There is beauty and intention in the process  of filmmaking.
  Cinema invites you to reflect your own impulsions  and anxieties, considering which role you
  want to play when you juxtapose your psychological  interpretations to the filmmarker's intention.
  Perception walks side by side with film, it  is through cinema's gaze of the world that
  we disrupts our own state of consciousness.
  Cinema touches our deepest desires, but is  also unsettling because it plays with our
  darkest fears.
  Hitchcock once said, "The only way to get  rid of my fears is to make films about them"
  for there is a fetishism in film's gaze of  our inner monsters, the cinematic death might
  transgress death itself.
  The fascination of film lies in the frightening  notion that cinema is constantly transforming
  us, for film is aware of its spectator's gaze  as much as we are aware of the camera and
  its impossibilities.
  And it's by observing Hitchcock's quest for  ''the art of pure cinema'' that we can understand
  that art is constantly asserting something  about our humanity.
  But to talk about Hitchcock is also to talk  about cinema in its purest form.
  Hitchcock mastered every single aspect of  filmmaking: screenplay, cutting, photography,
  sound.
  It was Hitchcock that first understood cinema's  obsession with gaze, the fetish and the desire
  that the camera imposes in us spectators.
  The intrinsic eroticism provoked by death  on screen.
  Cinema's potencial to transform and resignify,  frame by frame, our vision of the world around
  us.
  To watch a Hitchcock movie is to experience  a provoking encounter with the craft of cinema,
  or perhaps, to rethink the idea of l'art pour  l'art.
  It was Hitchcock's deep pleasure in dominating  the moving image, his obsessive dedication
  to make artifice conquer nature and each meticulous  shot decision that revealed a vast aesthetic
  sensibility that marked forever Film History.
  Hitchcock's films evoke the underlying forces  that form our imagination.
  A truly asthete in his work, his choices unveil  their own psychological significances, in
  a dialogue with the spectator that speaks  below the threshold of our consciousness.
  And although sometimes almost mathematical,  his movies resonate as nightmares of the author
  to his audience.
  Hitchcock himself perceived films as projections,  dreams, constantly evoking childhood fears
  and common repressed dreads as motifs in his  filmography: voyeurism, the fear of heights,
  murder, betrayal, guilt, or even the unsettling  notion that chaos lies just underneath the
  surface of 
  the everyday life.
  Perhaps, Hitchcock's powerfull approach on  fear lies on the understanding that the evil
  doesn't lurk behind a door, but it is constantly  there, around us, watching.
  Fears are products of our psyche, they are  outcomes of our unconscious aprehencion of
  reality, our response for what goes beyond  human understanding.
  Suspense in Hitchcock's filmography is powerfull  because it is structural, it is character
  based and, therefore, blurs the line between  our reality and the diegetic space, metamorphosing
  what was once obscure and uncanny, into something  enthraling.
  Suspense is the pivotal logic of Hitchcock's  films, the nature of the camera declares something
  about the "art of pure cinema".
  It is his conscious use of film artifices  and techniques that define what it is, in
  fact, Hitchcokian.
  His almost perverse camera choices that build  up the tension by emphasizing details, bringing
  the audience closer, breaking the action into  puzzle pieces, revealing the hidden psychological
  meanings behind what is perceived.
  It is the dialogue between what the character  sees and what, us, the specators, grasp.
  It is the close ups that modifies our perception  by reclaiming the impact of proximity into
  storytelling, creating a tactile image-narrative  in a dialogue between film and viewer.
  Nothing in a Hitchcock film seems arbitrary  or innocent.
  As spectators we often stare at the diegetic  space through the eyes of individual characters,
  but Hitchcock's use of point-of-view reveals  much more than just a voyeuristic gaze.
  We are invited to look through Hitchcock's  eyes, entering the shell of his personality
  and discovering the rooted perversion that  may be also in our own nature, inerent to
  the human condition.
  And as the camera observes the subject, we  learn to see through the eyes of the Other:
  the character, the camera, Hitchcock.
  But if the use of camera reveals something  about our psyche, it is Hitchcock's approach
  on montage that disrupt even more the spectators  place, transforming our perception into an
  active agent in the process of unveiling the  storytelling.
  It is through montage that the elements become  more schematical, almost mathematical.
  If the shots and scenes are words, the montage  assemble phrases and, by doing so, perform
  a dual role: they obstruct and clear, they  reveal and hide both the transcendetal value
  of the cinematic image and the structure of  the narrative.
  Hitchcock's ambuiguity in approching montage  comes from a deep desire to control the gaze
  and also from a deeper understanding of the  impact of the cinematic language and its grammar.
  For there's something fascinating about  the almost antagonical way we perceive film
  and reality.
  We are trapped by our perception, we can't  experience and comprehend entirely everything
  that surround us, but with the cinematic reality  created by film, and specially Hitchcock's
  films, the curtains are raised and we are  invited to look in.
  Hithcock's use of slow dissolves as transitions  disclose something that was once hidden from
  the characters, but at the same time, bring  the audience to a clearer understanding of
  the frightful mystery that is the act of seeing  and perceiving.
  Hitchcock's dark vision transcend the art  of cinema.
  It transfigures the camera into an instrument  of taxidermy, a murder weapon that dissect
  its subject, but by doing that, also reflects  about its medium: film itself and, furthemore,
  vision.
  Hitchcock conjures up our nightmares only  to offer the possibility of transcendence
  through Art.
  Alfred Hitchcock's filmography calls for you  to open your eyes, and in a sadistic way,
  invites you to look into the nightmare of  our existance.
  My name is Luiza,  Thanks for watching
     
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét