capturing

again you capture donate ok i guess the

go to the middle against others look at

him but users easily directly i got it

there you go

oh my god that was awesome how the fuck

did I do that I think that was an

execution

how do you keep that my way buddy you

eat it

shit flick hope it's all I thought I had

an execution for a second i was the god

I'm clear about the square mouse always

you see what you see you must see you

coming down the ladder

let's go let's go let's go but you see I

gotta go after him go get my revenge and

especially to go of their uses up there

oh shit my teammates my buddy

shit no you do it

oh shit you capture ok she okay

survival's no you left us okay get back

here back here w she get back here cool

stop running away from me finally feel

this place you can just run them right

away from me will capture so days

there we go 925 your government i

keeping my own teammate visit

kill their heroes ok ok I think he's

going up to see you go to see all the

power here thinking oh yes oh shit going

to his shit shit shit there we go got

gifts all the guys gonna see if you

wanted to teach you gotta get we gotta

get him back here just get our you see

again so much fun we got speed to

capture so let's keep it going to try to

find where to go where to go but

somewhere up there's one there's one

voice boy WC very up our shit

there we go oh yeah nice nice my point

is dead

let's get them picking them up now he's

got a gun okay I'm those bloodthirsty

also has ok here we go then go straight

for seat

everyone's going to a I'm negotiate for

see them i'm pretty sure that's what

they're boys but yep that's what they're

going to be at all right come here boy

let's go let's go oh she got me you got

me through your heels

oh shit he got me have it

haha correct about a way how to start

this thing we got this we got there we

go get it get it

shit they're ago i got you i catching

some a nice ok best that's what down but

down likely to jump off this I can't

dammit

ok girls go in a circle

get back here get back here

I'm after anybody really matter you can

bet on your feet

oh not gonna happen never go oh no shit

the abbot he got me he needed me to have

it back seat looks like one of that one

other person is over there went over to

get there we go there we go there we go

oh nice nice

oh oh look at that we have love will be

okay we got that we got that with

everyone out drop a taste

oh I didn't clear the place you lost

just got their God cup

let's go buddy go Father just got me so

pay to pick up kicks off

oh hell yeah that's one way of doing it

some of the most o the back-to-back here

to graduate

got to got like okay my stamina stamina

boy

oh shit you got it you got it so I can't

jump down i want to jump down and jump

off of it so much easier

alright Lucy Lucy I got you I got a boy

i got this shit get up there are just

awesome awesome boy he left was going to

heal them up

ok it's ok we're good for good

we got this why we lost a all here now

okay don't know shit oh shit oh crap

double-teaming not cool

I get my stamina back down there we go i

get my stamina though shit

oh look at that taking off kicking off

oh the guys i do the super dangerous

least I need my stamina in my family to

capture so I've gotta because there we

go there we go i was select kill their

heroes

okay Ross stamina up where they're ours

a hero that with the heroes

c'mon is getting execution

there we go did get an execution but

it's okay it's okay i can do it up thing

oh I think my arrows in nice that it

that's it anyways thank you guys for

watching for honor if you guys enjoyed

this video hit that like button leave a

comment down below if you knew anything

just fart hit the subscribe button for

more content such as this and as always

out see you guys in the next one

For more infomation >> NOBUSHI #3 | FOR HONOR Gameplay Samurai - Nobushi Gameplay【FOR HONOR DOMINION】 - Duration: 14:03.

-------------------------------------------

Clemson Center for Geospatial Technologies Collaborates to Build Interactive 3D Campus Database - Duration: 3:41.

So the overall goal of the basemap is

to collect as much data

about campus as we possibly can and

using whatever technology at our

disposal to package that in a

way that is useful for students so a lot

of the data we can create in the center

on the computer you know you can get a

lot of good data online but a lot of the

data was just not there before so we had

to go out and get it. I would say one of

the big things was that we created a

database of geospatial information that

is open to any student staff faculty

researchers at Clemson and the general

public to use. They're free to take it and

use it in their own projects, modify it in

any way. And we were able to to create a

database just for Clemson's campus that serves as

a useful starting point for

other sorts of applications in a lot of

disciplines. So one of the major goals for

the project was to bring people together not

only us at the Center itself,

looking at coordination of different parts

of the project but also coordinating

with other units on campus, such as facilities

planning, the library, utilities, there's

been a huge need for many units looking

at a base core dataset, a

geographic data set that allows them to put

their own applications, their own data on

top of it. So we wanted this data to be

used by all these units by also trying to

bring them together and that's something

that we've seen growing and happening much

stronger after we delivered the first part

of the project. We created browser-based

applications that can be used by Clemson

community to find places around campus like

buildings, places to eat, parks,

bike racks, there are also mobile versions

available for those applications that

could be used by Clemson students

faculty or staff.

Other department helped us to build

idea of how to collect the 3d data and

how to create buildings with this kind of

data and it helps to like develop our

project. There are a lot of collaboration

that had happened after we presented our

projects like we collaborated with the

libraries on two projects, mapping the

historic campus and creating 3D Cooper.

Creating 3D Cooper library and

we are also collaborating with the

visualization department of CITI,

doing a virtual reality of Clemson

campus using Oculus Rift.

I mean it helps to give the Clemson

community to visualize the

the building of our campus and

it also can help to give a

visualized tour of all the

campus. It was a long summer. But you know

it was nice to be out in the sun and get to see

parts of campus that I've never seen before.

For more infomation >> Clemson Center for Geospatial Technologies Collaborates to Build Interactive 3D Campus Database - Duration: 3:41.

-------------------------------------------

31 Days of Yoga with Adriene! - Duration: 5:07.

Hello my friends! Kaitlyn here! And let's do some yoga!

Um, when did this become a fitness channel?

(INTRO MUSIC)

Okay! So we're not actually gonna be doing yoga on the channel today,

BUT I have been doing a lot of yoga recently and I wanted to talk about it's awesomeness!

So I've been a fan of yoga since college when I first tried it and found I loved it

because it combined two of things I valued and needed--flexibility and breathing exercises.

Now there's a whole lot more to yoga than flexibility and breathing exercises but that

is where I started for me.

But once out of college, I was pretty apprehensive about taking public classes because

First I didn't have any money because I hadn't found a job yet and then when I did

find a job, the classes were offered at really inconvenient times

and I'd have to travel at least 30 minutes to get to the closest studio...so it was just a bust.

BUT THEN!

In January of 2015, I stumbled across on the Internet Yoga with Adriene's 30 Day Yoga challenge.

Pretty self-explanatory: guided yoga videos on Youtube.

A new one uploaded everyday in January.

And I thought. What the heck? It's free. I can do it in my bedroom. Why not?

And so began my love affair with yoga and Adriene's presentation of it.

As of this past Tuesday, I've completed my 3rd 30 day Yoga "Challenge" with Adriene, and I'm feeling awesome.

Especially awesome because this is the first year that I actually did yoga every day.

In the past, I would skip a day here or there when I was feeling sore or sick or just too busy.

Essentially, it made a month long challenge take like 2 months. Ah!

But this time, I was like: What will happen if I just stick with it.

Even if that means doing yoga at 11 pm or when I'm super sore or just feeling awful.

And yes, it did make for days where I did not enjoy the yoga.

But it has absolutely made me stronger.

So here's what I love about Adriene's program and channel in general.

(And why I would recommend you check it out, do some yoga videos and maybe even try a 30 day challenge!)

First, it's an "exercise" program that'smore about being in tune with your body than "getting ripped."

Now that's not to say it's not challenging or unable to get you in shape because

I was sweating and shaking doing these videos!

It's because of the 2nd thing I love about this channel which is that Adriene emphasizes a mindfulness for

your body and your mind which is something that I unfortunately had not experienced in other yoga classes.

It's not about slamming into different poses and trying to fit the "mold"

but rather about seeing where your body's at and listening to it and seeing what it's telling you.

I didn't really listen to my body until watching her videos.

I would just get angry at myself for not being able to do what I thought my body should do.

I have really horrific memories of high school where I was tryingto learn choreography for show choir

and I would practice in my room and fail and so I would hit and smack, like violently my legs and my

arms and try to punish my body to kick it into gear because it wasn't doing what I wanted.

But that's not how that works. And that is not healthy.

Adriene's motto is "Find What Feels Good" which I thought was kind of corny at the very beginning

but, man! When you finally learn how to listen to your body,you realize how important that is and what it means.

I want exercising -- being physical -- to feel good!

And it absolutely can!

Third, I find such a sense of peace.

Adriene is very positive but in a realistic way.

"Everything is as it should be."

She not only has us focus on working the physical body but also the emotional, spiritual one.

She asks you to get kind of raw, kind of silly, kind of open.

Which I think works really well when you're doing it from the comfort and safety of your home.

And I've definitely left some of these workouts feeling completely zen or just with chills.

As someone with pretty overwhelming anxiety, this is a very rare and great occurrence for me.

Now, I know there are probably classes that have more of this mindset than I've previously experienced.

And now that I'm living in a new, bigger city, I need to go out there and find it!

But I love Adriene and her channel for the positivity, the light, the self-love that she's projecting into the world.

All of this is to say, you should go try some yoga. Whether you you want to lose weight

Or be more flexible. Or you suffer from anxiety like me!

You can try Adrienne's channel or one of the many other yoga channels that are out there on YouTube.

Or you could even try a real, live, in-person class! I don't care how you do it!

But I know that it was beneficial for me so I think it might be beneficial for you too.

So what do you guys think?

Do love yoga or watch Adriene?

Do you think yoga's only for girls.... (cuz it's not!)

Tell me all your yoga-related thoughts down in the comments!

Plus remember to like, favorite, share, and subscribe if this video made you smile!

See you guys on Tuesday!

(OUTRO MUSIC)

For more infomation >> 31 Days of Yoga with Adriene! - Duration: 5:07.

-------------------------------------------

DCA Rally: Joann Spotted Bear Speaks, No Green Card for Trump from Indigenous People - Duration: 6:27.

My dear relatives, before we say anything, we always thank the creator first.

My Lakota name is (unintelligible). My English name is Joann Spotted Bear.

I am an original descendant of the Little Big Horn, the Wounded Knee Massacre of 1890, World War I, World War II...

...1973 when the Lakota people went against the federal government, my father was a cop who walked off his job.

Today, I'm a national dignitary at the United Nations level.

I'm going to give you some real history about America.

The white man came here in 1492, that's the (unintelligible).

America was named after Amerigo Vespucci who died in 1512 of syphilis.

I kinda like that.

(laughter)

There's two court cases that describe America as not a country, Caha v. United States and Bond v. United States.

What every government across this country's not telling you, is in 1933 the United States went bankrupt...

...never ratified, never dialogued, never notified 564 federally recognized tribes, let alone North and South America and the world.

Donald Trump is an immigrant without a green card from all the indigenous people around the world.

For more infomation >> DCA Rally: Joann Spotted Bear Speaks, No Green Card for Trump from Indigenous People - Duration: 6:27.

-------------------------------------------

Quizzes - Reset Quiz Attempts for Learners - Instructor - Duration: 0:49.

For more infomation >> Quizzes - Reset Quiz Attempts for Learners - Instructor - Duration: 0:49.

-------------------------------------------

Trump again urges McConnell to 'go nuclear' if needed for Supreme Court pick - Duration: 1:34.

Trump again urges McConnell to 'go nuclear' if needed for Supreme Court pick.

By GABBY MORRONGIELLO.

President Trump directed Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., on Wednesday to employ

the nuclear option to confirm his Supreme Court nominee if Democrats try to stall the

process.

"If we end up with that gridlock, I would say if you can, Mitch, go nuclear," Trump

said Wednesday when asked Democrats' strategy to filibuster his nominee, Judge Neil Gorsuch.

Trump's request comes less than 24 hours after he named Gorsuch as his choice to replace

the late Justice Atonin Scalia on the Supreme Court bench.

Several Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., immediately

vowed to block the nominee from receiving confirmation without 60 votes.

Trump had previously told Fox News' Sean Hannity in an interview last month that he would advise

Senate Republicans to use the nuclear option, but his latest comments come after McConnell

seemed reluctant to do so.

"That's not a presidential decision.

That's a Senate decision," McConnell had told Politico after Trump's comments in late January.

For more infomation >> Trump again urges McConnell to 'go nuclear' if needed for Supreme Court pick - Duration: 1:34.

-------------------------------------------

Groups & Discussions Tools - Use Private Discussions for Journaling - Instructor - Duration: 3:27.

For more infomation >> Groups & Discussions Tools - Use Private Discussions for Journaling - Instructor - Duration: 3:27.

-------------------------------------------

GRWM for a basketball game!! - Duration: 3:23.

Btw I did out on deoderant, the camera wasnt filming. And the store i got the chapstick at was Walmart.

For more infomation >> GRWM for a basketball game!! - Duration: 3:23.

-------------------------------------------

Engaging with Experts on Trending Topics: Realizing the Vision for Future Victim Services - Duration: 50:43.

Good afternoon and good morning to those of you

joining us in the Western U.S.

My name is Joye Frost and I'm the director of the Office for

Victims of Crime here at the Office of Justice Programs.

And I'm one of the many architects of the Vision 21:

Transforming Victim Services Strategic Initiative.

If you don't know much about Vision 21, I would encourage you

to go to ovc.gov and just put Vision 21 in the search engine.

And before I start my remarks, I want to thank the OVC

Training and Technical Assistance Center, Shelby

Crawford from OVC, and Juan Sutton [phonetic] from the

Office of Justice Programs for their efforts

to make this webinar happen.

So I want to start by concisely defining what Vision 21 is.

It's really an OVC initiative to work closely with victims,

survivors, service providers in the traditional victim

assistance field, as well as allied practitioners, to chart

out the strategy for reaching and serving every crime

victim in the 21st century.

And together we identified so many issues - probably not

surprising to those of you who are listening in:

Lack of capacity that was strongly related to underfunding

of our vital victim services.

(But thankfully Congress has addressed this

in the last two fiscal years.)

Lack of technology to ease access for many victims to

needed information and services as well as to reduce the

administrative burden on our practitioners.

We also identified that we really had to take a step

back and rethink the issue of who is the prime victim, and

expand our table, which is a pretty big table as it is, but

to make it even bigger to ensure a place for crime victims and

their leaders and advocates from marginalized and

disenfranchised populations.

We needed to address the new types of emerging crime and the

challenges they present and the important role that crime

victims must play, and crime victim advocates must play, not

just in the immediate aftermath of crimes, but ensuring that

our voices, all of our voices, are heard as our

communities, states, and country join together to reform our

criminal and juvenile systems, which is a pivotal piece of

reshaping our communities into havens of peace, safety, and

economic security for each and every one of us.

Interestingly enough, what we learned within months of

starting our Vision 21 Initiative is that we really

couldn't answer many or most of the questions

that we started out with.

And we couldn't answer them because there was an immense

lack of data and research to guide our efforts, or at least

access to that vital data and research.

So it is no mistake that the very first chapter in the

Vision 21 report addresses this gap.

At that time we did not have enough comprehensive and

meaningful victimization data or information on pragmatic,

inexpensive ways to conduct program evaluation, or

evidence-based practices to meet the myriad needs of an

increasingly diverse population of victims.

Well, I'm standing here almost 5 years later, and I have to say

we still don't have all that we need, but we have made

great progress to report today.

One of the issues that we identified in that first chapter

was the need for translation and communication between

researchers and practitioners and not, I

will add, one way communication.

OVC for the first time has a visiting fellowship program

that addresses this issue.

So we have brought on a joint OVC-Bureau

of Justice Statistics fellow.

So it's my privilege today to introduce Heather Warnken, who

is the first OVC-BJS fellow in the first-ever position designed

to improve the use, dissemination, and, very

importantly, translation of statistical data and social

science research for the Crime Victim Assistance Bill.

Before joining DOJ, Heather spent 5 years as a legal policy

associate at the Warren Institute on Law and Social

Policy at the University of California

Berkeley School of Law.

While there, she led many multidisciplinary projects

utilizing research and collaborative partnerships to

bridge the gap between research, policy, and practice, including

two statewide assessments on how to improve access to victim

services and compensation for underserved victims of crime.

She also worked at the San Francisco Juvenile Probation

Department to develop policies and procedures to improve

outcomes for youth, advance recommendations of the

congressionally chartered Commission on Education,

Equity, and Excellence, and as a research partner to Californians

for Safety and Justice.

She served as a law clerk to the Honorable Joseph F. Murphy, Jr.,

Court of Appeals of Maryland, and has provided pro bono legal

services in domestic violence and child welfare matters.

I actually could go on and on, but I think I will conclude with

the fact that she holds an LL.M. from UC Berkeley School of Law,

a J.D. cum laude with pro bono distinction from Suffolk

University Law School, and a B.A. with honors

from Johns Hopkins University.

I think there is probably no more ideal person to fill this

first position and really set the benchmarks

for those who will follow.

Heather has done incredible work in her slightly over 8 months

here at OVC and BJS, and I know you will find her overview of

some very important initiatives to be both

thought-provoking and engaging.

Heather, thank you for your efforts and for

leading this discussion today.

[applause]

Thank you so much, Joye, and good afternoon, everyone.

It's really an honor to be here with you.

So even in this unprecedented era of criminal justice reform

where historic bipartisan consensus around the need to

make data-driven decisions with our public safety dollars is on

the radar of policymakers, practitioners, the media, and

even the President of the United States, we are in many ways

still just scratching the surface on understanding an

essential piece to any discussion on public safety, the

persistent lack of access to services, healing, and recovery

for far too many victims of crime.

The voices of victims and those on the frontlines serving them

have been absent or seen a limited role, or

under-representative role, in the

media and policymaking table.

Even in the advent of historic victories achieved during the

Crime Victims' Rights Movement decades ago, the needs of

victims have often been oversimplified and codified with

a narrow focus on rights within the justice system or

harsh sentencing policies.

This departure from the more holistic and diverse goals of

the grassroots movement for survivors has been amplified by

another reality that Vision 21 made clear, that those

victories, hard-fought and secured on behalf of all

victims, have too often been little more than promises on

paper or unfunded mandates disconnected from the lived

experiences of many attempting to overcome their trauma

alone in the aftermath of crime.

As a survivor of violent crime myself, I have experienced this

disconnect firsthand where my experience of a prompt,

compassionate response from law enforcement that never

questioned my status as a victim nor impeded my desire to report,

of knowing and understanding my rights in the justice process,

of having access to an advocate to help me navigate it, to

health insurance and a range of other options for formal and

informal support to meet my physical, emotional, and

financial needs - all of that culturally appropriate and

effective enough to help get me back on my feet.

The reality is this experience has looked nothing like the

experience of hundreds of survivors I've had the privilege

of connecting with around the Nation throughout

the course of this work.

It is hard for me to fathom knowing that, even with that

range of resources, healing can be an uphill climb.

This disconnect is affirmed by the data.

My experience was the exception, not the rule.

Yet as we convene here today, we also do so in a powerful moment

of optimism guided by Vision 21, unprecedented resources, and a

growing set of tools to use them effectively, the implications

of which I'll discuss today.

However, borrowing from the words of Dr. King, we also know

that change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability.

Much like greater awareness of the existence of victim services

is not a panacea for success or equity in this field, neither in

itself is a historic increase in funding.

Harnessing these dollars effectively, driven by data

relevant and translatable to all corners of this field, requires

the continuous recognition that, much like victims, victim

services providers are not a monolithic group.

Whether measured by the victims they serve or the conditions in

which they serve them, their perspectives vary tremendously.

Their experiences are shaped daily by the role that race,

gender, sexual orientation, disability, and poverty play in

creating divergent challenges and divergent realities for

victims as in so many aspects of life.

It will require bridging the divide across researchers and

practitioners and across disciplines long siloed yet

indispensable to our success, expanding the tent of the field

as we know it to include new strategies to reach

the unseen and the unserved.

Thanks to Vision 21 and Joye's leadership,

we are up for that challenge.

So let's dive in.

So Vision 21 as the first major assessment of the field in 15

years, as Joye mentioned, serves as a comprehensive blueprint for

the ways in which reality has not kept pace with the

rights and services for all victims that we've committed

to over the past 30 years.

Notwithstanding the dearth of data we have to inform this

field, we know through the National Crime Victimization

Survey that only 9 percent of victims of serious violence

access services from a victim service agency.

And this already low number plummets to 4 percent when the

crime is unreported, approximately half.

We also know that often those most likely to experience crime

are often the least likely to access support.

These survivors are likely to be young, low income, and of color.

In fact, the NCVS found that only 8 percent of juvenile

victims receive services compared

to 13 percent of those 35 to 49.

We also know this varies tremendously across various

crime types, with about 22 percent of rape and sexual

assault victims and about 21 percent of DV

[domestic violence] victims reporting receiving services

compared to only 8 percent of aggravated and simple assault;

5 percent of males compared to 14 percent of females.

We also know that victimizations reported to the police are far

more likely to get services than those not reported, making the

many complex barriers to reporting, including the

relationship that victims have, and their communities have, with

law enforcement incredibly important.

Moreover, a recent study from the Injury Prevention Research

Center at the University of Iowa, using NCVS data published

in just July of this year, found that reporting victimization is

associated with fewer future victimizations, underscoring the

relationship of reporting not only to accessing service but

to crime prevention overall.

So as Joye mentioned, Vision 21 highlighted that the current

research and statistical infrastructure has not kept pace

with the service infrastructure built over the last 20 years.

OVC has coupled this vision of moving the field toward a future

where evidence based, data-driven practice is the

norm, with a number of bold investments designed to make

that possible, including bringing its existing

collaborations with its sister agencies here at the Office of

Justice Programs to the next level.

So though my focus today will be on those collaborations with the

Bureau of Justice Statistics, I do want to note that OVC has

also been working closely with the National Institute of

Justice, including efforts to better understand the financial

cost of victimization, the experiences of at-risk groups,

a study on the national victimization of tribal youth,

restorative justice programs, and the incredibly important

overlap between victims and those who commit harm.

NIJ itself is also investing in a range of activities to create

better linkages in its portfolio and to bridge the gap, including

its dissemination series "Research for the Real World."

So why are these investments so crucial right now?

Demographic shifts within the population, globalization, and

evolving crime types such as trafficking, cyber, and

environmental crime demand new strategies from the field.

But along with Vision 21, Congress has also bestowed the

potential to rise to this challenge, nearly quadrupling

Victims of Crime Act funding in the past two fiscal years,

a level that will continue with approximately $2.578 billion

flowing to the states in the next fiscal year.

This formula grant fund program already supports more than 4,000

different victim assistance programs annually through

subgrants to local public agencies and providers.

And this year we'll come hand-in-hand with a new rule

interpreting the use and administration of these funds

years in the making and released just this August 8th.

This rule provides clarity and greater flexibility to state

administering agencies to support a continuum of services

that have often been scarce or unavailable to victims in the

past, including comprehensive legal assistance, transitional

housing, expanded coverage of relocation expenses, and the

use of these funds for forensic interviews and medical exams.

And perhaps one of the biggest sea changes of all, it removed

language that restricted the use of this funding to support

services to victims currently and formerly incarcerated in

detention and correctional facilities.

Together these create unprecedented opportunities for

training, for delineation of roles and

evidence-based decisionmaking.

But to realize that vision, we must place our data collection

efforts in timely policy and practical context of a field

truly in transition, measuring what is and what will be rather

than what has always been.

This is what bridging the divide is all about.

As described in the Vision 21 report, "One of the principal

challenges in advancing research to improve crime victim services

is the lack of communication and collaboration among

researchers and practitioners.

Practitioners are often unaware of information critical to their

work, and even when they are aware, they may be unable to

interpret or apply the findings in appropriate context,

especially those not presented in a straightforward,

understandable way.

Across many fields research often lacks a clear explanation

of its implications for practice nor the tools to translate its

relevance to the locally driven challenges that overwhelmed

practitioners often face."

In furtherance of OVC's commitment to bridging the

longstanding and seemingly intractable translation gap

between researchers and practitioners, in collaboration

with BJS as Joye mentioned, it launched the first-ever in-house

position to specifically address it.

This comes hand-in-hand with two other major efforts, including

launching this year a new national resource center, one

for research and evaluation and one focused on underserved

communities, to help further bridge this gap for state

administering agencies that we are so excited about.

Threading through all of these bridging-the-gap efforts and why

this concept has eluded so many fields for so long is that at

the end of the day this is a process, and it's not formulaic.

It's about the hard, long-term work of finding the sweet spot,

the sweet spot where rigorous scientific method meets the

messiness and tremendous diversity of the real life that

it seeks to measure, where data-driven and reality-driven

can actually be one and the same.

So in that spirit I'm going to take off this wonky hat for a

minute to give you some examples of what that amorphous

concept actually means to me.

Bridging the gap is not just about better dissemination and

translation of existing data.

Equally important, if not more so, is putting practitioners in

impacted communities at the design and decisionmaking table

of what information gets collected and why, and

continuing to engage throughout the process those closest to and

most impacted by the information that we seek.

It means thinking about translation and dissemination on

the front end of these activities, not 5 years down the

line when a project concludes with a dense report tied in a

bow, the type too often that collects dust on a shelf, in an

inbox, or simply arrives too late to be relevant.

Take OVC's Supporting Male Survivors of Violence

Initiative, for example.

The last webcast in this Vision 21 series actually featured some

of the rock stars leading that work nationally, and over 1,000

registered nationwide, hungry for the information that these

sites and these experts had to share.

This speaks to the need for information, learning, and

connection on these issues now, especially in serving young

males of color, a population so overrepresented in

victimization and so underrepresented in the

literature and in access to services.

We can't wait 5 years down the line to share the groundbreaking

learning that's going to come out of these 12 demonstration

sites throughout the country.

How do we build the infrastructure to make sure that

dissemination and translation and access to these moves

forward, happens in real time?

This also means engaging new audiences and new stakeholders,

such as the collaboration with the Federal Interagency Reentry

Council that OVC has recently engaged in, not only at such a

timely and historic moment when the restriction of funds for

programs serving currently or formerly incarcerated survivors

is now removed, but also at a moment when we can actually

leverage the current momentum of such a diverse group of

agencies, one considered one of the most successful

collaborations to emerge from the Federal Government, to

operate with the recognition that an astounding number of

those entering the criminal and juvenile justice system and

reentering society on the back end have themselves been victims

of crime - often whose trauma has gone unaddressed - and to

work together to actually do something about it.

Using the hook of National Crime Victims' Rights Week, which has

long been commemorated in this country, and the first-ever

National Reentry Week, which was commemorated by President Obama

for the first time this year, and a blog format that was more

accessible potentially than a dense report, I teamed up with

my friend and colleague Daryl Atkinson, DOJ's first-ever

"second chance" fellow, to co-author a piece across these

silos, elevating existing data to demonstrate that though only

a week separates these observances on the calendar, the

gulf of public perception - who society envisions as a

victim and a perpetrator of crime - is much wider, often to

the detriment of getting people the help they need.

We called for a unification of the efforts to develop a body

of knowledge that's already happening in both spaces to

create one body of knowledge capable of helping

policymakers and the public break down false distinctions

in an overlapping world.

The inspiring results to me exemplify the essence of

bridge-building, for which there is often no blueprint.

Rather, it's about forging ahead with ideas that never would

have been possible until everyone came into the room.

So, stepping back and looking at some of the limitations of our

existing data, there are so many current sources of information

so relevant to the victim assistance field, but when taken

alone they can feel very limiting.

This includes the Uniform Crime Report, which although it

provides valuable information for more than 18,000 law

enforcement agencies in this country and useful data about

yearly trends, it does not capture what we think of as the

dark figure of crime, that which is unreported and that

that we know is one of our greatest

corollaries to the underserved.

The National Crime Victimization Survey, the annual collection

from a nationally representative sample of nearly 160,000 people,

does, making it such a key source of information

since its inception in 1972.

But though the NCVS elicits information on many relevant

variables for the victim assistance field, including

victimization that goes under the radar of law enforcement,

currently it is also limited in a number of ways, including not

collecting information on victimization of children

younger than 12, not collecting information on certain crime

types such as drunk driving and homicide, and not reflecting the

experience of some of our most vulnerable victims, including

those who are homeless, transient, or experiencing

victimization in institutional or correctional settings.

This is such important context for appreciating the

value to the field that BJS's expanded

victimization unit will bring.

Vision 21 goals were already central to BJS's mission of

providing information of critical importance to federal,

state, and local policymakers and their efforts toward a more

integrated set of data that's better aligned to answer

questions within the field.

One component of this effort to improve data quality and utility

is a large-scale redesign and modernization of the NCVS,

adding key questions surrounding whether victims receive services

and, of those who do, what type of assistance they received.

Also significant, these questions - many of which will

be added in an ask-all manner - will create a denominator.

So rather than just being answered by victims through an

incident report, we will be able to compare the experiences and

perceptions of victims who self-report to those who do not.

This also includes the NCVS subnational program, delivering

the ability to couple victimization statistics and

other sources of information to better understand patterns of

risk, reporting, and resource allocation at the local level.

The lack of state and local-level data has long been a

barrier to use of the NCVS by practitioners in the field.

So this is a really big deal to have this breakdown.

You can see from this teaser some of the early results of

just how meaningful this deeper, granular level analysis can be.

I mean, Texas, wow: Let's start to understand why the NCVS says

you're so far ahead of the curve.

We often think about this data through victims' experiences and

through victims' lenses.

We think about victims' pathways to services and, therefore, our

data collection efforts have tended to

understandably focus on victims.

But data from providers is equally important, providing

another critical vantage point.

What is the demand for services?

Do service providers have the staffing, the funding, the

training, and the other resources

to actually be effective?

That is why, catching up with two decades of program

development from OVC and the Office of Violence against Women

to enhance the Nation's capacity to assist victims, BJS has also

launched the Victim Services Research Program to collect and

analyze new data from the diverse

entities that serve victims.

This includes a collaboration between BJS and the National

Center for Health Statistics to develop a national survey of

hospital-based victim services to understand the range of

services available at such a critical point of access and one

that to date we've known very little about.

BJS has also added questions about victim services to

existing surveys of law enforcement agencies and

prosecutor's offices and together all of these efforts

will offer the most comprehensive picture of victim

service provision to date.

Another brand-new effort at the cornerstone of all of this is

the National Census of Victim Service Providers.

You can see the diverse expertise of the project team

selected by a competitive solicitation by BJS and OVC

starting in the fall of 2012.

Driven by input from the field, the project team has worked with

both an expert panel and a project input committee of

diverse representation, first to assist in drafting an effective

survey instrument and to answer follow-up questions on issues of

importance and evolution to the field, and also to assist in

identifying a diverse sample for testing.

So what will this census tell us?

How many of what kinds of providers there are or what

types of services are available, what are the average budgets for

these programs, and what are their sources of funding.

Notwithstanding this process that has included ongoing

engagement with the field, finding that sweet spot and

defining what we actually mean when we say the victim services

field across such a diverse landscape has remained

challenging, especially during this period of

unprecedented growth and change.

Lists of existing providers are often incomplete,

out-of-date, and missing items necessary

to draw a representative sample.

The many topics and items of interest to victim assistance

also presents a very challenging balancing act.

If too many questions are included on a survey, it could

present a burden on respondents leading to low response rates

that are not generalizable and not conducive to the busy lives

of practitioners in the field.

Furthermore, informal service providers may not have the

staffing or capacity to record key information, but they are no

less important in this landscape, especially in

many underserved communities.

So, addressing these challenges: In order to do that, the project

shifted to implementation in two phases.

Phase one, the census phase - that will survey the complete

roster of approximately 31,000 entities nationally.

It will refine this roster, produce a clear picture of who

is identifying as a VSP throughout the country, using

basic characteristics of the organizations at a high level.

Then, phase two: moving to the more detailed survey.

This will use information gathered from phase one to

hopefully create a nationally representative sample of

VSPs and engage them in a more detailed way.

So creating this complete picture obviously means asking

the right questions, but it also means continuing to inspire and

promote the consistency in their answers.

And part of what that entails is the hard work of understanding

the subcultures and subcommunities within the field,

a field spanning so many contexts and professions.

So one area that jumped out immediately was law

enforcement-based victim services, especially given the

fervor currently around our national conversation on

policing and how infrequently the relevance of this to

crime-victim assistance is discussed.

The pilot findings of the NCVSP also indicated there seemed to

be some inconsistency or misinterpretation on the part of

law enforcement respondents, some of them answering questions

in how staffing and resources in their organizations were

allocated when it came to victims.

For example, some law enforcement agencies, assuming

that given that serving victims is such an integral part of what

they do, seemed to be answering questions about their entire

budget or their entire staff capacity, which is such a

different thing than having dedicated victim advocates

focused on serving victims.

So this is a big deal, and being caught in the pilot phase

allowed for us to do more engagement and outreach to

that community of practitioners.

This inspired engagement with key bodies such as the

International Association of Chiefs of Police Victim Services

Committee and efforts to better understand the current continuum

of law enforcement-based victim services, and a site visit to

one such program that is considered the gold standard of

robust law enforcement integrated assistance - a police

department that features on-staff 24/7 licensed clinical

social workers with specialized training in trauma to meet the

needs of victims, the Austin Police Department, which stands

in contrast to what anecdote has told us is definitely

the exception and not the rule.

This also involved working with my colleagues at BJS to look

across other sources of data that may be highly relevant but

less frequently recognized as so important

to the victim assistance field.

That included LEMAS, the Law Enforcement Management and

Administrative Statistics, which is a survey that BJ puts out

that is responded to by all agencies in the entire country

of a hundred sworn officers or more and a nationally

representative sample of those less than a hundred.

And so what did we find?

So, LEMAS was sitting there all along putting numbers behind

something the field has so frequently pointed

to anecdote to say is a gap.

LEMAS - buried in this survey - asks a specific question of all

agencies about their capacity for victim assistance and asks

agencies to put themselves in one of five categories.

The gold star category is a specialized unit within the

department with full time personnel dedicated to victim

assistance; in other words, what I saw in Austin.

The next category, a specialized unit with part-time personnel

- you can see what a minority those agencies were with only

9 percent in the first and 4 percent in the second.

The third category - maybe they didn't have a specialized unit,

but the agency at least had dedicated personnel focused

on serving victims, 12 percent.

The following category, no dedicated personnel but the

agency at least had related policies, procedures, or

training focused on victim assistance, 54 percent.

Now, in 2013 when this data, the latest LEMAS, was collected, I

would have assumed - given the incredible advancements in the

field, especially through laws and policies that require law

enforcement to play a meaningful role in victim assistance,

sometimes even through state constitutional amendments that

give law enforcement a role in handing out information or

meaningfully connecting victims with services - I would

have thought that it was practically illegal for a law

enforcement agency to put itself past category

four at this point in time.

Yet 20 percent of law enforcement agencies in this

country were putting themselves in category five.

They were not formally addressing

victim assistance at all.

BJS, in an NCVS local companion study this fall, is exploring a

deeper set of questions on these issues, addressing perceptions

of police, focusing heavily on concepts of procedural

justice and legitimacy.

This will be another key tool in a comprehensive picture of

community wellbeing that goes beyond

just factors of violent crime.

So looking at the pilot results, which was conducted from

August 2015 to January 2016 to a roster of about 700 VSPs, a

report with all pilot results is currently in progress and

forthcoming to the field.

But overall this process affirmed the importance of

beginning this step with a high-level census in order to

move toward that more detailed step.

You can see the distribution of participating

entities throughout the field.

The pilot and full census will also break down with much

greater granularity the types of providers within these broad

categories of government and nonprofit to better understand

the challenges that different entities face.

So, for which crime types did victims seek services?

Most VSPs saw a broad range of victims in the

past calendar or fiscal year.

More than 70 percent of victims reported that their services

were sought for eight or more different crime types.

However, government-based VSPs tended to see a more diverse

group of victims than nonprofit or faith-based.

What does it mean for the field that a government-based entity

might see a greater range of crime types than a nonprofit,

especially given the limitations of access to government-based

services for certain groups such as those less likely

to report their victimization?

What does this mean for victims of limited means such as those

at or below the federal poverty line who see more than double

the rate of violent victimization as persons in high

income households, who may be more greatly impacted by

limited points of access?

What would it take to grow the range of community-based

programs designed to meet a broader

range of victim centered needs?

In general, the majority of VSPs reported relatively small paid

staff sizes, but staff sizes differed for nonprofit or

faith-based entities compared to those based in the government.

Thirty-six percent of government-based

VSPs reported turnover in staff.

This was in contrast to the 55 percent of nonprofit or

faith-based entities that reported the same.

Nonprofit or faith-based entities were also far more

likely to use volunteers, once again putting data behind

something often cited as anecdote.

How about concerns?

Here you can see across a broad range of issues that to date

we've had no data to support.

You can see high levels of concern.

But notably and perhaps unsurprisingly you can see a

greater level of concern on these issues from

nonprofit or faith based VSPs.

This was true for staff retention, the burden of grant

reporting, and access to technology.

But it was especially true for funding received in the past

year and the predictability of future funding.

This is why we need you.

Providers and policymakers throughout the country

can help by spreading the word.

You can tune in to upcoming webinars to learn more about

this process, including September 28th,

October 13th, and November 7th.

And I encourage you to check out the

project website to learn more.

You can also share the survey link as widely as possible.

This is not a survey that can only go to those who

are on that roster of 31,000.

Critically important, this can be administered to entities

that are not on the radar thus far, that were less likely to be

on a list, especially those entities that haven't in the

past received government funding.

The full survey will launch in October and it's imperative that

we have as diverse representation as possible to

help bring this picture to life, the full picture to life.

So as Vision 21 noted, VOCA is largely silent on the issue of

prevention: research, program evaluation, the use of

technology, and the need for collaborative and

multijurisdictional responses to victims, and the capacity of

jurisdictions to provide increasingly

complex and long-term support.

According to Vision 21, "the field will continue to push for

a larger role in primary prevention."

Now, the new VOCA rule will help address some of this, but

especially in order to effectively plug in to the

national movement around criminal justice reinvestment

taking place, where data-driven prevention is the cornerstone,

we must support the victim assistance

field in connecting these dots.

Connecting the dots with proven strategies from the public

health field such as Cure Violence, Healing Hurt

People, and a robust set of other hospital-based

interventions and models, many of which are at the forefront

currently of OVC's 12 demonstration sites in the

Supporting Male Survivors of Violence Initiative.

This connection with public health is especially imperative

as increasing data emerges on the role of trauma and the

stakes of overreliance on justice system-based strategies

that may not be effective or realistic

for all victims of crime.

More and more research is building on the groundbreaking

Adverse Childhood Experience Study, or ACES, which was a

study carried out by CDC and Kaiser Permanente of over 17,000

adults, one of the largest investigations ever to make the

link empirically between child trauma and adult problems

including future violence.

As also stated in Vision 21, notwithstanding all of that

progress, "American society has yet to embrace the causal

relationship between childhood victimization and later criminal

behavior or repeat victimization."

We also must continuously relentlessly place data,

especially emerging data, in context to guard against its

misuse and misinterpretation.

And last, on this definitely not exhaustive list of persistent

challenges but one that I will mention today, is the importance

of combining this national level of data that's being created and

that currently exists with local level

data, that that will remain key.

The NCVS national program and these two new surveys will be an

amazing contribution to the field and to fill the

information gap, but they'll never replace state and locally

driven efforts to collect data that speaks directly to the

challenges that that individual jurisdiction may face.

So in conclusion, once again this is why we need all of you,

all of you throughout the country.

Currently I have the profound honor of serving you here as

both a translator and a conduit of information across divisions.

That is truly the best that I can be, a conduit of your

voices, and I want you to know that I'm always here to listen,

that my colleagues are always here to listen.

As we sit amidst this optimism in this historic moment and at

the precipice of monumental work that is still to come, the

urgent need for a trauma informed, data-driven paradigm

for victim services has never been more clear.

Victims will continue to have unique paths to justice and

healing, their own unique conceptualizations of what all

of that means, their own unique set of needs.

But this vision will continue to recognize a unifying common

denominator, one that builds this bridge: that victims of all

backgrounds and circumstances share a common need to feel safe

and to rebuild their lives, and that there are courageous

service providers all throughout this country that are

making that possible every day.

If improving the use, dissemination, and translation

of data and research still sounds wonky, I don't blame you,

but I do hope that I've communicated to you today

something very important, the premise upon which this is

built, the premise upon which OVC and BJS have made these

commitments to realizing a new vision for this field: that good

ideas, innovation, and policy victories are only worth their

salt in the trenches of human dignity; that the

practitioners and survivors who live in these trenches, they are

the heart of this work; that data-driven anything means

nothing if not grounded in the world that we live in; and that

we can do so much better than we do now.

Thank you.

[applause]

And I know we'd be so happy to take your questions, either

those in the room or those who are tuned in nationally who can

email their questions to the OVC TTAC web that is currently

up on the slide right now.

[pause]

Any questions?

[pause]

Do you know if in the last 10 years there are statistics that

show that victimization is being reported

more than it was 10 years ago?

No.

We don't have - or we have definitive data that speaks to

that, and unfortunately it's remained flat that the reporting

rates are still incredibly low.

This may not be a fair question, but that's okay, Heather.

Okay.

We hear so much and much of this is from the media and of course

it's always oversimplified, but it talks about rising rates of

violence in certain urban cities or urban communities, but it

talks about a lower level of crimes overall

since the eighties, for example.

I'm not completely convinced of that, and I have shared that

with both NIJ and BJS because I think the nature of crime is

changing so much and so much of crime and victimization is not

being captured by any instrument.

I just wondered about your thoughts about that.

Yeah.

That's a great question and I think it speaks directly to the

need of granularity in our victimization data because when

we oversimplify, we miss those disparities, exactly the

ones that you're speaking to.

It's also, I think, directly on point to this issue of context,

context, context because the NCVS, for example, and some

other sources of data in recent years have potentially been

demonstrating a leveling out of certain disparities in

victimization, for example, across certain racial groups,

but there are a lot of different factors

that could be influencing that.

And so thinking about not just what the data says but how it's

being collected and who it's being collected from,

I think remains so important.

So again, like I spoke about earlier with the NCVS being a

household-driven survey, who especially in an era of

over-incarceration might not be participating in a

household-driven survey because of transient or

justice system involvement?

So I think there are no clear answers to that question, but I

think it's part of why bridging the gap so that these points

about changes, about trends that we run with in public policy,

are really appreciated for the context.

Hi.

I have two questions.

The first is a multipart one so I guess I'll ask it and

then you can answer and then you'll answer...ok.

So the first one is, you mentioned that reporting

victimization resulted in a reduction

of future victimization.

Could you explain why?

Is it because victims have some sort of empowerment to leave

dangerous situations or is it that there's evidence that the

system actually works, that perpetuators are arrested,

tried, and then put away?

So, I think that's part of also a theme that we've been talking

about, that there's only so much that national-level

statistical data can tell us.

And so that study, which actually just came out last

month, and I am happy to email to you in case it'd be helpful

to read through some of the conclusions that the author

might have drawn, that study was based on

national-level statistical data.

So I think we need to overlay that quantitative picture with a

more deeper qualitative analysis that I think would cover

across a range of many factors.

You know there are many factors why victims do or don't

report and many factors that drive their satisfaction and

maybe their safety and stability after they do.

So based on statistical data we can't answer that completely.

And my second question is, of the 31,000 victim service

providers, do you know how many of them are tribally based?

Not so far, and that's one of the reasons that having the

census, the first one ever, will be

such an important step forward.

Agencies will be able to designate whether or not they

are a tribal VSP, so having that number and then being able to

couple it with what we know about victimization in those

areas will be a major way to understand that picture.

Okay.

If we've got no further questions, I think we're going

to wrap up for today, and I just want to thank everyone so much,

those here in the room and those who have joined us throughout

the country, and I look forward to engaging

with you moving forward.

[applause]

I'm just going to bring up Joye for some closing remarks.

Well actually, my closing remark is to once again thank Heather

for such a great presentation, and she shared her contact

information with you and I strongly urge

you to follow up with Heather.

She's just amazing, amazingly helpful to us in OVC, and I know

she would be the same with all of you in the field.

And she actually loves going out in the field because that really

is where the change happens.

So I want to thank everybody that listened in today for the

work that you do on a daily basis and taking time out of

your very busy day to join us.

So thank you, and this concludes this webinar and we

hope you join us for many more.

Thanks.

[applause]

For more infomation >> Engaging with Experts on Trending Topics: Realizing the Vision for Future Victim Services - Duration: 50:43.

-------------------------------------------

GTA SA PC Mod Menu Showcase! - Duration: 11:43.

For more infomation >> GTA SA PC Mod Menu Showcase! - Duration: 11:43.

-------------------------------------------

How to Activate a Wireless Device Online – AT&T Premier - Duration: 2:51.

AT&T Premier

Do you want to activate the new wireless device you received

after you requested a device upgrade

or placed a port or transfer order?

Let us show you how easy it is to activate a wireless device

online with Premier.

Activate your wireless device online if the new device is for

an existing wireless number.

Before you begin,

transfer your photos, videos and contacts from your

current device to your new device.

This is important because after you activate the new device,

you won't be able to retrieve information from your old one.

If you need help, use the AT&T Mobile Transfer app at

att.com/shop/apps/mobiletransfer

which works for most phones.

Don't put the SIM card from your old device in the

new device, since this can cause problems.

First we'll show you how to find your IMEI number

and SIM (or ICCID) card number on your new device.

You'll need these numbers later.

You can find the IMEI number and SIM card number on the

papers shipped with your new device.

or you can get this information from the new device itself.

If your new device is an Apple product,

tap "Settings," then "General," and then "About."

The IMEI and SIM card numbers appear onscreen.

Other device types may have a menu option that provides the

IMEI and SIM card numbers.

For details, consult your owner's manual.

If your new device doesn't have a menu option for viewing this

information, also refer to the owner's manual.

If you can't find the IMEI or SIM card number using any of

these methods, remove the back cover of the device

and remove the battery.

You'll find the 15-digit IMEI number printed on a

white sticker.

While the battery is still out, carefully remove the SIM card

from the device.

Notice the 19 or 20-digit number on the front of the

SIM card.

If you removed the battery and SIM card, replace them now

and turn on your device.

Now we're ready to activate your new device.

The confirmation email you received when you placed

the order for your new device contains a link to the

online activation process.

If you can't find the confirmation email,

you can also get to the online activation process from the

Premier home page.

From the "I want to" list, select "Activate device"

and click Go.

Then follow the instructions to activate your device.

When you're done, test the device.

Make sure the device is fully charged and then place a call.

If the call is successful, your device is active!

If the call wasn't successful, wait a little while

and try again.

If your device isn't active within 3 hours,

contact Premier Support at 866.499.8008,

Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 10 p.m. Eastern Time

for assistance.

Thank you for learning more about Premier.

And thank you for choosing AT&T.

For more infomation >> How to Activate a Wireless Device Online – AT&T Premier - Duration: 2:51.

-------------------------------------------

Draw with me 4 | New Beginnings - Duration: 5:10.

Hi guys, it's me. I'm finally back

I know it's been so long since I last uploaded a video

Oh God... so many things have happened in my personal life that have affected my channel

and my other social medias... but, oh well...

I am going to work on this and do my best to upload regularly

Well, as you can see I am in a new location. That's one of the things that have happened, that I moved

and it's been a mess. And , as you can tell, it has affected my channel

So, well... what are we going to do today?

I am just going to keep with the basic 'Irene style' of videos

in which I just draw a little bit and I just show you the process behind my drawings

Since I moved, I've been trying to decorate my flat with personalised drawings and all that

So, I think that I want to do that. I want to draw something that I would want to hang on my wall

that is i the same style of my previous drawings. Which you can check on my Instagram account

In which I've upload a think a few of the drawings I am going to hang on my wall

So, let's do that! Let's do a drawing that you can be proud of and show it to your friends

when they come by to your house

Let's start!

So guys, what I've been doing recently is picturing the drawing on my mind before I do it

and decide which style and materials I want to go for

because I've really been playing around with materials and techniques

and one great artist that inspires my drawings recently is Isabelle Arsenault

I got this book because it was recommended by another one of my favourite artists, Frannerd

And since then, I've been mesmerised by Isabella and all of her magical textures that she applies in her drawings

they are just breathtaking

I am going to change and start using this 9B, graphite pencil

which is going to creaet really dark and blendable textures

which are going to enrich the whole drawing

when you work with really bendable pencils like this one

one thing that you start noticing is that, as you draw, you are smudging the drawing and all the textures you created

So, what I've learnt... or the best solution for this, is to put a small piece of paper

or wax paper... anything that you could have around your house

and put it under your hand. So, in this way, you are not smudging the drawing

For more infomation >> Draw with me 4 | New Beginnings - Duration: 5:10.

-------------------------------------------

Wrangler RedRock 4x4 Pinnacle Oval Side Step w/ Bent Ends (2007-2017 JK 4 Door) Review & Install - Duration: 4:40.

I'm Ryan from extremeterrain.com, and this is my review and installation of the RedRock

4x4 Pinnacle Side Step with bent ends, fitting all 2007 to 2017 JKs.

These are available for both the two-door and the four-door JK.

Today we are gonna talk about the construction and the installation of these side steps.

These side steps are for those of you who wanna make it easier to get in and out of

your lifted or even stock height JK.

These have a really large wide stepping pad even bigger than a lot of the other oval or

round side steps on the market.

So, these are really all about function.

They also, because of their oval shape, do have a little bit of a different look, so,

if this is something you're after, I think they are definitely worth it.

They're priced aggressively and as far as the step goes, they're definitely functional.

These are a steel step that are covered in a black powder coat finish and they have these

really large plastic non-slip stepping pads.

These are so that if you are in the mud or the rain or snow, you're gonna be able to

step on this and not slide around, making it a lot easier to get in and out of your

Jeep.

Now, as I mentioned before, these are an oval step so, they have a bit of a lower profile

than some of the round steps on the market, and the bent ends just finish them off a little

bit and give a really nice to look to your Jeep especially from the profile view.

Now, a side step like this is not going to be armored.

In fact, this is going to decrease your ground clearance and it's definitely not going to

hold up to being banged off of trail obstacles.

So, if you are somebody who goes off-roading a lot and needs something that's gonna hold

up, or at least doesn't want something that's going to get damaged when they're on the trail,

I would not recommend taking a look at this.

RedRock 4x4 does make armor as well as Barricade, Smittybilt, Rugged Ridge and a host of other

brands.

A lot of that armor also has a step built into it, so you get best of both worlds.

However, armor even with a step built into it, is going to be a lot more expensive than

these side steps.

And the step that you get that's built into armor, usually isn't as user-friendly as this

one is.

The step is often an afterthought to the protection offered by the armor.

So, a step like this is going to be less expensive and far more functional as a step, however,

it's not great for off-roading.

If you are somebody who spends most of your time on road, this is gonna be a great option

and it will protect you against some door dings.

As far as installation, this install is in much the same way as a lot of the other side

steps on the market from a lot of different brands.

There are brackets included that will attach to both the pinch seam and the underside of

the tub.

Once you get those brackets installed, you can go ahead and screw the step bar onto your

newly installed brackets and you're finished.

Now, Jeep did change the tub design a little bit.

Some of you will have an open hole in the bottom of the tub, and others will have a

threaded hole.

Those of you with an open hole will use the included nut plate, and those of you with

a threaded hole won't need those.

So, at the end of this installation, you may have a couple of parts left over, but don't

worry about it.

Just follow the instructions carefully and this is an easy install for anyone who has

basic hand tools and about an hour of time.

I would recommend if you are one of those people that has threaded holes in the bottom

of your Jeep, and you either live in an environment where you get a lot of rust, or you take your

Jeep off road a lot, to have a tap handy that you can run up into that threaded hole in

the bottom of the Jeep, just to make sure it's nice and clean before you put one of

those new bolts in there and have a chance of cross threading it.

I think that these are priced really appropriately for what they are.

I've mentioned a couple times there are a lot of brands that make side steps, these

ones are a little bit more unique because they have an even wider and larger stepping

surface, they have a flatter oval look to them with the bent ends.

It's just a little bit of a different flavor onto a side step that's available from a lot

of different manufacturers.

And this side step is priced right around where the others ones are.

It can be very functional, it looks good, installs easy.

All in all, I'd say it's worth the price.

So, if you're looking for a side step to help you get in and out of your lifted or even

stock height JK and you're not after armor that's going to be that heavy duty protection

for your rockers, I would definitely recommend taking a look at this step.

There may be a lot of other options out there, but this does have a little bit of a twist

as far as the aesthetics and it's very functional especially for the price.

So, that's my review of the RedRock 4x4 Pinnacle Oval Side Step with bent ends, fitting all

2007 to 2017 JKs, that you can find right here at extremeterrain.com.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét